Periodic segmental anomalies induced by heat shock in the chick embryo are associated with the cell cycle

This study provides evidence that cells destined to segment together into somites have a degree of cell division synchrony. We have measured the duration of the cell division cycle in somite and segmental plate cells of the chick embryo as 9.5 h using [3H]thymidine pulse- and-chase. Treatment of embryos with any of a variety of inhibitors known to affect the cell division cycle causes discrete periodic segmental anomalies: these anomalies appear about 6-7 somites after treatment and, in some cases, a second anomaly is observed 6 to 7 somites after the first. Since somites take 1.5 h to form, the 6- to 7- somite interval corresponds to about 9-10 h, which is the duration of the cell cycle as determined in these experiments. The anomalies are similar to those seen after heat shock of 2-day chick embryos. Heat shock and some of the other treatments induce the expression of heat-shock proteins (hsp); however, since neither the expression nor the distribution of these proteins relate to the presence or distribution of anomalies seen, we conclude that hsps are not responsible for the pattern of segmental anomalies observed. The production of periodic segmental anomalies appears to be linked to the cell cycle. A simple model is proposed, in which we suggest that the cell division cycle is involved directly in gating cells that will segment together.     

Can tissue surface tension drive somite formation?

The prevailing model of somitogenesis supposes that the presomitic mesoderm is segmented into somites by a clock and wavefront mechanism. During segmentation, mesenchymal cells undergo compaction, followed by a detachment of the presumptive somite from the rest of the presomitic mesoderm and the subsequent morphological changes leading to rounded somites. We investigate the possibility that minimization of tissue surface tension drives the somite sculpting processes. Given the time in which somite formation occurs and the high bulk viscosities of tissues, we find that only small changes in shape and form of tissue typically occur through cell movement driven by tissue surface tension. This is particularly true for somitogenesis in the zebrafish. Hence it is unlikely that such processes are the sole and major driving force behind somite formation. We propose a simple chemotactic mechanism that together with heightened adhesion can account for the morphological changes in the time allotted for somite formation.     

A clock and trail model for somite formation, specialization and polarization

We present some theoretical considerations about the initial process of pre-patterning during embryonic segmentation, with particular reference to somite formation. We first suggest that the pre-pattern is a stable spatial sinusoidal (or, at least, periodic) wave. The periodic wave originates from an oscillator ("clock") in the proliferative region that gives rise to the cells. At the moment the cells leave the proliferative or "progress" zone, or somewhat later, a permanent record is made of the current state of the oscillation, which cells then keep during their pre-somitic phase, before explicit somite and somite boundary formation. Thus, a trail is left behind the progress zone in the form of a spatial sine wave. Second, we also observe that the factors involved in the progress-zone clock and its wave-like trail may form multimers, which will oscillate with higher space-time frequency and thus shorter wavelengths than the monomers. Whether or not our first suggestion is correct, this phenomenon may account for multiple wavelengths in somitogenesis, and may thus encompass somite formation, but also somite polarization (half-wavelength) into anterior and posterior halves, as well as the puzzling observation that expression of her1 in zebrafish is in primordia of alternating somites, i.e. it exhibits a 2-somite wavelength.     

Sequential activation of three myogenic regulatory genes during somite morphogenesis in quail embryos.

We report the cloning of two new quail myogenic cDNAs, quail myogenic factor 2 (qmf2) and qmf3, which encode helix-loop-helix proteins homologous to mammalian myogenic factors myogenin and myf-5. In situ hybridization has been used to investigate the developmental expression of qmf2 and qmf3, as well as qmf1, the quail homologue to mammalian MyoD1, during the formation of the brachial somites. These studies show that qmf1 and qmf3 are activated sequentially in medially localized somite cells, immediately following somite formation but prior to myotome formation. qmf1, qmf2, and qmf3 are expressed in the myotome of compartmentalized somites. These findings suggest that determination of the myogenic cell lineage in quail somites is a progressive process controlled by influences of the neural tube on the expression of the qmf regulatory genes in newly forming somites.     

Cell cycle progression is required for zebrafish somite morphogenesis but not segmentation clock function

Cell division, differentiation and morphogenesis are coordinated during embryonic development, and frequently are in disarray in pathologies such as cancer. Here, we present a zebrafish mutant that ceases mitosis at the beginning of gastrulation, but that undergoes axis elongation and develops blood, muscle and a beating heart. We identify the mutation as being in early mitotic inhibitor 1 (emi1), a negative regulator of the Anaphase Promoting Complex, and use the mutant to examine the role of the cell cycle in somitogenesis. The mutant phenotype indicates that axis elongation during the segmentation period is driven substantially by cell migration. We find that the segmentation clock, which regulates somitogenesis, functions normally in the absence of cell cycle progression, and observe that mitosis is a modest source of noise for the clock. Somite morphogenesis involves the epithelialization of the somite border cells around a core of mesenchyme. As in wild-type embryos, somite boundary cells are polarized along a Fibronectin matrix in emi1(-/-). The mutants also display evidence of segment polarity. However, in the absence of a normal cell cycle, somites appear to hyper-epithelialize, as the internal mesenchymal cells exit the core of the somite after initial boundary formation. Thus, cell cycle progression is not required during the segmentation period for segmentation clock function but is necessary for the normal segmental arrangement of epithelial borders and internal mesenchymal cells.     

Wnt 6 regulates the epithelialisation process of the segmental plate mesoderm leading to somite formation

In higher vertebrates, the paraxial mesoderm undergoes a mesenchymal to epithelial transformation to form segmentally organised structures called somites. Experiments have shown that signals originating from the ectoderm overlying the somites or from midline structures are required for the formation of the somites, but their identity has yet to be determined. Wnt6 is a good candidate as a somite epithelialisation factor from the ectoderm since it is expressed in this tissue. In this study, we show that injection of Wnt6-producing cells beneath the ectoderm at the level of the segmental plate or lateral to the segmental plate leads to the formation of numerous small epithelial somites. Ectopic expression of Wnt6 leads to sustained expression of markers associated with the epithelial somites and reduced or delayed expression of markers associated with mesenchymally organised somitic tissue. More importantly, we show that Wnt6-producing cells are able to rescue somite formation after ectoderm ablation. Furthermore, injection of Wnt6-producing cells following the isolation of the neural tube/notochord from the segmental plate was able to rescue somite formation at both the structural (epithelialisation) and molecular level, as determined by the expression of marker genes like Paraxis or Pax-3. We show that Wnts are indeed responsible for the epithelialisation of somites by applying Wnt antagonists, which result in the segmental plate being unable to form somites. These results show that Wnt6, the only known member of this family to be localised to the chick paraxial ectoderm, is able to regulate the development of epithelial somites and that cellular organisation is pivotal in the execution of the differentiation programmes. We propose a model in which the localisation of Wnt6 and its antagonists regulates the process of epithelialisation in the paraxial mesoderm.     

Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation

The metameric organization of the vertebrate trunk is a characteristic feature of all members of this phylum. The origin of this metamerism can be traced to the division of paraxial mesoderm into individual units, termed somites, during embryonic development. Despite the identification of somites as the first overt sign of segmentation in vertebrates well over 100 years ago, the mechanism(s) underlying somite formation remain poorly understood. Recently, however, several genes have been identified which play prominent roles in orchestrating segmentation, including the novel secreted factor lunatic fringe. To gain further insight into the mechanism by which lunatic fringe controls somite development, we have conducted a thorough analysis of lunatic fringe expression in the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm of chick embryos. Here we report that lunatic fringe is expressed predominantly in somite -II, where somite I corresponds to the most recently formed somite and somite -I corresponds to the group of cells which will form the next somite. In addition, we show that lunatic fringe is expressed in a highly dynamic manner in the chick segmental plate prior to somite formation and that lunatic fringe expression cycles autonomously with a periodicity of somite formation. Moreover, the murine ortholog of lunatic fringe undergoes a similar cycling expression pattern in the presomitic mesoderm of somite stage mouse embryos. The demonstration of a dynamic periodic expression pattern suggests that lunatic fringe may function to integrate notch signaling to a cellular oscillator controlling somite segmentation.     

Regulation of somitogenesis by Ena/VASP proteins and FAK during Xenopus development

The metameric organization of the vertebrate body plan is established during somitogenesis as somite pairs sequentially form along the anteroposterior axis. Coordinated regulation of cell shape, motility and adhesion are crucial for directing the morphological segmentation of somites. We show that members of the Ena/VASP family of actin regulatory proteins are required for somitogenesis in Xenopus. Xenopus Ena (Xena) localizes to the cell periphery in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM), and is enriched at intersomitic junctions and at myotendinous junctions in somites and the myotome, where it co-localizes with beta1-integrin, vinculin and FAK. Inhibition of Ena/VASP function with dominant-negative mutants results in abnormal somite formation that correlates with later defects in intermyotomal junctions. Neutralization of Ena/VASP activity disrupts cell rearrangements during somite rotation and leads to defects in the fibronectin (FN) matrix surrounding somites. Furthermore, inhibition of Ena/VASP function impairs FN matrix assembly, spreading of somitic cells on FN and autophosphorylation of FAK, suggesting a role for Ena/VASP proteins in the modulation of integrin-mediated processes. We also show that inhibition of FAK results in defects in somite formation, blocks FN matrix deposition and alters Xena localization. Together, these results provide evidence that Ena/VASP proteins and FAK are required for somite formation in Xenopus and support the idea that Ena/VASP and FAK function in a common pathway to regulate integrin-dependent migration and adhesion during somitogenesis.     

Developmental Fate of Artificially Disordered Somite Cells after Heteroplastic Transplantation

A disordered somite pattern could be produced artificially when the segmental lateral plate of chickembryo was replaced by dissociated cells of quail segmental pate.The artificially disordered somitepattern formed at either place was used in our work as a model to analyze the mechanism of thedevelopment and differentiation of somite on chick embryo.Our conclusions include the following:1.Although the formation of somites from the dissociated segmental plate cells does not requirespecial environment,the development and differentiation of the somltes require a special environmentwhich is related to the neural tube and notochord.The effect of this special environmental factor maydecrease gradually with the increase of the distance from neural tube to lateral plate.2.The somites located on paraxial area at different distances to the axis have different fates indevelopment.3.The formation of epithelial vesicles is the property of somite cells and the epithelial vesicle is thestructural basis of somite differentiation.If and factor interferes with the differentiation of thesomite,the epithelial vesicle of the somite will be degenerated within certain period of time.4.During resegmentation of the somite,the number,size and arrangement of sclerotome in situ donot depend on the somite from which they are derived.5.Somite cells do not transdifferentiate into kidney tubule directly from their original epithelialvesicles,but are reorganized from the free cells dispersed from the disrupted somites.6.The establishment of cell commitment may involve several steps.Before commitment isestablished the of cell commitment is labile.7.The differentiation of sclerotome starts with the rupture of epithelial wall of somites and thedirection of its movement depends not only on the notochord but also on their position with respectto the neural tube and notochord.8.The disordered somite pattern doesn't influence the segmentation of dorsal root ganglia in situ,but causes the formation of the ectopic dorsal root ganglia.Key Words:Somite differentiation;Artificial disordered somite pattern;Chimeral somite;Resegmentation of sclerotome;Distribution of dorsal root ganglia     

Segmentation in vertebrates: a molecular clock linked to periodic somite formation]

In the vertebrate embryo, somites constitute the basis of the segmental body pattern. They give rise to the axial skeleton, the dermis of the back and all striated muscles of the body. In the chick embryo, a pair of somites buds off, in a highly coordinated fashion, every 90 minutes, from the cranial end of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) while new mesenchymal cells enter the paraxial mesoderm as a consequence of gastrulation. The processes leading to the segmentation of the somite are not yet understood. We have identified and characterised c-hairy1, an avian homologue of the Drosophila segmentation gene, hairy. c-hairy1 is strongly expressed in the presomitic mesoderm where its mRNA exhibits a cyclic posterior-to-anterior wave of expression whose periodicity corresponds to the formation time of one somite (90 min). Fate mapping of the rostral half of the PSM using the quail-chick chimera technique supports a model of cryptic segmentation within the presomitic mesoderm, and indicates that c-hairy1 expression dynamics are not due to massive cell displacement. Analysis of in vitro cultures of isolated presomitic mesoderm demonstrates that rhythmic c-hairy1 mRNA production and degradation is an autonomous property of the paraxial mesoderm. Rather than resulting from the caudal-to-rostral propagation of an activating signal, it arises from pulses of c-hairy1 expression that are coordinated in time and space. Blocking protein synthesis does not alter the propagation of c-hairy1 expression, indicating that negative autoregulation of c-hairy1 expression is unlikely to control its periodic expression. Most of the segmentation models proposed for somite formation rely on the existence of an internal clock coordinating the cells to segment together to form a somite. These results provide the first molecular evidence of a developmental clock linked to segmentation and somitogenesis of the paraxial mesoderm, and support the possibility that segmentation mechanisms used by invertebrates and vertebrates have been conserved.     

Off limits--integrins holding boundaries in somitogenesis

Borders are essential for demarcating repeated structures such as somites during vertebrate development. Two recent articles describe roles for Integrinalpha5 and its ligand Fibronectin1 in zebrafish anterior intersomitic boundary formation and link them to Notch and Eph-Ephrin pathways in epithelialization of somite boundary cells. Together with these pathways, Integrinalpha5 and Fibronectin1 orchestrate the orderly formation of somite and later myotome borders. These studies shed light on components downstream of the periodic segmentation mechanism - the 'segmentation clock' - in somitogenesis.     

Notch Is a Critical Component of the Mouse Somitogenesis Oscillator and Is Essential for the Formation of the Somites

Segmentation of the vertebrate body axis is initiated through somitogenesis, whereby epithelial somites bud off in pairs periodically from the rostral end of the unsegmented presomitic mesoderm (PSM). The periodicity of somitogenesis is governed by a molecular oscillator that drives periodic waves of clock gene expression caudo-rostrally through the PSM with a periodicity that matches somite formation. To date the clock genes comprise components of the Notch, Wnt, and FGF pathways. The literature contains controversial reports as to the absolute role(s) of Notch signalling during the process of somite formation. Recent data in the zebrafish have suggested that the only role of Notch signalling is to synchronise clock gene oscillations across the PSM and that somite formation can continue in the absence of Notch activity. However, it is not clear in the mouse if an FGF/Wnt-based oscillator is sufficient to generate segmented structures, such as the somites, in the absence of all Notch activity. We have investigated the requirement for Notch signalling in the mouse somitogenesis clock by analysing embryos carrying a mutation in different components of the Notch pathway, such as Lunatic fringe (Lfng), Hes7, Rbpj, and presenilin1/presenilin2 (Psen1/Psen2), and by pharmacological blocking of the Notch pathway. In contrast to the fish studies, we show that mouse embryos lacking all Notch activity do not show oscillatory activity, as evidenced by the absence of waves of clock gene expression across the PSM, and they do not develop somites. We propose that, at least in the mouse embryo, Notch activity is absolutely essential for the formation of a segmented body axis.     

Two linked hairy/Enhancer of split-related zebrafish genes,her1 and her7, function together to refine alternating somite boundaries

The formation of somites, reiterated structures that will give rise to vertebrae and muscles, is thought to be dependent upon a molecular oscillator that may involve the Notch pathway. hairy/Enhancer of split related [E(spl)]-related (her or hes) genes, potential targets of Notch signaling, have been implicated as an output of the molecular oscillator. We have isolated a zebrafish deficiency, b567, that deletes two linked her genes, her1 and her7. Homozygous b567 mutants have defective somites along the entire embryonic axis. Injection of a combination of her1 and her7 (her1+7) morpholino modified antisense oligonucleotides (MOs) phenocopies the b567 mutant somitic phenotype, indicating that her1 and her7 are necessary for normal somite formation and that defective somitogenesis in b567 mutant embryos is due to deletion of her1 and her7. Analysis at the cellular level indicates that somites in her1+7-deficient embryos are enlarged in the anterior-posterior dimension. Weak somite boundaries are often found within these enlarged somites which are delineated by stronger, but imperfect, boundaries. In addition, the anterior-posterior polarity of these enlarged somites is disorganized. Analysis of her1 MO-injected embryos and her7 MO-injected embryos indicates that although these genes have partially redundant functions in most of the trunk region, her1 is necessary for proper formation of the anteriormost somites and her7 is necessary for proper formation of somites posterior to somite 11. By following somite development over time, we demonstrate that her genes are necessary for the formation of alternating strong somite boundaries. Thus, even though two potential downstream components of Notch signaling are lacking in her1+7-deficient embryos, somite boundaries form, but do so with a one and a half to two segment periodicity.     

A mathematical investigation of a Clock and Wavefront model for somitogenesis

Somites are transient blocks of cells that form sequentially along the antero-posterior axis of vertebrate embryos. They give rise to the vertebrae, ribs and other associated features of the trunk. In this work we develop and analyse a mathematical formulation of a version of the Clock and Wavefront model for somite formation, where the clock controls when the boundaries of the somites form and the wavefront determines where they form. Our analysis indicates that this interaction between a segmentation clock and a wavefront can explain the periodic pattern of somites observed in normal embryos. We can also show that a simplification of the model provides a mechanism for predicting the anomalies resulting from perturbation of the wavefront.     

Vertebrate segmentation: is cycling the rule?

Vertebrate segmentation initiates with the subdivision of the paraxial mesoderm into a regular array of somites. Recent evidence suggests that the segmentation clock - a biochemical oscillator acting in the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm cells in most vertebrates - controls cyclic Notch signalling, resulting in periodic formation of somite boundaries.     

Critical numbers of neural crest cells are required in the pathways from the neural tube to the foregut to ensure complete enteric nervous system formation

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is mainly derived from vagal neural crest cells (NCC) that arise at the level of somites 1-7. To understand how the size and composition of the NCC progenitor pool affects ENS development, we reduced the number of NCC by ablating the neural tube adjacent to somites 3-6 to produce aganglionic gut. We then back-transplanted various somite lengths of quail neural tube into the ablated region to determine the 'tipping point', whereby sufficient progenitors were available for complete ENS formation. The addition of one somite length of either vagal, sacral or trunk neural tube into embryos that had the neural tube ablated adjacent to somites 3-6, resulted in ENS formation along the entire gut. Although these additional cells contributed to the progenitor pool, the quail NCC from different axial levels retained their intrinsic identities with respect to their ability to form the ENS; vagal NCC formed most of the ENS, sacral NCC contributed a limited number of ENS cells, and trunk NCC did not contribute to the ENS. As one somite length of vagal NCC was found to comprise almost the entire ENS, we ablated all of the vagal neural crest and back-transplanted one somite length of vagal neural tube from the level of somite 1 or somite 3 into the vagal region at the position of somite 3. NCC from somite 3 formed the ENS along the entire gut, whereas NCC from somite 1 did not. Intrinsic differences, such as an increased capacity for proliferation, as demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, appear to underlie the ability of somite 3 NCC to form the entire ENS.     

Eph/Ephrin signaling regulates the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of the paraxial mesoderm during somite morphogenesis

BACKGROUND: During somitogenesis, segmental patterns of gene activity provide the instructions by which mesenchymal cells epithelialize and form somites. Various members of the Eph family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases and their Ephrin ligands are expressed in a segmental pattern in the rostral presomitic mesoderm. This pattern establishes a receptor/ligand interface at each site of somite furrow formation. In the fused somites (fss/tbx24) mutant, lack of intersomitic boundaries and epithelial somites is accompanied by a lack of Eph receptor/Ephrin signaling interfaces. These observations suggest a role for Eph/Ephrin signaling in the regulation of somite epithelialization. RESULTS: We show that restoration of Eph/Ephrin signaling in the paraxial mesoderm of fss mutants rescues most aspects of somite morphogenesis. First, restoration of bidirectional or unidirectional EphA4/Ephrin signaling results in the formation and maintenance of morphologically distinct boundaries. Second, activation of EphA4 leads to the cell-autonomous acquisition of a columnar morphology and apical redistribution of beta-catenin, aspects of epithelialization characteristic of cells at somite boundaries. Third, activation of EphA4 leads to nonautonomous acquisition of columnar morphology and polarized relocalization of the centrosome and nucleus in cells on the opposite side of the forming boundary. These nonautonomous aspects of epithelialization may involve interplay of EphA4 with other intercellular signaling molecules. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that Eph/Ephrin signaling is an important component of the molecular mechanisms driving somite morphogenesis. We propose a new role for Eph receptors and Ephrins as intercellular signaling molecules that establish cell polarity during mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of the paraxial mesoderm.     

Hedgehog regulation of superficial slow muscle fibres in Xenopus and the evolution of tetrapod trunk myogenesis

In tetrapod phylogeny, the dramatic modifications of the trunk have received less attention than the more obvious evolution of limbs. In somites, several waves of muscle precursors are induced by signals from nearby tissues. In both amniotes and fish, the earliest myogenesis requires secreted signals from the ventral midline carried by Hedgehog (Hh) proteins. To determine if this similarity represents evolutionary homology, we have examined myogenesis in Xenopus laevis, the major species from which insight into vertebrate mesoderm patterning has been derived. Xenopus embryos form two distinct kinds of muscle cells analogous to the superficial slow and medial fast muscle fibres of zebrafish. As in zebrafish, Hh signalling is required for XMyf5 expression and generation of a first wave of early superficial slow muscle fibres in tail somites. Thus, Hh-dependent adaxial myogenesis is the likely ancestral condition of teleosts, amphibia and amniotes. Our evidence suggests that midline-derived cells migrate to the lateral somite surface and generate superficial slow muscle. This cell re-orientation contributes to the apparent rotation of Xenopus somites. Xenopus myogenesis in the trunk differs from that in the tail. In the trunk, the first wave of superficial slow fibres is missing, suggesting that significant adaptation of the ancestral myogenic programme occurred during tetrapod trunk evolution. Although notochord is required for early medial XMyf5 expression, Hh signalling fails to drive these cells to slow myogenesis. Later, both trunk and tail somites develop a second wave of Hh-independent slow fibres. These fibres probably derive from an outer cell layer expressing the myogenic determination genes XMyf5, XMyoD and Pax3 in a pattern reminiscent of amniote dermomyotome. Thus, Xenopus somites have characteristics in common with both fish and amniotes that shed light on the evolution of somite differentiation. We propose a model for the evolutionary adaptation of myogenesis in the transition from fish to tetrapod trunk.     

Redefining the head-trunk interface for the neural crest

The head-trunk interface lies at the occipito-cervical boundary, which corresponds to the somite 5/6 level. Previous studies have demonstrated that neural crest cells also behave differently either side of this boundary and that this may be due to intrinsic differences between cranial and trunk crest. However, it is also possible that some of the observed differences between cranial and trunk crest are assigned by environmental cues. We have therefore scrutinised the behaviour of the neural crest cells generated either side of the occipito-cervical boundary in chick and, interestingly, find that both behave in a truncal fashion by traversing the anterior half of their adjacent somites. Furthermore, although not previously described, we find that transient DRGs form opposite somites 4 and 5. Crest cells produced anterior of the somite 3/4 boundary avoid the somites and behave in a non-truncal fashion; these cells populate the pharyngeal arches, and thus contribute to the developing head. We have further shown, via somite transplantations, that differential behaviour of the posterior versus anterior occipital crest is assigned by the somites. If somites 1 to 3 are replaced by trunk somites, then the anterior occipital crest will behave in a truncal fashion by invading the somites. Correspondingly, if these anterior occipital somites are transplanted in place of trunk somites, they perturb the migration of trunk crest. Thus, for the neural crest, the head-trunk interface does not lie at the occipito-cervical boundary, but rather lies at the somite 3/4 level and is defined by the somites. The fact that this boundary lies at the somite 3/4 level in chick is significant as it reflects the more ancient posterior occipital boundary; in fish, only the first three somites contribute to the occipital bone.