Specific contacts between the bacteriophage T3, T7, and SP6 RNA polymerases and their promoters

The specificity and structural simplicity of the bacteriophage T3, T7, and SP6 RNA polymerases make these enzymes particularly well suited for studies of polymerase-promoter interactions. To understand the initial recognition process between the enzyme and its promoters, DNA fragments that carry phage promoters were chemically modified by three different methods: base methylation, phosphate ethylation, and base removal. The positions at which these modifications prevented or enhanced binding by the RNA polymerases were then determined. The results indicate that specific contacts within the major groove of the promoter between positions-5 and -12 are important for phage polymerase binding. Removal of individual bases from either strand of the initiation region (-5 to +3) resulted in enhanced binding of the polymerase, suggesting that disruption of the helix in this region may play a role in stabilization of the polymerase-promoter complexes.     

Sequence and analysis of the gene for bacteriophage T3 RNA polymerase.

The RNA polymerases encoded by bacteriophages T3 and T7 have similar structures, but exhibit nearly exclusive template specificities. We have determined the nucleotide sequence of the region of T3 DNA that encodes the T3 RNA polymerase (the gene 1.0 region), and have compared this sequence with the corresponding region of T7 DNA. The predicted amino acid sequence of the T3 RNA polymerase exhibits very few changes when compared to the T7 enzyme (82% of the residues are identical). Significant differences appear to cluster in three distinct regions in the amino-terminal half of the protein. Analysis of the data from both enzymes suggests features that may be important for polymerase function. In particular, a region that differs between the T3 and T7 enzymes exhibits significant homology to the bi-helical domain that is common to many sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. The region that flanks the structural gene contains a number of regulatory elements including: a promoter for the E. coli RNA polymerase, a potential processing site for RNase III and a promoter for the T3 polymerase. The promoter for the T3 RNA polymerase is located only 12 base pairs distal to the stop codon for the structural gene.     

A combined in vitro / in vivo selection for polymerases with novel promoter specificities

Background  

The DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from T7 bacteriophage (T7 RNAP) has been extensively characterized, and like other phage RNA polymerases it is highly specific for its promoter. A combined in vitro / in vivo selection method has been developed for the evolution of T7 RNA polymerases with altered promoter specificities. Large (10³ – 10⁶) polymerase libraries were made and cloned downstream of variant promoters. Those polymerase variants that can recognize variant promoters self-amplify both themselves and their attendent mRNAs in vivo. Following RT / PCR amplification in vitro, the most numerous polymerase genes are preferentially cloned and carried into subsequent rounds of selection.     

Soluble expression of cloned phage K11 RNA polymerase gene in Escherichia coli at a low temperature.

The gene 1 of the Klebsiella phage K11 encoding the phage RNA polymerase was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction of the Pfu DNA polymerase, cloned and expressed under the control of tac promoter in Escherichia coli. Although the gene was efficiently expressed in E. coli BL21 cells at 37 degrees C, most of the K11 RNA polymerase produced was insoluble, in contrast to soluble expression of the cloned T7 RNA polymerase gene. Coexpression of the bacterial chaperone GroES and GroEL genes together did not help solubilize the K11 RNA polymerase. When the temperature of cell growth was lowered, however, solubility of the K11 RNA polymerase was increased substantially. It was found much more soluble when expressed at 25 degrees C than at 30 and 37 degrees C. Thus, the cloned K11 RNA polymerase gene was expressed in E. coli mostly to the soluble form at 25 degrees C. The protein was purified to homogeneity by chromatography using DEAE-Sephacel and Affigel-blue columns and was found to be active in vitro with the K11 genome or a K11 promoter. The purified K11 RNA polymerase showed highly stringent specificity for the K11 promoter. Low-level cross-reactivity was shown with the SP6 and T7 consensus promoters, while no activity shown with the T3 consensus promoter at all.     

Substitution of a single bacteriophage T3 residue in bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase at position 748 results in a switch in promoter specificity.

The bacteriophage T3 and T7 RNA polymerases (RNAP) are closely related, yet exhibit high specificity for their own promoter sequences. In this work the primary determinant of T7 versus T3 promoter specificity has been localized to a single amino acid residue at position 748 in the T7 RNAP. Substitution of this residue (Asn) with the corresponding residue found in T3 RNAP (Asp) results in a switch in promoter specificity, and specifically alters recognition of the base pairs (bp) at positions -11 and, possibly, -10 in the promoter. A complementary mutation in T3 RNAP (T3-D749N) results in a similar switch in promoter preference for that enzyme. The hierarchy of bp preference by the mutant and wild-type enzymes for bp at -10 and -11, and the results of previous experiments, lead to a model for specificity in which it is proposed that N748 in T7 RNAP (and D749 in T3 RNAP) make specific hydrogen bonds with bases at -11 and -10 on the non-template strand in the major groove. The specificity determining region of T7 RNAP does not appear to exhibit homology to any known sequence-dependent DNA binding motif.     

Structure of T7 RNA polymerase complexed to the transcriptional inhibitor T7 lysozyme.

The T7 RNA polymerase-T7 lysozyme complex regulates phage gene expression during infection of Escherichia coli. The 2.8 A crystal structure of the complex reveals that lysozyme binds at a site remote from the polymerase active site, suggesting an indirect mechanism of inhibition. Comparison of the T7 RNA polymerase structure with that of the homologous pol I family of DNA polymerases reveals identities in the catalytic site but also differences specific to RNA polymerase function. The structure of T7 RNA polymerase presented here differs significantly from a previously published structure. Sequence similarities between phage RNA polymerases and those from mitochondria and chloroplasts, when interpreted in the context of our revised model of T7 RNA polymerase, suggest a conserved fold.     

A General Mechanism for Viral Resistance to Suicide Gene Expression

Bacteriophage T7 was challenged with either of two toxic genes expressed from plasmids. Each plasmid contained a different gene downstream of a T7 promoter; cells harboring each plasmid caused an infection by wild-type T7 to abort. T7 evolved resistance to both inhibitors by avoidance of the plasmid expression system rather than by blocking or bypassing the effects of the specific toxic gene product. Resistance was due to a combination of mutations in the T7 RNA polymerase and other genes expressed at the same time as the polymerase. Mutations mapped to sites that are unlikely to alter polymerase specificity for its cognate promoter but the basis for discrimination between phage and plasmid promoters in vivo was not resolved. A reporter assay indicated that, relative to wild-type phage, gene expression from the plasmid was diminished several-fold in cells infected by the evolved phages. A recombinant phage, derived from the original mutant but lacking a mutation in the gene for RNA polymerase, exhibited intermediate activity in the reporter assay and intermediate resistance to the toxic gene cassettes. Alterations in both RNA polymerase and a second gene are thus responsible for resistance. These findings have broad evolutionary parallels to other systems in which viral inhibition is activated by viral regulatory signals such as defective-interfering particles, and they may have mechanistic parallels to the general phenomena of position effects and gene silencing. Received: 18 July 2000 / Accepted: 8 February 2001