Novel role for RNase PH in the degradation of structured RNA

Escherichia coli contains multiple 3' to 5' RNases, of which two, RNase PH and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), use inorganic phosphate as a nucleophile to catalyze RNA cleavage. It is known that an absence of these two enzymes causes growth defects, but the basis for these defects has remained undefined. To further an understanding of the function of these enzymes, the degradation pattern of different cellular RNAs was analyzed. It was observed that an absence of both enzymes results in the appearance of novel mRNA degradation fragments. Such fragments were also observed in strains containing mutations in RNase R and PNPase, enzymes whose collective absence is known to cause an accumulation of structured RNA fragments. Additional experiments indicated that the growth defects of strains containing RNase R and PNPase mutations were exacerbated upon RNase PH removal. Taken together, these observations suggested that RNase PH could play a role in structured RNA degradation. Biochemical experiments with RNase PH demonstrated that this enzyme digests through RNA duplexes of moderate stability. In addition, mapping and sequence analysis of an mRNA degradation fragment that accumulates in the absence of the phosphorolytic enzymes revealed the presence of an extended stem-loop motif at the 3' end. Overall, these results indicate that RNase PH plays a novel role in the degradation of structured RNAs and provides a potential explanation for the growth defects caused by an absence of the phosphorolytic RNases.     

Different specificities of ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase in 3'mRNA decay.

We review recent evidence on the in vivo and in vitro mRNA degradation properties of 2 3'-exonucleases, ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase. Although secondary structures in the RNA can act as protective barriers against 3' exonucleolytic degradation, it appears that this effect depends on the stability of these structures. The fact that RNase II is more sensitive to RNA secondary structure than PNPase, could account for some differences observed in messenger degradation by the 2 enzymes in vivo. Terminator stem-loop structures are often very stable and 3' exonucleolytic degradation proceeds only after they have been eliminated by an endonucleolytic cleavage. Other secondary structures preceding terminator stem-loop seem to contribute to mRNA stability against exonucleolytic decay.     

Different specificities of ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase in 3'mRNA decay

We review recent evidence on the in vivo and in vitro mRNA degradation properties of 2 3'-exonucleases, ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase. Although secondary structures in the RNA can act as protective barriers against 3' exonucleolytic degradation, it appears that this effect depends on the stability of these structures. The fact that RNase II is more sensitive to RNA secondary structure than PNPase, could account for some differences observed in messenger degradation by the 2 enzymes in vivo. Terminator stem-loop structures are often very stable and 3' exonucleolytic degradation proceeds only after they have been eliminated by an endonucleolytic cleavage. Other secondary structures preceding terminator stem-loop seem to contribute to mRNA stability against exonucleolytic decay.     

The role of the S1 domain in exoribonucleolytic activity: substrate specificity and multimerization

RNase II is a 3'-5' exoribonuclease that processively hydrolyzes single-stranded RNA generating 5' mononucleotides. This enzyme contains a catalytic core that is surrounded by three RNA-binding domains. At its C terminus, there is a typical S1 domain that has been shown to be critical for RNA binding. The S1 domain is also present in the other major 3'-5' exoribonucleases from Escherichia coli: RNase R and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). In this report, we examined the involvement of the S1 domain in the different abilities of these three enzymes to overcome RNA secondary structures during degradation. Hybrid proteins were constructed by replacing the S1 domain of RNase II for the S1 from RNase R and PNPase, and their exonucleolytic activity and RNA-binding ability were examined. The results revealed that both the S1 domains of RNase R and PNPase are able to partially reverse the drop of RNA-binding ability and exonucleolytic activity resulting from removal of the S1 domain of RNase II. Moreover, the S1 domains investigated are not equivalent. Furthermore, we demonstrate that S1 is neither responsible for the ability to overcome secondary structures during RNA degradation, nor is it related to the size of the final product generated by each enzyme. In addition, we show that the S1 domain from PNPase is able to induce the trimerization of the RNaseII-PNP hybrid protein, indicating that this domain can have a role in the biogenesis of multimers.     

Different cleavage specificities of RNases III from Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli.

23S rRNA in Rhodobacter capsulatus shows endoribonuclease III (RNase III)-dependent fragmentation in vivo at a unique extra stem-loop extending from position 1271 to 1331. RNase III is a double strand (ds)-specific endoribonuclease. This substrate preference is mediated by a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) within the protein. Although a certain degree of double strandedness is a prerequisite, the question arises what structural features exactly make this extra stem-loop an RNase III cleavage site, distinguishing it from the plethora of stem-loops in 23S rRNA? We used RNase III purified from R.capsulatus and Escherichia coli, respectively, together with well known substrates for E.coli RNase III and RNA substrates derived from the special cleavage site in R.capsulatus 23S rRNA to study the interaction between the Rhodobacter enzyme and the fragmentation site. Although both enzymes are very similar in their amino acid sequence, they exhibit significant differences in binding and cleavage of these in vitro substrates.     

Kinetics of polynucleotide phosphorylase: comparison of enzymes from Streptomyces and Escherichia coli and effects of nucleoside diphosphates

We examined the activity of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) from Streptomyces coelicolor, Streptomyces antibioticus, and Escherichia coli in phosphorolysis using substrates derived from the rpsO-pnp operon of S. coelicolor. The Streptomyces and E. coli enzymes were both able to digest a substrate with a 3′ single-stranded tail although E. coli PNPase was more effective in digesting this substrate than were the Streptomyces enzymes. The k_cat for the E. coli enzyme was ca. twofold higher than that observed with the S. coelicolor enzyme. S. coelicolor PNPase was more effective than its E. coli counterpart in digesting a substrate possessing a 3′ stem-loop structure, and the K_m for the E. coli enzyme was ca. twice that of the S. coelicolor enzyme. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed an increased affinity of S. coelicolor PNPase for the substrate possessing a 3′ stem-loop structure compared with the E. coli enzyme. We observed an effect of nucleoside diphosphates on the activity of the S. coelicolor PNPase but not the E. coli enzyme. In the presence of a mixture of 20 μM ADP, CDP, GDP, and UDP, the K_m for the phosphorolysis of the substrate with the 3′ stem-loop was some fivefold lower than the value observed in the absence of nucleoside diphosphates. No effect of nucleoside diphosphates on the phosphorolytic activity of E. coli PNPase was observed. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an effect of nucleoside diphosphates, the normal substrates for polymerization by PNPase, on the phosphorolytic activity of that enzyme.     

Sok antisense RNA from plasmid R1 is functionally inactivated by RNase E and polyadenylated by poly(A) polymerase I

The hok/sok system of plasmid R1, which mediates plasmid stabilization by the killing of plasmid-free cells, codes for two RNA species, Sok antisense RNA and hok mRNA. Sok RNA, which is unstable, inhibits translation of the stable hok mRNA. The 64 nt Sok RNA folds into a single stem-loop domain with an 11 nt unstructured 5' domain. The initial recognition reaction between Sok RNA and hok mRNA takes place between the 5' domain and the complementary region in hok mRNA. In this communication we examine the metabolism of Sok antisense RNA. We find that RNase E cleaves the RNA 6 nt from its 5' end and that this cleavage initiates Sok RNA decay. The RNase E cleavage occurs in the part of Sok RNA that is responsible for the initial recognition of the target loop in hok mRNA and thus leads to functional inactivation of the antisense. The major RNase E cleavage product (denoted pSok_-6) is rapidly degraded by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). Thus, the RNase E cleavage tags pSok₋₆ for further rapid degradation by PNPase from its 3' end. We also show that Sok RNA is polyadenylated by poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), and that the poly(A)-tailing is prerequisite for the rapid 3'-exonucleolytic degradation by PNPase.     

Decay of the IS 10 antisense RNA by 3' exoribonucleases: evidence that RNase II stabilizes RNA-OUT against PNPase attack

RNA-OUT, the 69-nucleotide antisense RNA that regulates Tn 10/IS 10 transposition folds into a simple stem-loop structure. The unusually high metabolic stability of RNA-OUT is dependent, in part, on the integrity of its stem-domain: mutations that disrupt stem-domain structure (Class II mutations) render RNA-OUT unstable, and restoration of structure restores stability. Indeed, there is a strong correlation between the thermodynamic and metabolic stabilities of RNA-OUT. We show here that stem-domain integrity determines RNA-OUT's resistance to 3’exoribonucleolytic attack: Class II mutations are almost completely suppressed in Escherichia coli cells lacking its principal 3′ exoribonucleases, ribonuclease II (RNase II) and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). RNase II and PNPase are individually able to degrade various RNA-OUT species, albeit with different efficiencies: RNA-OUT secondary structure provides greater resistance to RNase II than to PNPase. Surprisingly, RNA-OUT is threefold more stable in wild-type cells than in cells deficient for RNase II activity, suggesting that RNase II somehow lessens RNPase attack on RNA-OUT. We discuss how this might occur. We also show that wild-type RNA-OUT stability changes only twofold across the normal range of physiological growth temperatures (30–44°C) in wild-type cells, which has important implications for IS 10 biology.     

tRNA 3' processing in plants: nuclear and mitochondrial activities differ

The nuclear tRNA 3' processing activity from wheat has been characterized and partially purified. Several characteristics of the wheat nuclear 3' processing enzyme now allow this activity to be distinguished from its mitochondrial counterpart. The nuclear enzyme is an endonuclease, which we termed nuclear RNase Z. The enzyme cleaves at the discriminator base and seems to consist only of protein subunits, since essential RNA subunits could not be detected. RNase Z leaves 5' terminal phosphoryl and 3' terminal hydroxyl groups at the processing products. It is a stable enzyme being active over broad temperature and pH ranges, with the highest activity at 35 degrees C and pH 8.4. The apparent molecular mass according to gel filtration chromatography is 122 kDa. The nuclear RNase Z does process 5' extended pretRNAs but with a much lower efficiency than 5' matured pretRNAs. Nuclear intron-containing precursor tRNAs as well as mitochondrial precursor tRNAs are efficiently cleaved by the nuclear RNase Z. Mitochondrial pretRNA(His) is processed by the nuclear RNase Z, generating a mature tRNA(His) containing an 8 base pair acceptor stem. The edited mitochondrial pretRNA(Phe) is cleaved easily, while the unedited version having a mismatch in the acceptor stem is not cleaved. Thus, an intact acceptor stem seems to be required for processing. Experiments with precursors containing mutated tRNAs showed that a completely intact anticodon arm is not necessary for processing by RNase Z. Comparison of the plant nuclear tRNA 3' processing enzyme with the plant mitochondrial one suggests that both activities are different enzymes.     

Escherichia coli poly(A)-binding proteins that interact with components of degradosomes or impede RNA decay mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase E

The multifunctional ribonuclease RNase E and the 3'-exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) are major components of an Escherichia coli ribonucleolytic "machine" that has been termed the RNA degradosome. Previous work has shown that poly(A) additions to the 3' ends of RNA substrates affect RNA degradation by both of these enzymes. To better understand the mechanism(s) by which poly(A) tails can modulate ribonuclease action, we used selective binding in 1 m salt to identify E. coli proteins that interact at high affinity with poly(A) tracts. We report here that CspE, a member of a family of RNA-binding "cold shock" proteins, and S1, an essential component of the 30 S ribosomal subunit, are poly(A)-binding proteins that interact functionally and physically, respectively, with degradosome ribonucleases. We show that purified CspE impedes poly(A)-mediated 3' to 5' exonucleolytic decay by PNPase by interfering with its digestion through the poly(A) tail and also inhibits both internal cleavage and poly(A) tail removal by RNase E. The ribosomal protein S1, which is known to interact with sequences at the 5' ends of mRNA molecules during the initiation of translation, can bind to both RNase E and PNPase, but in contrast to CspE, did not affect the ribonucleolytic actions of these enzymes. Our findings raise the prospect that E. coli proteins that bind to poly(A) tails may link the functions of degradosomes and ribosomes.     

RNA polyadenylation and degradation in cyanobacteria are similar to the chloroplast but different from Escherichia coli

The mechanism of RNA degradation in Escherichia coli involves endonucleolytic cleavage, polyadenylation of the cleavage product by poly(A) polymerase, and exonucleolytic degradation by the exoribonucleases, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase II. The poly(A) tails are homogenous, containing only adenosines in most of the growth conditions. In the chloroplast, however, the same enzyme, PNPase, polyadenylates and degrades the RNA molecule; there is no equivalent for the E. coli poly(A) polymerase enzyme. Because cyanobacteria is a prokaryote believed to be related to the evolutionary ancestor of the chloroplast, we asked whether the molecular mechanism of RNA polyadenylation in the Synechocystis PCC6803 cyanobacteria is similar to that in E. coli or the chloroplast. We found that RNA polyadenylation in Synechocystis is similar to that in the chloroplast but different from E. coli. No poly(A) polymerase enzyme exists, and polyadenylation is performed by PNPase, resulting in heterogeneous poly(A)-rich tails. These heterogeneous tails were found in the amino acid coding region, the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, as well as in rRNA and the single intron located at the tRNA(fmet). Furthermore, unlike E. coli, the inactivation of PNPase or RNase II genes caused lethality. Together, our results show that the RNA polyadenylation and degradation mechanisms in cyanobacteria and chloroplast are very similar to each other but different from E. coli.     

Mutational analysis of the primer RNA template region in the replication origin (oric) of bacteriophage G4: priming signal recognition by Escherichia coli primase

The primase-dependent phage G4 origin of complementary DNA strand synthesis (G4oric) contains three stable stem-loops (I, II, and III) upstream from the initiation point of primer RNA (pRNA). Site-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce alterations into the nucleotide (nt) sequence of the G4oric pRNA template region. Mutations in stem-loop I, that changed the length of the stem and the sequence of the loop, slightly depressed, but did not abolish, G4oric activity. However, functional G4oric activity was destroyed when the sequence containing the starting position of pRNA synthesis was deleted, or when insertions were introduced between the pRNA starting position (5'-CTG-3') and stem-loop I. Reintroducing a CTG as part of a PstI linker close to stem-loop I, however, resulted in recovery of G4oric functional activity. These results suggest that the specific nt sequence, containing 5'-CTG-3', between nt 3994 and 4007, and also the distance between the starting position of pRNA synthesis and stem-loop I, are essential structural features for G4oric function.