Epstein-Barr Virus Uses Different Complexes of Glycoproteins gH and gL To Infect B Lymphocytes and Epithelial Cells

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gH-gL complex includes a third glycoprotein, gp42. gp42 binds to HLA class II on the surfaces of B lymphocytes, and this interaction is essential for infection of the B cell. We report here that, in contrast, gp42 is dispensable for infection of epithelial cell line SVKCR2. A soluble form of gp42, gp42.Fc, can, however, inhibit infection of both cell types. Soluble gp42 can interact with EBV gH and gL and can rescue the ability of virus lacking gp42 to transform B cells, suggesting that a gH-gL-gp42.Fc complex can be formed by extrinsic addition of the soluble protein. Truncated forms of gp42.Fc that retain the ability to bind HLA class II but that cannot interact with gH and gL still inhibit B-cell infection by wild-type virus but cannot inhibit infection of SVKCR2 cells or rescue the ability of recombinant gp42-negative virus to transform B cells. An analysis of wild-type virions indicates the presence of more gH and gL than gp42. To explain these results, we describe a model in which wild-type EBV virions are proposed to contain two types of gH-gL complexes, one that includes gp42 and one that does not. We further propose that these two forms of the complex have mutually exclusive abilities to mediate the infection of B cells and epithelial cells. Conversion of one to the other concurrently alters the ability of virus to infect each cell type. The model also suggests that epithelial cells may express a molecule that serves the same cofactor function for this cell type as HLA class II does for B cells and that the gH-gL complex interacts directly with this putative epithelial cofactor.All herpesviruses examined to date encode a complex of two glycoproteins, gH and gL, that appear to be necessary, if not sufficient, for virus penetration. Glycoprotein gH is generally thought to be the major player in virus cell fusion (5, 6, 8, 14, 20, 25, 26), while the role of gL is to serve as a chaperone, essential for folding and transport of functional gH (3, 11, 13, 20, 21, 28, 29). The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gH-gL complex follows this pattern. Glycoprotein gp85, the gH homolog, is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum in the absence of gp25, the EBV gL (38), and virosomes made from EBV proteins depleted of the gH-gL complex bind to cells but fail to fuse (9). The EBV gH-gL complex, however, includes a third glycoprotein, gp42, which is the product of the BZLF2 open reading frame (ORF) (18). This third component has also proven to be essential for penetration of the major target cell of EBV, the B lymphocyte. Several lines of evidence indicate that gp42 is a ligand for HLA class II and, further, that HLA class II functions as a cell surface cofactor for EBV entry into this cell type. Glycoprotein gp42 interacts with the β₁ domain of HLA class II protein HLA-DR (30), and a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to gp42 called F-2-1 interferes with this interaction (17). MAb F-2-1 has no effect on EBV attachment via glycoprotein gp350/220 to its primary receptor, complement receptor type 2 (CR2; CD21) but inhibits the fusion of the virus with the B-cell membrane (22). Similarly, a MAb to HLA-DR or a soluble form of gp42 blocks B-cell transformation. Finally, B-cell lines which lack expression of HLA class II are not susceptible to superinfection with EBV unless expression of class II is restored (17). Most recently, we derived a recombinant virus with gp42 expression deleted and confirmed that loss of the glycoprotein resulted in a virus that attached to the B-cell surface but that failed to penetrate unless it was treated with the fusogenic agent polyethylene glycol (36).Although most is known about the early interactions of EBV with B lymphocytes in vitro since these cells are readily available and easy to culture, infection is not restricted to this cell type in vivo. During our initial analysis of the biology of gp42 we had therefore examined its potential role in infection of a then newly derived model epithelial cell line, SVKCR2. SVKCR2 cells are transformed with simian virus 40 and stably transfected with B-cell receptor CR2 (19). They are poorly infectable with many strains of EBV, but in excess of 30% of the cells can be infected with the Akata strain of virus as judged by the expression of EBV latent protein EBNA 1 (18, 19). We found that MAb F-2-1 had no effect on the infection of SVKCR2 cells. At the same time, a second MAb, E1D1, which reacts with an epitope that can be formed by the coexpression of gH and gL in the absence of gp42, neutralized infection of SVKCR2 cells, but had no effect on the infection of lymphocytes. These data strongly suggested that the involvement of the gH-gL complex in the internalization of virus into the two cell types was different. We hypothesized that just as EBV has evolved a glycoprotein, gp350/220, which is uniquely adapted for attachment to B lymphocytes, so it has evolved a second glycoprotein, gp42, uniquely adapted for penetration into the same cell type (18). The implication was that gp42 might be dispensable for infection of epithelial cells.Since we made our initial observations with SVKCR2 cells, several novel reagents, including the Akata strain virus with the expression of gp42 deleted, have become available. The recent insights into the role of HLA class II in B-cell infection also provided new impetus to reexamine the involvement of the gH-gL complex in epithelial cell infection. We report here that gp42 is not required for infection of SVKCR2 cells despite the fact that the soluble form of the protein that inhibits B-cell infection can also neutralize infection of SVKCR2 cells. To explain these apparently anomalous results, we describe a model which proposes that wild-type EBV virions contain two types of gH-gL complexes, one that includes gp42 and one that does not. We further propose that the tripartite “B-cell complexes” are not functional for infection of epithelial cells, just as the bipartite “epithelial cell complexes” are unable to mediate infection of the B lymphocyte.     

Epstein-Barr Virus Lacking Glycoprotein gp42 Can Bind to B Cells but Is Not Able To Infect

The Epstein-Barr virus gH-gL complex includes a third glycoprotein, gp42, which is the product of the BZLF2 open reading frame (ORF). gp42 has been implicated as critical to infection of the B lymphocyte by virtue of its interaction with HLA class II on the B-cell surface. A neutralizing antibody that reacts with gp42 inhibits virus-cell fusion and blocks binding of gp42 to HLA class II; antibody to HLA class II can inhibit infection, and B cells that lack HLA class II can only be infected if HLA class II expression is restored. To confirm whether gp42 is an essential component of the virion, we derived a recombinant virus with a selectable marker inserted into the BZLF2 ORF to interrupt expression of the protein. A complex of gH and gL was expressed by the recombinant virus in the absence of gp42. Recombinant virus egressed from the cell normally and could bind to receptor-positive cells. It had, however, lost the ability to infect or transform B lymphocytes. Treatment with polyethylene glycol restored the infectivity of recombinant virus, confirming that gp42 is essential for penetration of the B-cell membrane.Entry of enveloped viruses into mammalian cells requires that the virion envelope fuse with the cell membrane after attachment to the cell surface. Herpesviruses require the functions of multiple protein species to mediate this event, and in keeping with the common origin and diverse habitats of these viruses, some of the proteins involved in penetration appear to be conserved throughout the family and some appear to be restricted to individual members or more closely related members with similar tropism. The two glycoproteins gH and gL fall into the first category of conserved proteins. Glycoprotein gH has been implicated as a major player in virus-cell fusion in many herpesviruses (8, 10, 11, 22, 28, 32, 34), and gL is an essential partner which is required for folding and transport of gH out of the endoplasmic reticulum (6, 19, 21, 27, 28, 35, 38, 45). The gH and gL homologs of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are gp85, the product of the BXLF2 open reading frame (ORF) (13, 31), and gp25, the product of the BKRF2 ORF (45), and these homologs appear to behave much as their counterparts in other herpesviruses do (45). However, a third glycoprotein, gp42, associates with the EBV gH-gL complex and falls into the second category of proteins, those with a more restricted distribution.Glycoprotein gp42 is the product of the BZLF2 ORF (26), and although there may be a functionally similar protein in cytomegalovirus (18, 24), it is not predicted to have a homolog in other human herpesviruses. It does, however, have a homolog in ORF51 of equine herpes virus 2 (43). Both EBV and equine herpes virus 2 infect B lymphocytes (1), and several lines of evidence suggest that, at least in the case of EBV, gp42 is critical to the infection of this cell type. A monoclonal antibody (MAb) called F-2-1 that reacts with gp42 has no affect on EBV attachment to its receptor, complement receptor type 2 (CR2) (CD21), but inhibits fusion of the virus with the B-cell membrane and neutralizes infection (29). Glycoprotein gp42 interacts with the β₁ domain of the HLA class II protein HLA-DR (39), and MAb F-2-1 interferes with this interaction (25). Like F-2-1, a MAb to HLA-DR or a soluble form of gp42 can block B-cell transformation, and B-cell lines which lack expression of HLA class II are not susceptible to superinfection with EBV unless expression of HLA class II is restored (25). Collectively these observations suggest that gp42, probably by virtue of its interaction with HLA class II, is essential to infection of the B lymphocyte. To answer directly the question of whether gp42 is an indispensable glycoprotein, we derived a virus that could be definitively shown to lack expression of the molecule and examined its ability to infect normal resting B lymphocytes. We report here that virus with expression of gp42 blocked can exit cells normally and can bind to receptor-positive target cells. However, it is unable to penetrate into cells and initiate infection.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Enhanced Virus Clearance by Early Inducible Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Immunoglobulin-Transgenic Mice

Following infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), virus-neutralizing antibodies appear late, after 30 to 60 days. Such neutralizing antibodies play an important role in protection against reinfection. To analyze whether a neutralizing antibody response which developed earlier could contribute to LCMV clearance during the acute phase of infection, we generated transgenic mice expressing LCMV-neutralizing antibodies. Transgenic mice expressing the immunoglobulin μ heavy chain of the LCMV-neutralizing monoclonal antibody KL25 (H25 transgenic mice) mounted LCMV-neutralizing immunoglobulin M (IgM) serum titers within 8 days after infection. This early inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibody response significantly improved the host’s capacity to clear the infection and did not cause an enhancement of disease after intracerebral (i.c.) LCMV infection. In contrast, mice which had been passively administered LCMV-neutralizing antibodies and transgenic mice exhibiting spontaneous LCMV-neutralizing IgM serum titers (HL25 transgenic mice expressing the immunoglobulin μ heavy and the κ light chain) showed an enhancement of disease after i.c. LCMV infection. Thus, early-inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibodies can contribute to viral clearance in the acute phase of the infection and do not cause antibody-dependent enhancement of disease.Against many cytopathic viruses such as poliovirus, influenza virus, rabies virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus, protective virus-neutralizing antibodies are generated early, within 1 week after infection (3, 31, 36, 44, 49). In contrast, several noncytopathic viruses (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis viruses B and C in humans or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [LCMV] in mice) elicit poor and delayed virus-neutralizing antibody responses (1, 7, 20, 24, 27, 35, 45, 48).In the mouse, the natural host of LCMV, the acute LCMV infection is predominantly controlled by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in an obligatory perforin-dependent manner (13, 18, 28, 50). In addition to the CTL response, LCMV-specific antibodies are generated. Early after infection (by day 8), a strong antibody response specific for the internal viral nucleoprotein (NP) is mounted (7, 19, 23, 28). These early LCMV NP-specific antibodies exhibit no virus-neutralizing capacity (7, 10). Results from studies of B-cell-depleted mice and B-cell-deficient mice implied that the early LCMV NP-specific antibodies are not involved in the clearance of LCMV (8, 11, 12, 40). Late after infection (between days 30 and day 60), LCMV-neutralizing antibodies develop (7, 19, 22, 28, 33); these antibodies are directed against the surface glycoprotein (GP) of LCMV (9, 10). LCMV-neutralizing antibodies have an important function in protection against reinfection (4, 6, 38, 41, 47).In some viral infections, subprotective virus-neutralizing antibody titers can enhance disease rather than promote host recovery (i.e., exhibit antibody-dependent enhancement of disease [ADE] [14, 15, 21, 46]). For example, neutralizing antibodies are involved in the resolution of a primary dengue virus infection and in the protection against reinfection. However, if subprotective neutralizing antibody titers are present at the time of reinfection, a severe form of the disease (dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome [15, 21]), which might be caused by Fc receptor-mediated uptake of virus-antibody complexes leading to an enhanced infection of monocytes (15, 16, 25, 39), can develop. Similarly, an enhancement of disease after intracerebral (i.c.) LCMV infection was observed in mice which had been treated with virus-neutralizing antibodies before the virus challenge (6). ADE in LCMV-infected mice was either due to an enhanced infection of monocytes by Fc receptor-mediated uptake of antibody-virus complexes or due to CTL-mediated immunopathology caused by an imbalanced virus spread and CTL response.To analyze whether LCMV-neutralizing antibodies generated early after infection improve the host’s capacity to clear the virus or enhance immunopathological disease, immunoglobulin (Ig)-transgenic mice expressing LCMV-neutralizing IgM antibodies were generated. After LCMV infection of transgenic mice expressing the Ig heavy chain (H25 transgenic mice), LCMV-neutralizing serum antibodies were mounted within 8 days, which significantly improved the host’s capacity to eliminate LCMV. H25 transgenic mice did not show any signs of ADE after i.c. LCMV infection.Transgenic mice expressing the Ig heavy and light chains (HL25 transgenic mice) exhibited spontaneous LCMV-neutralizing serum antibodies and confirmed the protective role of preexisting LCMV-neutralizing antibodies, even though the neutralizing serum antibodies were of the IgM isotype. Similar to mice which had been treated with LCMV-neutralizing antibodies, HL25 transgenic mice developed an enhanced disease after i.c. LCMV infection, which indicated that ADE was due to an imbalance between virus spread and CTL response. Thus, the early-inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibody response significantly enhanced clearance of the acute infection without any risk of causing ADE.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

The Wavelet-Based Cluster Analysis for Temporal Gene Expression Data

A variety of high-throughput methods have made it possible to generate detailed temporal expression data for a single gene or large numbers of genes. Common methods for analysis of these large data sets can be problematic. One challenge is the comparison of temporal expression data obtained from different growth conditions where the patterns of expression may be shifted in time. We propose the use of wavelet analysis to transform the data obtained under different growth conditions to permit comparison of expression patterns from experiments that have time shifts or delays. We demonstrate this approach using detailed temporal data for a single bacterial gene obtained under 72 different growth conditions. This general strategy can be applied in the analysis of data sets of thousands of genes under different conditions.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Multipattern Consensus Regions in Multiple Aligned Protein Sequences and Their Segmentation

Decomposing a biological sequence into its functional regions is an important prerequisite to understand the molecule. Using the multiple alignments of the sequences, we evaluate a segmentation based on the type of statistical variation pattern from each of the aligned sites. To describe such a more general pattern, we introduce multipattern consensus regions as segmented regions based on conserved as well as interdependent patterns. Thus the proposed consensus region considers patterns that are statistically significant and extends a local neighborhood. To show its relevance in protein sequence analysis, a cancer suppressor gene called p53 is examined. The results show significant associations between the detected regions and tendency of mutations, location on the 3D structure, and cancer hereditable factors that can be inferred from human twin studies.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]     

Inflammasome-dependent Caspase-1 Activation in Cervical Epithelial Cells Stimulates Growth of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis

Inflammasomes have been extensively characterized in monocytes and macrophages, but not in epithelial cells, which are the preferred host cells for many pathogens. Here we show that cervical epithelial cells express a functional inflammasome. Infection of the cells by Chlamydia trachomatis leads to activation of caspase-1, through a process requiring the NOD-like receptor family member NLRP3 and the inflammasome adaptor protein ASC. Secretion of newly synthesized virulence proteins from the chlamydial vacuole through a type III secretion apparatus results in efflux of K⁺ through glibenclamide-sensitive K⁺ channels, which in turn stimulates production of reactive oxygen species. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species are responsible for NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation in the infected cells. In monocytes and macrophages, caspase-1 is involved in processing and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β. However, in epithelial cells, which are not known to secrete large quantities of interleukin-1β, caspase-1 has been shown previously to enhance lipid metabolism. Here we show that, in cervical epithelial cells, caspase-1 activation is required for optimal growth of the intracellular chlamydiae.Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of bacterial sexually transmitted disease in the United States, and it is the leading cause of preventable blindness in the world (1–5). Untreated, C. trachomatis infection in women can cause pelvic inflammatory disease, which can lead to infertility and ectopic pregnancy because of scarring of the ovaries and the Fallopian tubes (6). Infection by the lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)² strain of C. trachomatis, which has become more common in North America and Europe (7, 8), is characterized by swelling and inflammation of the lymph nodes in the groin (9).Chlamydiae are intracellular pathogens that preferentially infect epithelial mucosa and have a biphasic infection cycle (10). A metabolically inactive form, the elementary body, infects the epithelial host cells through entry vesicles that avoid fusion with host cell lysosomes and develop into a membrane-bound inclusion (11–13). Despite their intravacuolar localization, chlamydiae are still able to acquire nutrients from the host cell and interact with host-cell signaling pathways (13–23). Within a few hours, the elementary bodies differentiate into larger, metabolically active reticulate bodies, which proliferate but are noninfectious. Depending on the strain of C. trachomatis, the reticulate bodies transform back into elementary bodies after 1–3 days and are released into the extracellular medium to infect other cells (11, 24, 25). Chlamydial species possess a type III secretion (T3S) system that secretes bacterial virulence factors into host cell cytosol and may control interactions between the inclusion and host-cell compartments (26).Long before the adaptive immune response is activated, infected epithelial cells produce proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (27), which recruit neutrophils to the site of infection and activate other immune effector cells. However, in many cases the immune system fails to clear the infection, and the chronic release of cytokines becomes a major contributor to the scarring and damage associated with the infection (28–30).The innate immune response during C. trachomatis infection is initiated by chlamydial pathogen-associated molecular patterns, including lipopolysaccharides, which bind to pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors and cytosolic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), ultimately promoting pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression and secretion of the cytokine proteins (31–37). However, secretion of the key pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is tightly regulated (38). First, pro-IL-1β is produced following activation of pattern recognition receptor, and the precursor is then cleaved into the mature form by the pro-inflammatory cysteine protease, caspase-1 (also known as interleukin-1 converting enzyme or ICE). The mechanism by which caspase-1 is activated in response to infection or tissue damage was found to be modulated by a macromolecular protein complex termed the “inflammasome,” which consists of an NLR family member, an adaptor protein (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation recruitment domain or ASC), and an inactive caspase-1 precursor (pro-caspase-1) (39, 40). Previous studies demonstrated that IL-1β is produced in response to chlamydial infection in dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes (41–44). Moreover, C. trachomatis or Chlamydia caviae infection activates caspase-1 in epithelial cells or monocytes (43, 45, 46). However, whether caspase-1 activation during chlamydial infection requires the formation of an inflammasome remains unclear.Previous studies have shown that different pathogens can cause inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation in macrophages and monocytes (47). However, epithelial cells lining mucosal surfaces are not only the preferred target for chlamydial infection and other intracellular pathogens but also play an important role in early host immune response to infection by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (27). Although epithelial cells are not known to secrete large amounts of IL-1β, inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells is known to contribute to lipid metabolism and membrane regeneration in epithelial cells damaged by the membrane-disrupting toxin, aerolysin (48). As lipids are sorted from the Golgi apparatus to the chlamydial inclusion (13, 15, 49), we therefore investigated whether C. trachomatis induces caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells via the assembly of an inflammasome. We demonstrated that C. trachomatis-induced caspase-1 activation is mediated by an inflammasome containing the NLR member, NLRP3. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of T3S apparatus in inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation by different pathogens in macrophages and monocytes (50–56). Therefore, we further investigated the mechanism by which C. trachomatis triggers the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Our results showed that metabolically active chlamydiae, relying on their T3S apparatus, cause K⁺ efflux, which in turn leads to formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ultimately NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation. Epithelial cells do not typically secrete large amounts of IL-1β; instead, caspase-1 activation in cervical epithelial cells contributes to development of the chlamydial inclusion.     

Infection of Glial Cells by the Human Polyomavirus JC Is Mediated by an N-Linked Glycoprotein Containing Terminal α(2-6)-Linked Sialic Acids

The human JC polyomavirus (JCV) is the etiologic agent of the fatal central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). PML typically occurs in immunosuppressed patients and is the direct result of JCV infection of oligodendrocytes. The initial event in infection of cells by JCV is attachment of the virus to receptors present on the surface of a susceptible cell. Our laboratory has been studying this critical event in the life cycle of JCV, and we have found that JCV binds to a limited number of cell surface receptors on human glial cells that are not shared by the related polyomavirus simian virus 40 (C. K. Liu, A. P. Hope, and W. J. Atwood, J. Neurovirol. 4:49–58, 1998). To further characterize specific JCV receptors on human glial cells, we tested specific neuraminidases, proteases, and phospholipases for the ability to inhibit JCV binding to and infection of glial cells. Several of the enzymes tested were capable of inhibiting virus binding to cells, but only neuraminidase was capable of inhibiting infection. The ability of neuraminidase to inhibit infection correlated with its ability to remove both α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids from glial cells. A recombinant neuraminidase that specifically removes the α(2-3) linkage of sialic acid had no effect on virus binding or infection. A competition assay between virus and sialic acid-specific lectins that recognize either the α(2-3) or the α(2-6) linkage revealed that JCV preferentially interacts with α(2-6)-linked sialic acids on glial cells. Treatment of glial cells with tunicamycin, but not with benzyl N-acetyl-α-d-galactosaminide, inhibited infection by JCV, indicating that the sialylated JCV receptor is an N-linked glycoprotein. As sialic acid containing glycoproteins play a fundamental role in mediating many virus-cell and cell-cell recognition processes, it will be of interest to determine what role these receptors play in the pathogenesis of PML.Approximately 70% of the human population worldwide is seropositive for JC virus (JCV). Like other polyomaviruses, JCV establishes a lifelong latent or persistent infection in its natural host (40, 49, 50, 68, 72). Reactivation of JCV in the setting of an underlying immunosuppressive illness, such as AIDS, is thought to lead to virus dissemination to the central nervous system (CNS) and subsequent infection of oligodendrocytes (37, 40, 66, 68). Reactivation of latent JCV genomes already present in the CNS has also been postulated to contribute to the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) following immunosuppression (19, 48, 55, 70, 75). Approximately 4 to 6% of AIDS patients will develop PML during the course of their illness (10). In the CNS, JCV specifically infects oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. Outside the CNS, JCV genomes have been identified in the urogenital system, in the lymphoid system, and in B lymphocytes (2, 17, 18, 30, 47, 59). In vitro, JCV infects human glial cells and, to a limited extent, human B lymphocytes (3, 4, 39, 41, 42). Recently, JCV infection of tonsillar stromal cells and CD34⁺ B-cell precursors has been described (47). These observations have led to the suggestion that JCV may persist in a lymphoid compartment and that B cells may play a role in trafficking of JCV to the CNS (4, 30, 47).Virus-receptor interactions play a major role in determining virus tropism and tissue-specific pathology associated with virus infection. Viruses that have a very narrow host range and tissue tropism, such as JCV, are often shown to interact with high affinity to a limited number of specific receptors present on susceptible cells (26, 44). In some instances, virus tropism is strictly determined by the presence of specific receptors that mediate binding and entry (7, 16, 27, 35, 46, 53, 56, 67, 73, 74, 76). In other instances, however, successful entry into a cell is necessary but not sufficient for virus growth (5, 8, 45, 57). In these cases, additional permissive factors that interact with viral regulatory elements are required.The receptor binding characteristics of several polyomaviruses have been described. The mouse polyomavirus (PyV) receptor is an N-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-3)-linked sialic acid (12–14, 22, 28). Both the large and small plaque strains of PyV recognize α(2-3)-linked sialic acid. The small-plaque strain also recognizes a branched disialyl structure containing α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. Neither strain recognizes straight-chain α(2-6)-linked sialic acid. The ability of the large- and small-plaque strains of PyV to differentially recognize these sialic acid structures has been precisely mapped to a single amino acid in the major virus capsid protein VP1 (21). The large-plaque strains all contain a glycine at amino acid position 92 in VP1, and the small-plaque strains all contain a negatively charged glutamic acid at this position (21). In addition to forming small or large plaques, these strains also differ in the ability to induce tumors in mice (20). This finding suggests that receptor recognition plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PyV.The cell surface receptor for lymphotropic papovavirus (LPV) is an O-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-6)-linked sialic acid (26, 33, 34). Infection with LPV is restricted to a subset of human B-cell lines, and recognition of specific receptors is a major determinant of the tropism of LPV for these cells (26).Unlike the other members of the polyomavirus family, infection of cells by simian virus 40 (SV40) is independent of cell surface sialic acids. Instead, SV40 infection is mediated by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-encoded class I proteins (5, 11). MHC class I proteins also play a role in mediating the association of SV40 with caveolae, a prerequisite for successful targeting of the SV40 genome to the nucleus of a cell (1, 63). Not surprisingly, SV40 has been shown not to compete with the sialic acid-dependent polyomaviruses for binding to host cells (15, 26, 38, 58).Very little is known about the early steps of JCV binding to and infection of glial cells. Like other members of the polyomavirus family, JCV is known to interact with cell surface sialic acids (51, 52). A role for sialic acids in mediating infection of glial cells has not been described. It is also not known whether the sialic acid is linked to a glycoprotein or a glycolipid. In a previous report, we demonstrated that JCV bound to a limited number of cell surface receptors on SVG cells that were not shared by the related polyomavirus SV40 (38). In this report, we demonstrate that virus binding to and infection of SVG cells is dependent on an N-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. Competitive binding assays with sialic acid-specific lectins suggest that the virus preferentially interacts with α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. We are currently evaluating the role of this receptor in determining the tropism of JCV for glial cells and B cells.