Sphingolipid topology and the dynamic organization and function of membrane proteins

When acquiring internal membranes and vesicular transport, eukaryotic cells started to synthesize sphingolipids and sterols. The physical differences between these and the glycerophospholipids must have enabled the cells to segregate lipids in the membrane plane. Localizing this event to the Golgi then allowed them to create membranes of different lipid composition, notably a thin, flexible ER membrane, consisting of glycerolipids, and a sturdy plasma membrane containing at least 50% sphingolipids and sterols. Besides sorting membrane proteins, in the course of evolution the simple sphingolipids obtained key positions in cellular physiology by developing specific interactions with (membrane) proteins involved in the execution and control of signaling. The few signaling sphingolipids in mammals must provide basic transmission principles that evolution has built upon for organizing the specific regulatory pathways tuned to the needs of the different cell types in the body.     

Sphingolipid symmetry governs membrane lipid raft structure

Lipid domain formation in membranes underlies the concept of rafts but their structure is controversial because the key role of cholesterol has been challenged. The configuration of glycosphingolipid receptors for agonists, bacterial toxins and enveloped viruses in plasma membrane rafts appears to be an important factor governing ligand binding and infectivity but the details are as yet unresolved. I have used X-ray diffraction methods to examine how cholesterol affects the distribution of glycosphingolipid in aqueous dispersions of an equimolar mixture of cholesterol and egg-sphingomyelin containing different proportions of glucosylceramide from human extracts. Three coexisting liquid-ordered bilayer structures are observed at 37 °C in mixtures containing up to 20 mol% glycosphingolipid. All the cholesterol was sequestered in one bilayer with the minimum amount of sphingomyelin (33 mol%) to prevent formation of cholesterol crystals. The other two bilayers consisted of sphingomyelin and glucosylceramide. Asymmetric molecular species of glucosylceramide with N-acyl chains longer than 20 carbons form an equimolar complex with sphingomyelin in which the glycosidic residues are arranged in hexagonal array. Symmetric molecular species mix with sphingomyelin in proportions less than equimolar to form quasicrystalline bilayers. When the glycosphingolipid exceeds equimolar proportions with sphingomyelin cholesterol is incorporated into the structure and formation of a gel phase of glucosylceramide is prevented. The demonstration of particular structural features of ceramide molecular species combined with the diversity of sugar residues of glycosphingolipid classes paves the way for a rational approach to understanding the functional specificity of lipid rafts and how they are coupled across cell membranes.     

Fatty acid-dependent globotriaosyl ceramide receptor function in detergent resistant model membranes

Glycosphingolipid (GSL) fatty acid strictly regulates verotoxin 1 (VT1) and the HIV adhesin, gp120 binding to globotriaosyl ceramide within Gb(3)/cholesterol detergent resistant membrane (DRM) vesicle constructs and in Gb(3) water-air interface monolayers in a similar manner. VT2 bound Gb(3)/cholesterol vesicles irrespective of fatty acid composition, but VT1 bound neither C18 nor C20Gb(3)vesicles. C18/C20Gb(3) were dominant negative in mixed Gb(3) fatty acid isoform vesicles, but including C24:1Gb(3) gave maximal binding. VT1 bound C18Gb(3) vesicles after cholesterol removal, but C20Gb(3)vesicles required sphingomyelin in addition for binding. HIV-1gp120 also bound C16, C22, and C24, but neither C18 nor C20Gb(3) vesicles. C18 and C20Gb(3) were, in mixtures without C24:1Gb(3), dominant negative for gp120 vesicle binding. Gp120/VT1bound C18 and C24:1Gb(3) mixtures, although neither isoform bound alone. Monolayer surface pressure measurement showed VT1, but not VT2, bound Gb(3) at cellular DRM surface pressures, and confirmed loss of VT1 and gp120 (but not VT2) specific C18Gb(3) binding. We conclude fatty-acid mediated fluidity within simple model GSL/cholesterol DRM can selectively regulate GSL carbohydrate-ligand binding.     

Effects of ceramide and other simple sphingolipids on membrane lateral structure

The available data concerning the ability of ceramide and other simple sphingolipids to segregate laterally into rigid, gel-like domains in a fluid bilayer has been reviewed. Ceramides give rise to rigid ceramide-enriched domains when their N-acyl chain is longer than C12. The high melting temperature of hydrated ceramides, revealing a tight intermolecular interaction, is probably responsible for their lateral segregation. Ceramides compete with cholesterol for the formation of domains with lipids such as sphingomyelin or saturated phosphatidylcholines; under these conditions displacement of cholesterol by ceramide involves a transition from a liquid-ordered to a gel-like phase in the domains involved. When ceramide is generated in situ by a sphingomyelinase, instead of being premixed with the other lipids, gel-like domain formation occurs as well, although the topology of the domains may not be the same, the enzyme causing clustering of domains that is not detected with premixed ceramide. Ceramide-1-phosphate is not likely to form domains in fluid bilayers, and the same is true of sphingosine and of sphingosine-1-phosphate. However, sphingosine does rigidify pre-existing gel domains in mixed bilayers.     

Comparative lipid analysis and structure of detergent-resistant membrane raft fractions isolated from human and ruminant erythrocytes

The lipid composition and structure of detergent-resistant membrane rafts from human, goat, and sheep erythrocytes is investigated. While the sphingomyelin:cholesterol ratio varied from about 1:5 in human to 1:1 in sheep erythrocytes a ratio of 1:1 was found in all raft preparations insoluble in Triton X-100 at 4 degrees C. Excess cholesterol is excluded from rafts and saturated molecular species of sphingomyelin assayed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determines the solubility of cholesterol in the detergent. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy shows that vesicles and multilamellar structures formed by membrane rafts have undergone considerable rearrangement from the original membrane. No membrane-associated particles are observed. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction studies showed that d spacings of vesicle preparations of rafts cannot be distinguished from ghost membranes from which they are derived. Dispersions of total polar lipid extracts of sheep rafts show phase separation of inverted hexagonal structure upon heating and this phase coexists with multilamellar structures at 37 degrees C.     

Modeling the membrane environment has implications for membrane protein structure and function: Influenza A M2 protein

The M2 protein, a proton channel, from Influenza A has been structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction and by solution and solid‐state NMR spectroscopy in a variety of membrane mimetic environments. These structures show substantial backbone differences even though they all present a left‐handed tetrameric helical bundle for the transmembrane domain. Variations in the helix tilt influence drug binding and the chemistry of the histidine tetrad responsible for acid activation, proton selectivity and transport. Some of the major structural differences do not arise from the lack of precision, but instead can be traced to the influences of the membrane mimetic environments. The structure in lipid bilayers displays unique chemistry for the histidine tetrad, which binds two protons cooperatively to form a pair of imidazole‐imidazolium dimers. The resulting interhistidine hydrogen bonds contribute to a three orders of magnitude enhancement in tetramer stability. Integration with computation has provided detailed understanding of the functional mechanism for proton selectivity, conductance and gating of this important drug target.     

Oligomeric state and membrane binding behaviour of creatine kinase isoenzymes: Implications for cellular function and mitochondrial structure

The membrane binding properties of cytosolic and mitochondrial creatine kinase isoenzymes are reviewed in this article. Differences between both dimeric and octameric mitochondrial creatine kinase (Mi-CK) attached to membranes and the unbound form are elaborated with respect to possible biological function. The formation of crystalline mitochondrial inclusions under pathological conditions and its possible origin in the membrane attachment capabilities of Mi-CK are discussed. Finally, the implications of these results on mitochondrial energy transduction and structure are presented.     

Crystal structure of the receptor binding domain of the botulinum C-D mosaic neurotoxin reveals potential roles of lysines 1118 and 1136 in membrane interactions

The botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) produced by different strains of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum are responsible for the disease botulism and include a group of immunologically distinct serotypes (A, B, E, and F) that are considered to be the most lethal natural proteins known for humans. Two BoNT serotypes, C and D, while rarely associated with human infection, are responsible for deadly botulism outbreaks afflicting animals. Also associated with animal infections is the BoNT C–D mosaic protein (BoNT/CD), a BoNT subtype that is essentially a hybrid of the BoNT/C (∼two-third) and BoNT/D (∼one-third) serotypes. While the amino acid sequence of the heavy chain receptor binding (HCR) domain of BoNT/CD (BoNT/CD-HCR) is very similar to the corresponding amino acid sequence of BoNT/D, BoNT/CD-HCR binds synaptosome membranes better than BoNT/D-HCR. To obtain structural insights for the different membrane binding properties, the crystal structure of BoNT/CD-HCR (S867-E1280) was determined at 1.56 Å resolution and compared to previously reported structures for BoNT/D-HCR. Overall, the BoNT/CD-HCR structure is similar to the two sub-domain organization observed for other BoNT HCRs: an N-terminal jellyroll barrel motif and a C-terminal β-trefoil fold. Comparison of the structure of BoNT/CD-HCR with BoNT/D-HCR indicates that K1118 has a similar structural role as the equivalent residue, E1114, in BoNT/D-HCR, while K1136 has a structurally different role than the equivalent residue, G1132, in BoNT/D-HCR. Lysine-1118 forms a salt bridge with E1247 and may enhance membrane interactions by stabilizing the putative membrane binding loop (K1240-N1248). Lysine-1136 is observed on the surface of the protein. A sulfate ion bound to K1136 may mimic a natural interaction with the negatively changed phospholipid membrane surface. Liposome-binding experiments demonstrate that BoNT/CD-HCR binds phosphatidylethanolamine liposomes more tightly than BoNT/D-HCR.     

Cholesterol trafficking and raft-like membrane domain composition mediate scavenger receptor class B type 1-dependent lipid sensing in intestinal epithelial cells

Scavenger receptor Class B type 1 (SR-B1) is a lipid transporter and sensor. In intestinal epithelial cells, SR-B1-dependent lipid sensing is associated with SR-B1 recruitment in raft-like/ detergent-resistant membrane domains and interaction of its C-terminal transmembrane domain with plasma membrane cholesterol. To clarify the initiating events occurring during lipid sensing by SR-B1, we analyzed cholesterol trafficking and raft-like domain composition in intestinal epithelial cells expressing wild-type SR-B1 or the mutated form SR-B1-Q445A, defective in membrane cholesterol binding and signal initiation. These features of SR-B1 were found to influence both apical cholesterol efflux and intracellular cholesterol trafficking from plasma membrane to lipid droplets, and the lipid composition of raft-like domains. Lipidomic analysis revealed likely participation of d18:0/16:0 sphingomyelin and 16:0/0:0 lysophosphatidylethanolamine in lipid sensing by SR-B1. Proteomic analysis identified proteins, whose abundance changed in raft-like domains during lipid sensing, and these included molecules linked to lipid raft dynamics and signal transduction. These findings provide new insights into the role of SR-B1 in cellular cholesterol homeostasis and suggest molecular links between SR-B1-dependent lipid sensing and cell cholesterol and lipid droplet dynamics.     

Interaction of membrane/lipid rafts with the cytoskeleton: Impact on signaling and function : Membrane/lipid rafts,mediators of cytoskeletal arrangement and cell signaling

The plasma membrane in eukaryotic cells contains microdomains that are enriched in certain glycosphingolipids, gangliosides, and sterols (such as cholesterol) to form membrane/lipid rafts (MLR). These regions exist as caveolae, morphologically observable flask-like invaginations, or as a less easily detectable planar form. MLR are scaffolds for many molecular entities, including signaling receptors and ion channels that communicate extracellular stimuli to the intracellular milieu. Much evidence indicates that this organization and/or the clustering of MLR into more active signaling platforms depends upon interactions with and dynamic rearrangement of the cytoskeleton. Several cytoskeletal components and binding partners, as well as enzymes that regulate the cytoskeleton, localize to MLR and help regulate lateral diffusion of membrane proteins and lipids in response to extracellular events (e.g., receptor activation, shear stress, electrical conductance, and nutrient demand). MLR regulate cellular polarity, adherence to the extracellular matrix, signaling events (including ones that affect growth and migration), and are sites of cellular entry of certain pathogens, toxins and nanoparticles. The dynamic interaction between MLR and the underlying cytoskeleton thus regulates many facets of the function of eukaryotic cells and their adaptation to changing environments. Here, we review general features of MLR and caveolae and their role in several aspects of cellular function, including polarity of endothelial and epithelial cells, cell migration, mechanotransduction, lymphocyte activation, neuronal growth and signaling, and a variety of disease settings. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Reciprocal influences between cell cytoskeleton and membrane channels, receptors and transporters. Guest Editor: Jean Claude Hervé.