Aphid-injection experiments with carrot mottle virus and its helper virus, carrot red leaf

Carrot mottle virus (CMotV) and its helper virus, carrot red leaf (CRLV), were not transmitted by aphids (Cavariella aegopodii) that had fed through membranes on, or had been injected with, sap from mixedly infected chervil plants or partially purified preparations of CMotV. However, the viruses were transmitted by recipient aphids injected with haemolymph from donor aphids that had fed on mixedly infected plants but not by a second series of recipients injected with haemolymph from the first series. Some of the first series of recipients transmitted both viruses for up to 11 days but others transmitted erratically and many lost ability to transmit after a few days. The results confirm that both viruses are circulative but provide no evidence for multiplication in the vector. Non-viruliferous aphids, or aphids that had acquired CRLV by feeding, did not transmit CMotV when they were injected with haemolymph from aphids that had fed on a source of CMotV alone, confirming that they can only transmit CMotV when they acquire it from a mixedly infected plant. When extracts from donor aphids were treated with ether before injection, recipient aphids transmitted both CRLV and CMotV, although the infectivity of CMotV grown in Nicotiana clevelandii in the absence of CRLV is destroyed by ether treatment. CMotV particles acquired by aphids from mixedly infected plants therefore differed in some way from those in singly infected plants. A plausible explanation of these results, and of the dependence of CMotV on CRLV for aphid transmission, is that doubly infected plants contain some particles that consist of CMotV nucleic acid coated with CRLV protein.     

Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling resistance to maize chlorotic dwarf virus

Ineffective screening methods and low levels of disease resistance have hampered genetic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) resistance to disease caused by maize chlorotic dwarf virus (MCDV). Progeny from a cross between the highly resistant maize inbred line Oh1VI and the susceptible inbred line Va35 were evaluated for MCDV symptoms after multiple virus inoculations, using the viral vector Graminella nigrifrons. Symptom severity scores from three rating dates were used to calculate area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) scores for vein banding, leaf twist and tear, and whorl chlorosis. AUDPC scores for the F₂ population indicated that MCDV resistance was quantitatively inherited. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of 314 F₂ individuals were compared using composite interval mapping (CIM) and analysis of variance. CIM identified two major quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosomes 3 and 10 and two minor QTL on chromosomes 4 and 6. Resistance was additive, with alleles from Oh1VI at the loci on chromosomes 3 and 10 contributing equally to resistance.     

Comparative transmission of bean leaf roll and pea enation mosaic viruses by aphids

Acyrthosiphon pisum was a more efficient vector than Myzus persicae of bean leaf roll virus (BLRV), but the two species transmitted pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) equally well and much more often than Megoura viciae. M. viciae did not transmit BLRV, and Aphis fabae did not transmit BLRV or PEMV. BLRV and PEMV were transmitted more often by nymphs of A. pisum than by adult apterae or alatae that fed on infected plants only as adults, but both viruses were readily transmitted by adults that had developed on infected plants. The shortest time in which nymphs acquired BLRV was 2 h, and 50 % transmitted after an acquisition period of 4 days. Some nymphs acquired PEMV in 30 min and 50% in 8 h. The shortest time for inoculation of BLRV by adults was 15 min, but some transmitted PEMV in probes lasting less than 1 min. The median latent periods of BLRV and PEMV in aphids fed for 12 h on infected plants were, respectively, 105 and 44 h. Clones of A. pisum differed in their ability to transmit BLRV and PEMV, and efficiency in transmitting the two viruses seemed to be unrelated. Some aphids that fed successively on plants infected with each virus transmitted both viruses, and infectivity with one virus did not seem to affect transmission of the other.     

Relations of carrot red leaf and carrot mottle viruses with their aphid vector, Cavariella aegopodii

Studies with Scottish isolates of carrot red leaf (CRLV) and carrot mottle (CMotV) viruses confirmed the dependency of CMotV on CRLV for transmission by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii. CMotV was transmitted by aphids only when the two viruses were present in the same source plant, and its transmission was not assisted by anthriscus yellows virus, which acts as a helper for parsnip yellow fleck virus. Some test plants became infected with CRLV alone, and a few with CMotV alone. In winter, aphid transmission of CRLV and CMotV was greatly increased when the source plants received supplementary lighting whereas the CMotV infectivity of sap was not increased. C. aegopodii acquired CRLV and CMotV after minimum acquisition access times of 30 min and inoculated them after minimum inoculation access times of 2 min. There was a minimum latent period of 7–18 h. The viruses were retained by the aphid after moulting and are therefore circulative in the vector, but were not transmitted to progeny insects. Aphids allowed 24 h to acquire the viruses continued to transmit them for at least 12 days, but some aphids allowed 6 h or less for virus acquisition ceased to transmit after 3 or 4 days. CRLV is considered a tentative member of the luteovirus group.     

Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV) modifies the alighting,settling and probing behaviour of its vector Aphis gossypii favouring its own spread

Plant pathogens are able to influence the behaviour and fitness of their vectors in such a way that changes in plant–pathogen–vector interactions can affect their transmission. Such influence can be direct or indirect, depending on whether it is mediated by the presence of the pathogen in the vector's body or by host changes as a consequence of pathogen infection. We report the effect that the persistently aphid‐transmitted Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV, Polerovirus) can induce on the alighting, settling and probing behaviour activities of its vector, the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii. Only minor direct changes on aphid feeding behaviour were observed when viruliferous aphids fed on non‐infected plants. However, the feeding behaviour of non‐viruliferous aphids was very different on CABYV‐infected than on non‐infected plants. Non‐viruliferous aphids spent longer time feeding from the phloem in CABYV‐infected plants compared to non‐infected plants, suggesting that CABYV indirectly manipulates aphid feeding behaviour through its shared host plant in order to favour viral acquisition. Viruliferous aphids showed a clear preference for non‐infected over CABYV‐infected plants at short and long time, while such behaviour was not observed for non‐viruliferous aphids. Overall, our results indicate that CABYV induces changes in its host plant that modifies aphid feeding behaviour in a way that virus acquisition from infected plants is enhanced. Once the aphids become viruliferous they prefer to settle on healthy plants, leading to optimise the transmission and spread of this phloem‐limited virus.     

Cucumber Vein Yellowing Virus; Host Range and Virus Vector Relationships

Cucumber vein yellowing virus (CVYV) is transmitted by Bemisia tabaci, it has a narrow host range restricted to some cucurbitaceous plants including Cucumis sativus, C. melo, C. melo var. flexousus, Cucurbita pepo, C. foesti, Citrullus vulgaris, C. colocynthis and Lagenaria siceraria. Although a single whitefly can transmit the disease, the efficiency of transmission was low. At least 15–20 insects per plant were required to cause an infection of 55 % of inoculated plants. The minimum acquisition and inoculation feeding periods were 30 and 15 min, respectively. The latent period in the vector is about 75 min and the whitefly was infectious for not more than 5 h.     

The acquisition of a caulimovirus by different aphid species: comparison with a potyvirus

The acquisition and transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) by six aphid species and three clones of aphids was studied and compared with that of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) with Myzus persicae. Two clones of Aphis fabae were unable to transmit CaMV, but the other species, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Brevicoryne brassicae, Megoura viciae, M. persicae and Rhopalosiphum padi transmitted in a bior multi-phasic manner. There was no statistical evidence of a bimodal transmission pattern. R. padi is recorded as a vector of CaMV for the first time. The transmission efficiency of CaMV varied with time of acquisition and suggested that accumulation of the virus occurred with two peaks of efficiency within the anterior region of the insect gut. The time at which these two peaks occurred varied between the species, but the basic pattern was common to all transmitting aphid species in this study. This pattern contrasted with that of TuMV. The transmission data are discussed in terms of bimodal transmission, the influence of feeding behaviour, the role of a helper protein associated with both TuMV and CaMV and the evidence for site specific attachment of CaMV.     

Relations of the semi-persistent viruses, parsnip yellow fleck and anthriscus yellows, with their vector, Cav arietta aegopodii

Studies were made of the relations of parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV) and its helper virus, anthriscus yellows (AYV), with their aphid vector, Cavariella aegopodii. Apterous insects were more efficient vectors than alates; apterous nymphs were as efficient as apterous adults. C. aegopodii never transmitted PYFV in the absence of AYV, but aphids carrying both viruses infected some test plants with one or other virus alone. C. aegopodii that fed first on a source of AYV and then on a source of PYFV transmitted both viruses to test plants, but aphids that fed on the sources in the reverse order transmitted only AYV. Test plants receiving some aphids from a source of AYV, and others from a source of PYFV, became infected only with AYV. C. aegopodii acquired AYV or the AYV/PYFV complex from plants in a minimum acquisition access time (AAT) of 10–15 mm and inoculated the viruses to test plants in a minimum inoculation access time (IAT) of 2 min. Increasing either AAT or IAT, or both, to 1 h or longer increased the frequency of transmission of each virus. Starving the insects before the acquisition feed on AYV or AYV/PFYV sources did not affect transmission. Aphids already carrying AYV acquired PYFV from plants in a minimum AAT of only 2 min; they acquired and inoculated PYFV in a minimum total time of 12 min. The data suggest that AYV is confined to deeply lying tissues whereas PYFV is distributed throughout the leaf. C. aegopodii transmitted both PYFV and AYV in a semi-persistent manner: the aphids retained both viruses for up to 4 days but lost them on moulting. Neither virus was passed to progeny of viruliferous adults. Earlier results suggesting that AYV is a persistent virus may have been caused by contamination of the AYV culture with carrot red leaf virus.     

Biological characteristics of grass geminiviruses from eastern Australia

Two serotypes of chloris striate mosaic virus (CSMV), paspalum striate mosaic virus (PSMV) and geminiviruses infecting Bromus catharticus and Digitaria didactyla were investigated. Their field occurrence and experimental hosts are listed. Serial transmission data for CSMV by single Nesoclutha pallida show a minimum latent period of 12–14 h, and regular transmission with occasional breaks for up to 50 days. Cicadulina bimaculata did not transmit any isolates after plant feeding acquisition, but transmitted CSMV inefficiently after insect injection. The vector of PSMV was found to be a specific biotype of N. pallida which bred only on Paspalum spp. The rate of transmission of CSMV with the Chloris biotype of N. pallida and of PSMV with the Paspalum biotype reached c. 50% with single insects, but only when freshly-infected source plants were used. Geminate particles were found in thin sections of leaf tissue infected with all four viruses, and partially purified preparations were made of three of these. In gel diffusion tests, the virus from Microlaena stipoides produced a spur reaction with CSMV, when reacted with CSMV antiserum. The B. catharticus and D. didactyla isolates failed to react serologically with CSMV, maize streak or Vanuatu digitaria streak viruses.     

Metarhizium anisopliae infection reduces Trypanosoma congolense reproduction in Glossina fuscipes fuscipes and its ability to acquire or transmit the parasite

Background

Tsetse fly-borne trypanosomiasis remains a significant problem in Africa despite years of interventions and research. The need for new strategies to control and possibly eliminate trypanosomiasis cannot be over-emphasized. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) infect their hosts through the cuticle and proliferate within the body of the host causing death in about 3–14 days depending on the concentration. During the infection process, EPF can reduce blood feeding abilities in hematophagous arthropods such as mosquitoes, tsetse flies and ticks, which may subsequently impact the development and transmission of parasites. Here, we report on the effects of infection of tsetse fly (Glossina fuscipes fuscipes) by the EPF, Metarhizium anisopliae ICIPE 30 wild-type strain (WT) and green fluorescent protein-transformed strain (GZP-1) on the ability of the flies to harbor and transmit the parasite, Trypanosoma congolense.

Results

Teneral flies were fed T. congolense-infected blood for 2 h and then infected using velvet carpet fabric impregnated with conidia covered inside a cylindrical plastic tube for 12 h. Control flies were fed with T. congolense-infected blood but not exposed to the fungal treatment via the carpet fabric inside a cylindrical plastic tube. Insects were dissected at 2, 3, 5 and 7 days post-fungal exposure and the density of parasites quantified. Parasite load decreased from 8.7 × 10⁷ at day 2 to between 8.3 × 10⁴ and 1.3 × 10⁵ T. congolense ml^− 1 at day 3 post-fungal exposure in fungus-treated (WT and GZP-1) fly groups. When T. congolense-infected flies were exposed to either fungal strain, they did not transmit the parasite to mice whereas control treatment flies remained capable of parasite transmission. Furthermore, M. anisopliae-inoculated flies which fed on T. congolense-infected mice were not able to acquire the parasites at 4 days post-fungal exposure while parasite acquisition was observed in the control treatment during the same period.

Conclusions

Infection of the vector G. f. fuscipes by the entomopathogenic fungus M. anisopliae negatively affected the multiplication of the parasite T. congolense in the fly and reduced the vectorial capacity to acquire or transmit the parasite.

     

Comparison of transmission abilities of four Cicadulina species vectors of maize streak virus from Nigeria

Four Cicadulina species [Cicadulina arachidis China, Cicadulina dabrowskii Webb, Cicadulina mbila (Naude), and Cicadulina storeyi China (Homoptera: Cicadellidae)] found during field surveys in 1997–1999 across five ecological zones in Nigeria were reared in screenhouses and females were used in a study to compare their abilities to transmit Maize streak virus (Geminiviridae: genus Mastrevirus) from maize to maize using the susceptible variety Pool 16. The results showed that for both acquisition access feeding periods (AAP) and inoculation access feeding periods (IAP), transmission efficiencies decreased in the following order: C. storeyi > C. mbila > C. arachidis > C. dabrowskii. The transmission efficiencies of these vectors increased with longer feeding periods, as the means of susceptible test plants that showed Mastrevirus symptoms for both acquisition and IAPs were higher for 24 and 48 h than for 1 and 2 h for all four species studied. The epidemiological implications of these differences in transmission abilities are discussed.     

Transmission by Laodelphax striatellus Fallen of Rice black‐streaked dwarf virus from Frozen Infected Rice Leaves to Healthy Plants of Rice and Maize

Rice black‐streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV) is transmitted naturally to important crops such as rice, maize, barley and wheat in a persistent manner by the planthoppers, Laodelphax striatellus, Unkanodes sapporona and Unkanodes albifascia. Insect vector transmission tests are the basis for identifying viral incidence, evaluating the resistance of varieties and selecting resistance sources for rice and maize breeding. A simple, rapid and reliable method is described by which virus‐free small brown planthoppers (L. striatellus) acquired RBSDV from frozen infected rice leaves and transmitted it to healthy rice and maize plants. After feeding on frozen infected rice leaves, the planthoppers were tested by RT‐PCR for the presence of virus after 10, 15, and 22 days, respectively. The percentages of RBSDV‐containing insects were 0, 25 and 71.43% of L. striatellus fed on frozen infected rice leaves compared to 0, 28.25 and 71.43% of L. striatellus fed on fresh infected rice leaves, respectively. In transmission tests, three of eight rice seedlings (37.5%) and four of eight maize seedlings (50%) were inoculated by the planthoppers that had fed previously on frozen leaves and had allowed a 22 days latent period and showed typical disease symptoms. As a positive control, four of eight rice seedlings (50%) and four of six maize seedlings (66.67%) became infected. All rice and maize plants expressing disease symptoms were identified as virus‐positive by RT‐PCR. These results indicated that the planthoppers acquired RBSDV from frozen infected leaves and transmitted the virus to healthy plants.     

Vector and Host-Plant Relationships of the Leafhopper-Borne Maize Yellow Stripe Virus

Maize yellow stripe virus (MYSV), associated with tenuivirus-like filaments, is transmitted in a persistent manner by the leafhopper Cicadulina chinai. In this vector, MYSV acquisition and inoculation threshold times were 30 min each, latent period ranged from 4.5 to 8 days depending on temperature (14-25 °C), and retention periods were as long as 27 days. Up to 26 % of C, chinai collected from maize fields in Giza, Egypt, during September and October 1985 were naturally infective with MYSV. Two symptom-types (fine and coarse stripe) appeared on experimentally infected plants, usually on separate leaves of the same plant. However, these two symptom-types could not be isolated on separate plants through transmission by single C. chinai leafhoppers. MYSV was transmitted by nymphs and adults of C. chinai from maize to maize, wheat and barley, and from wheat to maize plants. Up to 6 % of the wheat plants examined in Naga Hamadi (Southern Egypt) in February 1986, were naturally infected. It is suggested that wheat, barley and possibly graminaceous weeds may serve as winter hosts or reservoirs for MYSV and its leafhopper vector in Egypt.     

Transmission of rayado fino virus of maize (Zea mays) by Dalbulus tnaidis

Rayado fino virus (RFV) of maize (Zea mays) was transmitted by the leaf-hopper Dalbulus maidis in a manner characteristic of viruses that multiply in their insect vectors. Individual insects fed on infected plants transmitted the virus after incubation periods of 8–22 days; males had shorter incubation periods than females but died sooner. Insects retained infectivity for 1–20 days. Transmission by most insects was intermittent. Inoculativity by D. maidis decreased with time, but the virus was recovered from insects that had lost their ability to transmit. Extracts of plants infected with RFV and viruliferous insects were injected into healthy insects, which became viruli-ferous. Infectivity of the extracts was not affected by tetracycline hydrochloride (Achromycin). D. maidis was able to transmit simultaneously RFV and the corn stunt agent. Other than maize, Teosinte (Euchlaena mexicana) was the only plant susceptible to the virus, among a number of species of Gramineae tested.     

Acquisition and transmission of corn stunt spiroplasma by its leafhopper vector Dalbulus maidis

As the acquisition access period of Dalbulus maidis on infected maize increased from 15 min to 7 days, the incubation period of corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS) in the insect decreased from 27 days to 8 days and the final proportion of transmitting insects increased from 5% to 100%. After 7 days access the median incubation period (IPsO) was 14.3 days (IP₅₀ females = 12.9 days: IP₅₀ males =16.8 days), while the proportion of transmitting insects increased from 4. 3% (9 days after the start of acquisition access) to a maximum of 93% (after 22 days), before decreasing. Females started transmitting significantly earlier and a greater proportion transmitted each day than males, until day 22 when both sexes transmitted equally. Of the insects which transmitted CSS, 29% did so continuously until death; 66% failed to transmit during the last 1–3 days, and 5% transmitted intermittently towards the end of their life. During daily transfer, females were more likely to infect plants consecutively (up to 25) than males, and females infected the higher proportion of test plants. As the transmission access period was increased from 1 h to 72 h, the proportion of transmitting insects increased from 22.5% to 97.3% and the incubation period in maize decreased.     

Further evidence on the nature of the dependence of carrot mottle virus on carrot red leaf virus for transmission by aphids

Preparations were made from chervil plants doubly infected with carrot mottle virus (CMotV) and its helper virus, carrot red leaf (CRLV), on which it depends for transmission by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii, by the procedure developed previously for CRLV. The preparations contained 25 nm isometric particles which were indistinguishable from those of CRLV but possessed aphid-transmissible infectivity of both viruses and manually transmissible infectivity of CMotV. Only one sedimenting and buoyant density component was detected. The manually transmissible CMotV infectivity was resistant to freezing and to organic solvents, treatments that destroyed the CMotV infectivity in extracts from singly infected plants. The aphid-transmissible CMotV infectivity in preparations from CRLV/ CMotV-infected plants, and that in extracts from CRLV/CMotV-carrying C. aegopodii, was abolished by treatment with CRLV antiserum but not with normal serum. These results show that transmission of CMotV by C. aegopodii is dependent on the packaging of its RNA in coats composed partially or entirely of CRLV particle protein. The aphid Myzus persicae does not transmit CRLV or CMotV from plants mixedly or singly infected with these viruses but it is a vector of beet western yellows virus (BWYV) and potato leafroll virus (PLRV) and it transmitted CMotV from plants that also contained either of these viruses. This suggests that the coat proteins of BWYV and PLRV can substitute for that of CRLV in packaging CMotV nucleic acid and thereby confer on it their own vector specificities.     

Aphid Transmission of Potato aucuba mosaic virus Strains Mediated by Different Strains of Potato virus Y

Three British strains of potato aucuba mosaic virus (PAMV) were tested for transmissibility by the aphid Myzus persicae. None was aphid transmissible on its own but all three were transmitted in the nonpersistent manner by aphids that had previously been fed on a source of the potyvirus potato virus Y (PVY). Different PVY strains mediated PAMV transmission from Nicotiana clevelandii to Capsicum annuum to different degrees, and different PAMV strains were transmitted at different frequencies when assisted by the same PVY strain. These results are compatible with the idea that subtle differences in the PAMV coat protein and in the PVY helper component are responsible for diffrences in frequencies of transmission of PAMV, without however, excluding the possibility of effects of other undefined factors. Transmission of PAMV was no less frequent when mediated by a PVY strain that was unable to infect C. annuum than when a C. annuum‐infecting PVY strain was used.     

Non-propagative translocation of velvet tobacco mottle virus in the mirid, Cyrtopeltis nicotianae

Nymphs of the mirid, Cyrtopeltis nicotianae became infective when injected with velvet tobacco mottle virus (VTMoV). Injections of amounts between 1 and 154 ng into the haemocoele induced 2/60 to infect test plants and these two nymphs contained 50 and 63 ng of virus respectively. Injection of amounts between 15 and 2400 ng rendered 11/47 nymphs infective. This observation is characteristic of a circulative association. However, there is no evidence that the salivary glands are involved in transmission and the virus is therefore defined as translocating, rather than circulating, in the mirid vector. Mirids which acquired infectivity by feeding lost it between 5 and 9 days after completion of acquisition, and the most rapid loss of infectivity occurred within 2 days. Nine days after acquisition none contained antigen detectable by ELISA, but detectable antigen decreased less rapidly than infectivity, and at all times more mirids contained antigen than were able to transmit. Mirids containing antigen carried between 150 and 3340 ng each. Thus, although VTMoV can be transmitted by its mirid vector following introduction of virus into the body cavity by injection, VTMoV is not propagative. Nor does the presence of virus within the mirid guarantee an ability to transmit.     

Stabilization effects of spatial aggregation of vectors in plant disease systems

Stabilization effects of spatial aggregation of vectors were examined in insect-borne plant disease systems by constructing a model that describes the yearly dynamics of rice stripe virus disease transmitted by the small brown planthopperLaodelphax striatellus (Fallén). Two transmission paths between vectors were considered: vertical transmission from parents through eggs, and horizontal transmission from infected plants by acquisition feeding. In this model, a paddy field was divided into quadrats and horizontal transmission was assumed to occur within each quadrat. A negative binomial distribution was used to describe the frequency distribution of vectors per quadrat. The parameters of the model were estimated using field data collected in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. The model showed that (1) the disease cannot invade into an epidemiological system if the mean crowding of vectors is less than a critical value, (2) the proportion of infected vectors is maintained at about 30% irrespective of the vector density if vectors are highly aggregated, and (3) the proportion of infected plants is maintained at a low level irrespective of the vector density if vectors are highly aggregated. It was also shown that these stabilization effects of aggregation in this epidemiological system come from a mechanism that is common to other systems such as single-species systems and competition systems.