ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Biphasic ethylene production during the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis: A window into defense priming mechanisms?

The hypersensitive response (HR) is a cell death phenomenon associated with localized resistance to pathogens. Biphasic patterns in the generation of H₂O₂, salicylic acid and ethylene have been observed in tobacco during the early stages of the HR. These biphasic models reflect an initial elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns followed by a second phase, induced by pathogen-encoded avirulence gene products. The first phase has been proposed to potentiate the second, to increase the efficacy of plant resistance to disease. This potentiation is comparable to the “priming” of plant defenses which is seen when plants display systemic resistance to disease. The events regulating the generation of the biphasic wave, or priming, remains obscure, however recently we demonstrated a key role for nitric oxide in this process in a HR occurring in tobacco. Here we use laser photoacoustic detection to demonstrate that biphasic ethylene production also occurs during a HR occurring in Arabidopsis. We suggest that ethylene emanation during the HR represents a ready means of visualising biphasic events during the HR and that exploiting the genomic resources offered by this model species will facilitate the development of a mechanistic understanding of potentiating/priming processes.Key words: hypersensitive response, biphasic patterns, potentiation, defense priming, ethylene, ArabidopsisThe Hypersensitive Response (HR) is a cell death process which occurs at the site of attempted pathogen attack and which has been associated with host resistance.¹ Much work on the regulation of the HR has indicated the importance of H₂O₂,² and NO.³ A feature of H₂O₂ generation during the HR is its biphasic pattern (Fig. 1A). The first rise reflects elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)⁴ and the second reflects the interaction between a pathogen-encoded avirulence (avr) gene product with a plant resistance (R) gene. A key aspect of the first rise is the initiation of salicylic acid (SA) synthesis which potentiates the second rise and hence the potency of plant defense and the HR.⁵Open in a separate windowFigure 1Patterns of defense signal generation during the Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited-hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Generation of (A) H₂O₂ (●, Mur¹⁸); (B) nitric oxide (◇; Mur¹² (C) salicylic acid (SA, ■¹⁹) and (D) ethylene (○ Mur⁹) during a HR elicited by Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psph) in tobacco cv. Samsun NN. In (A) a phase where SA acts to augment the second rise in H₂O₂—the potentiation phase—is highlighted. The potentiation phase is likely to be similar to defense “priming”.⁶ Methodological details are contained within the appropriate references. (E) A possible model for biphasic defense signal regulation during the Psph-elicited HR in tobacco. During an initial phase NO and H₂O₂ act to initiate SA biosynthesis, where SA and NO act to initiate a “H₂O₂ biphasic switch”. This could initially suppress both SA and the H₂O₂ generation but subsequently acts to potentiate a second phase of H₂O₂ generation. This in turn increases SA biosynthesis which could act with NO to initiate the “C₂H₄ biphasic switch” to potentiate ethylene production. These (and other) signals contribute to initiation of the HR and SAR.This potentiation mechanism appears to be similar to defense priming; when whole plants display systemic resistance to disease as opposed to a localized resistance against pathogens. Priming can be initiated (the “primary stimulus”) following attack with a necrotizing pathogen (leading to “systemic acquired resistance”, SAR) or non-pathogenic rhizosphere bacteria (to confer “induced systemic resistance”, ISR). In the primed state a plant stimulates a range of plant defense genes, produces anti-microbial phytoalexins and deposits cell wall strengthening molecules, but only on imposition of a “secondary stimulus”.⁶ Such secondary stimuli include SA³ or PAMPs⁷ and is likely to be mechanistically similar to the potentiation step in the biphasic pattern of H₂O₂ generation (shaded in Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the two phases in the biphasic wave represent primary and secondary stimuli in priming.Highlighting a similarity between local HR-based events and priming, adds further impetus to efforts aiming to describe the underlying mechanism(s), however both phenomena remain poorly understood. Besides SA, both jasmonates and abscisic acid (ABA) have been shown to prime defenses as have a range of non-plant chemicals, with β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) being perhaps most widely used.^6,8 Mutants which fail to exhibit BABA-mediated potentiation were defective in either a cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein, a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase or an ABA biosynthetic enzyme.⁸We have recently investigated biphasic ethylene production during the HR in tobacco elicited by the nonhost HR-eliciting bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola.⁹ As with H₂O₂ generation, this pattern reflected PAMP-and AVR-dependent elicitation events and included a SA-mediated potentiation stage. Crucially, we also showed that NO was a vital component in the SA-potentiation mechanism. When this finding is integrated with our other measurements of defense signal generation in the same host-pathogen system the complexity in the signaling network is revealed (Fig. 1). NO generation (Fig. 1B) appeared to be coincident with the first rise in H₂O₂ (Fig. 1A) which initiated SA biosynthesis^10,11 and together would contribute to the first small, but transient, rise in that hormone (Fig. 1C). In line with established models⁵ this momentary rise in SA coincides with the potentiation phase (shaded in Fig. 1A) required to augment the second rise in ROS. However, ethylene production seems to be correlated poorly with the patterns of NO, H₂O₂ and SA (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, biphasic ethylene production was found to reflect PAMP and AVR-dependent recognition and included a SA-mediated potentiation step.⁹ Hence, ethylene production could be used as a post-hoc indicator of the potentiation mechanism. Therefore, our discovery that the second wave of ethylene production—a “biphasic switch”—is influenced by NO acting with SA could also be relevant to the H₂O₂ generation. Significantly, the second phases in both H₂O₂ and ethylene production occur exactly where SA and NO production coincides; in the case of H₂O₂ generation 2–4 h post challenge and with ethylene 6 h onwards (Fig. 1E).Thus, ethylene production represents a readily assayable marker to indicate perturbations in the underlying biphasic and possible priming mechanisms. As we have demonstrated, laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD) is a powerful on-line approach to determine in planta ethylene production in tobacco^9,12 but any mechanistic investigations would be greatly facilitated if the genetic resources offered by the model species Arabidopsis could be exploited.To address this, Arabidopsis Col-0 rosettes were vacuum infiltrated with either Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) avrRpm1 (HR-eliciting), the virulent Pst strain and the non-HR eliciting and non-virulent Pst hrpA strain. Ethylene production was monitored by LAPD (Fig. 2A). Significantly, Pst avrRpm1 initiated a biphasic pattern of ethylene production whose kinetics were very similar to that seen in tobacco (compare Figs. 2A with ​with1D).1D). Inoculations with Pst and Pst hrpA only displayed the first PAMP-dependent rise in ethylene production. Thus, these data establish that Arabidopsis can be used to investigate biphasic switch mechanism(s) in ethylene production during the HR and possibly defense priming. When considering such mechanisms, it is relevant to highlight the work of Foschi et al.¹³ who observed that biphasic activation of a monomeric G protein to cause phase-specific activation of different kinase cascades. Interestingly, ethylene has been noted to initiate biphasic activation of G proteins and kinases in Arabidopsis, although differing in kinetics to the phases seen during the HR.¹⁴ Further, plant defense priming has been associated with the increased accumulation of MAP kinase protein.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ethylene in the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato elicited-hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Ethylene production from 5 week old short day (8 h light 100 µmol.m².sec⁻¹) grown Arabidopsis rosette leaves which were vacuum infiltrated with bacterial suspensions (2 × 10⁶ colony forming units.ml⁻¹) of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) strains detected using laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD). Experimental details of the ethylene detection by LAPD are detailed in Mur et al.⁹ The intercellular spaces in leaves were infiltrated with the HR-eliciting strain Pst avrRpm1, (■), the virulent strain Pst (△) or the non-virulent and non-HR eliciting derivative, Pst hrpA (◇). (B) The appearance of Arabidopsis Col-0 and etr1-1 leaves at various h following injection with 2 × 10⁶ c.f.u.mL⁻¹ with of Pst avrRpm1. (C) Explants (1 cm diameter discs) from Arabidopsis leaf areas infiltrated with suspensions of Pst avrRpm1 were placed in a 1.5 cm diameter well, bathed in 1 mL de-ionized H₂O. Changes in the conductivity of the bathing solution, as an indicator of electrolyte leakage from either wild type Col-0 (◆), mutants which were compromised in ethylene signaling; etr1-1 (□), ein2-2 (▲) or which overproduced ethylene; eto2-1 (●) were measured using a conductivity meter. Methodological details are set out in Mur et al.⁹A further point requires consideration; the role of ethylene as a direct contributor to plant defense.¹⁵ The contribution of ethylene to the HR has been disputed,¹⁶ but in tobacco we have observed that altered ethylene production influenced the formation of a P. syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited HR.⁹ In Arabidopsis, cell death in the ethylene receptor mutant etr1-1 following inoculation with Pst avrRpm1 is delayed compared to wild type (Fig. 2B). When electrolyte leakage was used to quantify Pst avrRpm1 cell death, both etr1-1 and the ethylene insensitive signaling mutant ein2-1 exhibited slower death than wild-type but in the ethylene overproducing mutant eto2, cell death was augmented (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that ethylene influences the kinetics of the HR.Taking these data together we suggest that the complexity of signal interaction during the HR or in SAR/ISR could be further dissected by combining the genetic resources of Arabidopsis with measurements of ethylene production using such sensitive approaches as LAPD.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

ERECTA controls low light intensity-induced differential petiole growth independent of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2 action in Arabidopsis thaliana

Plants can respond quickly and profoundly to changes in their environment. Several species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, are capable of differential petiole growth driven upward leaf movement (hyponastic growth) to escape from detrimental environmental conditions. Recently, we demonstrated that the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like Ser/Thr kinase gene ERECTA, explains a major effect Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) for ethylene-induced hyponastic growth in Arabidopsis. Here, we demonstrate that ERECTA controls the hyponastic growth response to low light intensity treatment in a genetic background dependent manner. Moreover, we show that ERECTA affects low light-induced hyponastic growth independent of Phytochrome B and Cryptochrome 2 signaling, despite that these photoreceptors are positive regulators of low light-induced hyponastic growth.Key words: hyponastic growth, petiole, Arabidopsis, low light, ERECTA, differential growth, phytochrome B, cryptochrome 2Plants must adjust growth and reproduction to adverse environmental conditions. Among the strategies that plants employ to escape from unfavorable conditions is differential petiole growth-driven upward leaf movement, called hyponastic growth. Arabidopsis thaliana is able to exhibit a marked hyponastic response upon flooding, which is triggered by endogenous accumulation of the gaseous phytohormone ethylene.¹ Moreover, a similar response is triggered upon low light intensity perception and in response to supra-optimal temperatures.^2–5 By tilting the leaves to a more vertical position during submergence and shading, the plants restore contact with the atmosphere and light, respectively. The kinetics of the hyponastic growth response induced by the various stimuli is remarkably similar. This led to the hypothesis that shared functional genetic components may be employed to control hyponastic growth. Yet, at least part of the signaling cascades is parallel, as the hormonal control of the response differs between the stimuli. Low light-induced hyponastic growth for example does not require ethylene action.² Whereas the response to heat is antagonized by this hormone.⁵ The abiotic stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes ethylene-induced hyponastic growth and stimulates heat-induced hyponastic growth.^5,6 Moreover, ethylene-induced hyponasty does not involve auxin action⁷ whereas both heat- and low light-induced hyponasty require functional auxin signaling and transport components.^2,5In our recent paper, published in The Plant Journal,⁸ we employed Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) analysis to identify loci involved in the control of ethylene-induced hyponastic petiole growth. By analyzing induced mutants and by complementation analysis of naturally occurring mutant accessions, we found that the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like Ser/Thr kinase gene ERECTA (ER) is a positive regulator of ethylene-induced hyponastic growth and most likely is causal to one of the identified QTLs. In addition, we demonstrated that the ER dependency is not via ER mediated control of ethylene production or sensitivity.Since low light-induced hyponasty does not require ethylene action,² ER may be part of the proposed shared signaling cascade leading to hyponastic growth where ethylene and low light signals meet. Therefore, we studied low light intensity-induced hyponasty in various erecta mutants. Moreover, natural occurring er mutant accessions complemented with a functional, Col-0 derived, ER allele were tested. The response of Lan-0 (Lan-0; with functional ER) to low light was indistinguishable from the response of Landsberg erecta (Ler) (Fig. 1A). However, complemented Ler (ER-Ler) showed an enhanced response compared to Ler (Fig. 1B). The response of mutant er105 was slightly attenuated compared to the wild type Columbia-0 (Fig. 1C). Mutant er104, however, showed an indistinguishable hyponastic growth phenotype to low light compared to the wild type Wassilewskija-2 (Ws-2) (Fig. 1D). Complementation of the natural occurring erecta mutant accession Vancouver-0 (Van-0) resulted in an enhanced hyponastic growth response to low light (Fig. 1E), whereas this was not the case for Hiroshima-1 (Hir-1) (Fig. 1F). Together, these data suggest that ER acts as positive regulator of low light-induced hyponastic growth and therefore may be part of the shared signaling cascade towards differential petiole growth. Yet, the effect is strongly dependent on the genetic background since the effects were not observed in every accession tested.Open in a separate windowFigure 1ERECTA involvement in low light-induced hyponasty. Effect of exposure to low light (spectral neutral reduction in light intensity from 200 to 20 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹) on the kinetics of hyponastic petiole growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) mutant (circles) Ler and wild type (dashed line) Lan-0, (B) Ler and Ler complemented (ER-; squares) with the Col-0 ERECTA allele (ER-Ler), (C) er105 and Col-0 wild type, (D) er104 and Ws-2 wild type, (E) natural mutant Van-0 and Van-0 complemented with the Col-0 ER allele (ER-Van-0), (F) natural mutant Hir-1 and Hir-1 complemented with the Col-0 ER allele (ER-Hir-1). Petiole angles were measured using time-lapse photography and subsequent image analysis. Data is pairwise subtracted, which corrects for diurnal petiole movement in control conditions. For details on this procedure, growth conditions and materials, transformation protocol, treatments, data acquirement and all analyses see.^1,8 Error bars represent standard errors; n ≥ 12.Phytochrome B (PhyB) and Cryptochrome 2 (Cry2) photoreceptor proteins are required for a full induction of low light-induced hyponastic growth.² We transformed the phyb5 cry2 mutant9 (Ler genetic background) with Col-0 derived ER. This complementation did not restore the ability of phyb5 cry2 to induce hyponastic growth to neither ethylene (data not shown) nor low light conditions (Fig. 2A). Mutant phyb5 cry2 plants have a typical constitutive shade avoidance phenotype, reflected by severely elongated organs. This includes enhanced inflorescence and silique length and thin inflorescences (Fig. 2B-D). Complementation with ER resulted in a significant additional effect on these parameters (Fig. 2B-D). Together, this suggests that ER is not an integral part of PhyB nor Cry2 signaling with respect to (hyponastic) growth. Moreover, PhyB and Cry2 control of plant architecture does not require ER action. Rather, ER seems to mediate growth via genetic interaction with light-reliant growth mechanisms, instead of being downstream of photoreceptor action. Studies on the effects of ER on shade avoidance responses and various hormone responses, including cytokinin and auxin, led to the similar conclusion, suggesting a possible role for ER as a molecular hub coordinating light- and hormone-mediated plant growth.^10,11 One could speculate that ER fine-tunes other (than light) environmental clues with light signaling components. A comparable conclusion was drawn previously for gibberellin (GA) reliant growth mechanisms, as er enhanced the negative effect on plant size of the short internode (shi) mutation12 and er represses the positive effect of the spindly mutation in a GA independent manner.¹³Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effects of ERECTA on light signaling. (A) Effect of exposure to low light (spectral neutral reduction in light intensity from 200 to 20 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹) on the kinetics of hyponastic petiole growth of Ler (dashed lines), the photoreceptor double mutant phyb5 cry2 (circles) and this mutant complemented with the Col-0 ERECTA (ER-phyb cry2; squares). For details see legend Figure 1. (B) Plant height, (C) silique length and (D) inflorescence stem thickness of the above mentioned lines. These parameters were measured when the last flower on the plant developed a silique. Plant height was measured from root/shoot junction to inflorescence top. Stem thickness was measured ∼1 cm above the root/shoot junction with a caliper and silique lengths were measured from representative pedicels in the top ∼10 cm of the main inflorescence stem. Error bars represent standard errors; n ≥ 12. Significance levels; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns = non significant, by Students t-test.     

Ethylene-Stimulated Nutations Do Not Require ETR1 Receptor Histidine Kinase Activity

Ethylene influences the growth and development of plants through the action of receptors that have homology to bacterial two-component receptors. In bacteria these receptors function via autophosphorylation of a His residue in the kinase domain followed by phosphotransfer to a conserved Asp residue in a response regulator protein. In Arabidopsis, two of the five receptor isoforms are capable of His kinase activity. However, the role of His kinase activity and phosphotransfer is unclear in ethylene signaling. A previous study showed that ethylene stimulates nutations of the hypocotyl in etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings that are dependent on the ETR1 receptor isoform. The ETR1 receptor is the only isoform in Arabidopsis that contains both a functional His kinase domain and a receiver domain for phosphotransfer. Therefore, we examined the role that ETR1 His kinase activity and phosphotransfer plays in ethylene-stimulated nutations.Key Words: ethylene, nutations, signal transduction, receptors, histidine kinase, phosphotransfer, two component signallingThe gaseous plant hormone ethylene has a role in a variety of physiological events in higher plants such as seed germination, abscission, senescence, fruit ripening, and growth regulation.¹ In etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings, ethylene causes reduced growth of the hypocotyl and root, increased radial expansion of the hypocotyl, and increased tightening of the apical hook.^2,3Previous studies have identified components in the ethylene signaling pathway and led to an inverse-agonist model for signal transduction.^4,5 According to this model, responses to ethylene are mediated by a family of five receptors (ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, EIN4, ERS2) in Arabidopsis that have homology to bacterial two-component receptors.^6–9 In bacterial systems, two-component receptors transduce signal via the autophosphorylation of a His residue in the kinase domain, followed by the transfer of phosphate to a conserved Asp residue in the receiver domain of a response regulator protein.¹⁰ The ethylene receptors of plants can be divided into two subfamilies based on sequence homology in the ethylene-binding domains.¹¹ ETR1 and ERS1 belong to subfamily I, contain all amino acid residues needed for His kinase activity,^6,12 and show His kinase activity in vitro.^13,14 ETR2, EIN4, and ERS2 belong to subfamily II, contain degenerate His kinase domains^7,9 and have Ser/Thr kinase activity in vitro.¹⁴ ERS1 shows both His and Ser/Thr kinase activities in vitro depending on the assay conditions used.¹⁴ While the kinase domain of ETR1 appears to be required for signaling,¹⁵ kinase activity is not.^15–17 It is unclear whether or not histidine kinase activity is involved in ethylene signaling, although, this activity might be involved in growth recovery after ethylene removal.¹⁷Recently, high-resolution, time-lapse imaging revealed that prolonged treatment with ethylene stimulates nutational bending of etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls.¹⁸ Nutations are oscillatory bending movements caused by localized differential growth¹⁹ that were originally termed “circumnutations”.²⁰ Nutations have been posited to be important for seedlings to penetrate through the soil²⁰ and thus could be critical for seedling survival. In support of this hypothesis, nutations of rice roots have been reported to increase soil penetration.²¹Mutational analysis revealed that many of the known ethylene signaling components including CTR1, EIN2, EIN3 and EIL1 are involved in signaling leading to ethylene-stimulated nutations.¹⁸ Surprisingly, loss-of-function mutations in ETR1 eliminated ethylene-stimulated nutations while combinatorial loss-of-function mutations in the other four receptor isoforms led to constitutive nutations in air.¹⁸ These results support a model where all the receptors are involved in ethylene-stimulated nutations but the ETR1 receptor is required for and has a contrasting role from the other receptor isoforms in this nutation phenotype. Since the ETR1 receptor is the only receptor isoform that contains both a functional His-kinase domain and a receiver domain,^6,13,14 the roles of His kinase activity and phosphorelay in the nutation phenotype were examined in the current study.Previous work showed that the nutation phenotype in etr1-7 loss-of-function mutants could be rescued with a wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.¹⁸ Etr1-7 mutants transformed with a kinase-inactivated genomic ETR1 transgene (gETR1 (G₂)) where the two conserved glycines in the G₂ box of the histidine kinase domain (G545, G547) were changed to alanines were examined to determine if ETR1 His kinase activity is required for ethylene-stimulated nutations. This construct lacks histidine autophosphorylation in vitro.²² Figure 1 shows that ethylene stimulates nutations in etr1-7 gETR1(G₂) seedlings. The period of these nutations was 4.7 ± 1.5 h which is similar to values obtained previously for wild-type seedlings (4.7 ± 1h) and somewhat longer than etr1-7 seedlings transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 (3.2 ± 0.6 h). However, the amplitude of these nutations (3.7 ± 1.0°) was approximately half that of nutations previously observed in wild-type seedlings (9.1 ± 6.0°) as well as etr1-7 seedlings transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 (8.2 ± 3.6°). This suggests that ETR1 histidine kinase activity is not required for ethylene-stimulated nutations but might have a role in modulating nutation amplitudes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ethylene stimulates nutations of etr1-7 seedlings transformed with a kinase-inactivated ETR1 transgene. The hypocotyl angles for four etr1-7 mutants transformed with a kinase-inactivated genomic ETR1 transgene (gETR1(G₂)) are shown. Transformants were obtained from Eric Schaller and have been described previously.²² In this and the following figure, etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were imaged from the side at 15 min intervals while growing along a vertically orientated agar plate and the hypocotyl angle measured as described previously.¹⁸ Black and gray lines are used to help distinguish the movements of individual seedlings. All seedlings were grown in the presence of 5 µM AVG to block biosynthesis of ethylene by the seedlings. Seedlings were grown in air for 2 h prior to treatment with 10 µL L⁻¹ ethylene (Open in a separate window).To determine whether phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1 is required for the nutation phenotype, seedlings deficient in ethylene receptor isoforms containing a receiver domain (ETR1, ETR2, EIN4) were transformed with a mutant ETR1 transgene lacking the conserved Asp₆₅₉ required for phosphotransfer (getr1-[D]). Previous work showed that etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple loss-of-function mutant seedlings failed to nutate and this nutation phenotype could be rescued when these mutants were transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.¹⁸ Similarly, transformation of the etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple mutants with getr1-[D] rescued the nutation phenotype in most seedlings observed (Fig. 2). However, some seedlings (four of the eleven observed) failed to nutate. The reason for this variable rescue is unclear but could reflect differences in expression levels of the mutant transgene in individual plants. Alternatively, this variable rescue could reflect functional differences between the mutant and wild-type transgene suggesting a modulating role for phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1. Two independent lines were observed with similar results. Of those that did nutate, the period of nutations was 5.0 ± 1.2 h and the amplitude 7.6 ± 3.8° which is similar to values obtained previously for wild-type plants as well as plants transformed with a wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.¹⁸Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ethylene stimulates nutations of etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 seedlings transformed with an ETR1 transgene mutated at Asp₆₅₉. The hypocotyl angles from seven etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple mutants transformed with an ETR1 transgene mutated at Asp₆₅₉ (getr1[D]) are shown in two panels. One seedling in (A) (black) had no measurable nutations while one in (B) (black) had very small nutations.Conclusions from this and the previous study are that the ETR1 receptor has a unique role in ethylene-stimulated nutations. However, this role does not require either histidine kinase activity or phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1.     

Membrane localization diversity of TPK channels and their physiological role

Potassium (K) is one of the major nutrients that is essential for plant growth and development. The majority of cellular K⁺ resides in the vacuole and tonoplast K⁺ channels of the TPK (Two Pore K) family are main players in cellular K⁺ homeostasis. All TPK channels were previously reported to be expressed in the tonoplast of the large central lytic vacuole (LV) except for one isoform in Arabidopsis that resides in the plasma membrane. However, plant cells often contain more than one type of vacuole that coexist in the same cell. We recently showed that two TPK isoforms (OsTPKa and OsTPKb) from Oryza sativa localize to different vacuoles with OsTPKa predominantly found in the LV tonoplast and OsTPKb primarily in smaller compartments that resemble small vacuoles (SVs). Our study further revealed that it is the C-terminal domain that determines differential targeting of OsTPKa and OsTPKb. Three C-terminal amino acids were particularly relevant for targeting TPKs to their respective endomembranes. In this addendum we further evaluate how the different localization of TPKa and TPKb impact on their physiological role and how TPKs provide a potential tool to study the physiology of different types of vacuole.Key words: TPK channels, small vacuoles, vacuolar targeting, potassiumThe roles of plant vacuolar K⁺ channels are diverse and include potassium homeostasis, turgor regulation and responses to abiotic stress. Vacuolar K⁺-selective channels belong to two-pore K⁺ (TPK) channel families which have been found in genomes of many plant species such as Arabidopsis, poplar, Physcomitrella, Eucalyptus, barley, potato, rice and tobacco (Fig. 1). TPKs have structural similarity to mammalian “tandem P domain” channels with a secondary structure that contains four transmembrane domains and two pore regions (Fig. 2).^1–5 TPK channels have pore regions with a GYGD signature that endows K⁺ selectivity and a variable number of Ca²⁺ binding EF domains in the C terminus.^3–8 One of the best characterized members of the TPK family is AtTPK1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. AtTPK1 activity is voltage independent but sensitive to cytosolic Ca²⁺, cytosolic pH and N-terminal phosphorylation by 14-3-3 proteins.^5,6,8,9 In Arabidopsis, AtTPK1 expresses in the large lytic vacuole (LV) and plays roles in cellular K⁺ homeostasis, K⁺-release during stomatal closure and seed germination.^4,5 Other members of the Arabidopsis TPK family (AtTPK2, AtTPK3, AtTPK5) have been shown to localize to the LV but also showed some expression in smaller, vesicle-like, compartments.⁴ However, none of these isoforms appears to form functional channels in planta although our experiments with heterologous expression of AtTPK3 and AtTPK5 in the K⁺ uptake deficient E. coli LB2003 demonstrates complementation of bacterial growth phenotype (Isayenkov S, et al. unpublished results). Equally intriguing, is the plasma membrane localization of the Arabidopsis TPK4 isoform, in spite of its sequence being very similar to that of other TPKs.¹⁰Open in a separate windowFigure 1Phylogenetic tree of plant TPKs. The three main clusters of TPKs comprise: Cluster 1 with AtTPK1-like channels; Cluster 2 with AtTPK3/TPK5-like channels; Cluster 3 with barley HvTPKb. Bootstrap analysis was performed using ‘Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, MEGA4’ software available at www.megasoftware.net/mega4/megaOpen in a separate windowFigure 2Two-pore potassium channel secondary structure. TPK channels comprise four transmembrane domains (1–4) and two pore regions (P) per subunit. Functional channels are formed from two subunits. In most TPKs, both P regions contain a K⁺ selectivity signature, GYGD. However, the tobacco NtTPKa isoform has different motifs in the second P domain. In the N terminal region, TPKs have a 14-3-3 binding domain that impact on channel activity, with the binding of 14-3-3 protein leading to channel activation. C-termini of TPKs show a varying number of putative Ca²⁺ binding “EF hands” which may vary from zero to two.     

Regulation of stomatal opening by the guard cell expansin AtEXPA1

Stomatal movement is strictly regulated by various intracellular and extracellular factors in response environmental signals. In our recent study, we found that an Arabidopsis guard cell expressed expansin, AtEXPA1, regulates stomatal opening by altering the structure of the guard cell wall. This addendum proposes a mechanism by which guard cell expansins regulate stomatal movement.Key words: expansin, stomatal movement, AtEXPA1, guard cell, wall looseningStomatal movement is the most popular model system for cellular signaling transduction research. A complicated complex containing many proteins has been proposed to control stomatal responses to outside stimuli. The known regulation factors are primarily located in the nucleus, cytoplasm, plasma membrane and other intracellular organelles.^1,2 Although the cell wall structure of the stomata is different from that of other cells,^3,4 the presence of stomatal movement regulation factors in the cell wall has seldom been reported in reference ⁵. In our previous work, we found that extracellular calmodulin stimulates a cascade of intracellular signaling events to regulate stomatal movement.⁶ The involvement of this signaling pathway is the first evidence that cell wall proteins play an important role in regulation of stomatal opening. Cell wall-modifying factors constitute a major portion of cell wall proteins. However, the role of these factors in the regulation of stomatal movement is not yet known.Expansins are nonenzymatic proteins that participate in cell wall loosening.^7–9 Expansins were first identified as “acid-growth” factors because they have much higher activities at acidic pHs.^10,11 It has been reported that expansins play important roles in plant cell growth, fruit softening, root hair emergence and other developmental processes in which cell wall loosening is involved.^7–9,12,13 Wall loosening is an essential step in guard cell swelling and the role of stomatal expansins was investigated. AtEXPA1 is an Arabidopsis guard-cell-specific expansin.^13,14 Over-expressing AtEXPA1 increases the rate of light-induced stomatal opening,^14,15 while a potential inhibitor of expansin activity, AtEXPA1 antibody, reduces the sensitivity of stomata to stimuli.¹⁴ We showed that the transpiration rate and the photosynthesis rate in plant lines overexpressing AtEXPA1 were nearly two times the rates for wild-type plants (Fig. 1). These in plant data revealed that expansins accelerated stomatal opening under normal physiological conditions. In addition, the increases in the transpiration and photosynthesis rates strongly suggested the possibility of exploiting expansin-regulated stomatal sensitivity to modify plant drought tolerance. Compared with the effect of hydrolytic cell wall enzymes, the destruction of cell wall structures induced by expansins is minimal. In addition, it is very difficult to directly observe the changes in the guard cell wall structure caused by expansins during stomatal movement. Our recent work showed that, in AtEXPA1-overexpressing plants, the volumetric elastic modulus is lower than in wild-type plants,¹⁴ which indicates the wall structure was loosened and that the cell wall was easier to extend. Taken together, our data suggest that expansins participate in the regulation of stomatal movement by modifying the cell walls of guard cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effects of AtEXPA1 overexpression on transpiration rates and photosynthesis rates. The transpiration rate (left) and photosynthesis rate (right) of wild-type and transgenic AtEXPA1 lines were measured at 10:00 AM in the greenhouse after being watered overnight. The illumination intensity was 180 µmol/m²·s. Bars represent the standard error of the mean of at least five plants per line.It is well known that the activation of proton-pumping ATPase (H⁺-ATPase) in the plasma membrane is an early and essential step in stomatal opening.¹⁶ The action of the pump results in an accumulation of H⁺ outside of the cell, increases the inside-negative electrical potential across the plasma membrane and drives potassium uptake through the voltage-gated, inward-rectifying K⁺ channels.^17–19 The main function of the H⁺ pump is well accepted to create an electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane; however, the other result is the acidification of the guard cell wall, which may also contribute to stomatal opening. A possible mechanism responsible for this effect is as follows. Expansins are in an inactive state when the stomata are in the resting state. Stomatal opening signals induce wall acidification and activate expansins. Then, the expansins move along with cellulose microfibrils and transiently break down hydrogen bonding between hemicellulose and the surface of cellulose microfibrils,^20,21 facilitating the slippage of cell wall polymers under increasing guard cell turgor pressure. The guard cell then swells and the stomata open (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model of how guard cell wall expansins regulate stomatal opening. Environmental stimuli, e.g., light, activate guard cell plasma membrane H⁺-ATPases to pump H⁺ into the extracellular wall space. The accumulation H⁺ acidifies the cell wall and induces the activation of expansin. The active expansin disrupts non-covalent bonding between cellulose microfibrils and matrix glucans to enable the slippage of the cell wall. The wall is loosened coincident with guard cell swelling and without substantial breakdown of the structure.Although our results indicate that AtEXPA1 regulates stomatal movement, the biochemical and structural mechanism by which AtEXPA1 loosens the cell wall remains to be discovered. It remains to figure out the existing of other expansins or coordinators involving in this process. In addition, determining the roles of expansins and the guard cell wall in stomatal closing is another main goal of future research.