An experimental method for measuring force on the spinal facet joint: description and application of the method.

A technique is described for measuring load magnitude and resultant load contact location in the facet joint in response to applied loads and moments, and the technique applied to the canine lumbar spine motion segment. Due to the cantilever beam geometry of the cranial articular process, facet joint loads result in surface strains on the lateral aspect of the cranial articular process. Strains were quantified by four strain gages cemented to the bony surface of the process. Strain measured at any one gage depended on the loading site on the articular surface of the caudal facet and on the magnitude of the facet load. Determination of facet loads during in vitro motion segment testing required calibration of the strains to known loads of various magnitudes applied to multiple sites on the caudal facet. The technique is described in detail, including placement of the strain gages. There is good repeatability of strains to applied facet loads and the strains appear independent of load distribution area. Error in the technique depends on the location of the applied facet loads, but is only significant in nonphysiologic locations. The technique was validated by two independent methods in axial torsion. Application of the technique to five in vitro canine L2-3 motion segments testing resulted in facet loads (in newtons, N) of 74+ / -23 N (mean + / -STD) in 2 newton-meter, Nm, extension, to unloaded in flexion. Lateral bending resulted in loads in the right facet of 40+ / -32 N for 1 Nm right lateral bending and 54+ / -29 N for 1 Nm left lateral bending. 4 Nm Torsion with and without 100 N axial compression resulted in facet loads of 92+ / -27 N and 69+ / -19 N, respectively. The technique is applicable to dynamic and in vivo studies.     

Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments

The load-displacement behavior of 35 fresh adult cervical spine motion segments was measured in compression, shear, flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial torsion tests. Motion segments were tested both intact and with posterior elements removed. Applied forces ranged to 73.6 N in compression and to 39 N in shear, while applied moments ranged to 2.16 Nm. For each mode of loading, principal and coupled motions were measured and stiffnesses were calculated. The effect of disc degeneration on motion segment stiffnesses and the moments required for motion segment failure were also measured. In compression, the stiffnesses of the cervical motion segments were similar to those of thoracic and lumbar motion segments. In other modes of loading, cervical stiffnesses were considerably smaller than thoracic or lumbar stiffnesses. Removal of the posterior elements decreased cervical motion segment stiffnesses by as much as 50%. Degenerated cervical discs were less stiff in compression and stiffer in shear than less degenerated discs, but in bending or axial torsion, no statistically significant differences were evident. Bending moments causing failure were an order of magnitude lower than those for lumbar segments.     

A force transducer to measure individual finger loads during activities of daily living.

A new six-degree-of-freedom force transducer has been manufactured, with the sensitivity to measure forces in the range +/-100 N and moments of up to +/-5 Nm. The transducer incorporates two mechanical components: shear forces and bending moments are measured via a strain-gauged tubular section whilst axial forces are transmitted to a cantilevered load cell. Both components are instrumented with 350 ohms strain gauge full bridge circuits and are temperature compensated. After calibration, measurement errors are less than +/-0.3 N for direct forces and +/-0.03 Nm for applied moments. In order to measure sub-maximal finger loads during activities of daily living, the transducer has been incorporated into several housings representing objects in domestic use: a jar, a tap, a key in a lock and a jug kettle.     

Effect of lumbar fasciae on the stability of the lower lumbar spine

The biomechanical effect of tensioning the lumbar fasciae (LF) on the stability of the spine during sagittal plane motion was analysed using a validated finite element model of the normal lumbosacral spine (L4-S1). To apply the tension in the LF along the direction of the fibres, a local coordinate was allocated using dummy rigid beam elements that originated from the spinous process. Up to 10 Nm of flexion and 7.5 Nm of extension moment was applied with and without 20 N of lateral tension in the LF. A follower load of 400 N was additionally applied along the curvature of the spine. To identify how the magnitude of LF tension related to the stability of the spine, the tensioning on the fasciae was increased up to 40 N with an interval of 10 N under 7.5 Nm of flexion/extension moment. A fascial tension of 20 N produced a 59% decrease in angular motion at 2.5 Nm of flexion moment while there was a 12.3% decrease at 10 Nm in the L5-S1 segment. Its decrement was 53 and 9.6% at 2.5 Nm and 10 Nm, respectively, in the L4-L5 segment. Anterior translation was reduced by 12.1 and 39.0% at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments under 10 Nm of flexion moment, respectively. The flexion stiffness shows an almost linear increment with the increase in fascial tension. The results of this study showed that the effect of the LF on the stability of the spine is significant.     

The effect of weightbearing and external loading on anterior cruciate ligament strain

A force balance between the ligaments, articular contact, muscles and body weight maintains knee joint stability. Thus, it is important to study anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) biomechanics, in vivo, under weightbearing conditions. Our objective was to compare the ACL strain response under weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions and in combination with three externally applied loadings: (1) anterior-posterior shear forces, (2) internal-external torques, and (3) varus-valgus moments. A strain transducer was implanted on the ACL of 11 subjects. All joint loadings were performed with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion. A significant increase in ACL strain was observed as the knee made the transition from non-weightbearing to weightbearing. During anterior shear loading, the strain values produced during weightbearing were greater than those of the non-weightbearing knee (shear loads <40N). At higher shear loads, the strain values became equal. During axial torsion, an internal torque of 10Nm strained the ACL when the knee was non-weightbearing while an equivalent external torque did not. Weightbearing significantly increased ACL strain values in comparison to non-weightbearing with the application of external torques and low internal torques (<3Nm). The strains became equal for higher internal torques. For V-V loading, the ACL was not strained in the non-weightbearing knee. However, weightbearing increased the ACL strain values over the range of moments tested. These data have important clinical ramifications in the development of rehabilitation protocols following ACL reconstruction since weightbearing has been previously thought to provide a protective mechanism to the healing graft.     

Inter-laboratory variability in in vitro spinal segment flexibility testing

In vitro spine flexibility testing has been performed using a variety of laboratory-specific loading apparatuses and conditions, making test results across laboratories difficult to compare. The application of pure moments has been well established for spine flexibility testing, but to our knowledge there have been no attempts to quantify differences in range of motion (ROM) resulting from laboratory-specific loading apparatuses. Seven fresh-frozen lumbar cadaveric motion segments were tested intact at four independent laboratories. Unconstrained pure moments of 7.5 Nm were applied in each anatomic plane without an axial preload. At laboratories A and B, pure moments were applied using hydraulically actuated spinal loading fixtures with either a passive (A) or controlled (B) XY table. At laboratories C and D, pure moments were applied using a sliding (C) or fixed ring (D) cable–pulley system with a servohydraulic test frame. Three sinusoidal load-unload cycles were applied at laboratories A and B while a single quasistatic cycle was applied in 1.5 Nm increments at laboratories C and D. Non-contact motion measurement systems were used to quantify ROM. In all test directions, the ROM variability among donors was greater than single-donor ROM variability among laboratories. The maximum difference in average ROM between any two laboratories was 1.5° in flexion-extension, 1.3° in lateral bending and 1.1° in axial torsion. This was the first study to quantify ROM in a single group of spinal motion segments at four independent laboratories with varying pure moment systems. These data support our hypothesis that given a well-described test method, independent laboratories can produce similar biomechanical outcomes.     

Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element

Axial compression on the spine could reach large values especially in lifting tasks which also involve large rotations. Experimental and numerical investigations on the spinal multi motion segments in presence of physiological compression loads cannot adequately be carried out due to the structural instability and artefact loads. To circumvent these problems, a novel wrapping cable element is used in a nonlinear finite element model of the lumbosacral spine (L1-S1) to investigate the role of moderate to large compression loads on the lumbar stiffness in flexion and axial moments/rotations. The compression loads up to 2,700 N was applied with no instability or artefact loads. The lumbar stiffness substantially increased under compression force, flexion moment, and axial torque when applied alone. The presence of compression preloads significantly stiffened the load-displacement response under flexion and axial moments/rotations. This stiffening effect was much more pronounced under larger preloads and smaller moments/rotations. Compression preloads also increased intradiscal pressure, facet contact forces, and maximum disc fibre strain at different levels. Forces in posterior ligaments were, however, diminished with compression preload. The significant increase in spinal stiffness, hence, should be considered in biomechanical studies for accurate investigation of the load partitioning, system stability, and fixation systems/disc prostheses.     

Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.

High anterior intervertebral shear loads could cause low back injuries and therefore the neuromuscular system may actively counteract these forces. This study investigated whether, under constant moment loading relative to L3L4, an increased externally applied forward force on the trunk results in a shift in muscle activation towards the use of muscles with more backward directed lines of action, thereby reducing the increase in total joint shear force. Twelve participants isometrically resisted forward forces, applied at several locations on the trunk, while moments were held constant relative to L3L4. Surface EMG and lumbar curvature were measured, and an EMG-driven muscle model was used to calculate compression and shear forces at all lumbar intervertebral joints. Larger externally applied forward forces resulted in a flattening of the lumbar lordosis and a slightly more backward directed muscle force. Furthermore, the overall muscle activation increased. At the T12L1 to L3L4 joint, resulting joint shear forces remained small (less than 200N) because the average muscle force pulled backward relative to those joints. However, at the L5S1 joint the average muscle force pulled the trunk forward so that the increase in muscle force with increasing externally applied forward force caused a further rise in shear force (by 102.1N, SD=104.0N), resulting in a joint shear force of 1080.1N (SD=150.4N) at 50Nm moment loading. It is concluded that the response of the neuromuscular system to shear force challenges tends to increase rather than reduce the shear loading at the lumbar joint that is subjected to the highest shear forces.     

Elevation and orientation of external loads influence trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces despite identical moments at the L5–S1 level

A wide range of loading conditions involving external forces with varying magnitudes, orientations and locations are encountered in daily activities. Here we computed the effect on trunk biomechanics of changes in force location (two levels) and orientation (5 values) in 4 subjects in upright standing while maintaining identical external moment of 15 Nm, 30 N m or 45 Nm at the L5–S1. Driven by measured kinematics and gravity/external loads, the finite element models yielded substantially different trunk neuromuscular response with moderate alterations (up to 24% under 45 Nm moment) in spinal loads as the load orientation varied. Under identical moments, compression and shear forces at the L5–S1 as well as forces in extensor thoracic muscles progressively decreased as orientation of external forces varied from downward gravity (90°) all the way to upward (−25°) orientation. In contrast, forces in local lumbar muscles followed reverse trends. Under larger horizontal forces at a lower elevation, lumbar muscles were much more active whereas extensor thoracic muscle forces were greater under smaller forces at a higher elevation. Despite such differences in activity pattern, the spinal forces remained nearly identical (<6% under 45 Nm moment). The published recorded surface EMG data of extensor muscles trend-wise agreed with computed local muscle forces as horizontal load elevation varied but were overall different from results in both local and global muscles when load orientation altered. Predictions demonstrate the marked effect of external force orientation and elevation on the trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces and questions attempts to estimate spinal loads based only on consideration of moments at a spinal level.     

Moment-rotation relationships of the ligamentous occipito-atlanto-axial complex

The relationships between applied pure moments at the occiput (C0) and the resulting rotations at the atlanto-occipital (C0-C1) and atlanto-axial (C1-C2) joints are quantified. In axial twist, with a moment of 0.3 Nm, a mean rotation of about 2.5 degrees and 23.3 degrees was observed at C0-C1 and C1-C2 units respectively. Both the atlas and axis contributed to produce lateral bending motion. The ratio between extension and flexion rotations at C0-C1 was 2.5:1. Lateral bending and axial rotations were strongly coupled to each other. The occipito-atlanto-axial complex exhibited a large 'neutral zone' compared to lower cervical spine segments. The likely clinical significance of these findings are discussed.     

Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow.

Although the contributions of passive structures to stability of the elbow have been well documented, the role of active muscular resistance of varus and valgus loads at the elbow remains unclear. We hypothesized that muscles: (1) can produce substantial varus and valgus moments about the elbow, and (2) are activated in response to sustained varus and valgus loading of the elbow. To test the first hypothesis, we developed a detailed musculoskeletal model to estimate the varus and valgus moment-generating capacity of the muscles about the elbow. To test the second hypothesis, we measured EMGs from 11 muscles in four subjects during a series of isometric tasks that included flexion, extension, varus, and valgus moments about the elbow. The EMG recordings were used as inputs to the elbow model to estimate the contributions of individual muscles to flexion-extension and varus-valgus moments. Analysis of the model revealed that nearly all of the muscles that cross the elbow are capable of producing varus or valgus moments; the capacity of the muscles to produce varus moment (34 Nm) and valgus moment (35 Nm) is roughly half of the maximum flexion moment (70 Nm). Analysis of the measured EMGs showed that the anconeus was the most significant contributor to valgus moments and the pronator teres was the largest contributor to varus moments. Although our results show that muscles were activated in response to static varus and valgus loads, their activations were modest and were not sufficient to balance the applied load.     

In vitro axial preload application during spine flexibility testing: towards reduced apparatus-related artefacts

Presently, there is little consensus about how, or even if, axial preload should be incorporated in spine flexibility tests in order to simulate the compressive loads naturally present in vivo. Some preload application methods are suspected of producing unwanted “artefact” forces as the specimen rotates and, in doing so, influencing the resulting kinematics. The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare four distinct types of preload which have roots in contemporary experimental practice. The specific quantities compared were the reaction moments and forces resulting at the intervertebral disc and specimen kinematics. The preload types incorporated increasing amounts of caudal constraint on the preload application vector ranging from an unconstrained dead-load arrangement to an apparatus that allowed the vector to follow rotations of the specimen. Six human cadaveric spine segments were tested (1-L1/L2, 3-L2/L3, 1-L3/L4 and 1-L4/L5). Pure moments were applied to the specimens with each of the four different types of compressive preload. Kinematic response was measured using an opto-electronic motion analysis system. A six-axis load cell was used to measure reaction forces and moments. Artefact reaction moments and shear forces were significantly affected by preload application method and magnitude. Unconstrained preload methods produced high artefact moments and low artefact shear forces while more constrained methods did the opposite. A mechanical trade-off is suggested by our results, whereby unwanted moment can only be prevented at the cost of shear force production. When comparing spine flexibility studies, caution should be exercised to ensure preload was applied in a similar manner for all studies. Unwanted moments or forces induced as a result of preload application method may render the comparison of two seemingly similar studies inappropriate.     

The effect of follower load on the intersegmental coupled motion characteristics of the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using entire rib cage specimens

The mechanical coupling behaviour of the thoracic spine is still not fully understood. For the validation of numerical models of the thoracic spine, however, the coupled motions within the single spinal segments are of importance to achieve high model accuracy. In the present study, eight fresh frozen human thoracic spinal specimens (C7-L1, mean age 54 ± 6 years) including the intact rib cage were loaded with pure bending moments of 5 Nm in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) with and without a follower load of 400 N. During loading, the relative motions of each vertebra were monitored. Follower load decreased the overall ROM (T1-T12) significantly (p < 0.01) in all primary motion directions (extension: −46%, left LB: −72%, right LB: −72%, left AR: −26%, right AR: −26%) except flexion (−36%). Substantial coupled motion was found in lateral bending with ipsilateral axial rotation, which increased after a follower load was applied, leading to a dominant axial rotation during primary lateral bending, while all other coupled motions in the different motion directions were reduced under follower load. On the monosegmental level, the follower load especially reduced the ROM of the upper thoracic spine from T1-T2 to T4-T5 in all motion directions and the ROM of the lower thoracic spine from T9-T10 to T11-T12 in primary lateral bending. The facet joints, intervertebral disc morphologies, and the sagittal curvature presumably affect the thoracic spinal coupled motions depending on axial compressive preloading. Using these results, the validation of numerical models can be performed more accurately.     

Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine

The facet joint contributes to the normal biomechanical function of the spine by transmitting loads and limiting motions via articular contact. However, little is known about the contact pressure response for this joint. Such information can provide a quantitative measure of the facet joint's local environment. The objective of this study was to measure facet pressure during physiologic bending in the cervical spine, using a joint capsule-sparing technique. Flexion and extension bending moments were applied to six human cadaveric cervical spines. Global motions (C2-T1) were defined using infra-red cameras to track markers on each vertebra. Contact pressure in the C5-C6 facet was also measured using a tip-mounted pressure transducer inserted into the joint space through a hole in the postero-inferior region of the C5 lateral mass. Facet contact pressure increased by 67.6 ± 26.9 kPa under a 2.4 Nm extension moment and decreased by 10.3 ± 9.7 kPa under a 2.7 Nm flexion moment. The mean rotation of the overall cervical specimen motion segments was 9.6 ± 0.8° and was 1.6 ± 0.7° for the C5-C6 joint, respectively, for extension. The change in pressure during extension was linearly related to both the change in moment (51.4 ± 42.6 kPa/Nm) and the change in C5-C6 angle (18.0 ± 108.9 kPa/deg). Contact pressure in the inferior region of the cervical facet joint increases during extension as the articular surfaces come in contact, and decreases in flexion as the joint opens, similar to reports in the lumbar spine despite the difference in facet orientation in those spinal regions. Joint contact pressure is linearly related to both sagittal moment and spinal rotation. Cartilage degeneration and the presence of meniscoids may account for the variation in the pressure profiles measured during physiologic sagittal bending. This study shows that cervical facet contact pressure can be directly measured with minimal disruption to the joint and is the first to provide local pressure values for the cervical joint in a cadaveric model.     

The use of surface strain data and a neural networks solution method to determine lumbar facet joint loads during in vitro spine testing

A new method for determining facet loads during in vitro spine loading using strain gauges and a neural networks solution method was investigated. A test showed that the new solution method was more robust than and as accurate as a previously presented graphical solution method for computing facet loads using surface strain. The technique was subsequently utilized to assess facet loads at L1-L2 during flexibility testing [7.5Nm pure moments in flexion (FL), extension (EX), right and left axial rotation (AR), and right and left lateral bending (LB)], and stiffness testing (FL-EX with 400N compressive follower load) of six human lumbar spine segments (T12-L2). In contrast to other techniques, such as thin film sensors or pressure-sensitive film, the strain-gauge method leaves the facet joint capsule intact during data collection, presumably allowing more natural load transmission. During flexibility tests, the mean (+/-standard deviation) calculated facet loads (in N) were 46.1+/-41.3 (FL), 51.5+/-39.0 (EX), 70.3+/-43.2 (AR-contralateral side), 31.3+/-33.4 (AR-ipsilateral side), 30.6+/-29.1 (LB-contralateral side), and 32.0+/-44.4 (LB-ipsilateral side). During stiffness tests, the calculated facet loads were 45.5+/-40.4 (upright), 46.6+/-41.9 (full FL), and 75.4+/-39.0 (full EX), corresponding to an equivalent of 11.4%, 11.6%, and 18.8% of the compressive follower load (upright, full FL and EX, respectively). The error associated with this technique, which was below 11N for loads up to 125N, is comparable to that reported with other techniques. The new method shows promise for assessing facet load during in vitro spine testing, an important parameter when evaluating new implant systems and surgical techniques.     

Pure moment testing for spinal biomechanics applications: fixed versus 3D floating ring cable-driven test designs

Pure moment testing has become a standard protocol for in vitro assessment of the effect of surgical techniques or devices on the bending rigidity of the spine. Of the methods used for pure moment testing, cable-driven set-ups are popular due to their low requirements and simple design. Fixed loading rings are traditionally used in conjunction with these cable-driven systems. However, the accuracy and validity of the loading conditions applied with fixed ring designs have raised some concern, and discrepancies have been found between intended and prescribed loading conditions for flexion-extension. This study extends this prior work to include lateral bending and axial torsion, and compares this fixed ring design with a novel "3D floating ring" design. A complete battery of multi-axial bending tests was conducted with both rings in multiple different configurations using an artificial lumbar spine. Applied moments were monitored and recorded by a multi-axial load cell at the base of the specimen. Results indicate that the fixed ring design deviates as much as 77% from intended moments and induces non-trivial shear forces (up to 18 N) when loaded to a non-destructive maximum of 4.5 Nm. The novel 3D floating ring design largely corrects the inherent errors in the fixed ring design by allowing additional directions of unconstrained motion and producing uniform loading conditions along the length of the specimen. In light of the results, it is suggested that the 3D floating ring set-up be used for future pure moment spine biomechanics applications using a cable-driven apparatus.     

The effect of axial compression and distraction on cervical facet mechanics during anterior shear,flexion, axial rotation,and lateral bending motions

The subaxial cervical facets are important load-bearing structures, yet little is known about their mechanical response during physiological or traumatic intervertebral motion. Facet loading likely increases when intervertebral motions are superimposed with axial compression forces, increasing the risk of facet fracture. The aim of this study was to measure the mechanical response of the facets when intervertebral axial compression or distraction is superimposed on constrained, non-destructive shear, bending and rotation motions. Twelve C6/C7 motion segments (70 ± 13 yr, nine male) were subjected to constrained quasi-static anterior shear (1 mm), axial rotation (4°), flexion (10°), and lateral bending (5°) motions. Each motion was superimposed with three axial conditions: (1) 50 N compression; (2) 300 N compression (simulating neck muscle contraction); and, (3) 2.5 mm distraction. Angular deflections, and principal and shear surface strains, of the bilateral C6 inferior facets were calculated from motion-capture data and rosette strain gauges, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05) assessed the effect of axial condition. Minimum principal and maximum shear strains were largest in the compressed condition for all motions except for maximum principal strains during axial rotation. For right axial rotation, maximum principal strains were larger for the contralateral facets, and minimum principal strains were larger for the left facets, regardless of axial condition. Sagittal deflections were largest in the compressed conditions during anterior shear and lateral bending motions, when adjusted for facet side.     

A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo

The bending properties of cadaveric lumbar spines were measured and used to convert in vivo measurements of lumbar flexion into bending moments ('stresses'). Forty-two lumbar motion segments were subjected to complex physiological loading and graphs were obtained of bending moment vs flexion angle. Variability was reduced by expressing both variables as a percentage of their values at the elastic limit. Data were averaged for each lumbar level, and a composite bending curve was compiled for the lumbar spine, L1-S1. A linear relationship was established between lumbar flexion measured in vitro and in vivo. This enabled values of 'per cent lumbar flexion' measured in vivo to be converted into 'per cent maximum bending moment' with a maximum likely error of about +/- 8%, which is equivalent to about +/- 5 Nm at L5-S1 for an average person. The technique was applied to 28 subjects, using dynamic measurements of lumbar flexion obtained with the '3-Space Isotrack' system. The bending moment at L5-S1 was 12 Nm on average when picking a pen up off the floor. Highly significant increases in bending moment were observed when heavier and bulkier objects were lifted.     

Validation of method for analysing mechanics of unloader brace for medial knee osteoarthritis

Unloader braces are one non-invasive treatment of knee osteoarthritis, which primarily function by applying an external abduction moment to the joint to reduce loads in the medial compartment of the knee. We developed a novel method using brace deflection to estimate the mechanical effect of valgus braces and validated this model using strain gauge instrumentation.Three subjects performed static and walking trials, in which the moment applied by an instrumented brace was calculated using the deflection and strain methods. The deflection method predicted average brace moments of 8.7 Nm across static trials; mean error between the deflection model predictions and the gold-standard strain gauge measurements was 0.32 Nm. Mean brace moment predictions throughout gait ranged from 7.1 to 8.7 Nm using the deflection model. Maximum differences (MAE) over the gait cycle in mean and peak brace moments between methods were 1.50 Nm (0.96) and 0.60 Nm (0.42).Our proposed method enables quantification of brace abduction moments without the use of custom instrumentation. While the deflection-based method is similar to that implemented by Schmalz et al. (2010), the proposed method isolates abduction deflection from the 3 DOF angular changes that occur within the brace. Though the model should be viewed with more caution during swing (MAE = 1.16 Nm), it was shown that the accuracy is influenced by the uncertainty in angle measurement due to cluster spacing. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that the deflection-based method developed can predict comparable brace moments to those of the previously established strain method.     

Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine

Finite element (FE) modeling is an important tool for studying the cervical spine in normal, injured and diseased conditions. To understand the role of mechanical changes on the spine as it goes from a normal to a diseased or injured state, experimental studies are needed to establish the external response of young, normal cervical spinal segments compared to injured or degenerated cervical spinal segments under physiologic loading. It is important to differentiate injured or degenerated specimens from young, normal specimens to provide accurate experimental results necessary for the validation of FE models. This study used seven young, normal fresh adult cadaver cervical spine segments C2-T1 ranging in age from 20 to 51 years. Prior to testing, the spines were graded in three ways: specimen quality, facet degeneration and disc degeneration. Spine segments were tested in flexion/extension, and the range of loads applied to the specimens was 0.33, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 Nm. These loads resulted in rotations in the direction of loading as the primary response to loading. In general, results for young, normal specimens showed greater flexibility in flexion and less flexibility in extension than results previously reported in the literature. The flexion/extension curves are asymmetric with a greater magnitude in flexion than in extension. These experimental results will be used to validate FE models of young, normal cervical spines.