Dual stator dynamics in the Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1 flagellar motor

The bacterial flagellar motor is an intricate nanomachine which converts ion gradients into rotational movement. Torque is created by ion‐dependent stator complexes which surround the rotor in a ring. Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1 expresses two distinct types of stator units: the Na⁺‐dependent PomA₄B₂ and the H⁺‐dependent MotA₄B₂. Here, we have explored the stator unit dynamics in the MR‐1 flagellar system by using mCherry‐labeled PomAB and MotAB units. We observed a total of between 7 and 11 stator units in each flagellar motor. Both types of stator units exchanged between motors and a pool of stator complexes in the membrane, and the exchange rate of MotAB, but not of PomAB, units was dependent on the environmental Na⁺‐levels. In 200 mM Na⁺, the numbers of PomAB and MotAB units in wild‐type motors was determined to be about 7:2 (PomAB:MotAB), shifting to about 6:5 without Na⁺. Significantly, the average swimming speed of MR‐1 cells at low Na⁺ conditions was increased in the presence of MotAB. These data strongly indicate that the S. oneidensis flagellar motors simultaneously use H⁺ and Na⁺ driven stators in a configuration governed by MotAB incorporation efficiency in response to environmental Na⁺ levels.     

MotX and MotY Are Required for Flagellar Rotation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

The single polar flagellum of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is powered by two different stator complexes, the sodium-dependent PomAB and the proton-driven MotAB. In addition, Shewanella harbors two genes with homology to motX and motY of Vibrio species. In Vibrio, the products of these genes are crucial for sodium-dependent flagellar rotation. Resequencing of S. oneidensis MR-1 motY revealed that the gene does not harbor an authentic frameshift as was originally reported. Mutational analysis demonstrated that both MotX and MotY are critical for flagellar rotation of S. oneidensis MR-1 for both sodium- and proton-dependent stator systems but do not affect assembly of the flagellar filament. Fluorescence tagging of MotX and MotY to mCherry revealed that both proteins localize to the flagellated cell pole depending on the presence of the basal flagellar structure. Functional localization of MotX requires MotY, whereas MotY localizes independently of MotX. In contrast to the case in Vibrio, neither protein is crucial for the recruitment of the PomAB or MotAB stator complexes to the flagellated cell pole, nor do they play a major role in the stator selection process. Thus, MotX and MotY are not exclusive features of sodium-dependent flagellar systems. Furthermore, MotX and MotY in Shewanella, and possibly also in other genera, must have functions beyond the recruitment of the stator complexes.Flagellum-mediated swimming motility is a widespread means of locomotion among bacteria. Flagella consist of protein filaments that are rotated at the filament''s base by a membrane-embedded motor (3, 39). Rotation is powered by electrochemical gradients across the cytoplasmic membrane. Thus far, two coupling ions, sodium ions and protons, have been described as energy sources for bacterial flagellar motors (4, 24, 48). Two major components confer the conversion of the ion flux into rotary motion. The first component forms a rotor-mounted ring-like structure at the base of the flagellar basal body and is referred to as the switch complex or the C ring; it is composed of the proteins FliG, FliM, and FliN. The second major component is the stator system, consisting of membrane-embedded stator complexes that surround the C ring (3). Each stator complex is composed of two subunits in a 4:2 stoichiometry. In Escherichia coli, MotA and MotB constitute the stator complex by forming a proton-specific ion channel; the Na⁺-dependent counterpart in Vibrio species consists of the orthologs PomA and PomB (1, 5, 49). MotA and PomA both have four transmembrane domains and are thought to interact with FliG via a cytoplasmic segment to generate torque (2, 50). Stator function is presumably made possible by a peptidoglycan-binding motif located at the C-terminal portion of MotB and PomB that anchors the stator complex to the cell wall (1, 8). In E. coli, at least 11 stator complexes can be synchronously involved in driving flagellar rotation (35). However, a single complex is sufficient for rotation of the filament (36, 40). Despite its tight attachment to the peptidoglycan, the stator ring system was found to form a surprisingly dynamic complex. It has been suggested that inactive precomplexes of the stators form a membrane-located pool before being activated upon incorporation into the stator ring system around the motor (13, 45). In E. coli, the turnover time of stator complexes can be as short as 30 s (21).In Vibrio species, two auxiliary proteins, designated MotX and MotY, are required for motor function of the Na⁺-driven polar flagellar system (22, 23, 28, 31). Recently, it was shown that the proteins associate with the flagellar basal body in Vibrio alginolyticus to form an additional structure, the T ring (42). MotX interacts with MotY and the PomAB stator complexes, and both proteins are thought to be crucial for the acquisition of the stators to the motor of the polar flagellum. (29, 30, 42). A MotY homolog is also associated with the proton-dependent motor system of the lateral flagella of V. alginolyticus that is induced under conditions of elevated viscosity (41).We recently showed that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 uses two different stator systems to drive the rotation of its single polar flagellum, the Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator and the proton-driven MotAB stator. As suggested by genetic data, the MotAB stator has been acquired by lateral gene transfer, presumably in the process of adaptation from a marine to a freshwater environment (32). The two different stators are recruited to the motor in a way that depends on the sodium ion concentration in the medium. The Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator is present at the flagellated cell pole regardless of the sodium ion concentration, whereas the proton-dependent MotAB stator functionally localizes only under conditions of low sodium or in the absence of PomAB. It is still unclear how stator selection is achieved and whether additional proteins play a role in this process.Orthologs of motX and motY have been annotated in S. oneidensis MR-1. We thus hypothesized that MotX and MotY might play a role in stator selection in S. oneidensis MR-1. However, the originally published sequence of motY harbors a frameshift that would result in a drastically truncated protein lacking a functionally relevant putative peptidoglycan-binding domain at its C terminus (16, 18). This situation seemed inconsistent with a role for MotY in S. oneidensis MR-1.Here we describe a functional analysis of the MotX and MotY orthologs in S. oneidensis MR-1. We found that motY does not, in fact, contain a frameshift mutation, so that MotY is translated in its full-length form. Both MotX and MotY were essential for Na⁺-dependent and proton-dependent motility. Therefore, these proteins have a role in S. oneidensis MR-1 that differs from their function in Vibrio species. We also used fusions to the fluorescent protein mCherry for functional localization studies of MotX and MotY.     

Structure of the flagellar motor protein complex PomAB: implications for the torque-generating conformation

The bacterial flagellar motor is driven by an ion flux through a channel called MotAB in Escherichia coli or Salmonella and PomAB in Vibrio alginolyticus. PomAB is composed of two transmembrane (TM) components, PomA and PomB, and converts a sodium ion flux to rotation of the flagellum. Its homolog, MotAB, utilizes protons instead of sodium ions. PomB/MotB has a peptidoglycan (PG)-binding motif in the periplasmic domain, allowing it to function as the stator by being anchored to the PG layer. To generate torque, PomAB/MotAB is thought to undergo a conformational change triggered by the ion flux and to interact directly with FliG, a component of the rotor. Here, we present the first three-dimensional structure of this torque-generating stator unit analyzed by electron microscopy. The structure of PomAB revealed two arm domains, which contain the PG-binding site, connected to a large base made of the TM and cytoplasmic domains. The arms lean downward to the membrane surface, likely representing a "plugged" conformation, which would prevent ions leaking through the channel. We propose a model for how PomAB units are placed around the flagellar basal body to function as torque generators.     

Cytokinesis monitoring during development; rapid pole-to-pole shuttling of a signaling protein by localized kinase and phosphatase in Caulobacter

For successful generation of different cell types by asymmetric cell division, cell differentiation should be initiated only after completion of division. Here, we describe a control mechanism by which Caulobacter couples the initiation of a developmental program to the completion of cytokinesis. Genetic evidence indicates that localization of the signaling protein DivK at the flagellated pole prevents premature initiation of development. Photobleaching and FRET experiments show that polar localization of DivK is dynamic with rapid pole-to-pole shuttling of diffusible DivK generated by the localized activities of PleC phosphatase and DivJ kinase at opposite poles. This shuttling is interrupted upon completion of cytokinesis by the segregation of PleC and DivJ to different daughter cells, resulting in disruption of DivK localization at the flagellated pole and subsequent initiation of development in the flagellated progeny. Thus, dynamic polar localization of a diffusible protein provides a control mechanism that monitors cytokinesis to regulate development.     

Specificity of motor components in the dual flagellar system of Shewanella putrefaciens CN-32

Bacterial flagellar motors are intricate nanomachines in which the stator units and rotor component FliM may be dynamically exchanged during function. Similar to other bacterial species, the gammaproteobacterium Shewanella putrefaciens CN-32 possesses a complete secondary flagellar system along with a corresponding stator unit. Expression of the secondary system occurs during planktonic growth in complex media and leads to the formation of a subpopulation with one or more additional flagella at random positions in addition to the primary polar system. We used physiological and phenotypic characterizations of defined mutants in concert with fluorescent microscopy on labelled components of the two different systems, the stator proteins PomB and MotB, the rotor components FliM(1) and FliM(2), and the auxiliary motor components MotX and MotY, to determine localization, function and dynamics of the proteins in the flagellar motors. The results demonstrate that the polar flagellum is driven by a Na(+)-dependent FliM(1)/PomAB/MotX/MotY flagellar motor while the secondary system is rotated by a H(+)-dependent FliM(2)/MotAB motor. The components were highly specific for their corresponding motor and are unlikely to be extensively swapped or shared between the two flagellar systems under planktonic conditions. The results have implications for both specificity and dynamics of flagellar motor components.     

Mutations targeting the C-terminal domain of FliG can disrupt motor assembly in the Na(+)-driven flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus

The torque of the bacterial flagellar motor is generated by the rotor-stator interaction coupled with specific ion translocation through the stator channel. To produce a fully functional motor, multiple stator units must be properly incorporated around the rotor by an as yet unknown mechanism to engage the rotor-stator interactions. Here, we investigated stator assembly using a mutational approach of the Na⁺-driven polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus, whose stator is localized at the flagellated cell pole. We mutated a rotor protein, FliG, which is located at the C ring of the basal body and closely participates in torque generation, and found that point mutation L259Q, L270R or L271P completely abolishes both motility and polar localization of the stator without affecting flagellation. Likewise, mutations V274E and L279P severely affected motility and stator assembly. Those residues are localized at the core of the globular C-terminal domain of FliG when mapped onto the crystal structure of FliG from Thermotoga maritima, which suggests that those mutations induce quite large structural alterations at the interface responsible for the rotor-stator interaction. These results show that the C-terminal domain of FliG is critical for the proper assembly of PomA/PomB stator complexes around the rotor and probably functions as the target of the stator at the rotor side.     

The Caulobacter crescentus polar organelle development protein PodJ is differentially localized and is required for polar targeting of the PleC development regulator

Regulation of polar development and cell division in Caulobacter crescentus relies on the dynamic localization of several proteins to cell poles at specific stages of the cell cycle. The polar organelle development protein, PodJ, is required for the synthesis of the adhesive holdfast and pili. Here we show the cell cycle localization of PodJ and describe a novel role for this protein in controlling the dynamic localization of the developmental regulator PleC. In swarmer cells, a short form of PodJ is localized at the flagellated pole. Upon differentiation of the swarmer cell into a stalked cell, full length PodJ is synthesized and localizes to the pole opposite the stalk. In late predivisional cells, full length PodJ is processed into a short form which remains localized at the flagellar pole after cell division and is degraded during swarmer to stalked cell differentiation. Polar localization of the developmental regulator PleC requires the presence of PodJ. In contrast, the polar localization of PodJ is not dependent on the presence of PleC. These results indicate that PodJ is an important determinant for the localization of a major regulator of cell differentiation. Thus, PodJ acts directly or indirectly to target PleC to the incipient swarmer pole, to establish the cellular asymmetry that leads to the synthesis of holdfasts and pili at their proper subcellular location.     

Cyclic Di-GMP-Mediated Repression of Swarming Motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 Requires the MotAB Stator

The second messenger cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) plays a critical role in the regulation of motility. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14, c-di-GMP inversely controls biofilm formation and surface swarming motility, with high levels of this dinucleotide signal stimulating biofilm formation and repressing swarming. P. aeruginosa encodes two stator complexes, MotAB and MotCD, that participate in the function of its single polar flagellum. Here we show that the repression of swarming motility requires a functional MotAB stator complex. Mutating the motAB genes restores swarming motility to a strain with artificially elevated levels of c-di-GMP as well as stimulates swarming in the wild-type strain, while overexpression of MotA from a plasmid represses swarming motility. Using point mutations in MotA and the FliG rotor protein of the motor supports the conclusion that MotA-FliG interactions are critical for c-di-GMP-mediated swarming inhibition. Finally, we show that high c-di-GMP levels affect the localization of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-MotD fusion, indicating a mechanism whereby this second messenger has an impact on MotCD function. We propose that when c-di-GMP level is high, the MotAB stator can displace MotCD from the motor, thereby affecting motor function. Our data suggest a newly identified means of c-di-GMP-mediated control of surface motility, perhaps conserved among Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, and other organisms that encode two stator systems.     

Hypoxia‐induced localization of chemotaxis‐related signaling proteins in Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae has three sets of chemotaxis‐related signaling proteins, of which only System II has been shown to be involved in chemotaxis. Here, we examined localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐fused components of System I. The histidine kinase (CheA1) and the adaptor (CheW0) of System I localized to polar and lateral membrane regions with standing incubation (microaerobic conditions), but their localization was lost after shaking (aerobic conditions). A transmembrane receptor of System I also showed polar and lateral localization with standing incubation. By contrast, GFP‐fused components of System II localized constitutively to the flagellated pole. Nitrogen gas, sodium azide or carbonylcyanide m‐chlorophenylhydrazone induced localization of CheA1‐GFP even with shaking incubation, suggesting that the localization is controlled in response to changes in energy metabolism. Fluorescently labeled tetracysteine‐tagged CheA1 also showed azide‐induced localization, arguing against artifactual effects of GFP fusions. These results suggest that System I components are assembled into the supramolecular signaling complex in response to reduced cellular energy states, raising the possibility that the System I complex plays a role in sensing and signaling under microaerobic environments, such as in the host intestine.     

Polar positional information in Escherichia coli spherical cells

Shigella surface protein IcsA and its cytoplasmic derivatives are localized to the old pole of rod-shaped cells when expressed in Escherichia coli. In spherical mreB cells, IcsA is targeted to ectopic sites and close to one extremity of actin-like MamK filament. To gain insight into the properties of the sites containing polar material, we studied the IcsA localization in spherical cells. GFP was exported into the periplasm via the Tat pathway and used as a periplasmic space marker. GFP displayed zonal fluorescence in both mreB and rodA-pbpA spherical E. coli cells, indicating an uneven periplasmic space. Deconvolution images revealed that the cytoplasmic IcsA fused to mCherry was localized outside or at the edge of the GFP zones. These observations strongly suggest that polar material is restricted to the positions where the periplasm possesses particular structural or biochemical properties.     

Identification and localization of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Genes coding for a classical membrane spanning chemoreceptor (mcpG) and a response regulator (cheY4) were identified in a region of Rhodobacter sphaeroides DNA unlinked to either of the two previously identified chemosensory operons. Immunogold electron microscopy had shown that the expression of chemoreceptors in R. sphaeroides varies with growth conditions. Using GFP fused to the newly identified McpG, we examined the targeting of this single methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) under different growth conditions. The gene encoding the C-terminal McpG-GFP fusion was introduced by homologous recombination into the chromosome, replacing the wild-type gene. The resultant protein localized to the poles of the cell under aerobic, photoheterotrophic and anaerobic dark conditions, demonstrating that this MCP is expressed under all three growth conditions. More protein was always found at one pole than the other. The polar fluorescence increased during the cell cycle, with protein becoming evident at the second pole around the time of septation. At division, each daughter cell had a label at one pole, but the intensity of fluorescence was higher in the daughter cell containing the original labelled pole. McpG localization was not altered in a che Operon 1 deletion strain, lacking CheW1 and CheA1, but a che Operon 2 deletion strain, lacking CheW2, CheW3 and CheA2, showed significantly reduced polar localization. This observation indicates that polar localization of McpG depends on Che proteins encoded by Operon 2, but not homologues encoded by Operon 1.     

Properties of motility in Bacillus subtilis powered by the H+-coupled MotAB flagellar stator, Na+-coupled MotPS or hybrid stators MotAS or MotPB

Bacillus subtilis has a single set of flagellar rotor proteins that interact with two distinct stator-force generators, the H+-coupled MotAB complex and the Na+-coupled MotPS complex, that energize rotation. Here, motility on soft agar plates and in liquid was assayed in wild-type B.subtilis and strains expressing only one stator, either MotAB, MotPS or hybrid MotAS or MotPB. The strains expressing MotAB or MotAS had an average of 11 flagella/cell while those expressing MotPS or MotPB had an average of seven flagella/cell, and a Mot-less double mutant had three to four flagella/cell. MotAB had a more dominant role in motility than MotPS under most conditions, but MotPS supported comparable motility to MotAB on malate-containing soft agar plating media at elevated pH and Na+. MotAB supported much faster swimming speeds in liquid than MotPS, MotAS or MotPB under all conditions, but a contribution of MotPS to wild-type swimming was discernible from differences in swimming speeds of wild-type and MotAB at elevated viscosity, pH and Na+. Swimming supported by MotPS and MotAS was stimulated by Na+ and elevated pH whereas the converse was true of MotAB and MotPB. This suggests that MotAS is Na+-coupled and MotPB is H+-coupled and that MotB and MotS are major determinants of ion-coupling. However, the swimming speed supported by MotPB, as well as MotPS and MotAS, was inhibited severely at Na+ concentrations above 300 mM whereas MotAB-dependent swimming was not. The presence of either the MotP or MotS component in the stator also conferred sensitivity to inhibition by an amiloride analogue. These observations suggest that MotP contributes to Na+-coupling and inhibition by Na+ channel inhibitors. Similarly, a role for MotA in H+-dependent stator properties is indicated by the larger effects of pH on the Na+-response of MotAS versus MotPS. Finally, optimal function at elevated viscosity was found only in MotPS and MotPB and is therefore conferred by MotP.     

Biogenesis of YidC Cytoplasmic Membrane Substrates Is Required for Positioning of Autotransporter IcsA at Future Poles

Localization of proteins to specific sites within bacterial cells is often critical to their function. In rod-shaped bacteria, proteins involved in diverse and important cell processes localize to the cell poles. The molecular mechanisms by which these proteins are targeted to the pole, however, are poorly understood. The Shigella autotransporter protein IcsA, which is localized to the pole on the surface of the bacterium, is targeted to the pole in the cytoplasm by a mechanism that is conserved across multiple Gram-negative bacterial species and has thus served as an important and informative model for studying polar localization. We present evidence that in Escherichia coli, the establishment of polar positional information recognized by IcsA requires the activity of the cytoplasmic membrane protein insertase YidC. We show that the role of YidC in IcsA localization is independent of the cell septation and cytokinesis proteins FtsQ and FtsEX. FtsQ is required for polar localization of IcsA and, based on cross-linking studies, is inserted in the vicinity of YidC, but, we find, is not dependent on YidC for membrane insertion. FtsEX is a YidC substrate, but we find that it is not required for polar localization of IcsA. These findings indicate that polar positional information recognized by IcsA depends on one or more membrane proteins that require YidC for proper membrane insertion.     

Identification of a component of Drosophila polar granules

Information necessary for the formation of pole cells, precursors of the germ line, is provided maternally and localized to the posterior pole of the Drosophila egg. The maternal origin and posterior localization of polar granules suggest that they may be associated with pole cell determinants. We have generated an antibody (Mab46F11) against polar granules. In oocytes and early embryos, the Mab46F11 antigen is sharply localized to the posterior embryonic pole. In pole cells, it becomes associated with nuclear bodies within, and nuage around, the nucleus. Immunoreactivity remains associated with cells of the germ line throughout the life cycle of both males and females. This antibody recognizes a 72-74 X 10(3) Mr protein and is useful both as a pole lineage marker and in biochemical studies of polar granules.     

Protein sequences and cellular factors required for polar localization of a histidine kinase in Caulobacter crescentus

The Caulobacter crescentus sensor kinase DivJ is required for an early cell division step and localizes at the base of the newly formed stalk during the G1-to-S-phase transition when the protein is synthesized. To identify sequences within DivJ that are required for polar localization, we examined the ability of mutagenized DivJ sequences to direct localization of the green fluorescent protein. The effects of overlapping C-terminal deletions of DivJ established that the N-terminal 326 residues, which do not contain the kinase catalytic domain, are sufficient for polar localization of the fusion protein. Internal deletions mapped a shorter sequence between residues 251 and 312 of the cytoplasmic linker that are required for efficient localization of this sensor kinase. PleC kinase mutants, which are blocked in the swarmer-to-stalked-cell transition and form flagellated, nonmotile cells, also fail to localize DivJ. To dissect the cellular factors involved in establishing subcellular polarity, we have examined DivJ localization in a pleC mutant suppressed by the sokA301 allele of ctrA and in a pleD mutant, both of which display a supermotile, stalkless phenotype. The observation that these Mot(+) strains localize DivJ to a single cell pole indicate that localization may be closely coupled to the gain of motility and that normal stalk formation is not required. We have also observed, however, that filamentous parC mutant cells, which are defective in DNA segregation and the completion of cell separation, are motile and still fail to localize DivJ to the new cell pole. These results suggest that formation of new sites for DivJ localization depends on events associated with the completion of cell separation as well as the gain of motility. Analysis of PleC and PleD mutants also provides insights into the function of the His-Asp proteins in cell cycle regulation. Thus, the ability of the sokA301 allele of ctrA to bypass the nonmotile phenotype of the pleC null mutation provides evidence that the PleC kinase controls cell motility by initiating a signal transduction pathway regulating activity of the global response regulator CtrA. Analysis of the pleD mutant cell cycle demonstrates that disruption of the swarmer-to-stalked-cell developmental sequence does not affect the asymmetric organization of the Caulobacter cell cycle.     

Isolation and identification of new inner membrane-associated proteins that localize to cell poles in Escherichia coli

Several bacterial structures, processes and proteins are localized primarily to the poles of rod-shaped cells. To better understand this cellular organization, we devised a new method for identifying proteins that localize to the poles of Escherichia coli. Pole-derived membrane fragments were isolated by affinity capture of vesicles containing the chemotaxis protein, Tar; and for comparison, vesicles representing all parts of the cytoplasmic membrane were captured by expressing a Tar variant that was no longer pole-specific. A combination of one-dimensional SDS-PAGE and semi-quantitative mass spectrometry identified 31 proteins that were highly enriched in polar vesicles. Five were chemotaxis proteins known to be pole-specific and another, Aer, was an aerotaxis protein that had not yet been localized to the pole. The behaviour of these internal controls validated the overall approach. GFP-fused derivatives of four candidates (Aer, YqjD, TnaA and GroES) formed polar foci that were distinct from inclusion bodies. TnaA-GFP and GroES-GFP were functional, formed a single focus per cell, and competed for polar localization with the wild-type versions of these proteins. Polar localization of TnaA, GroES and YqjD was disrupted in cells lacking the MinCDE proteins, suggesting that this system may help localize proteins not involved in cell division.     

Glucose induces delocalization of a flagellar biosynthesis protein from the flagellated pole

To survive in a continuously changing environment, bacteria sense concentration gradients of attractants or repellents, and purposefully migrate until a more favourable habitat is encountered. While glucose is known as the most effective attractant, the flagellar biosynthesis and hence chemotactic motility has been known to be repressed by glucose in some bacteria. To date, the only known regulatory mechanism of the repression of flagellar synthesis by glucose is via downregulation of the cAMP level, as shown in a few members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Here we show that, in Vibrio vulnificus, the glucose‐mediated inhibition of flagellar motility operates by a completely different mechanism. In the presence of glucose, EIIA^Glc is dephosphorylated and inhibits the polar localization of FapA (flagellar assembly protein A) by sequestering it from the flagellated pole. A loss or delocalization of FapA results in a complete failure of the flagellar biosynthesis and motility. However, when glucose is depleted, EIIA^Glc is phosphorylated and releases FapA such that free FapA can be localized back to the pole and trigger flagellation. Together, these data provide new insight into a bacterial strategy to reach and stay in the glucose‐rich area.     

Assembly of motor proteins, PomA and PomB, in the Na+-driven stator of the flagellar motor

PomA and PomB are transmembrane proteins that form the stator complex in the sodium-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus and are believed to surround the rotor part of the flagellar motor. We constructed and observed green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of the stator proteins PomA and PomB in living cells to clarify how stator proteins are assembled and installed into the flagellar motor. We were able to demonstrate that GFP-PomA and GFP-PomB localized to a cell pole dependent on the presence of the polar flagellum. Localization of the GFP-fused stator proteins required their partner subunit, PomA or PomB, and the C-terminal domain of PomB, which has a peptidoglycan-binding motif. Each of the GFP-fused stator proteins was co-isolated with its partner subunit from detergent-solubilized membrane. From these lines of evidence, we have demonstrated that the stator proteins are incorporated into the flagellar motor as a PomA/PomB complex and are fixed to the cell wall via the C-terminal domain of PomB.     

Development of a bicistronic expression system in the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna

The viral 2A peptides have recently been used for bicistronic expression in various organisms. In this system, a single mRNA that codes for two proteins flanking the 2A peptide can be translated simultaneously into each protein by ribosomal skipping at this peptide sequence. Here, we tested the function of the Thosea asigna insect virus 2A (T2A) peptide in the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna—an emerging model of evolutionary developmental biology. First, we used transgenic Daphnia that expresses a potential bicistronic RNA containing mCherry and histone H2B‐ green fluorescent protein (GFP) open reading frames upstream and downstream of the T2A sequence, respectively. Microscopic observation revealed difference of localization of the two proteins in the cell, homogenous distribution of mCherry and nuclear localization of H2B‐GFP. Second, we changed localization of mCherry from cytoplasm to plasma membrane by attachment of a consensus myristoylation motif in the bicistronic reporter. RNA that codes for this new bicistronic reporter was injected into eggs. At gastrulation stage, we found spectrally distinct fluorescence with enough intensity and resolution to detect membrane localized mCherry and nuclear GFP. These results indicate that the T2A peptide functions in D. magna and T2A‐mediated bicistronic expression would be a promising tool for evo‐devo studies of this species.     

Mitochondrial small ribosomal RNA is present on polar granules in early cleavage embryos of Drosophila melanogaster

In Drosophila, formation of the germline progenitors, the pole cells, is induced by polar plasm localized in the posterior pole region of early embryos. The polar plasm contains polar granules, which act as a repository for the factors required for pole cell formation. It has been postulated that the factors are stored as mRNA and are later translated on polysomes attached to the surface of polar granules. Here, the identification of mitochondrial small ribosomal RNA (mtsrRNA) as a new component of polar granules is described. The mtsrRNA was enriched in the polar plasm of the embryos immediately after oviposition and remained in the polar plasm throughout the cleavage stage until pole cell formation. In situ hybridization at an ultrastructural level revealed that mtsrRNA was enriched on the surface of polar granules in cleavage embryos. Furthermore, the localization of mtsrRNA in the polar plasm depended on the normal function of oskar, vasa and tudor genes, which are all required for pole cell formation. The temporal and spatial distribution of mtsrRNA is essentially identical to that of mitochondrial large ribosomal RNA (mtlrRNA), which has been shown to be required for pole cell formation. Taken together, it is speculated that mtsrRNA and mtlrRNA are part of the translation machinery localized to polar granules, which is essential for pole cell formation.