Mode of action of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Evidence that the inhibitor competes with plastoquinone for binding to a common site on the acceptor side of Photosystem II

The kinetics and concentration dependence of the binding of dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU) to Photosystem II (PS II) were monitored through fluorescence measurements. According to whether the acceptor system is in the ‘odd’ state (QB⁻ ag Q⁻B) or ‘even’ state (QB), very different results are obtained. The binding to centers in the even state is rapid ( at [DCMU] = 10⁻⁵ M and [chlorophyll] = 10 μg/ml), with a pH-independent rate. The concentration curve of the bound inhibitor (at equilibrium) corresponds to an association constant of about 3.3·10⁷ M⁻¹·1. The binding of the inhibitor to centers in the odd state is slow ( at pH 7, same DCMU and chlorophyll concentrations as above), and depends on pH. In the pH range 6–8, the lower the pH, the slower the kinetics. The association constant is also diminished by a factor of approx. 20 (at pH 7) compared to the even state centers. It is shown that these effects are in good agreement with predictions from Velthuys' hypothesis (Velthuys, B.R. (1981) FEBS Lett. 126, 277–281) that the mode of action of DCMU is a competition with plastoquinone for the binding to the secondary acceptor site. A large part of PS II photochemical quenching corresponds to acceptors which seem to possess a secondary acceptor distinct from B. They were called ‘non-B-type acceptors’ (Lavergne, J. (1982) Photobiochem. Photobiophys. 3, 257–285) and may be identified with Joliot's ‘Q₂’ (Joliot P. and Joliot, A. (1977) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 462, 559–574). However, the rate at which the inhibition affects these non-B-type acceptors is similar to the rate of DCMU binding on the B site (i.e., slow in the odd state, fast in the even state).     

Charge accumulation and recombination in Photosystem II studied by thermoluminescence. I. Participation of the primary acceptor Q and secondary acceptor B in the generation of thermoluminescence of chloroplasts

In the glow curves of chloroplasts excited by a series of flashes at +1°C the intensity of the main thermoluminescence band appearing at +30°C (B band; B, secondary acceptor of Photosystem II) exhibits a period-4 oscillation with maxima on the 2nd and 6th flashes indicating the participation of the S₃ state of the water-splitting system in the radiative charge recombination reaction. After long-term dark adaptation of chloroplasts (6 h), when the major part of the secondary acceptor pool (B pool) is oxidized, a period-2 contribution with maxima occurring at uneven flash numbers appears in the oscillation pattern. The B band can even be excited at ?160°C as well as by a single flash in which case the water-splitting system undergoes only one transition (S₁ → S₂). The experimental observations and computer simulation of the oscillatory patterns suggest that the B band originates from charge recombination of the S₂B^? and S₃B^? redox states. The half-time of charge recombination responsible for the B band is 48 s. When a major part of the plastoquinone pool is reduced due to prolonged excitation of the chloroplasts by continuous light, a second band (Q band; Q, primary acceptor of Photosystem II) appears in the glow curve at +10°C which overlaps with the B band. In chloroplasts excited by flashes prior to DCMU addition only the Q band can be observed showing maxima in the oscillation pattern at flash numbers 2, 6 and 10. The Q band can also be induced by flashes after DCMU addition which allows only one transition of the water-splitting system (S₁ → S₂). In the presence of DCMU, electrons accumulate on the primary acceptor Q, thus the Q band can be ascribed to the charge recombination of either the S₂Q^? or S₃Q^? states depending on whether the water-splitting system is in the S₂ or the S₃ state. The half-time of the back reaction of Q^? with the donor side of PS II (S₂ or S₃ states) is 3 s. It was also observed that in a sequence of flashes the peak positions of the Q and B bands do not depend on the advancement of the water-splitting system from the S₂ state to the S₃ state. This result implies that the midpoint potential of the water-splitting system remains unmodified during the S₂ → S₃ transition.     

Interaction of exogenous benzoquinone with Photosystem II in chloroplasts. The semiquinone form acts as a dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive secondary acceptor

Chloroplasts were submitted to a sequence of saturating short flashes and then rapidly mixed with dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU). The amount of singly reduced secondary acceptor (B^?) present was estimated from the DCMU-induced increase in fluorescence in the dark caused by the reaction: QB^?

Q^?B. By varying the time interval between the preillumination and the mixing, the time course of B^? reoxidation by externally added benzoquinone was investigated. It was found that benzoquinone oxidizes B^? in a bimolecular reaction, and does not interact directly with Q^?. When a sufficient delay after the preillumination was allowed in order to let benzoquinone reoxidize B^? before the injection of DCMU, the fluorescence increase caused by one subsequent flash fired in the presence of DCMU was followed by a fast decay phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 100 μ}\text{s}$). The amplitude of this phase was proportional to the amount of B^? produced by the preillumination. This fast decay was observed only after the first flash in the presence of DCMU. These results are interpreted by assuming a binding of the singly reduced benzoquinone to Photosystem II where it acts as an efficient, DCMU-insensitive, secondary (exogenous) acceptor.     

Determination and modification of the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II in the dark

The redox state of the secondary electron acceptor B of Photosystem II was studied using fluorescence measurements. Preillumination of algae or chloroplasts with a variable number of short saturating flashes followed rapidly by the addition of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea induces oscillations of the initial level of fluorescence. The phase of these oscillations is characteristic of a given $\text{B}\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio in the dark-adapted samples.We conclude from our results that about 50% of the secondary electron acceptors are singly reduced in the dark in Chlorella cells, but that more than 70% are fully oxidized in the dark adapted chloroplasts.Benzoquinone treatment modifies this distribution in Chlorella leading to the same situation as in chloroplasts, i.e. more than 70% of the secondary acceptors are oxidized in the dark.The same ratio is observed if these algae are illuminated and then dark-adapted, unless an artificial donor (hydroxylamine) is added before this illumination. In that case about 50% B^? is generated and stabilized in the dark.     

Optical characterization of Photosystem II electron donors

Detailed absorbance difference spectra are reported for the Photosystem II acceptor Q, the secondary donor Z, and the donor involved in photosynthetic oxygen evolution which we call M. The spectra of Z and Q could be resolved by analysis of flash-induced kinetics of prompt and delayed fluorescence, EPR signal II_f and absorbance changes in Tris-washed system II preparations in the presence of ferricyanide and 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU). The spectrum of Z oxidation consists mainly of positive bands at 260, 300 and 390–450 nm on which a chlorophyll a band shift around 438 nm is superimposed, and is largely pH-independent as is also the case for the spectrum of Q reduction. The re-reduction of Z⁺ occurred in the millisecond time range, and could be explained by a competition between back reaction with Q^? (120 ms at pH 6.0) and reduction by ferrocyanide. When the Tris treatment is omitted the preparations evolve oxygen, and the photoreduction of Q (with DCMU present) is accompanied by the oxidation of M. The Q spectrum being known, the spectrum of the oxidation of M could be determined as well. It consists of a broad, asymmetric increase peaking near 305 nm and of a Chl a band shift, which is about the same as that accompanying Z in Tris-washed system II. Comparison with spectra of model compounds suggests that Z is a bound plastoquinol which is oxidized to the semiquinone cation and that the oxidation of M is an Mn(III) → Mn(IV) transition.     

The rapid component of electron paramagnetic resonance signal II: A candidate for the physiological donor to Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts

Rapid light-induced transients in EPR Signal IIf (F^?+) are observed in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated, Tris-washed chloroplasts until the state F P680 Q^? is reached. In the absence of exogenous redox mediators several flashes are required to saturate this photoinactive state. However, the Signal IIf transient is observed on only the first flash following DCMU addition if an efficient donor to Signal IIf, phenylenediamine or hydroquinone, is present. Complementary polarographic measurements show that under these conditions oxidized phenylenediamine is produced only on the first flash of a series. The DCMU inhibition of Signal IIf can be completely relieved by oxidative titration of a one-electron reductant with E′_08.0 = +480 mV. At high reduction potentials the decay time of Signal IIf is constant at about 300 ms, whereas in the absence of DCMU the decay time is longer and increases with increasing reduction potential.A model is proposed in which Q^?, the reduced Photosystem II primary acceptor, and D, a one-electron 480 mV donor endogenous to the chloroplast suspension, compete in the reduction of Signal IIf (F^?+). At high potentials D is oxidized in the dark, and the (Q^? + F^?+) back reaction regenerates the photoactive F P680 Q state. The electrochemical and kinetic evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the Signal IIf species, F, is identical with Z, the physiological donor to P680.     

Site of bicarbonate effect in Hill reaction. Evidence from the use of artificial electron acceptors and donors

Using artificial electron donors and acceptors, it is shown here that the major HCO₃^? effect in the Hill reaction is after the “primary” electron acceptor (Q) of Photosystem II and before the site of action of 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone (at the plastoquinone pool). Chloroplasts in the presence of both 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, which blocks electron flow from the reduced primary acceptor Q^? to the plastoquinone pool, and silicomolybdate, which accepts electrons from Q^?, show no significant bicarbonate stimulation of electron flow. However, a 6–7-fold stimulation is clearly observed when oxidized diaminodurene, as an electron acceptor, and dibromothymoquinone, as an inhibitor of electron flow beyond the plastoquinone pool, are used. In the same chloroplast preparation no measurable effect of bicarbonate is observed in a Photosystem I reaction as monitored by electron flow from reduced diaminodurene to methyl viologen in the presence of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The insensitivity of the bicarbonate effect to uncouplers of photophosphorylation and the dependence of this effect on the presence of a weak acid anion and on external pH are also reported.     

New results on the properties of photosystem II centers blocked by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in their different photoactive states

We have studied the 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) action on the different S states by oxygen, fluorescence and luminescence measurements.We show that no oxygen is evolved during a flash following the addition of DCMU to centers in their S₃ state. This suggests that oxygen inhibition cannot be attributed solely to a blocking between Q and A. For all the photoinactive states, the only remaining pathway for the quencher reoxidation, in the presence of DCMU, appears to proceed through a back reaction. Therefore, the complete quencher regeneration still occurring when the fourth positive charge is formed in the presence of DCMU is also an indication of an action by DCMU at the donor side.The data well fit the model in which the oscillations of the fluorescence yield and their damping are attributed to a fast equilibrium between two forms of the centers: a photoactive and a photoinactive form, both of which are quenchers. The equilibrium constant depends on the number of positive charges stored and DCMU changes the characteristics of this equilibrium.     

Inactivation of photosynthetic oxygen evolution by UV-B irradiation: A thermoluminescence study

The influence of UV-B irradiation on photosynthetic oxygen evolution by isolated spinach thylakoids has been investigated using thermoluminescence measurements. The thermoluminescence bands arising from the S₂Q_B ^- (B band) and S₂Q_A ^– (Q band) charge recombination disappeared with increasing UV-B irradiation time. In contrast, the C band at 50°C, arising from the recombination of Q_A ^- with an accessory donor of Photosystem II, was transiently enhanced by the UV-B irradiation. The efficiency of DCMU to block Q_A to Q_B electron transfer decreased after irradiation as detected by the incomplete suppression of the B band by DCMU. The flash-induced oscillatory pattern of the B band was modified in the UV-B irradiated samples, indicating a decrease in the number of centers with reduced Q_B. Based on the results of this study, UV-B irradiation is suggested to damage both the donor and acceptor sides of Photosystem II. The damage of the water-oxidizing complex does not affect a specific S-state transition. Instead, charge stabilization is enhanced on an accessory donor. The acceptor-side modifications decrease the affinity of DCMU binding. This effect is assumed to reflect a structural change in the Q_B/DCMU binding site. The preferential loss of dark stable Q_B ^- may be related to the same structural change or could be caused by the specific destruction of reduced quinones by the UV-B light.Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - DCMU 3-(3,4,-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - PS II Photosystem II - Q_A first quinone electron acceptor of PS II - Q_B second quinone electron acceptor of PS II - Tyr-D accessory electron donor of PS II - S₀-S₄ charge storage states of the water-oxidizing complex     

On the function of the fluorescence quenchers in chloroplasts and their relation to the primary electron acceptor of photosystem II.

Redox titrations of the fluorescence quenching components in chloroplasts indicate the presence of two components, one with E_m7.6 = + 25 mV and the second with E_m7.6 = -270 mV. These midpoint potentials are almost the same as those of two Photosystem II components previously shown to contribute to the chloroplast electrogenic reaction measured at 518 nm (R. Malkin, 1978, FEBS Lett.87, 329–333). Comparison of light-induced fluorescence yield changes with those obtained by redox titration suggests that both fluorescence quenchers are photoreduced. A direct demonstration of the photoreduction of the low-potential fluorescence quencher was observed in experiments at defined redox potentials. Fluorescence induction curves measured at low light intensity in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) also showed a contribution from both fluorescence quenchers. An additional electron acceptor, other than the two fluorescence quenchers, was also identified in the acceptor complex. These results are discussed in terms of several electron acceptors functioning in the Photosystem II reaction center complex, and the possible function of these acceptors is considered.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Modulation of herbicide-binding by the redox state of Q400, an endogenous component of Photosystem II

Preincubation of isolated chloroplasts with ferricyanide, prior to addition of DCMU, unmasks a high-potential electron acceptor (Q₄₀₀) in Photosystem II that acts as an additional quencher and prolongs the fluorescence induction curve in the presence of DCMU (Ikegami, I. and Katoh, S. (1973) Plant Cell Physiol. 14, 829–836). This study confirms that Q₄₀₀ is endogenous to Photosystem II and is not a bound ferricyanide, and several new characteristics of this high potential acceptor are established. (a) It is accessible to ferricyanide even in the presence of DCMU. The rate of oxidation, however, is very slow, consistent with access only via Q_A. Accessibility may be enhanced by magnesium, reminiscent of the oxidation of Q⁻_A by ferricyanide. (b) Oxidation of Q₄₀₀ drastically suppresses the binding of DCMU at neutral and alkaline pH. Below pH 6, however, DCMU binding is essentially normal. The pH dependence of DCMU binding is consistent with the known pH dependence of the redox midpoint potential of Q₄₀₀. (c) Binding of many other inhibitors of Q_A-to-Q_B electron transfer is much less affected or even completely unaffected. These results have implications for current notions of herbicide binding and may also bear on the origin of slow phases of fluorescence induction in the presence of DCMU.     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II I. Redox titration of the flash-induced carotenoid band shift,of C550 and of the variable fluorescence yield in spinach chloroplasts

Redox titration of the electrochromic carotenoid band shift, detected at 50 μs after a saturating actinic flash, in spinach chloroplasts, shows that only one electron acceptor in Photosystem II participates in a transmembrane primary electron transfer. This species, the primary quinone acceptor, Q, shows only one midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) of approx. 0 V and is undoubtedly equivalent to the fluorescence quencher, Q_H. A second titration wave is observed at low potential ($\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext><mtext>,7.5</mtext>}}\text{? ? 240}\text{mV}$) and at greater than 3 ms after a saturating actinic flash. This wave has an action spectrum different from that of Photosystem II centers containing Q and could arise from a secondary but not primary electron transfer. A low-potential fluorescence quencher is observed in chloroplasts which largely disappears in a single saturating flash at ? 185 mV and which does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This low-potential quencher (probably equivalent to fluorescence quencher, Q_L) and Q are altogether different species. Redox titration of C550 shows that if electron acceptor Q_β is indeed characterized by an E_m,7 of + 120 mV, then this acceptor does not give rise to a C550 signal upon reduction and does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This titration also shows that C550 is not associated with Q_L.     

Energy transfer and quantum yield in Photosystem II

The photoreduction and dark reoxidation of Q_α and Q_β, the primary electron acceptors of Photosystems (PS) IIα and IIβ, respectively, in the presence of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) were studied in tobacco chloroplasts by means of fluorescence and absorbance measurements. The magnitude of a correction for an absorbance change by the oxidizing side of PS II needed in our previous study of the quantum yield of Q reduction (Biochim. Biophys. Acta 635 (1981), 111–120) has been determined. The absorbance change occurs in PS IIα mainly. The maximum fluorescence yield was found to be the same as in the mutant Su/su, which has a 3-fold higher reaction center concentration and a lower PS IIα to PS IIβ ratio. The kinetics of the light-induced fluorescence increase were measured after various pretreatments and the corresponding kinetics of the integrated fluorescence deficit were analyzed into their α and β components. From the results the contribution to the minimum fluorescence level, the degree of energy transfer between units, and the quantum efficiency of Q reduction were calculated for both types of PS II. This led to the following conclusions. The absence of energy between PS IIβ antennae is confirmed. Fluorescence quenching in PS IIα was adequately described by the matrix model, except for a decrease in the energy transfer between units during photoreduction of Q_α, possibly due to the formation of ‘islets’ of closed centers. PS II reaction centers in which Q is reduced do not significantly quench fluorescence. The ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, 0.77 in PS IIα and 0.92 in PS IIβ, multiplied by the fraction of Q remaining in the reduced state after one saturating flash, 0.88 in PS IIα and greater than 0.95 in PS IIβ, leads to a net quantum efficiency of Q reduction in the presence of DCMU and NH₂OH of 0.68 in PS IIα and about 0.90 in PS IIβ. These values are in good agreement with the measured overall quantum efficiency of Q reduction.     

Redox titration of electron acceptor Q and the plastoquinone pool in Photosystem II

The primary photochemical quencher Q and the secondary electron acceptor pool in Photosystem II have been titrated. We used particles of Scenedesmus mutant No. 8 that lack System I and allowed the system to equilibrate with external redox mediators in darkness prior to measurement of the fluorescence rise curve.The titration of Q, as indicated by the dark level of F_i, occurs in two discrete steps. The high-potential component (Q_h) has a midpoint potential of +68 mV (pH 7.2) and accounts for ～67% of Q. The pH sensitivity of the midpoint potential is ?60 mV, indicating the involvement of 1 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$. The low-potential component (Q₁) accounts for the remaining 33% of Q and shows a midpoint potential near?300 mV (pH 7.2).The plastoquinone pool, assayed as the half-time of the fluorescence rise curve, titrates as a single component with a midpoint potential 30–40 mV more oxidizing than that of Q_h, i.e., at 106 mV (pH 7.2). The E_m shows a pH sensitivity of ?60 mV/pH unit, indicating the involvement of 1 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$. The observation that all 12–14 electron equivalents in the pool titrate as a single component indicates that the heterogeneity otherwise observed in the secondary acceptor system is a kinetic rather than a thermodynamic property.Illumination causes peculiar, and as yet unclarified, changes of both Q and the secondary pool under anaerobic conditions that are reversed by oxygen.     

Comparative EPR and thermoluminescence study of anoxic photoinhibition in Photosystem II particles

Photosystem II particles were exposed to 800 W m^–2 white light at 20 °C under anoxic conditions. The F_o level of fluorescence was considerably enhanced indicating formation of stable-reduced forms of the primary quinone electron acceptor, Q_A. The F_m level of fluorescence declined only a little. The g=1.9 and g=1.82 EPR forms characteristic of the bicarbonate-bound and bicarbonate-depleted semiquinone-iron complex, Q_A ^–Fe²⁺, respectively, exhibited differential sensitivity against photoinhibition. The large g=1.9 signal was rapidly diminished but the small g=1.82 signal decreased more slowly. The S₂-state multiline signal, the oxygen evolution and photooxidation of the high potential form of cytochrome b-559 were inhibited approximately with the same kinetics as the g=1.9 signal. The low potential form of oxidized cytochrome b-559 and Signal II_slow arising from Tyr_D ⁺ decreased considerably slower than the g=1.9 semiquinone-iron signal. The high potential form of oxidized cytochrome b-559 was diminished faster than the low potential form. Photoinhibition of the g=1.9 and g=1.82 forms of Q_A was accompanied with the appearance and gradual saturation of the spin-polarized triplet signal of P 680. The amplitude of the radical signal from photoreducible pheophytin remained constant during the 3 hour illumination period. In the thermoluminescence glow curves of particles the Q band (S₂Q_A ^– charge recombination) was almost completely abolished. To the contrary, the C band (Tyr_D ⁺Q_A ^– charge recombination) increased a little upon illumination. The EPR and thermoluminescence observations suggest that the Photosystem II reaction centers can be classified into two groups with different susceptibility against photoinhibition.Abbreviations C band thermoluminescence band associated with Tyr-D⁺Q _a ^– charge recombination - Chl chlorophyll - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - EPR electron paramagnetic resonance - F_o initial fluorescence - F_m maximum fluorescence - Q band thermoluminescence band originating from S₂Q _a -charge recombination - Q _a the primary quinone electron acceptor of PS II - P 680 the primary electron donor chlorophyll of PS II - S₂ oxidation state of the water-splitting system - Phe pheophytin - TL thermoluminescence - Tyr _d redox active tyrosine-160 of the D₂ protein     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II. II. Redox titration at various pH values of the flash-induced formation of C550 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary quinone electron acceptor

Redox titrations of the flash-induced formation of C550 (a linear indicator of Q^?) were performed between pH 5.9 and 8.3 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary electron acceptor, B. One-third of the reaction centers show a pH-dependent midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) = ? 30 mV) for redox couple $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$, which varies by ?60 mV/pH unit. Two-thirds of the centers show a pH-independent midpoint potential (E_mm = + 10 mV) for this couple. The elevated pH-independent E_m suggests that in the latter centers the environment of Q has been modified such as to stabilize the semiquinone anion, Q^?. The midpoint potentials of the centers having a pH-dependent E_m are within 20 mV of those observed in chloroplasts having a secondary electron acceptor. It appears therefore that the secondary electron acceptor exerts little influence on the E_m of $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. An EPR signal at g 1.82 has recently been attributed to a semiquinone-iron complex which comprises Q^?. The similar redox behavior reported here for C550 and reported by others (Evans, M.C.W., Nugent, J.H.A., Tilling, L.A. and Atkinson, Y.E. (1982) FEBS Lett. 145, 176–178) for the g 1.82 signal in similar Photosystem II particles confirm the assignment of this EPR signal to Q^?. At below ?200 mV, illumination of the Photosystem II particles produces an accumulation of reduced pheophytin (Ph^?). At ?420 mV Ph^? appears with a quantum yield of 0.006–0.01 which in this material implies a lifetime of 30–100 ns for the radical pair P-680⁺Ph^?.     

Properties of inactive Photosystem II centers

A fraction (usually in the range of 10–25%) of PS II centers is unable to transfer electrons from the primary quinone acceptor Q_A to the secondary acceptor Q_B. These centers are inactive with respect to O₂ evolution since their reopening after photochemical charge separation to the S₂O_A ^- state involves predominantly a back reaction to S₁Q_A in the few seconds time range (slower phases are also occurring). Several properties of these centers are analyzed by fluorescence and absorption change experiments. The initial rise phase F_o-F_pl of fluorescence induction under weak illumination reflects both the closure of inactive centers and the modulation of the fluorescence yield by the S-states of the oxygen-evolving system: We estimate typical relative amplitudes of these contributions as, respectively, 65 and 35% of the F_o-F_pl amplitude. The half-rise time of this phase is significantly shorter than for the fluorescence induction in the presence of DCMU (in which all centers are involved). This finding is shown to be consistent with inactive centers sharing the same light-harvesting antenna as normal centers, a view which is also supported by comparing the dependence of the fluorescence yield on the amount of closed active or inactive centers estimated through absorption changes. It is argued that the exponential kinetics of the F_o-F_pl phase does not indicate absence of excitation energy transfer between the antennas of inactive and active centers. We show that the acceptor dichlorobenzoquinone does not restore electron transfer in inactive centers, in disagreement with previous suggestions. We confirm, however, the enhancement of steady-state electron flow caused by this quinone and suggest that it acts by relieving a blocking step involved in the reoxidation of a fraction of the plastoquinone pool. Part of the discrepancies between the present results and those from previous literature may arise from the confusion of inactive centers characterized on a single turnover basis and PS II centers that become blocked under steady-state conditions because of deficient reoxidation of their secondary acceptors.Abbreviations DCBQ 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - DMQ 2,5-dimethyl-p-benzoquinone - PS photosystem