Is isolabeling a false image?

Isolabeling in Chinese hamster chromosomes was studied by using a new method which enabled clear demarcation of sister chromatids without the usage of tritium label. The method involved continuous labeling of cells with 5-bromodeoxyuridine and staining of fixed chromosomes with acridine orange. Isolabeling was easily observed in chromosome preparations processed according to the conventional autoradiographic methods, especially in cells treated with ethyl methanesulphonate, and its frequency was dependent on the concentration of the drug. On the other hand, no isolabeling was detected in preparations made by the new method, but exchanges of short segments of sister chromatids were observed frequently, depending upon the concentration of ethyl methanesulphonate. These results strongly suggest that isolabeling observable in autoradiographs is a consequence of sister chromatid exchanges combined with image spread that attends autoradiography.     

DNA-Replikation und Chromosomenstruktur von Mesostoma (Turbellaria)

During meiosis in M. ehrenbergi (2n=10) and M. lingua (2n=8) male certain chromosomes never pair completely. In these bivalents only terminal pairing appears, crossing over could not be proved by ³H-thymidine autoradiography. DNA amounts of the M. ehrenbergi and M. lingua genomes are in a proportion of 10∶1. The mitotic S-phase of spermatogonia in M. ehrenbergi is twice as long as in M. lingua. In metaphase of spermatogonia a differentiated DNA replication pattern can be identified in M. ehrenbergi as late-pulse-replicating segments. After incorporation of ³H-thymidine X₂-metaphase chromosomes can be found, which show single chromatid labeling, terminal and intercalary isolabeling as well as kinds of chromosome labeling, which can only result from sister strand exchange. After treating the chromosomes with low temperature, colchicine or by hydrolysis (60° C) substructures of the chromatin become visible in both spezies which however are evaluated as artefacts. — Formation of the different isolabeling types is discussed on the basis of a two-strand model of the chromosome fibril. A hypothesis is formulated that the surplusage of DNA in M. ehrenbergi is distributed over all the length of the chromatids as small parts of heterochromatin. This hypothesis is supported by investigations of the DNA replication and the contractility of the chromosomes. Furthermore, a pattern of small DNA particles can be demonstrated after partial destruction of the DNA in metaphase chromosomes of M. ehrenbergi, which could represent this intercalary heterochromatin.     

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids of the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids for the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse has been achieved by the combination of two differential staining techniques; one for the heterochromatic X chromosome and the other for sister chromatids. Thermal hypotonic treatment moderately destroyed the chromosome structure except for the heterochromatic X in BrdU labelled metaphase cells, resulting in the selective sister chromatid differentiation of this X with Giemsa stain. This technique enables us to know the exact frequency of the spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in the heterochromatic X without using ³H-TdR labelling for detecting the late DNA replication. The results indicate that the sister chromatid exchange frequency of the heterochromatic X chromosome is not affected by its late DNA replication during S phase, or by the genetic inactivation and the resulting heterochromatinization.     

A change in sister chromatid behavior precedes nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We used a genetic assay to monitor the behavior of sister chromatids during the cell cycle. We show that the ability to induce sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) with ionizing radiation is maximal in budded cells with undivided nuclei and then decreases prior to nuclear division. SCE can be induced in cells arrested in G2 using either nocodazole or cdc mutants. These data show that sister chromatids have two different states prior to nuclear division. We suggest that the sister chromatids of cir. III, a circular derivative of chromosome III, separate (anaphase A) prior to spindle elongation (anaphase B). Other interpretations are also discussed. SCE can be induced in cdc mutants that arrest in G2 and in nocodazole-treated cells, suggesting that mitotic checkpoints arrest cells prior to sister chromatid separation.     

A change in sister chromatid behavior precedes nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We used a genetic assay to monitor the behavior of sister chromatids during the cell cycle. We show that the ability to induce sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) with ionizing radiation is maximal in budded cells with undivided nuclei and then decreases prior to nuclear division. SCE can be induced in cells arrested in G2 using either nocodazole or cdc mutants. These data show that sister chromatids have two different states prior to nuclear division. We suggest that the sister chromatids of cir. III, a circular derivative of chromosome III, separate (anaphase A) prior to spindle elongation (anaphase B). Other interpretations are also discussed. SCE can be induced in cdc mutants that arrest in G2 and in nocodazole-treated cells, suggesting that mitotic checkpoints arrest cells prior to sister chromatid separation. Received: 3 July 1996 / Accepted: 4 October 1996     

GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion

Background Precise control of sister chromatid separation is essential for the accurate transmission of genetic information. Sister chromatids must remain linked to each other from the time of DNA replication until the onset of chromosome segregation, when the linkage must be promptly dissolved. Recent studies suggest that the machinery that is responsible for the destruction of mitotic cyclins also degrades proteins that play a role in maintaining sister chromatid linkage, and that this machinery is regulated by the spindle-assembly checkpoint. Studies on these problems in budding yeast are hampered by the inability to resolve its chromosomes by light or electron microscopy.Results We have developed a novel method for visualizing specific DNA sequences in fixed and living budding yeast cells. A tandem array of 256 copies of the Lac operator is integrated at the desired site in the genome and detected by the binding of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Lac repressor fusion expressed from the HIS3 promoter. Using this method, we show that sister chromatid segregation precedes the destruction of cyclin B. In mad or bub cells, which lack the spindle-assembly checkpoint, sister chromatid separation can occur in the absence of microtubules. The expression of a tetramerizing form of the GFP–Lac repressor, which can bind Lac operators on two different DNA molecules, can hold sister chromatids together under conditions in which they would normally separate.Conclusions We conclude that sister chromatid separation in budding yeast can occur in the absence of microtubule-dependent forces, and that protein complexes that can bind two different DNA molecules are capable of holding sister chromatids together.     

A multi-step pathway for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion

The cohesion of sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin, a protein complex containing members of the structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) family. How cohesins tether sister chromatids is not yet understood. Here, we mutate SMC1, the gene encoding a cohesin subunit of budding yeast, by random insertion dominant negative mutagenesis to generate alleles that are highly informative for cohesin assembly and function. Cohesins mutated in the Hinge or Loop1 regions of Smc1 bind chromatin by a mechanism similar to wild-type cohesin, but fail to enrich at cohesin-associated regions (CARs) and pericentric regions. Hence, the Hinge and Loop1 regions of Smc1 are essential for the specific chromatin binding of cohesin. This specific binding and a subsequent Ctf7/Eco1-dependent step are both required for the establishment of cohesion. We propose that a cohesin or cohesin oligomer tethers the sister chromatids through two chromatin-binding events that are regulated spatially by CAR binding and temporally by Ctf7 activation, to ensure cohesins crosslink only sister chromatids.     

Shugoshin1 may play important roles in separation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids during mouse oocyte meiosis

Background

Homologous chromosomes separate in meiosis I and sister chromatids separate in meiosis II, generating haploid gametes. To address the question why sister chromatids do not separate in meiosis I, we explored the roles of Shogoshin1 (Sgo1) in chromosome separation during oocyte meiosis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Sgo1 function was evaluated by exogenous overexpression to enhance its roles and RNAi to suppress its roles during two meioses of mouse oocytes. Immunocytochemistry and chromosome spread were used to evaluate phenotypes. The exogenous Sgo1 overexpression kept homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids not to separate in meiosis I and meiosis II, respectively, while the Sgo1 RNAi promoted premature separation of sister chromatids.

Conclusions

Our results reveal that prevention of premature separation of sister chromatids in meiosis I requires the retention of centromeric Sgo1, while normal separation of sister chromatids in meiosis II requires loss of centromeric Sgo1.     

Rapid irradiation procedure for obtaining permanent differential staining of sister chromatids and aspects of its underlying mechanism

Summary When fixed metaphase preparations of lymphocytes cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are subjected to a 1-min simple irradiation treatment with near-ultraviolet light (radiation dose 3×10⁵ J/m²), subsequent Giemsa staining produces differential staining of sister chromatids irrespective of previous exposure to a photosensitizer. The effects of this procedure were analyzed by irradiating single metaphases under the microscope, thus allowing precise dosage of radiation: Metaphase were subsequently stained with Giemsa and then subjected to the Feulgen-Schiff procedure. Whereas in the presence of DAPI as a photosensitizer a differential breakdown of BrdU-containing DNA in the chromatids under the influence of irradiation appeared to be the cause of sister chromatid differentiation, alterations presumably in the higher oeder structure of chromatin, not accompanied by removal of DNA, induced sister chromatid differentiation without DAPI.     

分离酶的作用及其调节

姐妹染色单体的分离是一精确时空调控事件,分离的紊乱会造成遗传物质传递的不稳定,从而可能引起严重的后果-细胞或个体的死亡或病态。在真核生物细胞中,一种比较保守的机制调控着姐妹染色单体的分离:随DNA复制过程建立由黏合素维持的姐妹染色单体的结合,在有丝分裂中期向后期转变过程中,随保全素的降解,分离酶发挥活性,裂解黏合素一个亚单位,促成黏合素蛋白质复合体的解离和姐妹染色单体的分离。     

Micromanipulation of chromosomes reveals that cohesion release during cell division is gradual and does not require tension

In mitosis, cohesion appears to be present along the entire length of the chromosome, between centromeres and along chromosome arms. By metaphase, sister chromatids appear as two adjacent but visibly distinct rods. Sister chromatids separate from one another in anaphase by releasing all chromosome cohesion. This is different from meiosis I, in which pairs of sister chromatids separate from one another, moving to each spindle pole by releasing cohesion only between sister chromatid arms. Then, in anaphase II, sister chromatids separate by releasing centromere cohesion. Our objective was to find where cohesion is present or absent on chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis and when and how it is released. We determined cohesion directly by pulling on chromosomes with two micromanipulation needles. Thus, we could distinguish for the first time between apparent doubleness as seen in the microscope and physical separability. We found that apparent doubleness can be deceiving: Visibly distinct sister chromatids often cannot be separated. We also demonstrated that cohesion is released gradually in anaphase, with chromosomes looking as if they were unzipped or pulled apart. This implied that tension from spindle forces was required, but we showed directly that no tension was necessary to pull chromatids apart.     

The effect of x-rays on labelling pattern of M 1 and M 2 chromosomes in Chinese hamster cells

Chinese hamster cells (line CHEF-125) were cultured for 1 or 4 h in the presence of tritiated thymidine (³HTdR). Immediately after the end of the treatment with ³HTdR or 4 h afterwards, some cultures were irradiated with X-rays, while others served as controls.Analysis of colchicine-C anaphase of M₁ and M₂ cells showed that: (a) in the M₁ chromosomes the X-rays produced a significant departure from a 1:1 ratio of the number of silver grains counted on the sister chromatids; and (b) in the M₂ chromosomes the X-rays increased significantly the frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges and of isolabelling regions.Subchromatid exchanges involving a single polynucleotide strand may be induced by X-rays. These exchanges would cause inequality of labelling over M₁ sister chromatids and isolabelling in the M₂ chromosomes.     

Genetic Control of Mitosis: Features of Anaphase Separation of Sister Chromatid Sets in Mutant Strain aar V158 in Drosophila melanogaster

The effect of mutation aar ^V158 on anaphase separation of chromatids was studied on fixed cells of neural ganglia of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. It was shown that mutation aar ^V158 causes three types of defective chromosome segregation manifested as (1) monopolar anaphase, (2) separation of chromatids to an abnormally short distance in anaphase, and (3) bridging and lagging of some chromatids or prolonged asynchronous separation of sister chromatid sets to the poles in anaphase. We believe that the former two types of defective segregation are caused by disturbed centrosome separation at the beginning of mitosis and the third type, by defects in chromatid separation during anaphase. During the two-year maintenance of the mutation in a heterozygous state, partial correction (adaptive modification) of the defects of type 1 and type 2 (but not type 3) occurred. The correction of type 1 and type 2 defects during adaptogenesis depended on the genotype: in heterozygotes and homozygotes, respectively type 1 and type 2 were preferentially corrected. The frequency of type 3 defects remained constant during the two-year period of maintenance of the mutation in a heterozygous state. However, in all variants of the experiment, their frequency decreased with increasing distance between the sister chromatid sets. In the cells that completed the previous division with abnormalities, the checkpoint system is supposed to effectively arrest the cell cycle in the subsequent division.     

Endomitosis in the mealy bug,Planococcus citri (Homoptera: Coccoidea)

Endomitosis in the Malpighian tubules of the mealy bug Planococcus citri (Risso) is described. The stages are identified on the basis of the length of the chromosomes and the distance between the sister chromatids or chromosomes. The appearance of the chromosomes in the various stages of endomitosis is compared to that in other hemipteran insects. During anaphase and telophase of endomitosis the ends of the sister chromatids and chromosomes tend to stay together longer than the other parts. It is suggested that in holokinetic chromosomes special regions for holding the chromatids together are concentrated near the ends of the chromosomes.Supported by grant GB1585 from the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxyuridine- and 5-iododeoxyuridine substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes

Incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) or 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) into the chromosomal DNA of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during two rounds of replication causes sister chromatids to be differentiated so that they can be discriminated from one another by staining and morphology. Chromatids that contain BUdR or IUdR in both DNA strands stain lighter and are less condensed than their sister chromatids with only unifilar substitution. The halogenated pyrimidine nucleosides also induce sister chromatid exchanges that can be detected without autoradiography. The frequency of these exchanges is markedly increased by exposing the cells to light flashes.     

HIV uses autophagy for its own means

Replicated sister chromatids are held together until mitosis by cohesin, a conserved multisubunit complex comprised of Smc1, Smc3, Scc1, and Scc3, which in vertebrate cells exists as two closely related homologues (SA1 and SA2). Here, we show that cohesin^SA1 and cohesin^SA2 are differentially required for telomere and centromere cohesion, respectively. Cells deficient in SA1 are unable to establish or maintain cohesion between sister telomeres after DNA replication in S phase. The same phenotype is observed upon depletion of the telomeric protein TIN2. In contrast, in SA2-depleted cells telomere cohesion is normal, but centromere cohesion is prematurely lost. We demonstrate that loss of telomere cohesion has dramatic consequences on chromosome morphology and function. In the absence of sister telomere cohesion, cells are unable to repair chromatid breaks and suffer sister telomere loss. Our studies elucidate the functional distinction between the Scc3 homologues in human cells and further reveal an essential role for sister telomere cohesion in genomic integrity.     

Mitotic inter-homologue junctions accumulate at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants

Mitotic homologous recombination is utilised to repair DNA breaks using either sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes as templates. Because sister chromatids are identical, exchanges between sister chromatids have no consequences for the maintenance of genomic integrity unless they involve repetitive DNA sequences. Conversely, homologous chromosomes might differ in genetic content, and exchanges between homologues might lead to loss of heterozygosity and subsequent inactivation of functional genes. Genomic instability, caused by unscheduled recombination events between homologous chromosomes, is enhanced in the absence of RecQ DNA helicases, as observed in Bloom's cancer-prone syndrome. Here, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to analyse budding yeast diploid cells that were modified to distinguish replication intermediates originating from each homologous chromosome. Therefore, these cells were suitable for analysing the formation of inter-homologue junctions. We found that Rad51-dependent DNA structures resembling inter-homologue junctions accumulate together with sister chromatid junctions at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants, but not in the absence of Srs2 or Mph1 DNA recombination helicases. Inter-homologue joint molecules in recQ mutants are less abundant than sister chromatid junctions, but they accumulate with similar kinetics after origin firing under conditions of DNA damage. We propose that unscheduled accumulation of inter-homologue junctions during DNA replication might account for allelic recombination defects in recQ mutants.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion

During S phase, not only does DNA have to be replicated, but also newly synthesized DNA molecules have to be connected with each other. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle, and is thus an essential prerequisite for chromosome segregation. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin complexes that are thought to embrace sister chromatids as large rings. Cohesin binds to DNA dynamically before DNA replication and is converted into a stably DNA-bound form during replication. This conversion requires acetylation of cohesin, which in vertebrates leads to recruitment of sororin. Sororin antagonizes Wapl, a protein that is able to release cohesin from DNA, presumably by opening the cohesin ring. Inhibition of Wapl by sororin therefore “locks” cohesin rings on DNA and allows them to maintain cohesion for long periods of time in mammalian oocytes, possibly for months or even years.DNA replication during the synthesis (S) phase generates identical DNA molecules, which, in their chromatinized form, are called sister chromatids. The pairs of sister chromatids remain united as part of one chromosome during the subsequent gap (G₂) phase and during early mitosis, in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase. During these stages of mitosis chromosomes condense, in most eukaryotes the nuclear envelope breaks down, and in all species chromosomes are ultimately attached to both poles of the mitotic spindle. Only once this biorientation has been achieved for all chromosomes, the sister chromatids are separated from each other in anaphase and transported toward opposite spindle poles of the mother cell, enabling its subsequent division into two genetically identical daughter cells.This series of events critically depends on the fact that sister chromatids remain physically connected with each other from S phase until metaphase. This physical connection, called sister chromatid cohesion, opposes the pulling forces that are generated by microtubules that attach to kinetochores and thereby enables the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle (Tanaka et al. 2000b). Without cohesion, sister chromatids could therefore not be segregated symmetrically between the forming daughter cells, resulting in aneuploidy. For the same reasons, cohesion is essential for chromosome segregation in meiosis I and meiosis II. Cohesion defects in human oocytes can lead to aneuploidy, which is thought to be the major cause of spontaneous abortion, because only a few types of aneuploidy are compatible with viability, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) (Hunt and Hassold 2010). Studying the mechanisms of cohesion is therefore essential for understanding how the genome is passed properly from one cell generation to the next.In addition, sister chromatid cohesion facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in cells that have replicated their DNA, where such breaks can be repaired by a homologous recombination mechanism that uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template (for review, see Watrin et al. 2006). Furthermore, mutations in the proteins that are required for sister chromatid cohesion can cause defects in chromatin structure and gene regulation, and can in rare cases lead to congenital developmental disorders, called Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Roberts/SC Phocomelia syndrome, and Warsaw Breakage syndrome (for review, see Mannini et al. 2010).     

Factors involved in differential giemsa-staining of sister chromatids

Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium, temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength) of UV-light influenced the differential staining. Exposure of blacklight of 10^–5 M Hoechst 33528-stained BrdU-labeled chromosome specimens mounted in McIlvaine buffer (pH 8.0) at 50° C reproducibly allowed differential staining of sister chromatids within 15 min. On the other hand, Korenberg-Freedlender's method using no Hoechst 33258 was also UV-light-dependent. Thus, photolysis of BrdU-substituted DNA was considered the basic mechanism of the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.