Fragile Site Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Causes Loss of Heterozygosity by Mitotic Crossovers and Break-Induced Replication

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at tumor suppressor loci is a major contributor to cancer initiation and progression. Both deletions and mitotic recombination can lead to LOH. Certain chromosomal loci known as common fragile sites are susceptible to DNA lesions under replication stress, and replication stress is prevalent in early stage tumor cells. There is extensive evidence for deletions stimulated by common fragile sites in tumors, but the role of fragile sites in stimulating mitotic recombination that causes LOH is unknown. Here, we have used the yeast model system to study the relationship between fragile site instability and mitotic recombination that results in LOH. A naturally occurring fragile site, FS2, exists on the right arm of yeast chromosome III, and we have analyzed LOH on this chromosome. We report that the frequency of spontaneous mitotic BIR events resulting in LOH on the right arm of yeast chromosome III is higher than expected, and that replication stress by low levels of polymerase alpha increases mitotic recombination 12-fold. Using single-nucleotide polymorphisms between the two chromosome III homologs, we mapped the locations of recombination events and determined that FS2 is a strong hotspot for both mitotic reciprocal crossovers and break-induced replication events under conditions of replication stress.     

Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements

Common fragile sites are large chromosomal regions that preferentially exhibit gaps or breaks after DNA synthesis is partially perturbed. Fragile site instability in cultured cells is well documented and includes gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes, translocation and deletions breakpoints, and sister chromosome exchanges. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic structure at fragile sites and the cellular mechanisms that monitor their stability. The study of fragile sites has merged with that of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, with multiple proteins from these pathways implicated in fragile site stability, including ATR, BRCA1, CHK1, and RAD51. Since their discovery, fragile sites have been implicated in constitutional and cancer chromosome rearrangements in vivo and recent studies suggest that common fragile sites may serve as markers of chromosome damage caused by replication stress during early tumorigenesis. Here we review the relationship of fragile sites to chromosome rearrangements, particularly in tumor cells, and discuss the mechanisms that may be involved.     

Inhibition of topoisomerase I prevents chromosome breakage at common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are loci that preferentially form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes when DNA synthesis is perturbed, particularly after treatment with the DNA polymerase inhibitor, aphidicolin. We and others have identified several cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair proteins that influence common fragile site stability. However, the initial events underlying fragile site breakage remain poorly understood. We demonstrate here that aphidicolin-induced gaps and breaks at fragile sites are prevented when cells are co-treated with low concentrations of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin. This reduction in breakage is accompanied by a reduction in aphidicolin-induced RPA foci, CHK1 and RPA2 phosphorylation, and PCNA monoubiquitination, indicative of reduced levels of single stranded DNA. Furthermore, camptothecin reduces spontaneous fragile site breakage seen in cells lacking ATR, even in the absence of aphidicolin. These data from cultured human cells demonstrate that topoisomerase I activity is required for DNA common fragile site breaks and suggest that polymerase–helicase uncoupling is a key initial event in this process.     

The characterization of the common fragile site FRA16D and its involvement in multiple myeloma translocations

Fragile sites appear as breaks, gaps, or decondensations on metaphase chromosomes when cells are grown under specific culture conditions. The breaks are nonrandom, appearing in defined, conserved locations throughout the mammalian genome. Common fragile sites, as their name implies, are present in virtually all individuals. With three common fragile sites cloned, their mechanism of expression and the role, if any, they play in human disease are still unclear. We have assembled a BAC contig of >1 Mb across the second most active common fragile site, FRA16D (16q23.2). We fluorescently labeled these BACs and used them as probes on metaphases from aphidicolin-induced lymphocytes and demonstrated that FRA16D decondensation/breakage occurs over a region of at least 1 Mb. Thus, this is the largest common fragile site cloned to date. Microsatellite markers that map within FRA16D show a very high loss in prostate, breast, and ovarian tumors, indicating that loss within this fragile site may be important in the development or progression of these tumors. In addition, a common t(14q32;16q23) translocation is observed in up to 25% of all multiple myelomas (MM). We localized four of four such cloned t(14;16) MM breakpoints within the FRA16D region. This work further demonstrates that the common fragile sites may play an important role in cancer development.     

ATR regulates fragile site stability

Conditions that partially inhibit DNA replication induce expression of common fragile sites. These sites form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes and are deleted and rearranged in many tumors. Yet, the mechanism of fragile site expression has been elusive. We demonstrate that the replication checkpoint kinase ATR, but not ATM, is critical for maintenance of fragile site stability. ATR deficiency results in fragile site expression with and without addition of replication inhibitors. Thus, we propose that fragile sites are unreplicated chromosomal regions resulting from stalled forks that escape the ATR replication checkpoint. These findings have important implications for understanding both the mechanism of fragile site instability and the consequences of stalled replication in mammalian cells.     

Characterization of the human common fragile site FRA2G

Common fragile sites are nonrandom loci that show gaps and breaks when cells are exposed to specific compounds. They are preferentially involved in recombination, chromosomal rearrangements, and foreign DNA integration. These sites have been suggested to play a role in chromosome instability observed in cancer. In this work we used a FISH-based approach to identify a BAC contig that spans the FRA2G fragile site located at the 2q31 region. Our observations indicate that a very fragile region spanning at least 450 kb is present within a large fragile region that extends over 1 Mb. At least seven genes are mapped in the fragile region. One of these seems to be a good candidate as a potential tumor suppressor gene impaired by the recurrent deletions observed at the 2q31 region in some neoplasms. In the fragile region, a considerable number of regions of high flexibility that may be related to the fragility are present.     

Role of deoxyridine incorporation and DNA repair in the expression of human chromosomal fragile sites

This paper is a discussion of the possible roles of deoxyuridine incorporation into DNA and DNA-repair processes in the expression of the folate-sensitive, common chromosomal fragile sites. Expression of aberrations at these sites increases under conditions expected to increase deoxyuridine incorporation into the chromosome. It is likely that this abnormal base is removed by an excision-repair process that results in transient chromosome breaks; these breaks are seen as chromosome aberrations if repair is not completed before metaphase. Analogous events may account for other types of chromosome aberrations including the so-called “spontaneous” aberrations, the rare folate-sensitive fragile sites, and fragile sites induced by other means.     

Factors that influence bidirectional long-tract homozygosis due to double-strand break repair in Candida albicans

Genomic rearrangements have been associated with the acquisition of adaptive phenotypes, allowing organisms to efficiently generate new favorable genetic combinations. The diploid genome of Candida albicans is highly plastic, displaying numerous genomic rearrangements that are often the by-product of the repair of DNA breaks. For example, DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair using homologous-recombination pathways are a major source of loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH), observed ubiquitously in both clinical and laboratory strains of C. albicans. Mechanisms such as break-induced replication (BIR) or mitotic crossover (MCO) can result in long tracts of LOH, spanning hundreds of kilobases until the telomere. Analysis of I-SceI-induced BIR/MCO tracts in C. albicans revealed that the homozygosis tracts can ascend several kilobases toward the centromere, displaying homozygosis from the break site toward the centromere. We sought to investigate the molecular mechanisms that could contribute to this phenotype by characterizing a series of C. albicans DNA repair mutants, including pol32^-/-, msh2^-/-, mph1^-/-, and mus81^-/-. The impact of deleting these genes on genome stability revealed functional differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a model DNA repair organism) and C. albicans. In addition, we demonstrated that ascending LOH tracts toward the centromere are associated with intrinsic features of BIR and potentially involve the mismatch repair pathway which acts upon natural heterozygous positions. Overall, this mechanistic approach to study LOH deepens our limited characterization of DNA repair pathways in C. albicans and brings forth the notion that centromere proximal alleles from DNA break sites are not guarded from undergoing LOH.     

Non random distribution of lesions induced by deoxyribonuclease I in human chromosomes

We studied the action of deoxyribonuclease I on human lymphocytes in order to determine the localization of the DNAase induced aberrations. Our results indicate a non-random distribution of the lesions on chromosome regions which may reflect a differential pattern of sensitivity to the enzyme. Furthermore we observed a correspondence between the preferential DNAase induced breaks and fragile sites that are expressed in lymphocytes maintained in medium without folic acid. A possible interpretation of our findings is that the accessibility to DNAase and/or the efficiency of the repair systems depend on the chromatin structure that influences also the expression of some common fragile sites.Abbreviations DNAase I deoxyribonuclease I E.C.3.1.4.5.     

DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer

Human chromosomal fragile sites are specific genomic regions which exhibit gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes following conditions of partial replication stress. Fragile sites often coincide with genes that are frequently rearranged or deleted in human cancers, with over half of cancer-specific translocations containing breakpoints within fragile sites. But until recently, little direct evidence existed linking fragile site breakage to the formation of cancer-causing chromosomal aberrations. Studies have revealed that DNA breakage at fragile sites can induce formation of RET/PTC rearrangements, and deletions within the FHIT gene, resembling those observed in human tumors. These findings demonstrate the important role of fragile sites in cancer development, suggesting that a better understanding of the molecular basis of fragile site instability is crucial to insights in carcinogenesis. It is hypothesized that under conditions of replication stress, stable secondary structures form at fragile sites and stall replication fork progress, ultimately resulting in DNA breaks. A recent study examining an FRA16B fragment confirmed the formation of secondary structure and DNA polymerase stalling within this sequence in vitro, as well as reduced replication efficiency and increased instability in human cells. Polymerase stalling during synthesis of FRA16D has also been demonstrated. The ATR DNA damage checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in maintaining stability at fragile sites. Recent findings have confirmed binding of the ATR protein to three regions of FRA3B under conditions of mild replication stress. This review will discuss recent advances made in understanding the role and mechanism of fragile sites in cancer development.     

DAPI-inducible common fragile sites

DAPI, a compound specific for the AT bases of DNA, causes gaps and breaks in three human chromosome sites, at the 1q41-1q42 interface, 2q31, and 7p22. It also induces undercondensation of a chromosome site at the 13q21-13q22 interface. The first three sites have the characteristics of "common fragile sites" and are present as gaps and breaks on the chromosomes of seven individuals.     

N-methylpurines are heterogeneously repaired in human mitochondria but not evidently repaired in yeast mitochondria

Base excision repair (BER) of dimethyl sulfate induced N-methylpurines (NMPs) was measured at nucleotide resolution in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of cultured human and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. NMPs were repaired with heterogeneous rates in the human mtDNA. The nearest-neighbor nucleotides significantly affected the repair rates: NMPs between pyrimidines were repaired much faster than those between purines, and those between a purine and a pyrimidine were repaired at intermediate rates. Repair intermediates of NMPs can also be detected at certain sites of the human mtDNA, indicating an ineffectiveness of processing the intermediates at these sites by the human mitochondrial BER machinery. In contrast to the human mtDNA, the yeast mtDNA did not show detectable repair of NMPs at any sites. Furthermore, a high level of spontaneous strand breaks exists exclusively at purine sites in the yeast mtDNA. Spontaneous NMPs or oxidative lesions were unlikely to be the major causes for the spontaneous strand breaks. Rather, spontaneous depurination combined with inefficient processing of DNA nicks or single-nucleotide gaps by the yeast mitochondrial BER machinery may result in the spontaneous strand breaks. Our results unveil a striking difference in BER between human and the yeast mitochondria.     

A mouse model of the fragile gene FHIT: From carcinogenesis to gene therapy and cancer prevention

Mouse models of tumor suppressors are increasingly useful to investigate biomedical aspects of cancer genetics. Some tumor suppressor genes are located at common fragile sites that are specific chromosomal regions highly susceptible to DNA lesions. The tumor suppressor gene FHIT, at the fragile site FRA3B, is the first fragile gene with a developed and characterized mouse knockout model. The human gene FHIT is frequently deleted in cancers and cancer cell lines of many epithelial tissues, and Fhit protein is absent or reduced in most cancers. The mouse Fhit ortholog is also located at a common fragile site, Fra14A2 on murine chromosome 14, and sustains homozygous deletions in murine cancer cell lines. The Fhit knockout mouse is, therefore, an adequate model to study human FHIT function. To establish an animal model and to explore the role of FHIT in tumorigenesis, we have developed a mouse strain carrying one or two inactivated Fhit alleles. Insights into Fhit mouse genetics that have emerged in the last 7 years, and are reviewed in the present article, allowed for development of new tools in carcinogenesis and gene delivery studies.     

Replication delay along FRA7H, a common fragile site on human chromosome 7, leads to chromosomal instability

Common fragile sites are specific chromosomal loci that show gaps, breaks, or rearrangements in metaphase chromosomes under conditions that interfere with DNA replication. The mechanism underlying the chromosomal instability at fragile sites was hypothesized to associate with late replication time. Here, we aimed to investigate the replication pattern of the common fragile site FRA7H, encompassing 160 kb on the long arm of human chromosome 7. Using in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei, we revealed that the replication of this region is initiated relatively early, before 30% of S phase is completed. However, a high fraction ( approximately 35%) of S-phase nuclei showed allelic asynchrony, indicating that the replication of FRA7H is accomplished at different times in S phase. This allelic asynchrony is not the result of a specific replication time of each FRA7H allele. Analysis of the replication pattern of adjacent clones along FRA7H by using cell population and two-color fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses showed significant differences in the replication of adjacent clones, under normal growth condition and upon aphidicolin treatment. This pattern significantly differed from that of two nonfragile regions which showed a coordinated replication under both conditions. These results indicate that aphidicolin is enhancing an already existing difference in the replication time along the FRA7H region. Based on our replication analysis of FRA7H and on previous analysis of the common fragile site FRA3B, we suggest that delayed replication is underlying the fragility at aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites.     

Common fragile sites

Aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites are site-specific gaps or breaks seen on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. These fragile sites were first recognized during the early studies of the fragile X syndrome and are induced by the same conditions of folate or thymidylate stress used to induce the fragile X site. Common fragile sites are normally stable in cultured human cells. However, following induction with replication inhibitors, they display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA. From the many studies that have cloned and characterized fragile sites, it is now known that these sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit late or delayed replication, and contain regions of high flexibility but are otherwise unremarkable in sequence. Studies showing that fragile sites and their associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in tumorigenesis. Yet until recently, very little was known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their stability. Recent findings showing that the key checkpoint genes ATR and BRCA1 are critical for genome stability at fragile sites have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the biological significance of common fragile sites.     

Fragile and unstable chromosomes in cancer: causes and consequences

Cancer cells commonly exhibit various forms of genetic instability, such as changes in chromosome copy number, translocations and point mutations in particular genes. Although transmissible change seems to be an essential part of the neoplastic process, the extent to which DNA instability is a cause rather than a consequence of cancer is unclear. Chromosomal fragile sites have been proposed to be not only susceptible to DNA instability in cancer cells, but also associated with genes that contribute to the neoplastic process. Mutation at fragile site loci might therefore have a causative role in cancer. Recent studies on one class of human chromosomal fragile sites show that instability at fragile site loci can functionally contribute to tumor cell biology.     

Rodent common fragile sites: Are they conserved? Evidence from mouse and rat

Nineteen fragile sites induced by aphidicolin in lymphocyte cultures from the laboratory mouse are documented. These sites are compared with previously described fragile sites induced in mouse fibroblast systems, and then with those reported on chromosomes which have been evolutionarily conserved between the mouse and the laboratory rat. Of a total of 38 fragile sites thus far identified in mouse fibroblasts and lymphocytes, only 4 sites are common to the two cell types; 34 sites show no correspondence of loci. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, but it is possible that these data may indicate some degree of tissue specificity of fragile site expression in the mouse. Eight autosomes in the mouse and rat retain straightforward and nearly complete banding homology. To test the hypothesis that fragile sites are conserved between the two species, we compared these eight autosomes with regard to number and distribution of fragile site loci. A total of 30 fragile sites is distributed over the conserved chromosomes. Only 4 (possibly 5) are common to both species; 18 are found in the rat but not the mouse, and 4 are found in the mouse but not the rat. Of the 4 shared sites, notable differences in frequency of expression exist. Our comparisons show that: (1) a small numer of fragile sites is conserved; (2) a large number of fragile sites is not conserved, and (3) some sites which are conserved are quite different in the frequency at which they are expressed in the two species, indicating that the sites themselves may have undergone evolutionary change. The chromosomes compared between mouse and rat are widely conserved among murid rodents and thereby offer further opportunities to investigate fragile site phenomena in diverse species.     

Synergistic effect of aphidicolin and ethanol on the induction of common fragile sites

Summary The effect of ethanol on the frequency of aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites was studied using lymphocyte cultures from two normal women. Aphidicolin was added to the cultures at a final concentration of 0.2 M and ethanol at 0.02%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 1%, both during the last 26 h of culture. The frequency of common fragile sites increased from 296% in subject 1 and 201% in subject 2 with aphidicolin plus 0.02% ethanol, to 765% and 823%, respectively, with aphidicolin plus 1% ethanol. Ethanol alone added to cultures did not induce common fragile sites. The gaps and breaks induced by aphidicolin plus ethanol were highly nonrandom. Altogether, 35 common fragile sites were identified. The addition of 1% ethanol to aphidicolin increased both random and nonrandom gaps and breaks as compared with that of 0.02% ethanol. Dimethyl sulfoxide added to culture at final concentrations of 0.02% to 1% did not change the frequency of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites. The frequency of fluorodeoxyuridine-induced fragile sites was not affected by the addition of 0.02% to 1% ethanol. It was thus concluded that ethanol enhances the aphidicolin-induced fragile sites, possibly inhibiting the repair mechanism of gaps and breaks induced by aphidicolin.     

Loss of heterozygosity and DNA damage repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of tumor suppressor genes is a crucial step in the development of sporadic and hereditary cancer. Understanding how LOH events arise may provide an opportunity for the prevention or early intervention of cancer development. In an effort to investigate the source of LOH events, we constructed MATalphacan1Delta::LEU2 and MATa CAN1 haploid yeast strains and examined canavanine-resistance mutations in a MATa CAN1/MATalphacan1Delta::LEU2 heterozygote formed by mating UV-irradiated and nonirradiated haploids. An increase in LOH was observed when the irradiated CAN1 haploid was mated with nonirradiated can1Delta::LEU2, while reversed irradiation only marginally increased LOH. In the rad51Delta background, allelic crossover type LOH increased following UV irradiation but not gene conversion. In the rad52Delta background, neither type of LOH increased. The chromosome structure following LOH and the requirement for Rad51 and Rad52 proteins indicated the involvement of gene conversion, allelic crossover and break-induced replication. We argued that LOH events could have occurred during the repair of double-strand breaks on a functional (damaged) but not nonfunctional (undamaged) chromosome through recombination.