Chromosomal abnormalities and tumor development: from genes to therapeutic mechanisms

This article highlights the recent advances in our understanding of the molecular structure and function of proteins that are activated or created by chromosomal abnormalities and discusses their possible role in tumor development. The molecular characterization of these proteins has revealed that tumor-specific fusion proteins are the consequence of the majority of chromosomal translocations associated with leukemias and solid tumors. A common theme that emerges is that creation of these proteins disrupts the normal development of tumor-specific target cells by blocking apoptosis. These insights identify these chromosomal translocation-associated genes as potential targets for improved cancer therapies. BioEssays 20:922–930, 1998. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

In this issue of Epigenetics

The pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemias involves complex molecular events triggered by diverse alterations of genomic DNA. A limited number of initiating lesions, such as chromosomal translocations generating fusion genes, are constantly identified in specific forms of leukemia and are critical to leukemogenesis. Leukemia fusion proteins derived from chromosomal translocations can mediate epigenetic silencing of gene expression. Epigenetic deregulation of the DNA methylation status and of the chromatin “histone code” at specific gene sites cooperate in the pathogenesis of leukemias. The neutralization of these crucial oncogenic events can revert the leukemia phenotype. Thus, their identification and the study of their molecular and biological consequences is essential for the development of novel and specific therapeutic strategies. In this context, we recently reported a link between the differentiation block of leukemia and the epigenetic silencing of the microRNA-223 gene by the AML1/ETO oncoprotein, the product of the t(8;21) the commonest AML-associated chromosomal translocation. This finding indicates microRNAs as additional epigenetic targets for leukemogenesis and for therapeutic intervention in leukemias.     

Dichotomy of AML1-ETO Functions: Growth Arrest versus Block of Differentiation

The fusion gene AML1-ETO is the product of t(8;21)(q22;q22), one of the most common chromosomal translocations associated with acute myeloid leukemia. To investigate the impact of AML1-ETO on hematopoiesis, tetracycline-inducible AML1-ETO-expressing cell lines were generated using myeloid cells. AML1-ETO is tightly and strongly induced upon tetracycline withdrawal. The proliferation of AML1-ETO(+) cells was markedly reduced, and most of the cells eventually underwent apoptosis. RNase protection assays revealed that the amount of Bcl-2 mRNA was decreased after AML1-ETO induction. Enforced expression of Bcl-2 was able to significantly delay, but not completely overcome, AML1-ETO-induced apoptosis. Prior to the onset of apoptosis, we also studied the ability of AML1-ETO to modulate differentiation. AML1-ETO expression altered granulocytic differentiation of U937T-A/E cells. More significantly, this change of differentiation was associated with the down-regulation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha), a key regulator of granulocytic differentiation. These observations suggest a dichotomy in the functions of AML1-ETO: (i) reduction of granulocytic differentiation correlated with decreased expression of C/EBPalpha and (ii) growth arrest leading to apoptosis with decreased expression of CDK4, c-myc, and Bcl-2. We predict that the preleukemic AML1-ETO(+) cells must overcome AML1-ETO-induced growth arrest and apoptosis prior to fulfilling their leukemogenic potential.     

The core-binding factor leukemias: lessons learned from murine models

The recent development of murine models of core-binding factor leukemias has provided important insights into the underlying molecular pathology of this common subtype of acute myeloid leukemia. Evidence from these models supports the idea that acute myeloid leukemia 1/core-binding factor beta-subunit (AML1/CBFbeta) has a critical role in the control of the self-renewal capacity of hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny. Moreover, the accumulated data demonstrate that the expression of translocation-encoded AML1 or CBFbeta fusion proteins are insufficient by themselves to induce a full leukemic phenotype. The models that have been developed should prove to be of value for defining the range of mutations that can cooperate with AML1/CBFbeta fusion proteins, and for assessing novel therapies targeted toward the pathways that are altered by the expression of these fusion proteins.     

The inv(16) cooperates with ARF haploinsufficiency to induce acute myeloid leukemia

The inv(16) is one of the most frequent chromosomal translocations associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and creates a chimeric fusion protein consisting of most of the runt-related X1 co-factor, core binding factor beta fused to the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain MYH11. Expression of the ARF tumor suppressor is regulated by runt-related X1, suggesting that the inv(16) fusion protein (IFP) may repress ARF expression. We established a murine bone marrow transplant model of the inv(16) in which wild type, Arf+/-, and Arf-/- bone marrow were engineered to express the IFP. IFP expression was sufficient to induce a myelomonocytic AML even when expressed in wild type bone marrow, yet removal of only a single allele of Arf greatly accelerated the disease, indicating that Arf is haploinsufficient for the induction of AML in the presence of the inv(16).     

Dangerous fusions: a path to cancer for arrested lymphoid progenitors

B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is a common malignancy associated with variable chromosomal translocations, leading to fusion proteins of unknown function. To investigate how such translocations contribute to the development of BCP-ALL , Smeenk et al ( 2017 ) generated mouse models for Pax5 fusion proteins. The results show that a PAX5 fusion is required for BCP-ALL development by preventing B-cell differentiation and retaining cells in an arrested progenitor stage. The occurrence of further genetic aberrations eventually results in oncogenic transformation and proliferation of the arrested cells, triggering the onset of leukemia.     

Leukaemic transformation by CALM-AF10 involves upregulation of Hoxa5 by hDOT1L

Chromosomal translocation is a common cause of leukaemia and the most common chromosome translocations found in leukaemia patients involve the mixed lineage leukaemia (MLL) gene. AF10 is one of more than 30 MLL fusion partners in leukaemia. We have recently demonstrated that the H3K79 methyltransferase hDOT1L contributes to MLL-AF10-mediated leukaemogenesis through its interaction with AF10 (ref. 5). In addition to MLL, AF10 has also been reported to fuse to CALM (clathrin-assembly protein-like lymphoid-myeloid) in patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Here, we analysed the molecular mechanism of leukaemogenesis by CALM-AF10. We demonstrate that CALM-AF10 fusion is both necessary and sufficient for leukaemic transformation. Additionally, we provide evidence that hDOT1L has an important role in the transformation process. hDOT1L contributes to CALM-AF10-mediated leukaemic transformation by preventing nuclear export of CALM-AF10 and by upregulating the Hoxa5 gene through H3K79 methylation. Thus, our study establishes CALM-AF10 fusion as a cause of leukaemia and reveals that mistargeting of hDOT1L and upregulation of Hoxa5 through H3K79 methylation is the underlying mechanism behind leukaemia caused by CALM-AF10 fusion.     

How does DNA break during chromosomal translocations?

Chromosomal translocations are one of the most common types of genetic rearrangements and are molecular signatures for many types of cancers. They are considered as primary causes for cancers, especially lymphoma and leukemia. Although many translocations have been reported in the last four decades, the mechanism by which chromosomes break during a translocation remains largely unknown. In this review, we summarize recent advances made in understanding the molecular mechanism of chromosomal translocations.     

Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia

Recurring chromosome abnormalities are strongly associated with certain subtypes of leukemia, lymphoma and sarcomas. More recently, their potential involvement in carcinomas, i.e. prostate cancer, has been recognized. They are among the most important factors in determining disease prognosis, and in many cases, identification of these chromosome abnormalities is crucial in selecting appropriate treatment protocols. Chromosome translocations are frequently observed in both de novo and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The mechanisms that result in such chromosome translocations in leukemia and other cancers are largely unknown. Genomic breakpoints in all the common chromosome translocations in leukemia, including t(4;11), t(9;11), t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17), t(12;21), t(1;19) and t(9;22), have been cloned. Genomic breakpoints tend to cluster in certain intronic regions of the relevant genes including MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO, CBFB, MYHI1, PML, RARA, TEL, E2A, PBX1, BCR and ABL. However, whereas the genomic breakpoints in MLL tend to cluster in the 5' portion of the 8.3 kb breakpoint cluster region (BCR) in de novo and adult patients and in the 3' portion in infant leukemia patients and t-AML patients, those in both the AML1 and ETO genes occur in the same clustered regions in both de novo and t-AML patients. These differences may reflect differences in the mechanisms involved in the formation of the translocations. Specific chromatin structural elements, such as in vivo topoisomerase II (topo II) cleavage sites, DNase I hypersensitive sites and scaffold attachment regions (SARs) have been mapped in the breakpoint regions of the relevant genes. Strong in vivo topo II cleavage sites and DNase I hypersensitive sites often co-localize with each other and also with many of the BCRs in most of these genes, whereas SARs are associated with BCRs in MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO and ABL, but not in the BCR gene. In addition, the BCRs in MLL, AML1 and ETO have the lowest free energy level for unwinding double strand DNA. Virtually all chromosome translocations in leukemia that have been analyzed to date show no consistent homologous sequences at the breakpoints, whereas a strong non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair signature exists at all of these chromosome translocation breakpoint junctions; this includes small deletions and duplications in each breakpoint, and micro-homologies and non-template insertions at genomic junctions of each chromosome translocation. Surprisingly, the size of these deletions and duplications in the same translocation is much larger in de novo leukemia than in therapy-related leukemia. We propose a non-homologous chromosome recombination model as one of the mechanisms that results in chromosome translocations in leukemia. The topo II cleavage sites at open chromatin regions (DNase I hypersensitive sites), SARs or the regions with low energy level are vulnerable to certain genotoxic or other agents and become the initial breakage sites, which are followed by an excision end joining repair process.