Contrasting responses of phytoplankton and benthic algae to recent nutrient enrichment in Arctic tundra ponds

相似文献   

The Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation and Nutrient Additions on Periphyton Biomass and Composition in a Sub‐Alpine Lake (Castle Lake,USA)

Rising levels of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) striking the Earth's surface have led to numerous studies assessing its inhibitory effects on phytoplankton and periphyton in aquatic systems. Mineral nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) have been shown to increase aspects of algal metabolism and compensate for UVR inhibition. An in situ substratum enrichment technique and UV shielding was used to assess the effects of nutrient additions on periphyton exposed to different levels of UVR in Castle Lake, California during July‐August, 1997. UV shielding had no effect on total periphyton biomass, but caused shifts in species composition. The dominant periphyton species, Anabaena circinalis RAB., demonstrated sensitivity to ambient levels of UV radiation possibly due to UV inhibition of N2 ‐fixation. Total diatom biovolume decreased when shielded from UVR. Phosphorus additions continually elicited an increase in periphyton biovolume at all levels of analysis. These results suggest an interaction between nutrient status/availability and UV sensitivity.     

Effects of nutrients and light on periphytic biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in a tropical black-water aquatic ecosystem

This article aims to test the light-nutrient hypothesis (LNH) in a periphytic community in a tropical black-water lake. Individual and interactive effects of light and nutrient availability were assessed with periphyton biomass accrual, nutrient content, and nutrient stoichiometry. We performed a manipulative field experiment with a 4 × 2 factorial design. We used nutrient diffusing substrates to produce four different nutrients treatments: Control (no nutrient added), nitrogen amended (N), phosphorus amended (P) and combined N and P amendment (NP). Two light levels were also considered: high light (near surface water) and low light (near bottom water). Light and nutrients individually and interactively caused significant changes in aggregate periphyton community properties. Total and autotrophic biomasses were significantly higher in high light conditions and in nutrient enriched treatments. Autotrophic biomass was significantly higher in N enriched treatment whereas total biomass was mainly affected by the joint addition of N and P. At lower light availability periphyton growth was limited, even in enriched treatments. Light also strongly affected periphyton nutrient content. Periphyton C, N and P in general increased when subjected to high light conditions. As predicted by the LNH, light promoted an increase in periphyton C:P ratios in P deprived treatments, but an opposite effect was observed on C:N ratios, especially in N-enriched treatments. This experiment revealed that light availability strongly limits the propagation of nutrient effects on periphyton growth. Such complex interdependencies on basal resources affect the proportion of autotrophic to total periphytic biomass that can be an important mechanism to explain variation in the nutrient stoichiometry of periphyton in nature.     

Effects of nutrients and grazers on periphyton phosphorus in lake enclosures

SUMMARY. 1. Periphyton. measured as particulate phosphorus (PP) and expressed as periphyton PP, growing on vertically oriented substrata (polyvinyl impregnated nylon) under different nutrient loadings, light intensities (exposures), and grazer communities was examined in eight large enclosures (750 m3) where nutrients (N and P) and planktivorous fish (1+yellow perch) were added in a 2x2 factorial design.
2. During the first 3 weeks of the experiment (25 June to 15 July), there was a significantly higher accumulation of phosphorus into periphyton (periphyton PP) with fertilization, but fish addition had no effect. During the fourth to seventh weeks (16 July to 12 August), addition of fish was associated with lower abundance of amphipods and chironomids and higher concentration of periphyton PP. In the enclosures without fish, these invertebrates were over 25 times more abundant, and periphyton PP decreased substantially compared to the June-July period. Fertilization increased periphyton PP only at high exposures in the enclosures with fish.
3. Exposure had a significant effect on periphyton PP. In the enclosures with fish, high abundance of nanoplankton reduced water transparency, and periphyton PP was lower in the deeper waters which may have been due to limitation by low light. Lower periphyton PP was also observed at the surface on sunny sides of enclosures without fish, and therefore with high water transparency. This pattern may have been due to inhibitory effects of high light intensity.
4. Periphyton communities in the enclosures with fish had higher uptake rates for planktonic phosphorus, and lower rates of phosphorus release, suggesting that periphyton with high phosphorus demand may have high internal cycling of assimilated phosphorus.     

Effects of nutrients and light on periphyton biomass and nitrogen uptake in Mediterranean streams with contrasting land uses

1. Nutrient diffusing substrata (NDS) were used to determine the relative importance of nutrients and light as potential limiting factors of periphyton biomass and nitrogen (N) uptake in Mediterranean streams subjected to different human impacts. The nutrients examined were phosphorus (P) and N, and we also further differentiated between the response of periphyton communities to N species (i.e. NO₃‐N and NH₄‐N). To examine the effect of light and nutrients on periphyton biomass, chlorophyll a accrual rates on NDS located at open and closed canopy sites were compared. The effect of nutrient availability on periphyton uptake was measured by ¹⁵N changes on the NDS after NO₃‐¹⁵N short‐term nutrient additions. 2. Results show that light was the main factor affecting algal biomass in the study streams. Algal biomass was in general higher at open than at closed canopy sites. Nutrient availability, as simulated with the NDS experiments, did not enhance algal biomass accrual in either of the 2 light conditions. 3. In the control treatments (i.e. ambient concentrations), periphyton NO₃‐N uptake rates increased and C : N molar ratios decreased consistently with increases in N availability across streams. NO₃‐N uptake rates were altered when ambient N concentrations were increased artificially in the N amended NDS. Periphyton assemblages growing on N enriched substrata seemed to preferentially take up N diffusing from the substratum rather than N from the water column. This response differed among streams, and depended on ambient N availability. 4. Periphyton biomass was not significantly different between substrata exposed to the two forms of available N sources. Nonetheless, we found differences in the effects of both N sources on the uptake of N from the water column. NH₄‐N seemed to be the preferred source of N for periphyton growing on NDS. 5. Results suggest that the effect of riparian zones on light availability, although seldom considered by water managers, may be more important than nutrients in controlling eutrophication effects derived from human activities. Finally, our results confirm that not only increases in concentration, but also stoichiometric imbalances should be considered when examining N retention in human altered streams.     

Patterns of nutrient release from nutrient diffusing substrates in flowing water

As nutrient diffusing substrates age, the availability of nutrients to periphyton may decline with time either because of diffusion or dilution of nutrients into the water column or because of the effects of grazing by herbivores. Typically, large amounts of nutrients are added to nutrient diffusing substrates (NDS) to insure continuous enrichment throughout experimental periods of 2 to 8 weeks. This study examined the release of phosphates and nitrates from NDS exposed to three different current velocities (0.07 m s^–1, 0.11 m s^–1, 0.20 m s^–1) in recirculating laboratory flumes. Replicated agar samples from four treatments (control, nitrate (N), phosphate (P), and N+P) were sampled throughout 32 days (day 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 32). Increasing concentrations of agar were required to solidify the P and N+P treatments.Nutrient release rates from NDS were independent of agar concentrations (with the exception of [PO₄] in the medium velocity flume). Nutrient concentrations in the agar of spiked samples declined substantially within a week when exposed to flowing water. Nitrates were retained in agar to a greater extent than phosphates particularly when NDS were exposed to low or medium flows. Although floods physically remove or abrade periphyton in natural streams, findings from this laboratory study suggest that ambient flows deplete the availability of nutrient concentrations to potential periphyton colonizers within the first week of incubation. Because of the rapid decline of nutrients from NDS, short incubation periods in natural running waters seem warranted.     

Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton and periphyton growth in upland lakes

SUMMARY 1. Thirty small upland lakes in Cumbria, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were visited three times between April and August 2000. On each occasion water chemistry was measured and phytoplankton bioassays were performed in the laboratory to assess growth‐rate and yield limitation by phosphorus and nitrogen. In addition, yield limitation of periphyton growth was investigated twice, in situ, using nutrient‐diffusing substrata. 2. Over the whole season the percentage frequency of P, N and co‐limitation was 24, 13 and 63%, respectively, for phytoplankton rate limitation and 20, 22 and 58%, respectively, for phytoplankton yield limitation. 3. A clear response of periphyton yield to nutrient additions was found in 75% of all cases and of these, co‐limitation was most common (54%). Average percentage frequency for P and N limitation was 26 and 20%, respectively. 4. Phytoplankton and periphyton showed seasonal changes in nutrient limitation within sites. In particular, co‐limitation became progressively more common as the season progressed. 5. The response of phytoplankton growth rate to ammonium and nitrate addition was identical, but ammonium was a slightly better source of nitrogen than nitrate for phytoplankton yield on 7% and for periphyton yield on 10% of the occasions. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. 6. The concentration of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and the molar ratio of DIN to total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), appeared to be the main environmental factors controlling the extent of nitrogen or phosphorus limitation at a given site. Nitrogen limitation was more likely than phosphorus limitation where the DIN was <6.5 mmol m^?3 and the ratio of DIN : TDP was <53. Co‐limitation was the most likely outcome at a DIN concentration <13 mmol m^?3 and at a DIN : TDP molar ratio <250. Above these values phosphorus limitation was most likely. 7. The relatively high frequency of nitrogen limitation and co‐limitation at higher N : P ratios than previously reported, may result from the inability of nitrogen‐fixing cyanobacteria to thrive in these upland lakes where pH and the concentration of phosphorus tended to be low and where flushing rates tended to be high.     

Ecological responses to nutrients in streams and rivers of the Colorado mountains and foothills

1. Abundance and composition of periphyton and benthic macroinvertebrates were treated as potential nutrient response variables for 74 streams in montane Colorado. The streams ranged from unenriched to mildly enriched with nutrients (N, P). 2. The study showed no meaningful relationship between periphyton biomass accumulation and concentrations of total or dissolved forms of nitrogen or phosphorus. Nutrient concentrations were also unrelated to periphyton and macroinvertebrate richness, diversity and community composition. Macroinvertebrate communities did, however, show a strong positive relationship to periphyton abundance. 3. A positive response of periphyton biomass to increasing nutrient concentrations has been well documented over large ranges of nutrient concentrations. Our study suggests that the nutrient response is suppressed by other controlling factors on the lower limb of the nutrient response curve (i.e. at low nutrient concentrations); a quantitatively significant response occurs only in excess of a threshold beyond which nutrients become dominant over other controlling factors. This interpretation of the results is consistent with published meta‐analyses showing lack of nutrient response for a high proportion of experimentally enriched periphyton communities, and division of responses between N and P for communities that do show growth in response to enrichment. 4. Grazing probably is not the key controlling variable for periphyton in Colorado mountain streams, given that the highest chlorophyll concentrations are associated with the highest abundances of macroinvertebrates. Modelling indicates that the initial amount of periphyton biomass at the start of the growing season, in conjunction with elevation‐related length of the growing season and water temperature, explains most of the variation in periphyton accumulation among these streams, but there is a yet unexplained suppression of periphyton growth rates across all elevations.     

Periphyton nutrient status in a temperate stream with mixed land-uses: implications for watershed nitrogen storage

We sampled periphyton communities in a highly productive stream to characterize how longitudinal changes in watershed geology and land use affect periphyton nutrient status and elemental composition. Nutrient status was evaluated from measures of periphyton nutrient composition (carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus), stable isotope signatures (δ¹⁵N and δ¹³C), and the response of periphyton to experimental enrichment with nitrogen. Biomass and nutrient content increased dramatically from the headwaters to downstream, while tissue nutrient ratios (C:P and C:N) were more consistent and did not indicate strong N- or P-limitation. Nitrogen enrichment experiments did not exhibit a consistent response upstream or downstream, and periphyton C:N:P stoichiometry showed no significant response to N-enrichment. Absolute densities of periphyton N were 5- to 90-fold greater than the overlying N concentrations in stream water (159- to 353-fold greater for P), and the δ¹⁵N signal indicates downstream enrichment from likely watershed sources (urban and agriculture land-use). These results suggest that periphyton in Spring Creek are not N-limited and store large quantities of both N and P, which in turn can be transported downstream during high flow events. Handling editor: David Hamilton     

Snail–periphyton interactions in a prairie lacustrine wetland

This study examined the effects of nutrients and macrophytes on snail grazers and periphyton in a prairie wetland food web. Snails (Gyraulus circumstriatus) and periphyton in large enclosures in a lacustrine wetland, Delta Marsh, MB, Canada were subjected to two experimental treatments, nutrient addition (nitrogen, phosphorus) and macrophyte exclusion (using a porous geotextile carpet) during July and August. Snail biomass and periphyton biomass (on both artificial substrata and submerged macrophytes) increased over time in all treatments, representing seasonal growth. Snail biomass was three times higher on macrophytes than on artificial substrata. In response to nutrient addition, snail biomass was significantly elevated over time on macrophytes but not on artificial substrata. Conversely, periphyton biomass was higher on artificial substrata but not on macrophytes in response to nutrient addition. Snail biomass and periphyton biomass on artificial substrata showed no response to macrophyte exclusion. Snail biomass on all substrata was inversely correlated with turbidity, whereas periphyton biomass showed no relationship with turbidity. Timing of nutrient additions to wetlands may influence whether the response occurs primarily in phytoplankton or in periphyton and macrophytes.     

Nitrogen Limitation of Pond Ecosystems on the Plains of Eastern Colorado

Primary production in freshwater ecosystems is often limited by the availability of phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), or a combination of both (NP co-limitation). While N fixation via heterocystous cyanobacteria can supply additional N, no comparable mechanism for P exists; hence P is commonly considered to be the predominant and ultimate limiting nutrient in freshwater ecosystems. However, N limitation can be maintained if P is supplied in stoichiometric excess of N (including N fixation). The main objective of this study was to examine patterns in nutrient limitation across a series of 21 vernal ponds in Eastern Colorado where high P fluxes are common. Across all ponds, water column dissolved inorganic N steadily decreased throughout the growth season due to biological demand while total dissolved P remained stable. The water column dissolved inorganic N to total dissolved P ratios suggested a transition from NP co-limitation to N limitation across the growth season. Periphyton and phytoplankton %C was strongly correlated with %N while %P was assimilated in excess of %N and %C in many ponds. Similarly, in nutrient addition bottle assays algae responded more strongly to N additions (11 out of 18 water bodies) than P additions (2 out of 18 water bodies) and responded most strongly when N and P were added in concert (12 out of 18 water bodies). Of the ponds that responded to nutrient addition, 92% exhibited some sort of N limitation while less than 8% were limited by P alone. Despite multiple lines of evidence for N limitation or NP co-limitation, N fixation rates were uniformly low across most ponds, most likely due to inhibition by water column nitrate. Within this set of 18 water bodies, N limitation or NP co-limitation is widespread due to the combination high anthropogenic P inputs and constrained N fixation rates.     

Controls on periphyton biomass in heterotrophic streams

1. Headwater streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) are typically characterised by a periphyton assemblage of low biomass and diversity. However, periphyton blooms have been observed following catchment deforestation experiments and occasionally during the annual spring thaw before canopy leaf‐out. 2. There is pronounced seasonal variation in both nutrient and light availability in HBEF streams. Stream water nitrogen (N) concentrations and light levels are higher before canopy leaf‐out and after leaf senescence and are lower during the growing season. Periphyton accrual rates also change seasonally; they are highest in spring prior to leaf‐out and significantly lower during summer and in autumn. 3. Periphyton biomass rarely responded positively to in‐situ experimental enrichment with nitrogen or phosphorus. In the summer, nutrient enrichment overall had no effect on periphyton biomass, while outside the growing season N enrichment had inhibitory effects on periphyton. 4. Despite these experimental results, surveys of ambient chlorophyll a concentrations in streams across the HBEF demonstrated no relationship between streamwater dissolved inorganic N or P concentrations and benthic chlorophyll a. 5. Our results suggest that HBEF periphyton communities are not closely regulated by nutrient availability, even during periods of high light availability. The inhibitory effects of nutrient enrichment outside the growing season are interesting, but further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms driving these responses.     

Effects of nutrient loading,temperature regime and grazing pressure on nutrient limitation of periphyton in experimental ponds

相似文献   

Nitrogen limitation of heterotrophic biofilms in boreal streams

相似文献   

Effects of macrograzers and light on periphyton stoichiometry

Ecological stoichiometry describes the biochemical constraints of trophic interactions emerging from the different nutrient content and nutrient demand of producers and consumers, respectively. Most research on this topic originates from well-mixed pelagic food webs, whereas the idea has received far less attention in spatially structured habitats. Here, we test how light as well as grazing and nutrient regeneration by consumers affects growth and biomass of benthic primary producers. In the first laboratory experiment, we manipulated grazer presence (two different snail species plus ungrazed control), in the second experiment we factorially combined manipulation of grazer presence and light intensity. We monitored snail and periphyton biomass as well as dissolved and particulate nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) over time. Grazers significantly reduced algal biomass in both experiments. Grazers affected periphyton nutrient content depending on the prevailing nutrient limitation and their own body stoichiometry. In the nitrogen (N-) limited first experiment, grazers increased N both in the periphyton and in the water column. The effect was stronger for grazers with lower N-content. In the phosphorus (P-) limited second experiment, grazers increased the P-content of the periphyton, but the grazer with lower N-content had additionally positive effects on algal N. Light reduction did not affect periphyton biomass, but increased chlorophyll-, N- and P-content of the periphyton. These experiments revealed that the indirect effects of grazers on periphyton were bound by stoichiometric constraints of nutrient incorporation and excretion.     

Feedbacks of consumer nutrient recycling on producer biomass and stoichiometry: separating direct and indirect effects

Herbivores can have both direct (consumptive) and indirect (nutrient‐mediated) effects on primary producer biomass and nutrient stoichiometry. Ecological stoichiometry theory predicts that herbivores of contrasting body stoichiometry will differentially remineralize nutrients, resulting in feedbacks on producer stoichiometry. We experimentally separated direct and indirect effects of aquatic vertebrate grazers on periphyton by manipulating grazer abundance and identity in mesocosms, and using grazer exclusion cages to expose periphyton to recycled nutrients in the absence of direct grazing. In experiment 1, we used a catfish with high body phosphorus (low body N:P), Ancistrus triradiatus, to assess consumptive versus nutrient‐mediated effects of grazer density on periphyton. In experiment 2, we compared the nutrient‐mediated effects of grazing by Ancistrus triradiatus and Rana palmipes, a tadpole with low body phosphorus and high body N:P. In experiment 1, we found that increasing catfish density led to lower biomass and particulate nutrients in periphyton through direct consumptive effects, but that nutrient‐mediated indirect effects enhanced periphyton biomass when grazers were experimentally separated from direct contact with periphyton. As predicted by stoichiometry theory, nutrient recycling by this P‐rich grazer tended to increase algal C:P and N:P (although effects were not statistically significant), while their consumptive effects reduced algal C:P and N:P. In experiment 2, grazer identity had strong effects on dissolved water nutrient concentrations, N recycling (measured with a ¹⁵N tracer), and periphyton stoichiometry. In accordance with stoichiometry theory, catfish increased N concentrations and recycling rates leading to higher periphyton N:P, while tadpoles had greater effects on P availability leading to lower periphyton N:P. Our experiments elucidate the importance of both the density and identity of grazers in controlling periphyton biomass and stoichiometry through consumptive and nutrient‐mediated effects, and support the power of ecological stoichiometry theory to predict feedbacks on producer stroichiometry arising from consumer stoichiometry through nutrient recycling.     

Nutrient control of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton dynamics

To determine whether positive correlations between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton growth in nutrient addition experiments are due to growth coupling or growth stimulation by the same nutrients, we examined phyto- and bacterioplankton growth in a series of eleven nutrient addition (N × P) and light/dark experiments. In mesotrophic Castle Lake, the phyto- and bacterioplankton growth responses to phosphorus (P) addition were strongly correlated (r²=0.59), while only a weak correlation (r²=0.10) was observed for the nitrogen addition treatments. After normalizing the N + P treatments for the growth stimulation observed in the respective P treatments, we found a substantial stimulation of the phytoplankton (e.g., costimulation by N + P) and no stimulation of the bacterioplankton. Bacteria growth rates were similar in both light and dark incubated P treatments. In these experiments, we found clear evidence suggesting the dynamics of bacteria and phytoplankton were correlated because they are often limited by the same resource (mainly inorganic phosphorus). We found only limited evidence that bacterioplankton growth coupling to algal dynamics was occurring in these experiments. However, we did not consider several factors such as dissolved organic nutrient availability, bacterivory, availability of physical substrates, and temperature which are also thought to influence the nature of bacterial/phytoplankton interactions. Based on the results of our experiments, we conclude the biomass of the bacterio- and phytoplankton covaried because they were stimulated by the same nutrients. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Bioassays with Stigeoclonium Kütz. (Chlorophyceae) to identify nitrogen and phosphorus limitations

Eleven strains of the filamentous algae genus Stigeoclonium Kütz. (Chlorophyceae) were tested as bioassay organisms to identify nitrogen and phosphorus limitations to growth in a variety of waters. The assay results were related to the nutrient status of the waters during the year. Optimal growth was obtained at an inorganic phosphorus concentration of 0.65 mg P 1^?1 and an inorganic nitrogen concentration of 3.75 mg N 1^?1. The algal growth potentials were generally higher in November and February than in August. In summer, nitrogen became important as a limiting nutrient. When ratios of inorganic nitrogen to inorganic phosphorus (N/P) were above 6.2, phosphorus was primarily limiting and at lower N/P ratios nitrogen became the important limiting factor. Stigeoclonium proved to be a suitable bioassay organism to identify nutrient limitation in freshwaters.     

Periphyton growth as an indicator of eutrophication; an experimental approach

Growth of periphyton was studied in the Archipelago Sea (Finland) during summer 1994 as a part of the annual monitoring control of fish farms. Experimental growth plates (Whatman GF/C filters) were incubated (two weeks) at 213 sites in different parts of the Archipelago Sea and in the coastal area north of the Archipelago Sea. At each site incubations were repeated two or three times during the summer (July 4- -September 1). The growth of periphyton was measured as the amount of chlorophyll a (mg m-2) extracted from the incubation plates. The growth varied significantly among different parts of the study area. The strongest growth was observed in the inner archipelago and in areas with high fish production and relatively slow water exchange. In the outer archipelago, rapid water exchange ensured good mixing of nutrients from fish farms and other sources into relatively large water volumes. The local impacts of nutrient loading thus remained too low to be detected by measuring nutrient concentrations or periphyton growth. Periphyton growth was positively correlated with concentrations of total nitrogen, total phosphorus and chlorophyll a in the productivity layer (approximately 2 × Secchi depth). A significant inverse correlation was also shown between periphyton growth and Secchi depth. Archipelago areas with different levels of eutrophication could satisfactorily be distinguished in this study. The results were consequent with previous classifications of the eutrophication levels in the Archipelago Sea. Periphyton studies thus are a useful addition to conventional monitoring programs. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.