On the Roles of Heterochromatin and Euchromatin in Meiosis in Drosophila: Mapping Chromosomal Pairing Sites and Testing Candidate Mutations for Effects on X–Y Nondisjunction and Meiotic Drive in Male Meiosis

Mapping of pairing sites involved in meiotic homolog disjunction in Drosophilahas led to conflicting hypotheses about the nature of such sites and the role of heterochromatin in meiotic pairing. In the female-specific distributive system, pairing regions appear to be exclusively heterochromatic and map to broad regions encompassing many different sequences. In male meiosis, autosomal pairing sites appear to be distributed broadly within euchromatin but to be absent from heterochromatin, whereas the X-pairing site maps in the centric heterochromatin. The X site has been shown to coincide with the intergenic spacer (IGS) repeats within the rDNA arrays shared between the X and Y. It has not been clear whether the heterochromatic location of this pairing site has any significance. A novel assay for genic modifiers of X–Y chromosome pairing was developed based on the intermediate nondisjunction levels observed in males whose X chromosome lacks the native pairing site but contains two transgenic insertions of single rDNA genes. This assay was used to test several mutations in Su(var)(Suppressor of position effect variegation), PcG(Polycomb-Group) recombination defective, and repair-defective genes. No strong effects on disjunction were seen. However, the tests did uncover several mutations that suppress or enhance the meiotic drive (distorted X-Y recovery ratio) that accompanies X–Y pairing failure. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

X-4 Translocations and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males: Role of Sex Chromosome Pairing

Males carrying certain X-4 translocations exhibit strongly skewed sperm recovery ratios. The X^P4^D half of the translocation disjoins regularly from the Y chromosome and the 4^PX^D half disjoins regularly from the normal 4. Yet the smaller member of each bivalent is recovered in excess of its pairing partner, apparently due to differential gametic lethality. Chromosome recovery probabilities are multiplicative; the viability of each genotype is the product of the recovery probability of its component chromosomes. Meiotic drive can also be caused by deficiency for X heterochromatin. In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males show the same size dependent chromosome recoveries and multiplicative recovery probabilities found in T(1;4)B^S males. Meiotic drive in In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males has been shown to be due to X-Y pairing failure. Although pairing is regular in the T(X;4) males, the striking phenotypic parallels suggest a common explanation. The experiments described below show that the two phenomena are, in fact, one and the same. X-4 translocations are shown to have the same effect on recovery of independently assorting chromosomes as does In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R. Addition of pairing sites to the 4^PX^D half of the translocation eliminates drive. A common explanation—failure of the distal euchromatic portion of the X chromosome to participate in X:Y meiotic pairing—is suggested as the cause for drive. The effect of X chromosome breakpoint on X-4 translocation induced meiotic drive is investigated. It is found that translocations with breakpoints distal to 13C on the salivary map do not cause drive while translocations broken proximal to 13C cause drive. The level of drive is related to the position of the breakpoint—the more proximal the breakpoint the greater the drive.     

Male sterility and meiotic drive associated with sex chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila. Role of X-Y pairing.

In Drosophila melanogaster, deletions of the pericentromeric X heterochromatin cause X-Y nondisjunction, reduced male fertility and distorted sperm recovery ratios (meiotic drive) in combination with a normal Y chromosome and interact with Y-autosome translocations (T(Y;A)) to cause complete male sterility. The pericentromeric heterochromatin has been shown to contain the male-specific X-Y meiotic pairing sites, which consist mostly of a 240-bp repeated sequence in the intergenic spacers (IGS) of the rDNA repeats. The experiments in this paper address the relationship between X-Y pairing failure and the meiotic drive and sterility effects of Xh deletions. X-linked insertions either of complete rDNA repeats or of rDNA fragments that contain the IGS were found to suppress X-Y nondisjunction and meiotic drive in Xh-/Y males, and to restore fertility to Xh-/T(Y;A) males for eight of nine tested Y-autosome translocations. rDNA fragments devoid of IGS repeats proved incapable of suppressing either meiotic drive or chromosomal sterility. These results indicate that the various spermatogenic disruptions associated with X heterochromatic deletions are all consequences of X-Y pairing failure. We interpret these findings in terms of a novel model in which misalignment of chromosomes triggers a checkpoint that acts by disabling the spermatids that derive from affected spermatocytes.     

Genetic dissection of heterochromatin in Drosophila: The role of basal X heterochromatin in meiotic sex chromosome behaviour

We have examined the female meiotic behaviour of three X chromosomes which have large deletions of the basal heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster. We find that most of this heterochromatin can be removed without substantially altering pairing and segregation of the two Xs. To compare the role of heterochromatin in male meiosis we have constructed individuals which carry two extra identical heterochromatic mini X chromosomes. These minis behave as univalents even though their heterochromatin is known to contain satellite DNA. We conclude therefore that this satellite DNA is not sufficient to allow effectively normal meiotic behaviour. In all other respects our results in the male extend and confirm Cooper's postulate that there exist specific pairing sites in the X heterochromatin. Thus we find no support in either female or male meiosis for the concept that satellite DNA is involved in meiotic chromosome pairing of either a chiasmate or an achiasmate kind.     

Homolog pairing and sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> male meiosis I

Drosophila males undergo meiosis without recombination or chiasmata but homologous chromosomes pair and disjoin regularly. The X–Y pair utilizes a specific repeated sequence within the heterochromatic ribosomal DNA blocks as a pairing site. No pairing sites have yet been identified for the autosomes. To search for such sites, we utilized probes targeting specific heterochromatic regions to assay heterochromatin pairing sequences and behavior in meiosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We found that the small fourth chromosome pairs at heterochromatic region 61 and associates with the X chromosome throughout prophase I. Homolog pairing of the fourth chromosome is disrupted when the homolog conjunction complex is perturbed by mutations in SNM or MNM. On the other hand, six tested heterochromatic regions of the major autosomes proved to be largely unpaired after early prophase I, suggesting that stable homolog pairing sites do not exist in heterochromatin of the major autosomes. Furthermore, FISH analysis revealed two distinct patterns of sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin: regions with stable cohesion and regions lacking cohesion. This suggests that meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is incomplete within heterochromatin and may occur at specific preferential sites.     

Cytological observations on mitotic and meiotic pairing in males ofDrosophila melanogaster withIn(1)sc 4 sc 8

A cytological study has been carried out on the pairing of the XY chromosomes in somatic cells and in spermatocytes of larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster. Two strains have been studied: one a control strain and the other a carrier of theIn(1)sc ⁴ sc ⁸ inversion on the X chromosome. The data obtained seem to indicate that the absence of the greater region of homology between XY, caused by the presence of theIn(1)sc ⁴ sc ⁸ inversion, results in an approximately equal reduction in the frequencies of mitotic and meiotic pairing of XY. The short arm of the Y chromosome shows marked differences in the pairing with the X chromosome, compared with the control, whereas the long arm shows no variations.     

The influence of heterochromatin, inversion-heterozygosity and somatic pairing on x-ray induced mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Mitotic recombination has been induced with X-rays in Drosophila melanogaster larvae and assayed later as twin mosaic spots in the adult eyes. When the X-chromosomes are marked with zeste and white and the third chromosomes with roughoid and sepia, the frequency of twin spots was about 20 times higher for the X-chromosome than for the third chromosome. The greater amount of heterochromatin in the X-chromosome was considered responsible for the difference.Experiments with different inversion heterozygotes support this interpretation. Euchromatic inversions of different lengths have, when heterozygous, little or no influence on the twin spot frequency. The shorter the heterochromatic segment between the kinetochore and the proxomal break point of the inversion the stronger is the reduction of the twin spot frequency.The heterozygotes for the long sc ⁸ and sc ^S1 inversions gave exceptionally low twin spot frequencies. It seems possible that potential twin spot daughter cells die after recombination because of genetic imbalance and/or lack of proper cell separation resulting from the persistence of the dikinetic chromosome elements.To test whether inaccurate somatic pairing in inversion heterozygotes could help explain the low twin spot frequencies in those of sc ⁸ and sc ^S1, neuroblast chromosomes were investigated. They show that chromosomal arrangement during metaphase is determined exclusively by the location of the kinetochore, which always points, irrespective of earlier somatic pairing, toward the center of the metaphase plate. It is possible that there is a lack of proper chromosome alignment at the X-ray sensitive stage for mitotic recombination.     

There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females,one of which requires heterochromatic homology

There are numerous examples of the regular segregation of achiasmate chromosomes at meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Classically, the choice of achiasmate segregational partners has been thought to be independent of homology, but rather made on the basis of availability or similarities in size and shape. To the contrary, we show here that heterochromatic homology plays a primary role in ensuring the proper segregation of achiasmate homologs. We observe that the heterochromatin of chromosome 4 functions as, or contains, a meiotic pairing site. We show that free duplications carrying the 4th chromosome pericentric heterochromatin induce high frequencies of 4th chromosome nondisjunction regardless of their size. Moreover, a duplication from which some of the 4th chromosome heterochromatin has been removed is unable to induce 4th chromosome nondisjunction. Similarly, in the absence of either euchromatic homology or a size similarity, duplications bearing the X chromosome heterochromatin also disrupt the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosome centromeres. Although heterochromatic regions are sufficient to conjoin nonexchange homologues, we confirm that the segregation of heterologous chromosomes is determined by size, shape, and availability. The meiotic mutation Axs differentiates between these two processes of achiasmate centromere coorientation by disrupting only the homology-dependent mechanism. Thus there are two different mechanisms by which achiasmate segregational partners are chosen. We propose that the absence of diplotene-diakinesis during female meiosis allows heterochromatic pairings to persist until prometaphase and thus to co-orient homologous centromeres. We also propose that heterologous disjunctions result from a separate and homology-independent process that likely occurs during prometaphase. The latter process, which may not require the physical association of segregational partners, is similar to those observed in many insects, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in C. elegans males. We also suggest that the physical basis of this process may reflect known properties of the Drosophila meiotic spindle. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Fertile male mice with three sex chromosomes: Evidence that infertility in XYY male mice is an effect of two Y chromosomes

In the mouse XYY males are sterile, presumably because pairing abnormalities resulting from the presence of three sex chromosomes lead to meiotic breakdown. We have produced male mice, designated XYY^*X, that have three sex chromosome pairing regions but only one intact Y chromosome. Unexpectedly XYY^*X males are fertile, although they are no more efficient in sex chromosome pairing than previously reported XYY males. We conclude that the sterility of XYY males is caused by a combination of the deleterious effect of two Y chromosomes, presumably acting prior to meiosis, and pairing abnormalities resulting in significant meiotic disruption.by P.B. Moens     

Mitotic and meiotic analysis of a pericentric inversion associated with a tandem duplication in Eleutherine bulbosa

The mitotic and meiotic chromosomes of five populations of Eleutherine bulbosa were analysed after C-banding and fluorochrome (DAPI/CMA) staining. All individuals showed heterozygosity in pair number I for a pericentric inversion and a tandem duplication in the inverted region of one of the homologues. The duplication comprised the secondary constriction and ca. 40% of its associated CMA⁺ heterochromatin. All the secondary constrictions were nucleolar organizers, but the repeated one seemed to be the most active. The inverted segment constituted ca. 70% of the chromosome length and included, in addition to the duplication and the centromere, two DAPI⁺ C-bands. These markers, especially the CMA⁺ blocks which were unique in the complement, permitted a detailed analysis of meiotic pairing. In practically all examples of late zygotene the CMA blocks were paired, which seems to mean that non-homologous pairing never occurred. At this stage the duplicated CMA⁺ block was clearly unpaired. At pachytene-diplotene the inverted region formed a typical loop without chiasmata. Although male meiosis was normal, no indication of sexual reproduction was found. A causal relationship between duplication, inversion and asexual reproduction is proposed to explain the maintenance of the heterozygosity.     

Some genetic aspects of meiosis in males of Drosophila melanogaster,carriers of In(1)sc 4 sc 8

In order to verify the theory of non-homologous pairing in the male meiotic metaphase of Drosophila melanogaster, particular crosses were carried out with In(1)sc ⁴ sc ⁸ males, with or without the inversion In(2)SM ₅, Cy on the second chromosome. The results seem to indicate the existence of the above mechanisms, which would appear to contribute, not infrequently, to the overall non-disjunction of the In(1)sc ⁴ sc ⁸+Cy males.The work has been financially supported by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR).     

Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster

Chromosome pairing during meiosis I in D. melanogaster males was investigated ultrastructurally by examining complete bivalents in electron micrographs of serial thin sections. The XY bivalent is characterized by the presence of unique material located between the two half-bivalents at the site of synapsis. The material has a fibrillar appearance and is less electron dense than the surrounding chromatin. YY bivalents in XYY males and XY bivalents containing the X chromosome, In(1)sc ^4Lsc^8R, where the pairing sites of the X chromosome are inverted and partially deleted also possess this material. The material is not associated with autosomal bivalents and may represent a morphological manifestation of the hypothetical cohesive elements (collochores) which are thought to function in conjunction of the X and Y chromosomes (Cooper, 1964).     

Spermatogonial exchange involving the X but not the y chromosome inDrosophila Melanogaster

Summary The distal uninverted portion of In(1)sc⁸, which carriesy ⁺ andac ⁺, is occasionally lost during spermatogonial divisions. This is accomplished by exchange between the protion of the proximal heterochromatin that has been removed distally by the inversion and some other heterochromatin in the complement (see alsoLindsley 1955b).. The majority of the recombiants recovered from males carrying In(1)sc⁸ arise through exchange with the Y chromosome (12/15). The majority of the recombinants recovered from males carring In(1)sc^8L, EN^R, which is characterized by a heterochromatic second arm, do not arise through exchange with the Y chromosome (18/22). The absolute frequencies of Y involvement with In(1)sc⁸ (7/105067) and In(1)sc^8L, EN^R,(2/38588), however, are comparable. The heterochromatic constitution of the recombinants examined is consistent with the hypothesis that an observed excess of recombinants recoverred from In(1)sc^8L, EN^R as compared with In(1)sc⁸ is accounted for by Y independent recombinants and is the consequence of exchange between the second heterochromatin arm of In(1)EN^R and the distal heterochromatin of In(1)sc^8L. A maximum of six different regions of exchange between these two regions may be inferred from the constitution of the recombinants. This inference is considered to support the hypothesis that pairing and exchange between heterochromatic regions are not strictly homologous.With 6 Figures in the TextOperated by Union Carbide Nuclear Company for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.Part of the material was presented to the Graduate School of the California Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy supported by an Atomic Energy Commission predoctoral fellowship. Further experimentation has been pursued under a National Research Council postdoctoral fellowship at the University and under a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Missouri. Experimentation was completed at Oak Ridge.     

FISH分析栽培高粱×拟高粱、甜高粱×拟高粱的染色体行为

采用荧光原位杂交技术对45S rDNA在栽培高粱×拟高粱、甜高粱×拟高粱F1的有丝分裂和减数分裂染色体进行定位研究。在有丝分裂中期染色体上2个杂种分别检测到2个杂交信号, 在减数分裂粗线期、终变期、中期Ⅰ染色体上45S rDNA位于一个二价体上, 说明这两个杂种携带45S rDNA的染色体为同源染色体。根据45S rDNA位点随细胞减数分裂过程的位置变化, 表明这两个杂种染色体配对行为正常, 平均构型为2n=2x=20(10Ⅱ), 证明45S rDNA可作为染色体的一个识别指标间接地观察细胞减数分裂过程染色体的变化行为。     

Pleiotropic effects associated with the deletion of heterochromatin surrounding rDNA on the X chromosome of Drosophila

In Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome heterochromatin (Xh) constitutes the proximal 40% of the X chromosome DNA and contains a number of genetic elements with homologous sites on the Y chromosome, one of which is well defined, namely, the bobbed locus, the repetitive structural locus for the 18S and 28S rRNAs. This report presents the localisation of specific repeated DNA sequences within Xh and the employment of this sequence map in constructing new chromosomes to analyse the nature of the heterochromatin surrounding the rDNA region. Repeated sequences were located relative to inversion breakpoints which differentiate Xh cytogenetically. When the rDNA region was manipulated to be in a position in the chromosome so that it was without the Xh which normally surrounds it, the following obser-vations were made, (i) The rDNA region of Xh is intrinsically hetero-chromatic, remaining genetically active and yet possessing major heterochromatic properties even in the absence of the flanking heterochromatin regions, (ii) The size of the deletion removing the portion of Xh normally located distal to the rDNA region affected the dominance relationship between the X and Y nucleolar organizers (activity/endoreduplication assayed in male salivary glands). The X rDNA without any flanking heterochromatin was dominant over Y rDNA while the presence of some Xh allowed both the X and Y rDNA to be utilized, (iii) Enhancement of the position effect variegation on the white locus was demonstrated to occur as a result of the Xh deletions generated. EMS mutagenesis studies argue that the regions of Xh flanking the rDNA region contain no vital loci despite the fact that they strongly effect gene expression in some genotypes. This is consistent with early studies using X-ray mutagenesis (Lindsley et al., 1960). The pleiotropic effects of deleting specific regions of Xh is discussed in relation to the possible influence of heterochromatin on the organisation of the functional interphase nucleus.     

Interlinear Differences in the Morphology of the Pericentric Region of Salivary Gland Polytene X Chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster

Morphology of the Drosophila melanogasterpolytene X chromosome section 20 in normal flies, in strains carrying inversions that break pericentric heterochromatin at different points, and at the background of the Su(UR)ESmutation has been examined. In all of the strains carrying the Su(UR)ESmutation section 20 displayed a distinct banding pattern till to the section 20F, while in the wild-type strains this region was represented by -heterochromatin. The strains carrying different inversions substantially differed in the number and morphology of bands forming section 20. In the Su(UR)ESmutants the most proximal X chromosome euchromatic gene,su(f), is mapped to the boundary between sections 20E and F, while rDNA forming the middle part of the X chromosome mitotic heterochromatin is located in the proximal part of section 20. All large bands observed in section 20 of the w; Su(UR)ESstrain were also present inIn(1)sc ⁴; Su(UR)ES, which breaks heterochromatin in the distal part. Hence, the bands of polytene chromosome section 20 are virtually devoid of mitotic heterochromatin.     

Meiotic pairing and disjunction of mini-X chromosomes in drosophila is mediated by 240-bp rDNA repeats and the homolog conjunction proteins SNM and MNM

In most eukaryotes, segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis is dependent on crossovers that occur while the homologs are intimately paired during early prophase. Crossovers generate homolog connectors known as chiasmata that are stabilized by cohesion between sister-chromatid arms. In Drosophila males, homologs pair and segregate without recombining or forming chiasmata. Stable pairing of homologs is dependent on two proteins, SNM and MNM, that associate with chromosomes throughout meiosis I until their removal at anaphase I. SNM and MNM localize to the rDNA region of the X-Y pair, which contains 240-bp repeats that have previously been shown to function as cis-acting chromosome pairing/segregation sites. Here we show that heterochromatic mini-X chromosomes lacking native rDNA but carrying transgenic 240-bp repeat arrays segregate preferentially from full-length sex chromosomes and from each other. Mini-X pairs do not form autonomous bivalents but do associate at high frequency with the X-Y bivalent to form trivalents and quadrivalents. Both disjunction of mini-X pairs and multivalent formation are dependent on the presence of SNM and MNM. These results imply that 240-bp repeats function to mediate association of sex chromosomes with SNM and MNM.     

Genetic analysis of the mechanism of the Salmonella phase variation site specific recombination system

Summary Phase variation, the alternation of expression of flagellar antigens H1 and H2, in Salmonella typhimurium is mediated by site specific inversion of a 995 bp DNA segment of the chromosome. Hin, a protein encoded within the 995 bp segment, is thought to catalyze the recombination reaction between 14 bp inverted repeats flanking the 995 bp segment. By comparison of the relative rates of inversion of two different plasmids containing the H2 inversion segment flanked by different sequences, we conclude that the sequences adjacent to the inversion segment affect the rate of inversion. Homologous pairing of the repeats is important in H2 inversion since the orientation of the repeats on the host molecule(s) determines the result of the recombination reaction. The presence of the hin gene mediates the fusion of two plasmids when each contains one of the 14 bp repeat sequences. When the 14 bp sequences are direct repeats on a single molecule the sequence between them is deleted. These results support the hypothesis that the H2 inversion system functions by homologous, conservative, site specific recombination which is similar to the systems found associated with TnA transposons and temperate bacteriophage.