tRNASer(CGA) differentially regulates expression of wild-type and codon-modified papillomavirus L1 genes

Exogenous transfer RNAs (tRNAs) favor translation of bovine papillomavirus 1 wild-type (wt) L1 mRNA in in vitro translation systems (Zhou et al. 1999, J. Virol., 73, 4972–4982). We, therefore, investigated whether papillomavirus (PV) wt L1 protein expression could be enhanced in eukaryotic cells following exogenous tRNA supplementation. Both Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and Cos1 cells, transfected with PV1 wt L1 genes, effectively transcribed the genes but did not translate them. However, L1 protein translation was demonstrated following co-transfection with the L1 gene and a gene expressing tRNA^Ser(CGA). Cell lines, stably transfected with a bovine papillomavirus 1 (BPV1) wt L1 expression construct, produced L1 protein after the transfection of the tRNA^Ser(CGA) gene, but not following the transfection with basal vectors, suggesting that tRNA^Ser(CGA) gene enhanced wt L1 translation as a result of endogenous tRNA alterations and phosphorylation of translation initiation factors elF4E and elF2α in the tRNA^Ser(CGA) transfected L1 cell lines. The tRNA^Ser(CGA) gene expression significantly reduced translation of L1 proteins expressed from codon-modified (HB) PV L1 genes utilizing mammalian preferred codons, but had variable effects on translation of green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) expressed from six serine GFP variants. The changes of tRNA pools appear to match the codon composition of PV wt and HB L1 genes and serine GFP variants to regulate translation of their mRNAs. These findings demonstrate for the first time in eukaryotic cells that translation of the target genes can be differentially influenced by the provision of a single tRNA expression construct.     

CUG Start Codon Generates Thioredoxin/Glutathione Reductase Isoforms in Mouse Testes

Mammalian cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductases are essential selenocysteine-containing enzymes that control thioredoxin functions. Thioredoxin/glutathione reductase (TGR) is a third member of this enzyme family. It has an additional glutaredoxin domain and shows highest expression in testes. Herein, we found that human and several other mammalian TGR genes lack any AUG codons that could function in translation initiation. Although mouse and rat TGRs have such codons, we detected protein sequences upstream of them by immunoblot assays and direct proteomic analyses. Further gene engineering and expression analyses demonstrated that a CUG codon, located upstream of the sequences previously thought to initiate translation, is the actual start codon in mouse TGR. The use of this codon relies on the Kozak consensus sequence and ribosome-scanning mechanism. However, CUG serves as an inefficient start codon that allows downstream initiation, thus generating two isoforms of the enzyme in vivo and in vitro. The use of CUG evolved in mammalian TGRs, and in some of these organisms, GUG is used instead. The newly discovered longer TGR form shows cytosolic localization in cultured cells and is expressed in spermatids in mouse testes. This study shows that CUG codon is used as an inefficient start codon to generate protein isoforms in mouse.     

Translation Driven by Picornavirus IRES Is Hampered from Sindbis Virus Replicons: Rescue by Poliovirus 2A Protease

Alphavirus replicons are very useful for analyzing different aspects of viral molecular biology. They are also useful tools in the development of new vaccines and highly efficient expression of heterologous genes. We have investigated the translatability of Sindbis virus (SV) subgenomic mRNA bearing different 5′-untranslated regions, including several viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) from picornaviruses, hepatitis C virus, and cricket paralysis virus. Our findings indicate that all these IRES-containing mRNAs are initially translated in culture cells transfected with the corresponding SV replicon but their translation is inhibited in the late phase of SV replication. Notably, co-expression of different poliovirus (PV) non-structural genes reveals that the protease 2A (2A^pro) is able to increase translation of subgenomic mRNAs containing the PV or encephalomyocarditis virus IRESs but not of those of hepatitis C virus or cricket paralysis virus. A PV 2A^pro variant deficient in eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4GI cleavage or PV protease 3C, neither of which cleaves eIF4GI, does not increase picornavirus IRES-driven translation, whereas L protease from foot-and-mouth disease virus also rescues translation. These findings suggest that the replicative foci of SV-infected cells where translation takes place are deficient in components necessary to translate IRES-containing mRNAs. In the case of picornavirus IRESs, cleavage of eIF4GI accomplished by PV 2A^pro or foot-and-mouth disease virus protease L rescues this inhibition. eIF4GI co-localizes with ribosomes both in cells electroporated with SV replicons bearing the picornavirus IRES and in cells co-electroporated with replicons that express PV 2A^pro. These findings support the idea that eIF4GI cleavage is necessary to rescue the translation driven by picornavirus IRESs in baby hamster kidney cells that express SV replicons.     

YaeJ is a novel ribosome-associated protein in Escherichia coli that can hydrolyze peptidyl-tRNA on stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, ribosomes often become stalled and are released by a trans-translation process mediated by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). In the absence of tmRNA, however, there is evidence that stalled ribosomes are released from non-stop mRNAs. Here, we show a novel ribosome rescue system mediated by a small basic protein, YaeJ, from Escherichia coli, which is similar in sequence and structure to the catalytic domain 3 of polypeptide chain release factor (RF). In vitro translation experiments using the E. coli-based reconstituted cell-free protein synthesis system revealed that YaeJ can hydrolyze peptidyl–tRNA on ribosomes stalled by both non-stop mRNAs and mRNAs containing rare codon clusters that extend downstream from the P-site and prevent Ala-tmRNA•SmpB from entering the empty A-site. In addition, YaeJ had no effect on translation of a normal mRNA with a stop codon. These results suggested a novel tmRNA-independent rescue system for stalled ribosomes in E. coli. YaeJ was almost exclusively found in the 70S ribosome and polysome fractions after sucrose density gradient sedimentation, but was virtually undetectable in soluble fractions. The C-terminal basic residue-rich extension was also found to be required for ribosome binding. These findings suggest that YaeJ functions as a ribosome-attached rescue device for stalled ribosomes.     

Multiple elements required for translation of plastid atpB mRNA lacking the Shine-Dalgarno sequence

The mechanism of translational initiation differs between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Prokaryotic mRNAs generally contain within their 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence that serves as a ribosome-binding site. Chloroplasts possess prokaryotic-like translation machinery, and many chloroplast mRNAs have an SD-like sequence, but its position is variable. Tobacco chloroplast atpB mRNAs contain no SD-like sequence and are U-rich in the 5′-UTR (−20 to −1 with respect to the start codon). In vitro translation assays with mutated mRNAs revealed that an unstructured sequence encompassing the start codon, the AUG codon and its context are required for translation. UV crosslinking experiments showed that a 50 kDa protein (p50) binds to the 5′-UTR. Insertion of an additional initiation region (SD-sequence and AUG) in the 5′-UTR, but not downstream, arrested translation from the authentic site; however, no inhibition was observed by inserting only an AUG triplet. We hypothesize for translational initiation of the atpB mRNA that the ribosome enters an upstream region, slides to the start codon and forms an initiation complex with p50 and other components.     

Back to basics: the untreated rabbit reticulocyte lysate as a competitive system to recapitulate cap/poly(A) synergy and the selective advantage of IRES-driven translation

Translation of most eukaryotic mRNAs involves the synergistic action between the 5′ cap structure and the 3′ poly(A) tail at the initiation step. The poly(A) tail has also been shown to stimulate translation of picornavirus internal ribosome entry sites (IRES)-directed translation. These effects have been attributed principally to interactions between eIF4G and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) but also to the participation of PABP in other steps during translation initiation. As the rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) does not recapitulate this cap/poly(A) synergy, several systems based on cellular cell-free extracts have been developed to study the effects of poly(A) tail in vitro but they generally exhibit low translational efficiency. Here, we describe that the non-nuclease-treated RRL (untreated RRL) is able to recapitulate the effects of poly(A) tail on translation in vitro. In this system, translation of a capped/polyadenylated RNA was specifically inhibited by either Paip2 or poly(rA), whereas translation directed by HCV IRES remained unaffected. Moreover, cleavage of eIF4G by FMDV L protease strongly stimulated translation directed by the EMCV IRES, thus recapitulating the competitive advantage that the proteolytic processing of eIF4G confers to IRES-driven RNAs.     

Efficient cap-dependent translation of mammalian mRNAs with long and highly structured 5′-untranslated regions in vitro and in vivo

According to the generally accepted scanning model proposed by M. Kozak, the secondary structure of the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of eukaryotic mRNA can only inhibit the translation initiation by counteracting migration of the 40S ribosomal subunit along the mRNA polynucleotide chain. The existence of efficiently translatable mRNAs with long and highly structured 5′-UTRs is incompatible with the cap-dependent scanning mechanism. Such mRNAs are expected to use alternative ways of translation initiation to be efficiently translated, primarily the mechanism of internal ribosome entry mediated by internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs), special RNA structures that reside in the 5′-UTR. The paper shows that this viewpoint is incorrect and is probably based on experiments with mRNA translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. This cell-free system fails to adequately reflect the relative translation efficiencies observed for different mRNAs in vivo. Five structurally similar mRNAs with either short leaders of the β-globin and β-actin mRNAs or long and highly structured 5′-UTRs of the c-myc, LINE-1, and Apaf-1 mRNAs displayed comparable translation activities in transfected cells and an entire cytoplasmic extract of cultivated cells. Translation activity proved to strongly depend on the presence of a cap at the 5′ end.     

An assessment of the masked message hypothesis: sea urchin egg messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes are efficient templates for in vitro protein synthesis

The rate of protein synthesis in unfertilized sea urchin eggs is very low, although all components for protein synthesis are present. To determine whether egg messenger RNAs are unavailable for translation because of “masking” by phenol-soluble inhibitors, crude and purified nonpolyribosomal messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs) from eggs of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus were translated in vitro in a wheat germ cell-free system. Crude and purified egg mRNPs were nearly as translatable as the mRNAs extracted from the mRNPs, suggesting that the mRNPs were not masked. No difference in the relative translational activities of mRNPs and their constituent mRNAs was revealed by isolating the mRNPs in buffers of different ionic strength or in the presence of protease and ribonuclease inhibitors. Furthermore, kinetic analysis of the in vitro translation and translation of the mRNPs and mRNAs at several concentrations of K⁺, Mg²⁺, and template all indicate that mRNPs are efficient templates for directing protein synthesis. Separation on polyacrylamide gels of the products of in vitro and in vivo translation demonstrated that both mRNPs and mRNAs extracted from the mRNPs synthesized in vitro high-molecular-weight polypeptides, some of which were also synthesized in vivo. Although sea urchin egg mRNPs may not be masked, there are several alternative mechanisms for regulating translation in the egg.     

Translation initiation with 70S ribosomes: an alternative pathway for leaderless mRNAs

It is generally accepted that translation in bacteria is initiated by 30S ribosomal subunits. In contrast, several lines of rather indirect in vitro evidence suggest that 70S monosomes are capable of initiating translation of leaderless mRNAs, starting with the A of the initiation codon. In this study, we demonstrate the proficiency of dedicated 70S ribosomes in in vitro translation of leaderless mRNAs. In support, we show that a natural leaderless mRNA can be translated with crosslinked 70S wild-type ribosomes. Moreover, we report that leaderless mRNA translation continues under conditions where the prevalence of 70S ribosomes is created in vivo, and where translation of bulk mRNA ceases. These studies provide in vivo as well as direct in vitro evidence for a 70S initiation pathway of a naturally occurring leaderless mRNA, and are discussed in light of their significance for bacterial growth under adverse conditions and their evolutionary implications for translation.     

Poly(A) dependent translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate

Poly(A) tail has been known to enhance mRNA translation in eukaryotic cells. However, the effect of poly(A) tail in vitro is rather small. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) is widely used for studying translation in vitro. Translation in RRL is typically performed in nuclease-treated lysate in which most of the endogenous mRNA have been removed. In this condition, the difference in the translational efficiency between poly(A)⁺ and poly(A)⁻ mRNAs is about two-fold. We studied the effect of poly(A) tail on luciferase mRNA translation in nuclease uncreated reticulocyte lysate, in which endogenous globin mRNAs were actively translated. In the case of capped mRNAs. stimulation of translation by poly(A) addition was about 1.5- to 1.6-fold and the effect of the poly(A) length was small. However, in the case of uncapped mRNAs, the addition of poly(A) tail increased luciferase expression over 10-fold. The effect of the poly(A) tail was dependent on its length. The difference in the translational efficiency was not due to the change of mRNA stability. These data indicate that RRL has the potential to translate mRNA in a poly(A) dependent manner.