A non‐lethal biopsy technique for sampling subcutaneous adipose tissue of small and medium‐sized birds

Analysis of fatty acids from adipose tissue can provide important information about the physiological and nutritional condition of birds. However, non‐lethal biopsy procedures and their potential negative effects on small and medium‐sized birds have not been adequately assessed. We developed a biopsy procedure for collecting small amounts of adipose tissue from the furcular area of small and medium‐sized birds (13–62 g) without adverse effects. The biopsy procedure was performed on Dunlins (Calidris alpina), a medium‐sized migratory shorebird, and small hybrid songbirds (European Goldfinch [Carduelis carduelis] × Atlantic Canary [Serinus canaria]). The biopsy involved making a skin incision 2–3 mm long on one side of the furcular region to collect 2–16 mg of adipose tissue. All birds were monitored for 2 weeks after biopsies to examine potential effects of the procedure on body mass, visible fat deposition, time for wound healing, hematocrit levels, total white blood cell counts, and heterophil:lymphocyte ratios. Visible scars were apparent for 10 d for hybrids and 6 d for Dunlins, with no evidence of infection or abnormal scar tissue formation. Body mass of songbirds did not differ before and after the biopsy, but Dunlins increased body mass and visible fat deposition after biopsy. The collection of adipose tissue in the furcular region was performed only for birds with fat scores ≥2, and the tissue collected never represented more than 0.07% of a bird's body mass; we recommend both these values to avoid any possible unknown negative effects. Our non‐lethal biopsy technique is relatively simple to perform, and we recommend it as an alternative to lethal methods for sampling adipose tissue in studies of wild and captive birds.     

Using sutures to attach miniature tracking tags to small bats for multimonth movement and behavioral studies

Determining the detailed movements of individual animals often requires them to carry tracking devices, but tracking broad-scale movement of small bats (<30 g) has been limited by transmitter technology and long-term attachment methods. This limitation inhibits our understanding of bat dispersal and migration, particularly in the context of emerging conservation issues such as fatalities at wind turbines and diseases. We tested a novel method of attaching lightweight global positioning system (GPS) tags and geolocating data loggers to small bats. We used monofilament, synthetic, absorbable sutures to secure GPS tags and data loggers to the skin of anesthetized big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in Colorado and hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus) in California. GPS tags and data loggers were sutured to 17 bats in this study. Three tagged bats were recaptured 7 months after initial deployment, with tags still attached; none of these bats showed ill effects from the tag. No severe injuries were apparent upon recapture of 6 additional bats that carried tags up to 26 days after attachment; however, one of the bats exhibited skin chafing. Use of absorbable sutures to affix small tracking devices seems to be a safe, effective method for studying movements of bats over multiple months, although additional testing is warranted. This new attachment method has the potential to quickly advance our understanding of small bats, particularly as more sophisticated miniature tracking devices (e.g., satellite tags) become available.     

Demographic costs and benefits of herbicide‐based restoration to enhance habitat for an endangered butterfly and a threatened plant

Restoring habitat degraded by invasive species is often a primary focus of conservation strategies, yet few studies investigate the effects of invasive species control on multiple at‐risk taxa. Selective herbicides are increasingly used because they can selectively reduce aggressive invasive plant species with the aim of minimizing effects on other taxa within the habitat. We conducted a four‐year experiment to test how annual application of grass‐specific herbicide affected the demography on Fender's blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi) and Kincaid's lupine (Lupinus oreganus), two federally protected species which persist in highly degraded prairie remnants in western Oregon, USA. Effects of herbicide application were transitory for the butterfly; reduction of invasive grasses increased fecundity and led to higher annual population growth (λ) at one of two conservation areas in the first season. There were no detectable differences in λ in subsequent seasons—suggesting that treatments caused neither extensive harm nor extensive benefit to the butterfly population. For the lupine, there were no detectable differences in leaf and flower abundance between control and herbicide treatments. However, greater seed production in herbicide plots in the first and third seasons suggests that lupines in herbicide‐treated plots have greater potential reproductive success. While treatments do not have a long‐term benefit to annual population growth for the butterfly, increasing reproductive success of the threatened plant may justify integrating this strategy into restoration plans. Considering the impact of restoration practices on the demography of multiple at‐risk taxa within a community is critical to effective recovery strategies.