Closing of Venus Flytrap by Electrical Stimulation of Motor Cells

Electrical signaling and rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) have been attracting the attention of researchers since XIX century, but the exact mechanism of Venus flytrap closure is still unknown. We found that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap leaf by activating motor cells without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The closing time of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation of motor cells is 0.3 s, the same as mechanically induced closing. The mean electrical charge required for the closure of the Venus flytrap leaf is 13.6 µC. Ion channel blockers such as Ba²⁺, TEACl as well as uncouplers such as FCCP, 2,4-dinitrophenol and pentachlorophenol dramatically decrease the speed of the trap closing. Using an ultra-fast data acquisition system with measurements in real time, we found that the action potential in the Venus flytrap has a duration time of about 1.5 ms. Our results demonstrate that electrical stimulation can be used to study mechanisms of fast activity in motor cells of the plant kingdom.Key Words: action potential, electrophysiology, electrical signaling, Venus flytrap, motor cells     

Biologically Closed Electrical Circuits in Venus Flytrap

The Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) is a marvel of plant electrical, mechanical, and biochemical engineering. The rapid closure of the Venus flytrap upper leaf in about 0.1 s is one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom. We found earlier that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The Venus flytrap can accumulate small subthreshold charges and, when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. Here, we investigated the electrical properties of the upper leaf of the Venus flytrap and proposed the equivalent electrical circuit in agreement with the experimental data.     

Active movements in plants: Mechanism of trap closure by Dionaea muscipula Ellis

The Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) captures insects with one of the most rapid movements in the plant kingdom. We investigated trap closure by mechanical and electrical stimuli using the novel charge-injection method and high-speed recording. We proposed a new hydroelastic curvature mechanism, which is based on the assumption that the lobes possess curvature elasticity and are composed of outer and inner hydraulic layers with different hydrostatic pressure. The open state of the trap contains high elastic energy accumulated due to the hydrostatic pressure difference between the hydraulic layers of the lobe. Stimuli open pores connecting the two layers, water rushes from one hydraulic layer to another, and the trap relaxes to the equilibrium configuration corresponding to the closed state. In this paper we derived equations describing this system based on elasticity Hamiltonian and found closing kinetics. The novel charge-injection stimulation method gives insight into mechanisms of the different steps of signal transduction and response in the plant kingdom.Key words: hydroelastic model, electrical signaling, electrophysiology, hydroelastic curvature, venus flytrap, ion channels, water channels     

A mathematical model on the closing and opening mechanism for Venus flytrap

This paper investigates the opening and closing mechanism for the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula). A mathematical model has been proposed to explain how the flytrap transitions between open, semi-closed and closed states. The model accounts for the charge accumulation of action potentials, which generated by mechanical stimulation of the sensitive trigger hairs on the lobes of the flytrap. Though many studies have been reported for the Venus flytrap opening and closing mechanism, this paper attempts to explain the mechanism from nonlinear dynamics and control perspective.Key words: Venus flytrap, modelling, kinetics     

Zuckerbrot und Peitsche

Marantaceae (arrowrood) are among the few examples of plants showing unexpectedly fast movements such as the ones in the meaningful mimosa or carnivorous plants. In the Venus flytrap (Dionaea), the movement of leaves is an extreme fast reaction to mechanical stimuli and based on the propagation of electrical signals. Of course, it was interesting to investigate, whether the explosively moving style of Marantaceae is based on a comparable mechanism. Electrophysiological experiments helped to understand how one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom is mediated.     

Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties

The total hunting cycle of the Venus flytrap consists of five stages: 1. Open state → 2. Closed state → 3. Locked state → 4. Constriction and digestion → 5. Semi-open state → 1. Open state. The opening of the trap after digestion consists of two steps: opening of the lobes, and changing of their curvature from concave to convex shape. Uncouplers carbonylcyanide-4-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone (FCCP) and carbonylcyanide-3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) inhibit the trap from opening for two weeks and antracene-9-carboxylic acid inhibits the trap from constricting. Different stages of the hunting cycle have different electrical characteristics. The biologically closed electrochemical circuits in the Venus flytrap are analyzed using the charged capacitor method. If the initial voltage applied to the Venus flytrap is 0.5 V or greater, changing the polarity of the electrodes between the midrib and one of the lobes results in a rectification effect and in different kinetics of discharge capacitance. These effects can be caused by the fast transport of ions through ion channels. The electrical properties of the Venus flytrap were investigated and equivalent electrical circuits within the upper leaf were proposed to explain the experimental data.     

Electrotonic and action potentials in the Venus flytrap

The electrical phenomena and morphing structures in the Venus flytrap have attracted researchers since the nineteenth century. We have observed that mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs on the lobes of the Venus flytrap induces electrotonic potentials in the lower leaf. Electrostimulation of electrical circuits in the Venus flytrap can induce electrotonic potentials propagating along the upper and lower leaves. The instantaneous increase or decrease in voltage of stimulating potential generates a nonlinear electrical response in plant tissues. Any electrostimulation that is not instantaneous, such as sinusoidal or triangular functions, results in linear responses in the form of small electrotonic potentials. The amplitude and sign of electrotonic potentials depend on the polarity and the amplitude of the applied voltage. Electrical stimulation of the lower leaf induces electrical signals, which resemble action potentials, in the trap between the lobes and the midrib. The trap closes if the stimulating voltage is above the threshold level of 4.4 V. Electrical responses in the Venus flytrap were analyzed and reproduced in the discrete electrical circuit. The information gained from this study can be used to elucidate the coupling of intracellular and intercellular communications in the form of electrical signals within plants.     

Energetics and forces of the Dionaea muscipula trap closing

The Venus flytrap is the most famous carnivorous plant. The electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf in 0.3 s without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. Here we present results for direct measurements of the closing force of the trap of Dionaea muscipula Ellis after mechanical or electrical stimulation of the trap using the piezoelectric thin film or Fuji Prescale indicating sensor film. The closing force was 0.14 N and the corresponding pressure between rims of two lobes was 38 kPa. We evaluated theoretically using the Hydroelastic Curvature Model and compared with experimental data velocity, acceleration and kinetic energy from the time dependencies of distance between rims of lobes during the trap closing. The Charge Stimulation Method was used for trap electrostimulation between the midrib and lobes. From the dependence of voltage between two Ag/AgCl electrodes in the midrib and one of the lobes, we estimated electrical charge, current, resistance, electrical energy and electrical power dependencies on time during electrostimulation of the trap.     

Plant electrical memory

Electrical signaling, short-term memory and rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) have been attracting the attention of researchers since the XIX century. We found that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The closing time of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation is the same as mechanically induced closing. Transmission of a single electrical charge between a lobe and the midrib causes closure of the trap and induces an electrical signal propagating between both lobes and midrib. The Venus flytrap can accumulate small subthreshold charges, and when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. Repeated application of smaller charges demonstrates the summation of stimuli. The cumulative character of electrical stimuli points to the existence of short-term electrical memory in the Venus flytrap.Key words: plant memory, electrophysiology, electrical signaling, venus flytrap, Dionaea muscipula ellisPlants are capable of intelligent responses to complex environmental signals.^1–27 Signaling and memory play fundamental roles in plant responses. The existence of different forms of plant memory is well known.^1–22 Depending on the duration of memory retention, there are three types of memory in plants: sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory. A few examples of studies involving plant memory are: transgeneration memory of stress,^1,6,10 immunological memory of tobacco plants²² and mountain birches,¹⁸ storage and recall functions in seedlings,⁹ chromatin remodelling in plant development,^4,19 vernalization and epigenetic memory of winter,^12,13 induced resistance and susceptibility to herbivory,² memory response in ABA-entrained plants,⁶ memory of stimulus,^16,17 and systematic acquired resistance in plants exposed to a pathogen.²² Cellular memory is an example of long term memory and is a long-term maintenance of a particular pattern of gene expression. Chromatin dynamics including histone modification, histone replacement and chromatin remodeling play key roles in cellular memory.⁴ Plants are intelligent organisms and capable of functions such as learning, individuality, plasticity and memory.⁵ There are a few mathematical models of plant learning and memory.^14,15 Some plants exhibit clues of an electrical memory as well.We found that Venus flytrap has a short term electrical memory^20,21 Rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) has been attracting the attention of researchers and as a result its mechanism has been widely investigated. When an insect touches the trigger hairs, these mechanosensors generate an electrical signal that acts as an action potential, which activates the trap closing. Macfarlane²³ found that two mechanical stimuli required for the trap closing should be applied within an interval from 0.75 s to 20 s. Brown and Sharp²⁴ found that at high temperature of 35–40°C usually only one mechanical stimulus is required.The inducement of non-excitability after excitation and the summation of subthreshold irritations were developed in the vegetative and animal kingdoms in protoplasmic structures prior to morphological differentiation of nervous tissues. These protoplasmic structures merged into the organs of a nervous system and adjusted the interfacing of the organism with the environment. Some neuromotoric components include acetylcholine neurotransmitters, cellular messenger calmodulin, cellular motors actin and myosin, voltage-gated channels, and sensors for touch, light, gravity and temperature.^25–27 Although this nerve-like cellular equipment has not reached the same great complexity as in animal nerves, a simple neural network has been formed within the plasma membrane of a phloem or plasmodesmata enabling it to communicate efficiently over long distances.^5,26,27 The reason why plants have developed pathways for electrical signal transmission most probably lies in the necessity to respond rapidly to environmental stress factors. Different environmental stimuli evoke specific responses in living cells, which have the capacity to transmit a signal to the responding region. In contrast to chemical signals such as hormones, electrical signals are able to rapidly transmit information over long distances.²⁷ Electrical potentials have been measured at the tissue and whole plant levels.²⁶Using our new charge injection method,²⁰ it was evident that the application of an electrical stimulus between the midrib (positive potential) and a lobe (negative potential) causes Venus flytrap to close the trap without any mechanical stimulation. The average stimulation pulse voltage sufficient for rapid closure of the Venus flytrap was 1.50 V (standard deviation is 0.01 V, n = 50) for 1 s. The inverted polarity pulse with negative voltage applied to the midrib did not close the plant. Applying impulses in the same voltage range with different polarities for pulses of up to 100 s did not open the plant. It was found that energy for trap closure is generated by ATP hydrolysis. ATP is used by the motor cells for a fast transport of protons. The amount of ATP drops from 950 µM per midrib before mechanical stimulation to 650 µM per midrib after stimulation and closure.²⁸ However, it is not clear if electrical stimulation triggers closing process in the motor cells, or contributes energy to the closing action.The action potential delivers sufficient electrical charge to the midrib,²¹ which can activate the osmotic motor. To check this hypothesis, we measured effects of transmitted charge from the charged capacitors between the lobe and the midrib of Venus flytrap. Transmission of a single electrical charge (mean 13.63 µC, median 14.00 µC, std. dev. 1.51 µC, n = 41) causes trap closure and induces an electrical signal propagating between the lobes and the midrib. The electrical signal in the lobes was not an action potential, because its amplitude depended on the applied voltage from the charged capacitor. Charge induced closing of a trap plant can be repeated 2–3 times on the same Venus flytrap plant after reopening. Transmission of a single electrical charge (mean 13.63 µC, median 14.00 µC, std. dev. 1.51 µC, n = 41) causes the trap to close and induces an electrical signal that propagates between the lobe and the midrib. Figure 1 illustrates that the Venus flytrap can accumulate small charges, and when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. A summation of stimuli is demonstrated through the repetitive application of smaller charges. If we apply two or more consecutive injections of electrical charge within a period of less than 50 s, the trap will close when a total of 14 µC charge is reached.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Mechanism of the Dionaea trap closure.Repeated application of smaller charges demonstrates a summation of stimuli. If we apply two or more injections of electrical charges within a period of less then 20 s, the Venus flytrap upper leaf closes as soon as the total of 14 µC charge is transmitted. Similar phenomenon was reported by Czaja,²⁹ who determined the intensity of threshold stimuli to be 2.4 µC for a closing electrostimulation of another carnivorous plant Aldrovanda vesiculosa, and 0.91 µC for an opening electrostimulation. Our attempts to open the Venus flytrap upper leaf by changing polarity of injected charge and increasing the charge from 14 µC to 100 µC were not successful. Usually, the trap opens a few days after closing in the same way as after mechanically stimulated closing.Previous work by Brown and Sharp²⁴ indicated that electrical shock between lower and upper leaves can cause the Venus flytrap to close, but in their article, the amplitude and polarity of applied voltage, charge and electrical current were not reported. The trap did not close when we applied the same electrostimulation between the upper and lower leaves as we applied between a midrib and a lobe, even when the injected charge was increased from 14 µC to 750 µC. It is probable that the electroshock induced by Brown and Sharp²⁴ had a very high voltage or electrical current.It is common knowledge that the leaves of the Venus flytrap actively employ turgor pressure and hydrodynamic flow for fast movement and catching insects. In these processes the upper and lower surfaces of the leaf behave quite differently. During the trap closing, the loss of turgor by parenchyma lying beneath the upper epidermis, accompanied by the active expansion of the tissues of the lower layers of parenchyma near the under epidermis, closes the trap. The cells on the inner face of the trap jettison their cargo of water, shrink and allow the trap lobe to fold over. The cells of the lower epidermis expand rapidly, folding the trap lobe over. These anatomical features constitute the basis of the new hydroelastic curvature model.²⁰In terms of electrophysiology, Venus flytrap responses can be considered in three stages: (i) stimulus perception, (ii) signal transmission and (iii) induction of response (Fig. 1).     

Structure-function relationships in a bacterial DING protein

A recombinant DING protein from Pseudomonas fluorescens has been previously shown to have a phosphate-binding site, and to be mitogenic for human cells. Here we report the three-dimensional structure of the protein, confirming a close similarity to the "Venus flytrap" structure seen in other human and bacterial phosphate-binding proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis confirms the role of a key residue involved in phosphate binding, and that the mitogenic activity is not dependent on this property. Deletion of one of the two hinged domains that constitute the Venus flytrap also eliminates phosphate binding whilst enhancing mitogenic activity.     

Venus flytrap biomechanics: Forces in the Dionaea muscipula trap

Biomechanics of morphing structures in the Venus flytrap has attracted the attention of scientists during the last 140 years. The trap closes in a tenth of a second if a prey touches a trigger hair twice. The driving force of the closing process is most likely due to the elastic curvature energy stored and locked in the leaves, which is caused by a pressure differential between the upper and lower layers of the leaf. The trap strikes, holds and compresses the prey. We have developed new methods for measuring all these forces involved in the hunting cycle. We made precise calibration of the piezoelectric sensor and performed direct measurements of the average impact force of the trap closing using a high speed video camera for the determination of time constants. The new equation for the average impact force was derived. The impact average force between rims of two lobes in the Venus flytrap was found equal to 149 mN and the corresponding pressure between the rims was about 41 kPa. Direct measurements of the constriction force in the trap of Dionaea muscipula was performed during gelatin digestion. This force increases in the process of digestion from zero to 450 mN with maximal constriction pressure created by the lobes reaching to 9 kPa. The insects and different small prey have little chance to escape after the snap of the trap. The prey would need to overpower the “escaping” force which is very strong and can reach up to 4 N.     

Molecular mechanism of the allosteric enhancement of the umami taste sensation

The fifth taste quality, umami, arises from binding of glutamate to the umami receptor T1R1/T1R3. The umami taste is enhanced several-fold upon addition of free nucleotides such as guanosine-5'-monophosphate (GMP) to glutamate-containing food. GMP may operate via binding to the ligand-binding domain of the T1R1 part of the umami receptor at an allosteric site. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we show that GMP can stabilize the closed (active) state of T1R1 by binding to the outer vestibule of the so-called Venus flytrap domain of the receptor. The transition between the closed and open conformations was accessed in the simulations. Using principal component analysis, we show that the dynamics of the Venus flytrap domain along the hinge-bending motion that activates signaling is dampened significantly upon binding of glutamate, and further slows down upon binding of GMP at an allosteric site, thus suggesting a molecular mechanism of cooperativity between GMP and glutamate.     

Opening and closing motions in the periplasmic vitamin B12 binding protein BtuF

BtuF is the periplasmic binding protein (PBP) in the vitamin B(12) uptake system in Escherichia coli where it is associated with the ABC transporter BtuCD. When the ligand binds, PBPs generally display large conformational changes, commonly termed the Venus flytrap mechanism. BtuF belongs to a group of PBPs that, on the basis of crystal structures, does not appear to display such behavior. Using 480 ns multicopy molecular dynamics simulations of apo and holo forms of the protein, we investigate the dynamics of BtuF. We find BtuF to be more flexible than previously assumed, displaying clear opening and closing motions which are more pronounced in the apo form. The protein behavior is compatible with a PBP functional model that postulates a closed conformation for the ligand-bound state, whereas the empty form fluctuates between open and closed conformations. Elastic network normal-mode analysis suggests that all BtuF-like PBPs are capable of similar opening and closing motions. It also makes the typical Venus flytrap domain motions a likely common means of how PBP-ABC transporter interaction could occur.     

Dionaea muscipula (Venus Flytrap) Establishment, Release, and Response of Associated Species in Mowed Patches on the Rims of Carolina Bays

Carolina bays are depression wetlands of high conservation value that occur across the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States. Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) is one rare carnivorous plant that grows in open habitats on the rims of Carolina bays. Without frequent burning, vegetation on bay rims becomes dominated by evergreen shrubs and Venus flytrap populations decline. This project examined the utility of mechanical mowing, soil clearing, transplanting, and seeding as an approach to restoring populations of Venus flytraps when fire is precluded. Mowing of patches on bay rims produced open sites with little ground‐layer vegetation. After two growing seasons, adult Venus flytraps transplanted to mowed patches showed high survivorship and relatively high leaf number/plant. Suppressed Venus flytraps existing on‐site quickly initiated growth in response to mowing. These volunteers and the transplants had higher flowering percentages than plants in reference populations. Seeds of Venus flytraps were scattered in mowed and cleared plots. Seedling establishment was low, but seedlings persisted into the second growing season. Mowing created suitable habitat for growth and flowering of adult Venus flytraps and facilitated establishment of two other carnivorous species, Sundew (Drosera capillaris) and Bladderwort (Utricularia subulata). But, mowing and clearing also facilitated invasion by four species of grasses and rushes; evergreen shrubs resprouted quickly after mowing. Maintaining persistent openings by mowing the rims of Carolina bays will be an ongoing challenge due to availability of potential invaders and rapid regrowth of shrubs.     

A quantitative study of tissue dynamics in Venus's flytrap Dionaea muscipula (Droseraceae). II. Trap reopening

Changes in normalized cell length (NCL) and tissue volume densities (V_v) of five trap tissues were studied during reopening of fully closed traps of Venus's flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). Four trap-reopening stages were identified based on morphological changes observed in time-lapse video: (1) Sealed—the last stage of trap closure before the trap began to reopen; (2) Deappressed—characterized by a convex bulge in the upper region of the trap; (3) Release—in which the bulge region moved closer to the trap margins initiating lobe separation while the marginal tynes remained interdigitated; (4) Fully opened—the trap lobes assumed a morphology similar to that of a nonstimulated trap. Morphological changes associated with trap reopening occurred as a series of relatively fast (l-5h) and slow (10-15 h) movements and appeared to be a reversal of the morphologies observed during trap closure. However, comparison of changes in NCL of trap tissues during closure and reopening showed very little statistical correlation indicating that the tissue dynamics associated with trap closure were not simply reversed during reopening. Although the precise cell movements that provided driving force for trap morphological change were not delineated in this study, comparison of NCL data suggested that tissues in the trap lobe were alternately “active” and “quiescent” in temporally and regionally complex patterns. Changes in the NCL of analogous tissues on opposite sides of the mid-trap tissues within a trap region showed high positive correlation values, which indicated the possibility of coordinated activity in opposing tissues.     

Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration

Background and Aims

The carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) produces a rosette of leaves: each leaf is divided into a lower part called the lamina and an upper part, the trap, with sensory trigger hairs on the adaxial surface. The trap catches prey by very rapid closure, within a fraction of a second of the trigger hairs being touched twice. Generation of action potentials plays an important role in closure. Because electrical signals are involved in reduction of the photosynthetic rate in different plant species, we hypothesized that trap closure and subsequent movement of prey in the trap will result in transient downregulation of photosynthesis, thus representing the energetic costs of carnivory associated with an active trapping mechanism, which has not been previously described.

Methods

Traps were enclosed in a gas exchange cuvette and the trigger hairs irritated with thin wire, thus simulating insect capture and retention. Respiration rate was measured in darkness (R_D). In the light, net photosynthetic rate (A_N), stomatal conductance (g_s) and intercellular CO₂ concentration (c_i) were measured, combined with chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Responses were monitored in the lamina and trap separately.

Key Results

Irritation of trigger hairs resulted in decreased A_N and increased R_D, not only immediately after trap closure but also during the subsequent period when prey retention was simulated in the closed trap. Stomatal conductance remained stable, indicating no stomatal limitation of A_N, so c_i increased. At the same time, the effective quantum yield of photosystem II (Φ_PSII) decreased transiently. The response was confined mainly to the digestive zone of the trap and was not observed in the lamina. Stopping mechanical irritation resulted in recovery of A_N, R_D and Φ_PSII.

Conclusions

We put forward the first experimental evidence for energetic demands and carbon costs during insect trapping and retention in carnivorous plants, providing a new insight into the cost/benefit model of carnivory.     

Constitutive activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via cleft-spanning disulfide bonds

Although the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a critical role in the central nervous system, many questions remain regarding the relationship between its structure and functional properties. In particular, the involvement of ligand-binding domain closure in determining agonist efficacy, which has been reported in other glutamate receptor subtypes, remains unresolved. To address this question, we designed dual cysteine point mutations spanning the NR1 and NR2 ligand-binding clefts, aiming to stabilize these domains in closed cleft conformations. Two mutants, E522C/I691C in NR1 (EI) and K487C/N687C in NR2 (KN) were found to exhibit significant glycine- and glutamate-independent activation, respectively, and co-expression of the two subunits produced a constitutively active channel. However, both individual mutants could be activated above constitutive levels in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating that cleft closure does not completely prevent agonist association. Interestingly, whereas the NR2 KN disulfide was found to potentiate channel gating and M3 accessibility, NR1 EI exhibited the opposite phenotype, suggesting that the EI disulfide may trap the NR1 ligand-binding domain in a lower efficacy conformation. Furthermore, both mutants affected agonist sensitivity at the opposing subunit, suggesting that closed cleft stabilization may contribute to coupling between the subunits. These results support a correlation between cleft stability and receptor activation, providing compelling evidence for the Venus flytrap mechanism of glutamate receptor domain closure.