ABRF-PRG03: Phosphorylation Site Determination

A fundamental aspect of proteomics is the analysis of post-translational modifications, of which phosphorylation is an important class. Numerous nonradioactivity-based methods have been described for high-sensitivity phosphorylation site mapping. The ABRF Proteomics Research Group has conducted a study to help determine how many laboratories are equipped to take on such projects, which methods they choose to apply, and how successful the laboratories are in implementing particular methodologies. The ABRF-PRG03 sample was distributed as a tryptic digest of a mixture of two proteins with two synthetic phosphopeptides added. Each sample contained 5 pmol of unphosphorylated protein digest, 1 pmol of each phosphopeptide from the same protein, and 200 fmol of a minor protein component. Study participants were challenged to identify the two proteins and the two phosphorylated peptides, and determine the site of phosphorylation in each peptide. Almost all respondents successfully identified the major protein component, whereas only 10% identified the minor protein component. Phosphorylation site analysis proved surprisingly difficult, with only 3 of the 54 laboratories correctly determining both sites of phosphorylation. Various strategies and instruments were applied to this task with mixed success; chromatographic separation of the peptides was clearly helpful, whereas enrichment by metal affinity chromatography met with surprisingly little success. We conclude that locating sites of phosphorylation remains a significant challenge at this level of sample abundance.     

翻译后修饰蛋白质组学研究的技术策略

 蛋白质组学早期研究的绝大部分工作是在关注细胞不同生长时期或是疾病、分裂素刺激下的蛋白质表达水平变化.然而,许多至关重要的生命进程不仅由蛋白质的相对丰度控制,更重要的是被那些时空特异分布的可逆翻译后修饰控制的,揭示翻译后修饰发生规律是理解蛋白质复杂多样的生物功能的一个重要前提.由于翻译后修饰蛋白质在样本中含量低且动态范围广,其相关研究极具挑战性,亲和富集、多维分离等技术与生物质谱的结合为翻译后修饰蛋白质组学的发展提供了契机,目前,已进行规模化研究的蛋白质翻译后修饰主要有四大类,其中磷酸化和糖基化研究较多.本文针对大规模翻译后的修饰蛋白质的分析策略和技术路线,如蛋白质的磷酸化修饰, 糖基化修饰, 泛素化修饰,基于蛋白质氧化还原状态进行的氧化还原修饰和其它修饰像乙酰化、甲基化、脂基化修饰等进行了综述.     

ABRF-PRG05: De Novo Peptide Sequence Determination

A common request of proteomics core facilities is protein identification. However, in some instances primary sequence information for the protein in question is not present in public databases. In other cases, the amino acid sequence of a protein may differ in some way from the sequence predicted from the gene sequence in a database as a result of gene mutation, gene splicing, and/or multiple posttranslational modifications. Thus, it may be necessary to determine the sequence of one or more peptides de novo in order to identify and/or adequately characterize the protein of interest. The primary goal of this study was to give participating laboratories an opportunity to evaluate their proficiency in sequencing unknown peptides that are not included in any published database. Samples containing 3–6 pmol each of five synthetic peptides with amino acid sequences that were not present in public databases were sent to 106 laboratories. One nonstandard amino acid was present in one of the peptides. From a comparison of the results obtained by different strategies, participating laboratories will be able to gauge their own capabilities and establish realistic expectations for the approaches that can be used for this determination.     

Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics

To improve the efficiency, accuracy, reproducibility, throughput and proteome coverage of mass spectrometry-based quantitative approaches, both in vitro and in vivo tagging of particular amino acid residues of cellular proteins have been introduced to assist mass spectrometry for global-scale comparative studies of differentially expressed proteins/modifications between different biologically relevant cell states or cells at different pathological states. The basic features of these methods introduce pair-wise isotope signals of each individual peptide containing a particular type of tagged amino acid (amino acid-coded mass tagging) that originated from different cell states. In this review, the applications of major amino acid-coded mass tagging-based quantitative proteomics approaches, including isotope-coded affinity tag, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ?) and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture are summarized in the context of their respective strengths/weakness in identifying those differentially expressed or post-translational modified proteins regulated by particular cellular stress on a genomic scale in a high-throughput manner. Importantly, these gel-free, in-spectra quantitative mechanisms have been further explored to identify/characterize large-scale protein–protein interactions involving various functional pathways. Taken together, the information about quantitative proteome changes, including multiple regulated proteins and their interconnected relationships, will provide an important insight into the molecular mechanisms, where novel targets for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention will be identified.     

Current trends in computational inference from mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Mass spectrometry offers a high-throughput approach to quantifying the proteome associated with a biological sample and hence has become the primary approach of proteomic analyses. Computation is tightly coupled to this advanced technological platform as a required component of not only peptide and protein identification, but quantification and functional inference, such as protein modifications and interactions. Proteomics faces several key computational challenges such as identification of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectra as well as their quantitation. In addition, the application of proteomics to systems biology requires understanding the functional proteome, including how the dynamics of the cell change in response to protein modifications and complex interactions between biomolecules. This review presents an overview of recently developed methods and their impact on these core computational challenges currently facing proteomics.     

Mass spectrometry technologies for proteomics.

In the late 1980s, the advent of soft ionization techniques capable of generating stable gas phase ions from thermally unstable biomolecules, namely matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and electrospray ionization (ESI), laid the way for the development of a set of powerful alternatives to the traditional Edman chemistry for the structural characterization of peptides and proteins. The rapid protein identification capabilities that, coupled with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, provided insights into all sorts of biological systems since the dawn of proteomics and have been exploited in the last few years for the development of more powerful and automatable gel-free strategies, mainly based on multidimensional chromatographic separations of peptides from proteolytic digests. In parallel to the evolution of ion sources, mass analysers and scan modes, the invention of new elegant biochemical strategies to fractionate or simplify highly complex mixtures, or to introduce isotopic labels in peptides in a variety of ways now makes also possible large-scale, high-coverage quantitative studies in a wide dynamic range. In this review, we provide the fundamental concepts of mass spectrometry (MS) and describe the technological progress of MS-based proteomics since its earliest days. Representative literature examples of their true power, either when employed as exploratory or as targeted techniques, is provided as well.     

The methods of quantitative proteomics

In modern science proteomic analysis is inseparable from other fields of systemic biology. Possessing huge resources quantitative proteomics operates colossal information on molecular mechanisms of life. Advances in proteomics help researchers to solve complex problems of cell signaling, posttranslational modification, structure and funciotnal homology of proteins, molecular diagnostics etc. More than 40 various methods have been developed in proteomics for quantitative analysis of proteins. Although each method is unique and has certain advantages and disadvantages all these use various isotope labels (tags). In this review we will consider the most popular and effective methods employing both chemical modifications of proteins and also metabolic and enzymatic methods of isotope labeling.     

Proteomics and a future generation of plant molecular biologists

Proteomic methods are required for the study of many different aspects of plant function. Important issues in proteomics include the molecular complexity of proteins, given that there are hundreds of thousands of chemically and physically distinct proteins in plants, and the context of protein functions with respect to both genomes and the environment. Available genomic and gene sequences greatly simplify the identification of proteins using improved techniques of mass spectrometry. This improved capability has led to much discussion on proteomes, and some experimentation using proteomic methodologies aimed at modest numbers of proteins. The scale of proteomics is open, for the number of proteins and genes considered at any one time is as dependent on the nature of the scientific question posed as on technical resources and capabilities. We know just enough about plant proteomes to imagine the breathtaking scope of our ignorance. There are tremendous opportunities for new molecular biologists to define the nature of the protein machines that transduce genetic and environmental information, and transform simple energy and matter, to give plants.     

Mass spectrometry-based strategies for characterization of histones and their post-translational modifications

Due to the intimate interactions between histones and DNA, the characterization of histones has become the focus of great attention. A series of mass spectrometry-based technologies have been dedicated to the characterization and quantitation of different histone forms. This review focuses on the discussion of mass spectrometry-based strategies used for the characterization of histones and their post-translational modifications.     

Plant Cell Wall Proteomics： Mass Spectrometry Data,a Trove for Research on Protein Structure/Function Relationships

Proteomics allows the large-scale study of protein expression either in whole organisms or in purified organelles. In particular, mass spectrometry （MS） analysis of gel-separated proteins produces data not only for protein identification, but for protein structure, location, and processing as well. An in-depth analysis was performed on MS data from etiolated hypocotyl cell wall proteomics ofArabidopsis thaliana. These analyses show that highly homologous members of multigene families can be differentiated. Two lectins presenting 93% amino acid identity were identified using peptide mass fingerprinting. Although the identification of structural proteins such as extensins or hydroxyproline/proline-rich proteins （H/PRPs） is arduous, different types of MS spectra were exploited to identify and characterize an H/PRP. Maturation events in a couple of cell wall proteins （CWPs） were analyzed using site mapping. N-glycosylation of CWPs as well as the hydroxylation or oxidation of amino acids were also explored, adding information to improve our understanding of CWP structure/function relationships. A bioinformatic tool was developed to locate by means of MS the N-terminus of mature secreted proteins and N-glycosylation.     

Absolute quantification strategies in proteomics based on mass spectrometry

The strong need for quantitative information in proteomics has fueled the development of mass spectrometry-based analytical methods that are able to determine protein abundances. This article reviews mass spectrometry experiments aimed at providing an absolute quantification of proteins. The experiments make use of the isotope-dilution concept by spiking a known amount of synthetic, isotope-labeled reference peptide into the analyte sample. Quantification is achieved by comparing the mass spectrometry signal intensities of the reference with an endogenous peptide that is generated upon proteolytic cleavage of the target protein. In an analogous manner, the level of post-translational modification at a distinct residue within a target protein can be determined. Among the strengths of absolute quantification are low detection limits reaching subfemtomole levels, a high dynamic range spanning approximately five orders of magnitude, low requirements for sample clean-up, and a fast and straightforward method development. Recent studies have demonstrated the compatibility of absolute quantification with various mass spectrometry readout techniques and sample purification steps such as 1D gel electrophoresis, size-exclusion chromatography, isoelectric peptide focusing, strong cation exchange and reversed phase or affinity chromatography. Under ideal conditions, quantification errors and coefficients of variation below 5% have been reported. However, the fact that at the start of the experiment the analyte is a protein and the internal standard is a peptide, severe quantification errors may result due to the selection of unsuitable reference peptides and/or imperfect protein proteolysis. Within the ensemble of mass spectrometry-based quantification methods, absolute quantification is the method of choice in cases where absolute numbers, many repetitive experiments or precise levels of post-translational modifications are required for a few, preselected species of interest. Consequently, prominent application areas include biomarker quantification, the study of post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation or ubiquitination and the comparison of concentrations of interacting proteins.     

Mapping of Post-translational Modifications of Transition Proteins,TP1 and TP2, and Identification of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 4 and Lysine Methyltransferase 7 as Methyltransferase for TP2

In a unique global chromatin remodeling process during mammalian spermiogenesis, 90% of the nucleosomal histones are replaced by testis-specific transition proteins, TP1, TP2, and TP4. These proteins are further substituted by sperm-specific protamines, P1 and P2, to form a highly condensed sperm chromatin. In spermatozoa, a small proportion of chromatin, which ranges from 1 to 10% in mammals, retains the nucleosomal architecture and is implicated to play a role in transgenerational inheritance. However, there is still no mechanistic understanding of the interaction of chromatin machinery with histones and transition proteins, which facilitate this selective histone replacement from chromatin. Here, we report the identification of 16 and 19 novel post-translational modifications on rat endogenous transition proteins, TP1 and TP2, respectively, by mass spectrometry. By in vitro assays and mutational analysis, we demonstrate that protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT4 (CARM1) methylates TP2 at Arg⁷¹, Arg⁷⁵, and Arg⁹² residues, and lysine methyltransferase KMT7 (Set9) methylates TP2 at Lys⁸⁸ and Lys⁹¹ residues. Further studies with modification-specific antibodies that recognize TP2K88me1 and TP2R92me1 modifications showed that they appear in elongating to condensing spermatids and predominantly associated with the chromatin-bound TP2. This work establishes the repertoire of post-translational modifications that occur on TP1 and TP2, which may play a significant role in various chromatin-templated events during spermiogenesis and in the establishment of the sperm epigenome.