Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple-areola complex of women with macromastia

Patients with macromastia often comment on a lack of sensation in their nipple-areola complex. A study was designed to investigate the cause of this decreased sensation. Two hypotheses were proposed. First, the decreased sensation could result from neuropraxia of the sensory nerve fibers secondary to traction caused by the heavy breast parenchyma. The second hypothesis proposed that tissue expansion of the nipple and areola by the voluminous breast parenchyma caused a decrease in nerve fibers per surface area and hence decreased sensory perception. Sixty-one patients were assessed in the study. All patients underwent surgery in which histological biopsy of either the areola alone (31 reduction mammaplasty patients) or the nipple and areola (30 mastectomy patients) was possible. Before surgery, each nipple-areola complex was tested with Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test monofilaments as a quantitative test of tactile sensation. Breast cup size, ptosis, and weight of tissue excised were recorded to allow general assessment of the breast size. The nipple and areola biopsy specimens were assessed using immunohistochemistry (S-100 polyclonal antibody, Dako Z311) to measure nerve fiber count per unit area. Statistical analysis was undertaken to find any association among sensitivity, breast cup size, ptosis, weight of tissue resected, and nerve fiber density in the nipple and areola biopsy specimens. Sensitivity at the areola decreased with increasing breast cup size (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) and ptosis (r = 0.42, p = 0.002 for increasing distance between inframammary crease and nipple; r = 0.49, p < 0.001 for increasing manubrium to nipple distance). There was a weak correlation between nerve fiber density at the areola and breast cup size (r = -0.22, p = 0.1). Sensitivity at the nipple was higher than at the areola. Nerve fiber density count at the nipple was higher than at the areola, but there was no statistically significant correlation between nipple sensitivity and breast cup size, ptosis, or weight of tissue resected. The results suggest that the areola and nipple are different in their neuroanatomy. The areola is a thin, pliable structure that is predisposed to stretch as the breast enlarges and therefore experience a decrease in nerve fiber density. The nipple is a compact structure that is less likely to stretch with breast enlargement. In the nipple, neither sensory perception nor nerve fiber density varied with size or breast ptosis. The perceived lack of sensation in the nipple-areola complex is multifactorial. This study shows that neither traction injury to the sensory nerves nor decreased nerve density alone can explain the subjective numbness reported by patients with macromastia. Psychological factors, such as dissatisfaction with body form or interpretation of lack of sensation in the areola as also affecting the nipple, may influence the patient's assessment of the nipple-areola sensitivity.     

Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques

Nipple-areola reconstruction represents the final stage of breast reconstruction, whereby a reconstructed breast mound is transformed into a breast facsimile that more closely resembles the original breast. Although numerous nipple reconstruction techniques are available, all have been plagued by eventual loss of long-term projection. In this report, the authors present a comparative assessment of nipple and areola projection after reconstruction using either a bell flap, a modified star flap, or a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft for areola reconstruction. The specific technique for nipple-areola reconstruction following breast reconstruction was selected on the basis of the projection of the contralateral nipple and whether or not the opposite areola showed projection. Patients with 5 mm or less of opposite nipple projection were treated with either the bell flap or the modified star flap. In patients where the areola complex exhibited significant projection, a bell flap was chosen over the modified star flap. In those patients with greater than 5-mm nipple projection, reconstruction with a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft was performed. Maintenance of nipple projection in each of these groups was then carefully assessed over a 1-year period of follow-up using caliper measurements of nipple and areola projection obtained at 3-month intervals. The best long-term nipple projection was obtained and maintained by the skate and star techniques. The major decrease in projection of the reconstructed nipple occurred during the first 3 months. After 6 months, the projection was stable. The loss of both nipple and areola projection when using the bell flap was so remarkable that the authors would discourage the use of this procedure in virtually all patients.     

Method to produce better areolae and nipples on reconstructed breasts.

A method to reconstruct the breast, nipple, and areola after mastectomy is described. The importance of symmetry is emphasized. A split-skin graft is used to reconstruct both (not one) areolae; this provides almost complete symmetry in terms of size, texture, and color. Ultraviolet light is used postoperatively to hyperpigment the skin-graft areolae, and the long-term appearance has been excellent. The method is quite simple, technically.     

我国沿海线形亚属海链藻的形态学研究

壳面孔纹的形态学特征是海链藻的重要分类学依据之一。线形亚属的海链藻种类大多是从圆筛藻属修订而来, 它们之间的区别特征细微, 需电镜下观察才能准确鉴定。我国关于线形亚属海链藻的报道较少。研究利用电镜(EM)技术, 对采自我国沿海海域的自然水样, 以及分离获得的单克隆培养藻株进行了形态学观察, 针对其中的海链藻属Thalassiosira Cleve种类开展了形态分类学的专题研究。报道了6个隶属于线形亚属的海链藻种类, 分别是紧密海链藻T. densannula Hasle &; Fryxell、微小海链藻T. exigua Fryxell &; Hasle、线形海链藻T. lineata Jousé、微线形海链藻T. nanolineata (Mann) Fryxell &; Hasle、结线形海链藻T. nodulolineata (Hendey) Hasle &; Fryxell和柔弱海链藻T. tenera Proschkina-Lavrenko, 其中有4个为我国新记录种类: 紧密海链藻、线形海链藻、微线形海链藻和结线形海链藻。对每个种类的形态学特征、生活习性和生态分布进行了描述, 提供了电镜照片。对相似种类的形态学特征进行了比较研究, 分析了孔纹特征的变化类型及其分类学意义。     

Surgical correction of the inverted nipple with a tendon graft: hammock procedure

Our procedure, in which the inverted nipple was suspended using autogenous tendon grafts, was easy to perform, and it was not necessary to cut the lactiferous ducts. There was no deformity of the nipple or areola after this procedure, and the surgical scars were inconspicuous. Three patients who were followed up for over 1 year after surgery were presented in this paper. In eight patients (13 corrected inverted nipples), good results were obtained and there have been no complications to date.     

The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study

Although preservation of the sensitivity of the nipple and areola is an important goal in breast surgery, only scant and contradictory information about the course and distribution of the supplying nerves is found in the literature. The existing controversy might be due to the difficulty in dissecting the thin nerves and to frequent anatomic variations that bias the results if only a small number of cadavers are dissected. We dissected 28 female cadavers and found that the nipple and areola were always innervated by the lateral and anterior cutaneous branches of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th intercostal nerves. The most constant innervation pattern was by the 4th lateral cutaneous branch (79 percent) and by the 3rd and 4th anterior cutaneous branches (57 percent). The anterior cutaneous branches took a superficial course within the subcutaneous tissue and terminated at the medial areolar border in all dissected breasts. The lateral cutaneous branches took a deep course within the pectoral fascia and reached the nipple from its posterior surface in 93 percent of the dissected breasts. In 7 percent of the dissected breasts, the lateral cutaneous branches took a superficial course within the subcutaneous fat and reached the nipple from the lateral side. These findings suggest that the nerves innervating the nipple and areola are best protected if resections at the base of the breast and skin incisions at the medial areolar border are avoided.     

A new technique for reconstructing Montgomery's tubercles

Although Montgomery's tubercles are often prominent structures on the areola, little attention has been paid to their reconstruction. Present techniques for nipple-areola reconstruction result in a flat-appearing surface that is usually not characteristic of a normal areola with its projecting Montgomery's tubercles. We describe a technique for creating Montgomery's tubercles that has resulted in a more normal-appearing nipple-areola complex and a higher degree of patient satisfaction.     

Cryopreserved autologous nipple-areola complex transfer to the reconstructed breast

If a patient's nipple-areola complex is available for grafting after mastectomy, it is the best material to use for nipple-areola reconstruction. The authors performed delayed autologous nipple-areola complex transfer to reconstructed breasts in 10 patients (mean age, 47 years; range, 40 to 53 years). The nipple-areola complex was cryopreserved with a programmed freezer after mastectomy. Histological examination of the tissue surrounding the nipple and areola eliminated the possibility of cancer invasion. At the time of transfer, the cryopreserved nipple-areola complex was thawed in 37 degrees C water and grafted on a projection made by a denuded dermal flap on the reconstructed breast. Each patient underwent immediate breast reconstruction using an innervated pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. The patients' postoperative courses were uneventful. The timing of transfer ranged from 3 months to 1 year (mean, 5.8 months) after breast reconstruction. Nipple projection was made by the "four" dermal flap in five cases, a round dermal flap in three cases, a double dermal flap in one case, and a denuded skate flap in one case. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 36 months (mean, 21.8 months). All grafts were adapted. The final evaluation of nipple-areola complex adaptation was good in four cases, fair in four cases, and poor in two cases. Histological examination of the hematoxylin and eosin stains showed no remarkable destruction of the skin of the nipple and areola, and electron microscopic examination of the areola skin revealed no significant change. However, electron microscopic examination of the nipple skin showed serious damage to skin components, including elongation of the desmosome, widening of the intercellular space at the prickle cell and basal layers, and shrinking of prickle and basal cells. Although further development of the freezing process and cryopreservation technique is needed to prevent depigmentation of the nipple and areola, cryopreserved nipple-areola complex transfer to a reconstructed breast could be an alternative method of nipple-areola reconstruction.     

Reconstruction of the breast areola by intradermal tattooing and transfer. Case report.

A method of reconstructing a missing areola with a pre-tattooed full-thickness skin graft from the contralateral breast is presented.     

Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty

Breast sensation after reduction mammaplasty is a major concern for surgeons and patients. The sensitivity of 80 breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique (a superior dermoglandular pedicle with resection at the lower quadrants) was assessed in a prospective study. Ten points were selected on each breast for this study, including the nipple, four points on the areola, and five points on the breast skin. The measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pressure thresholds were measured with 20 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, temperature sensitivity with hot and cold metal probes, vibratory thresholds with the Biotesiometer, and static and moving two-point discrimination tests with a Disk-Criminator. To assess the influence of breast ptosis and hypertrophy on sensitivity, the population was divided into two groups. In group I (19 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was less than 29 cm, and less than 500 g of tissue per breast was removed. In group II (21 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was more than 29 cm, and more than 500 g of tissue was resected. The sensitivity on the nipple and areola was significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for all modalities. At 1 year, sensitivity recovered, and no breast or nipple-areola complex was insensitive. Pressure sensitivity was not significantly different from the preoperative measurement in any area of the breast or in either group of patients, except for superior breast skin, for which sensitivity was improved in group II (p = 0.0004). Temperature sensitivity in group I was not different preoperatively and postoperatively, but in group II, a significant decrease was observed in sensitivity for the nipple and areola (p = 0.01 and 0.004, respectively). Vibratory sensitivity was significantly decreased on the nipple, the areola, and the inferior breast skin (p = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) in group II but not in group I.In conclusion, ptotic or moderately hypertrophied breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique recovered their preoperative level of sensitivity after an initial postoperative decline. However, in large breasts, although pressure sensitivity recovered after 1 year, temperature and vibration sensitivity remained diminished on the nipple-areola complex.     

Aesthetic subunits of the breast

Surgery for breast cancer has traditionally addressed the breast as if it were a geometric circle with associated quadrants. Cosmetic reconstruction should not follow geometric patterns but should emphasize perceived contour and normal clothing lines. Similar to nasal reconstruction, a subunit principle in breast reconstruction planning may significantly improve the appearance of the result. To better identify the most aesthetic subunits for breast reconstruction, 10 years of autogenous reconstruction in 264 patients was reviewed. Various patterns of breast subunits were identified. The more favorable subunits of the breast in terms of postoperative appearance and camouflage of scars included the nipple, areola, and expanded areola subunits. For larger skin defects, the best subunits were the inferolateral, lower half, and a total breast subunits. Dividing the breast into reconstructive subunits that are to be replaced as a whole rather than as a patch gives superior results. Photographed examples of aesthetic subunits illustrate the placement of scars along natural lines that maximize the advantages of camouflage afforded by clothing.     

Guidelines in concentric mastopexy

The scope and technique of concentric mastopexy remain unclear and controversial. In our hands, the procedure has application for mild nipple ptosis, glandular ptosis, and areola asymmetry, as well as the tuberous breast. Early disappointment has changed to increasing satisfaction as we have gained confidence in predicting our results based on the identification of three simple principles of concentric mastopexy. The first and most important, which states Doutside less than or equal to Doriginal + (Doriginal - Dinside), requires that the outer concentric circle must be drawn not to exceed the original areola diameter by more than the original areola diameter exceeds the inner concentric circle diameter. The second principle, Doutside less than or equal to 2 X Dinside, recommends that the outer circle diameter be drawn not to exceed twice that of the inner circle, to prevent poor scarring or over flattening of the breast. The third principle, Dfinal = 1/2(Doutside + Dinside), allows prediction of the final areola size as the average of the diameters of the inner and outer concentric circles. These three principles allow excision of a maximum amount of areola and periareola skin without the side effect of poor scars, dilated areola, or misshapened breasts. Applying these three principles to concentric mastopexy with or without augmentation mammaplasty, one may confidently correct a wide variety of deformities, producing more symmetrical, attractive breasts with areolae of a predictable size.     

The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles

As humans are mammals, it is possible, perhaps even probable, that we have pheromones. However, there is no robust bioassay-led evidence for the widely published claims that four steroid molecules are human pheromones: androstenone, androstenol, androstadienone and estratetraenol. In the absence of sound reasons to test the molecules, positive results in studies need to be treated with scepticism as these are highly likely to be false positives. Common problems include small sample sizes, an overestimate of effect size (as no effect can be expected), positive publication bias and lack of replication. Instead, if we are to find human pheromones, we need to treat ourselves as if we were a newly discovered mammal, and use the rigorous methods already proven successful in pheromone research on other species. Establishing a pheromone relies on demonstration of an odour-mediated behavioural or physiological response, identification and synthesis of the bioactive molecule(s), followed by bioassay confirmation of activity. Likely sources include our sebaceous glands. Comparison of secretions from adult and pre-pubertal humans may highlight potential molecules involved in sexual behaviour. One of the most promising human pheromone leads is a nipple secretion from the areola glands produced by all lactating mothers, which stimulates suckling by any baby not just their own.     

Prevention of the teardrop areola following the inferior pedicle technique of breast reduction

Elevation of the inferior portion of the areola with placement of dermal traction sutures will reduce the risk of an inverted teardrop areola deformity following inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. The long-term results in creation of a circular areola have been uniformly successful.     

Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the alterations of symptoms and tactile sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. In a prospective study, 10 women were operated on using the inferior pedicle technique. The patients were examined and interviewed preoperatively and at 2 weeks and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Tactile sensibility was assessed by Somedic monofilaments applied on nine points on each breast: the nipple, four points on the areola, and in four quadrants of the skin. Preoperative tactile sensibility was compared with tactile sensibility in 10 normal controls. A median of 744 g of tissue was removed. All patients reported relief of shoulder and neck discomfort and improvement of skin sensibility 1 year after the operation. Two weeks after the operation, the sensibility of the areola was reduced (p < 0.05), but the skin sensibility of two quadrants was improved (p < 0.05). The sensibility of the areola was restored to preoperative values during the observation period. At 12 months, sensibility was improved compared with preoperative values both in the upper part of the areola and in three quadrants of the skin (p < 0.05). Significant improvement of skin sensibility was found between 3 and 12 months postoperatively in two quadrants of the breast. Also, the erectile function of the nipple was not altered by the operation. In conclusion, the sensibility of the breast was improved or unchanged 1 year after reduction mammaplasty using the Robbins technique. Continuous improvement of sensibility was found during the 1-year observation period. The evidence provided by this prospective study rules out the common misconception that a reduction mammaplasty gives the patient reduced areola sensibility and altered erectile function.     

Sensitive areolar reconstruction in using a neurocutaneous island flap based on the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve.

Sensory reconstruction has recently been stressed in breast reconstruction. However, there are no reports concerning the reconstruction of a sensitive areola. The bilateral reconstruction of a sensitive areola using a neurocutaneous flap based on the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve is reported. The flap was harvested from the distal third of the forearm as an island flap and tunneled to reach the apex of the new breast, which was previously reconstructed using a 135-cc, gel-filled, silicone prosthesis covered by a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Six months later, fine sensibility in the reconstructed areola was demonstrated. The patient could perceive light touch, pain, and 14 mm two-point discrimination. At 2 months after surgery, 50 percent of cutaneous faulty stimulus location was observed. However, at 4 and 6 months after surgery, faulty location disappeared. Six months after harvesting the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, the sensory deficit was minimal; it included a hypoesthesic zone of 4 to 7 cm and an anesthesic zone of 2.5 to 5 cm on the middle third of the forearm. Fifteen months after the procedure, no hypoesthesic zone was observed; only a 2 to 3 cm anesthesic zone on the proximal medial side of the forearm existed. This sensory deficit passed unnoticed by the patient. The technique developed here is a refinement in breast reconstruction, and we think it should be used in selected patients.     

The sit-up position for breast reconstruction

For breast reconstruction, we have found that breast symmetry can be created optimally when the patient is brought to a totally upright position with the trunk vertical and perpendicular to the floor. The size of the opposite breast can better be appreciated. Nipple and areola position can be determined accurately even with the patient asleep if she is brought to the upright position. The safety of the upright positioning is documented in our series but depends on planning with the anesthesiologist preoperatively and allowing time to move the patient cautiously. An anesthesia technique for intraoperative vertical positioning is reported.     

A revision of the genus Microula (Boraginaceae)

1. Having analyzed the external morphology of the genus Microula, the author has proposed a series of criteria as bases for the construction of a classification scheme of this genus. The most important ones are as follows: 1) The normally developed stem is primitive, and the strongly abbreviated stem more advanced. 2) The small inconspicuous bracts are more primitive than the large suborbicular densely arranged ones, which almost entirely cover the flowers and the fruits. 3) Nutlets with small dorsal pit are more primitive than those with larger pit on one hand or those without it on the other. 4) The dorsal pit with simple margin precedes that with double margins. 5) Nutlets with subbasal areola precede those with lateral or apical areola. 6) Nutlets without glochids precede those with glochids. 2. Basing upon these criteria the genus Microula may be divided into six sections. The section Schistocaryum may be the primitive one, and the others may be evolved from it respectively. The possible affinities between them are demonstrated in figure no. two. 3. The genus Microula, containing 30 species, is mainly distributed in the Chinghai-Tibetan plateau and the majority of its species concentrates in the eastern border of the plateau, and of the 30 species 26—that is 90 percent—are endemic to China, and the remaining 4 are distributed elsewhere in China, too, and extending southward and westward to Bhutan, Sikkim, Nepal and Kashmir respectively. In the region between Heishui, Province Szechuan, and Chinghai Lake there are 9 species, which, curiously, represent all the six sections of Microula, hence this region seems to be the center of maximum variation of this genus. M. ovalifolia whose nutlets have small dorsal pit and subbasal areola may be considered the most primitive species. Thus the author is of the opinion that the western part of province Szechuan, to which M. ovalifolia is endemic, may probably be the center of origin of the genusMicroula.     

A Z-mammaplasty with minimal scarring

An improved technique for reduction mammaplasty is described that has the advantage of giving a satisfactory final shape to the breast while producing a minimal scar. The method involves periareolar deepithelialization with displacement of the nipple-areola complex, partial subcutaneous mastectomy at the base of the mammary cone, and a Z-plasty to interlock two triangles of skin left after the removal of a little excess skin in the region above the inframammary fold. The Z-plasty adds skin vertically to the inferior pole, resulting in a better final shape and reducing tension around the areola. Any further excess skin is left to retract spontaneously. The best indications for this operation are in young women with elastic skin free of striae "gravidarum." Our experience now covers 53 patients aged 14 to 30 years with reductions of up to 900 gm per breast, and we have encountered no major complications over a 3-year follow-up period.     

Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in blacks

Black women have not embraced cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast with the same enthusiasm as their Caucasian counterparts because of fear of hypertrophic scars. The authors offer suggestions on how to minimize the scarring associated with breast surgery in black women. They feel that intraareolar incisions should be used whenever circumareolar incisions are indicated in augmentation mammaplasty, because the areola, being a favored area, is less likely to produce hypertrophic scars. The Marchac technique of reduction mammaplasty is recommended because it produces a short horizontal scar of 5 to 8 cm confined to the breast without medial and lateral extension, which may hypertrophy in black women. In the reduction of large breasts, secondary excision of dogears 6 or more weeks after mammaplasty reduces the medial and lateral extents of the scar. The use of liposuction as an adjunct to reduction mammaplasty may also accomplish the same thing. Amputation and free nipple-areola grafting should be used with caution in black patients because of the tendency of the grafted areola to hypopigment. In postmastectomy reconstruction, the authors suggest that the techniques described by Ryan and Radovan should be considered first before the techniques of reconstruction utilizing myocutaneous flaps. In these procedures, no new scars which may hypertrophy are created away from the site of reconstruction. Staples should not be used in skin closure in blacks because they cause cross-hatching of the wound even when removed early.