Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea

Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light.     

Red and blue light-stimulated proton efflux by epidermal leaf cells of the Argenteum mutant of Pisum sativum

Light stimulates leaf expansion in dicotyledons by increasingapoplastic acidification, cell wall loosening and solute accumulationfor turgor maintenance. Red and blue light enhance growth viadifferent photo-systems, but the cellular location and modesof action of these systems is not known. Here, the effect of red and blue light was studied on transportprocesses in epidermal cells of expanding leaves of the Argenteummutant of Pisum satlvum. Both red and blue light caused extraceiiuiaracidification by isolated epidermal tissue, which was stimulatedby extracellular K⁺ and inhibited by DCCD at 0.1 mol m^–3.Acidification induced by red compared with blue light showeddifferent saturating kinetics in fluence rate-response curves.Under near saturating light conditions the effects of red andblue light were additive. The red light-induced acidificationwas inhibited by far-red light while the blue light-inducedacidification was not. Light caused a hyperpoianzation of themembrane potential in epidermal strips, and stimulated ⁸⁶Rb⁺uptake by epidermal protoplasts. These results show that phytochromeand an additional blue light-photoreceptor function in isolatedepidermal cells to promote proton efflux, hyperpolarization,and cation uptake. Key words: Pisum sativum, light-induced acidification, ion transport, epidermis, photoreceptor     

Calcium-calmodulin signalling is involved in light-induced acidification by epidermal leaf cells of pea, Pisum sativum L.

Pathways of signal transduction of red and blue light-dependentacidification by leaf epidermal cells were studied using epidermalstrips of the Argenteum mutant of Pisum sativum. In these preparationsthe contribution of guard cells to the acidification is minimal.The hydroxypyridine nifedipine, a Ca²⁺-channel blocker, partlyinhibited the response to both blue and red light, while thephenylalkylamine, verapamil, a Ca²⁺-channel blocker that hasbeen shown in plant cells also to block K⁺-channels, causednearly complete inhibition. The Ca²⁺-channel activator S(–)BayK 8644 induced acidification when added in the dark and diminishedthe light-induced lowering of the extracellular pH. The Ca²⁺-ionophores,ionomycin and A23187 [GenBank] , also reduced the light response. Furthermore,the light-induced acidification was inhibited by the calmodulinantagonists W-7 and trifluoperazine, but not by W-5. These calmodulininhibitors completely inhibited the red light-induced acidification,but inhibited the response to blue light by only 60–70%.In general, inhibition by compounds affecting Ca-calmodulinsignalling was always stronger on the red light response thanthat on the blue light response (with the exception of verapamilthat blocked both the red and blue light responses equally well).This differential effect on red and blue light-induced responsesindicates a role for Ca²⁺-CaM signalling in both the red andblue light responses, while a second process, independent ofCa²⁺ is activated by blue light. Key words: Signal transduction, light-induced acidification, epidermal cells, pea     

Inhibition of phytochrome synthesis by gabaculine

Gabaculine (5-amino-1,3-cyclohexadienylcarboxylic acid), a transaminase inhibitor, also inhibits chlorophyll formation in plants, and the effect of this compound can be counteracted by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) (Flint, personal communication, 1984). Since it is probable that ALA also serves as a precursor to phytochrome, the effects of gabaculine on phytochrome synthesis in developing etiolated seedlings were examined using in vivo spectrophotometry. Preemergence treatment with gabaculine was found to inhibit initial phytochrome synthesis in peas (Pisum sativum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and oats (Avena sativa L.). In general, reduction in phytochrome correlated with reduction in chlorophyll. However, the extent of inhibition of phytochrome synthesis was not as great as that of chlorophyll synthesis, perhaps due to preexisting phytochrome in the seed. Foliar treatment of etiolated pea seedlings prior to light-induced destruction of phytochrome inhibited subsequent phytochrome resynthesis in the dark. These results suggest that both initial synthesis and resynthesis of phytochrome require de novo synthesis of chromophore as well as apoprotein.     

Evidence for a phytochrome-mediated phototropism in etiolated pea seedlings

Entirely etiolated pea seedlings (Pisum sativum, L. cv Alaska) were tested for a phototropic response to short pulses of unilateral blue light. They responded with small curvatures resembling in fluence-dependence and kinetics of development a phytochrome-mediated phototropic response previously described in maize mesocotyls. Irradiations from above with saturating red or far-red light, either immediately before or after the unilateral phototropic stimulus, strongly reduced or eliminated subsequent positive phototropic curvature. Only blue light from above, however, entirely eliminated curvature at all fluences of stimulus. It is concluded that the phototropism is primarily a result of phytochrome action.     

Modulation by phytochrome of the blue light-induced extracellular acidification by leaf epidermal cells of pea (Pisum sativum l.): a kinetic analysis

Blue light induces extracellular acidification, a prerequisite of cell expansion, in epidermis cells of young pea leaves, by stimulation of the proton pumping-ATPase activity in the plasma membrane. A transient acidification, reaching a maximum 2.5-5 min after the start of the pulse, could be induced by pulses as short as 30 msec. A pulse of more than 3000 micromol m-2 saturated this response. Responsiveness to a second light pulse was recovered with a time constant of about 7 min. The fluence rate-dependent lag time and sigmoidal increase of the acidification suggested the involvement of several reactions between light perception and activation of the ATPase. In wild-type pea plants, the fluence response relation for short light pulses was biphasic, with a component that saturates at low fluence and one that saturates at high fluence. The phytochrome-deficient mutant pcd2 showed a selective loss of the high-fluence component, suggesting that the high-fluence component is phytochrome-dependent and the low-fluence component is phytochrome-independent. Treatment with the calmodulin inhibitor W7 also led to the elimination of the phytochrome-dependent high-fluence component. Simple models adapted from the one used to simulate blue light-induced guard cell opening failed to explain one or more elements of the experimental data. The hypothesis that phytochrome and a blue light receptor interact in a short-term photoresponse is endorsed by model calculations based upon a three-step signal transduction cascade, of which one component can be modulated by phytochrome.     

Loss of phytochrome photoreversibility in vitro: I. Extraction and partial purification of killer

Crude pea (Pisum sativum L. var. Alaska) phytochrome extracts contain a substance, “Killer,” which interacts with the far red-absorbing form of phytochrome causing a net loss of spectrophotometrically detectable phytochrome in vitro. Killer is absent from crude extracts of Avena phytochrome, is separable from pea phytochrome by gel filtration, and is alcohol-extractable from etiolated pea seedlings. Killer activity in alcohol extracts behaved, during partial purification, in a manner identical to that derived from pea phytochrome preparations. The mass extraction and partial purification of Killer are described.     

4-amino-5-hexynoic Acid-a potent inhibitor of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in plants

4-Amino-5-hexynoic acid, a suicide inactivator of the mammalian pyridoxal phosphate-dependent 4-aminobutyric acid:2-oxoglutaric acid aminotransferase, inhibits phytochrome and chlorophyll synthesis in developing oat (Avena sativa L.), corn (Zea mays L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.), and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings. In Avena and Cucumis seedlings, respectively, inhibition of phytochrome and chlorophyll accumulation by 4-amino-5-hexynoic acid can be significantly reversed by application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. These results indicate that 4-amino-5-hexynoic acid inhibits the synthesis of 5-aminolevulinic acid in plants.     

Involvement of Ethylene in Phytochrome-mediated Carotenoid Synthesis

Accumulation of carotenoid pigments in the shoot apex of etiolated pea (Pisum sativum cv. Alaska) seedlings is completely prevented by ethylene. Under certain conditions carotenoid synthesis is normally controlled by endogenously produced ethylene. The gas completely inhibits carotenoid synthesis induced either by continuous white light or brief illumination with red light, but only partially inhibits light-induced chlorophyll formation. Far red illumination followed by red illumination reverses the action of red light on carotenoid synthesis. Red light-induced carotenogenesis is partly or wholly caused by phytochrome-mediated inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis.     

Photocontrol of Hypocotyl Elongation in De-Etiolated Cucumis sativus L. : Long Term, Fluence Rate-Dependent Responses to Blue Light

Hypocotyl growth in Cucumis sativus L. cv Ridge Greenline is inhibited by increasing blue light (B) fluence rate in a near log linear fashion once a low fluence threshold is exceeded. Deviation from log linearity at the highest fluence rate used here is due to light perceived by the cotyledons and this effect is assigned to phytochrome. This response can be removed by Norflurazon treatment, without affecting the rest of the fluence response curve.

There is also some activation of phytochrome by lower fluence rates of B, an effect which contributes to the overall inhibition of growth. Responses to photostationary state and cycling rate indicate, however, that B does not primarily act via phytochrome, but through a specific blue light photoreceptor.

     

Ethylene is not involved in the blue light-induced growth inhibition of red light-grown peas

Although the growth of intact plants is inhibited by irradiation with blue light, the growth rate of isolated stem segments is largely unaffected by blue light. We hypothesized that this loss of responsiveness was a result of ethylene production as part of the wounding response. However, we found no interaction between ethylene- and blue light-induced growth inhibition in dark- or red light-grown seedlings of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Inhibition of growth begins in dark-grown seedlings exposed to blue light within 3 min of the onset of blue light, as was known for red light-grown seedlings. By contrast, ethylene-induced inhibition of growth occurs only after a lag of 20 to 30 min or more (dark-grown seedlings) or 60 min (red light-grown seedlings). Also, the inhibition response of red light-grown seedlings is the same whether ethylene is present from the onset of continuous blue-light treatment or not. Finally the spatial distribution of inhibition following blue light was different from that following ethylene treatment.     

Stimulation of growth and ion uptake in bean leaves by red and blue light

Red and blue light both stimulate growth and ion accumulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaves, and previous studies showed that the growth response is mediated by phytochrome and a blue-light receptor. Results of this study confirm that there is an additional photosynthetic contribution from the growing cells that supports ion uptake and growth. Disc expansion in the light was enhanced by exogenous K⁺ and Rb⁺, but was not specific for anions. Light increased K⁺ accumulation and the rate of ⁸⁶Rb⁺ uptake by discs, over darkness, with no effect of light quality. The photosynthetic inhibitor, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, inhibited light-driven ⁸⁶Rb⁺ uptake by 75%. Light quality caused differences in short-term kinetics of growth and acidification of the leaf surface. At comparable fluence rates (50 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), continuous exposure to blue light increased the growth rate 3-fold after a 2-min lag, whereas red light caused a smaller growth response after a lag of 12 min. In contrast, the acidification of the leaf surface normally associated with growth was stimulated 3-fold by red light but only slightly (1.3-fold) by blue light. This result shows that, in addition to acidification caused by red light, a second mechanism specifically stimulated by blue light is normally functioning in light-driven leaf growth.     

Physiology of Movements in Stems of Seedling Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska : II. The Role of the Apical Hook and of Auxin in Nutation

The relationship between the apical hook and stem nutation in etiolated Alaska pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska) seedlings was explored. The hook and maximum nutational displacement have the same plane of symmetry, and both are affected by light acting through phytochrome. However, the two processes do not appear to be obligatorily coupled. Light effects on nutation involve at least two components, an increase in amplitude as well as an increase in frequency. These components can be separated from one another on the basis of developmental time course or red light fluence. Excision of the plumule, leaving the hook attached to the stem, inhibits photostimulated nutation. This inhibition can be overcome by application of indole-3-acetic acid to the remaining stem. If the hook is also excised, then nutation in the stem cannot be restored by indole-3-acetic acid. It is possible, although not yet proven, that the oscillatory process regulating nutation in the stem is itself localized in the hook and that rhythms in the transport of indole-3-acetic acid are involved.     

Light-controlled Leaf Expansion in Peas Grown under Different Light Conditions

Several photosystems control leaf expansion in Alaska peas (Pisum sativum). Phytochrome is known to control expansion in dark-grown peas. But plants exposed briefly to red light are insensitive to phytochrome, an insensitivity that is itself phytochrome-produced. Leaf expansion in these plants is promoted by 440 or 630 nm of light (probably mediated by protochlorophyll). Plants grown in white fluorescent light required simultaneous exposure to high intensity blue and yellow light for promotion of leaf expansion. Since these results parallel studies on light-controlled inhibition of stem elongation, shoot growth as a whole is coordinated by these photosystems. Such coordination might be a mechanism of plant competition for light.     

Photoperiodism and photocontrol of stem elongation in two photomorphogenic mutants of Pisum sativum L.

The photomorphogenic mutation lv in the garden pea (Pisum sativum L.), which appears to reduce the response to light-stable phytochrome, has been isolated on a tall, late photoperiodic genetic background and its effects further characterised. Plants possessing lv have a reduced flowering response to photoperiod relative to wild-type plants, indicating that light-stable phytochrome may have a flower-inhibitory role in the flowering response of long-day plants to photoperiod. In general, lv plants are longer and have reduced leaf development relative to Lv plants. These differences are maximised under continuous light from fluorescent lamps (containing negligible far-red (FR) light), and decrease with addition of FR to the incident light. Enrichment of white light from fluorescent lamps with FR promotes stem elongation in the wild type but causes a reduction in elongation in the lv mutant. This “negative” shade-avoidance response appears to be the consequence of a strong inhibitory effect of light rich in FR, revealed in lv plants in the absence of a normal response to red (R) light. These results indicate that the wild-type response to the R: FR ratio may be comprised of two distinct photoresponses, one in which FR supplementation promotes elongation by reducing the inhibitory effect of R, and the other in which light rich in FR actively inhibits elongation. This hypothesis is discussed in relation to functional differentiation of phytochrome types in the light-grown plant. Gene lw has been reported previously to reduce internode length and the response to gibberellin A₁, and to delay flowering. The present study shows that the lw mutation confers an increased response to photoperiod. In all these responses the lw phenotype is superficially “opposite” to the lv phenotype. The possibility that the mutation might primarily affect light perception was therefore considered. The degree of dwarfing of lw plants was found to depend upon light quality and quantity. Dwarfing is more extreme in plants grown under continuous R light than in those grown in continuous FR or blue light or in darkness. Studies of the fluence-rate response show that the lw mutation imparts a lower fluence requirement for inhibition of elongation by white light from fluorescent lamps. Dark-grown lw plants are more strongly inhibited by a R pulse than are wild-type plants but, as in the wild type, this inhibition remains reversible by FR. Light-grown lw plants show an exaggerated elongation response to end-of-day FR light. Taken together, these findings indicate that the lw mutant may be hypersensitive to phytochrome action.     

Light-controlled Stem Elongation in Pea Seedlings Grown under Varied Light Conditions

There appears to be an orderly transition from one photosensitive state to another in light-controlled stem elongation in the garden pea, Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska. Stem elongation in dark-grown plants is known to be phytochrome-controlled. However, seedlings are insensitive to phytochrome after a red light pretreatment. An action spectrum for inhibition in these seedlings has peaks at 440 and 620 nm. Protochlorophyll is suggested as the photoreceptor. If these red pretreated seedlings are further exposed to white light, sensitivity to 440 to 620 nm light is lost. Promotion by blue-green light is the only photoresponse shown by these seedlings. Inhibition of completely white light-grown seedlings required simultaneous exposure to high intensity blue light and 600 nm light.     

In vivo phytochrome reversion in immature tissue of the alaska pea seedling

Reversion of far red-absorbing phytochrome to red-absorbing phytochrome without phytochrome destruction (that is, without loss of absorbancy and photoreversibility) occurs in the following tissues of etiolated Alaska pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.): young radicles (24 hours after start of imbibition), young epicotyls (48 hours after start of imbibition), and the juvenile region of the epicotyl immediately subjacent to the plumule in older epicotyls. Reversion occurs rapidly in the dark during the first 30 minutes following initial phototransformation of red-absorbing phytochrome to far red-absorbing phytochrome. If these tissues are illuminated continuously with red light for 30 minutes, the total amount of phytochrome remains unchanged. Beyond 30 minutes after a single phototransformation or after the start of continuous red irradiation, phytochrome destruction commences. In young radicles, sodium azide inhibits this destruction, but does not affect reversion. In older tissues in which far red-absorbing phytochrome destruction begins immediately upon phototransformation, strong evidence for simultaneous far red-absorbing phytochrome reversion is obtained from comparison of far red-absorbing phytochrome loss in the dark following a single phototransformation with far red-absorbing phytochrome loss under continuous red light.     

Relationship between Chloroplast Development and ent-Kaurene Biosynthesis in Peas

Treatment of etiolated pea (Pisum sativum (L. cv. Alaska) seedlings with 2′-isopropyl-4′-(trimethylammonium chloride)-5′-methylphenyl piperidine-1-carboxylate (Amo-1618) prior to irradiation with white light inhibits photomorphogenesis and formation and stacking of thylakoid membranes in the chloroplasts, as well as (−)-kaur-16-ene (ent-kaurene)biosynthesis. Exogenous gibberellic acid also inhibits greening. A crudely determined action spectrum for the photoinduction of ent-kaurene biosynthesis shows two peaks, one in the blue region at 458 to 490 nanometers and another in the red region at 606 to 678 nanometers. The possible participation of phytochrome in the photoinduction of ent-kaurene biosynthesis is indicated by comparative effects of red, far red, and alternating red/far red irradiations on enhancement of enzyme activity. The activity of blue light as well as red shows a similarity of the photoinduction of ent-kaurene synthesis activity to the high irradiance responses, and indicates probable participation of a second photoreceptor. From these observations, it is concluded that photoinduction of ent-kaurene biosynthesis and chloroplast development in shoots are closely linked processes.     

Short term phytochrome control of oat coleoptile and pea epicotyl growth

Continuous recordings of the effect of light on oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Victory) coleoptile and pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) epicotyl growth were made. Using a single excised coleoptile 10 minutes of red light was found to promote growth after a latent period of 46 minutes. The stimulation was transient and was not far red-reversible. Blue and far red light also promoted growth with similar kinetics. The action of continuous red or far red light was similar to that of 10-minute light. The growth of the intact pea third internode (as well as excised segments) was strongly inhibited by red light, with a latent period of 80 minutes. This effect was far red-reversible, and far red and blue light caused only a slight inhibition of growth.     

Red light-induced accumulation of ubiquitin-phytochrome conjugates in both monocots and dicots

Phytochrome is rapidly degraded in vivo after photoconversion from the stable red-absorbing (Pr) form to the far red-absorbing (Pfr) form. Previously, we have shown in etiolated oat seedlings that ubiquitin-phytochrome conjugates (Ub-P) appear after Pfr formation suggesting that oat phytochrome is rapidly degraded by a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Here, we extend this observation to etiolated tissue from other monocotyledonous (corn [Zea mays. (L.)] and rye [Secale cereale (L.)] and dicotyledonous species (pea [Pisum sativum (L,)] and zucchini squash [Cucurbita pepo (L.)]). Following Pfr formation by red light, all four species synthesized a heterogeneous series of Ub-P that appeared and disappeared concomitant with the degradation of the chromoprotein. When Pfr was photoconverted back to Pr by a far-red light pulse, degradation of phytochrome ceased and the levels of Ub-P concomitantly dropped. In pea and zucchini squash, loss of Ub-P after photoconversion of Pfr back to Pr was rapid, occurring with a half-life of approximately 5 to 10 minutes. These data indicate that the accumulation of Ub-P after Pfr formation is a general phenomenon in etiolated seedlings of higher plants and further support the hypothesis that plants degrade Pfr via Ub-P intermediates.