EVOLUTIONARY CHARACTER ANALYSIS: TRACING CHARACTER CHANGE ON A CLADOGRAM

Abstract— There has been little formal discussion concerning character analysis in cladistics, even though characters and their character state trees are central to phylogenetic analyses. We refer to this field as Evolutionary Character Analysis. This paper defines the components of evolutionary character analysis: character state trees, transmodal characters, cladogram characters, attribute and character phylogenies; and the use of these components in phylogenetic inference and evolutionary studies. Character state trees and their effect on cladogram construction are discussed. A new method for numerically coding complex character state trees is described that further reduces the number of variables required to describe them. This method, ordinal coding, reduces the size of data matrices, and facilitates retrieval of state codes. This paper advocates the use of both biological evidence and evidence internal to the cladogram itself to construct character state trees (CSTs). We discuss general models of character evolution (morphocline analysis, Fitch minimum mutation model, etc.) and their role in forming CSTs. Character state trees formed with theories of character evolution are referred to as transmodal characters. These transmodal characters are contrasted with cladogram characters (Mickevich, 1982), and the place of each in a phylogenetic analysis is discussed. The method for determining cladogram characters is detailed with more complicated examples than found in previous publications. We advocate testing transmodal characters by comparing them with the resultant cladogram characters. This comparison involves transformation series analysis (TSA; Mickevich, 1982) which is viewed as an extension of reciprocal illumination. The TSA procedure and its place in hypothesis testing are reviewed. Tracing the evolution of characters interests both systematists and non-systematists alike. When character state trees (transmodal characters) are optimized on pre-existing phylogenies, character phylogenies and attribute phylogenies result. Attributes are defined as a feature that may or may not be homologous (i.e., ecological categories, plant hosts, etc.). We provide two illustrations of this approach, one involving the evolution of the anuran ear and another involving the coevolution of the butterfly Heliconius and its hostplants. Finally, the components of phylogenetic character analysis can be used to test more general evolutionary theories such as the biogenetic law and vicariance biogeography.     

Character Analysis in Cladistics: Abstraction, Reification, and the Search for Objectivity

The dangers of character reification for cladistic inference are explored. The identification and analysis of characters always involves theory-laden abstraction—there is no theory-free “view from nowhere.” Given theory-ladenness, and given a real world with actual objects and processes, how can we separate robustly real biological characters from uncritically reified characters? One way to avoid reification is through the employment of objectivity criteria that give us good methods for identifying robust primary homology statements. I identify six such criteria and explore each with examples. Ultimately, it is important to minimize character reification, because poor character analysis leads to dismal cladograms, even when proper phylogenetic analysis is employed. Given the deep and systemic problems associated with character reification, it is ironic that philosophers have focused almost entirely on phylogenetic analysis and neglected character analysis.     

Review of methodological problems of 'Computer cladistics' exemplified with a case study on isopod phylogeny (Crustacea: Isopoda)

Using a computerized phylogenetic analysis of the Isopoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) as source of typical errors and misunderstandings, problems that may occur in computer cladistics are reviewed. It is concluded that in addition to the errors that are possible in a conventional Hennigian analysis some specific methodological problems exist in computer cladistics. It is recommended that the OTU be replaced by the groundpattern concept. Tree statistics are not useful for comparing different competing hypotheses. Arguments ought to concentrate on the hypo-thetico-deductive steps of the analysis, i.e. on character analysis. The use of computers does not add objectivity to character analysis. Single outgroup taxa should not be used in assessing the character states of ingroups. Concerning isopod phylogeny, it is argued here that the tail fan of the Isopoda can probably be derived from the eumalacostracan groundpattern and did not evolve de novo within the Isopoda.     

HYBRIDS AND PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS I. PATTERNS OF CHARACTER EXPRESSION IN HYBRIDS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR CLADISTIC ANALYSIS

Interspecific hybridization is considered common among plants, but the methods of cladistic systematics produce only divergently branching phylogenetic hypotheses and thus cannot give the correct phylogeny if an analysis includes hybrids. Empirical studies of the impact of known hybrids on phylogenetic analysis are lacking, and are necessary to begin to understand the problems that we face if hybrids are often included in cladistic analysis. Examination of the implications of hybrids for cladistics must begin with patterns of character expression in hybrids. This study includes 17 hybrids and their nine parental taxa that are Central American species of Aphelandra (Acanthaceae), analyzed using a set of 50 morphological characters. The hybrids are overwhelmingly intermediate as quantitatively scored for phylogenetic analysis. They express maternal and paternal, and primitive and derived characters in equal frequencies, showing no evidence of predominant inheritance of derived character states as has been assumed by most cladists who have considered hybrids theoretically. Because of their known genetic constitution, hybrids were useful in homology assessment and ordering character states. The parental character set was generally robust, but some changes were made to reflect the special evidence offered by the hybrids. These hybrids suggest that the inclusion of hybrids in phylogenetic analysis will not lead to unresolved cladograms with rampant homoplasy, as has been predicted by other authors. Instead, the patterns of character inheritance in these hybrids lead to the prediction that a hybrid will be placed by phylogenetic analysis as a basal lineage to the clade that includes its most derived parent, with relatively little effect on homoplasy. These predictions will be evaluated by incorporation of the hybrids in phylogenetic analyses, to be reported in a subsequent paper.     

Adaptation and functional integration in primate phylogenetics

In two areas of phylogenetics, contrary predictions have been developed and maintained for character analysis and weighting. With regard to adaptation, many have argued that adaptive characters are poorly suited to phylogenetic analysis because of a propensity for homoplasy, while others have argued that complex adaptive characters should be given high weight because homoplasy in complex characters is unlikely. Similarly, with regard to correlated sets of characters, one point of view is that such sets should be collapsed into a single character-a single piece of phylogenetic evidence. Another point of view is that a suite of correlated characters should be emphasized in phylogenetics, again because recurrence of detailed similarity in the same suite of features is unlikely. In this paper, I discuss the theoretical background of adaptation and functional integration with respect to phylogenetic systematics of primates. Several character examples are reviewed with regard to their functional morphology and phylogenetic signal: postorbital structures, tympanic morphology, fusion of the mandibular symphysis, the tooth comb, strepsirrhine talar morphology, and the prehensile tail. It is clear when considering characters such as these that some characters are synapomorphic of major clades and at the same time functionally important. This appears particularly to be the case when characters are integrated into a complex and maintained as stable configurations. Rather than being simply a problem in character analysis, processes of integration may help to explain the utility of phylogenetically informative characters. On the other hand, the character examples also highlight the difficulty in forming a priori predictions about a character's phylogenetic signal. Explanations of patterns of character evolution are often clade-specific, which does not allow for a simple framework of character selection and/or weighting.     

On the Three-Taxon Approach to Parsimony Analysis

The following three basic defects for which three-taxon analysis has been rejected as a method for biological systematics are reviewed: (1) character evolution is a priori assumed to be irreversible; (2) basic statements that are not logically independent are treated as if they are; (3) three-taxon statements that are considered as independent support for a given tree may be mutually exclusive on that tree. It is argued that these criticisms only relate to the particular way the three-taxon approach was originally implemented. Four-taxon analysis, an alternative implementation that circumvents these problems, is derived. Four-taxon analysis is identical to standard parsimony analysis except for an unnatural restriction on the maximum amount of homoplasy that may be concentrated in a single character state. This restriction follows directly from the basic tenet of the three-taxon approach, that character state distributions should be decomposed into basic statements that are, in themselves, still informative with respect to relationships. A reconsideration of what constitutes an elementary relevant statement in systematics leads to a reformulation of standard parsimony as two-taxon analysis and to a rejection of four-taxon analysis as a method for biological systematics.     

Mapping characters on a tree with or without the outgroups

A character of special interest in evolutionary studies is usually optimized on a phylogenetic tree, with or without the outgroups employed in that analysis. Both practices are never justified and look like arbitrary choices. Focusing on one example, we draw the conclusion that authors retain or remove outgroups depending on the way these outgroups sample the diversity of states of the character(s) of special interest. The topology without outgroups is often used by authors when different outgroup taxa non‐exhaustively sample the different states of the character of interest outside of the ingroup. This can make the analysis incoherent, because its different steps are not based on the same data matrix (outgroups are removed in the last step). It can provide several incoherent and possibly different patterns for a same character of interest, one issuing from the first step of phylogeny construction and the other resulting from the a posteriori optimization on the truncated topology. Phylogenetic analyses should be designed to minimize this problem, selecting outgroup and ingroup taxa whose diversity of character states is needed for reconstructing the evolutionary history of the character of interest. © The Willi Hennig Society 2004.     

Character compatibility of molecular markers to distinguish asexual and sexual reproduction

Particularly in polyploids, the potential of the high variability of dominant markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPDs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) in population genetic studies and analysis of breeding systems is reduced due to their dominant nature. In contrast, the criterion of character compatibility is hindered neither by dominance nor by polyploidy as allelic interpretation is not necessary. Character compatibility, which can be used to detect events of genetic exchange (or recombination), is particularly informative if these events are expected to be rare such as in taxa with extensive vegetative reproduction or apomixis. Binary unordered characters such as presence and absence of anonymous DNA markers are incompatible if all four pairwise combinations of character states are present among the individuals studied. Because incompatible character state distributions defy any progenitor–derivative relationship among individuals, they provide strong evidence for genetic exchange. Both the absolute number of incompatible character combinations and the probability of compatibility can be used as a measure of incompatibility. Although these measures may not directly relate to the frequency of genetic exchange, they provide a useful tool to heuristically explore data sets. The most commonly used input for multivariate analyses and analysis of molecular variance in population genetic studies of (dis)similarity of marker distributions are amalgamates of mutation and recombination. Character compatibility can be used to complement these traditional methods of analysis. Advantages and disadvantages of character incompatibility relative to multilocus analysis of modes of reproduction and population genetics are demonstrated with data from RAPDs, isozymes, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) of the nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast genome.     

CHARACTER DEFINITIONS AND CHARACTER STATE DELINEATION: THE BETE NOIRE OF PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE

Abstract— Currently characters are static concepts whose definition and state delineations seldom undergo any scrutiny. Common systematic practice tends to synthesize character slates by combining or dividing observed conditions, a situation most likely due to current theoretical limitations in phylogenetic inference, which tends to ignore problems of multistate characters. This process we refer to as the “synthetic” method for character definition. Character definitions derived for the genera of North American Cochylini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using “synthetic” character states postulated that the cochylines were not monophyletic. The use of cladogram characters and nearest neighbor matrices in uncovering potential flaws in character state delineation is demonstrated. The “synthetic” set of character definitions proved deficient upon such analysis, principally due to its attempt to force highly variable features into a few states. The set of character definitions produced from this analysis is referred to as “reflective” because it does not ignore observed variation. It produces characters with many states and presents problems of setting up transformation series. Three means lor deriving transformations are applied to produce transformation series for the reflective set of character definitions: the unordered outgroup method, morphocline analysis and Transformation Series Analysis (TSA). All three data sets postulated the Cochylini as monophyletic. The three sets of phylogenies were compared. Consensus trees are ambiguous when analysing changes in hierarchy. In order to summarize these results in a manner which does not destroy the phylogenetic structure, positional subtrees, a new means for summarizing multiple solution cladograms, are introduced. It was found that all three sets of transformations produced very different cladograms which in turn were very different from the tree produced by the original, synthetic definitions. The results of each of these methods were assessed for their internal consistency. TSA gave the least contradictory results.     

Optimal species distinction by discriminant analysis: comparing established methods of character selection with a combination procedure using ant morphometrics as a case study

We compare the performances of established means of character selection for discriminant analysis in species distinction with a combination procedure for finding the optimal character combination (minimum classification error, minimum number of required characters), using morphometric data sets from the ant genera Cardiocondyla , Lasius and Tetramorium . The established methods are empirical character selection as well as forward selection, backward elimination and stepwise selection of discriminant analysis. The combination procedure is clearly superior to the established methods of character selection, and is widely applicable.     

Identification of apomorphies and the role of groundpatterns in molecular systematics

Putative apomorphic character states are the only relevant phylogenetic signal contained in sets of sequence data. Using the sequence position as a character, a way to identify putative apomorphies prior to phylogenetic analysis is proposed. It is shown that distance-matrix methods use trivial characters. The concept of the asymmetrical split is presented for determination of character polarity. It is furthermore argued that groundpatterns (node sequences) should be reconstructed prior to the study of relationships between taxa of high phylogenetic age. The 'evolutionary noise'contained in groundpatterns can be illustrated with a network of distances using a split-decomposition analysis.     

On gaps.

Gaps result from the alignment of sequences of unequal length during primary homology assessment. Viewed as character states originating from particular biological events (mutation), gaps contain historical information suitable for phylogenetic analysis. The effect of gaps as a source of phylogenetic data is explored via sensitivity analysis and character congruence among different data partitions. Example data sets are provided to show that gaps contain important phylogenetic information not recovered by those methods that omit gaps in their calculations. However, gap cost schemes are arbitrary (although they must be explicit) and thus data exploration is a necessity of molecular analyses, while character congruence is necessary as an external criterion for hypothesis decision.     

Multivariate character process models for the analysis of two or more correlated function-valued traits

Various methods, including random regression, structured antedependence models, and character process models, have been proposed for the genetic analysis of longitudinal data and other function-valued traits. For univariate problems, the character process models have been shown to perform well in comparison to alternative methods. The aim of this article is to present an extension of these models to the simultaneous analysis of two or more correlated function-valued traits. Analytical forms for stationary and nonstationary cross-covariance functions are studied. Comparisons with the other approaches are presented in a simulation study and in an example of a bivariate analysis of genetic covariance in age-specific fecundity and mortality in Drosophila. As in the univariate case, bivariate character process models with an exponential correlation were found to be quite close to first-order structured antedependence models. The simulation study showed that the choice of the most appropriate methodology is highly dependent on the covariance structure of the data. The bivariate character process approach proved to be able to deal with quite complex nonstationary and nonsymmetric cross-correlation structures and was found to be the most appropriate for the real data example of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.     

PHYLOGENY OF THE NEMERTEAN SUBCLASS PALAEONEMERTEA (ANOPLA, NEMERTEA)

Abstract— A cladistic analysis based on 50 morphological characters was performed for 49 of the 98 species currently assigned to the subclass Palaeonemertea (phylum Nemertea), and six additional undescribed species. Thirty-five species were excluded from the parsimony analysis because of the high number of unknowns in the character matrix, and one species since it was considered a nomen nudum . An initial analysis suggested that the subclass Hoplonemertea is the sistergroup to the clade Palaeo- and Heteronemertea and the ingroup cladograms are rooted using a paraphyletic outgroup based on this information. Seventy-two equally most parsimonious cladograms were found; the consistency index was low but tree-length distribution for the character set is skewed to the left, and the cladograms are invariably shorter than trees based on random data. These cladograms suggested a character transformation series for the cerebral organ where this complex character reappeared several times after being absent. We considered this biologically implausible and the final discussion is based on three cladograms, one step longer than the most parsimonious, where the evolution of this character appears to be more realistic. The cladistic analysis indicates that many previously recognized genera (e.g. Cephalothrix, Procephalothrix and Cephalotrichella ), and higher taxa, are paraphyletic. It furthermore indicates that the previously suggested hypothesis of the Archinemertea as a monophyletic sistertaxon to Palaeonemertea is unsupported.     

用主成分分析法分析金翅夜蛾亚科各性状对分类的重要性和性状变异方向

本文在“金翅夜蛾亚科的数值分类研究”的基础上用主成分分析的结果对金翅夜蛾亚科分类的性状做进一步分析,说明各性状对分类的重要性和性状的变异方向,并对用协方差矩阵和相关矩阵进行的主成分分析结果进行比较,说明对本问题（分类指标全是定性指标）适宜用协方差矩阵做主成分分析。     

Evolution of the placenta and associated reproductive characters in bats

Recent advances in molecular phylogenetics indicate that the order Chiroptera is monophyletic and that one of four lineages of microbats (Rhinolophoidea) shares a common origin with megabats. Against this background we undertook a comprehensive analysis of placental evolution in bats. We defined a range of characters and character states associated with female reproduction, early development, placentation and the neonate. These were then mapped on a pre-existing hypothesis of bat relationships that represents the current view from molecular studies. Our purpose was threefold. First, on the assumption of bat monophyly, we wished to establish the stem species pattern of extant chiropterans. Secondly, we asked whether there are derived character conditions in support of a common origin for Rhinolophoidea and the megabats. Thirdly, we looked for evolutionary character transformations that characterize higher-level clades within Chiroptera, i.e. the megabats and the four lineages of microbats. The character condition occurring in the last common ancestor of Chiroptera was unequivocal for 21 of the 25 characters included in the analysis. The data did not offer support for a megabat-rhinolophoid clade or the implication that microbats are paraphyletic. However, analysis of early development, placentation and other reproductive parameters resulted in derived character conditions for the megabats as well as for each of the four major lineages of microbats.     

The language of systematics,and the philosophy of ‘total evidence’

This contribution analyses the primacy of classification over generalization, and the philosophy of total evidence that emerges from the relation of homology to character statements. Primary conjectures of homology are basic character statements, i.e. statements that predicate properties of organisms, properties that are instantiated by those organisms and/or their parts. Secondary conjectures of homology are embedded in a second‐level (metalinguistic) discourse that turns on the coherence or incoherence of those basic character statements relative to a hierarchy. The coherence or incoherence of character statements is a logical relation between statements, not a causal (historical) relation between organisms. The choice of the hypothesis of relationships that is supported by the largest set of coherent basic character statements is based on the empirical presupposition that the properties referred to by the set of coherent character statements are grounded in causally efficacious relations of inheritance and ontogeny, and co‐instantiated because they are inherited through common ancestry (Hennig's auxiliary principle). Unless that empirical presupposition is causally grounded, phylogeny reconstruction is of an inherently probabilistic nature, whether under parsimony or other models of analysis. The causal grounding of a coherent set of character statements typically seeks a link between character statements and causally efficacious generative mechanisms for morphological characters (as is defeasibly indicated by topology and connectivity), or secondary structure information for molecular characters.     

Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodilian evolution

Crocodilians show a high degree of cranial variation and convergence throughout their 80 million-year fossil record that complicates their phylogenetic reconstruction. Conflicting phylogenetic results from different data partitions and character homoplasies typify crocodilian phylogeny, and differences between molecular and morphological phylogenetic hypotheses are believed to be associated with the slender-snout skull shape of Gavialis gangeticus and Tomistoma schlegelii. Slender-snout skulls are one of five identified eusuchian cranial ecomorph shape categories (ESCs) thought to reflect functional or ecological specialization. This paper tested the effect of transitions among general, blunt and slender ESCs on cranial character-state distributions in phylogeny using the concentrated changes test. In addition, 'tree-free' character compatibility analysis of character independence was conducted on the morphological character matrix to determine if character correlations are observed independent of specific tree topologies. Results suggest cranial ESCs do affect cranial character-state gains in phylogeny. Concentrated changes identify a broad suite of character-state changes that significantly correlate with transitions to slender, general and blunt ESCs on morphological, molecular and combined-data tree topologies, but numbers of correlated characters for each category differ according to topology. Character compatibility analysis results do not mirror the concentrated changes test results and reflect hierarchically distributed support throughout the data. As cranial ESCs affect character-state transitions, it is possible that nonphylogenetic variables could affect inferences of crocodilian phylogeny by affecting cranial morphology.