Current Strategies in Ulcer Management with Special Reference to the Use of Antibiotics

Antibiotics, commonly amoxycillin, tetracycline, metronidazole and clarithromycin, are presently used in combination with anti-ulcer agents such as omeprazole, colloidal bismuth subcitrate, and sucralfate to treat Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer, and compelling evidence has accumulated that eradication of the organism prevents duodenal ulcer relapse. The latest combination (MACH I) involved omeprazole, amoxycillin or metronidazole, and clarithromycin and claimed 90-96 percent success in H. pylori eradication. While the eradication rates of the bacteria are usually between 60-80 percent, the healing rates of duodenal ulcer using these regimens have been remarkably high, often over 90 percent, even with regimens that do not contain proton-pump inhibitors. Antibiotics alone, such as furazolidone and metronidazole, have been reported to heal peptic ulcer with various successes. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled study, we showed that antibiotics alone, in the form of metronidazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin, effectively healed 92.5 percent of patients with duodenal ulcer, and that the healing was largely accountable by clearance of H. pylori. Thus, the present day evidence indicates that both healing and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcer can be achieved by treatment of H. pylori. Metronidazole resistance is emerging rapidly, especially in Asia, and is likely to affect eradication success. At this point in time, the best regimen for peptic ulcer associated with H. pylori includes the use of a proton-pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics for one to two weeks.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in Turkish children: comparison of diagnostic tests, evaluation of eradication rate, and changes in symptoms after eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is most frequently acquired in childhood. After this organism is eradicated, the rate of reinfection is low. Thus, it is very important to diagnose and treat the disease appropriately in childhood, and to be able to assess eradication with certainty. Eradication of H. pylori infection is reported to reduce or eliminate abdominal pain and dyspeptic symptoms in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 102 children who had already been diagnosed with symptomatic H. pylori infection based on gastric histopathological examination, urea breath test, rapid urease test, serology and culture. Each patient's symptoms and family history of gastrointestinal problems were recorded. Using histology as the gold standard for identifying H. pylori infection, we determined the diagnostic sensitivity of each of the other methods. Omeprazole or lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin were administered as eradication treatment, and each patient was re-evaluated by urea breath test 8 weeks later. Each child was re-interviewed about symptoms after treatment. These answers and the results of drug sensitivity testing were recorded. Cases of failed eradication were re-treated with a quadruple-drug regimen of tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth subsalicylate and omeprazole. RESULTS: The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain (89.2%). Fifty-four per cent of the subjects had a family history of dyspeptic symptoms. Sixty-six patients (64.7%) exhibited nodularity in the antral mucosa. The sensitivities of the diagnostic tests in histologically proven cases were as follows: urea breath test 100%, rapid urease test 89.2%, serology 71.9%, and culture 54.9%. Metronidazole had the highest frequency of resistance (36.4%) and the rate of clarithromycin resistance was 18.2%. The eradication rate after first-line therapy was 75.5%, and abdominal pain and dyspeptic symptoms were reduced or completely resolved in 75.7% of the successful-eradication cases. The proportion of failed-eradication cases that responded well to quadruple-drug therapy was 93.8%. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic H. pylori infection in a child should always be treated. The urea breath test is an accurate and reliable way to identify H. pylori-positive patients and to determine the response to treatment. Triple-agent therapy is effective for eradicating H. pylori infection in children and usually helps reduce or eliminate dyspeptic symptoms. The level of H. pylori resistance to metronidazole is high in our region. The significant rate of resistance to clarithromycin (18.1%) may explain the treatment failure observed in this study.     

Randomised controlled trial of short term treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether one week''s drug treatment is sufficient to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer. DESIGN--Single blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING--Specialised ulcer clinic in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS--155 patients with H pylori and a duodenal ulcer verified endoscopically which had either bled within the previous 24 hours or was causing dyspepsia. INTERVENTIONS--Patients were allocated randomly to receive either omeprazole for four weeks plus bismuth 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, and metronidazole 400 mg (all four times a day) for the first week (n = 78), or omeprazole alone for four weeks (n = 77). Further endoscopy was performed four weeks after cessation of all drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Presence or absence of H pylori (by urease testing, microscopy, and culture of antral biopsy specimens), duodenal ulcer, and side effects. RESULTS--Eradication of H pylori occurred in 70 (95%) patients taking the four drugs (95% confidence interval 86% to 97%) compared with three (4%) patients taking omeprazole alone (1% to 11%). Duodenal ulcers were found in four (5%) patients taking the four drugs (2% to 12%) and in 16 (22%) patients taking omeprazole alone (14% to 32%). Mild dizziness was the only reported side effect (six patients in each group) and did not affect compliance. CONCLUSIONS--A one week regimen of bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole is safe and effective in eradicating H pylori and reduces the number of duodenal ulcers four weeks after completing treatment.     

Four-day, twice daily, quadruple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tinidazole and omeprazole to cure Helicobacter pylori infection: a pilot study

Background. The best regimen for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection has yet to be defined. Four-day quadruple therapy with tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth, and a proton pump inhibitor has been shown to obtain a very high cure rate. However, the fact that it must be taken four times daily may interfere with compliance. The objective of the study was to test the efficacy and tolerability of a new 4-day therapy with 4 drugs taken every 12 hours to cure H. pylori infection.
Patients and Methods. Fifty-six consecutive patients with peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection were treated with an oral 4-day course with omeprazole (20 mg/12 hours), clarithromycin (500 mg/12 hours), amoxicillin (1 g/12 hours) and tinidazole (500 mg/12 hours). Efficacy of the treatment was determined at least 2 months after therapy either by biopsy (in the case of gastric ulcer) or by ¹³C-urea breath test. A second breath test was performed at least 6 months after therapy.
Results. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Forty-nine of the remaining 54 patients were cured at the first control [intention-to-treat cure rate: 87.5% (CI 95% 75–94%); per protocol cure rate: 90.7% (CI 95% 81–98%)]. Forty-three of these 49 cured patients returned for a second ¹³C urea breath-test at 6–12 months. Two of them were not cured, giving a long-term cure rate of 85.5% per protocol and 73.2% by intention-to-treat. Compliance was good, although 25 patients had mild side effects.
Conclusion. This particular four-day therapy is well tolerated, easy to follow, and achieves an acceptably high cure rate.     

'Rescue' therapy with rifabutin after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures

Aim. Eradication therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is extensively used, although it fails in a considerable number of cases. A ‘rescue’ therapy with a quadruple combination of omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics) has been recommended, but it still fails in approximately 20% of cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a rifabutin‐based regimen in patients with two consecutive H. pylori eradication failures. Patients and Methods. Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: Consecutive patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin and a second trial with omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (three patients) or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics (11 patients) had failed were included. Intervention: A third eradication regimen with rifabutin (150 mg bid), amoxicillin (1 g bid) and omeprazole (20 mg bid) was prescribed for 14 days. All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Outcome: H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative ¹³C‐urea breath test 8 weeks after completing therapy. Results. Fourteen patients have been included. Mean age ± SD was 42 ± 11 years, 41% males, peptic ulcer (57%), functional dyspepsia (43%). All patients took all the medications and completed the study protocol. Per‐protocol and intention‐to‐treat eradication was achieved in 11/14 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval = 49–95%). Adverse effects were reported in five patients (36%), and included: abdominal pain (three patients), nausea and vomiting (one patient), and oral candidiasis (one patient); no patient abandoned the treatment due to adverse effects. Conclusion. Rifabutin‐based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline.     

Fromilide (clarithromycin) in eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer]

The results of two treatment regimes of duodenal ulcer associated with Helicobacter pylori are presented. The patients of the group I were treated with omeprazole, fromilid (clarithromycin) and metronidazole, the patients of the group II were treated with omeprazole, fromilid (clarithromycin) and furazolidone for 7 days. Then patients of both groups were treated with omeprazole for two weeks. Duodenal ulcer healing was registered for all 10 patients in the group I and for 8 patients (of 10 patients) in the group II. Eradication of H. pylori according to rapid urease test and PCR was confirmed for 9 and 4 patients in the group I and for all 10 patients in the group II.     

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone in Brazil

Background. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with a wide range of digestive diseases and is very prevalent in developing countries, although few data exist on the susceptibility of H. pylori to antimicrobials commonly used in eradication schedules in these countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance of H. pylori to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone in dyspeptic Brazilian patients.
Material and Methods. Ninety consecutive H. pylori –positive patients were enrolled. Resistance was evaluated by an agar dilution test.
Results. Resistance to metronidazole was detected in 38 patients (42%); to amoxicillin in 26 individuals (29%); to clarithromycin in 6 patients (7%); to tetracycline in 6 patients (7%); and to furazolidone in 4 individuals (4%). Thirteen strains were resistant to two agents, and eight strains were resistant to three antimicrobials.
Conclusions. These results confirm the need for culture and susceptibility testing to define H. pylori resistance patterns in particular geographical areas before the general use of an eradication schedule. They also suggest the possibility of resistance to such antimicrobials as amoxicillin or tetracycline in geographical areas with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection and still not fully evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility.     

Alaska sentinel surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates from Alaska native persons, 1999-2003

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Alaska have demonstrated elevated proportions of antimicrobial resistance among Helicobacter pylori isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed H. pylori data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s sentinel surveillance in Alaska from July 1999 to June 2003 to determine the proportion of culture-positive biopsies from Alaska Native persons undergoing routine upper-endoscopy, and the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates to metronidazole [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of > 8 g metronidazole/mL), clarithromycin (MIC > or = 1), tetracycline (MIC > or = 2) and amoxicillin (MIC > or = 1)] using agar dilution. RESULTS: Nine-hundred sixty-four biopsy specimens were obtained from 687 participants; 352 (51%) patients tested culture positive. Mean age of both culture-positive and culture-negative patients was 51 years. Metronidazole resistance was demonstrated in isolates from 155 (44%) persons, clarithromycin resistance from 108 (31%) persons, amoxicillin resistance from 8 (2%) persons, and 0 for tetracycline resistance. Metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance varied by geographic region. Female patients were more likely than male subjects to show metronidazole resistance (p < .01) and clarithromycin resistance (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin is more common among H. pylori isolates from Alaska Native persons when compared with those from elsewhere in the USA.     

2-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is better than 1-week in clinical practice: a large prospective single-center randomized study

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies are considered the standard regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication, but the optimal duration of these regimens is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 1-week versus 2-week triple therapies in H. pylori-positive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 486 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and either amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. or metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 1 or 2 weeks. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and histology were performed at entry and 2 months after the end of therapy. H. pylori status was defined according to histology and urea breath test. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin achieved a significantly higher eradication rate than 1- or 2-week regimens with metronidazole (70% versus 52%, p = .003, versus 56%, p < .01) and the same therapy for 1-week (70% versus 57%, p = .05). At per-protocol analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin showed a significantly higher eradication rate than 1-week of amoxicillin and metronidazole (77% versus 62%; p = .03) but no difference with 1-week same regimen (66%) or 2-week metronidazole and clarithromycin regimen (72%). Compliance and tolerability were good for all regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Two-week therapies, independently of antibiotic combination, lead to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication rate compared to 1-week therapies, with same compliance and tolerability, even if, taking account of low-eradication rates, one must question whether the triple therapy should still be used.     

Quadruple therapy is effective for eradicating Helicobacter pylori after failure of triple proton-pump inhibitor-based therapy: a detailed, prospective analysis of 21 consecutive cases

Background. Data regarding the effectiveness of second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection are limited, especially if microbiological studies are considered.
Methods and Patients. We conducted a prospective, uncontrolled study of a consecutive series of 21 peptic ulcer patients with failure of 1-week lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. H. pylori status was evaluated by urease test, histology, culture, and urea breath test. Susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole was studied by E -test. Cure of infection was defined as negative results from endoscopy-based tests 1 month after treatment and negative results from a urea breath test at 2 months. Treatment consisted of a 1-week combination of lansoprazole (30 mg bid), tetracycline (500 mg qid), metronidazole (500 mg tid), and bismuth subcitrate (120 mg qid).
Results. H. pylori was resistant to metronidazole in three cases, to clarithromycin in three cases, and to both clarithromycin and metroinidazole in an additional three patients. No resistance to amoxicillin was found. Eradication was obtained in 20 cases (95.2% confidence interval [CI], 76.2–99.9). The only patient in whom infection was not eradicated harbored a metronidazole-resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration> 32 μg/ml) strain. No significant side effects were reported.
Conclusion. Quadruple therapy obtains a high eradication rate even in patients with clarithromycin- and metronidazole-resistant strains. Further randomized and controlled studies are warranted and are urgently needed.     

The Ideal Therapy Must Be Def ined in Each Geographical Area: Experience with a Quadruple Therapy in Spain

Background. Multiple therapeutic combinations have been tested to determine the optimal regimen(s) for Helicobacter pylori eradication, leading to very different results depending on the geographical area. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of a "quadruple" therapy with omeprazole, tetracycline, bismuth and metronidazole in our area.
Materials and Methods. We investigate 106 consecutive patients with active peptic ulcer disease (duodenal, gastric or both) and Helicobacter pylori infection. One-week therapy with omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg q.i.d., colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg q.i.d., and metronidazole 250 mg t.i.d was prescribed. Between the days 30 and 40 after treatment ended follow-up endoscopy was performed. Eradication was defined as both negative urease test and histology. Between days 90 and 360 a ¹³C urea breath test was performed in 100 patients.
Results. Of the 106 patients in the study, 91 had duodenal ulcer, 12 had gastric ulcer, and 3 had both. Side effects were observed in 25% of the cases. Eradication was achieved in 87.7% (93/106; CI 79.9–93.3). Healing was obtained in 95.2% (100/105; CI 89.2–98.4); 97.8% (CI 92.4–99.7) in those eradicated and 75% (CI 42.8–94.5) in non-eradicated ( p < .01).
Conclusions. Quadruple therapy with omeprazole, tetracycline, bismuth subcitrate and metronidazole achieves healing rates up to 95–100%. The 87.7% eradication rate obtained suggests that the regimen we used is a reasonable therapeutic alternative in our area.     

High Level of Antimicrobial Resistance in French Helicobacter pylori Isolates

Background:  Helicobacter pylori is a human pathogen responsible for serious diseases including peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. The recommended triple therapy included clarithromycin but increasing resistance has undermined its effectiveness. It is therefore important to be aware of the local prevalence of antimicrobial resistance to adjust treatment strategy.
Materials and Methods:  Overall, 530 biopsies were collected between 2004 and 2007. The antimicrobial susceptibility of H. pylori was determined by E-test and molecular methods.
Results:  Among these, 138/530 (26%) strains were resistant to clarithromycin, 324/530 (61%) to metronidazole and 70/530 (13.2%) to ciprofloxacin. Whereas no resistance against amoxicillin and tetracycline was observed, only one strain was resistant to rifampicin. Compared to the patients never treated for H. pylori infection, the prevalence of resistance was significantly higher in patients previously treated (19.1% vs 68% for clarithromycin; 13.2% vs 53.3% for both clarithromycin and metronidazole). The trend analysis revealed an increase of primary resistance to ciprofloxacin between 2004 and 2005 (7.3%) vs 2006–2007 (14.1%) ( p  = .04) and the secondary resistance reached 22.7% in 2007. Interestingly, 27 biopsies (19.6%) contained a double population of clarithromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains.
Conclusions:  The reported high prevalence of clarithromycin and multiple resistances of H. pylori suggest that the empiric therapy with clarithromycin should be abandoned as no longer pretreatment susceptibility testing has assessed the susceptibility of the strain. As culture and antibiogram are not routinely performable in most clinical laboratories, the use of molecular test should be developed to allow a wide availability of pretreatment susceptibility testing.     

An Increase in Helicobacter pylori Strains Resistant to Metronidazole: A Five-Year Study

Background. Metronidazole is one of the most commonly used antimicrobial agents for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Resistance to metronidazole has been reported worldwide but with a wide range of prevalence. We started using the classical triple therapy (bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) for H. pylori infection in 1991 but recently have experienced a decline in its efficacy in curing the infection. Thus our aim was to investigate in a single center the prevalence of metronidazole-resistant H. pylori over a period of 5 years.
Materials and Methods. A total of 1,015 different H. pylori strains collected over a period of 5 years were tested for sensitivity against metronidazole, ampicillin, tetracycline, and imipenem. Antibiotic sensitivity was tested by the disk diffusion and agar dilution methods. To elucidate further the possible relationship between these metronidazole-resistant strains, genomic DNA digestion by the Hae III endonuclease and ribotyping were undertaken in a selected group of isolates.
Results. In 1991, 29 of 132 (22.0%) tested strains of H. pylori were found to be resistant to metronidazole. Since our initiation at that time of a triple therapy of bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline, the prevalence of metronidazole-resistant strains rose rapidly to 73.2% in 1995. All H. pylori isolates were sensitive to ampicillin, tetracycline, and imipenem. A high degree of genomic heterogeneity was found among these isolates. Thus it is unlikely that the resistant strains of H. pylori were originated from a single clone.
Conclusions. This study shows a rapid increase in metronidazole-resistant H. pylori with the use of an anti- Helicobacter regimen that contains metronidazole. We anticipate that the efficacy of metronidazole-containing anti- Helicobacter regimens will decline with the rapid rise in resistant strains of H. pylori.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Seven-Day Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole for the Cure of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Short Report

Background To refine our understanding of anti- Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens further, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole given in combination with clarithromycin and metronidazole for 7 days in an open-label, multicenter study.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients self-administered lansoprazole, 30 mg; clarithromycin, 500 mg; and metronidazole, 500 mg bid for 7 days. Patients were assessed at pretreatment, at which time the presence of H. pylori was documented by rapid urease test or histology and culture, following study drug administration (week 1) for a brief evaluation only, and at least 4 weeks posttreatment (week 5), including endoscopy with collection of biopsy specimens for culture and histology testing.
Results. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 59 had confirmed H. pylori infection, and 51 were included in an intent-to-treat analysis of efficacy. Primary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance were observed in 84% and 8% of study patients, respectively. One month after the end of therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 40 of 51 patients (78%); 95% confidence interval, 65%–89%). The triple-therapy regimen was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients (4%) requiring premature withdrawal from the study due to treatment-related adverse events. Taste perversion (15.0%) and diarrhea (11.7%) were the most frequently reported adverse events possibly or probably related to study medication during the treatment period.
Conclusion. Despite a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, a 1-week, triple-drug combination of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole is effective treatment for and well-tolerated by patients with H. pylori infection.     

An Alternative Non-Macrolide, Non-Imidazole Treatment Regimen for Curing Helicobacter pylori and Duodenal Ulcers: Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate Plus Amoxicillin

Background. Because patients who fail to be cured of H. pylori infection following macrolide or imidazole therapy are difficult to treat, there is a clear need for a reasonably effective and simple second-line treatment regimen. The purpose of these two studies was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus amoxicillin for the cure of H. pylori infection and for healing duodenal ulcers and preventing ulcer relapse.
Materials and Methods. Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies were conducted in patients with an H. pylori -associated duodenal ulcer. Patients were treated with either RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks plus amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks, placebo bid for 4 weeks and amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, or placebo bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks. Patients with healed ulcers after 4 weeks of treatment were eligible for entry into a 24-week observation phase for the assessment of H. pylori status (culture, histology, and CLOtest^TM) and ulcer relapse.
Results. A total of 229 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection at baseline were evaluated. Of these, 132 whose ulcers had healed entered the 24-week posttreatment observation phase. The combination of RBC plus amoxicillin resulted in higher H. pylori cure rates (55%) and higher duodenal ulcer healing (74%) than did either treatment alone. All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusions. The combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin cures H. pylori infection in more than half of the patients treated. This treatment regimen shows promise as the basis for future non-macrolide, non-imidazole triple therapy regimens for curing H. pylori infection. Such regimens may be appropriate second-line treatment for patients who are resistant to or who are unable to tolerate macrolide- or imidazole-containing therapies.     

A prospective,randomized study of quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

Background and Aim. Failure of primary anti‐H. pylori therapy results in a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Here, we investigated the efficacy of high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy as salvage treatments for eradication of H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin. Patients and Methods. Patients with at least one treatment failure and infected with H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin, were randomized to receive either omeprazole 4 × 40 mg and amoxicillin 4 × 750 mg; or omeprazole 2 × 20 mg, bismuthcitrate 4 × 107 mg, metronidazole 4 × 500 mg and tetracycline 4 × 500 mg. Both regimens were given for 14 days. In cases of persistent infection, a cross‐over therapy was performed. Results. Eighty‐four patients were randomized. Cure of H. pylori infection was achieved in 31 patients after dual therapy and in 35 patients after quadruple therapy (per protocol: 83.8% (95% CI, 67.9–93.8) and 92.1% (95% CI, 78.6–98.3), respectively (p = 0.71); intention to treat: 75.6% (95% CI: 59.7–87.6) and 81.4% (95% CI: 66.6–91.6), respectively (p = 0.60)). Cross‐over therapy was performed in six of nine patients, four of whom were cured of the infection. Conclusion. Both high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy are effective in curing H. pylori infection resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin in patients who experienced previous treatment failures.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori does not reduce the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients on long-term NSAID treatment: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the major causes of gastroduodenal ulcers. Studies on the benefit of eradication of H. pylori in NSAID users yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term NSAIDs reduces the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers. METHODS: Patients on long-term NSAID treatment and who are H. pylori positive on serologic testing, were randomly assigned to either H. pylori eradication (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) or placebo. Primary endpoint was the presence of endoscopic gastric or duodenal ulcers 3 months after randomization. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five (48%) of a total of 347 patients were on gastroprotective medication. At endoscopy, gastroduodenal ulcers were diagnosed in 6 (4%) and 8 (5%) patients in the eradication and placebo group, respectively (p = .65). During follow-up of 12 months, no symptomatic ulcers or ulcer complications developed. No significant differences were found in the development of gastroduodenal erosions, dyspepsia, or in quality of life. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication therapy in patients on long-term NSAID treatment had no beneficial effect on the occurrence of ulcers, erosions, or dyspepsia. Ulcer rates in both study arms are remarkably low, in both patients with and without gastroprotective therapy.     

Long-term follow-up after eradication of Helicobacter pylori with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and tinidazole (OCT regimen) in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND: The long-term benefit of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment that includes metronidazole on peptic ulcer disease in Japan is unclear. We investigated the rate of H. pylori re-infection and ulcer relapse after H. pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 266 patients with endoscopically confirmed peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection were treated with triple therapy of omeprazole 40 mg (20 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin 800 mg (400 mg b.i.d.), and tinidazole 1000 mg (500 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days. Endoscopy with gastric biopsy was performed before and 1 month, 6 months, 1.5 years, and 3.5 years after therapy. H. pylori status was determined by H. pylori culture, rapid urease test, and histopathology. 13C-urea breath test was done at 6 months after eradication therapy. Treatment was deemed successful when all tests were negative at 6 months after therapy by endoscopic biopsy. RESULTS: Successful H. pylori eradication was achieved in 262/266 (98.5%) patients with peptic ulcer. Total relapse of peptic ulcer occurred in 8/262 (3%) patients after eradication, with 3/262 (1.1%) occurring within 1.5 years after treatment and 5/262 (1.9%) within 3.5 years. All relapsed patients were found to be H. pylori-positive at the time of relapse. Of the 262 patients who experienced eradication, 20 (7.6%) were subsequently re-infected, six (2.3%) within 1.5 years and 14 (5.3%) within 3.5 years. CONCLUSION: Triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and tinidazole (OCT) is useful for H. pylori eradication in Japan, but there is an appreciable re-infection rate in this population.