En bloc cervical lipectomy for treatment of the problem neck in facial rejuvenation surgery

The treatment of cervical fat in facial aesthetic surgery has received much attention in recent years. Suction lipectomy has become a very popular technique for removing cervical fat because it is easy to perform and results in few complications. This paper describes the en bloc excision of cervical fat in conjunction with rhytidectomy. The senior author has treated 1,000 patients over 17 years using this technique with a high degree of patient satisfaction and minimal morbidity. Although suction lipectomy alone may be indicated for the younger patient, our experience suggests that the en bloc excisional technique is the treatment of choice in the older patient in whom a rhytidectomy is also indicated. In contrast with suction lipectomy, we have found that the en bloc excision of cervical fat allows for more anatomic dissection and facilitates removal of greater amounts of fat and better redraping of the cervical skin.     

Gynecomastia: suction lipectomy as a contemporary solution

Suction lipectomy is adapted for the correction of gynecomastia. Previous attempts using suction lipectomy for gynecomastia still required the use of sharp dissection for removal of the glandular breast tissue as well as excision of redundant skin. With this new technique, gynecomastia is corrected solely with the use of suction lipectomy. The technique is successful if the gynecomastia is due to excess fat or parenchymal hypertrophy. A 7-mm cannula is inserted first, to remove the adipose tissue. Then a 2.4-mm cannula is used to remove the glandular and ductal tissue. The 7-mm cannula is then reinserted to remove subareolar parenchyma and to make final contour adjustments. The surrounding subcutaneous tissue is easily undermined to avoid a saucer deformity and to allow for skin contraction. Patients return to full activities in 48 hours. A compressive garment is worn for 4 to 6 weeks. The results of 10 patients are discussed.     

Suction lipectomy of the neck

Suction lipectomy of the neck has been advocated in other reports. However, because of skin laxity, a simultaneous face/neck lift has been performed usually. In this series of 49 patients, ages 18 to 73, removal of submandibular fat was performed by suction lipectomy. A simultaneous face/neck lift was not done. In addition, no skin was excised. On the contrary, the apparent excess skin was found to be required for contouring. Approximately one-third of the patients had a simultaneous chin implant. Others had different aesthetic surgical procedures performed during the same operation. The removal of neck fat by suction has proven to be more efficacious than excisional methods of lipectomy. The risks of operation have been found comparable to suction lipectomy performed in other anatomic locations.     

Suction-assisted lipectomy for correction of 202 figure faults in 101 patients: indications, limitations, and applications

Since its introduction in the United States, suction-assisted lipectomy has proven to be a safe, effective technique for correction of figure faults. It has been greeted with considerable skepticism by many practitioners, however, owing to the poor results many have obtained in their initial attempts to apply similar techniques. Suction lipectomy using the blunt technique is a safe procedure that can yield consistently good results when appropriately applied. It is suggested that the principal reason others have had difficulty involves problems in patient selection. The technique may not be effective for the correction of generalized obesity and cannot be expected to dramatically alter overall appearance. Patients should be selected for treatment of specific "figure faults" and educated as to what may realistically be expected. The patient's emotional and psychological condition must be taken into consideration. We report a series of 101 patients treated with a total of 202 separate suction lipectomy procedures with good results and only two minor complications. A survey of patients treated by the method reveals a generally high level of satisfaction and some of the ambivalence that might be anticipated from such a technique.     

The effect of epinephrine on blood loss during suction lipectomy

In a prospective, double-blind, controlled study on 26 consecutive patients who underwent suction lipectomy, the injection of epinephrine (1:250,000, 1:500,000, or 1:1,000,000) was not found to decrease fluid/blood loss when compared with saline injection or no injection at all. Since our study fails to support the use of epinephrine to lessen fluid/blood loss during suction lipectomy, we have abandoned its use in that procedure.     

Gynecomastia: analysis of 159 patients and current recommendations for treatment

Gynecomastia has been treated surgically in 159 patients during the past 22 1/2 years. Prior to 1980, all patients had traditional excision, which was followed by a high incidence of complications and undesired sequelae, not the least of which was that the results of this aesthetic operation were often unaesthetic. Since 1980, when suction lipectomy became the cornerstone of treatment, the results have been much better. As a result, current recommendations for treatment are as follows: If the gynecomastia is entirely due to fat, suction lipectomy alone is sufficient treatment. However, since suction will not remove breast parenchyma, those patients whose gynecomastia is due to parenchymal hypertrophy also require local excision of the parenchyma. Skin excision is rarely, if ever, necessary.     

The use of liposuction to contour cherubism

Yet another application of suction lipectomy equipment is presented to remove the pathologic tissue in cherubism. Owing to the variations of consistency of the material in this condition, this technique may not be successful in all patients, but it is certainly recommended when indicated.     

Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts

The use of suction lipectomy to reduce breast volume is described. The technique applies only to a very limited group of patients whose nipple-areola complexes are normally located and whose enlargement is primarily fibrofatty in nature. Suction mammaplasty can be used as a sole technique in congenital asymmetry or in post-reduction enlargement or asymmetry.     

The influence of permanent magnetic field therapy on wound healing in suction lipectomy patients: a double-blind study

The authors present their experience with the healing influence of permanent magnets on postoperative wounds. The responses of 20 patients who underwent suction lipectomy and postoperative negative magnetic field therapy were studied in a double-blind fashion. Magnets in the form of patches (10 patients) or sham magnet patches (10 patients) were placed over the operative region in each of the patients. Pain, edema, and discoloration (ecchymosis) were evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 days postoperatively. Our results show that the treatment group had significant reductions in pain on postoperative days 1 through 7, in edema on days 1 through 4, and in discoloration on days 1 through 3 when compared with the control group. These results demonstrated that commercially available magnets have a positive influence on the postoperative healing process in suction lipectomy patients.     

Suction lipectomy: complications and results by survey

In October of 1983, we sent a questionnaire on suction lipectomy to 2524 U.S. and Canadian members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Six-hundred and twelve plastic surgeons returned questionnaires (24.2 percent response rate). One-hundred and seven responding surgeons reported 1573 operations in which suction lipectomy with or without skin excision was used for 2685 procedures on various parts of the body. In the subset of 1249 operations in which suction lipectomy only was used to treat 2261 anatomic areas, surgeons reported greater than 80 percent good or excellent aesthetic results. The overall complication rate was 9.3 percent. The most frequent complications were persistent hypesthesia (2.6 percent), seroma (1.6 percent), and persistent edema (1.4 percent). Skin pigmentation, pain, hematoma, infection, and slough each occurred with an incidence of 1.0 percent or less. Based on the results of this survey, suction lipectomy is a valuable new modality for surgical improvement of body contour.     

Quantitative analysis of blood and fat in suction lipectomy aspirates

This study of suction lipectomy aspirates from 15 consecutive patients was undertaken to biochemically quantitate the blood-to-fat ratios of the aspirates. A wide variation in the blood-to-fat ratios (8 to 54 percent) was noted, but the authors failed to demonstrate any relationship between the blood-to-fat ratios and the suction lipectomy operative site. Prophylactic measures to allow treatment of patients in a consistently safe manner include carefully screening of patients to exclude those with bleeding disorders or significant illnesses, perioperative oral iron therapy, infiltrating the operation site with a dilute epinephrine solution, hydrating the patients adequately perioperatively, using smaller-diameter cannulas for the aspiration, minimizing aspiration once the aspirate turns grossly bloody, and limiting the aspirate to a volume of less than 1750 ml for any operative procedure.     

Regional fat aspiration for body contouring

Our experience with the original suction lipectomy is presented. The fat removal, done with a specially designed suction tube, is performed layerwise, creating a continuous, regular cavity that is transformed into a virtual space by compressive dressings. The main indication being excessive peritrochanteric fat pads, the operation is done under either epidural or general anesthesia. No antibiotics or anticoagulants are administered, and the patients are mobilized as soon as fully awake. Practicing suction-assisted lipectomy for more than seven years, we have never observed an infection, thrombosis, or fat embolism. In experienced hands, good results can be expected in about 80 percent of patients. Complications are almost always of an aesthetic nature as a result of bad indications. The method is not a surgical treatment for severe obesity.     

Subcutaneous pseudobursa secondary to suction and surgery

Suction lipectomy has been used throughout the regions of the body to remove vast amounts of subcutaneous fat. The blunt technique allows for a multiplicity of small (4 to 6 mm) channels to be created and the fat removed by suction with little disturbance of the overlying skin, the supporting septa, vessels, or nerves. Abdominolipectomy has been successfully performed for decades, in which large amounts of skin and subcutaneous fat are removed by sharp dissection. The undermining involved in an adbominolipectomy extending from the xiphoid to pubis and laterally to the level of the iliac crest and then supplemented by the suction technique has led to the formation, in some cases, of chronic seromas not relieved by multiple aspirations. Healing and contractions of these seromas causes a deformity of the overlying skin, because it is puckered and drawn upon itself. This results in the formation of a subcutaneous pseudobursa lined by collagen sheets but no epithelial cells. We present 9 patients who have demonstrated this phenomenon. We suggest that in the largest resections, safety is best served by waiting a period of at least 6 weeks between suction and subsequent resection.     

Large-volume suction lipectomy: an analysis of 108 patients.

Suction lipectomy was initially advocated for the treatment of localized collections of fat and for the removal of less than 1500 ml of material. However, many patients wished to have multiple areas treated or had diffuse collections of fat. In such instances, the removal of over 1500 ml of material and circumferential lipectomy are necessary to provide optimal aesthetic results. However, when over 1500 ml of material is removed, anesthetic requirements, fluid replacement, and treatment of blood loss become important if the operation is to be performed safely. We have treated 108 patients who had over 1500 ml of material removed. Eight-eight percent of the patients were female; 12 percent were male. Using the body-mass index, 3 percent of patients were underweight, 70 percent were normal weight, and 27 percent were overweight. Fifty-five patients (51 percent) had 1500 to 2499 ml of material removed, 26 patients (24 percent) had 2500 to 3499 ml removed, 16 patients (15 percent) had 3500 to 4499 ml removed, and 11 patients (10 percent) had over 4500 ml removed. All patients were treated in the hospital; 44 percent were admitted after surgery. A total of 227 units of autologous and 2 units of homologous blood were transfused. As measured by a computerized monitor, the average amount of blood in the material removed from thighs was 30 percent; from abdomens, the blood loss was 45 percent. The aesthetic results were generally excellent. No complications were encountered. A few patients developed undesired sequelae, the most common of which was seroma formation, which occurred in 19 percent of those who had suction of abdominal-wall fat. We believe that large-volume suction lipectomy is safe and efficacious, provided attention is directed to such important aspects of patient care as anesthesia, fluid replacement, and blood loss.     

Aesthetic abdominal deformities: a personal approach to the posterior rectus sheath and rectus muscles

We have detailed our experience with abdominoplasty. The technique is based on undermining of the rectus abdominis muscle, treatment of the posterior sheath, and limited resection of the medial edge of the rectus muscle. The fatty and muscular redundancy in the epigastric region has been eliminated by resection of the muscle edge or local suction lipectomy.     

Fat redistribution following suction lipectomy: defense of body fat and patterns of restoration

No randomized studies in humans have examined whether fat returns after removal or where it returns. We undertook a prospective, randomized-controlled trial of suction lipectomy in nonobese women to determine if adipose tissue (AT) is defended and if so, the anatomic pattern of redistribution. Healthy women with disproportionate AT depots (lower abdomen, hips, or thighs) were enrolled. Baseline body composition measurements included dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (a priori primary outcome), abdominal/limb circumferences, subcutaneous skinfold thickness, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (torso/thighs). Participants (n = 32; 36 ± 1 year) were randomized to small-volume liposuction (n = 14, mean BMI: 24 ± 2 kg/m(2)) or control (n=18, mean BMI: 25 ± 2) following baseline. Surgery group participants underwent liposuction within 2-4 weeks. Identical measurements were repeated at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year later. Participants agreed not to make lifestyle changes while enrolled. Between-group differences were adjusted for baseline level of the outcome variable. After 6 weeks, percent body fat (%BF) by DXA was decreased by 2.1% in the lipectomy group and by 0.28% in the control group (adjusted difference (AD): -1.82%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.79% to -0.85%; P = 0.0002). This difference was smaller at 6 months, and by 1 year was no longer significant (0.59% (control) vs. -0.41% (lipectomy); AD: -1.00%; CI: -2.65 to 0.64; P = 0.23). AT reaccumulated differently across various sites. After 1 year the thigh region remained reduced (0.77% (control) vs. -1.83% (lipectomy); AD: -2.59%; CI: -3.91 to -1.28; P = 0.0001), but AT reaccumulated in the abdominal region (0.64% (control) vs. 0.42% (lipectomy); AD: -0.22; CI: -2.35 to 1.91; P = 0.84). Following suction lipectomy, BF was restored and redistributed from the thigh to the abdomen.     

Computerized suction lipectomy aspirator monitor for improved results in suction lipectomy

A new computerized suction aspirator monitor is described. This device offers the benefits of instantaneous and concurrent scientifically accurate readout of aspirate contents in five separate bodily areas. Thus knowledge of amounts of blood versus fat can be immediately known without resorting to guess, estimate, or cumbersome lipocrit determination by centrifuging. Advantages of such a device include better accuracy in determination of fat removal from each area, with improvement of symmetrical fat removal. More exact determination of blood loss with improved hemodynamic replacement is also more easily and safely accomplished. In an area of mystique, experience, artistry, and aesthetic appreciation which has cloaked the initial enthusiasm for suction lipectomy, a new generation of scientific accuracy is now possible. Thus accurate determination of aspirate content vis-a-vis fat and blood can now transform this procedure into a more sophisticated and scientifically accurate operation which traditionally is desired by most practitioners of suction lipectomy.     

Toxic shock syndrome after suction lipectomy

We present a case of toxic shock syndrome with necrotizing fasciitis after suction lipectomy. The patient underwent aesthetic suction lipectomy of the abdomen, buttocks, and thighs during an office procedure by a cosmetic surgeon. On postoperative day 2, the patient was referred to the emergency department of our hospital because of pain. On admission, the patient was in toxic shock. She required intensive medical treatment for about 1 month, along with psychiatric help to adapt after the illness. Although toxic shock syndrome is a rare postoperative complication, every plastic surgeon should be acquainted with it. A combination of early recognition, diagnosis, and aggressive supportive therapy is the only successful treatment.     

Skin retraction following suction lipectomy by treatment site: a study of 500 procedures in 458 selected subjects

I identified 500 suction lipectomy procedures involving sites on the body and in the cervicofacial region in 458 selected patients and studied the influence of treatment site on postoperative skin retraction by comparing preoperative and postoperative skin condition. Postoperative skin condition was evaluated first in the immediate postoperative period (second or third day); then at a more remote date (after at least 2 months of follow-up). On the body, restoration of the preoperative condition of the skin was obtained in 94.6 percent of treatment sites in the immediate postoperative period; after a longer follow-up, this proportion was 87.9 percent because of delayed development of modifications. The time interval needed to obtain a stable result increased with increasing age, regardless of the nature of this result, as well as with the total amount of fat removed. On the neck, liposuction improved or even eliminated preexisting skin looseness, and this improvement was even more noticeable as follow-up increased. The neck thus appears as the site of choice for suction lipectomy. On the face, in contrast, favorable results deteriorated over time, a finding that leads me to advocate combination with a face-lift whenever ptosis is present. Thus treatment site obviously has a substantial impact on the potential of the skin for retracting postoperatively.     

The tumescent technique: the effect of high tissue pressure and dilute epinephrine on absorption of lidocaine

Injection of lidocaine into the subcutaneous tissues by the tumescent technique results in a delayed absorption of the local anesthetic and has allowed clinicians to exceed the maximum recommended dose of lidocaine without reported complications. However, little knowledge exists about the mechanisms that permit such high doses of lidocaine to be used safely with this technique. The presence of low concentration epinephrine and the increased tissue pressure resulting from the tumescent injection have both been implicated as important factors, but neither has been studied in patients whose results were not altered by the variability of the suction procedure. The purpose of this work was to determine the effect of tissue pressure during tumescent injection and presence of low concentration epinephrine on the absorption of lidocaine from subcutaneous tissues in human volunteers. Twenty healthy female human volunteers were randomized into four study groups. After body fat measurements, all subjects received an injection of 7 mg/kg of lidocaine into the subcutaneous tissues of both lateral thighs. The injected solution consisted of 0.1% lidocaine and 12.5 meq/liter sodium bicarbonate in normal saline with or without 1:1,000,000 epinephrine. Tissue pressure was recorded during injection using a specially designed double-barreled needle. The time required for injection was also recorded. Subjects in group 1 received lidocaine with epinephrine injected by a high-pressure technique. Group 2 subjects received lidocaine with epinephrine injected by a low-pressure technique. Group 3 subjects received lidocaine without epinephrine injected under high pressure. Group 4 subjects received lidocaine without epinephrine injected under low pressure. Following injection, sequential blood samples were drawn over a 14-hour period, and plasma lidocaine concentrations were determined by gas chromatography. No suction lipectomy was performed. Maximum tissue pressure during injection was 339 +/- 63 mmHg and 27 +/- 9 mmHg using high- and low-pressure techniques, respectively. Addition of 1:1,000,000 epinephrine, regardless of the pressure of injected fluid, significantly delayed the time to peak plasma concentration by over 7 hours. There was no significant difference in the peak plasma concentration of lidocaine among the four groups. Peak plasma concentrations greater than 1 mcg/ml were seen in 11 subjects. Epinephrine (1:1,000,000) significantly delays the absorption of lidocaine administered by the tumescent technique. High pressure generated in the subcutaneous tissues during injection of the solution does not affect lidocaine absorption. The delay in absorption may allow time for some lidocaine to be removed from the tissues by suction lipectomy. In addition, the slow rise to peak lidocaine concentration in the epinephrine groups may allow the development of systemic tolerance to high lidocaine plasma levels.