The Escherichia coli major exoribonuclease RNase II is a component of the RNA degradosome

Multiprotein complexes that carry out RNA degradation and processing functions are found in cells from all domains of life. In Escherichia coli, the RNA degradosome, a four-protein complex, is required for normal RNA degradation and processing. In addition to the degradosome complex, the cell contains other ribonucleases that also play important roles in RNA processing and/or degradation. Whether the other ribonucleases are associated with the degradosome or function independently is not known. In the present work, IP (immunoprecipitation) studies from cell extracts showed that the major hydrolytic exoribonuclease RNase II is associated with the known degradosome components RNaseE (endoribonuclease E), RhlB (RNA helicase B), PNPase (polynucleotide phosphorylase) and Eno (enolase). Further evidence for the RNase II-degradosome association came from the binding of RNase II to purified RNaseE in far western affinity blot experiments. Formation of the RNase II–degradosome complex required the degradosomal proteins RhlB and PNPase as well as a C-terminal domain of RNaseE that contains binding sites for the other degradosomal proteins. This shows that the RNase II is a component of the RNA degradosome complex, a previously unrecognized association that is likely to play a role in coupling and coordinating the multiple elements of the RNA degradation pathways.     

The PNPase,exosome and RNA helicases as the building components of evolutionarily-conserved RNA degradation machines

The structure and function of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and the exosome, as well as their associated RNA-helicases proteins, are described in the light of recent studies. The picture raised is of an evolutionarily conserved RNA-degradation machine which exonucleolytically degrades RNA from 3′ to 5′. In prokaryotes and in eukaryotic organelles, a trimeric complex of PNPase forms a circular doughnut-shaped structure, in which the phosphorolysis catalytic sites are buried inside the barrel-shaped complex, while the RNA binding domains create a pore where RNA enters, reminiscent of the protein degrading complex, the proteasome. In some archaea and in the eukaryotes, several different proteins form a similar circle-shaped complex, the exosome, that is responsible for 3′ to 5′ exonucleolytic degradation of RNA as part of the processing, quality control, and general RNA degradation process. Both PNPase in prokaryotes and the exosome in eukaryotes are found in association with protein complexes that notably include RNA helicase.     

The crucial role of PNPase in the degradation of small RNAs that are not associated with Hfq

The transient existence of small RNAs free of binding to the RNA chaperone Hfq is part of the normal dynamic lifecycle of a sRNA. Small RNAs are extremely labile when not associated with Hfq, but the mechanism by which Hfq stabilizes sRNAs has been elusive. In this work we have found that polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is the major factor involved in the rapid degradation of small RNAs, especially those that are free of binding to Hfq. The levels of MicA, GlmY, RyhB, and SgrS RNAs are drastically increased upon PNPase inactivation in Hfq(-) cells. In the absence of Hfq, all sRNAs are slightly shorter than their full-length species as result of 3'-end trimming. We show that the turnover of Hfq-free small RNAs is growth-phase regulated, and that PNPase activity is particularly important in stationary phase. Indeed, PNPase makes a greater contribution than RNase E, which is commonly believed to be the main enzyme in the decay of small RNAs. Lack of poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I) is also found to affect the rapid degradation of Hfq-free small RNAs, although to a lesser extent. Our data also suggest that when the sRNA is not associated with Hfq, the degradation occurs mainly in a target-independent pathway in which RNase III has a reduced impact. This work demonstrated that small RNAs free of Hfq binding are preferably degraded by PNPase. Overall, our data highlight the impact of 3'-exonucleolytic RNA decay pathways and re-evaluates the degradation mechanisms of Hfq-free small RNAs.     

Importance of the leader region of mRNA for translation initiation of ColE2 Rep protein

Translation initiation of mRNA encoding the Rep protein of the ColE2 plasmid required for initiation of plasmid DNA replication is fairly efficient in Escherichia coli cells despite the absence of a canonical Shine-Dalgarno sequence. To define sequences and structural elements responsible for translation efficiency of the Rep mRNA, a series of rep-lacZalpha translational fusions bearing various mutations in the region encoding the leader region of the Rep mRNA was generated and tested for the translation activity by measuring the beta-galactosidase activity. We showed that the region rich in A and U between the stem-loop II structure and GA cluster sequence, formation of the stem-loop II structure, but not its sequence, and the region between the GA cluster sequence and initiation codon are important along with the GA cluster sequence for efficient translation of the Rep protein. The existence of these important regions in the leader region of the Rep mRNA may explain the mechanism of inhibition of the Rep protein translation by an antisense RNA (RNAI), which is complementary to the leader region.     

Recognition and cooperation between the ATP-dependent RNA helicase RhlB and ribonuclease RNase E

The Escherichia coli protein RhlB is an ATP-dependent motor that unfolds structured RNA for destruction by partner ribonucleases. In E. coli, and probably many other related gamma-proteobacteria, RhlB associates with the essential endoribonuclease RNase E as part of the multi-enzyme RNA degradosome assembly. The interaction with RNase E boosts RhlB's ATPase activity by an order of magnitude. Here, we examine the origins and implications of this effect. The location of the interaction sites on both RNase E and RhlB are refined and analysed using limited protease digestion, domain cross-linking and homology modelling. These data indicate that RhlB's carboxy-terminal RecA-like domain engages a segment of RNase E that is no greater than 64 residues. The interaction between RhlB and RNase E has two important consequences: first, the interaction itself stimulates the unwinding and ATPase activities of RhlB; second, RhlB gains proximity to two RNA-binding sites on RNase E, with which it cooperates to unwind RNA. Our homology model identifies a pattern of residues in RhlB that may be key for recognition of RNase E and which may communicate the activating effects. Our data also suggest that the association with RNase E may partially repress the RNA-binding activity of RhlB. This repression may in fact permit the interplay of the helicase and adjacent RNA binding segments as part of a process that steers substrates to either processing or destruction, depending on context, within the RNA degradosome assembly.     

The Rep protein binding elements of the plasmid ColE2-P9 replication origin

The plasmid ColE2-P9 (ColE2) origin (32bp) is specifically recognized by the plasmid-specified Rep protein that initiates DNA replication. The ColE2 origin is divided into at least three functional subregions (I, II, and III), and three sites (a, b, and c) found in subregions I and II play important roles in Rep protein binding. We performed SELEX experiments of plasmid ColE2 to determine the optimal sequences for specific binding of the Rep protein. From these experiments, we obtained a common 16-bp sequence (5'-TGAGACCANATAAGCC-3'), which corresponds to about one half of the minimal ColE2 origin and contains sites a and b. Gel mobility shift assays using single-point mutant origins and the Rep protein further indicated that high affinity sequence-specific recognition by the Rep protein requires sites a, b, and c, but that mutations in site c were less disruptive to this recognition than those in sites a and b.     

Studies of the RNA degradosome-organizing domain of the Escherichia coli ribonuclease RNase E

The hydrolytic endoribonuclease RNase E, which is widely distributed in bacteria and plants, plays key roles in mRNA degradation and RNA processing in Escherichia coli. The enzymatic activity of RNase E is contained within the conserved amino-terminal half of the 118 kDa protein, and the carboxy-terminal half organizes the RNA degradosome, a multi-enzyme complex that degrades mRNA co-operatively and processes ribosomal and other RNA. The study described herein demonstrates that the carboxy-terminal domain of RNase E has little structure under native conditions and is unlikely to be extensively folded within the degradosome. However, three isolated segments of 10-40 residues, and a larger fourth segment of 80 residues, are predicted to be regions of increased structural propensity. The larger of these segments appears to be a protein-RNA interaction site while the other segments possibly correspond to sites of self-recognition and interaction with the other degradosome proteins. The carboxy-terminal domain of RNase E may thus act as a flexible tether of the degradosome components. The implications of these and other observations for the organization of the RNA degradosome are discussed.     

Replication initiator protein mRNA of ColE2 plasmid and its antisense regulator RNA are under the control of different degradation pathways

Replication of the ColE2 plasmid requires a plasmid-coded initiator protein (Rep). Rep expression is controlled by antisense RNA (RNAI) against the Rep mRNA at a translational step. In this paper, we examined the effects of host RNA degradation enzymes on the degradation process of the Rep mRNA and its degradation intermediates especially those carrying the 5' untranslated region. We showed that the Rep mRNA is subjected to complex degradation pathways involving at least RNase I, RNase II, RNase III, RNase E, RNase G and PNPase. RNase II acts as a major exoribonuclease and PNPase plays a minor role. We also showed that the PcnB (polyA polymerase I) plays only a minor role in the Rep mRNA degradation process. The RNA degradation pathways of the Rep mRNA and RNAI of the ColE2 plasmid are quite different. Based on these results, we speculate that the ColE2 Rep mRNA and RNAI are endowed with individual RNA half lives required for the efficient copy number control by being subjected to different RNA degradation systems.     

Structural characterization of the RNase E S1 domain and identification of its oligonucleotide-binding and dimerization interfaces

S1 domains occur in four of the major enzymes of mRNA decay in Escherichia coli: RNase E, PNPase, RNase II, and RNase G. Here, we report the structure of the S1 domain of RNase E, determined by both X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. The RNase E S1 domain adopts an OB-fold, very similar to that found with PNPase and the major cold shock proteins, in which flexible loops are appended to a well-ordered five-stranded beta-barrel core. Within the crystal lattice, the protein forms a dimer stabilized primarily by intermolecular hydrophobic packing. Consistent with this observation, light-scattering, chemical crosslinking, and NMR spectroscopic measurements confirm that the isolated RNase E S1 domain undergoes a specific monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution with a K(D) value in the millimolar range. The substitution of glycine 66 with serine dramatically destabilizes the folded structure of this domain, thereby providing an explanation for the temperature-sensitive phenotype associated with this mutation in full-length RNase E. Based on amide chemical shift perturbation mapping, the binding surface for a single-stranded DNA dodecamer (K(D)=160(+/-40)microM) was identified as a groove of positive electrostatic potential containing several exposed aromatic side-chains. This surface, which corresponds to the conserved ligand-binding cleft found in numerous OB-fold proteins, lies distal to the dimerization interface, such that two independent oligonucleotide-binding sites can exist in the dimeric form of the RNase E S1 domain. Based on these data, we propose that the S1 domain serves a dual role of dimerization to aid in the formation of the tetrameric quaternary structure of RNase E as described by Callaghan et al. in 2003 and of substrate binding to facilitate RNA hydrolysis by the adjacent catalytic domains within this multimeric enzyme.     

The rne gene is the structural gene for the processing endoribonuclease RNase E of Escherichia coli.

Summary Using T7 RNA polymerase and specific constructs derived from 5S rRNA and RNA I genes, we generated substrates for the RNA processing enzyme RNase E. Using these substrates we have shown that a 3.2 kb DNA fragment that complements the rne-3071 mutation can express RNase E activity. We also found that T7 RNA polymerase terminates within the 5S rRNA gene.     

Analysis of the human polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) reveals differences in RNA binding and response to phosphate compared to its bacterial and chloroplast counterparts

PNPase is a major exoribonuclease that plays an important role in the degradation, processing, and polyadenylation of RNA in prokaryotes and organelles. This phosphorolytic processive enzyme uses inorganic phosphate and nucleotide diphosphate for degradation and polymerization activities, respectively. Its structure and activities are similar to the archaeal exosome complex. The human PNPase was recently localized to the intermembrane space (IMS) of the mitochondria, and is, therefore, most likely not directly involved in RNA metabolism, unlike in bacteria and other organelles. In this work, the degradation, polymerization, and RNA-binding properties of the human PNPase were analyzed and compared to its bacterial and organellar counterparts. Phosphorolytic activity was displayed at lower optimum concentrations of inorganic phosphate. Also, the RNA-binding properties to ribohomopolymers varied significantly from those of its bacterial and organellar enzymes. The purified enzyme did not preferentially bind RNA harboring a poly(A) tail at the 3' end, compared to a molecule lacking this tail. Several site-directed mutations at conserved amino acid positions either eliminated or modified degradation/polymerization activity in different manners than observed for the Escherichia coli PNPase and the archaeal and human exosomes. In light of these results, a possible function of the human PNPase in the mitochondrial IMS is discussed.     

Footprinting analysis of interactions between the largest eukaryotic RNase P/MRP protein Pop1 and RNase P/MRP RNA components

Ribonuclease (RNase) P and RNase MRP are closely related catalytic ribonucleoproteins involved in the metabolism of a wide range of RNA molecules, including tRNA, rRNA, and some mRNAs. The catalytic RNA component of eukaryotic RNase P retains the core elements of the bacterial RNase P ribozyme; however, the peripheral RNA elements responsible for the stabilization of the global architecture are largely absent in the eukaryotic enzyme. At the same time, the protein makeup of eukaryotic RNase P is considerably more complex than that of the bacterial RNase P. RNase MRP, an essential and ubiquitous eukaryotic enzyme, has a structural organization resembling that of eukaryotic RNase P, and the two enzymes share most of their protein components. Here, we present the results of the analysis of interactions between the largest protein component of yeast RNases P/MRP, Pop1, and the RNA moieties of the enzymes, discuss structural implications of the results, and suggest that Pop1 plays the role of a scaffold for the stabilization of the global architecture of eukaryotic RNase P RNA, substituting for the network of RNA–RNA tertiary interactions that maintain the global RNA structure in bacterial RNase P.     

Use of RNA Secondary Structure for Studying the Evolution of RNase P and RNase MRP

Secondary structure is evaluated for determining evolutionary relationships between catalytic RNA molecules that are so distantly related they are scarcely alignable. The ribonucleoproteins RNase P (P) and RNase MRP (MRP) have been suggested to be evolutionarily related because of similarities in both function and secondary structure. However, their RNA sequences cannot be aligned with any confidence, and this leads to uncertainty in any trees inferred from sequences. We report several approaches to using secondary structures for inferring evolutionary trees and emphasize quantitative tests to demonstrate that evolutionary information can be recovered. For P and MRP, three hypotheses for the relatedness are considered. The first is that MRP is derived from P in early eukaryotes. The next is that MRP is derived from P from an early endosymbiont. The third is that both P and MRP evolved in the RNA-world (and the need for MRP has since been lost in prokaryotes). Quantitative comparisons of the pRNA and mrpRNA secondary structures have found that the possibility of an organellar origin of MRP is unlikely. In addition, comparison of secondary structures support the identity of an RNase P–like sequence in the maize chloroplast genome. Overall, it is concluded that RNA secondary structure is useful for evaluating evolutionary relatedness, even with sequences that cannot be aligned with confidence. Received: 19 July 1999 / Accepted: 3 May 2000