Aluminum induced proteome changes in tomato cotyledons

Cotyledons of tomato seedlings that germinated in a 20 µM AlK(SO₄)₂ solution remained chlorotic while those germinated in an aluminum free medium were normal (green) in color. Previously, we have reported the effect of aluminum toxicity on root proteome in tomato seedlings (Zhou et al.¹). Two dimensional DIGE protein analysis demonstrated that Al stress affected three major processes in the chlorotic cotyledons: antioxidant and detoxification metabolism (induced), glyoxylate and glycolytic processes (enhanced), and the photosynthetic and carbon fixation machinery (suppressed).Key words: aluminum, cotyledons, proteome, tomatoDifferent biochemical processes occur depending on the developmental stages of cotyledons. During early seed germination, before the greening of the cotyledons, glyoxysomes enzymes are very active. Fatty acids are converted to glucose via the gluconeogenesis pathway.^2,3 In greening cotyledons, chloroplast proteins for photosynthesis and leaf peroxisomal enzymes in the glycolate pathway for photorespiration are metabolized.^2–4 Enzymes involved in regulatory mechanisms such as protein kinases, protein phosphatases, and mitochondrial enzymes are highly expressed.^3,5,6The chlorotic cotyledons are similar to other chlorotic counterparts in that both contains lower levels of chlorophyll, thus the photosynthetic activities are not as active. In order to understand the impact of Al on tomato cotyledon development, a comparative proteome analysis was performed using 2D-DIGE following the as previously described procedure.¹ Some proteins accumulated differentially in Al-treated (chlorotic) and untreated cotyledons (Fig. 1). Mass spectrometry of tryptic digestion fragments of the proteins followed by database search has identified some of the differentially expressed proteins (Open in a separate windowFigure 1Image of protein spots generated by Samspot analysis of Al treated and untreated tomato cotyledons proteomes separated on 2D-DIGE.

Table 1

Proteins identified from tomato cotyledons of seeds germinating in Al-solution

Endocytic Accessory Factors and Regulation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis

Up to 60 different proteins are recruited to the site of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in an ordered sequence. These accessory proteins have roles during all the different stages of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. First, they participate in the initiation of the endocytic event, thereby determining when and where endocytic vesicles are made; later they are involved in the maturation of the clathrin coat, recruitment of specific cargo molecules, bending of the membrane, and finally in scission and uncoating of the nascent vesicle. In addition, many of the accessory components are involved in regulating and coupling the actin cytoskeleton to the endocytic membrane. We will discuss the different accessory components and their various roles. Most of the data comes from studies performed with cultured mammalian cells or yeast cells. The process of endocytosis is well conserved between these different organisms, but there are also many interesting differences that may shed light on the mechanistic principles of endocytosis.Receptor-mediated endocytosis is the process by which eukaryotic cells concentrate and internalize cell surface receptors from the plasma membrane into small (∼50 nm– ∼100 nm diameter) membrane vesicles (Chen et al. 2011; McMahon and Boucrot 2011; Weinberg and Drubin 2012). This mechanism has been studied extensively in mammalian tissue culture cells and in yeast, and despite the evolutionary distance between yeast and mammalian cells the mechanism of receptor-mediated endocytosis in the respective cell types show remarkable similarities. Indeed many of the ∼60 endocytic accessory proteins (EAPs) found in yeast have homologs in mammalian cells, although both cell types also have unique EAPs (McMahon and Boucrot 2011; Weinberg and Drubin 2012).In the following, we briefly describe known yeast and mammalian EAPs (Sigismund et al. 2012; see also Bökel and Brand 2013; Cosker and Segal 2014; Di Fiore and von Zastrow 2014).

Table 1.

Key endocytic proteins in mammals and in yeast

Faunistic and bibliographical inventory of the Psychodinae moth-flies of North Africa (Diptera,Psychodidae)

All published records for the 49 species of moth flies known from North Africa are reviewed and discussed: Morocco (27 species), Algeria (33 species), Tunisia (18 species) and Egypt (five species). In addition, records of seven species of Psychodinae new to the fauna of Morocco are added, of which three are new mentions for North Africa (Table ​(Table1)1) and one is a new record for Egypt. Telmatoscopus squamifer Tonnoir, 1922 is transferred to the genus Iranotelmatoscopus Ježek, 1987, comb. n. Satchelliella reghayana Boumezzough & Vaillant, 1987 is transferred to the genus Pneumia Enderlein, 1935, comb. n. Pneumia aberrans Tonnoir, 1922 is transferred to the subgenus Logima.

Table 1.

Species (in alphabetical order) of Psychodinae known from the North African countries. Libya has been omitted because no information exists in the literature from Libya.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine: a humanitarian tragedy and a tragedy for science

The Invasion of Ukraine prompts us to support our Ukranian colleagues but also to keep open communication with the Russian scientists who oppose the war.

In the eyes of the civilized world, Russia has already lost the war: politically, it is becoming ever more isolated; economically as the sanctions take an enormous toll; militarily as the losses of the Russian army mount. In contrast, the courage of Ukrainian people fighting for their independence has united the Western world that is providing enormous support for those Ukrainians who fight the Russian invasion and those who have fled their war‐torn country. Once this war is over, Ukraine will have to heal the wounds of war, reunite families, restore its economy, reestablish infrastructure, and rebuild science and education. Russia will have to restore its dignity and overcome its self‐inflicted isolation.Europe’s unity in condemning Russia’s war of aggression and showing its solidarity with Ukraine has been impressive. This includes not the least welcoming and accommodating millions of refugees. We, the scientific community in Europe, have a moral obligation to help Ukrainian students and colleagues by providing safe space to study and to continue their research. First, European research organizations and funding agencies should develop strategies to support them in the years to come. Second, efforts by EMBO, research funders, universities, and research institutions to support Ukrainian students and scientists are necessary. As a first priority, dedicated and unbureaucratic short‐term scholarship and grant programs are required to accommodate Ukrainian scientists; such programs have been already initiated by many organizations, for example, by EMBO, Volkswagen Stiftung, Max Planck Society, and the ERC among others. These help Ukrainian scientists to stay connected to research and become integrated into the European research landscape. In the long‐term and after the war, this aid should be complemented by funding for research centers of excellence in Ukraine, to which scientists could then return.Even though the priority must be to help Ukrainians, we must also think of students and colleagues in Russia who oppose the war and are affected by the sanctions. As the Iron Curtain closes again, we have to think differently about our ongoing and future collaborations. Although freezing most, if not all, research collaborations with official Russian organizations is justified, it would be a mistake to extend these sanctions to all scientists and students. There is already an exodus of Russian and Belarusian scholars, which will only accelerate in the next months and years, and accepting scientists who ask for political asylum will be beneficial for Europe.The fraction of Russian society in open opposition to the war is, unfortunately, smaller than that officially in support of it. At the beginning of the war, a number of Russian scientists published an open letter on the internet, in which they condemn this war (https://t‐invariant.org/2022/02/we‐are‐against‐war/). They clearly state that "The responsibility for unleashing a new war in Europe lies entirely with Russia. There is no rational justification for this war”, and “demand an immediate halt to all military operations directed against Ukraine". At the same time, other prominent Russian science and education officials signed the “Statement of the Russian Union of University Rectors (Provosts)”, which expressed unwavering support for Russia, its president and its Army and their goal to “to achieve demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine and thus to defend ourselves from the ever‐growing military threat” (https://www.rsr‐online.ru/news/2022‐god/obrashchenie‐rossiyskogo‐soyuza‐rektorov1/).Inevitably, Russian scientists must decide themselves how to live and continue their scientific work under the increasingly tight surveillance of the Kremlin regime. History is repeating itself. Not long ago, during the Cold War, Soviet scientists were largely isolated from the international research community and worked in government‐controlled research. In some fields, no one knew what they were working on or where. However, even in those dark times, courageous individuals such as Andrei Sakharov spoke out against the regime and tried to educate the next generation about the importance of free will. Many Soviet geneticists had been arrested under Stalin’s regime of terror and as a result of Lysenkoism and were executed or sent to the Gulag or had to emigrate, such as Nikolaj Timofeev‐Resovskij, one of the great geneticists of his time and an opponent of communism. As a result of sending dissident scientists to Siberia, great educational institutions were created in the region, which trained many famous scientists. History tells us that it is impossible to kill free will and the search for truth.The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a major humanitarian tragedy and a tragedy for science at many levels. Our hope is that the European science community, policymakers, and funders will be prepared to continue and expand support for our colleagues from Ukraine and eventually help to rebuild the bridges with Russian science that have been torn down.This commentary has been endorsed and signed by the EMBO Young Investigators and former Young Investigators listed below.

All signatories are current and former EMBO Young Investigators and endorse the statements in this article.

Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection,Mate Choice,and Sexual Conflict

Genital coevolution between the sexes is expected to be common because of the direct interaction between male and female genitalia during copulation. Here we review the diverse mechanisms of genital coevolution that include natural selection, female mate choice, male–male competition, and how their interactions generate sexual conflict that can lead to sexually antagonistic coevolution. Natural selection on genital morphology will result in size coevolution to allow for copulation to be mechanically possible, even as other features of genitalia may reflect the action of other mechanisms of selection. Genital coevolution is explicitly predicted by at least three mechanisms of genital evolution: lock and key to prevent hybridization, female choice, and sexual conflict. Although some good examples exist in support of each of these mechanisms, more data on quantitative female genital variation and studies of functional morphology during copulation are needed to understand more general patterns. A combination of different approaches is required to continue to advance our understanding of genital coevolution. Knowledge of the ecology and behavior of the studied species combined with functional morphology, quantitative morphological tools, experimental manipulation, and experimental evolution have been provided in the best-studied species, all of which are invertebrates. Therefore, attention to vertebrates in any of these areas is badly needed.Of all the evolutionary interactions between the sexes, the mechanical interaction of genitalia during copulation in species with internal fertilization is perhaps the most direct. For this reason alone, coevolution between genital morphologies of males and females is expected. Morphological and genetic components of male and female genitalia have been shown to covary in many taxa (Sota and Kubota 1998; Ilango and Lane 2000; Arnqvist and Rowe 2002; Brennan et al. 2007; Rönn et al. 2007; Kuntner et al. 2009; Tatarnic and Cassis 2010; Cayetano et al. 2011; Evans et al. 2011, 2013; Simmons and García-González 2011; Yassin and Orgogozo 2013; and see examples in

Endoplasmic Reticulum Targeting and Insertion of Tail-Anchored Membrane Proteins by the GET Pathway

Hundreds of eukaryotic membrane proteins are anchored to membranes by a single transmembrane domain at their carboxyl terminus. Many of these tail-anchored (TA) proteins are posttranslationally targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane for insertion by the guided-entry of TA protein insertion (GET) pathway. In recent years, most of the components of this conserved pathway have been biochemically and structurally characterized. Get3 is the pathway-targeting factor that uses nucleotide-linked conformational changes to mediate the delivery of TA proteins between the GET pretargeting machinery in the cytosol and the transmembrane pathway components in the ER. Here we focus on the mechanism of the yeast GET pathway and make a speculative analogy between its membrane insertion step and the ATPase-driven cycle of ABC transporters.The mechanism of membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been extensively studied for many years (Shao and Hegde 2011). From this work, the signal recognition particle (SRP)/Sec61 pathway has emerged as a textbook example of a cotranslational membrane insertion mechanism (Grudnik et al. 2009). The SRP binds a hydrophobic segment (either a cleavable amino-terminal signal sequence or a transmembrane domain) immediately after it emerges from the ribosomal exit tunnel. This results in a translational pause that persists until SRP engages its receptor in the ER and delivers the ribosome-nascent chain complex to the Sec61 channel. Last, the Sec61 channel enables protein translocation into the ER lumen along with partitioning of hydrophobic transmembrane domains into the lipid bilayer through the Sec61 lateral gate (Rapoport 2007).Approximately 5% of all eukaryotic membrane proteins have an ER targeting signal in a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain that emerges from the ribosome exit tunnel following completion of protein synthesis and is not recognized by the SRP (Stefanovic and Hegde 2007). Nonetheless, because hydrophobic peptides in the cytoplasm are prone to aggregation and subject to degradation by quality control systems (Hessa et al. 2011), these tail-anchored (TA) proteins still have to be specifically recognized, shielded from the aqueous environment, and guided to the ER membrane for insertion. In the past five years, the guided-entry of TA proteins (GET) pathway has come to prominence as the major machinery for performing these tasks and the enabler of many key cellular processes mediated by TA proteins including vesicle fusion, membrane protein insertion, and apoptosis. This research has rapidly yielded biochemical and structural insights (​and2)2) into many of the GET pathway components (Hegde and Keenan 2011; Chartron et al. 2012a; Denic 2012). In particular, Get3 is an ATPase that uses metabolic energy to bridge recognition of TA proteins by upstream pathway components with TA protein recruitment to the ER for membrane insertion. However, the precise mechanisms of nucleotide-dependent TA protein binding to Get3 and how the GET pathway inserts tail anchors into the membrane are still poorly understood. Here, we provide an overview of the budding yeast GET pathway with emphasis on mechanistic insights that have come from structural studies of its membrane-associated steps and make a speculative juxtaposition with the ABC transporter mechanism.

Table 1.

A catalog of GET pathway component structures

Diminished Susceptibility to Cefoperazone/Sulbactam and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Enterobacteriaceae Due to Narrow-Spectrum β-Lactamases as Well as Omp Mutation

Cefoperazone/sulbactam (CSL) and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) are commonly used in clinical practice in China because of their excellent antimicrobial activity. CSL and TZP-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae are typically resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone (CRO). However, 11 nonrepetitive Enterobacteriaceae strains, which were resistant to CSL and TZP yet susceptible to CRO, were collected from January to December 2020. Antibiotic susceptibility tests and whole-genome sequencing were conducted to elucidate the mechanism for this rare phenotype. Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that all isolates were amoxicillin/clavulanic-acid resistant and sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime, cefepime/tazobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam. Whole-genome sequencing revealed three of seven Klebsiella pneumoniae strains harbored bla_SHV-1 only, and four harbored bla_SHV-1 and bla_TEM-1B. Two Escherichia coli strains carried bla_TEM-1B only, while two Klebsiella oxytoca isolates harbored bla_OXY-1-3 and bla_OXY-1-1, respectively. No mutation in the β-lactamase gene and promoter sequence was found. Outer membrane protein (Omp) gene detection revealed that numerous missense mutations of OmpK36 and OmpK37 were found in all strains of K. pneumoniae. Numerous missense mutations of OmpK36 and OmpK35 and OmpK37 deficiency were found in one K. oxytoca strain, and no OmpK gene was found in the other. No Omp mutations were found in E. coli isolates. These results indicated that narrow spectrum β-lactamases, TEM-1, SHV-1, and OXY-1, alone or in combination with Omp mutation, contributed to the resistance to CSL and TZP in CRO-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae.Antibiotic susceptibility tests

Use of methotrexate therapy is not associated with decreased prevalence of metabolic syndrome

With great interest, we read the article by Toms and colleagues [1] in the previous issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, in which they assessed prevalences of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Moreover, they identified demographic and clinical factors that may be associated with MetS. Toms and colleagues found prevalences of up to 45% of MetS and demonstrated older age and health status (health assessment questionnaire) to be associated with MetS irrespectively of the definition used. Of most interest, an association between methotrexate (MTX) use and decreased presence of MetS was observed in patients more than 60 years of age. The investigators hypothesized that this may be attributed to a drug-specific effect (and not to an anti-inflammatory effect) either by changing levels of adenosine, which is known to interact with glucose and lipid metabolism, or by an indirect effect mediated through concomitant folic acid administration, thereby decreasing homocysteine levels.Recently, we also examined the prevalence of MetS in (a subgroup of) RA patients in the CARRÉ investigation, a prospective cohort study on prevalent and incident cardiovascular disease and its underlying cardiovascular risk factors [2]. The findings of Toms and colleagues stimulated us to perform additional analyses in our total study population (n = 353).The prevalences of MetS were 35% and 25% (Table ​(Table1)1) according to criteria of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) 2004 and NCEP 2001, respectively. In multivariate backward regression analyses, we found significant associations between body mass index, pulse rate, creatinine levels, hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus and the presence of MetS independently of the criteria used (Table ​(Table2).2). However, an independent association between single use of MTX or use of MTX in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, on the one hand, and a decreased prevalence of MetS, on the other hand, could not be demonstrated (even in the subgroup of patients over the age of 60).

Table 1

Characteristics of the study population

Allelic frequency and genotypes of prion protein at codon 136 and 171 in Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds

PrP genotypes at codons 136 and 171 in 120 Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds were studied using allele-specific PCR amplification and compared with the well-known sheep breeds in North America, the United States and Europe. The frequency of V allele and VV genotype at codon 136 of Ghezel sheep breed was significantly lower than AA and AV. At codon 171, the frequency of allele H was significantly lower than Q and R. Despite the similarities of PrP genotypes at codons 136 and 171 between Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds and some of the studied breeds, significant differences were found with others. Planning of effective breeding control and successful eradication of susceptible genotypes in Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds will not be possible unless the susceptibility of various genotypes in Ghezel sheep breeds to natural or experimental scrapie has been elucidated.Key words: scrapie, Ghezel sheep breed, PrP genotyping, allele specific amplification, codon 136, codon 171Scrapie was first described in England in 1732,¹ and it is an infectious neurodegenerative fatal disease of sheep and goats belonging to the group of transmissible subacute spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), along with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), chronic wasting disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.^2,3 The term prion, proteinaceous infectious particles, coined by Stanley B. Prusiner, was introduced, and he presents the idea that the causal agent is a protein.⁴ Prion proteins are discovered in two forms, the wild-type form (PrP^c) and the mutant form (PrP^Sc).⁵ Although scrapie is an infectious disease, the susceptibility of sheep is influenced by genotypes of the prion protein (PrP) gene.^2,6 Researchers have found that the PrP allelic variant alanine/arginine/arginine (ARR) at codons 136, 154 and 171 is associated with resistance to scrapie in several breeds.^7–14 Most of the sheep populations in the Near East and North African Region (84% of the total population of 255 million) are raised in Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Sudan, Algeria, Morocco, Afghanistan, Syria and Somalia.¹⁵ In 2003, the Iranian sheep population was estimated at 54,000,000 head. The Ghezel sheep breed, which also is known as Kizil-Karaman, Mor-Karaman, Dugli, Erzurum, Chacra, Chagra, Chakra, Gesel, Gezel, Kazil, Khezel, Khizel, Kizil, Qezel, Qizil and Turkish Brown, originated in northwestern Iran and northeastern Turkey. By considering sheep breeds as one of the main sources of meat, dairy products and related products, a global screening attempt is started in different areas. In compliance with European Union Decision 2003/100/EC, each member state has introduced a breeding program to select for resistance to TSEs in sheep populations to increase the frequency of the ARR allele. A similar breeding program is established in United States and Canada. The Near East and North African Region still needs additional programs to help the global plan of eradication of scrapie-susceptible genotypes. The current study was the first to assess the geographical and molecular variation of codons 136 and 171 polymorphism between Iranian Ghezel sheep breed and well-known sheep breeds.Polymorphism at codon 136 is associated with susceptibility to scrapie in both experimental and natural models.^10,11,13,16 17 and Austrian Carynthian sheep.¹⁸ Swiss White Alpine showed higher frequency of allele V at position 136 than Swiss Oxford Down, Swiss Black-Brown Mountain and Valais Blacknose.¹⁹ Comparison of polymorphism at codon 136 in the current study with some of other breeds (20 some flock of Hampshire sheep²¹ with current study, but the frequency of it is higher than that of some other breeds.

Table 1

Comparison of PrP allelic and genotype frequencies at codon 136 in different breeds

Does an Eye-Hand Coordination Test Have Added Value as Part of Talent Identification in Table Tennis? A Validity and Reproducibility Study

This study investigated the added value, i.e. discriminative and concurrent validity and reproducibility, of an eye-hand coordination test relevant to table tennis as part of talent identification. Forty-three table tennis players (7–12 years) from national (n = 13), regional (n = 11) and local training centres (n = 19) participated. During the eye-hand coordination test, children needed to throw a ball against a vertical positioned table tennis table with one hand and to catch the ball correctly with the other hand as frequently as possible in 30 seconds. Four different test versions were assessed varying the distance to the TotalNationalRegionalLocalTotal43131119Boys268810Girls17539Age (years)10.4±1.410.9±1.510.4±1.510.1±1.47 year olds1--18 year olds51139 year olds3-3-10 year olds1232711 year olds1151512 year olds11443Length (cm)149±11150±12150±12148±10Weight (kg )38±837±737±738±9Right-handed359917Left-handed8422Training (hours*week-1)6 (0–20)11 (7–20)7 (4–11)2 (0–3)Competition (points)173 (−52–430)297 (144–430)188 (72–317)36 (−52–130)Open in a separate windowData are frequencies, except for age, length and weight (years±SD), and training and competition (mean (range)).     

Demonstrated and inferred metabolism associated with cytosolic lipid droplets

Cytosolic lipid droplets were considered until recently to be rather inert particles of stored neutral lipid. Largely through proteomics is it now known that droplets are dynamic organelles and that they participate in several important metabolic reactions as well as trafficking and interorganellar communication. In this review, the role of droplets in metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the fly Drosophila melanogaster, and several mammalian sources are discussed, particularly focusing on those reactions shared by these organisms. From proteomics and older work, it is clear that droplets are important for fatty acid and sterol biosynthesis, fatty acid activation, and lipolysis. However, many droplet-associated enzymes are predicted to span a membrane two or more times, which suggests either that droplet structure is more complex than the current model posits, or that there are tightly bound membranes, particularly derived from the endoplasmic reticulum, which account for the association of several of these proteins.Cytosolic lipid droplets, originally thought to be simply coalesced neutral lipids waiting for lipolysis at metabolic demand, are now known to be considerably more complicated both structurally and functionally. There is general agreement that droplets are comprised of a core of neutral lipids, principally triglycerides and steryl esters, surrounded by a leaflet of phospholipids into which are embedded a specific subset of cellular proteins, the most abundant of which are members of the PAT family (see below) in animal cells (1). However, this model is probably too simple; there is evidence from physical probes of droplets isolated from yeast mutants unable to synthesize triglycerides or steryl esters that these two molecular families are partially segregated within the core, with thin shells of steryl esters forming concentric hollow spheres around an inner core composed principally of triglycerides (2).The next layer of complexity is the functional inhomogeneity of droplets. Subsets of droplets within the same cells exist with different populations of PAT proteins, differentiating among different sizes, ages, and levels of metabolic activity (3, 4). Perhaps most surprisingly, droplets may be comprised, at least in some cases, not of the layered core-phospholipid shell architecture at all but a knot of tightly woven endoplasmic reticulum (ER) surrounded by secreted neutral lipid, itself encased with a single leaflet. Such a model is based on electron microscopic thin sections (5), freeze fracture-immunogold evidence (6), immunohistochemical studies of ER luminal proteins within the droplet (7), and the identification of these proteins, notably ER chaperones, in several proteomic studies. Although certainly, such a complex structure must obey physical laws governing aqueous interactions with hydrophobic lipids and artifacts in processing for electron microscopy do occur, it may be best at present to keep an open mind and consider that droplets may not have the same structure among tissues and that they may take multiple physical forms in rapid order as they dynamically perform their functions.What are these functions? The most obvious one is lipid metabolism, namely the biogenesis and breakdown of the neutral lipids contained within the droplet. Although this conclusion predates proteomic studies (8), these recent studies have revealed the breadth and conservation of metabolic reactions that occur at or near the droplet surface, the subject of this review. Moreover, proteomics has demonstrated the surprising fact that droplets are likely to be very active in organellar communication because they are replete in rab proteins and other trafficking molecules. Our knowledge from proteomic studies of droplet trafficking and communication is discussed separately in this thematic review series.A major caveat must be kept in mind when evaluating droplet proteomics data: besides droplet trafficking through transient interactions with vesicles or target organelles such as early endosomes (9), droplets make extensive, tight, and long-lasting synapses with the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and peroxisomes (10, 11). The fact that ER, mitochondrial, peroxisomal, and a few plasma membrane proteins are found with such high frequency in the droplet proteome probably reflects these tight interorganellar interactions, perhaps similar to the mitochondrially associated membranes (MAMs) that link mitochondria with ER (12). The molecular basis for droplet-mediated synapses are not yet known. Besides the frequent occurrence of specific nondroplet organelle proteins in the droplet proteome, adventitious contamination of droplets is unlikely in view of the unique density of droplets that allow their flotation to the top of aqueous buffers and density gradients after centrifugation while all other cell components sink (which also permits several washes with high recovery), and the nonrandom coisolation of subsets of proteins from other organelles, such as the β-oxidation peroxisomal enzymes (10), which suggests specialized regions for metabolically-productive droplet interactions at the synapses.Droplet-ER interactions are a special case; it is the rule rather than the exception that enzymes of lipid metabolism that are found in the droplet proteome are also found to varying extents in the ER. This has been well documented in yeast through genome-wide green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagging (13, 14). Erg6p, an enzyme in the latter part of the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway, is the only droplet protein in the pathway with a near-exclusive droplet localization in yeast; Erg1p, Erg7p, and Erg 27p are dually localized, and the pattern changes depending on metabolic state. Whether this general rule is specific for yeast, in which droplets remain on the ER surface (15), is not yet clear. However, several examples already exist in mammalian cells: cytochrome b5 reductase (DT diaphorase) and various sterol dehydrogenases (see 12).

TABLE 1.

Metabolic functions of droplets as revealed by proteomics

Comparative Pathobiology of Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus and Related Primate Rhadinoviruses

With the emergence of the AIDS epidemic over the last 2 decades and the more recent identification of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV, Human herpesvirus 8), the genera of rhadinoviruses have gained importance as a family of viruses with oncogenic potential. First recognized in New World primates more than 30 y ago, the rhadinoviruses Saimiriine herpesvirus 2 and Ateline herpesvirus 2 have well-described transforming capabilities. Recently several new species-specific rhadinoviruses of Old World primates have been described, including retroperitoneal fibromatosis herpesvirus and rhesus rhadinovirus (Cercopithecine herpesvirus 17). Molecular analysis of these viruses has elucidated several functionally conserved genes and properties shared with KSHV involved in cellular proliferation, transformation, and immune evasion that facilitate the oncogenic potential of these viruses. This review examines the comparative pathobiology of KSHV, discusses the role of macaque rhadinoviruses as models of human disease, and outlines the derivation of specific pathogen-free animals.Abbreviations: CCL, cellular chemokine ligand; IRF, interferon regulatory factors; KSHV, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; LANA, latent nuclear antigen; MCD, multicentric Castleman disease; MCP1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1; miRNA, microRNA; ORF, open reading frame; PEL, primary effusion lymphoma; RFHV, retroperitoneal fibromatosis herpesvirus; RVV, rhesus rhadinovirus; SaHV2, Saimiriine herpesvirus 2; SPF, specific pathogen-free; SRV2, simian retrovirus type 2; THBS1, thrombospondinMembers of the herpesviridae are enveloped DNA viral agents that can infect a variety of host species, resulting in lifelong infection. The family is divided into Alphaherpesvirinae, Betaherpesvirinae, and Gammaherpesvirinae, according to biologic behavior and phylogenetic relationship. As a group, synthesis of viral DNA occurs in the nucleus, and production of infectious virions is associated with destruction of the cell. Herpesviruses have large complex genomes and often have acquired host genes that allow these viruses to modulate and persist in the face of host immune responses.^25,71 This condition (termed ‘latency’) is characteristic of all herpesviral infections of the natural host. Although most members of the herpesviridae are of relatively low virulence in their respective hosts, some lack strict host specificity, and cross-species transmission to an inadvertent host can be associated with severe and fatal disease.The gammaherpesvirinae subfamily is characterized by in vitro and in vivo infection of lymphoblastoid cells and is further divided into the lymphocryptovirus (γ1 herpesviruses) and rhadinovirus (γ2 herpesviruses) genera. Rhadinoviruses have taken on increased importance with the identification of the novel Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV, Human herpesvirus 8) in association with Kaposi sarcoma, an inflammatory and neoplastic condition seen in many HIV-infected patients with AIDS.^20,22 Until the recognition of KSHV more than a decade ago, rhadinovirus infection of primates was thought to be restricted to the New World primate lineages, but subsequent investigation revealed a number of novel species-specific viruses in a variety of Old World primates (28 As discussed later, based largely on phylogenetic analysis, it is now believed that the rhadinoviruses are subdivided into 2 distinct groupings (rhadinovirus [RV] 1 and 2).⁷⁷ This review will examine 2 recently recognized rhadinoviruses of macaques (retroperitoneal fibromatosis virus [RFHV] and rhesus rhadinovirus [RRV, Cercopethecine herpesvirus 17]), focusing on their comparative pathobiology with KSHV, their impact on naturally occurring disease entities, and their roles as animal models of human disease.

Table 1.

Nomenclature of primate rhadinoviruses (RV)