Spontaneous release of cytosolic proteins from posttranslational substrates before their transport into the endoplasmic reticulum

In posttranslational translocation in yeast, completed protein substrates are transported across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane through a translocation channel formed by the Sec complex. We have used photo-cross-linking to investigate interactions of cytosolic proteins with a substrate synthesized in a reticulocyte lysate system, before its posttranslational translocation through the channel in the yeast membrane. Upon termination of translation, the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) are released from the polypeptide chain, and the full-length substrate interacts with several different cytosolic proteins. At least two distinct complexes exist that contain among other proteins either 70-kD heat shock protein (Hsp70) or tailless complex polypeptide 1 (TCP1) ring complex/chaperonin containing TCP1 (TRiC/CCT), which keep the substrate competent for translocation. None of the cytosolic factors appear to interact specifically with the signal sequence. Dissociation of the cytosolic proteins from the substrate is accelerated to the same extent by the Sec complex and an unspecific GroEL trap, indicating that release occurs spontaneously without the Sec complex playing an active role. Once bound to the Sec complex, the substrate is stripped of all cytosolic proteins, allowing it to subsequently be transported through the membrane channel without the interference of cytosolic binding partners.     

Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase

Translocation of proteins across membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrion, and chloroplast has been shown to be mediated by targeting signals present in the transported proteins. To test whether the transport of proteins into peroxisomes is also mediated by a peptide targeting signal, we have studied the firefly luciferase gene that encodes a protein transported to peroxisomes in both insect and mammalian cells. We have identified two regions of luciferase which are necessary for transport of this protein into peroxisomes. We demonstrate that one of these, region II, represents a peroxisomal targeting signal because it is both necessary and sufficient for directing cytosolic proteins to peroxisomes. The signal is no more than twelve amino acids long and is located at the extreme carboxy-terminus of luciferase. The location of the targeting signal for translocation across the peroxisomal membrane therefore differs from the predominantly amino-terminal location of signals responsible for transport across the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast, or mitochondrion.     

Co-translational,intraribosomal cleavage of polypeptides by the foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A peptide

During co-translational protein import into the endoplasmic reticulum ribosomes are docked onto the translocon. This prevents inappropriate exposure of nascent chains to the cytosol and, conversely, cytosolic factors from gaining access to the nascent chain. We exploited this property of co-translational translocation to examine the mechanism of polypeptide cleavage by the 2A peptide of the foot-and-mouth disease virus. We find that the scission reaction is unaffected by placing 2A into a co-translationally targeted protein. Moreover, the portion of the polypeptide C-terminal to the cleavage site remains in the cytosol unless it contains its own signal sequence. The pattern of cleavage is consistent with the proposal that the 2A-mediated cleavage reaction occurs within the ribosome itself. In addition, our data indicate that the ribosome-translocon complex detects the break in the nascent chain and prevents any downstream protein lacking a signal sequence from gaining access to the endoplasmic reticulum.     

The role of topogenic sequences in the movement of proteins through membranes.

Recent advances have led to considerable convergence in ideas of the way topogenic sequences act to translocate proteins across various intracellular membranes (Table 2). Whereas co-translational translocation and processing were previously considered the norm at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, several instances of post-translational translocation into endoplasmic reticulum microsomes in vitro have now been described. However, it must be noted that post-translational translocation in vitro is much less efficient than when endoplasmic reticulum membranes are present during translation, and it is possible that in the intact cell translocation occurs during translation. Movement of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria occurs after translation. When translocation is post-translational, proteins may perhaps traverse the membrane as folded domains, and the conformational effects of topogenic sequences on these domains may be as envisaged in Wickner's 'membrane-trigger hypothesis'. Both signal and transit sequences possess amphipathic structures which are capable of interacting with phospholipid bilayers, and these interactions may disturb the bilayer sufficiently to allow entry of the following domains of protein. There is increasing evidence that GTP is required to bind ribosomes and their associated nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Precisely how the cell's energy is applied to achieve translocation is not clear, but one possibility at the endoplasmic reticulum is that a GTP-hydrolysing transducing mechanism may exist to couple signal sequence receptor binding to movement of the nascent chain across the membrane. Electrochemical gradients are required for protein movement to the mitochondrial inner membrane and across the bacterial inner membrane. Cytoplasmic factors such as SRP, the secA gene product or a 40 kDa protein (for mitochondrial precursors) may act by binding to topogenic sequences and preventing precursor proteins as they are translated from folding into forms which cannot be translocated. Specificity in the cell may be achieved both by targetting interactions between these cytoplasmic factors and their receptors located in target membranes, and also by specific binding of the topogenic sequences to specific proteins integrated into the target membranes. Possible candidates for the latter are the protein of microsomal membranes that reacts with a photoreactive signal peptide to give a 45 kDa complex (Fig. 1), the secY gene product of the bacterial inner membrane, and receptors on the outer membranes of chloroplasts and mitochondria. Whether these aid translocation as well as recognition is not clear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Phosphorylation of hepatitis B virus precore and core proteins.

Hepatitis B virus precore and core proteins are related. The precore protein contains the entire sequence of the core protein plus an amino-terminal extension of 29 amino acids. The amino-terminal extension of the precore protein contains a signal sequence for the secretion of the precore protein. This signal sequence is removed after the translocation of the precore protein across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane to produce the precore protein derivative named P22. We demonstrate that both P22 and the core protein can be phosphorylated in cells. Microsomal fractionation and trypsin digestion experiments demonstrate that a fraction of phosphorylated P22 is located in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen. Phosphorylation of P22 likely occurs in the carboxy terminus, since the P22 derivative P16, which lacks the carboxy terminus of P22, is not phosphorylated. Linking the carboxy terminus of the precore-core protein to heterologous secretory and cytosolic proteins led to the phosphorylation of the resulting chimeric proteins. These results indicate that phosphorylation of P22 and the core protein is likely mediated by cellular kinases.     

Transmembrane orientation of glycoproteins encoded by the v-fms oncogene

The retroviral oncogene v-fms encodes a glycoprotein whose transport to the plasma membrane is required for transformation. Tryptic digestion of microsomes from transformed cells yielded membrane-protected amino-terminal fragments 40 kd smaller than intact molecules. These fragments were glycosylated, and they included v-fms-coded epitopes expressed at the cell surface. Deletion of the predicted membrane-spanning peptide generated polypeptides that were completely sequestered within microsomes. The mutant glycoproteins acquired more asparagine-linked oligosaccharide chains than did wild-type molecules, lacked kinase activity in vitro, were not transported to the cell surface, and had no transforming activity. Thus, the membrane-spanning segment in the middle of the glycoprotein interrupts translocation of nascent chains into the endoplasmic reticulum, ultimately orienting the amino-terminal domain outside the cell and the carboxy-terminal kinase domain in the cytoplasm. These topological features are similar to those of several growth factor receptors, suggesting that v-fms transforms cells through modified receptor-mediated signals.     

Prepro-alpha-factor has a cleavable signal sequence

MAT alpha Saccharomyces cerevisiae secrete a small peptide mating pheromone termed alpha-factor. Its precursor, prepro-alpha-factor, is translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum and glycosylated at three sites. The glycosylated form is the major product in a yeast in vitro translation/translocation system. However, there is another translocated, nonglycosylated product that contains a previously unidentified modification. Contrary to previous results suggesting that the signal sequence of prepro-alpha-factor is not cleaved, amino-terminal radiosequencing has identified this product as prepro-alpha-factor without its signal sequence, that is, pro-alpha-factor. The translocated, glycosylated proteins are also processed by signal peptidase. Moreover, we have found that both purified eukaryotic and prokaryotic signal peptidase can process prepro-alpha-factor. Experiments using a yeast secretory mutant (sec 18) blocked in transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi indicate that the protein is also cleaved in vivo. Finally, characterization of the Asn-linked oligosaccharide present on pro-alpha-factor in the yeast in vitro system by use of specific glucosidase and mannosidase inhibitors indicates that they have had the three terminal glucoses and probably one mannose removed. Therefore they most likely consist of Man8GlcNAc2 structures, identical to those found in the endoplasmic reticulum in vivo.     

Mutations in the signal sequence of prepro-alpha-factor inhibit both translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum and processing by signal peptidase in yeast cells.

The effects of five single-amino-acid substitution mutations within the signal sequence of yeast prepro-alpha-factor were tested in yeast cells. After short pulse-labelings, virtually all of the alpha-factor precursor proteins from a wild-type gene were glycosylated and processed by signal peptidase. In contrast, the signal sequence mutations resulted in the accumulation of mostly unglycosylated prepro-alpha-factor after a short labeling interval, indicating a defect in translocation of the protein into the endoplasmic reticulum. Confirming this interpretation, unglycosylated mutant prepro-alpha-factor in cell extracts was sensitive to proteinase K and therefore in a cytosolic location. The signal sequence mutations reduced the rate of translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum by as much as 25-fold or more. In at least one case, mutant prepro-alpha-factor molecules were translocated almost entirely posttranslationally. Four of the five mutations also reduced the rate of proteolytic processing by signal peptidase in vivo, even though the signal peptide alterations are not located near the cleavage site. This study demonstrates that a single-amino-acid substitution mutation within a eucaryotic signal peptide can affect both translocation and proteolytic processing in vivo and may indicate that the recognition sequences for translocation and processing overlap within the signal peptide.     

Structure of the rapeseed 1.7 S storage protein, napin, and its precursor

Napin (1.7 S protein) is a basic, low molecular weight storage protein synthesized in rapeseed (Brassica napus) embryos during seed development. Napin is composed of two polypeptide chains with molecular weights of 9000 and 4000 that are held together by disulfide bonds. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of a napin cDNA clone with that of napin peptide fragments established that napin is initially synthesized as a precursor of 178 residues. This polypeptide is subsequently processed through several proteolytic events, which ultimately generate the two mature napin chains, of 86 and 29 residues, respectively. Protein biosynthesis in vitro showed that the initial translation product (Mr 20,000) contains a signal sequence which is removed during transfer of the protein into the endoplasmic reticulum. Two additional peptides, of 22 and 19 residues, as well as the COOH-terminal residue, are also removed during maturation of napin, as deduced from the sequence comparison. Comparisons of the napin sequence with other known protein sequences established that there is a significant homology between napin and two other small seed proteins, the castor bean storage protein and a trypsin inhibitor from barley.     

Mathematical modeling of the effects of the signal recognition particle on translation and translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

The kinetics of the signal recognition particle(SRP)-mediated process of protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane was studied by mathematical modeling and complementary experiments. The following results were obtained. (1) A model according to which SRP directs the ribosome, rather than the mRNA, to the membrane is supported by experiments designed to discriminate between the two alternatives. (2) This model describes both steady-state and synchronized translation experiments and makes a number of predictions. (3) The interaction between a nascent protein and SRP may be described by two parameters: (i) a binding constant which can be attributed to the structure of the signal peptide, and (ii) the size of the "SRP-window", i.e. the distance between the first and the last site on the polypeptide chain that can interact with SRP. For preprolactin a binding constant of 1 to 2.5 nmol-1l was estimated. Modeling of the synchronized synthesis of ovalbumin indicates that it has a much weaker binding constant than preprolactin (approximately 0.25 nmol-1l) although we cannot exclude the possibility that the SRP-window may be also smaller. (4) A better understanding of the molecular effects of SRP on translation and translocation through the rough endoplasmic reticulum membrane has been achieved. Inhibition of the steady-state rate of translation by SRP requires a stoichiometric interaction of SRP with ribosomes carrying nascent polypeptide chains and will occur only when ribosomes are piled up back to the initiation site. Translocation, on the other hand, requires only the catalytic action of SRP and is determined by the local concentration of protein-synthesizing ribosomes accumulated at the site(s) of SRP interaction. As a consequence, translational inhibition by SRP may sometimes fail to occur, depending either on the type of protein or on experimental conditions, such as a high mRNA concentration, even if translocation can be demonstrated. (5) A rough extrapolation to the conditions in vivo indicates that all synthesized polypeptide chains destined for translocation across or integration into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane are indeed quantitatively translocated and that no translational inhibition occurs.     

Transport of hepatitis B virus precore protein into the nucleus after cleavage of its signal peptide.

The precore and core proteins of hepatitis B virus have identical deduced amino acid sequences other than a 29-residue amino-terminal extension (precore region) on the precore protein. The first 19 of these residues serve as a signal sequence to direct the precore protein to the endoplasmic reticulum, where they are cleaved off with formation of precore protein derivative P22 for secretion. In this report, we show that P22 can alternatively be transported into the nucleus following signal peptide cleavage. Experiments with deletion mutants indicated that this nuclear transport proceeds via the cytosol and is dependent on the amino-terminal portion of P22. Thus, the hepatitis B virus precore protein is a secreted, cytosolic, and nuclear protein.     

A functional interaction between the signal peptide and the translation apparatus is detected by the use of a single point mutation which blocks translocation across mammalian endoplasmic reticulum

A functional interaction between the signal sequence and the translation apparatus which may serve as a first step in chain targeting to the membrane is described. To this end, we exploited the powerful technique of molecular cloning in a procaryotic system and the well characterized translocation system of mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. The signal peptide of subunit B of the heat labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli (EltB) was fused to several proteins. Single base substitutions were introduced in the signal peptide and their effect on protein synthesis and translocation was studied. We sought a single amino acid substitution which may define certain steps in the coordinated regulation of chain synthesis and targeting to the membrane. The substitution of proline for leucine at residue -8 in the signal peptide abolished all known functions of the signal peptide. In contrast to wild type signal peptide, the mutant signal peptide did not lead to arrest of nascent chain synthesis by signal recognition particle or translocation of the precursor protein across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Furthermore, the mutant signal peptide was not cleaved by purified E. coli signal peptidase. Interestingly, the mutation resulted in about a 2-fold increase in the rate of synthesis of the precursor protein, suggesting a role for the signal peptide in regulating the synthesis of the nascent secretory chain as a means of ensuring early and efficient targeting of this chain to the membrane. This role might involve interaction of the signal peptide with components of the translation apparatus and/or endogenous signal recognition particle. These results were obtained with three different fusion proteins carrying the signal peptide of EltB thus leading to the conclusion that the effect of the mutation on the structure and function of the signal peptide is independent of the succeeding sequence to which the signal peptide is attached.     

Misplacement of the amino-terminal positive charge in the prepro-alpha-factor signal peptide disrupts membrane translocation in vivo

We have identified a series of mutations in the signal peptide of yeast prepro-alpha-factor which specifically attenuate translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in vivo. In prepro-alpha-factor-somatostatin hybrids, transposition of the amino-terminal tripeptide from wild-type NH2-Met-Arg-Phe to NH2-Met-Phe-Lys or NH2-Met-Phe-Arg causes a 45-75% reduction in the efficiency of membrane translocation. This is evidenced by the intracellular accumulation of unglycosylated, signal-containing precursors which are membrane-associated and are exposed to the cytosol. Surprisingly, abolition of the single positive charge by replacing arginine with phenylalanine has little effect on translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. We conclude that the presence of an amino-terminal positive charge is not necessary for efficient targeting or translocation; however, misplacement by one position markedly disrupts translocation without affecting targeting. These mutations thus define an early stage of membrane interaction that is sensitive to local charge effects. Furthermore, our data suggest that post-translational translocation, signal cleavage, and core glycosylation of these polypeptides may occur to a significant extent in vivo.     

Endoplasmic reticulum targeting and glycosylation of hybrid proteins in transgenic tobacco.

The correct compartmentation of proteins to the endomembrane system, mitochondria, or chloroplasts requires an amino-terminal signal peptide. The major tuber protein of potato, patatin, has a signal peptide in common with many other plant storage proteins. When the putative signal peptide of patatin was fused to the bacterial reporter protein beta-glucuronidase, the fusion proteins were translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum in planta and in vitro. In addition, translocated beta-glucuronidase was modified by glycosylation, and the signal peptide was correctly processed. In the presence of an inhibitor of glycosylation, tunicamycin, the enzymatically active form of beta-glucuronidase was assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum. This is the first report of targeting a cytoplasmic protein to the endoplasmic reticulum of plants using a signal peptide.     

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) translocon can differentiate between hydrophobic sequences allowing signals for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition to be fully translocated into the ER lumen

The signal sequence within polypeptide chains that designates whether a protein is to be anchored to the membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is characterized by a carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic domain preceded by a short hydrophilic spacer linked to the GPI anchor attachment (omega) site. The hydrophobic domain within the GPI anchor signal sequence is very similar to a transmembrane domain within a stop transfer sequence. To investigate whether the GPI anchor signal sequence is translocated across or integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane we studied the translocation, GPI anchor addition, and glycosylation of different variants of a model GPI-anchored protein. Our results unequivocally demonstrated that the hydrophobic domain within a GPI signal cannot act as a transmembrane domain and is fully translocated even when followed by an authentic charged cytosolic tail sequence. However, a single amino acid change within the hydrophobic domain of the GPI-signal converts it into a transmembrane domain that is fully integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. These results demonstrated that the translocation machinery can recognize and differentiate subtle changes in hydrophobic sequence allowing either full translocation or membrane integration.     

Enhancement of membrane insertion and function in a type IIIb membrane protein following introduction of a cleavable signal peptide.

The human beta 2 adrenergic receptor is a type IIIb membrane protein. It has a putative seven-transmembrane topology but lacks an amino-terminal cleavable signal sequence. The mechanism by which the amino terminus of the beta 2 receptor is translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is unknown. Furthermore, it is not known if translocation as a type IIIb protein is essential for the proper folding. Our studies indicate that conversion of beta 2 receptor from a type IIIb to a type IIIa membrane protein by introducing an NH2-terminal cleavable signal sequence enhances translocation of the receptor into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, thereby facilitating expression of functional receptor.     

The signal peptide of the G protein-coupled human endothelin B receptor is necessary for translocation of the N-terminal tail across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

The initial step of the intracellular transport of G protein-coupled receptors, their insertion into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum, follows one of two different pathways. Whereas one group uses the first transmembrane domain of the mature receptor as an uncleaved signal anchor sequence for this process, a second group possesses additional cleavable signal peptides. The reason this second subset requires the additional signal peptide is not known. Here we have assessed the functional significance of the signal peptide of the endothelin B (ET(B)) receptor in transiently transfected COS.M6 cells. A green fluorescent protein-tagged ET(B) receptor mutant lacking the signal peptide was nonfunctional and retained in the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting that it has a folding defect. To determine the defect in more detail, ET(B) receptor fragments containing the N-terminal tail, first transmembrane domain, and first cytoplasmic loop were constructed. We assessed N tail translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in the presence and absence of a signal peptide and show that the signal peptide is necessary for N tail translocation. We postulate that signal peptides are necessary for those G protein-coupled receptors for which post-translational translocation of the N terminus is impaired or blocked by the presence of stably folded domains.