Autoinduction of nuclear hormone receptors during metamorphosis and its significance

Metamorphosis is a most dramatic example of hormonally regulated genetic reprogramming during postembryonic development. The initiation and sustenance of the process are under the control of ecdysteroids in invertebrates and thyroid hormone, 3,3', 5-triiodothyronine, in oviparous vertebrates. Their actions are inhibited or potentiated by other endogenous or exogenous hormones - juvenile hormone in invertebrates and prolactin and glucocorticoids in vertebrates. The nuclear receptors for ecdysteroids and thyroid hormone are the most closely related members of the steroid/retinoid/thyroid hormone receptor supergene family. In many pre-metamorphic amphibia and insects, the onset of natural metamorphosis and the administration of the exogenous hormones to the early larvae are characterized by a substantial and rapid autoinduction of the respective nuclear receptors. This review will largely deal with the phenomenon of receptor autoinduction during amphibian metamorphosis, although many of its features resemble those in insect metamorphosis.In the frog Xenopus, thyroid hormone receptor autoinduction has been shown to be brought about by the direct interaction between the receptor protein and the thyroid-responsive elements in the promoter of its own gene. Three lines of evidence point towards the involvement of receptor autoinduction in the process of initiation of amphibian metamorphosis: (1) a close association between the extent of inhibition or potentiation by prolactin and glucocorticoid, respectively, and metamorphic response in whole tadpoles and in organ and cell cultures; (2) thyroid hormone fails to upregulate the expression of its own receptor in obligatorily neotenic amphibia but does so in facultatively neotenic amphibia; and (3) dominant-negative receptors known to block hormonal response prevent the autoinduction of wild-type Xenopus receptors in vivo and in cell lines.Autoinduction is not restricted to insect and amphibian metamorphic hormones but is also a characteristic of other nuclear receptors (e.g., retinoid, sex steroids, vitamin D(3) receptors) where the ligand is involved in a postembryonic developmental function. A wider significance of such receptor autoregulation is that the process may also be important for mammalian postembryonic development.     

The GCR1, GPA1, PRN1, NF-Y signal chain mediates both blue light and abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis

Different classes of biotic (e.g. plant hormones) and abiotic (e.g. different wavelengths of light) signals act through specific signal transduction mechanisms to coordinate higher plant development. While a great deal of progress has been made, full signal transduction chains have not yet been described for most blue light- or abscisic acid-mediated events. Based on data derived from T-DNA insertion mutants and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) two-hybrid and coprecipitation assays, we report a signal transduction chain shared by blue light and abscisic acid leading to light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein expression in etiolated Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings. The chain consists of GCR1 (the sole Arabidopsis protein coding for a potential G-protein-coupled receptor), GPA1 (the sole Arabidopsis Galpha-subunit), Pirin1 (PRN1; one of four members of an iron-containing subgroup of the cupin superfamily), and a nuclear factor Y heterotrimer comprised of A5, B9, and possibly C9. We also demonstrate that this mechanism is present in imbibed seeds wherein it affects germination rate.     

Acetylation of pregnane X receptor protein determines selective function independent of ligand activation

Pregnane X receptor (PXR), like other members of its class of nuclear receptors, undergoes post-translational modification [PTM] (e.g., phosphorylation). However, it is unknown if acetylation (a major and common form of protein PTM) is observed on PXR and, if it is, whether it is of functional consequence. PXR has recently emerged as an important regulatory protein with multiple ligand-dependent functions. In the present work we show that PXR is indeed acetylated in vivo. SIRT1 (Sirtuin 1), a NAD-dependent class III histone deacetylase and a member of the sirtuin family of proteins, partially mediates deacetylation of PXR. Most importantly, the acetylation status of PXR regulates its selective function independent of ligand activation.     

Opposite Ends of the Spectrum: Plant and Animal G-Protein Signaling

Different classes of biotic (e.g., plant hormones) and abiotic (e.g., different wavelengths of light) signals act through specific signal transduction mechanisms to coordinate all aspects of plant development. Full signal transduction chains have not yet been described for most light or hormonal-mediated events despite the wide range of events early in development which are dependent upon hormonal and light signals. We recently reported a single signal transduction chain which can be initiated by both blue light (BL) and ABA, and which leads to the expression of specific members of the Lhcb gene family in the apical bud of etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings. The signal transduction chain consists of GCR1 (one of two Arabidopsis proteins coding for a potential G-protein coupled receptor), GPA1 (the sole Arabidopsis Ga subunit), PRN1 (Pirin1, one of four members of an iron-containing subgroup of the cupin superfamily), and a Nuclear Factor -Y (NF-Y) heterotrimer comprised of A5, B9 and possibly C9. The same signaling proteins control ABA-mediated delay of germination.Key Words: blue light, G-protein coupled receptor, G-protein sub unit, abscisic acid (ABA)     

9-cis-retinoic acid inhibits androgen receptor activity through activation of retinoid X receptor

Although the retinoic X receptor (RXR) forms heterodimers with many members of the estrogen receptor subfamily, the interaction between RXR and the members of the glucocorticoid receptor subfamily remains unclear. Here we show that the RXR can form a heterodimer with the androgen receptor (AR) under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Functional analyses further demonstrated that the AR, in the presence or absence of androgen, can function as a repressor to suppress RXR target genes, thereby preventing the RXR binding to the RXR DNA response element. In contrast, RXR can function as a repressor to suppress AR target genes in the presence of 9-cis-retinoic acid, but unliganded RXR can function as a weak coactivator to moderately enhance AR transactivation. Together, these results not only reveal a unique interaction between members of the two nuclear receptor subfamilies, but also represent the first evidence showing a nuclear receptor (RXR) may function as either a repressor or a coactivator based on the ligand binding status.     

Activation and targeting of mitogen-activated protein kinases by G-protein-coupled receptors

Over the past decade, it has become apparent that many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) generate signals that control cellular differentiation and growth, including stimulation of Ras family GTPases and activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways. The mechanisms that GPCRs use to control the activity of MAP kinases vary between receptor and cell type but fall broadly into one of three categories: signals initiated by classical G protein effectors, e.g., protein kinase (PK)A and PKC, signals initiated by cross-talk between GPCRs and classical receptor tyrosine kinases, e.g., "transactivation" of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, and signals initiated by direct interaction between beta-arrestins and components of the MAP kinase cascade, e.g., beta-arrestin "scaffolds". While each of these pathways results in increased cellular MAP kinase activity, emerging data suggest that they are not functionally redundant. MAP kinase activation occurring via PKC-dependent pathways and EGF receptor transactivation leads to nuclear translocation of the kinase and stimulates cell proliferation, while MAP kinase activation via beta-arrestin scaffolds primarily increases cytosolic kinase activity. By controlling the spatial and temporal distribution of MAP kinase activity within the cell, the consequences of GPCR-stimulated MAP kinase activation may be determined by the mechanism by which they are activated.     

Recent advances in the TR2 and TR4 orphan receptors of the nuclear receptor superfamily

The human testicular receptor 2 (TR2) and TR4 orphan receptors are two evolutionarily related proteins belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Numerous TR2 and TR4 variants and homologs have been identified from different species, including vertebrates (e.g. human, murine, rabbit, fish, and amphibian) and invertebrates (e.g. Drosophila, sea urchin, and nematode) since TR2 was initially isolated over a decade ago. Specific tissue distribution, genomic organization, and chromosomal assignment of both orphan receptors have been investigated. In order to reveal the physiological functions played by both TR2 and TR4, upstream modulators of TR2 and TR4 gene expression, their downstream target gene regulation, feedback mechanisms, and differential modulation mediated by the recruitment of other nuclear receptors and coregulators have been investigated. Studies summarized in the present report have provided unexpected insights into the TR2 and TR4 functions in a variety of biological processes. The essential and difficult tasks of identifying orphan receptor ligands, agonist/antagonist assignment, their physiological functions, and mechanisms of action will continue to challenge nuclear receptor researchers in the future.     

Regulatory roles and molecular signaling of TNF family members in osteoclasts

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family has been one of the most intensively studied families of proteins in the past two decades. The TNF family constitutes 19 members that mediate diverse biological functions in a variety of cellular systems. The TNF family members regulate cellular functions through binding to membrane-bound receptors belonging to the TNF receptor (TNFR) family. Members of the TNFR family lack intrinsic kinase activity and thus they initiate signaling by interacting intracellular signaling molecules such as TNFR associated factor (TRAF), TNFR associated death domain (TRADD) and Fas-associated death domain (FADD). In bone metabolism, it has been shown that numerous TNF family members including receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL), TNF-alpha, Fas ligand (FasL) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) play pivotal roles in the differentiation, function, survival and/or apoptosis of osteoclasts, the principal bone-resorbing cells. These TNF family members not only regulate physiological bone remodeling but they are also implicated in the pathogenesis of various bone diseases such as osteoporosis and bone loss in inflammatory conditions. This review will focus on our current understanding of the regulatory roles and molecular signaling of these TNF family members in osteoclasts.     

G proteins control diverse pathways of transmembrane signaling

Hormones, neurotransmitters, and autacoids interact with specific receptors and thereby trigger a series of molecular events that ultimately produce their biological effects. These receptors, localized in the plasma membrane, carry binding sites for ligands as diverse as peptides (e.g., glucagon, neuropeptides), lipids (e.g., prostaglandins), nucleosides and nucleotides (e.g., adenosine), and amines (e.g., catecholamines, serotonin). These receptors do not interest directly with their respective downstream effector (i.e., an ion channel and/or an enzyme that synthesizes a second messenger); rather, they control one or several target systems via the activation of an intermediary guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein or G protein. G proteins serve as signal transducers, linking extracellularly oriented receptors to membrane-bound effectors. Traffic in these pathways is regulated by a GTP (on)-GDP (off) switch, which is regulated by the receptor. The combination of classical biochemistry and recombinant DNA technology has resulted in the discovery of many members of the G protein family. These approaches, complemented in particular by electrophysiological experiments, have also identified several effectors that are regulated by G proteins. We can safely assume that current lists of G proteins and the functions that they control are incomplete.     

Effect of the antiprogestin RU-486 on progesterone inhibition of occupied nuclear estrogen receptor in the uterus

The ability of the antiprogestin, RU-486, to reverse progesterone (P) antagonism of occupied nuclear E receptor retention was studied in the rat and hamster uterus. RU-486 was shown to effectively displace [3H]P binding from rat uterine cytosolic P receptor in in vitro competition assay. In contrast, no competition by RU-486 for [3H]P binding was observed for uterine cytosolic P receptor from the hamster uterus. In the presence of sustained serum levels (silastic implants) of P and estradiol (E), occupied nuclear E receptor was significantly inhibited in the rat uterus. At 6, 12 and 24h after RU-486 treatment (5 mg/animal, s.c.) uterine receptors for E and P were determined. No significant differences in cytosolic E and P receptors were observed between treated (E + P, + RU-486) and control (E + P alone) animals. However, by 6 h following RU-486 treatment, occupied nuclear E receptor retention increased significantly (0.30 +/- 0.05 vs 0.60 +/- 0.09, pmol/uterus) and reached a peak between 12 h (1.32 +/- 0.09) and 24 h (0.83 +/- 0.09). The increase in nuclear E receptor approached the level observed in animals with an E implant alone (1.55 +/- 0.15). Measurement of uterine fluid accumulation following RU-486 treatment showed an increase which paralleled that observed for occupied nuclear E receptor retention. A similar in vivo experiment in the hamster showed no reversal of P inhibition of occupied nuclear E receptor. These results show that: 1. RU-486 is an effective competitor for rat uterine P receptor but not hamster P receptor; 2. RU-486 can rapidly reverse P inhibition of uterine occupied nuclear E receptor in the presence of sustained serum levels of E and P; 3. The recovery of occupied nuclear E receptor is coincident with a resumption of E action (uterine fluid accumulation). The studies also provide a novel means by which antiprogestin activity can be assessed in vivo in the presence of sustained E and P serum levels, e.g. the reversal of P inhibition of uterine nuclear E receptor retention.     

Nuclear receptors, mitochondria and lipid metabolism

Lipid metabolism is a continuum from emulsification and uptake of lipids in the intestine to cellular uptake and transport to compartments such as mitochondria. Whether fats are shuttled into lipid droplets in adipose tissue or oxidized in mitochondria and peroxisomes depends on metabolic substrate availability, energy balance and endocrine signaling of the organism. Several members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily are lipid-sensing factors that affect all aspects of lipid metabolism. The physiologic actions of glandular hormones (e.g. thyroid, mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid), vitamins (e.g. vitamins A and D) and reproductive hormones (e.g. progesterone, estrogen and testosterone) and their cognate receptors are well established. The peroxisome-proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) and liver X receptors (LXRs), acting in concert with PPARgamma Coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha), have been shown to regulate insulin sensitivity and lipid handling. These receptors are the focus of intense pharmacologic studies to expand the armamentarium of small molecule ligands to treat diabetes and the metabolic syndrome (hypertension, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and obesity). Recently, additional partners of PGC-1alpha have moved to the forefront of metabolic research, the estrogen-related receptors (ERRs). Although no endogenous ligands for these receptors have been identified, phenotypic analyses of knockout mouse models demonstrate an important role for these molecules in substrate sensing and handling as well as mitochondrial function.     

Identification of intracellular localization signals and of mechanisms underlining the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of human aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor

Two members of the ‘AhR family’ (a family which is part of the bHLH-PAS superfamily), aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and AhR repressor (AhRR), originated from a common ancestor and form a regulatory circuit in xenobiotic signal transduction. AhRR is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttle protein, harboring both a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a nuclear export signal (NES). Because NLS is dominant over NES, AhRR resides predominantly in the nuclear compartment. The NES of AhRR resembles that of AhR in sensitivity to leptomycin B, whereas the NLS of AhRR is monopartite and is, therefore, distinguished from the reported bipartite NLS of AhR. The NLS deletion mutant of GFP-AhRR was transported into the nuclear compartment in the presence of AhR nuclear translocator (Arnt), suggesting the assembly of an AhRR/Arnt heterodimer complex in the cytoplasmic compartment and Arnt-dependent nuclear translocation of this complex.     

Regulation of Nuclear Transport: Central Role in Development and Transformation?

Transport of macromolecules into and out of the nucleus is generally effected by targeting signals that are recognized by specific members of the importin/exportin transport receptor family. The latter mediate passage through the nuclear envelope-embedded nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) by conferring interaction with NPC constituents, as well as with other components of the nuclear transport machinery, including the guanine nucleotide-binding protein Ran. Importantly, nuclear transport is regulated at multiple levels via a diverse range of mechanisms, such as the modulation of the accessibility and affinity of target signal recognition by importins/exportins, with phosphorylation/dephosphorylation as a major mechanism. Alteration of the level of the expression of components of the nuclear transport machinery also appears to be a key determinant of transport efficiency, having central importance in development, differentiation and transformation.