GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制

肽链释放因子(polypeptide release factor, RF)是参与细胞内蛋白质合成终止过程中新生肽链释放的一组重要的蛋白质,包括两类,即第一类肽链释放因子(classⅠrelease factor, RFⅠ)和第二类肽链释放因子(classⅡrelease factor, RFⅡ).关于第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制和功能位点是目前分子细胞生物学领域的一个研究热点,第二类肽链释放因子作为一类GTP酶,在第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子和肽链释放过程中的协同作用也备受关注.近些年来,通过构建体内和体外的测活体系,对第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制的研究取得了一些进展,提出了多种假说和模型,尤其是对第一类肽链释放因子的晶体结构及两类肽链释放因子复合体的空间结构的研究,为揭示真核生物细胞内蛋白质合成终止机制提供了直接的证据.     

蛋白质生物合成的第四步：翻译终止后复合物的解体

蛋白质合成过程一般被归纳为由合成的起始、肽链的延伸和合成的终止组成的三步曲 . 然而,随着对核糖体再循环因子 (ribosome recycling factor , RRF) 在蛋白质合成过程中作用的深入研究,人们提出了蛋白质生物合成应是四步曲, 这第四步就是翻译终止后核糖体复合物的解体 , 也就是通常说的核糖体循环再利用 . 简要地介绍了翻译终止后复合物解体的可能机制：核糖体再循环因子和蛋白质合成延伸因子 G 在核糖体上协同作用催化这一过程的完成 .     

Regulation of GTPases in the bacterial translation machinery

Several GTPases participate in bacterial protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 controls the formation of the ribosomal initiation complex and places initiator fMet-tRNAfMet in the ribosomal P-site. Elongation factors Tu and G are responsible for codon-specific binding of the aminoacyl-tRNA to the A-site, and peptidyl-tRNA to the P-site, respectively, during the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis. Release factor 3, a GTPase which is not ubiquitous, is involved in termination and release of the nascent polypeptide. Other translation factors, including initiation factors 1 and 3, elongation factor Ts, release factors 1 and 2, and ribosomal release factor do not belong to the family of GTP/GDP binding proteins. The guanosine nucleotide binding domains of the GTPases involved in translation are structurally related to the Galpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins and to the proteins of the Ras family. We have identified and sequenced all genes coding for translation factors in the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. The proteins were overproduced in Escherichia coli, purified, biochemically characterised and used for crystallisation and structural analysis. Further biochemical investigations were aimed at gaining insight into the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of the GTPase activity of the translation factors, and to elucidate the role of their ribosomal binding sites in this process.     

A mathematical modelling framework for elucidating the role of feedback control in translation termination

Translation is the final stage of gene expression where messenger RNA is used as a template for protein polymerization from appropriate amino acids. Release of the completed protein requires a release factor protein acting at the termination/stop codon to liberate it. In this paper we focus on a complex feedback control mechanism involved in the translation and synthesis of release factor proteins, which has been observed in different systems. These release factor proteins are involved in the termination stage of their own translation. Further, mutations in the release factor gene can result in a premature stop codon. In this case translation can result either in early termination and the production of a truncated protein or readthrough of the premature stop codon and production of the complete release factor protein. Thus during translation of the release factor mRNA containing a premature stop codon, the full length protein negatively regulates its production by its action on a premature stop codon, while positively regulating its production by its action on the regular stop codon. This paper develops a mathematical modelling framework to investigate this complex feedback control system involved in translation. A series of models is established to carefully investigate the role of individual mechanisms and how they work together. The steady state and dynamic behaviour of the resulting models are examined both analytically and numerically.     

Structural basis for translation termination by archaeal RF1 and GTP-bound EF1�� complex

When a stop codon appears at the ribosomal A site, the class I and II release factors (RFs) terminate translation. In eukaryotes and archaea, the class I and II RFs form a heterodimeric complex, and complete the overall translation termination process in a GTP-dependent manner. However, the structural mechanism of the translation termination by the class I and II RF complex remains unresolved. In archaea, archaeal elongation factor 1 alpha (aEF1α), a carrier GTPase for tRNA, acts as a class II RF by forming a heterodimeric complex with archaeal RF1 (aRF1). We report the crystal structure of the aRF1·aEF1α complex, the first active class I and II RF complex. This structure remarkably resembles the tRNA·EF–Tu complex, suggesting that aRF1 is efficiently delivered to the ribosomal A site, by mimicking tRNA. It provides insights into the mechanism that couples GTP hydrolysis by the class II RF to stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis by the class I RF. We discuss the different mechanisms by which aEF1α recognizes aRF1 and aPelota, another aRF1-related protein and molecular evolution of the three functions of aEF1α.     

Functional sites of interaction between release factor RF1 and the ribosome

Translational release factors decipher stop codons in mRNA and activate hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA in the ribosome during translation termination. The mechanisms of these fundamental processes are unknown. Here we have mapped the interaction of bacterial release factor RF1 with the ribosome by directed hydroxyl radical probing. These experiments identified conserved domains of RF1 that interact with the decoding site of the 30S ribosomal subunit and the peptidyl transferase site of the 50S ribosomal subunit. RF1 interacts with a binding pocket formed between the ribosomal subunits that is also the interaction surface of elongation factor EF-G and aminoacyl-tRNA bound to the A site. These results provide a basis for understanding the mechanism of stop codon recognition coupled to hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA, mediated by a protein release factor.     

Release factor RF-3 GTPase activity acts in disassembly of the ribosome termination complex.

RF3 was initially characterized as a factor that stimulates translational termination in an in vitro assay. The factor has a GTP binding site and shows sequence similarity to elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G. Paradoxically, addition of GTP abolishes RF3 stimulation in the classical termination assay, using stop triplets. We here show GTP hydrolysis, which is only dependent on the simultaneous presence of RF3 and ribosomes. Applying a new termination assay, which uses a minimessenger RNA instead of separate triplets, we show that GTP in the presence of RF3 stimulates termination at rate-limiting concentrations of RF1. We show that RF3 can substitute for EF-G in RRF-dependent ribosome recycling reactions in vitro. This activity is GTP-dependent. In addition, excess RF3 and RRF in the presence of GTP caused release of nonhydrolyzed fmet-tRNA. This supports previous genetic experiments, showing that RF3 might be involved in ribosomal drop off of peptidyl-tRNA. In contrast to GTP involvement of the above reactions, stimulation of termination with RF2 by RF3 was independent of the presence of GTP. This is consistent with previous studies, indicating that RF3 enhances the affinity of RF2 for the termination complex without GTP hydrolysis. Based on our results, we propose a model of how RF3 might function in translational termination and ribosome recycling.     

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3.

Termination of translation in higher organisms is a GTP-dependent process. However, in the structure of the single polypeptide chain release factor known so far (eRF1) there are no GTP binding motifs. Moreover, in prokaryotes, a GTP binding protein, RF3, stimulates translation termination. From these observations we proposed that a second eRF should exist, conferring GTP dependence for translation termination. Here, we have shown that the newly sequenced GTP binding Sup35-like protein from Xenopus laevis, termed eRF3, exhibits in vitro three important functional properties: (i) although being inactive as an eRF on its own, it greatly stimulates eRF1 activity in the presence of GTP and low concentrations of stop codons, resembling the properties of prokaryotic RF3; (ii) it binds and probably hydrolyses GTP; and (iii) it binds to eRF1. The structure of the C-domain of the X.laevis eRF3 protein is highly conserved with other Sup35-like proteins, as was also shown earlier for the eRF1 protein family. From these and our previous data, we propose that yeast Sup45 and Sup35 proteins belonging to eRF1 and eRF3 protein families respectively are also yeast termination factors. The absence of structural resemblance of eRF1 and eRF3 to prokaryotic RF1/2 and RF3 respectively, may point to the different evolutionary origin of the translation termination machinery in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. It is proposed that a quaternary complex composed of eRF1, eRF3, GTP and a stop codon of the mRNA is involved in termination of polypeptide synthesis in ribosomes.     

Bacterial polypeptide release factor RF2 is structurally distinct from eukaryotic eRF1.

Bacterial release factor RF2 promotes termination of protein synthesis, specifically recognizing stop codons UAA or UGA. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli RF2 has been determined to a resolution of 1.8 A. RF2 is structurally distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart eRF1. The tripeptide SPF motif, thought to confer RF2 stop codon specificity, and the universally conserved GGQ motif, proposed to be involved with the peptidyl transferase center, are exposed in loops only 23 A apart, and the structure suggests that stop signal recognition is more complex than generally believed.     

Recent advances in peptide chain termination

Peptide chain termination occurs when a stop codon is decoded by a release factor. In Escherichia coli two codon-specific release factors (RF1 and RF2) direct the termination of protein synthesis, while in eukaryotes a single factor is required. The E. coli factors have been purified and their genes isolated. A combination of protein and DNA sequence data reveal that the RFs are structurally similar and that RF2 is encoded in two reading frames. Frame-shifting from one reading frame to the next occurs at a rate of 50%, is regulated by the RF2-specific stop codon UGA, and involves the direct interaction of the RF2 mRNA with the 3' end of the 16S rRNA. The RF genes are located in two separate operons, with the RF1 gene located at 26.7 min and the RF2 gene at 62.3 min on the chromosome map. Ribosomal binding studies place the RF-binding region at the interface between the ribosomal subunits. A possible mechanism of stop-codon recognition is reviewed.     

Ribosome Rescue and Translation Termination at Non-Standard Stop Codons by ICT1 in Mammalian Mitochondria

Release factors (RFs) govern the termination phase of protein synthesis. Human mitochondria harbor four different members of the class 1 RF family: RF1Lmt/mtRF1a, RF1mt, C12orf65 and ICT1. The homolog of the essential ICT1 factor is widely distributed in bacteria and organelles and has the peculiar feature in human mitochondria to be part of the ribosome as a ribosomal protein of the large subunit. The factor has been suggested to rescue stalled ribosomes in a codon-independent manner. The mechanism of action of this factor was obscure and is addressed here. Using a homologous mitochondria system of purified components, we demonstrate that the integrated ICT1 has no rescue activity. Rather, purified ICT1 binds stoichiometrically to mitochondrial ribosomes in addition to the integrated copy and functions as a general rescue factor, i.e. it releases the polypeptide from the peptidyl tRNA from ribosomes stalled at the end or in the middle of an mRNA or even from non-programmed ribosomes. The data suggest that the unusual termination at a sense codon (AGA/G) of the oxidative-phosphorylation enzymes CO1 and ND6 is also performed by ICT1 challenging a previous model, according to which RF1Lmt/mtRF1a is responsible for the translation termination at non-standard stop codons. We also demonstrate by mutational analyses that the unique insertion sequence present in the N-terminal domain of ICT1 is essential for peptide release rather than for ribosome binding. The function of RF1mt, another member of the class1 RFs in mammalian mitochondria, was also examined and is discussed.     

A novel mutation in ribosomal protein S4 that affects the function of a mutated RF1

Release factors (RF) 1 and 2 trigger the hydrolysis of the peptide from the peptidyl-tRNA during translation termination. RF1 binds to the ribosome in response to the stop codons UAG and UAA, whereas RF2 recognizes UAA and UGA. RF1 and RF2 have been shown to bind to several ribosomal proteins. To study this interaction in vivo, prfA1, a mutant form of RF1 has been used. A strain with the prfA1 mutation is temperature sensitive (Ts) for growth at 42 degrees C and shows an increased misreading of UAG and UAA. In this work we show that a point mutation in ribosomal protein S4 can, on the one hand, make the RF1 mutant strain Ts(+); on the other hand, this mutation increases the misreading of UAG, but not UAA, caused by prfA1. The S4 mutant allele, rpsD101, is a missense mutation (Tyr51 to Asp), which makes the cell cold sensitive. The behaviour of rpsD101 was compared to the well-studied S4 alleles rpsD12, rpsD14, and rpsD16. These three mutations all confer both a Ts (44 degrees C) phenotype and show a ribosomal ambiguity phenotype, which rpsD101 does not. The three alleles were sequenced and shown to be truncations of the S4 protein. None of the three mutations could compensate for the Ts phenotype caused by the prfA1 mutation. Hence, rpsD101 differs in all studied characteristics from the three above mentioned S4 mutants. Because rpsD101 can compensate for the Ts phenotype caused by prfA1 but enhances the misreading of UAG and not UAA, we suggest that S4 influences the interaction of RF1 with the decoding center of the ribosome and that the Ts phenotype is not a consequence of increased readthrough.     

Indirect regulation of translational termination efficiency at highly expressed genes and recoding sites by the factor recycling function of Escherichia coli release factor RF3.

Prokaryotic release factor RF3 is a stimulatory protein that increases the rate of translational termination by the decoding release factors RF1 and RF2. The favoured model for RF3 function is the recycling of RF1 and RF2 after polypeptide release by displacing the factors from the ribosome. In this study, we have demonstrated that RF3 also plays an indirect role in the decoding of stop signals of highly expressed genes and recoding sites by accentuating the influence of the base following the stop codon (+4 base) on termination signal strength. The efficiency of decoding strong stop signals (e.g. UAAU and UAAG) in vivo is markedly improved with increased RF3 activity, while weak signals (UGAC and UAGC) are only modestly affected. However, RF3 is not responsible for the +4 base influence on termination signal strength, since prfC- strains lacking the protein still exhibit the same qualitative effect. The differential effect of RF3 at stop signals can be mimicked by modest overexpression of decoding RF. These findings can be interpreted according to current views of RF3 as a recycling factor, which functions to maintain the concentration of free decoding RF at stop signals, some of which are highly responsive to changes in RF levels.     

Mapping functionally important motifs SPF and GGQ of the decoding release factor RF2 to the Escherichia coli ribosome by hydroxyl radical footprinting. Implications for macromolecular mimicry and structural changes in RF2

The function of the decoding release factor (RF) in translation termination is to couple cognate recognition of the stop codon in the mRNA with hydrolysis of the completed polypeptide from its covalently linked tRNA. For this to occur, the RF must interact with specific A-site components of the active centers within both the small and large ribosomal subunits. In this work, we have used directed hydroxyl radical footprinting to map the ribosomal binding site of the Escherichia coli class I release factor RF2, during translation termination. In the presence of the cognate UGA stop codon, residues flanking the universally conserved (250)GGQ(252) motif of RF2 were each shown to footprint to the large ribosomal subunit, specifically to conserved elements of the peptidyltransferase and GTPase-associated centers. In contrast, residues that flank the putative "peptide anticodon" of RF2, (205)SPF(207), were shown to make a footprint in the small ribosomal subunit at positions within well characterized 16 S rRNA motifs in the vicinity of the decoding center. Within the recently solved crystal structure of E. coli RF2, the GGQ and SPF motifs are separated by 23 A only, a distance that is incompatible with the observed cleavage sites that are up to 100 A apart. Our data suggest that RF2 may undergo gross conformational changes upon ribosome binding, the implications of which are discussed in terms of the mechanism of RF-mediated termination.     

Structural aspects of translation termination on the ribosome

Translation of genetic information encoded in messenger RNAs into polypeptide sequences is carried out by ribosomes in all organisms. When a full protein is synthesized, a stop codon positioned in the ribosomal A site signals termination of translation and protein release. Translation termination depends on class I release factors. Recently, atomic-resolution crystal structures were determined for bacterial 70S ribosome termination complexes bound with release factors RF1 or RF2. In combination with recent biochemical studies, the structures resolve long-standing questions about translation termination. They bring insights into the mechanisms of recognition of all three stop codons, peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, and coordination of stop-codon recognition with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. In this review, the structural aspects of these mechanisms are discussed.     

Quantitative analysis of in vivo ribosomal events at UGA and UAG stop codons.

An in vivo translation assay system has been designed to measure, in one and the same assay, the three alternatives for a ribosome poised at a stop codon (termination, read-through and frameshift). A quantitative analysis of the competition has been done in the presence and absence of release factor (RF) mutants, nonsense suppressors and an upstream Shine-Dalgarno-like sequence. The ribosomal +1 frameshift product is measurable when the stop codon is decoded by wild-type or mutant RF (prf A1 or prf B2) and also in the presence of competing suppressor tRNAs. Frameshift frequency appears to be influenced by RF activity. The amount of frameshift product decreases in the presence of competing suppressor tRNAs, however, this decrease is not in proportion to the corresponding increase in the suppression product. Instead, there is an increase in the total amount of protein expressed from the gene, perhaps due to the purging of queued ribosomes. Mutated RFs reduce the total output of the reporter gene by reducing the amount of all three protein products. The nascent peptide has earlier been shown to influence the translation termination process by interacting with the RFs. At 42 degrees C in a temperature-sensitive RF mutant strain, protein measurements indicate that the nascent peptide seems to influence the binding efficiencies of the RFs.     

Functional characterization of yeast mitochondrial release factor 1

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial release factor was expressed from the cloned MRF1 gene, purified from inclusion bodies, and refolded to give functional activity. The gene encoded a factor with release activity that recognized cognate stop codons in a termination assay with mitochondrial ribosomes and in an assay with Escherichia coli ribosomes. The noncognate stop codon, UGA, encoding tryptophan in mitochondria, was recognized weakly in the heterologous assay. The mitochondrial release factor 1 protein bound to bacterial ribosomes and formed a cross-link with the stop codon within a mRNA bound in a termination complex. The affinity was strongly dependent on the identity of stop signal. Two alleles of MRF1 that contained point mutations in a release factor 1 specific region of the primary structure and that in vivo compensated for mutations in the decoding site rRNA of mitochondrial ribosomes were cloned, and the expressed proteins were purified and refolded. The variant proteins showed impaired binding to the ribosome compared with mitochondrial release factor 1. This structural region in release factors is likely to be involved in codon-dependent specific ribosomal interactions.     

The function, structure and regulation of E. coli peptide chain release factors

The termination of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli depends upon the soluble protein factors RF1 or RF2. RF1 catalyzes UAG and UAA dependent termination, while RF2 catalyzes UGA and UAA dependent termination. The proteins have been purified to homogeneity, their respective genes isolated, and their primary structures deduced from the DNA sequences. The sequences reveal considerable conserved homology, presumably reflecting functional similarities and a common ancestral origin. The RFs are encoded as single copy genes on the bacterial chromosome. RF2 exhibits autogenous regulation in an in vitro translation system. The mechanism of autoregulation appears to be an in-frame UGA stop codon that requires a 1+ frameshift for the continued synthesis of the protein. Frameshifting prior to the inframe stop codon occurs at a remarkably high frequency by an unknown mechanism. Future studies will be directed at understanding how RFs interact with the ribosomal components, and further defining the mechanism of RF2 frameshifting.