Y1 receptors for neuropeptide Y are coupled to mobilization of intracellular calcium and inhibition of adenylate cyclase

Two types of binding sites have previously been described for neuropeptide Y (NPY), called Y1 and Y2 receptors. The intracellular events following Y1 receptor activation was studied in the human neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-MC. Both NPY and the specific Y1 receptor ligand, [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY, caused a rapid and transient increase in the concentration of free calcium in the cytoplasm as measured by the fluorescent probe, Fura-2. The effect of both peptides was independent of extracellular calcium as addition of EGTA or manganese neither changed the size nor the shape of the calcium response. The calcium response to NPY was abolished by pretreatment with thapsigargin, which can selectively deplete a calcium store in the endoplasmic reticulum. Y1 receptor stimulation, by both NPY and [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, also inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP production with an EC50 of 3.5 nM. There was a close relation between the receptor binding and the cellular effects as half-maximal displacement of [125I-Tyr36]monoiodoNPY from the receptor was obtained with 2.1 nM NPY. The Y2-specific ligand NPY(16-36)peptide had no effect on either intracellular calcium or cAMP levels in the SK-N-MC cells. It is concluded that Y1 receptor stimulation is associated with both mobilization of intracellular calcium and inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity.     

Novel cell line selectively expressing neuropeptide Y-Y2 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) recognition by the human neuroblastoma cell lines SiMa, Kelly, SH-SY5Y, CHP-234, and MHH-NB-11 was analyzed in radioactive binding assays using tritiated NPY. For the cell lines CHP-234 and MHH-NB-11 binding of [3H]propionyl-NPY was observed with Kd-values of 0.64 +/- 0.07 nM and 0.53 +/- 0.12 nM, respectively, determined by saturation analysis with non-linear regression. The receptor subtype was determined by competition analysis using the subtype selective NPY analogues [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY (NPY-Y1, NPY-Y5), [Ahx(5-24)]-NPY (NPY-Y2), [Ala31, Aib32]-NPY (NPY-Y5), NPY [3-36] (NPY-Y2, NPY-Y5), and NPY [13-36] (NPY-Y2). Both cell lines, CHP-234 and MHH-NB-11, the latter one being characterized for NPY receptors for the first time, showed exclusive expression of NPY-Y2 receptors. In both cell lines binding of NPY induced signal transduction, which was monitored as reduction of forskolin-induced cAMP production in an ELISA.     

Nicotine evoked improvement in learning and memory is mediated through NPY Y1 receptors in rat model of Alzheimer's disease

We investigated the role of endogenous neuropeptide Y (NPY) system in nicotine-mediated improvement of learning and memory in rat model of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Intracerebroventricular (icv) colchicine treatment induced AD-like condition in rats and showed increased escape latency (decreased learning), and amnesic condition in probe test in Morris water maze. In these rats, nicotine (0.5mg/kg, intraperitoneal), NPY (100 ng/rat, icv) or NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.04 ng/rat, icv) decreased escape latency by 54.76%, 55.81% and 44.18%, respectively, on day 4 of the acquisition. On the other hand, selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 (icv) produced opposite effect (44.18%). In the probe test conducted at 24h time point, nicotine, NPY or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY increased the time spent by 72.72%, 44.11% and 26.47%, respectively; while BIBP3226 caused reduction (8.82%). It seems that while NPY or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY potentiated, BIBP3226 attenuated the learning and memory enhancing effects of nicotine. Brains of colchicine treated rats showed significant reduction in NPY-immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens shell (cells 62.23% and fibers 50%), bed nucleus of stria terminalis (fibers 71.58%), central nucleus of amygdala (cells 74.33%), arcuate nucleus (cells 70.97% and fibers 69.65%) and dentate gyrus (cells 58.54%). However, in these rats nicotine treatment for 4 days restored NPY-immunoreactivity to the control level. We suggest that NPY, perhaps acting via NPY Y1 receptors, might interact with the endogenous cholinergic system and play a role in improving the learning and memory processes in the rats with AD-like condition.     

Neuropeptide Y-Y1 receptor modulates nitric oxide level during stroke in the rat

In a rat endovascular middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model, we previously showed that intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of neuropeptide Y (NPY) or an Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY, increased the infarct volume, that an Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226, reduced the infarct volume, and that an Y2 receptor agonist, NPY3-36, had no effect. In this study, we used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to measure nitric oxide (NO) and examined how ICV administration of NPY or its receptor analogs would modulate the brain NO level between the bregma levels +2 and -4 mm during MCAO, since excessive NO mediates ischemic damage. The relative brain NO concentration was increased to 131.94 +/- 7.99% (mean +/- SEM; n = 8) at 15 min of MCAO. NPY treatment further increased the relative brain NO concentration to 250.94 +/- 50.48% (n = 8), whereas BIBP3226 significantly reduced the brain NO concentration to 69.63 +/- 8.84% (n = 8). [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY (137.61 +/- 14.54%; n = 7) or NPY3-36 (129.23 +/- 21.77%; n = 8) did not affect the brain NO concentration at 15 min of MCAO. Our results suggest that the NPY-Y1 receptor activation mediates ischemic injury via NO overproduction and that inhibition of the Y1 receptor may confer protection via suppression of excessive NO production during ischemia.     

Substance P and NPY differentially potentiate ATP and adrenergic stimulated vasopressin and oxytocin release

The supraoptic nuclei are innervated by the A1 neurons of the caudal ventrolateral medulla. Substances colocalized in the A1 terminals include norepinephrine (NE), substance P (SP), ATP, and neuropeptide Y (NPY). ATP, acting at P(2x) receptors, caused rapid and unsustained stimulation of vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) release from perifused explants of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. SP elicited a concentration-dependent stimulation of VP and OT release that was large and sustained compared with other stimuli. ATP, but not phenylephrine (PE, alpha(1)-adrenergic agonist), augmented the response to SP (1 microM). In contrast, NPY did not alter basal nor ATP-induced VP or OT release, but it did cause sustained potentiation of PE-induced VP and OT release. The Y(1)-agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY, increased VP and OT release, suggesting that the ineffectiveness of NPY reflects opposing actions at pre- and postsynaptic receptors. However, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY did not potentiate hormone responses to ATP or PE. The differential responses to these colocalized neurotransmitters and neuropeptides illustrate the range of potential responses that stimulation of this pathway might elicit from supraoptic neurons.     

Key motif to gain selectivity at the neuropeptide Y5-receptor: structure and dynamics of micelle-bound [Ala31, Pro32]-NPY

The structure of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY, a neuropeptide Y mutant with selectivity for the NPY Y(5)-receptor (Cabrele, C., Wieland, H. A., Stidsen, C., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., (2002) Biochemistry XX, XXXX-XXXX (companion paper)), has been characterized in the presence of the membrane mimetic dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles using high-resolution NMR techniques. The overall topology closely resembles the fold of the previously described Y(5)-receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY (Cabrele, C., Langer, M., Bader, R., Wieland, H. A., Doods, H. N., Zerbe, O., and Beck-Sickinger, A. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem 275, 36043-36048). Similar to wild-type neuropeptide Y (NPY) and [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY, the N-terminal residues Tyr(1)-Asp(16) are disordered in solution. Starting from residue Leu(17), an alpha helix extends toward the C-terminus. The decreased density of medium-range NOEs for the C-terminal residues resulting in larger RMSD values for the backbone atoms of Ala(31)-Tyr(36) indicates that the alpha helix has become interrupted through the [Ala(31), Pro(32)] mutation. This finding is further supported by (15)N-relaxation data through which we can demonstrate that the well-defined alpha helix is restricted to residues 17-31, with the C-terminal tetrapeptide displaying increased flexibility as compared to NPY. Surprisingly, increased generalized order parameter as well as decreased (3)J(HN)(alpha) scalar coupling constants reveal that the central helix is stabilized in comparison to wild-type NPY. Micelle-integrating spin labels were used to probe the mode of association of the helix with the membrane mimetic. The Y(5)-receptor-selective mutant and NPY share a similar orientation, which is parallel to the lipid surface. However, signal reductions due to efficient electron, nuclear spin relaxation were much less pronounced for the surface-averted residues in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY when compared to wild-type DPC-bound NPY. Only the signals of residues Asn(29) and Leu(30) were significantly more reduced in the mutant. The postulation of a different membrane binding mode of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY is further supported by the faster H/D exchange at the C-terminal amide protons. We conclude that arginine residues 33 and 35, which are believed to be directly involved in forming contacts to acidic receptor residues at the membrane-water interface, are no longer fixed in a well-defined conformation close to the membrane surface in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY.     

NPY receptors and opioidergic system are involved in NPY-induced feeding in goldfish

The present study evaluated the effects of both intraperitoneal (i.p. ) and intracerebroventricular administration of selective Y(1) [(Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY] and Y(2) [(Pro(13), Tyr(36))-NPY (13-36)] receptor agonists on food intake in satiated goldfish. Food intake (FI) was significantly increased by central administration of the Y(1) agonist (1 microg), but not by the Y(2) agonist, at 2 h postinjection. The feeding increase induced by (Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY was in a similar magnitude to that obtained after ICV injection of the neuropeptide Y, and both feeding stimulations were reversed by the NPY (27-36), a general NPY antagonist. The i.p. administration of the agonists either did not significantly modify (Y(2) agonist) or decreased (Y(1) agonist) food intake in goldfish. These data indicate that it is the Y(1)-like (similar to Y(1) and/or Y(5)) receptor, and not Y(2), that is involved in the central modulation of the feeding behavior in goldfish. We also investigated the possible involvement of opioid peptides as mediators of the NPY stimulatory action on food intake in goldfish. The ICV administration of naloxone (10 microg), a general opioid antagonist, blocked the NPY-induced feeding in goldfish, suggesting that the opioidergic system is involved in feeding regulation by NPY.     

Neuropeptide Y inhibits estrous behavior and stimulates feeding via separate receptors in Syrian hamsters

Central injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increase food intake in Syrian hamsters; however, the effect of NPY on sexual behavior in hamsters is not known nor are the receptor subtypes involved in feeding and sexual behaviors. We demonstrate that NPY inhibits lordosis duration in a dose-related fashion after lateral ventricular injection in ovariectomized, steroid-primed Syrian hamsters. Under the same conditions, we compared the effect of two receptor-differentiating agonists derived from peptide YY (PYY), PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY, on lordosis duration and food intake. PYY-(3-36) produced a 91% reduction in lordosis duration at 0.24 nmol. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY was less potent, producing a reduction in lordosis duration (66%) only at 2.4 nmol. These results suggest NPY effects on estrous behavior are principally mediated by Y2 receptors. PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY stimulated comparable dose-related increases in total food intake (2 h), suggesting Y5 receptors are involved in feeding. The significance of different NPY receptor subtypes controlling estrous and feeding behavior is highlighted by results on expression of Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) elicited by either PYY-(3-36) or [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY at a dose of each that differentiated between the two behaviors. Some differences were seen in the distribution of Fos-IR produced by the two peptides. Overall, however, the patterns of expression were similar. Our behavioral and anatomic results suggest that NPY-containing pathways controlling estrous and feeding behavior innervate similar nuclei, with the divergence in pathways controlling the separate behaviors characterized by linkage to different NPY receptor subtypes.     

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitors disrupt AKAP79-dependent PKC signaling to GluA1 AMPA receptors

GluA1 (formerly GluR1) AMPA receptor subunit phosphorylation at Ser-831 is an early biochemical marker for long-term potentiation and learning. This site is a substrate for Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and protein kinase C (PKC). By directing PKC to GluA1, A-kinase anchoring protein 79 (AKAP79) facilitates Ser-831 phosphorylation and makes PKC a more potent regulator of GluA1 than CaMKII. PKC and CaM bind to residues 31-52 of AKAP79 in a competitive manner. Here, we demonstrate that common CaMKII inhibitors alter PKC and CaM interactions with AKAP79(31-52). Most notably, the classical CaMKII inhibitors KN-93 and KN-62 potently enhanced the association of CaM to AKAP79(31-52) in the absence (apoCaM) but not the presence of Ca(2+). In contrast, apoCaM association to AKAP79(31-52) was unaffected by the control compound KN-92 or a mechanistically distinct CaMKII inhibitor (CaMKIINtide). In vitro studies demonstrated that KN-62 and KN-93, but not the other compounds, led to apoCaM-dependent displacement of PKC from AKAP79(31-52). In the absence of CaMKII activation, complementary cellular studies revealed that KN-62 and KN-93, but not KN-92 or CaMKIINtide, inhibited PKC-mediated phosphorylation of GluA1 in hippocampal neurons as well as AKAP79-dependent PKC-mediated augmentation of recombinant GluA1 currents. Buffering cellular CaM attenuated the ability of KN-62 and KN-93 to inhibit AKAP79-anchored PKC regulation of GluA1. Therefore, by favoring apoCaM binding to AKAP79, KN-62 and KN-93 derail the ability of AKAP79 to efficiently recruit PKC for regulation of GluA1. Thus, AKAP79 endows PKC with a pharmacological profile that overlaps with CaMKII.     

Parathyroid hormone synergizes with non‐cyclic AMP pathways to activate the cyclic AMP response element

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) activates multiple signaling pathways following binding to the PTH1 receptor in osteoblasts. Previous work revealed a discrepancy between cAMP stimulation and CRE reporter activation of truncated PTH peptides, suggesting that additional signaling pathways contribute to activation of the CRE. Using a CRE‐Luciferase reporter containing multiple copies of the CRE stably transfected into the osteoblastic cell line Saos‐2, we tested the ability of modulators of alternative pathways to activate the CRE or block the PTH‐induced activation of the CRE. Activators of non‐cyclic AMP pathways, that is, EGF (Akt, MAPK, JAK/STAT pathways); thapsigargin (intracellular calcium pathway); phorbol myristate acetate (protein kinase C, PKC pathway) induced minor increases in CRE‐luciferase activity alone but induced dramatic synergistic effects in combination with PTH. The protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H‐89 (10 µM) almost completely blocked PTH‐induced activation of the CRE‐reporter. Adenylate cyclase inhibitors SQ 22536 and DDA had profound and time‐dependent biphasic effects on the CRE response. The MAPK inhibitor PD 98059 partially inhibited basal and PTH‐induced CRE activity to the same degree, while the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide (BIS) had variable effects. The calmodulin kinase II inhibitor KN‐93 had no significant effect on the response to PTH. We conclude that non‐cAMP pathways (EGF pathway, calcium pathway, PKC pathway) converge on, and have synergistic effects on, the response of a CRE reporter to PTH. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 887–895, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Cloning and functional expression of the hNPY Y5 receptor in human endometrial cancer (HEC-1B) cells

Aiming to develop a functional assay for the human NPY Y5 receptor based on adenylyl cyclase activity, HEC-1B cells, in which cAMP synthesis can be efficiently stimulated with forskolin, were selected for the transfection with the pcDNA3-Y5-FLAG and the pcDEF3-Y5 vectors. After optimization of the transfection procedure, the binding of [3H]propionyl-NPY to transiently and stably expressed Y5 receptors was determined. The affinities of NPY, NPY derivatives, and rPP (pNPY > or = p(Leu31Pro34)NPY = p(2-36)NPY > or = p(D-Trp32)NPY > p(13-36)NPY > rPP) were in accordance with the NPY Y5 receptor subtype. For [3H]propionyl-pNPY approximately 1.7 x 10(5) and 1 x 10(6) binding sites per transiently and stably transfected cell, respectively, were determined. The KD values were 2.4 +/- 0.4 and 1.7 +/-0.2 nM, respectively. Due to the high expression of the receptor protein, both stably and transiently transfected cells can be conveniently used in routine radioligand binding studies. By contrast, functional assays were only feasible with HEC-1B cells stably expressing the Y5 receptor. In these cells, 10 nM pNPY inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP synthesis by 75%. This effect was partially antagonized by the Y5 antagonist N-?trans-[4-(2-naphthylmethylamino)-methyl]cyclohexylmethyl) naphthalene-2-sulfonamide. Although the genetic variability of cancer cells is in principle incompatible with a stable phenotype, both ligand binding characteristics and functionality of the Y5 receptor remained unchanged for more than 30 passages.     

Autoradiographic reevaluation of the binding properties of 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]peptide YY and 125I-peptide YY3-36 to neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes in rat forebrain

125I-[Leu31,Pro34]peptide YY (PYY) and 125I-PYY3-36, initially described as selective neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y2 receptor ligands, respectively, were recently shown to label also Y4 and Y5 receptors. We used receptor autoradiography to assess whether these ligands can be reliably used to investigate the various neuropeptide Y receptors in rat forebrain. In most of the brain regions examined (in coronal sections at the level of dorsal hippocampus), specific 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding was completely inhibited by 1 microM BIBP-3226, a selective Y1 receptor ligand, but unaffected by 10 nM rat pancreatic polypeptide, selectively inhibiting Y4 receptors, suggesting that Y4 receptors are present in negligible numbers compared with Y1 receptors in the areas examined. Significant numbers of BIBP-3226-insensitive 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites were measured in the CA3 subfield of the hippocampus only, possibly representing Y5 receptors. 125I-PYY3-36 binding was unchanged by 1 microM BIBP-3226, whereas a population of 125I-PYY3-36 binding sites was sensitive to 100 nM [Leu31,Pro34]neuropeptide Y, likely representing Y5 receptors. The possibility of distinguishing between Y2 and Y5 receptors using 125I-PYY3-36 as radioligand was validated by their different regional distribution and their distinct changes 24 h after kainate seizures, i.e., binding to Y5 receptors was selectively decreased in the outer cortex, whereas binding to Y2 receptors was enhanced in the hippocampus. Thus, the use of selective unlabeled compounds is required for distinguishing the various receptor subtypes labeled by 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]PYY and 125I-PYY3-36 in rat brain tissue.     

Cardiorespiratory responses to intracerebroventricular injection of neuropeptide Y in anaesthetised dogs.

Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and separate, preferential agonists for NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors were observed in anaesthetised dogs. Central injections of NPY resulted in significant cardiac slowing and decreases in arterial pressure. These cardiovascular effects were blocked by central injection of the NPY Y1- preferring antagonist 1229U91. Central injection of NPY did not have a significant effect on ventilation, but the NPY Y1 antagonist 1229U91 administered alone caused a significant increase in ventilation. The NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreased ventilation while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24--36 significantly increased it. A similar inverse relationship was seen with respect to blood pressure, with the NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreasing blood pressure, while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24-36 significantly increased it. These findings suggest a role for NPY Y1 receptors in pathways mediating decreases in ventilation and blood pressure, and for NPY Y2 receptors in those mediating increased ventilation and blood pressure.     

Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor mediated mesenteric vasoconstriction in the pig in vivo

The object of the present study was to investigate the effects of the sympathetic cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY), and the closely related gut hormone peptide YY (PYY), on splanchnic blood flow regulation in the anaesthetized pig in vivo. Systemic injections of NPY, PYY and the NPY Y(1) receptor agonist [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY (470 pmol kg(-1) each) evoked pressor and mesenteric vasoconstrictor responses that were largely abolished by the selective NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist H 409/22 (60 nmol kg(-1) min(-1)). In contrast, the NPY Y(2) receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu(28)Leu(31)]NPY(24-36) (1.1 nmol kg(-1)), a dose of which potently evoked splenic NPY Y(2) receptor mediated (not affected by H 409/22) vasoconstriction, did not evoke any mesenteric vascular response. Mesenteric vascular responses to angiotensin II (10 pmol kg(-1)), alpha,beta-methylene ATP (10 nmol kg(-1)) and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (15 nmol kg(-1)), were not inhibited by H 409/22. It is concluded that NPY and PYY evokes porcine mesenteric vasoconstriction mediated by the NPY Y(1) receptor subtype, as demonstrated by selective and specific inhibition exerted by the NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist H 409/22, in vivo.