Evolutionary relationships amongst archaebacteria. A comparative study of 23 S ribosomal RNAs of a sulphur-dependent extreme thermophile, an extreme halophile and a thermophilic methanogen

The 23 S RNA genes representative of each of the main archaebacterial subkingdoms, Desulfurococcus mobilis an extreme thermophile, Halococcus morrhuae an extreme halophile and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum a thermophilic methanogen, were cloned and sequenced. The inferred RNA sequences were aligned with all the available 23 S-like RNAs of other archaebacteria, eubacteria/chloroplasts and the cytoplasm of eukaryotes. Universal secondary structural models containing six major structural domains were refined, and extended, using the sequence comparison approach. Much of the present structure was confirmed but six new helices were added, including one that also exists in the eukaryotic 5.8 S RNA, and extensions were made to several existing helices. The data throw doubt on whether the 5' and 3' ends of the 23 S RNA interact, since no stable helix can form in either the extreme thermophile or the methanogen RNA. A few secondary structural features, specific to the archaebacterial RNAs were identified; two of these were supported by a comparison of the archaebacterial RNA sequences, and experimentally, using chemical and ribonuclease probes. Seven tertiary structural interactions, common to all 23 S-like RNAs, were predicted within unpaired regions of the secondary structural model on the basis of co-variation of nucleotide pairs; two lie in the region of the 23 S RNA corresponding to 5.8 S RNA but they are not conserved in the latter. The flanking sequences of each of the RNAs could base-pair to form long RNA processing stems. They were not conserved in sequence but each exhibited a secondary structural feature that is common to all the archaebacterial stems for both 16 S and 23 S RNAs and constitutes a processing site. Kingdom-specific nucleotides have been identified that are associated with antibiotic binding sites at functional centres in 23 S-like RNAs: in the peptidyl transferase centre (erythromycin-domain V) the archaebacterial RNAs classify with the eukaryotic RNAs; at the elongation factor-dependent GTPase centre (thiostrepton-domain II) they fall with the eubacteria, and at the putative amino acyl tRNA site (alpha-sarcin-domain VI) they resemble eukaryotes. Two of the proposed tertiary interactions offer a structural explanation for how functional coupling of domains II and V occurs at the peptidyl transferase centre. Phylogenetic trees were constructed for the archaebacterial kingdom, and for the other two kingdoms, on the basis of the aligned 23 S-like RNA sequences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The nucleotide sequence of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene of the archaebacterium Halococcus morrhua.

The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from the archaebacterium Halococcus morrhua was determined by the dideoxynucleotide sequencing method. It is 1475 nucleotides long. This is the second archaebacterial sequence to be determined and it provides sequence comparison evidence for the secondary structural elements confined to the RNAs of this kingdom and, also, support for controversial or additional base pairing in the eubacterial RNAs. Six structural features are localized that have varied during the evolution of the archaebacteria, eubacteria and eukaryotes. Moreover, although the secondary structures of both sequenced archaebacterial RNAs strongly resemble those of eubacteria, they contain sufficient eukaryotic-like structural characteristics to reinforce the view that they belong to a separate line of evolutionary descent.     

Sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from the thermoacidophilic archaebacteriumSulfolobus solfataricus and its evolutionary implications

Summary The sequence of the small-subunit rRNA from the thermoacidophilic archaebacteriumSulfolobus solfataricus has been determined and compared with its counterparts from halophilic and methanogenic archaebacteria, eukaryotes, and eubacteria. TheS. solfataricus sequence is specifically related to those of the other archaebacteria, to the exclusion of the eukaryotic and eubacterial sequences, when examined either by evolutionary distance matrix analyses or by the criterion of minimum change (maximum parsimony). The archaebacterial 16S rRNA sequences all conform to a common secondary structure, with theS. solfataricus structure containing a higher proportion of canonical base pairs and fewer helical irregularities than the rRNAs from the mesophilic archaebacteria.S. solfataricus is unusual in that its 16S rRNA-23S rRNA intergenic spacer lacks a tRNA gene.     

The structure and evolution of archaebacterial ribosomal RNAs

A cladistic analysis of 553 5S rRNA sequences has revealed a Ur-5S rRNA, the ancestor of all present-day 5S rRNA molecules. Previously stated characteristic differences between the eubacterial and eukaryotic molecules, namely, the length base-pairing schemes of helices D, can be used as a marker for the various archaebacterial branches. One model comprises Thermococcus, Thermoplasma, methanobacteria, and halobacteria; a second comprises the Sulfolobales; and a third is represented only by the single organism Octopus Spring species 1. A relaxed selection pressure on helix E with subsequent deletions is observed in Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, and eubacteria. The secondary structures are supported by enzymatic digestion and chemical modification studies of the 5S rRNAs. Reconstitution of eubacterial 50S ribosomal subunits with 5S rRNA from Halobacterium and Thermoplasma has revealed 100% incorporation, while eukaryotic 5S rRNAs yielded a 50% incorporation. Relevant positions of the small-subunit rRNA are selected to answer the question of the monophyly of archaebacteria. Eight positions account for monophyly, eight for an ancestry of eubacteria with halophile methanogens and eukaryotes with eocytes (paraphyly of archaebacteria), and two for an ancestry of eubacteria with eocytes. A refinement of the neighborliness method of S. Sattath and A. Tversky resulted in a monophyly of archaebacteria when all positions are treated equally and in a paraphyly when tranversions are weighted twice over transitions.     

Molecular phylogenies based on ribosomal protein L11, L1, L10, and L12 sequences

Summary Available sequences that correspond to the E. coli ribosomal proteins L11, L1, L10, and L12 from eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes have been aligned. The alignments were analyzed qualitatively for shared structural features and for conservation of deletions or insertions. The alignments were further subjected to quantitative phylogenetic analysis, and the amino acid identity between selected pairs of sequences was calculated. In general, eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes each form coherent and well-resolved nonoverlapping phylogenetic domains. The degree of diversity of the four proteins between the three groups is not uniform. For L11, the eubacterial and archaebacterial proteins are very similar whereas the eukaryotic L11 is clearly less similar. In contrast, in the case of the L12 proteins and to a lesser extent the L10 proteins, the archaebacterial and eukaryotic proteins are similar whereas the eubacterial proteins are different. The eukaryotic L1 equivalent protein has yet to be identified. If the root of the universal tree is near or within the eubacterial domain, our ribosomal protein-based phylogenies indicate that archaebacteria are monophyletic. The eukaryotic lineage appears to originate either near or within the archaebacterial domain. Correspondence to: P. Dennis     

The use of protein synthesis inhibitors in the estimation of the contribution of halophilic archaebacteria to bacterial activity in hypersaline environments

Abstract Antibiotics affecting protein synthesis were used to differentiate between the activity of different groups of organisms (halophilic archaebacteria, eubacteria and eukaryotes) in water samples from hypersaline ecosystems. Anisomycin (inhibiting both archaebacterial halophiles and eukaryotes) can be used to quantitate the contribution of the archaebacterial halophiles to amino acid incorporation by the microbial community, when cycloheximide (inhibiting eukaryotic protein synthesis, but not affecting halobacteria) is used as a control. Both in saltern ponds at salinities above 300 g/1 and in Dead Sea surface water more than 95% of the amino acid incorporation activity was abolished by anisomycin, but not by cycloheximide. Inhibition by anisomycin was well correlated with inhibition by low concentrations of bile salts, which specifically affect bacteria of the Halobacterium group. Chloramphenicol (an inhibitor of eubacterial protein synthesis) quantitatively inhibited amino acid incorporation in saltern brines of relatively low salinity, but also caused significant (28–42%) inhibition at high salinities. Erythromycin was also found valuable in the estimation of activities of the different bacterial groups.     

Phylogenetic conservation of antigenic determinants in archaebacterial elongation factors (Tu proteins)

By using affinity chromatography methods, we have purified elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) proteins from a host of archaebacteria covering all known divisions in the archaebacterial tree except halophiles, and from such distantly related eubacteria as Thermotoga maritima and Escherichia coli. Polyclonal antibodies were raised against the Tu proteins of Sulfolobus solfataricus, Thermoproteus tenax, Thermococcus celer, Pyrococcus wosei, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Methanococcus thermolitotrophicus, Thermoplasma acidophilum, and Thermotoga and used to probe the immunochemical relatedness of elongation factors both within and across kingdom boundaries. A selection of the results, presented here, indicates that (i) every archaebacterial EF-Tu is closer (immunochemically) to every other archaebacterial EF-Tu than to the functionally analogous proteins of eubacteria and eukaryotes, with only one possible exception concerning the recognition of eukaryotic (EF-1 alpha) factors by Thermococcus EF-Tu antibodies, and (ii) within the archaebacteria there appears to be a correlation between EF-Tu immunochemical similarities and the phylogenetic relatedness of the organisms inferred from other (sequence) criteria. On the whole, immunochemical similarity data argue against the proposal that the archaebacterial taxon should be split and redistributed between two superkingdoms.     

Conservation of secondary structure in 5 S ribosomal RNA: a uniform model for eukaryotic, eubacterial, archaebacterial and organelle sequences is energetically favourable

The most commonly accepted secondary structure models for 5S RNA differ for molecules of eubacterial origin, where the four-helix model of Fox and Woese is generally cited, and those of eukaryotic origin, where a fifth helix is assumed to exist. We have carefully aligned all available sequences from eukaryotes, eubacteria, chloroplasts, archaebacteria and plant mitochondria. We could thus derive a unified secondary structure model applicable to all 5S RNA sequences known to-date. It contains the five helices already present in the eukaryotic model, extended by additional segments that were not previously assumed to be universally present. One of the helices can be written in two equilibrium forms, which could reflect the existence of a flexible, dynamic structure. For the derivation of the model and the estimation of the free energies we followed a set of rules optimized to predict the tRNA cloverleaf. The stability of the unified model is higher than that of nearly all previously proposed sequence-specific and general models.     

Cladistic analysis of 5S rRNA and 16S rRNA secondary and primary structure—The evolution of eukaryotes and their relation to archaebacteria

Summary The secondary structure of 5S rRNA has been elucidated by a cladistic analysis resulting in minimal models for eukaryotes, eubacteria, and halophilic-methanogenic archaebacteria, as well as for an ur-5S rRNA. This ancestor of all present-day 5S rRNA molecules is compared with an ur-tRNA and can be fitted into a tRNA-like structure allowing tertiary-structure interactions at the equivalent positions. A phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic 5SrRNA and 16S rRNA sequences confirms particular monophyletic taxa: rhodophytes (red algae), chlorobionts (green algae and plants), metazoans (multicellular animals), euglenozoans (euglenids and trypanosomatids), a group of zygomycetes (excluding Kickxellales), a group of ascomycetes (excluding Protomycetales), two distinct groups of basidiomycetes, and a group consisting of phaeophyceans (brown algae) and oomycetes (water molds). The Euglenozoa show a distinct relation to the Eumycota (true fungi) and Metazoa. An analysis of archaebacterial sequences substantiates the paraphyletic nature of this third urkingdom defining the eubacteria as a sister group of the halophile-methanogens and defining the eukaryotes as a sister group of a particular lineage of the eocytes/sulfur-dependents. The latter fact implies that even the eocytes/sulfur-dependent archaebacteria are paraphyletic.Presented at the FEBS Symposium on Genome Organization and Evolution, held in Crete, Greece, September 1–5, 1986Dedicated to the memory of Erik Huysmans who died on July 8, 1986, at the age of 29.     

Generalized structures of the 5S ribosomal RNAs.

The sequences of 5S ribosomal RNAs from a wide-range of organisms have been compared. All sequences fit a generalized 5S RNA secondary structural model. Twenty-three nucleotide positions are found universally, i.e., in 5S RNAs of eukaryotes, prokaryotes, archaebacteria, chloroplasts and mitochondria. One major distinguishing feature between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic 5S RNAs is the number of nucleotide positions between certain universal positions, e.g., prokaryotic 5S RNAs have three positions between the universal positions PuU40 and G44 (using the E. coli numbering system) and eukaryotic 5S RNAs have two. The archaebacterial 5S RNAs appear to resemble the eukaryotic 5S RNAs to varying degrees depending on the species of archaebacteria although all the RNAs conform with the prokaryotic "rule" of chain length between PuU40 and G44. The green plant chloroplast and wheat mitochondrial 5S RNAs appear prokaryotic-like when comparing the number of positions between universal nucleotides. Nucleotide positions common to eukaryotic 5S RNAs have been mapped; in addition, nucleotide sequences, helix lengths and looped-out residues specific to phyla are proposed. Several of the common nucleotides found in the 5S RNAs of metazoan somatic tissue differ in the 5S RNAs of oocytes. These changes may indicate an important functional role of the 5S RNA during oocyte maturation.     

Immunological comparison of ribosomal proteins from archaebacteria.

Antisera were raised in rabbits against ribosomal proteins of Methanobacterium bryantii and used to analyze immunological relationships to ribosomes from other archaebacteria, from eubacteria, and from yeasts. Cross-reaction could be detected within the methanogens and with a member of the extreme halophiles; the degree of immunological similarity reflected the relationship delineated by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid oligonucleotide analysis (Fox et al., Science 209:457-463, 1980). With the methods and the anti-total-protein sera employed, there was no detectable cross-reaction with ribosomal proteins or ribosomes from Sulfolobus sp., eubacteria, or yeast.     

Taxonomic relations between archaebacteria including 6 novel genera examined by cross hybridization of DNAs and 16S rRNAs

DNAs from 16 species of archaebacteria including 6 novel isolates were hybridized with 16S rRNAs from 7 species representing different orders or groups of the urkingdom of archaebacteria. The yields, normalized for the number of genes per microgram of DNA, and the temperature stabilities of all hybrids were determined and related to each other. A taxonomic tree constructed from such fractional stability data reveals the same major divisions as that derived from comparative cataloging of 16S rRNA sequences. The extreme halophiles appear however as a distinct order besides the three known divisions of methanogens. The methanogens, the halophiles and Thermoplasma form one of two clearly recognizable branches of the archaebacterial urkingdom. The order represented by Sulfolobus and the related novel order Thermoproteales form the other branch. Three novel genera, Thermoproteus, Desulfurococcus and the "stiff filaments" represent three families of this order. The extremely thermophilic methanogen Methanothermus fervidus belongs to the Methanobacteriales. SN1, a methanogen from Italy, appears as another species of the genus Methanococcus. Another novel methanogen, M3, represents a genus or family of the order Methanomicrobiales.     

Energy metabolism of a thermoacidophilic archaebacterium,Sulfolobus acidocaldarius

To elucidate the phylogenic status of the archaebacterium and mechanisms of acidophily, membrane bound ATPase, cytochromes and NADH dehydrogenase of a thermoacidophilic archaebacterium,Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, were studied. Typea cytochrome was found in the membrane. The organism was sensitive to cyanide and azide, and though cytochromec is lacking in this organism, these respiratory poisons inhibited a terminal oxidase, when assayed with cytochromec from other sources. NADH dehydrogenase was highly purified from the crude extract of the cells. The enzyme was able to transfer electrons from NADH to caldariellaquinone, a unique benzothiophenequinone in the genusSulfolobus. Thus, the enzyme is a possible member of the respiratory chain. Membrane fraction contained two types of ATPase, one was active at neutral pH and slightly activated by sulfate; the other was an acid apyrase and inhibited by sulfate. Typical characteristics of F₀F₁ATPase could not be found in these enzymes. These results suggest that (1) the thermoacidophilic archaebacteria are phylogenically distant from both eubacteria and eukaryotes, (2) the archaebacterial thermoacidophiles can be classified in a different subgroup from methanogens and extreme halophiles, and (3) in spite of the aerobic nature of the organism, the energy yielding mechanisms appear quite unique, when compared to those of other aerobes and mitochondria.     

Origin and early evolution of eukaryotes inferred from the amino acid sequences of translation elongation factors 1α/Tu and 2/G

Phylogenetic placements of archaebacteria and protozoa are important in understanding the origin and early evolution of eukaryotes. These problems have been analyzed mainly by comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SrRNA) sequences. However, the SrRNA phylogeny may sometimes be unreliable, especially when base compositions are biased among species. Because it is difficult to take full account of the bias in inferring the SrRNA tree, alternative examinations using protein sequence data have been very much desired. We analyzed the phylogenetic relationship among eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and eubacteria by the ML method of protein phylogeny using amino acid sequence data of EF-1α/Tu and 2/G. The unrooted tree analyses of both the EF-1α/Tu and 2/G consistently demonstrated that the ‘eocyte’ tree, in which archaebacteria are not monophyletic but eocytes are closer to eukaryotes than to other archaebacteria, is very likely. Further analysis using a composite tree of EF-1α/Tu and 2/G suggested that archaebacteria are closer to eukaryotes than to eubacteria but are not monophyletic. These results clearly support the hypothesis that eukaryotes have evolved from the eocyte-like organism. We also analyzed a protozoan phylogeny including mitochondrion-lacking species by the ML method using EF-1α and EF-2 data sets, and demonstrated (a) that two mitochondrion-lacking species, G. plecoglossi (Microsporidians) and G. lamblia (Diplomonads) probably represent the first and the second earliest offshoots of eukaryotes, respectively; (b) that Trypanosoma is not likely to have diverged next to Giardia as suggested by the SrRNA tree, but shows high affinity with higher eukaryotes; and (c) that protein phylogeny would give a robust estimation because amino acid compositions of conservative proteins do not differ significantly among species.     

Intralineage diversity of archaebacterial ribosomes: A dichotomy of ribosome features separates sulfur-dependent archaebacteria and methanococcaceae from other archaebacterial taxa

Summary The aggregate masses and relative protein contents of eubacterial and archaebacterial ribosomes have been estimated from the buoyant densities of the ribosomal subunits and the anhydrous weights of the rRNA species. In contrast to the situation in eubacteria, archaebacterial ribosomes fall into two size classes that differ only in the relative abundances of their protein moieties. One class comprises eubacterial-sized particles (2.3-megadalton (Mdal) monomer; 1.5-Mdal and 0.8-Mdal large and small subunits, respectively) having a eubacterial composition of roughly one-third protein and two-thirds RNA. The other class comprises ribosomes heavier than those of eubacteria (3-Mdal monomer; 1.8-Mdal and 1.2-Mdal subunits) and having the same protein/RNA ratio as eukaryotic ribosomes (55% and 50% protein for the small and large subunits, respectively). Eubacterialsized ribosomes are harbored by extreme halophiles and all methanogens but the Methanococcaceae. Ribosomes heavier than those of eubacteria are found in the Methanococcaceae and all sulfur-dependent thermophiles. The data indicate that a change in ribosome structure occurred within the methanogen branch; therefore, although ribosome composition is distributed in archaebacteria, its distribution does not break them into two separate kingdoms: The Methanococcaceae and Methanobacteriaceae are related to each other far more closely than either is to the sulfur-dependent thermophiles, and the root of the archaebacterial tree definitely does not lie betweenMethanobacterium andMethanococcus. We surmise that ribosomes larger than those of eubacteria represent a more rudimentary organelle structure that became fixed owing to nonparallel evolution of the translational machinery in archaebacteria.     

The number, physical organization and transcription of ribosomal RNA cistrons in an archaebacterium: Halobacterium halobium.

Because it is now clear that archaebacteria may be as distinct from eubacteria as either group is from eukaryotic cells, and because a specifically archaebacterial ancestry has been proposed for the nuclear-cytoplasmic component of eukaryotic cells, we undertook to characterize, for the first time, the ribosomal RNA cistrons of an archaebacterium (Halobacterium halobium). We found these cistrons to be physically linked in the order 16S-23S-5S, and obtained evidence that they are also transcribed from a common promoter(s) in the order 5'-16S-23S-5S-3'. We showed that, although slightly larger immediate precursors of 16S and 23S are readily seen, no common precursor of both 16S and 23S can be easily detected in vivo. In all these respects the archaebacterium H. halobium is like a eubacterium and unlike the nuclear-cytoplasmic component of eukaryotic cells. We found, however, that it differs from eubacteria of comparable (large) genome size in having only one copy of the rRNA gene cluster per genome.