Flexible zinc finger requirement for binding of the transcriptional activator staf to U6 small nuclear RNA and tRNA(Sec) promoters.

The transactivator Staf, which contains seven zinc finger motifs, exerts its effect on gene expression by binding to specific targets in small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene promoters. In this work, binding site selection allowed us to identify the 21-base pair ATTACCCATAATGCATYGCGG sequence as the high affinity consensus binding site for Staf. It shows a high sequence divergence with Staf-responsive elements in the Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (tRNA(Sec)) and human U6 snRNA promoters. By using a combination of approaches, we analyzed the interaction of wild-type and truncated Staf zinc finger domains with the consensus, Xenopus tRNA(Sec), and human U6 sites. Two main conclusions emerged from our data. First, the data clearly indicate that zinc finger 7 does not establish base-specific contacts in Staf-DNA complexes. The second conclusion concerns zinc finger 1, which is required for the binding to the Xenopus tRNA(Sec) site but is dispensable in the case of the human U6 site. Taking into account the sequence differences in the two sites, these findings demonstrate that Staf utilizes zinc finger 1 in a rather flexible manner, illustrating how a protein can interact with DNAs containing targets of different sequences.     

Structural organization of Staf-DNA complexes

The transactivator Staf, which contains seven contiguous zinc fingers of the C₂-H₂ type, exerts its effects on gene expression by binding to specific targets in vertebrate small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene promoters. Here, we have investigated the interaction of the Staf zinc finger domain with the optimal Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (xtRNA^Sec) and human U6 snRNA (hU6) Staf motifs. Generation of a series of polypeptides containing increasing numbers of Staf zinc fingers tested in binding assays, by interference techniques and by binding site selection served to elucidate the mode of interaction between the zinc fingers and the Staf motifs. Our results provide strong evidence that zinc fingers 3–6 represent the minimal zinc finger region for high affinity binding to Staf motifs. Furthermore, we show that the binding of Staf is achieved through a broad spectrum of close contacts between zinc fingers 1–6 and xtRNA^Sec or optimal sites or between zinc fingers 3–6 and the hU6 site. Extensive DNA major groove contacts contribute to the interaction with Staf that associates more closely with the non-template than with the template strand. Based on these findings and the structural information provided by the solved structures of other zinc finger–DNA complexes, we propose a model for the interaction between Staf zinc fingers and the xtRNA^Sec, optimal and hU6 sites.