Replacement of the Bacteriophage Mu Strong Gyrase Site and Effect on Mu DNA Replication

The bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS) is required for efficient replicative transposition and functions by promoting the synapsis of prophage termini. To look for other sites which could substitute for the SGS in promoting Mu replication, we have replaced the SGS in the middle of the Mu genome with fragments of DNA from various sources. A central fragment from the transposing virus D108 allowed efficient Mu replication and was shown to contain a strong gyrase site. However, neither the strong gyrase site from the plasmid pSC101 nor the major gyrase site from pBR322 could promote efficient Mu replication, even though the pSC101 site is a stronger gyrase site than the Mu SGS as assayed by cleavage in the presence of gyrase and the quinolone enoxacin. To look for SGS-like sites in the Escherichia coli chromosome which might be involved in organizing nucleoid structure, fragments of E. coli chromosomal DNA were substituted for the SGS: first, repeat sequences associated with gyrase binding (bacterial interspersed mosaic elements), and, second, random fragments of the entire chromosome. No fragments were found that could replace the SGS in promoting efficient Mu replication. These results demonstrate that the gyrase sites from the transposing phages possess unusual properties and emphasize the need to determine the basis of these properties.     

Genetic analysis of the strong gyrase site (SGS) of bacteriophage Mu: localization of determinants required for promoting Mu replication

The Mu strong gyrase site (SGS), located in the centre of the Mu genome, is required for efficient Mu replication, as it promotes synapsis of the prophage termini. Other gyrase sites tested, even very strong ones, were unable to substitute for the SGS in Mu replication. To determine the features required for its unique properties, a deletion analysis was performed on the SGS. For this analysis, we defined the 20 bp centred on the midpoint of the 4 bp staggered cleavage made by gyrase to be the 'core' and the flanking sequences to be the 'arms'. The deletion analysis showed that (i) approximately 40 bp of the right arm is required, in addition to core sequences, for both efficient Mu replication and gyrase cleavage; and (ii) the left arm was not required for efficient Mu replication, although it was required for efficient gyrase cleavage. These observations implicated the right arm as the unique feature of the SGS. The second observation showed that strong gyrase cleavage and Mu replication could be dissociated and suggested that even weak gyrase sites, if supplied with the right arm of the SGS, could promote Mu replication. Hybrid sites were constructed with gyrase sites that could not support efficient Mu replication. The SGS right arm was used to replace one arm of the strong pSC101 gyrase site or the weaker pBR322 site. The pSC101 hybrid site allowed efficient Mu replication, whereas the pBR322 hybrid site allowed substantial, but reduced, replication. Hence, it appears that optimal Mu replication requires a central strong gyrase site with the properties imparted by the right arm sequences. Possible roles for the SGS right arm in Mu replication are addressed.     

A biochemical analysis of the interaction of DNA gyrase with the bacteriophage Mu, pSC101 and pBR322 strong gyrase sites: the role of DNA sequence in modulating gyrase supercoiling and biological activity

Replication of bacteriophage Mu DNA, a process requiring efficient synapsis of the prophage ends, takes place within the confines of the Escherichia coli nucleoid. Critical to ensuring rapid synapsis is the function of the SGS, a strong gyrase site, located at the centre of the Mu genome. Replacement of the SGS by the strong gyrase sites from pSC101 or pBR322 fails to support efficient prophage replication. To probe the unique SGS properties we undertook a biochemical analysis of the interaction of DNA gyrase with the Mu SGS, pSC101 and pBR322 sites. In binding and cleavage assays the order of efficacy was pSC101 > Mu SGS > pBR322. However, in supercoiling assays the Mu SGS (cloned into pUC19) exhibited a strong enhancement of gyrase-catalysed supercoiling over pUC19 alone; the pSC101 site showed none and the pBR322 site gave a moderate improvement. Most striking was the Mu SGS-dependent increase in processivity of the gyrase reaction. This highly processive supercoiling coupled with efficient binding may account for the unique biological properties of the SGS. The results emphasize the importance of the DNA substrate as an active component in modulating the gyrase supercoiling reaction, and in determining the biological roles of specialized gyrase sites.     

Synchronization of bacteriophage Mu DNA replicative transposition: analysis of the first round after induction.

The lytic cycle of bacteriophage Mu includes a large number of coupled DNA replication and integration events, each of which is equivalent in several respects to the process of transposition of genetic elements. To aid us in studying the process of Mu DNA replicative transposition, we developed a technique for synchronizing the first round of replication following induction of a lysogen. Synchronization was achieved by inducing a lysogen in the absence of DNA replication for a time sufficient to develop the potential for Mu DNA replication in all cells in the population; upon release of the inhibition of replication, a synchronized round of Mu DNA replication was observed. Development of the potential for Mu DNA replication in the entire population took approximately 12 min. Protein synthesis was required for development of the potential, but the requirement for protein synthesis was satisfied by approximately 9 min suggesting that other, as yet unspecified, reactions occupied the last 3 min. Replication proceeded predominantly from the left end of the prophage, though a significant amount of initiation from the right end was observed. The usefulness of the technique for studying the mechanism of replicative transposition and the end products of a single round of replication are discussed.     

Characteristics of MuA transposase-catalyzed processing of model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates

Bacteriophage Mu uses non-replicative transposition for integration into the host's chromosome and replicative transposition for phage propagation. Biochemical and structural comparisons together with evolutionary considerations suggest that the Mu transposition machinery might share functional similarities with machineries of the systems that are known to employ a hairpin intermediate during the catalytic steps of transposition. Model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates were used in a minimal-component in vitro system to study their proficiency to promote Mu transpososome assembly and subsequent MuA-catalyzed chemical reactions leading to the strand transfer product. MuA indeed was able to assemble hairpin substrates into a catalytically competent transpososome, open the hairpin ends and accurately join the opened ends to the target DNA. The hairpin opening and transposon end cleavage reactions had identical metal ion preferences, indicating similar conformations within the catalytic center for these reactions. Hairpin length influenced transpososome assembly as well as catalysis: longer loops were more efficient in these respects. In general, MuA's proficiency to utilize different types of hairpin substrates indicates a certain degree of flexibility within the transposition machinery core. Overall, the results suggest that non-replicative and replicative transposition systems may structurally and evolutionarily be more closely linked than anticipated previously.     

The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage.

The phage Mu transpositional enhancer has been previously shown to stimulate the initial rate of the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction by a factor of 100. We now show that the Mu enhancer can function in trans on an unlinked DNA molecule. This activity is greatly facilitated by the presence of a free DNA end proximal to the enhancer element. Function of the enhancer in trans does not alter either the requirement for donor DNA supercoiling or for the two Mu ends to be in their proper orientation on the donor plasmid. An important consequence of these findings is that we have been able to evaluate directly the step in the transposition reaction for which the enhancer is required. We show that the role of the enhancer is limited to promoting productive synapsis; efficient strand cleavage can occur in the absence of the enhancer.     

Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

We have examined the effects of a T----C point mutation at the terminal nucleotide of the Mu ends in a mini-Mu plasmid on the early steps in the in vitro transposition reaction. These mutations inhibit the introduction of nicks at the Mu ends in a reaction with Mu A, HU, and integration host factor proteins. The presence of the point mutation at either the left end or the right end is sufficient to block the nicking reaction at both ends, indicating that the reaction is normally concerted. Addition of Mu B and ATP, however, dramatically stimulates the reaction of mutant mini-Mu plasmids carrying the mutation at one end but not at both ends. The data suggest that the Mu B protein mediates its effect through direct interaction with Mu A and that Mu B may play a role in an earlier step in the transposition process than previously proposed. In the presence of Mu B, two products are observed with the left end or right end mutant mini-Mu plasmids, a normal protein-DNA intermediate (Type 1 complex) which contains nicks at both Mu ends and an abortive product composed of free relaxed plasmid which is nicked only at the wild-type end. Furthermore, stable protein-DNA complexes characteristic of the first step in the in vitro transposition reaction are not observed in the absence of nicking or when only one end is a nicked; the introduction of nicks at both Mu ends is a prerequisite for stable transpososome assembly.     

IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations.

Transposon Tn10 and its component insertion sequence IS10 move by non-replicative transposition. We have studied the array of reaction intermediates and products in a high efficiency in vitro IS10/Tn10 transposition reaction. Synapsis of two transposon ends, followed by cleavage and strand transfer, can occur very efficiently irrespective of the relative locations and orientations of the two ends. The two participating ends can occur in inverted or direct orientation on the same molecule or, most importantly, on two different molecules. This behavior contrasts sharply with that of Mu, in which transposition is strongly biased in favor of inverted repeat synapsis. Mechanistically, the absence of discrimination amongst various end configurations implies that the architecture within the IS10/Tn10 synaptic complex is relatively simple, i.e. lacking any significant intertwining of component DNA strands. Biologically these observations are important because they suggest that the IS10 insertion sequence module has considerable flexibility in the types of DNA rearrangements that it can promote. Most importantly, it now seems highly probable that a single non-replicative IS10 element can promote DNA rearrangements usually attributed to replicative transposition, i.e. adjacent deletions and cointegrates, by utilizing transposon ends on two sister chromosomes. Other events which probably also contribute to the diversity of IS10/Tn10-promoted rearrangements are discussed.     

Mu-like prophage strong gyrase site sequences: analysis of properties required for promoting efficient mu DNA replication

The bacteriophage Mu genome contains a centrally located strong gyrase site (SGS) that is required for efficient prophage replication. To aid in studying the unusual properties of the SGS, we sought other gyrase sites that might be able to substitute for the SGS in Mu replication. Five candidate sites were obtained by PCR from Mu-like prophage sequences present in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Sakai, Haemophilus influenzae Rd, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18, and two strains of Neisseria meningitidis. Each of the sites was used to replace the natural Mu SGS to form recombinant prophages, and the effects on Mu replication and host lysis were determined. The site from the E. coli prophage supported markedly enhanced replication and host lysis over that observed with a Mu derivative lacking the SGS, those from the N. meningitidis prophages allowed a small enhancement, and the sites from the Haemophilus and Salmonella prophages gave none. Each of the candidate sites was cleaved specifically by E. coli DNA gyrase both in vitro and in vivo. Supercoiling assays performed in vitro, with the five sites or the Mu SGS individually cloned into a pUC19 reporter plasmid, showed that the Mu SGS and the E. coli or N. meningitidis sequences allowed an enhancement of processive, gyrase-dependent supercoiling, whereas the H. influenzae or Salmonella serovar Typhi sequences did not. While consistent with a requirement for enhanced processivity of supercoiling for a site to function in Mu replication, these data suggest that other factors are also important. The relevance of these observations to an understanding of the function of the SGS is discussed.     

The cis-acting DNA sequences required in vivo for bacteriophage Mu helper-mediated transposition and packaging

The 37,000 bp double-stranded DNA genome of bacteriophage Mu behaves as a plaque-forming transposable element of Escherichia coli. We have defined the cis-acting DNA sequences required in vivo for transposition and packaging of the viral genome by monitoring the transposition and maturation of Mu DNA-containing pSC101 and pBR322 plasmids with an induced helper Mu prophage to provide the trans-acting functions. We found that nucleotides 1 to 54 of the Mu left end define an essential domain for transposition, and that sequences between nucleotides 126 and 203, and between 203 and 1,699, define two auxiliary domains that stimulate transposition in vivo. At the right extremity, the essential sequences for transposition require not more than the first 62 base pairs (bp), although the presence of sequences between 63 and 117 bp from the right end increases the transposition frequency about 15-fold in our system. Finally, we have delineated the pac recognition site for DNA maturation to nucleotides 32 to 54 of the Mu left end which reside inside of the first transposase binding site (L1) located between nucleotides 1–30. Thus, the transposase binding site and packaging domains of bacteriophage Mu DNA can be separated into two well-defined regions which do not appear to overlap.Abbreviations attL attachment site left - attR attachment site right - bp base pairs - Kb kilobase pair - nt nucleotide - Pu Purine - Py pyrimidine - Tn transposable element State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11204 USA     

Neighboring plasmid sequences can affect Mini-Mu DNA transposition in the absence of expression of the bacteriophage Mu semi-essential early region

Bacteriophage Mu DNA, like other transposable elements, requires DNA sequences at both extremities to transpose. It has been previously demonstrated that the transposition activity of various transposons can be influenced by sequences outside their ends. We have found that alterations in the neighboring plasmid sequences near the right extremity of a Mini-Mu, inserted in the plasmid pSC101, can exert an influence on the efficiency of Mini-Mu DNA transposition when an induced helper Mu prophage contains a polar insertion in its semi-essential early region (SEER). The SEER of Mu is known to contain several genes that can affect DNA transposition, and our results suggest that some function(s), located in the SEER of Mu, may be required for optimizing transposition (and thus, replication) of Mu genomes from restrictive locations during the lytic cycle.     

The protelomerase of the phage-plasmid N15 is responsible for its maintenance in linear form

The prophage of coliphage N15 is not integrated into the bacterial chromosome but exists as a linear plasmid molecule with covalently closed ends. Upon infection of an Escherichia coli cell, the phage DNA circularises via cohesive ends. A phage-encoded enzyme, protelomerase, then cuts at another site, telRL, and forms hairpin ends (telomeres). We demonstrate that this enzyme acts in vivo on specific substrates, and show that it is necessary for replication of the linear prophage. We show that protelomerase is an end-resolving enzyme responsible for processing of replicative intermediates. Removal of protelomerase activity resulted in accumulation of replicative intermediates that were found to be circular head-to-head dimers. N15 protelomerase and its target site constitute a functional unit acting on other replicons independently of other phage genes; a mini-F or mini-P1 plasmid carrying this unit replicates as a linear plasmid with covalently closed ends. Our results suggest the following model of N15 prophage DNA replication. Replication is initiated at an internal ori site located close to the left end of plasmid DNA and proceeds bidirectionally. After replication of the left telomere, protelomerase cuts this sequence and forms two hairpin loops telL. After duplication of the right telomere (telR) the same enzyme resolves this sequence producing two linear plasmids. Alternatively, full replication of the linear prophage to form a circular head-to-head dimer may precede protelomerase-mediated formation of hairpin ends.     

Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism.

Central to transposition of phage Mu are two reactions mediated by the MuA protein. First, MuA introduces single-stranded cuts at the ends of the Mu DNA to generate 3' OH termini. In the subsequent strand-transfer step, the MuA-Mu DNA end complex cuts a target DNA and joins the Mu 3' ends to the 5' ends of the target. DNA containing chiral phosphorothioates was used to demonstrate inversion of the chirality during the course of strand transfer. This result strongly supports a one-step transesterification mechanism in which the 3' OH of the cleaved donor DNA is the attacking nucleophile. Furthermore, this donor 3' OH group was essential for target DNA cleavage. In contrast, during lambda integration the phosphate chirality was retained, as expected for a two-step transesterification involving a covalent protein-DNA intermediate.     

Two mutations of phage mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains.

Two mutations within the transposase (the A protein) gene of phage Mu with distinct effects on DNA transposition have been studied. The first mutation maps to the central domain (domain II) of A, a protein consisting of three major structural domains. The variant protein is normal in synapsis and cleavage of Mu ends but is temperature-sensitive in the strand transfer reaction, joining the Mu ends to target DNA. The second mutation is a deletion at the C terminus (within domain III); on the basis of genetic studies, the mutant protein is predicted to have lost the ability to interact with the Mu B protein. The B protein, in conjunction with A, promotes efficient intermolecular transposition, while inhibiting intramolecular transposition. We show that the purified mutant protein is proficient in intramolecular, but not intermolecular transposition in vitro. The interactions between A and B proteins have been followed by a proteolysis assay. The chymotrypsin sensitivity of the interdomainal Phe221-Ser222 peptide bond within the bidomainally organized B protein is exquisitely modulated by ATP, DNA and A protein. The sensitive or "open" state of this bond in native B protein becomes partially "open" upon binding of ATP by B, attains a "closed" or resistant configuration upon binding of DNA in presence of ATP, and is rendered "open" again upon addition of the A protein. In this test for the interaction of A protein with B protein-DNA complex, the domain II mutant behaves like wild-type A protein. However, the domain III mutant fails to restore chymotrypsin susceptibility of the Phe221-Ser222 bond.     

Differential role of the Mu B protein in phage Mu integration vs. replication: mechanistic insights into two transposition pathways

The Mu B protein is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and an allosteric activator of the Mu transposase. As a result of these activities, Mu B is instrumental in efficient transposition and target-site choice. We analysed in vivo the role of Mu B in the two different recombination reactions performed by phage Mu: non-replicative transposition, the pathway used during integration, and replicative transposition, the pathway used during lytic growth. Utilizing a sensitive PCR-based assay for Mu transposition, we found that Mu B is not required for integration, but enhances the rate and extent of the process. Furthermore, three different mutant versions of Mu B, Mu BC99Y, Mu BK106A, and Mu B1-294, stimulate integration to a similar level as the wild-type protein. In contrast, these mutant proteins fail to support Mu growth. This deficiency is attributable to a defect in formation of an essential intermediate for replicative transposition. Biochemical analysis of the Mu B mutant proteins reveals common features: the mutants retain the ability to stimulate transposase, but are defective in DNA binding and target DNA delivery. These data indicate that activation of transposase by Mu B is sufficient for robust non-replicative transposition. Efficient replicative transposition, however, demands that the Mu B protein not only activate transposase, but also bind and deliver the target DNA.     

Regulation of bacteriophage Mu transposition

Bacteriophage Mu is a transposon and a temperate phage which has become a paradigm for the study of the molecular mechanism of transposition. As a prophage, Mu has also been used to study some aspects of the influence of the host cell growth phase on the regulation of transposition. Through the years several host proteins have been identified which play a key role in the replication of the Mu genome by successive rounds of replicative transposition as well as in the maintenance of the repressed prophage state. In this review we have attempted to summarize all these findings with the purpose of emphasizing the benefit the virus and the host cell can gain from those phage-host interactions.     

Analysis of P element transposase protein-DNA interactions during the early stages of transposition

P elements are a family of transposable elements found in Drosophila that move by using a cut-and-paste mechanism and that encode a transposase protein that uses GTP as a cofactor for transposition. Here we used atomic force microscopy to visualize the initial interaction of transposase protein with P element DNA. The transposase first binds to one of the two P element ends, in the presence or absence of GTP, prior to synapsis. In the absence of GTP, these complexes remain stable but do not proceed to synapsis. In the presence of GTP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs, synapsis happens rapidly, whereas DNA cleavage is slow. Both atomic force microscopy and standard biochemical methods have been used to show that the P element transposase exists as a pre-formed tetramer that initially binds to either one of the two P element ends in the absence of GTP prior to synapsis. This initial single end binding may explain some of the aberrant P element-induced rearrangements observed in vivo, such as hybrid end insertion. The allosteric effect of GTP in promoting synapsis by P element transposase may be to orient a second site-specific DNA binding domain in the tetramer allowing recognition of a second high affinity transposase-binding site at the other transposon end.     

Dissection of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS): significance of the SGS right arm in Mu biology and DNA gyrase mechanism

The bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS), required for efficient phage DNA replication, differs from other gyrase sites in the efficiency of gyrase binding coupled with a highly processive supercoiling activity. Genetic studies have implicated the right arm of the SGS as a key structural feature for promoting rapid Mu replication. Here, we show that deletion of the distal portion of the right arm abolishes efficient binding, cleavage, and supercoiling by DNA gyrase in vitro. DNase I footprinting analysis of the intact SGS revealed an adenylyl imidodiphosphate-dependent change in protection in the right arm, indicating that this arm likely forms the T segment that is passed through the cleaved G segment during the supercoiling reaction. Furthermore, in an SGS derivative with an altered right-arm sequence, the left arm showed these changes, suggesting that the selection of a T segment by gyrase is determined primarily by the sequences of the arms. Analysis of the sequences of the SGS and other gyrase sites suggests that the choice of T segment correlates with which arm possesses the more extensive set of phased anisotropic bending signals, with the Mu right arm possessing an unusually extended set of such signals. The implications of these observations for the structure of the gyrase-DNA complex and for the biological function of the Mu SGS are discussed.