Sequence-Dependent Upstream DNA-RNA Polymerase Interactions in the Open Complex with λPR and λPRM Promoters and Implications for the Mechanism of Promoter Interference

Upstream interactions of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) in an open promoter complex (RPo) formed at the P_R and P_RM promoters of bacteriophage λ have been studied by atomic force microscopy. We demonstrate that the previously described 30-nm DNA compaction observed upon RPo formation at P_R [Rivetti, C., Guthold, M. & Bustamante, C. (1999). Wrapping of DNA around the E. coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex. EMBO J., 18, 4464-4475.] is a consequence of the specific interaction of the RNAP with two AT-rich sequence determinants positioned from − 36 to − 59 and from − 80 to − 100. Likewise, RPos formed at P_RM showed a specific contact between RNAP and the upstream DNA sequence. We further demonstrate that this interaction, which results in DNA wrapping against the polymerase surface, is mediated by the C-terminal domains of α-subunits (carboxy-terminal domain). Substitution of these AT-rich sequences with heterologous DNA reduces DNA wrapping but has only a small effect on the activity of the P_R promoter. We find, however, that the frequency of DNA templates with both P_R and P_RM occupied by an RNAP significantly increases upon loss of DNA wrapping. These results suggest that α carboxy-terminal domain interactions with upstream DNA can also play a role in regulating the expression of closely spaced promoters. Finally, a model for a possible mechanism of promoter interference between P_R and P_RM is proposed.     

How Escherichia coli RNA polymerase can negatively regulate transcription from a constitutive promoter

We previously described the structures and functions of specific complexes between the bla promoter from Tn3 (present in pBR322) and RNA polymerase (RNAP), showing that, at excess RNAP, complexes can form in which one or two RNAPs bind to the same promoter (1:1 and 2:1 complexes) (Duval-Valentin and Ehrlich, 1988). We report here that the 2:1 complex cannot be detected below 25 degrees C; above that temperature, a 1:1 complex forms at a rate one order of magnitude faster than that of the 2:1 complex, and above 30 degrees C, the amounts of both species become equal for RNAP/promoter ratio r30 less than or equal to r less than or equal to 70. The 2:1 complex decays back to a 1:1 complex losing the last RNAP at a rate about three times that of the 1:1 complex decay. Functional assays of the complexes formed at excess RNAP show that both 1:1 and 2:1 complexes are immediately and permanently inhibited, even when the promoters are pre-incubated with ribonucleotide selections potentially enabling entrance into abortive cycling or formation of a stressed complex. We conclude that the inhibition step probably takes place in the complex formation pathway between RPi and RPo, at a novel stable intermediate isomer, RPj, formed above 25 degrees C. A possible mechanism of formation of the 2:1 complex is outlined. In vivo studies, in which r was modified by varying the bacterial growth rate, show a reduction of bla expression as r values are upshifted, specific to the bla promoter from Tn3.