Chromatin in multicolor

Chromatin consists of DNA and a large number of associated proteins. Filion et al. (2010) provide a genome-wide analysis of the location of 53 chromatin proteins in Drosophila, revealing important principles underlying chromatin regulation and providing colorful insights into their organization.     

Principles of nucleosome recognition by chromatin factors and enzymes

The recent torrent of structures of chromatin complexes determined by cryoelectron microscopy provides an opportunity to discern general principles for how chromatin factors and enzymes interact with their nucleosome substrate. We find that many chromatin proteins use a strikingly similar arginine anchor and variant arginine interactions to bind to the nucleosome acidic patch. We also observe that many chromatin proteins target the H3 and H2B histone fold α1-loop1 elbows and the H2B C-terminal helix on the nucleosomal histone face. These interactions with the histones can be complemented with interactions with and distortions of nucleosomal DNA.     

Interaction of SET domains with histones and nucleic acid structures in active chromatin

Changes in the normal program of gene expression are the basis for a number of human diseases. Epigenetic control of gene expression is programmed by chromatin modifications-the inheritable "histone code"-the major component of which is histone methylation. This chromatin methylation code of gene activity is created upon cell differentiation and is further controlled by the "SET" (methyltransferase) domain proteins which maintain this histone methylation pattern and preserve it through rounds of cell division. The molecular principles of epigenetic gene maintenance are essential for proper treatment and prevention of disorders and their complications. However, the principles of epigenetic gene programming are not resolved. Here we discuss some evidence of how the SET proteins determine the required states of target genes and maintain the required levels of their activity. We suggest that, along with other recognition pathways, SET domains can directly recognize the nucleosome and nucleic acids intermediates that are specific for active chromatin regions.     

Ordered nucleation and spreading of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, silencing at the HM loci depends on Sir proteins, which are structural components of silenced chromatin. To explore the structure and assembly of silenced chromatin, the associations of Sir proteins with sequences across the HMR locus were examined by chromatin immunoprecipitation. In wild-type cells, Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p were spread throughout and coincident with the silenced region at HMR. Sir1p, in contrast, associated only with the HMR-E silencer, consistent with its role in establishment but not maintenance of silencing. Sir4p was required for the association of other Sir proteins with silencers. In contrast, in the absence of Sir2p or Sir3p, partial assemblies of Sir proteins could form at silencers, where Sir protein assembly began. Spreading across HMR required Sir2p and Sir3p, as well as the deacetylase activity of Sir2p. These data support a model for the spreading of silenced chromatin involving cycles of nucleosome deacetylation by Sir2p followed by recruitment of additional Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p to the newly deacetylated nucleosome. This model suggests mechanisms for boundary formation, and for maintenance and inheritance of silenced chromatin. The principles are generalizable to other types of heritable chromatin states.     

The role of chromatin proteins in DNA damage recognition and repair Mini-review

The structure of chromatin is the major factor determining the rate and efficiency of DNA repair. Chromatin remodeling events such as rearrangement of nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures are indispensable features of repair processes. During the last decade numerous chromatin proteins have been identified that preferentially bind to different types of DNA damage. The HMGB proteins, which preferentially interact with DNA intrastrand crosslinks induced by cisplatin, are the archetypal example of such proteins. Several hypothetical models have been proposed describing the role of such damage-binding chromatin proteins. The damage shielding model postulates that binding of chromatin proteins to damaged DNA might disturb damage recognition by repair factors and impair its removal. Alternatively, the damage-recognition/signaling model proposes that the binding of specific chromatin proteins to damaged DNA could serve as a hallmark to be recognized by repair proteins. Additionally, the binding of specific chromatin proteins to damaged DNA could induce chromatin remodeling at the damage site and indirectly affect its repair. This paper aims to critically review current experimental data in relation to such possible roles of chromatin proteins.     

Chromatin domains in higher eukaryotes: insights from genome-wide mapping studies

In genomes of higher eukaryotes, adjacent genes often show coordinated regulation of their expression. Compartmentalization of multiple neighboring genes into a shared chromatin environment can facilitate this coordinated expression. New mapping techniques have begun to reveal that such multigene chromatin domains are a common feature of fly and mammalian genomes. Many different types of chromatin domains have been identified based on the genomic binding patterns of various proteins and histone modifications. In addition, maps of genome–nuclear lamina associations and of looping interactions between loci provide the first systematic views of the three-dimensional folding of interphase chromosomes. These genome-wide datasets uncover new architectural principles of eukaryotic genomes and indicate that multigene chromatin domains are prevalent and important regulatory units.     

Histone transfer among chaperones

The eukaryotic processes of nucleosome assembly and disassembly govern chromatin dynamics, in which histones exchange in a highly regulated manner to promote genome accessibility for all DNA-dependent processes. This regulation is partly carried out by histone chaperones, which serve multifaceted roles in co-ordinating the interactions of histone proteins with modification enzymes, nucleosome remodellers, other histone chaperones and nucleosomal DNA. The molecular details of the processes by which histone chaperones promote delivery of histones among their many functional partners are still largely undefined, but promise to offer insights into epigenome maintenance. In the present paper, we review recent findings on the histone chaperone interactions that guide the assembly of histones H3 and H4 into chromatin. This evidence supports the concepts of histone post-translational modifications and specific histone chaperone interactions as guiding principles for histone H3/H4 transactions during chromatin assembly.     

A unique vertebrate histone H1-related protamine-like protein results in an unusual sperm chromatin organization

Protamine-like proteins constitute a group of sperm nuclear basic proteins that have been shown to be related to somatic linker histones (histone H1 family). Like protamines, they usually replace the chromatin somatic histone complement during spermiogenesis; hence their name. Several of these proteins have been characterized to date in invertebrate organisms, but information about their occurrence and characterization in vertebrates is still lacking. In this sense, the genus Mullus is unique, as it is the only known vertebrate that has its sperm chromatin organized by virtually only protamine-like proteins. We show that the sperm chromatin of this organism is organized by two type I protamine-like proteins (PL-I), and we characterize the major protamine-like component of the fish Mullus surmuletus (striped red mullet). The native chromatin structure resulting from the association of these proteins with DNA was studied by micrococcal nuclease digestion as well as electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. It is shown that the PL-I proteins organize chromatin in parallel DNA bundles of different thickness in a quite distinct arrangement that is reminiscent of the chromatin organization of those organisms that contain protamines (but not histones) in their sperm.     

The binding of SSB-proteins with DNA in chromatin of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells]

Using UV-induced cross-linking between proteins and DNA, the contacts between single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSB proteins) and chromatin DNA have been demonstrated. Ehrlich ascites tumour DNA was labeled in vivo by inoculation of tumour-bearing mice with 3H-thymidine. The cells were irradiated with the UV light dose of 3000 J/m2, destroyed in a Triton X-100-containing hypotonic medium, and separated by centrifugation into the extrachromatin fraction and chromatin. Chromatin DNA was digested with DNAase 1, and the chromatin proteins were extracted with 2 M NaCl-polyethyleneglycol. SSB proteins from the extrachromatin fraction and chromatin were purified. Only SSB proteins from UV-irradiated cell chromatin appeared to possess a high specific radioactivity which exceeded 7.5-fold that of non-irradiated cells. There were no differences between chromatin SSB proteins in control and irradiated cells as could be evidenced from SDS electrophoresis data. It is assumed that in irradiated cells SSB proteins of DNA-digested chromatin are covalently cross-linked with DNA fragments.     

Genome-wide histone modifications: gaining specificity by preventing promiscuity

More than 20 residues within the four core histone proteins of the nucleosome are potential sites of post-translational modifications, such as methylation, acetylation, ubiquitination and phosphorylation. It has been hypothesized that specific patterns of these modifications on the nucleosome facilitate recruitment of non-histone proteins to chromatin. When such modifications are restricted to particular regions of the genome, they seem to play an important role in creating specific chromatin domains. However, more recent results suggest that some histone modifications, particularly those that exist on a genome-wide scale, act to reduce nonspecific binding by chromatin proteins involved in silencing. This decrease of promiscuous binding ensures that the silent chromatin proteins are not titrated away from their normal locations on chromosomes. We suggest that preventing such promiscuous binding of chromatin proteins is an important part of generating specificity to create chromatin domains and overall chromosome organization.     

Signaling network model of chromatin

We suggest that common principles underlie both cellular signaling networks and chromatin. To exemplify similarities, we focus on signaling complexes that form at membrane receptors and on nucleosomes. Multiple signal-transducing modifications on side chain residues of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and histone proteins are used to create docking sites that facilitate proximal relations of enzymes and their substrates. We argue that multiple histone modifications, like RTK modifications, promote switch-like behavior and ensure robustness of the signal, and we compare this interpretation with the histone code hypothesis. This view provides insight into chromatin function and epigenetic inheritance.     

Porcine follitropin. The amino-acid sequence of the beta subunit

By treatment with tRNA in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2, a chromatin preparation was obtained containing all five major histone fractions but lacking a considerable portion of non-histone proteins. This chromatin preparation as well as chromatin extracted with 0.6 M NaCl (depleted of H1 histone and some non-histone proteins) were characterized in respect of solubility and chromatin DNA accessibility. Both samples possessed practically the same solubility in the presence of 0.15 M NaCl and 1 mM MgCl2. The solubility of tRNA-treated chromatin in 5 and 10 mM MgCl2 was higher than that of salt-extracted chromation. The accessibility of the DNA of these chromatin preparations was tested with DNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli as a probe, using procedure that permits measurement of binding site frequency. Both tRNA-treated and salt-extracted chromatin contained as many as 33% and untreated chromatin as few as 4% of the number of binding sites found on protein-free DNA. These results demonstrate that at least in part the non-histone proteins are responsible for salt-induced insolubility and low DNA accessibility of chromatin, thus revealing the importance of non-histone proteins in the maintenance of an overall chromatin structure.     

Chinese hamster ORC subunits dynamically associate with chromatin throughout the cell-cycle

In yeast, the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) is bound to replication origins throughout the cell-cycle, but in animal cells, there are conflicting data as to whether and when ORC is removed from chromatin. We find ORC1, 2 and ORC4 to be metabolically stable proteins that co-fractionate with chromatin throughout the cell-cycle in Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Since cellular extraction methods cannot directly examine the chromatin binding properties of proteins in vivo, we examined ORC:chromatin interactions in living cells. Fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) studies revealed ORC1 and ORC4 to be highly dynamic proteins during the cell-cycle with exchange kinetics similar to other regulatory chromatin proteins. In vivo interaction with chromatin was not significantly altered throughout the cell-cycle, including S-phase. These data support a model in which ORC subunits dynamically interact with chromatin throughout the cell-cycle.     

Yeast high mobility group protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin and is evicted during repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA is packaged into condensed chromatin fibers by association with histones and architectural proteins such as high mobility group (HMGB) proteins. However, this DNA packaging reduces accessibility of enzymes that act on DNA, such as proteins that process DNA after double strand breaks (DSBs). Chromatin remodeling overcomes this barrier. We show here that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin as evidenced by faster chromatin remodeling in its absence. HMO1 was evicted along with core histones during repair of DSBs, and chromatin remodeling events such as histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 eviction were faster in absence of HMO1. The facilitated chromatin remodeling in turn correlated with more efficient DNA resection and recruitment of repair proteins; for example, inward translocation of the DNA-end-binding protein Ku was faster in absence of HMO1. This chromatin stabilization requires the lysine-rich C-terminal extension of HMO1 as truncation of the HMO1 C-terminal tail phenocopies hmo1 deletion. Since this is reminiscent of the need for the basic C-terminal domain of mammalian histone H1 in chromatin compaction, we speculate that HMO1 promotes chromatin stability by DNA bending and compaction imposed by its lysine-rich domain and that it must be evicted along with core histones for efficient DSB repair.