An insight into the inhibitory selectivity of 4-(Pyrazol- 4-yl)-pyrimidines to CDK4 over CDK2

Revealing selectivity mechanism of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and their inhibitors is an important issue to develop potential anticancer drugs. The substituted 4-(Pyrazol-4-yl)-pyrimidines are potent inhibitors of CDK4 but not of the highly homologous CDK2. In order to reveal the inhibitory selectivity of these inhibitors to CDK4 over CDK2, we select one of substituted 4-(Pyrazol-4-yl)-pyrimidines as a representative (marked as A1 hereunder) and perform molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy analysis for CDK4/A1 and CDK2/A1, respectively. The electrostatic and van der Waals (vdW) interactions of the A1 inhibitor with CDK4/CDK2 are discussed. The computed binding free energies based on the MM-PBSA method are consistent with experimental bioactivity ranking of A1 inhibitor to CDK4/CDK2. On the other hand, the conformational characteristics of CDK2 and CDK4 induced by A1 inhibitor are analysed and revealed. Results demonstrate that the vdW interactions considerably contribute to binding of CDK4/CDK2 with A1 inhibitor and are similar in size. The hydrogen bonding between A1 inhibitor and CDK4/CDK2 is considerably favourable to the binding, in which the hydrogen bond between the NH group of the pyrazole group of A1 and the residue Asp158 of CDK4 plays a crucial role in inhibitory selectivity of A1 inhibitor to CDK4 over CDK2. The electrostatic interaction energy differences between the corresponding residues of CDK4/A1 and CDK2/A1 confirm the above inference. The conformational changes of CDK2 and CDK4 induced by A1 inhibitor influence the selectivity of A1 inhibitor to CDK4/CDK2.     

Loss of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) inhibitory phosphorylation in a CDK2AF knock-in mouse causes misregulation of DNA replication and centrosome duplication

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) inhibitory phosphorylation controls the onset of mitosis and is essential for the checkpoint pathways that prevent the G(2)- to M-phase transition in cells with unreplicated or damaged DNA. To address whether CDK2 inhibitory phosphorylation plays a similar role in cell cycle regulation and checkpoint responses at the start of the S phase, we constructed a mouse strain in which the two CDK2 inhibitory phosphorylation sites, threonine 14 and tyrosine 15, were changed to alanine and phenylalanine, respectively (CDK2AF). This approach showed that inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK2 had a major role in controlling cyclin E-associated kinase activity and thus both determined the timing of DNA replication in a normal cell cycle and regulated centrosome duplication. Further, DNA damage in G(1) CDK2AF cells did not downregulate cyclin E-CDK2 activity when the CDK inhibitor p21 was also knocked down. We were surprised to find that this was insufficient to cause cells to bypass the checkpoint and enter the S phase. This led to the discovery of two previously unrecognized pathways that control the activity of cyclin A at the G(1) DNA damage checkpoint and may thereby prevent S-phase entry even when cyclin E-CDK2 activity is deregulated.     

Caco-2 intestinal cell differentiation is associated with G1 arrest and suppression of CDK2 and CDK4

The cellular mechanisms regulating intestinal proliferation anddifferentiation remain largely undefined. Previously, we showed anearly induction of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21^Waf1/Cip1 in Caco-2 cells, ahuman colon cancer line that spontaneously differentiates into a smallbowel phenotype. The purpose of our present study was to assess thetiming of cell cycle arrest in relation to differentiation in Caco-2cells and to examine the mechanisms responsible for CDK inactivation.Caco-2 cells undergo a relativeG₁/S block and cease toproliferate at day3 postconfluency; an increase in theactivity of terminally differentiated brush-border enzymes (sucrase andalkaline phosphatase) was noted at day6 postconfluency. Cell cycle block wasassociated with suppression of both CDK2 and CDK4 activities, which areimportant for G₁/S progression.Treatment of the CDK immune complexes with the detergent deoxycholate(DOC) resulted in restoration of CDK2, but not CDK4, activity atday 3 postconfluency, suggesting the presence of inhibitory protein(s)binding to the cyclin/CDK2 complex at this time point. An increasedbinding of p21^Waf1/Cip1 to CDK2complexes at day3 postconfluency was noted, suggesting a potential role for p21^Waf1/Cip1in CDK2 inactivation; however, immunodepletion ofp21^Waf1/Cip1 from Caco-2 proteinextracts demonstrated thatp21^Waf1/Cip1 is only partiallyresponsible for CDK2 suppression atday 3 postconfluency. A decrease in the cyclin E/CDK2 complex appears tocontribute to the CDK2 inactivation noted atdays6 and12 postconfluency. Taken together, ourresults suggest that multiple mechanisms contribute to CDK suppressionduring Caco-2 cell differentiation. Inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4 leadsto G₁ arrest and inhibition ofproliferation that precede Caco-2 cell differentiation.

     

Critical reanalysis of the methods that discriminate the activity of CDK2 from CDK1

Cyclin dependent kinases 1 and 2 (CDK1 and CDK2) play crucial roles in regulating cell cycle progression from G1 to S, through S, and G2 to M phase. Both inhibition and aberrant activation of CDK1/2 can be detrimental to cancer cell growth. However, the tools routinely employed to discriminate between the activities of these 2 kinases do not have the selectivity commonly attributed to them. Activation of these kinases is often assayed as a decrease of the inhibitory tyrosine-15 phosphorylation, yet the antibodies used cannot discriminate between phosphorylated CDK1 and CDK2. Inhibitors of these kinases, while partially selective against purified kinases, may lack selectivity when applied to intact cells. High levels of cyclin E are often considered a marker of increased CDK2 activity, yet active CDK2 targets cyclin E for degradation, hence high levels usually reflect inactive CDK2. Finally, inhibition of CDK2 does not arrest cells in S phase suggesting CDK2 is not required for S phase progression. Furthermore, activation of CDK2 in S phase can rapidly induce DNA double-strand breaks in some cell lines. The misunderstandings associated with the use of these tools has led to misinterpretation of results. In this review, we highlight these challenges in the field.     

Crystallographic approach to identification of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)-specific inhibitors by using CDK4 mimic CDK2 protein

Genetic alteration of one or more components of the p16(INK4A)-CDK4,6/cyclin D-retinoblastoma pathway is found in more than half of all human cancers. Therefore, CDK4 is an attractive target for the development of a novel anticancer agent. However, it is difficult to make CDK4-specific inhibitors that do not possess activity for other kinases, especially CDK2, because the CDK family has high structural homology. The three-dimensional structure of CDK2, particularly that bound with the inhibitor, has provided useful information for the synthesis of CDK2-specific inhibitors. The same approach used to make CDK4-specific inhibitors was hindered by the failure to obtain a crystal structure of CDK4. To overcome this problem, we synthesized a CDK4 mimic CDK2 protein in which the ATP binding pocket of CDK2 was replaced with that of CDK4. This CDK4 mimic CDK2 was crystallized both in the free and inhibitor-bound form. The structural information thus obtained was found to be useful for synthesis of a CDK4-specific inhibitor that does not have substantial CDK2 activity. Namely, the data suggest that CDK4 has additional space that will accommodate a large substituent such as the CDK4 selective inhibitor. Inhibitors designed to bind into this large cavity should be selective for CDK4 without having substantial CDK2 activity. This design principle was confirmed in the x-ray crystal structure of the CDK4 mimic CDK2 with a new CDK4 selective inhibitor bound.     

Differential contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 for unperturbed cell cycle control and DNA integrity checkpoints

Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) by Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation is critical for normal cell cycle progression and is a converging event for several cell cycle checkpoints. In this study, we compared the relative contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation for cyclin A/B1-CDC2 and cyclin A/E-CDK2 complexes. We found that inhibitory phosphorylation plays a major role in the regulation of CDC2 but only a minor role for CDK2 during the unperturbed cell cycle of HeLa cells. The relative importance of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 may reflect their distinct cellular functions. Despite this, expression of nonphosphorylation mutants of both CDC2 and CDK2 triggered unscheduled histone H3 phosphorylation early in the cell cycle and was cytotoxic. DNA damage by a radiomimetic drug or replication block by hydroxyurea stimulated a buildup of cyclin B1 but was accompanied by an increase of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2. After DNA damage and replication block, all cyclin-CDK pairs that control S phase and mitosis were to different degrees inhibited by phosphorylation. Ectopic expression of nonphosphorylated CDC2 stimulated DNA replication, histone H3 phosphorylation, and cell division even after DNA damage. Similarly, a nonphosphorylation mutant of CDK2, but not CDK4, disrupted the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. Finally, CDC25A, CDC25B, a dominant-negative CHK1, but not CDC25C or a dominant-negative WEE1, stimulated histone H3 phosphorylation after DNA damage. These data suggest differential contributions for the various regulators of Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation in normal cell cycle and during the DNA damage checkpoint.     

Development of newly synthesised quinazolinone-based CDK2 inhibitors with potent efficacy against melanoma

Inhibiting Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) has been established as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of many cancers. Accordingly, this study aimed at developing a new set of quinazolinone-based derivatives as CDK2 inhibitors. The new compounds were evaluated for their anticancer activity against sixty tumour cell lines. Compounds 5c and 8a showed excellent growth inhibition against the melanoma cell line MDA-MB-435 with GI% of 94.53 and 94.15, respectively. Cell cycle analysis showed that compound 5c led to cell cycle cessation at S phase and G2/M phase revealing that CDK2 could be the plausible biological target. Thus, the most cytotoxic candidates 5c and 8a were evaluated in vitro for their CDK2 inhibitory activity and were able to display significant inhibitory action. The molecular docking study confirmed the obtained results. ADME study predicted that 5c had appropriate drug-likeness properties. These findings highlight a rationale for further development and optimisation of novel CDK2 inhibitors.     

Synthesis of 6-(het) ary Xylocydine analogues and evaluating their inhibitory activities of CDK1 and CDK2 in vitro

A series of purine nucleoside analogues bearing an aryl and hetaryl group in position 6 were prepared and their biological activities were assessed by in vitro CDK1/Cyclin B1 and CDK2/Cyclin A2 kinase assay. From the synthesized chemicals, three Xylocydine derivatives 3h, 3i, and 3j exhibited specific inhibitory activities on CDK2/Cyclin A2 with IC(50) values of 4.6, 4.8, and 55 μM, respectively. Those three compounds all induced G1/S phase arrest in Human epithelial carcinoma cell line (HeLa), and the results suggested they may inhibit CDK2 activity in vitro. Furthermore, molecular modeling study, their docking into Cyclin Dependant Kinase 2 (CDK2) active site showed high docking scores. Taken together, these data suggest that, those three compounds are good inhibitors of CDK2 for studying this kinase signal transduction pathway in cell system.     

CDK2 regulation through PI3K and CDK4 is necessary for cell cycle progression of primary rat hepatocytes

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Cell cycle progression is driven by the coordinated regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). In response to mitogenic stimuli, CDK4 and CDK2 form complexes with cyclins D and E, respectively, and translocate to the nucleus in the late G(1) phase. It is an on-going discussion whether mammalian cells need both CDK4 and CDK2 kinase activities for induction of S phase. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we have explored the role of CDK4 activity during G(1) progression of primary rat hepatocytes. We found that CDK4 activity was restricted by either inhibiting growth factor induced cyclin D1-induction with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, or by transient transfection with a dominant negative CDK4 mutant. In both cases, we observed reduced CDK2 nuclear translocation and reduced CDK2-Thr160 phosphorylation. Furthermore, reduced pRb hyperphosphorylation and reduced cellular proliferation were observed. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 alone was not sufficient to induce CDK4 nuclear translocation, CDK2 activity or cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, epidermal growth factor-induced CDK4 activity was necessary for CDK2 activation and for hepatocyte proliferation. These results also suggest that, in addition to regulating cyclin D1 expression, PI3K is involved in regulation of nuclear shuttling of cyclin-CDK complexes in G(1) phase.     

Targeting Conformational Activation of CDK2 Kinase

Cyclin‐dependent kinases constitute attractive pharmacological targets for cancer therapeutics, yet inhibitors in clinical trials target the ATP‐binding pocket of the CDK and therefore suffer from limited selectivity and emergence of resistance. The more recent development of allosteric inhibitors targeting conformational plasticity of protein kinases offers promising perspectives for therapeutics. In particular tampering with T‐loop dynamics of CDK2 kinase would provide a selective means of inhibiting this kinase, by preventing its conformational activation. To this aim we engineered a fluorescent biosensor that specifically reports on conformational changes of CDK2 activation loop and is insensitive to ATP or ATP‐competitive inhibitors, which constitutes a highly sensitive probe for identification of selective T‐loop modulators. This biosensor was successfully applied to screen a library of small chemical compounds leading to discovery of a family of quinacridine analogs, which potently inhibit cancer cell proliferation, and promote accumulation of cells in S phase and G2. These compounds bind CDK2/ Cyclin A, inhibit its kinase activity, compete with substrate binding, but not with ATP, and dock onto the T‐loop of CDK2. The best compound also binds CDK4 and CDK4/Cyclin D1, but not CDK1. The strategy we describe opens new doors for the discovery of a new class of allosteric CDK inhibitors for cancer therapeutics.     

Different mechanisms of CDK5 and CDK2 activation as revealed by CDK5/p25 and CDK2/cyclin A dynamics

A detailed analysis is presented of the dynamics of human CDK5 in complexes with the protein activator p25 and the purine-like inhibitor roscovitine. These and other findings related to the activation of CDK5 are critically reviewed from a molecular perspective. In addition, the results obtained on the behavior of CDK5 are compared with data on CDK2 to assess the differences and similarities between the two kinases in terms of (i) roscovitine binding, (ii) regulatory subunit association, (iii) conformational changes in the T-loop following CDK/regulatory subunit complex formation, and (iv) specificity in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. An energy decomposition analysis, used for these purposes, revealed why the binding of p25 alone is sufficient to stabilize the extended active T-loop conformation of CDK5, whereas the equivalent conformational change in CDK2 requires both the binding of cyclin A and phosphorylation of the Thr(160) residue. The interaction energy of the CDK5 T-loop with p25 is about 26 kcal.mol(-1) greater than that of the CDK2 T-loop with cyclin A. The binding pattern between CDK5 and p25 was compared with that of CDK2/cyclin A to find specific regions involved in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. The analyses performed revealed that the alphaNT-helix of cyclin A interacts with the alpha6-alpha7 loop and the alpha7 helix of CDK2, but these regions do not interact in the CDK5/p25 complex. Further differences between the CDK5/p25 and CDK2/cyclin A systems studied are discussed with respect to their specific functionality.     

共转染CDK1、CDK2siRNA对肿瘤细胞周期和细胞凋亡的影响

目的研究共转染CDK1、CDK2siRNA同时抑制CDKI、CDK2蛋白表达对肿瘤细胞周期和细胞凋亡的影响,探讨细胞周期主要调控分子在肿瘤细胞凋亡中的作用。方法以人宫颈癌细胞株HeLa细胞为研究对象,用脂质体lipofectamine2000同时转染CDKl和CDK2siRNA。在转染后48、60h收集细胞,用Western印迹检测CDKl、CDK2蛋白的表达,AnnexinV／PI检测转染细胞的凋亡,流式细胞术DNA含量检测分析细胞周期。转染细胞进行瑞氏一姬姆萨染色（Wright—Giemsa）后在显微镜下观察其形态变化i结果共转染CDKl、CDK2siRNA后48和60h,Western印迹结果显示CDKl和CDK2蛋白的表达都同时降低。共转染CDKl、CDK2siRNA后,细胞周期S期和G1／M期比例与对照相比有明显增加;共转染细胞经瑞氏一姬姆萨染色后在显微镜下可见双核或多核细胞增多;AnnexinV／PI检测结果显示共转染CDK1、CDK2siRNA的细胞在48和60h细胞凋亡率与对照相比有显著的升高。结论siRNA干扰导致的CDKI、CDK2表达同时降低不仅导致细胞周期s期和G1／M期的阻滞,也诱导了肿瘤细胞的凋亡。     

Cell cycle regulation of CDK2 activity by phosphorylation of Thr160 and Tyr15.

We have examined the role of phosphorylation in the regulation of human cyclin-dependent kinase-2 (CDK2), a protein closely related to the cell cycle regulatory kinase CDC2. We find that CDK2 from HeLa cells contains three major tryptic phosphopeptides. Analysis of site-directed mutant proteins, expressed by transient transfection of COS cells, demonstrates that the two major phosphorylation sites are Tyr15 (Y15) and Thr160 (T160). Additional phosphorylation probably occurs on Thr14 (T14). Replacement of T160 with alanine abolishes the kinase activity of CDK2, indicating that phosphorylation at this site (as in CDC2) is required for kinase activity. Mutation of Y15 and T14 stimulates kinase activity, demonstrating that phosphorylation at these sites (as in CDC2) is inhibitory. Similarly, CDK2 is activated in vitro by dephosphorylation of Y15 and T14 by the phosphatase CDC25. Analysis of HeLa cells synchronized at various cell cycle stages indicates that CDK2 phosphorylation on T160 increases during S phase and G2, when CDK2 is most active. Phosphorylation on the inhibitory sites T14 and Y15 is also maximal during S phase and G2. Thus, the activity of a subpopulation of CDK2 molecules is inhibited at a time in the cell cycle when overall CDK2 activity is increased.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5,6-dihydropyrimido[4,5-f]quinazoline derivatives as potent CDK2 inhibitors

As serine/threonine kinase, the cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a promising target for various diseases such as cerebral hypoxia, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. Here we reported the structure-based synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5,6-dihydropyrimido[4,5-f]quinazoline derivatives as CDK2 inhibitors, which exhibited potent CDK2 inhibitory activities, as well as anticancer activities in low concentration against two human cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and HCT116). In particular, compounds 11a and 11f (IC₅₀ values of 0.11 and 0.09?μM for CDK2, respectively) have demonstrated significantly inhibitory potency against CDK2 and have showed great inhibitory activities against MCF-7 and HCT116 cell lines.     

Design and synthesis of quinolin-2(1H)-one derivatives as potent CDK5 inhibitors

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) is a serine/threonine protein kinase and its deregulation is implicated in a number of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and ischemic stroke. Using active site homology modeling between CDK5 and CDK2, we explored several different chemical series of potent CDK5 inhibitors. In this report, we describe the design, synthesis, and CDK5 inhibitory activities of quinolin-2(1H)-one derivatives.     

Synthesis of potent oxindole CDK2 inhibitors

A series of oxindole CDK2 inhibitors was synthesized. These novel analogues have a saturated monosubstituted cyclic moiety at their C-4 position that mimics the ribofuranoside of ATP. This substitution afforded agents with increased potency relative to the parent indolinone and nanomolar range IC(50) against the CDK2 enzyme and two cancer cell lines.     

胃癌中CDK1和CDK2的表达及预后意义

目的探讨胃癌中CDK1和CDK2的表达情况及预后意义。方法应用免疫组化S-P法对48例各期胃癌和癌旁正常组织中CDK1和CDK2的表达情况进行检测。结果早期胃癌中CDK1和CDK2中表达较低(P0.05),进展期胃癌中表达更高(P0.05)。结论CDK1和CDK2可望成为胃癌早期预后指标和分子治疗的靶标。