Deubiquitinase USP35 restrains STING-mediated interferon signaling in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal malignant tumor of female reproductive system. It is well-known that induction of STING-mediated type I interferons can enhance the resultant antitumor activity. However, STING pathway is usually inactivated in cancer cells at multiple levels. Here, we identified deubiquitinase USP35 is upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues. High level of USP35 was correlated with diminished CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and poor prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Mechanistically, we found that silencing USP35 reinforces the activation of STING-TBK1-IRF3 pathway and promotes the expression of type I interferons. Our data further showed that USP35 can directly deubiquitinate and inactivate STING. Interestingly, activation of STING promotes its binding to USP35 in a STING phosphorylation-dependent manner. Functionally, we found that knockdown of USP35 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to the DNA-damage chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin. Overall, our study indicates that upregulation of USP35 may be a mechanism of the restricted STING activity in cancer cells, and highlights the significance of USP35 as a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.Subject terms: Oncogenes, Cancer     

Effective immunotherapy of cancer by DNA vaccination.

Direct injection of naked plasmid DNA either intramuscularly or intradermally induces strong, long-lived cell-mediated and humoral immune responses to the antigen encoded by the gene vaccine. In the present study, we used gene vaccination with naked plasmid DNA to induce prophylactic immune responses to tumor associated antigens. MAGE-1 (melanoma antigen 1) is an ideal candidate for cancer vaccines because it belongs to a family of genes that are expressed in a number of human tumors of various histological types but not in normal adult tissues except for the testis, and because both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against MAGE-1 antigen were detected in tumor patients. Intradermal administration of plasmid DNA encoding MAGE-1 (pcMAGE1) induced anti-MAGE-1-specific antibody in BALB/c mice. In contrast, no detectable level of anti-MAGE-1 antibody was induced by intramuscular injection of pcMAGE1. Also, intradermal injection of pcMAGE1 was capable of generating CTLs reactive with MAGE-1-transfected murine tumor cells, M-MSV-MAGE1. Most of the mice (8 out of 10) immunized with pcMAGE1 rejected the challenge of M-MSV-MAGE1 tumor cells, compared with control animals most of which developed tumors. This suggests that intradermal DNA vaccination could provide a novel immunotherapy of cancer.     

The role of DNA mismatch repair in immunotherapy of human cancer

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is an important pathway which helps to maintain genomic stability. Mutations in DNA MMR genes are found to promote cancer initiation and foster tumor progression. Deficiency or inactivation of MMR results in microsatellite instability (MSI) which triggers neoantigen generation and impairs tumor growth. Immunotherapies targeting MMR can increase the burden of neoantigens in tumor cells. While MSI has been regarded as an important predictor of sensitivity and drug resistance for immunotherapy-based strategies. Different approaches targeting genomic instability have been demonstrated to be promising in malignancies derived from different tissues. Underlying MMR deficiency-associated immunogenicity is important for improving the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapies. In this review we provide an overview of the MMR systems, their role in tumorigenesis, drug resistance, prognostic significance and potential targets for therapeutic treatment in human cancers, especially in hematological malignancies.     

Bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy

1. Download : Download high-res image (57KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Antibody-based immunotherapy of cancer

By targeting surface antigens expressed on tumor cells, monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated efficacy as cancer therapeutics. Recent successful antibody-based strategies have focused on enhancing antitumor immune responses by targeting immune cells, irrespective of tumor antigens. We discuss these innovative strategies and propose how they will impact the future of antibody-based cancer therapy.     

Aspects of cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has traditionally undergone a 'revolution' every decade, from the use of Bacille Calmette-Guérin by scarification in the 1970s, to interleukin-2 therapies in the 1980s, and monoclonal antibody treatments in the early 1990s. Usually the early reports on the use of such agents were encouraging, but when more patients were studied in multiple centres, the initial promising results could not be confirmed. Now in a new century, we have more reagents and methods available than ever before - indeed, with such a plethora of reagents it is difficult to envisage them being fully and appropriately tested within the next decade, by which time there will be even more reagents to test. However, there have been three major advances which should lead to substantial progress in cancer immunotherapy: (1) the widespread use of genetic engineering, enabling identification of candidate vaccine proteins and manipulation of their sequences; (2) the production of antigens, antibodies and cytokines in large amounts by recombinant technologies, and (3) an understanding of the mode of presentation of peptides by major histocompatibility complex Class I and Class II molecules and their recognition by T cells. Despite these advances, there are major problems facing cancer immunotherapy, such as the ability of tumours to mutate and evade the immune system and the difficulty of precisely defining the interactions of effector cells in mediating 'rejection' or destruction of a tumour. There are clearly immunological similarities with diseases such as malaria and schistosomiasis, where the invading foreign organisms can use a variety of strategies to resist an elicited immune response. The failure to find a suitable vaccine for these diseases must lead to some pessimism for the development of immunotherapy for an autologous tumour. However, there are promising studies now in progress which should give an indication of the most important directions to follow. This review provides a commentary on aspects of cancer immunotherapy and in particular will deal with: (1) the selection of antigens as vaccine components; (2) the modes of presentation of antigens, particularly by major histocompatibility complex Class I molecules; and (3) new modes of delivery of vaccine immunogens.     

Effective immunotherapy against cancer

During the last decade, the breakthroughs in understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for immune activation and the advent of recombinant DNA technologies have changed the view on immunotherapy from a dream scenario to becoming a clinical reality. It is now clear that both cellular immunity comprising T and NK cells, as well as strategies based on antibodies, can provide strong antitumoral effects, and evidence is emerging that these strategies may also cure patients with previously incurable cancers. However, there are still a number of issues that remain unresolved. Progress in immunotherapy against cancer requires a combination of new, improved clinical protocols and strategies for overcoming mechanisms of immune escape and tumor-induced immune suppression. This review discusses some of the salient issues that still need to be resolved, focusing on the role of oxidative stress and the use of antioxidants to alleviate the immune hyporesponsiveness induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS).Abbreviations HLA Human leukocyte antigen - KIR Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor - NKR Natural killer cell receptor - ROS Reactive oxygen species - TAA Tumor-associated antigenThis work is part of the Symposium in Writing Tumor escape from the immune response, published in vol 53.     

Adoptive T-cell transfer in cancer immunotherapy

Adoptive T-cell therapy has definite clinical benefit in relapsed leukaemia after allogeneic transplant and in Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. However, the majority of tumour targets are weakly immunogenic self-antigens and success has been limited in part by inadequate persistence and expansion of transferred T cells and by tumour-evasion strategies. Adoptive immunotherapy presents the opportunity to activate, expand and genetically modify T cells outside the tolerising environment of the host and a number of strategies to optimize the cellular product, including gene modification and modulation of the host environment, in particular by lymphodepletion, have been developed.     

Adaptive T cell immunotherapy in cancer

Impaired tumor-specific effector T cells contribute to tumor progression and unfavorable clinical outcomes. As a compensatory T cell-dependent cancer immunoediting strategy, adoptive T cell therapy(ACT) has achieved encouraging therapeutic results,and this strategy is now on the center stage of cancer treatment and research. ACT involves the ex vivo stimulation and expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes(TILs) with inherent tumor reactivity or T cells that have been genetically modified to express the cognate chimeric antigen receptor or T cell receptor(CAR/TCR), followed by the passive transfer of these cells into a lymphodepleted host. Primed T cells must provide highly efficient and long-lasting immune defense against transformed cells during ACT. Anin-depth understanding of the basic mechanisms of these living drugs can help us improve upon current strategies and design better next-generation T cell-based immunotherapies. From this perspective, we provide an overview of current developments in different ACT strategies, with a focus on frontier clinical trials that offer a proof of principle. Meanwhile, insights into the determinants of ACT are discussed, which will lead to more rational, potent and widespread applications in the future.     

Checkpoint blocking antibodies in cancer immunotherapy

Cancers can be recognized by the immune system, and the immune system may regulate and even eliminate tumors. The development of checkpoint blocking antibodies, such as those directed against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1), have demonstrated significant recent promise in the treatment of an expanding list of malignancies. While both CTLA-4 and PD-1 function as negative regulators, each plays a non-redundant role in modulating immune responses. CTLA-4 attenuates the early activation of naïve and memory T cells. In contrast, PD-1 is primarily involved in modulating T cell activity in peripheral tissues via interaction with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to these therapies, and evaluation of biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes is ongoing. This review will examine the efficacy, toxicities, and clinical development of checkpoint blocking antibodies, including agents already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (anti-CTLA-4, ipilimumab) or in development (anti-PD-1, PD-L1). Future studies will likely uncover new promising immunologic checkpoints to target alone or in combination with other immunotherapeutic approaches, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and small molecules.     

Re-purposing cancer therapeutics for breast cancer immunotherapy

After decades of work to develop immune-based therapies for cancer, the first drugs designed specifically to engage the host anti-tumor immune response for therapeutic benefit were recently approved for clinical use. Sipuleucel-T, a vaccine for advanced prostate cancer, and ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody that mitigates the negative impact of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 signaling on tumor immunity, provide a modest clinical benefit in some patients. The arrival of these drugs in the clinic is a significant advance that we can capitalize on for even better clinical outcomes. The strategic and scientifically rational integration of vaccines and other direct immunomodulators with standard cancer therapeutics should lead to therapeutic synergy and high rates of tumor rejection. This review focuses on the use of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and HER-2-specific monoclonal antibodies to dissect mechanisms of immune tolerance relevant to breast cancer patients and illustrates how appropriate preclinical models can powerfully inform clinical translation. The immune-modulating activity of targeted, pathway-specific, small molecule therapeutics is also discussed. Fully understanding how cancer drugs impact the immune system should lead to the ultimate personalized cancer medicine: effective combinatorial immunotherapy strategies that simultaneously target signaling pathways essential for tumor growth and progression, and systematically break multiple, distinct immune tolerance pathways to maximize tumor rejection and effect cure.     

Booming cancer immunotherapy fighting tumors

正In 2013,cancer immunotherapy led the annual breakthroughs in Science.In fact,immunotherapy is one of the hotspots in cancer therapy,and can date back to the Coley vaccine in 1891.Advances in biotechnology and bio-engineering,especially research and development(RD)in the fields of therapeutic antibodies,checkpoint inhibitors,and engineered T cells,helped overcome the problems in tumor therapies,     

An overview of cancer immunotherapy

The survival of patients with cancer has improved steadily but incrementally over the last century, with the advent of effective anticancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the majority of patients with metastatic disease will not be cured by these measures and will eventually die of their disease. New and more effective methods of treating these patients are required urgently. The immune system is a potent force for rejecting transplanted organs or microbial pathogens, but effective spontaneous immunologically induced cancer remissions are very rare. In recent years, much has been discovered about the mechanisms by which the immune system recognizes and responds to cancers. The specific antigens involved have now been defined in many cases. Improved adjuvants are available. Means by which cancer cells overcome immunological attack can be exploited and overcome. Most importantly, the immunological control mechanisms responsible for initiating and maintaining an effective immune response are now much better understood. It is now possible to manipulate immunological effector cells or antigen-presenting cells ex vivo in order to induce an effective antitumour response. At the same time, it is possible to recruit other aspects of the immune system, both specific (e.g. antibody responses) and innate (natural killer cells and granulocytes).