Structure and dynamics of zooplankton communities in the littoral zone of some North Carolina lakes

Species composition and seasonal, dynamics of zooplankton in the littoral zone were studied in three piedmont North Carolina lakes for one year. Nygaard's compound index indicated oligotrophic conditions in Belews Lake and eutrophic conditions in Salem Lake and Lake 150. A total of 32 species of zooplankton were found in the samples. Significantly fewer species of truely littoral zooplankton were present in the oligotrophic lake regardless of season (P < 0.05). Eutrophication appears to favor increased diversity in zooplankton of the littoral zone. Habitat heterogeneity, provided by a well developed littoral zone containing aquatic macrophytes, may be the major factor contributing to the maintenance of more taxa of zooplankton in eutrophic systems.Distinct taxa of Cladocera and Copepoda are present in the littoral zone, exhibiting seasonal dynamics that are largely different from the limnetic fauna. Such dynamics may result from predation by characteristically limnetic species of cyclopoid copepods which seek prey in the littoral zone. The numerical and seasonal abundance of predators and prey are inversely related and the true littoral taxa, represented in the present study by the genera Alona, Chydorus, Pleuroxus, Sida, Simocephalus, and Eucyclops, contained no predaceous species. The seasonal dynamics of these genera are very similar even in widely separated geographical regions, indicating that the factor(s) responsible operate independently of climatic and chemical variables. Intrazooplankton predation appears to be a more plausable explanation than segregation along depth which, although consistent with data from studies of limnetic waters, cannot be related to populations of zooplankton in shallow littoral areas.     

Role of macrophytes in the variability of zooplankton community structure in the littoral zone of shallow lakes

Distribution, diurnal variability, aggregation of zooplankton in the littoral zone of lakes and effect of various macrophyte species on the structure of its community are considered. It is shown that the horizontal migrations of zooplankton, both direct and reverse ones, are caused mainly by the pressure of fish. The effect of predacious zooplankton is less important and is directed mainly at small-sized species. The intensity of horizontal migrations of zooplankton decreases with depth, while the effect of shore avoidance is observed for the large-sized zooplankton species and is caused not only by the pressure of fish but also by other factors, most likely abiotic. The problem of interaction between macrophytes and zooplankton cannot be reduced to the role of macrophytes as a refuge. Allelopathic properties of macrophytes, competitive relations between separate zooplankton species in macrophyte thickets, as well as the effect of predacious invertebrates associated with macrophytes on zooplankton remain unclear. The role of macrophytes as a factor causing changes in hydrodynamic processes in the littoral regions of lakes is also unknown.     

Horizontal migration of zooplankton in a littoral zone of the lowland Sulejow Reservoir (Central Poland)

Horizontal migrations of zooplankton between macrophyte patches and open areas were investigated in the sparsely vegetated littoral zone of the Sulejow Reservoir in June-July 2000 and 2001, using one-litre plastic traps. Large-bodied zooplankton: daphnids and copepods generally swam towards the open water at dusk and towards submerged macrophytes at dawn. Small-bodied zooplankton (Bosmina sp., Chydorus sp.) did not show any pattern of horizontal movement. At the time of the research the phytoplankton community was dominated by eatable diatoms (Cyclotella sp.), whose biomass reached 14 mg l⁻¹. Thus, bottom-up forces (food scarcity) are not likely to be responsible for the observed zooplankton migrations. Analyses of fish stomach contents showed high contribution of large zooplankters to the food of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) which densely inhabited the littoral zone of reservoir. High fish pressure in the littoral zone along with high density of the predatory cladoceran, Leptodora kindtii in the open water, suggest that top-down forces (predatory pressure) were responsible for the migration of large zooplankton. At dusk predatory pressure of fish fry exceeded that of L. kindtii, forcing endangered zooplankton to escape from macrophytes towards open water. The opposite situation occurred at dawn. The consequences of the relationships for both zooplankton and fish fry communities dynamics are discussed.

     

Invertebrate zooplankton predator composition and diversity in tropical lentic waters

Invertebrate zooplankton predators are generally less diverse in average species numbers in tropical than in temperate lakes and reservoirs. Predatory Copepoda which comprise the majority of limnetic predators are particularly low in species numbers in the tropics. Predatory Cladocera are confined to the North Temperate zone. Chaoborus appears to be cosmopolitan. Among Rotifera, only the cosmopolitan predator Asplanchna occurs in tropical waters while the other common limnetic carnivorous genus Ploesoma is restricted to higher latitudes. Hydracarina, and insects besides Chaoborus, are generally restricted to the littoral and appear to be more diverse in the tropics. Lakes Awasa and Zwai, Ethiopia, are almost devoid of predators in the limnetic, which is invaded by a littoral chydorid Alona diaphana. Low diversity of lake types and low production of tropical zooplankton could restrict predator diversity too. Very low diversity of invertebrate predators in the limnetic and higher diversity in the littoral may characterize tropical lakes in contrast to temperate lakes, which have more invertebrate predators in the limnetic and perhaps relatively less in the littoral. Tropical zooplankton in freshwaters, appears to be a very immature community. Hence opportunistic species can readily invade the limnetic and even dominate in isolated situations as has been shown for Alona davidi, Hydracarina and some other unconventional forms.     

A study of the zooplankton community of Billings Reservoir — São Paulo

The composition of the zooplankton of the Billings Reservoir and its variation in an eutrophic environment, subject to frequent blooms of algae (chiefly Cyanophyceae) was studied during one year (from October, 1977 to September, 1978) in two stations in the littoral and in the limnetic zone.The zooplankton community in the limnetic zone was dominated by cyclopoid copepods (Thermocyclops crassus and Metacyclops mendocinus) and by rotifers (Brachionus, Polyarthra and others) which represented, respectively 38.5 and 35.5% of the total zooplankton. At the littoral zone, cyclopoids were the most abundant (42.3%).The cladocerans were the least significant group at both stations, and calanoid copepods were found only at the littoral zone.A higher production of small filtrators, such as rotifers, cyclopoid nauplii and Bosmina sp was observed.     

Spatial Distribution of Zooplankton on the Upper Part of the Cheboksary Reservoir

The modern state of the species structure and spatial distribution of zooplankton cenoses in the upper part of the river hydraulics zone in the Cheboksary Reservoir, where the construction of a low-head dam is planned, and in the mouth part of the Oka River has been studied based on the data of 2016 and 2017. Two zooplankton communities have been identified in these areas; differences in their species structure are determined by several ecological factors: total mineralization, water transparency, temperature, pH, etc.     

Distribution and Interannual Changes of the Zooplankton of the Durgun Water Basin and Adjoining Water Objects (the Western Mongolia)

The article describes quantitative and structural characteristics of zooplankton of polytypic sites of a water system including a lake, canal, and a water reservoir. It is shown that in the littoral zone of lakes and water reservoirs, the number of species and communities is higher, and biomass, lower. However, in the littoral zone of shallow lake zooplankton in number, took priority due to Rotifera, in the deep part of the water body – Rotifera and Cladocera; in the center of the lake zooplankton dominated by biomass due to Cladocera and Copepoda, in the water reservoir—due to the Copepoda. The dam area of the water reservoir had the highest species richness of zooplankton among all studied sites. The greatest number and biomass of zooplankton within a waterbody are noted in upper part, where a sedimentation zone had formed, and as a whole for the system of the investigated waterbodies, the maximum quantity indices are typical of lake communities. It is revealed that the starkest interannual changes in zooplankton were observed in the shallow lake: the number of species decreased—in the littoral zone at the expense of Rotifera, and in the center, the biomass increased at the expense of Cladocera; in deep-water area of the dam area of the reservoir, conversely, the number of species, as well as the number and biomass of the community, increased due to Copepoda.     

Zooplankton in high-mountain lakes of Altai

In July to August 1999–2001, 53 zooplankton species were recorded in high-mountain lakes of Altai (1800–2400 m above sea level). The abundance of zooplankton varies considerably, but the average values of abundance and biomass are low. According to zooplankton characteristics, the high-mountain lakes are oligotrophic and oligosaprobic. The species composition of the zooplankton community depends on the area and depth of the lakes, and the quantitative indices, particularly in the littoral zone, are determined by water temperature.     

Influence of hydrophyte abundance on the spatial distribution of zooplankton in selected lakes in Greece

Submerged hydrophyte vegetation consists of a highly important biotic component of maintaining lake ecosystems towards a “clear water” ecological status. Aquatic macrophytes are well known to play a significant multidimensional role in lakes by competing with phytoplankton growth, stabilising sediment and offering refuge to fishes, macro-invertebrates and littoral zooplankton, amongst others. Zooplanktons that are associated with macrophyte beds, in particular, may act as a positive feedback mechanism that contributes to maintaining a clear-water state. Although there are several studies investigating the relationships between macrophytes and zooplankton in European lakes, few have yet been carried out in Greek lakes. Seasonal field sampling was conducted from spring 2006 to autumn 2008 in four lakes of northwestern Greece. Zooplankton samples were collected from within hydrophyte beds in each lake to estimate their relative abundance and species density. Hydrophyte abundance and composition was recorded on a five-point scale. Moreover, water samples were analysed to determine nutrient and chlorophyll-a concentration. Pearson correlations between zooplankton density and key physicochemical variables were conducted to distinguish significant abiotic variables related with major zooplankton groups. Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric analysis was used to test for significant differences in zooplankton composition and environmental variables amongst the five hydrophyte abundance classes. In addition, Canonical correspondence analysis was used to distinguish possible correlations amongst the macrophyte and zooplankton species. Zooplankton density was significantly higher in dense macrophyte vegetation. Small-sized species (e.g. Rotifera) dominated the zooplankton community, indicating the eutrophic nature of the lakes. Large Cladocera were present in low abundance and were mostly littoral. The current research contributes to a better understanding of relationships between biotic groups in selected Greek lakes.     

Zooplankton,fish and fisheries in tropical freshwaters

About 40% of all fish species occur in freshwater, although only 1% of the globe is occupied by freshwaters. The tropics harbour a high percentage of these fishes. Freshwater zooplankton on the other hand is far less diverse than its marine counterpart and the tropics do not harbour a markedly high percentage of freshwater species either. The antecedents of freshwater zooplankton appear to have come from riverine and terrestrial habitats via temporary habitats (ponds, floodplains). The present zooplankton composition has also been shaped by, among other factors, the highly efficient zooplanktivorous modern teleosts which have restricted the formerly widespread Branchiopoda mainly to fishless freshwaters. Those Branchiopoda frequently co-existing with fishes (Cladocera) have their size composition strongly influenced by fish predation. Circumstantial evidence indicates that pelagic zooplankton (Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera) appear to provide a relatively scarce food supply relative to the littoral region for the early stages of fishes. Also, unpredictability of zooplankton may be involved here. These factors have led to the loss of planktonic eggs and the siting of fish breeding in shallow littoral situations, where other animal foods besides zooplankton are also available, especially for later stages of juvenile fish. The Ostariophysi breed in the shallow expanses of flood waters while the Cichlidae, some of which breed like Ostariophysi, also breed in standing waters in the littoral of lakes or floodplains. In all these locations zooplankton and benthic organisms, especially insects, are available. The cichlids are, in addition, provided with parental care. Predation on young fishes is also reduced by these strategies. Young fishes may also be adapted to feed on patches of zooplankton and other food in their breeding grounds. Tropical pelagic clupeids and cyprinids may breed continuously. Some of these clupeids in rivers breed at low water.Zooplankton, supplemented by other animal food is more critical to achieving the potential fish yields in the tropics than in temperate freshwaters because fish yields in the tropics can be very high indeed. The high metabolic rate of young fishes in the tropics adds to the demand for food. Tropical freshwaters have a relatively high primary production but a low zooplankton/phytoplankton ratio. Zooplankton is kept small in size and biomass by continuous predation. Herbivorous fishes can sustain very high fish yields in the tropics but they must have a high fecundity and high survival of young produced seasonally, mainly in rivers or even continuously as in lakes and reservoirs to weather predation. Rich littoral zooplankton and benthos combined with omnivory and a higher efficiency in the use of the available animal food by newly hatched fishes may be critical factors linking fish yields to zooplankton in tropical freshwaters. The ability of herbivorous tilapias to give very high fish yields in shallow tropical lakes may also be due to their efficient use of animal food, algae and microphagy in young stages besides other favourable adaptations like opportunistic feeding on detrities and the ability to feed on and digest cyanobacteria, abundant in the tropics.     

新疆伊犁地区夏季浮游动物群落结构特征

2006年6-7月在新疆伊犁地区对伊犁河干流、三大支流(特克斯河、巩乃斯河和喀什河)、恰甫其海水库、吉林台水库、间歇性水体和小水塘中的浮游动物进行了调查.共鉴定浮游动物134属217种,其中原生动物95属153种, 占浮游动物物种数的71%;轮虫27属51种, 占23%;枝角类7属8种,占4%;桡足类5属5种,占2%.伊犁河干流、小水塘和间歇性水体浮游动物种类数较多,分别达132、114和92种,吉林台水库种类数最少,仅7种.浮游动物密度和生物量均以恰甫其海水库最高, 分别为11 391 ind·L-1和2.79 mg·L-1,特克斯河密度最低,为578 ind·L-1,喀什河生物量最低,为0.03 mg·L-1.相关分析和一元线性回归分析表明,浮游动物种类数与水体的流速呈显著负相关.采用种类数、密度和生物量对伊犁河干流、三大支流及两个水库的水质状况进行评价表明,伊犁河、特克斯河、喀什河、巩乃斯河为寡营养水体,恰甫其海水库和吉林台水库为中营养水体.     

The Chydorid Crustacean Alona diaphana (King), Limnetic in Lakes Awasa and Zwai,Ethiopia, with a Discussion of Littoral and Limnetic Zooplankton

Alona diaphana, a common littoral tropicopolitan cladoceran, occurs in the limnetic of two Ethiopian lakes in considerable numbers and over long periods of time. Our results are presented and the composition of limnetic and littoral zooplankton, in terms of previous records of such incursions, are discussed. The high persistent densities of A. diaphana are due to the extensive littoral areas in the lakes, where it originates, the high intrinsic rates of increase of this species, the low diversity of zooplankton, reducing competition and the low level of predation.     

Ecology and role of zooplankton in the fishery of Lake Naivasha

Taxonomic composition, distribution, community structure and seasonality of Lake Naivasha zooplankton between 1978 and 1980 are described. The ecological status of the zooplankton in relation to prevailing ecological factors and the lakes fishery are discussed. Species composition of the zooplankton community in Lake Naivasha has been remarkably constant since first observations between 1929 and 1931. The community structure and distribution of the zooplankton in the lake varied little from July 1978 to July 1980, however, there was evidence of species succession among the larger zooplankters, especially the cladocerans. In the littoral area zooplankton contribute significantly to the food and production of juvenile fish. There is an absence of fish zooplanktivores in the limnetic area of the lake. Consequently the limnetic zooplankton is not utilised by higher trophic levels.     

The influence of predation on horizontal distribution of zooplankton species

SUMMARY. 1. The horizontal distributions of Daphnia longispina and Bosmina tongispina in Lake Kvernavatn (Norway) were investigated twice in 1982. In late spring, when populations were small, the two species inhabited the same areas, and they were evenly distributed from the littoral to the pelagic. At high population densities, during midsummer, the species were spatially segregated, D. longispina being pelagic and B. longispina littoral in distribution.
2. The distribution and feeding of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasteros-teus aculeatus) were also studied. The sticklebacks were apparently forced into littoral areas by larger piscivorous predators in the pelagic and they were consequently restricted to foraging primarily on B. longispina, which formed dense swarms during daytime in summer.
3. We suggest that predation and competition influence the spatial distribution of zooplankton species. The feeding efficiency of fish foraging on high-density zooplankton populations can be reduced by spatial segregation of zooplankton species. Where high local densities occur, due to swarm formation, predation is changed from size-selective feeding to consumption of spatially isolated individuals.     

Seasonal strengths of the abiotic and biotic drivers of a zooplankton community

相似文献   

Features of the structure and spatial distribution of plankton in the Sheksna Reservoir

Based on the field studies conducted in August 2005 and 2007, the distributions of zooplankton structure and abundance, as well as chlorophyll content, in the Sheksna Reservoir are analyzed. A total of 107 zooplankton species have been found (46 Cladocera, 18 Copepoda, and 43 Rotifera), including 24 species (10 Cladocera, 2 Copepoda, and 12 Rotifera) new for the reservoir. In the surface layer of water, where blue-green algae concentrate, zooplankton abundance and biomass are 1.5–5 times lower and the zooplankton structure is simpler than in deeper layers. The highest zooplankton biomass (>3 g/m³) are observed in Lake Beloe and the upper area of the Sheksna section, while in the near-shore sites it did not exceed 1 g/m³. There are no significant changes in zooplankton abundance when compared to the abundance recorded at the end of the past century.     

Species richness of pelagic Cladocera of large lakes in the eastern hemisphere

The composition of the pelagic cladoceran species assemblages in some large, well-studied, lakes of Europe, Asia and Africa is reviewed based on original and literature data. In general, pelagic cladocerans are taxonomically less well studied than some littoral groups. Only the limnetic members of the family Sididae and some Daphnia have recently been revised, whereas knowledge of species diversity of other Daphniidae (including moinas) and Bosminidae is missing. Future detailed taxonomic studies may lead to considerable changes in understanding of limnetic zooplankton composition.     

Biomanipulation by ecotone management in a lowland reservoir

The comparative studies on fry of dominant fish species in the lowland Sulejow Reservoir have demonstrated the importance of an unstable ecotonal shoreline zone in whole system dynamics, which affects water quality. Ecotone zone utilization by fish determines their reproductive success and consequently pressure of fry on a zooplankton community. Density of perch, which dominates in the fry community of the Reservoir, influences the utilization of ecotonal resources by dominant cyprinid fry-roach. A reverse relationship between perch and roach fry densities has been demonstrated, which in turn, affects utilization of zooplankton by roach fry. At stations of highest perch density roach reduces feeding on zooplankton and eats more algae and insects. The knowledge of competitive relations between perch and cyprinid fry has been an important aspect of application of the biomanipulation concept in the reservoir ecosystem, to improve fish yield and water quality. Hypothetical models of energy flow through the reservoir's ecosystem with poor and well developed flooded riparian ecotonal zones are established.     

Intraspecific competition drives multiple species resource polymorphism in fish communities

It has been hypothesized that inter-specific competition will reduce species niche utilization and drive morphological evolution in character displacement. In the absence of a competitor, intra-specific competition may favor an expansion of the species niche and drive morphological evolution in character release. Despite of this theoretical framework, we sometimes find potential competitor species using the same niche range without any partitioning in niche. We used a database on test fishing in Sweden to evaluate the factors (inter- and intraspecific competition, predation, and abiotic factors) that could influence habitat choice of two competitor species. The pattern from the database shows that the occurrence of perch and roach occupying both littoral and pelagic habitats of lakes in Sweden is a general phenomenon. Furthermore, the results from the database suggest that this pattern is due to intra-specific competition rather than inter-specific competition or predation. In a field study, we estimated the morphological variation in perch and roach and found that, individuals of both species caught in the littoral zone were more deeper bodied compared to individuals caught in the pelagic zone. Pelagic perch fed more on zooplankton compared to littoral perch, independent of size, whereas the littoral perch had more macroinvertebrates and fish in their diet. Pelagic roach fed more on zooplankton compared to littoral roach, whereas littoral individuals fed more on plant material. Furthermore, we sampled littoral and pelagic fish from another lake to evaluate the generality of our first results and found the same habitat associated morphology in both perch and roach. The results show a consistent multi-species morphological separation in the littoral and pelagic habitats. This study suggests that intra-specific competition is possibly more important than inter-specific competition for the morphological pattern in the perch-roach system.     

Littoral zone of Lake Ladoga: ecological state evaluation

The littoral zone of a lake is an important ecotone between terrestrial and aquatic systems. From the point of view of the lake ecosystem, much of the mineral, organic and toxic substances entering the lake from the drainage basin are transformed in the littoral zone by physical processes and biochemical pathways. The littoral zone of Lake Ladoga can be divided into three main regions: the shallow southern region, the fairly steep western and eastern shorelines, and the northern archipelago. In these regions, the communities of aquatic macrophytes, periphyton, phyto- and zooplankton and meio- and macrobenthos have been extensively studied. This paper presents numerical data on these communities, with special reference to comparisons between areas subjected to different degrees of anthropogenic loading. Most of the communities are characterized by high species diversity and spatial heterogeneity, especially among the macrophyte associations in which intensive production and decomposition takes place. Water dynamics and water exchange rate are the main abiotic factors in the formation of littoral communities. The characteristics of plant associations and bottom substrate, rather than pollution, appear as the most important factors structuring meio- and macrobenthic invertebrate communities in the littoral.