Ubiquitin-like protein Hub1 is required for pre-mRNA splicing and localization of an essential splicing factor in fission yeast

Hub1/Ubl5 is a member of the family of ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs). The tertiary structure of Hub1 is similar to that of ubiquitin; however, it differs from known modifiers in that there is no conserved glycine residue near the C terminus which, in ubiquitin and UBLs, is required for covalent modification of target proteins. Instead, there is a conserved dityrosine motif proximal to the terminal nonconserved amino acid. In S. cerevisiae, high molecular weight adducts can be formed in vivo from Hub1, but the structure of these adducts is not known, and they could be either covalent or noncovalent. The budding yeast HUB1 gene is not essential, but Delta hub1 mutants display defects in mating. Here, we report that fission yeast hub1 is an essential gene, whose loss results in cell cycle defects and inefficient pre-mRNA splicing. A screen for Hub1 interactors identified Snu66, a component of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP splicing complex. Furthermore, overexpression of Snu66 suppresses the lethality of a hub1ts mutant. In cells lacking functional hub1, the nuclear localization of Snu66 is disrupted, suggesting that an important role for Hub1 is the correct subcellular targeting of Snu66, although our data suggest that Hub1 is likely to perform other roles in splicing as well.     

Mechanistic studies on activation of ubiquitin and di-ubiquitin-like protein, FAT10, by ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 6, Uba6

Uba6 is a homolog of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme, Uba1, and activates two ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs), ubiquitin and FAT10. In this study, biochemical and biophysical experiments were performed to understand the mechanisms of how Uba6 recognizes two distinct UBLs and catalyzes their activation and transfer. Uba6 is shown to undergo a three-step activation process and form a ternary complex with both UBLs, similar to what has been observed for Uba1. The catalytic mechanism of Uba6 is further supported by inhibition studies using a mechanism-based E1 inhibitor, Compound 1, which forms covalent adducts with both ubiquitin and FAT10. In addition, pre-steady state kinetic analysis revealed that the rates of UBL-adenylate (step 1) and thioester (step 2) formation are similar between ubiquitin and FAT10. However, distinct kinetic behaviors were also observed for ubiquitin and FAT10. FAT10 binds Uba6 with much higher affinity than ubiquitin while demonstrating lower catalytic activity in both ATP-PP(i) exchange and E1-E2 transthiolation assays. Also, Compound 1 is less potent with FAT10 as the UBL compared with ubiquitin in ATP-PP(i) exchange assays, and both a slow rate of covalent adduct formation and weak adduct binding to Uba6 contribute to the diminished potency observed for FAT10. Together with expression level analysis in IM-9 cells, this study sheds light on the potential role of cytokine-induced FAT10 expression in regulating Uba6 pathways.     

SUMO protein modification

SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) family proteins are not only structurally but also mechanistically related to ubiquitin in that they are posttranslationally attached to other proteins. As ubiquitin, SUMO is covalently linked to its substrates via amide (isopeptide) bonds formed between its C-terminal glycine residue and the epsilon-amino group of internal lysine residues. The enzymes involved in the reversible conjugation of SUMO are similar to those mediating the ubiquitin conjugation. Since its discovery in 1996, SUMO has received a high degree of attention because of its intriguing and essential functions, and because its substrates include a variety of biomedically important proteins such as tumor suppressor p53, c-jun, PML and huntingtin. SUMO modification appears to play important roles in diverse processes such as chromosome segregation and cell division, DNA replication and repair, nuclear protein import, protein targeting to and formation of certain subnuclear structures, and the regulation of a variety of processes including the inflammatory response in mammals and the regulation of flowering time in plants.     

Specific and covalent targeting of conjugating and deconjugating enzymes of ubiquitin-like proteins

Modification of proteins by ubiquitin (Ub)-like proteins (UBLs) plays an important role in many cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, nuclear transport, and autophagy. Protein modification occurs via UBL-conjugating and -deconjugating enzymes, which presumably exert a regulatory function by determining the conjugation status of the substrate proteins. To target and identify UBL-modifying enzymes, we produced Nedd8, ISG15, and SUMO-1 in Escherichia coli and equipped them with a C-terminal electrophilic trap (vinyl sulfone [VS]) via an intein-based method. These C-terminally modified UBL probes reacted with purified UBL-activating (E1), -conjugating (E2), and -deconjugating enzymes in a covalent fashion. Modified UBLs were radioiodinated and incubated with cell lysates prepared from mouse cell lines and tissues to allow visualization of polypeptides reactive with individual UBL probes. The cell type- and tissue-specific labeling patterns observed for the UBL probes reflect distinct expression profiles of active enzymes, indicating tissue-specific functions of UBLs. We identify Ub C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and DEN1/NEDP1/SENP8, in addition to UCH-L3, as proteases with specificity for Nedd8. The Ub-specific protease isopeptidase T/USP5 is shown to react with ISG15-VS. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the desumoylation enzyme SuPr-1 can be modified by SUMO-1-VS, a modification that is dependent on the SuPr-1 active-site cysteine. The UBL probes described here will be valuable tools for the further characterization of the enzymatic pathways that govern modification by UBLs.     

Analysis of Small Ubiquitin-Like Modifier (SUMO) Targets Reflects the Essential Nature of Protein SUMOylation and Provides Insight to Elucidate the Role of SUMO in Plant Development

Posttranslational modification of proteins by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) has received much attention, reflected by a flood of recent studies implicating SUMO in a wide range of cellular and molecular activities, many of which are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Whereas most of these studies were performed in vitro or in single cells, plants provide an excellent system to study the role of SUMO at the developmental level. Consistent with its essential roles during plant development, mutations of the basic SUMOylation machinery in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cause embryo stage arrest or major developmental defects due to perturbation of the dynamics of target SUMOylation. Efforts to identify SUMO protein targets in Arabidopsis have been modest; however, recent success in identifying thousands of human SUMO targets using unique experimental designs can potentially help identify plant SUMO targets more efficiently. Here, known Arabidopsis SUMO targets are reevaluated, and potential approaches to dissect the roles of SUMO in plant development are discussed.Protein structure, and hence function, is determined not only by the primary amino acids sequence dictated by its gene sequence, but also by the many modifications they receive co- and posttranslationally. Some of these modifications involve chemical changes of amino acids (such as citrullination, deamidation, and racemization), whereas others involve structural changes in proteins (such as formation of disulfide bridges and the maturation of a precursor protein by proteotytic cleavage). Other modifications involve addition of functional groups, such as in the cases of acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, etc., or even sometimes other peptides. These modifications result in different topologies and activities of mature proteins and hence increase the repertoire of cellular proteins tremendously and provide a vast source of variation beyond that determined at the DNA or RNA levels. Many of these modifications are reversible, and their effects, albeit crucial for normal growth, development, and response to environmental cues, might be subtle, presenting challenges for studies attempting to correlate these modifications with phenotypes. One such posttranslational modification involves the covalent attachment (conjugation) of a family of small proteins to target proteins. Ubiquitin is the founding member of these small protein modifiers; however, a superfamily of more than 12 ubiquitin-like (UBL) proteins have been characterized and shown to regulate various aspects of cellular activity through modulation of protein structure and function (Hochstrasser, 2009; Vierstra, 2012). Although they share only low similarity at the primary amino acid sequence, these protein modifiers share a conserved three-dimensional structure as well as similar overall enzymatic reactions that lead to their conjugation and deconjugation to target proteins (Vierstra, 2012), suggesting that they probably have an ancient and common origin. Consistent with this idea, the bacterial proteins ThiS and MoaD, which act as sulfur donors during the synthesis of Thiamine and Molybdenum cofactor, are structurally related to ubiquitin, and the enzymes required for their activation (ThiF and MoeB, respectively) are related to the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1; Fig. 1; see discussion below; for review, see Hochstrasser, 2009). Recent evidence reveals that a simple, but complete, ubiquitin system is present in three extant archaeal groups and hence proposes a preeukaryotic origin of the UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). During the evolution of eukaryotes, this system expanded greatly to give rise to all known UBLs and their conjugation and deconjugation enzymes, including those for small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), and it is believed that all these modifications existed in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). The ancient origins of these protein modification systems may explain why many of the cellular processes they regulate are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Attachment of ubiquitin and SUMO, specifically, play crucial roles in eukaryotic growth and development, and these two UBLs are the most important and extensively studied of all small protein modifiers. Interestingly, the evolutionary routes that the UBL system followed, particularly those of ubiquitin and SUMO, seem to have involved different mechanisms during the evolution of plants and other eukaryotes from their common eukaryotic ancestor, pointing to potential differences specific to plants while conserving core molecular and cellular processes regulated by these UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015; N. Elrouby and S.R. Strickler, unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1. The SUMO conjugation and deconjugation system. SUMO is produced as a precursor protein with a C-terminal extension. SUMO proteases cleave off the C-terminal tail to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the C-terminal Gly. The SAE (or El) with its two subunits (SAE1 and SAE2) forms a thioester bond with this Gly residue to prepare for its transfer to the SCE (or E2). In addition to the thioester bond, the SCE binds SUMO noncovalently as well and eventually transfers SUMO to a target protein, usually with the aid of a third enzyme (E3), the SUMO ligase such as SIZ1. Targets, now covalently modified by SUMO through an isopeptide bond, perform specific functions, which are subsequently terminated by either removing SUMO from the target protein (deconjugation) or by regulated proteolysis. SUMO proteases with isopeptidase activity specifically and precisely hydrolyze the isopeptide bond, releasing free SUMO and target protein. Alternatively, a polySUMO chain forms through the activity of SUMO ligases (E4) such as PIAL1 and PIAL2, and this chain recruits STUbLs, which ubiquitinate both SUMO and the target protein and target them for degradation by the 26S proteasome. All gene models are derived from terminology in Arabidopsis. S, SUMO; Ub, ubiquitin; UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system.The enzymatic reactions that lead to the attachment of ubiquitin or SUMO to target proteins are very similar (Fig. 1). SUMO is produced as a precursor protein that contains two (in most SUMO isoforms) Gly residues near its C-terminal end (Novatchkova et al., 2004). A processing SUMO protease cleaves off the C-terminal end of the SUMO precursor to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the second Gly. Through an ATP-dependent pathway that involves three enzymatic activities (E1→E2→E3), the C-terminal end of mature SUMO eventually forms an isopeptide bond with the ε-amino group of a Lys residue in the target protein (Fig. 1; Dohmen, 2004). Target modification leads to a variety of effects (discussed below) that mainly regulate target protein activity, subcellular location, and interaction dynamics. However, unlike modification by ubiquitin (ubiquitination), which mainly leads to target degradation by a specialized multisubunit protease called the 26S proteasome, there is no evidence linking SUMOylation directly to target proteolysis (in some cases, modification of a protein by a polySUMO chain may lead to its ubiquitination, which itself targets the protein for degradation [see below]; Geiss-Friedlander and Melchior, 2007). Because most of our knowledge of the enzymology, structural biology, and functional implications of SUMOylation is derived from work performed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mammalian cell lines, this article updates our knowledge of the field in general, with emphasis on relevant data from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) whenever possible and a focus on SUMO protein targets. Plants provide an ideal model system to study the roles of SUMO during development, and hence knowledge gleaned from studies of yeast and human SUMO may provide guidelines that will help advance our understanding of the roles of SUMO in plant development.     

Characterization of the binding interface between ubiquitin and class I human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2b by multidimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy in solution.

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (Ubc) are involved in ubiquitination of proteins in the protein degradation pathway of eukaryotic cells. Ubc transfers the ubiquitin (Ub) molecules to target proteins by forming a thioester bond between their active site cysteine residue and the C-terminal glycine residue of ubiquitin. Here, we report on the NMR assignment and secondary structure of class I human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2b (HsUbc2b). Chemical shift perturbation studies allowed us to map the contact area and binding interface between ubiquitin and HsUbc2b by1H-15N HSQC NMR spectroscopy. The serine mutant of the active site Cys88 of HsUbc2b was employed to obtain a relatively stable covalent ubiquitin complex of HsUbc2b(C88S). Changes in chemical shifts of amide protons and nitrogen atoms induced by the formation of the covalent complex were measured by preparing two segmentally labeled complexes with either ubiquitin or HsUbc2b(C88S)15N-labeled. In ubiquitin, the interaction is primarily sensed by the C-terminal segment Val70 - Gly76, and residues Lys48 and Gln49. The surface area on ubiquitin, as defined by these residues, overlaps partially with the presumed binding site with ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). In HsUbc2b, most of the affected residues cluster in the vicinity of the active site, namely, around the active site Cys88 itself, the second alpha-helix, and the flexible loop which connects helices alpha2 and alpha3 and which is adjacent to the active site. An additional site on HsUbc2b for a weak interaction with ubiquitin could be detected in a titration study where the two proteins were not covalently linked. This site is located on the backside of HsUbc2b opposite to the active site and is part of the beta-sheet. The covalent and non-covalent interaction sites are clearly separated on the HsUbc2b surface, while no such clear-cut segregation of the interaction area was observed on ubiquitin.     

A protein conjugation system in yeast with homology to biosynthetic enzyme reaction of prokaryotes

Protein conjugation, such as ubiquitination, is the process by which the C-terminal glycine of a small modifier protein is covalently attached to target protein(s) through sequential reactions with an activating enzyme and conjugating enzymes. Here we report on a novel protein conjugation system in yeast. A newly identified ubiquitin related modifier, Urm1 is a 99-amino acid protein terminated with glycine-glycine. Urm1 is conjugated to target proteins, which requires the C-terminal glycine of Urm1. At the first step of this reaction, Urm1 forms a thioester with a novel E1-like protein, Uba4. Deltaurm1 and Deltauba4 cells showed a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype. Urm1 and Uba4 show similarity to prokaryotic proteins essential for molybdopterin and thiamin biosynthesis, although the Urm1 system is not involved in these pathways. This is the fifth conjugation system in yeast, following ubiquitin, Smt3, Rub1, and Apg12, but it is unique in respect to relation to prokaryotic enzyme systems. This fact may provide an important clue regarding evolution of protein conjugation systems in eukaryotic cells.     

Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-derived peptides as substrates for peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase

Ubiquitin (Ub) and the ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) mediate an array of cellular functions. These proteins contain a C-terminal glycine residue that is key to their function. Oxidative conversion of C-terminal glycine-extended prohormones to the corresponding alpha-amidated peptide is one step in the biosynthesis of bioactive peptide hormones. The enzyme catalyzing this reaction is peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase (PAM). We report herein that Ub is a PAM substrate with a (V/K)(amidation) that is similar to other known peptide substrates. This work is significant because PAM and the UBLs co-localize to the hypothalamus and the adrenal medulla and are both over-expressed in glioblastomas.     

Posttranslational modification of cellular proteins by a ubiquitin-like protein in bacteria

Posttranslational modification of proteins with ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins plays important regulatory roles in eukaryotes. Although a homologous conjugation system has recently been reported in Archaea, there is no similar report in Bacteria. This report describes the identification of a ubiquitin-like conjugation system in the bacterium Thermus thermophilus. A series of in vivo analyses revealed that TtuB, a bacterial ubiquitin-like protein that functions as a sulfur carrier in tRNA thiouridine synthesis, was covalently attached to target proteins, most likely via its C-terminal glycine. The involvement of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme-like protein TtuC in conjugate formation and the attachments of TtuB to TtuC and TtuA, which are proteins required for tRNA thiouridine synthesis, were demonstrated. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that lysine residues (Lys-137/Lys-226/Lys-229) of TtuA were covalently modified by the C-terminal carboxylate of TtuB. Intriguingly, a deletion mutant of a JAMM (JAB1/MPN/Mov34 metalloenzyme) ubiquitin isopeptidase homolog showed aberrant TtuB conjugates of TtuC and TtuA and an ～50% decrease in thiouridine amounts in tRNA. These results would support the hypothesis that thiouridine synthesis is regulated by TtuB-conjugation.     

Profiling the Cross Reactivity of Ubiquitin with the Nedd8 Activating Enzyme by Phage Display

The C-terminal peptides of ubiquitin (UB) and UB-like proteins (UBLs) play a key role in their recognition by the specific activating enzymes (E1s) to launch their transfer through the respective enzymatic cascades thus modifying cellular proteins. UB and Nedd8, a UBL regulating the activity of cullin-RING UB ligases, only differ by one residue at their C-termini; yet each has its specific E1 for the activation reaction. It has been reported recently that UAE can cross react with Nedd8 to enable its passage through the UB transfer cascade for protein neddylation. To elucidate differences in UB recognition by UAE and NAE, we carried out phage selection of a UB library with randomized C-terminal sequences based on the catalytic formation of UB∼NAE thioester conjugates. Our results confirmed the previous finding that residue 72 of UB plays a “gate-keeping” role in E1 selectivity. We also found that diverse sequences flanking residue 72 at the UB C-terminus can be accommodated by NAE for activation. Furthermore heptameric peptides derived from the C-terminal sequences of UB variants selected for NAE activation can function as mimics of Nedd8 to form thioester conjugates with NAE and the downstream E2 enzyme Ubc12 in the Nedd8 transfer cascade. Once the peptides are charged onto the cascade enzymes, the full-length Nedd8 protein is effectively blocked from passing through the cascade for the critical modification of cullin. We have thus identified a new class of inhibitors of protein neddylation based on the profiles of the UB C-terminal sequences recognized by NAE.     

Engineering in vivo instability of firefly luciferase and Escherichia coli β-glucuronidase in higher plants using recognition elements from the ubiquitin pathway

The ubiquitin pathway targets proteins for degradation through the post-translational covalent attachment of the 76 amino acid protein ubiquitin to -amino lysyl groups on substrate proteins. Two instability determinants recognized by the ubiquitin pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been identified. One is described by the N-end rule and requires specific destabilizing residues at the substrate protein N-termini along with a proximal lysyl residue for ubiquitin conjugation. The second is a linear uncleavable N-terminal ubiquitin moiety. The ability of these two determinants to function in higher plants was investigated in tobacco protoplast transient transfection assays using DNA encoding variants of well characterized reporter enzymes as substrates: firefly luciferase that is localized to peroxisomes (pxLUC), a cytosolic version of LUC (cLUC), and Escherichia coli -glucuronidase (GUS). cLUC with phenylalanine encoded at its mature N-terminus was 10-fold less abundant than cLUC with methionine at its mature N-terminus. GUS with phenylalanine encoded at its mature N-terminus was 3-fold less abundant than GUS with methionine at its mature N-terminus. The presence of a uncleavable N-terminal ubiquitin fusion resulted in 50-fold lower protein accumulation of cLUC, but had no effect on GUS. Both instability determinants had a much larger effect on cLUC than on pxLUC, suggesting that these degradation signals are either unrecognized or poorly recognized in the peroxisomes.     

Structural dissection of a gating mechanism preventing misactivation of ubiquitin by NEDD8's E1

Post-translational covalent modification by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) is a major eukaryotic mechanism for regulating protein function. In general, each UBL has its own E1 that serves as the entry point for a cascade. The E1 first binds the UBL and catalyzes adenylation of the UBL's C-terminus, prior to promoting UBL transfer to a downstream E2. Ubiquitin's Arg 72, which corresponds to Ala72 in the UBL NEDD8, is a key E1 selectivity determinant: swapping ubiquitin and NEDD8 residue 72 identity was shown previously to swap their E1 specificity. Correspondingly, Arg190 in the UBA3 subunit of NEDD8's heterodimeric E1 (the APPBP1-UBA3 complex), which corresponds to a Gln in ubiquitin's E1 UBA1, is a key UBL selectivity determinant. Here, we dissect this specificity with biochemical and X-ray crystallographic analysis of APPBP1-UBA3-NEDD8 complexes in which NEDD8's residue 72 and UBA3's residue 190 are substituted with different combinations of Ala, Arg, or Gln. APPBP1-UBA3's preference for NEDD8's Ala72 appears to be indirect, due to proper positioning of UBA3's Arg190. By contrast, our data are consistent with direct positive interactions between ubiquitin's Arg72 and an E1's Gln. However, APPBP1-UBA3's failure to interact with a UBL having Arg72 is not due to a lack of this favorable interaction, but rather arises from UBA3's Arg190 acting as a negative gate. Thus, parallel residues from different UBL pathways can utilize distinct mechanisms to dictate interaction selectivity, and specificity can be amplified by barriers that prevent binding to components of different conjugation cascades.     

Structural analysis of UBL5, a novel ubiquitin-like modifier

UBL5 is a widely expressed human protein that is strongly conserved across phylogeny. Orthologs of UBL5 occur in every eukaryotic genome characterized to date. The yeast ortholog of UBL5, HUB1, was reported to be a ubiquitin-like protein modifier important for modulation of protein function. However, unlike ubiquitin and all other ubiquitin-like modifiers, UBL5 and its yeast ortholog HUB1 both contain a C-terminal di-tyrosine motif followed by a single variable residue instead of the characteristic di-glycine found in all other ubiquitin-like modifiers. Here we describe the three-dimensional structure of UBL5 determined by NMR. The overall structure of the protein was found to be very similar to ubiquitin despite the low approximately 25% residue similarity. The signature C-terminal di-tyrosine residues in UBL5 are involved in the final beta sheet of the protein. This is very different to the di-glycine motif found in ubiquitin, which extends beyond the final beta sheet. In addition, we have confirmed an earlier report of an interaction between UBL5 and the cyclin-like kinase, CLK4, which we have determined is specific and does not extend to other cyclin-like kinase family members.     

Identification of the ubiquitin interfacial residues in a ubiquitin-E2 covalent complex

One of the key intermediates formed during the protein ubiquitination cycle is a covalent complex between ubiquitin (Ub) and the conjugation enzyme, UBC1. In order to probe the interface between these two proteins we have formed the covalent complex in situ (in the NMR tube) using Ub, the catalytic domain of UBC1, UBC1450, an activation enzyme, E1, and Mg²⁺-ATP. The size of the Ub-UBC1450 complex (25 kDa) and its relatively short lifetime ( 4 h) makes assignment of the backbone resonances in the covalent species difficult. In order to monitor the formation and identify the interface in the complex we have used fast ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectra to monitor the decay of ¹H-¹⁵N correlations as a function of time until the complex formed reached about 90%. The residual peak intensities were used to probe the surface of interaction between Ub and UBC1450 and provided a clear surface of interaction on Ub.     

Specific recognition of calmodulin from Dictyostelium discoideum by the ATP, ubiquitin-dependent degradative pathway

Calmodulin purified from Dictyostelium discoideum is selectively degraded by rabbit reticulocyte extracts in the presence of ubiquitin and ATP. This protein forms a 1:1 covalent conjugate with ubiquitin. Analyses of the cyanogen bromide fragments of the protein conjugate indicate that lysine 115 on calmodulin is the ubiquitin conjugation site. Bovine brain calmodulin which contains a trimethyllysine residue at this position is not a substrate for conjugation with ubiquitin, and its degradation rate is not affected by ATP and ubiquitin. These results suggest that the trimethyllysine residue in mammalian calmodulin may function in protecting the protein from degradation by the ATP, ubiquitin-dependent pathway. Since there are eight lysine residues in Dictyostelium calmodulin, the specific conjugation of ubiquitin to lysine 115 may provide a good model system to delineate the structural features required for the conjugation and to follow the degradative steps in the pathway.     

The sulfurtransferase activity of Uba4 presents a link between ubiquitin-like protein conjugation and activation of sulfur carrier proteins

Because of mechanistic parallels in the activation of ubiquitin and the biosynthesis of several sulfur-containing cofactors, we have characterized the human Urm1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Uba4 proteins, which are very similar in sequence to MOCS2A and MOCS3, respectively, two proteins essential for the biosynthesis of the molybdenum cofactor (Moco) in humans. Phylogenetic analyses of MOCS3 homologues showed that Uba4 is the MOCS3 homologue in yeast and thus the only remaining protein of the Moco biosynthetic pathway in this organism. Because of the high levels of sequence identity of human MOCS3 and yeast Uba4, we purified Uba4 and characterized the catalytic activity of the protein in detail. We demonstrate that the C-terminal domain of Uba4, like MOCS3, has rhodanese activity and is able to transfer the sulfur from thiosulfate to cyanide in vitro. In addition, we were able to copurify stable heterotetrameric complexes of Uba4 with both human Urm1 and MOCS2A. The N-terminal domain of Uba4 catalyzes the activation of either MOCS2A or Urm1 by formation of an acyl-adenylate bond. After adenylation, persulfurated Uba4 was able to form a thiocarboxylate group at the C-terminal glycine of either Urm1 or MOCS2A. The formation of a thioester intermediate between Uba4 and Urm1 or MOCS2A was not observed. The functional similarities between Uba4 and MOCS3 further demonstrate the evolutionary link between ATP-dependent protein conjugation and ATP-dependent cofactor sulfuration.     

Crystal structure of the ubiquitin-like protein YukD from Bacillus subtilis

The YukD protein in Bacillus subtilis was identified in a hidden Markov model (HMM) search as being related in sequence to ubiquitin. By solving the crystal structure we show that YukD adopts a fold that is most closely related to ubiquitin, yet has the shortest C-terminal tail of all known ubiquitin-like proteins. The endogenous gene of yukD in B. subtilis was disrupted without an obvious phenotypic effect and an inducible copy encoding a C-Myc and His-tagged version of the protein was introduced at the ectopic locus amyE. Conjugation assays performed both in vitro and in vivo indicate that YukD lacks the capacity for covalent bond formation with other proteins.     

Interaction of the tail with the catalytic region of a class II E2 conjugating enzyme

Ubiquitination plays an important role in many biological processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and protein degradation. In the latter pathway the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes or E2 enzymes are important proteins forming a key E2-ubiquitin thiolester prior to substrate labelling. While the structure of the 150-residue catalytic domain has been well characterized, a subset of E2 enzymes (class II) carry a variable length C-terminal `tail' where structural detail is not available. The presence of this C-terminal extension plays an important role in target recognition, ubiquitin chain assembly and oligomerization. In this work NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the secondary structure of the 215-residue yeast E2 protein Ubc1 and the interactions of its C-terminus with the catalytic domain. The C-terminal tail of Ubc1 was found to contain three -helices between residues D169-S176, K183-L193 and N203-L213 providing the first evidence for a well-defined secondary structure in this region. Chemical shift mapping indicated that residues in the L2 loop of the catalytic domain were most affected indicating the C-terminus of Ubc1 likely interacts with this region. This site of interaction is distinct from that observed in the E2-ubiquitin thiolester and may act to protect the catalytic C88 residue and direct the interaction of ubiquitin in the thiolester intermediate.