X-Y Exchange and the Coevolution of the X and Y Rdna Arrays in Drosophila melanogaster

The nucleolus organizers on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster are the sites of 200-250 tandemly repeated genes for ribosomal RNA. As there is no meiotic crossing over in male Drosophila, the X and Y chromosomal rDNA arrays should be evolutionarily independent, and therefore divergent. The rRNAs produced by X and Y are, however, very similar, if not identical. Molecular, genetic and cytological analyses of a series of X chromosome rDNA deletions (bb alleles) showed that they arose by unequal exchange through the nucleolus organizers of the X and Y chromosomes. Three separate exchange events generated compound X·Y ^L chromosomes carrying mainly Y-specific rDNA. This led to the hypothesis that X-Y exchange is responsible for the coevolution of X and Y chromosomal rDNA. We have tested and confirmed several of the predictions of this hypothesis: First, X· Y^L chromosomes must be found in wild populations. We have found such a chromosome. Second, the X·Y^L chromosome must lose the Y^L arm, and/or be at a selective disadvantage to normal X⁺ chromosomes, to retain the normal morphology of the X chromosome. Six of seventeen sublines founded from homozygous X·Y^Lbb stocks have become fixed for chromosomes with spontaneous loss of part or all of the appended Y^L. Third, rDNA variants on the X chromosome are expected to be clustered within the X⁺ nucleolus organizer, recently donated (" Y") forms being proximal, and X-specific forms distal. We present evidence for clustering of rRNA genes containing Type 1 insertions. Consequently, X-Y exchange is probably responsible for the coevolution of X and Y rDNA arrays.     

The genes for ribosomal RNA in diploid and polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

The proportion of the Drosophila genome coding for ribosomal RNA was examined in DNA from both diploid and polytene tissues of Drosophila melanogaster by rRNA-DNA hybridization. Measurements were made on larvae with one, two, three and four nucleolus organizer regions per genome. In DNA from diploid tissues the percent rDNA (coding for 28S and 18S ribosomal DNA) was found to be in proportion to the number of nucleolus organizers present. The number of rRNA genes within a nucleolus organizer therefore does not vary in response to changes in the number of nucleolus organizers. On the other hand, in DNA from cells with polytene chromosomes the percent rDNA remained at a level of about 0.1% (two to six times lower than the diploid values), regardless of either the number of nucleolus organizers per genome or whether the nucleolus organizers were carried by the X or Y chromosomes. This independence of polytene rDNA content from the number of nucleolus organizers is presumably due to the autonomous polytenization of this region of the chromosome. When the rDNA content of DNA from whole flies is examined, both the rDNA additivity of the diploid cells and the rDNA independence of polytene cells will affect the results. This is a possible explanation for the relative rDNA increase known to occur in X0 flies, but probably not for the phenomenon of rDNA magnification. — In further studies on DNA from larval diploid tissues, the following findings were made: 1) the Ybb-chromosome carries no rDNA; 2) flies carrying four nucleolus organizers do not tend to lose rDNA, even after eleven generations, and 3) the nucleolus organizer on the wild type Y chromosome may have significantly less rDNA than does that on the corresponding X chromosome.     

Variations in the Number of the Y Chromosomal Rrna Genes in DROSOPHILA HYDEI

The number of rRNA cistrons is measured by filter saturation hybridization in different stocks of D. hydei, where the wild-type X chromosome has one nucleolus organizer (NO) and the wild-type Y has two separated NO's. (see PDF) females having no X chromosomal NO show an rDNA content exceeding that of a Y chromosome. An even greater increase in the rRNA cistron number is measured in two translocation stocks where the (see PDF) is combined with one half of a Y and, therefore, each stock contains only one of the two Y chromosomal NO's. But when the same Y fragments are brought together with a wild-type X chromosome they lose about one-half of their rRNA cistrons within one generation. Males with two complementary Y fragments but having no X chromosomal NO show a considerably higher rDNA content than the (see PDF) females, although both are equal in respect of their NO number. Consideration is given to related phenomena in Drosophila melanogaster.     

Cytological and genetic analysis of the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster

By applying quinacrine-, Hoechst- and N-banding techniques to neuroblast prometaphase chromosomes the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster can be differentiated into 25 regions defined by the degree of fluorescence, the stainability after N-banding and the presence of constrictions. Thus these banding techniques provide an array of cytological landmarks along the Y chromosome that makes it comparable to a polytene chromosome for cytogenetic analysis. — 206 Y-autosome translocations (half of them carrying Y-linked sterile mutations) and 24 sterile y ⁺ Y chromosomes were carefully characterized by these banding techniques and used in extensive complementation analyses. The results of these experiments showed that: (1) there are four linearly ordered fertility factors in Y ^L and two fertility factors in Y ^S . (2) These fertility factors map to characteristic regions of the Y chromosome, specifically stained with the N-banding procedure. (3) The most extensively analyzed fertility factors are defined by a series of cytologically non-overlapping and genetically noncomplementing breaks and deficiencies distributed over large chromosome regions. For example, the breakpoints which inactivate the kl-5 and ks-1 loci are scattered along regions that contain about 3,000 kilobases (kb) DNA. Since these enormous regions formally define single genetic functions, the fertility genes of the Y chromosome have an as yet unappreciated physical dimension, being larger than euchromatic genes by two orders of magnitude.     

A New Resource for Characterizing X-Linked Genes in Drosophila melanogaster: Systematic Coverage and Subdivision of the X Chromosome With Nested,Y-Linked Duplications

Interchromosomal duplications are especially important for the study of X-linked genes. Males inheriting a mutation in a vital X-linked gene cannot survive unless there is a wild-type copy of the gene duplicated elsewhere in the genome. Rescuing the lethality of an X-linked mutation with a duplication allows the mutation to be used experimentally in complementation tests and other genetic crosses and it maps the mutated gene to a defined chromosomal region. Duplications can also be used to screen for dosage-dependent enhancers and suppressors of mutant phenotypes as a way to identify genes involved in the same biological process. We describe an ongoing project in Drosophila melanogaster to generate comprehensive coverage and extensive breakpoint subdivision of the X chromosome with megabase-scale X segments borne on Y chromosomes. The in vivo method involves the creation of X inversions on attached-XY chromosomes by FLP-FRT site-specific recombination technology followed by irradiation to induce large internal X deletions. The resulting chromosomes consist of the X tip, a medial X segment placed near the tip by an inversion, and a full Y. A nested set of medial duplicated segments is derived from each inversion precursor. We have constructed a set of inversions on attached-XY chromosomes that enable us to isolate nested duplicated segments from all X regions. To date, our screens have provided a minimum of 78% X coverage with duplication breakpoints spaced a median of nine genes apart. These duplication chromosomes will be valuable resources for rescuing and mapping X-linked mutations and identifying dosage-dependent modifiers of mutant phenotypes.MANY eukaryotes of biomedical and agricultural importance—including humans, other mammals, birds, and Drosophila—are heterogametic. Their sex chromosomes differ drastically in size and genetic composition. In species with X and Y chromosomes, males carry only one copy of each X-linked gene. This poses a serious challenge for experimental geneticists, because males inheriting a mutation in a vital X-linked gene die before they can be used in genetic crosses. In fact, the hemizygosity of X-linked genes in males has been a significant barrier to the functional analysis of many X-linked genes and is largely responsible for the poor genetic characterization of X chromosomes relative to autosomes in most organisms.The lethality of X-linked mutations can be rescued by providing a wild-type copy of the mutated gene elsewhere in the genome. This can be accomplished with a transgenic construct if the molecular identity of the mutated gene is known. In many cases, however, the mutated gene has not been identified and it is necessary to provide wild-type function with a multigene interchromosomal duplication, i.e., a segment of the X inserted in another chromosome. If the proximal and distal extents of the duplicated segment are known, phenotypic rescue maps the mutated gene to the defined X chromosome region.Multigene deletions can also be used to map X-linked mutations by complementation, but crosses between individuals carrying deletions and X-linked lethal mutations are impossible without rescuing the lethality of either the deletion or the lethal mutation in males. Projects at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and elsewhere (Parks et al. 2004; Ryder et al. 2007) have generated large collections of deletions with molecularly defined breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster, but the utility of the X deletions is limited without duplications of the corresponding chromosomal regions.Duplications are potentially important for gene discovery. Identifying sets of genes involved in the same cellular process is a major focus of functional genomics research and this can be accomplished genetically by identifying dosage-sensitive modifiers of mutant phenotypes. Often, increasing or decreasing the copy number of a gene will enhance or suppress the phenotype associated with mutating another gene involved in the same process. Screening collections of deletions is a popular way to identify interacting genes in Drosophila (for examples, see Seher et al. 2007; Zhao et al. 2008; Aerts et al. 2009; Salzer et al. 2010) and was a major impetus for the assembly of the Bloomington Stock Center “Deficiency Kit,” which provides maximal coverage of the genome with the fewest deletions. Though dosage-sensitive modifiers could also be identified using increased gene dosage, the use of duplications in enhancer and suppressor screens remains largely unexplored. Assembling sets of duplications providing efficient genomic coverage would likely popularize this experimental approach.The size of duplicated segments determines how duplication chromosomes are used experimentally. Small duplicated segments allow high resolution gene mapping, but they are not suitable for other purposes. Only large duplicated segments are capable of rescuing the lethality of sizable multigene X deletions. Likewise, large duplicated segments provide efficiency in initially localizing mutations and identifying dosage-dependent modifiers. Despite their usefulness, interchromosomal duplications of large segments are among the hardest chromosomal rearrangements to isolate. In Drosophila, many existing duplications were recovered fortuitously as three-breakpoint aberrations following irradiation, but such rearrangements are rare and difficult to identify in screens. Other duplications were methodically constructed from preexisting rearranged chromosomes. This approach works well when it is possible, but it can be used only when progenitor aberrations with appropriate breakpoints are available. Because of these difficulties, the selection of duplication strains generated by Drosophila workers over the past several decades is not satisfactory for many purposes. The duplications are often difficult to use experimentally, their breakpoints are sparsely distributed along the X chromosome and only roughly mapped, and substantial gaps in coverage exist. Obviously, improved duplication resources are needed.Here we present the methodology and progress of a project at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center to construct interchromosomal duplications of large, megabase-scale X segments. Our approach builds on the long history of manipulating Drosophila chromosomes in vivo (Novitski and Childress 1976; Ashburner et al. 2005), but we have eliminated the need for preexisting aberrations by generating progenitor chromosomes using the FLP-FRT system. Indeed, this site-specific recombination system has had an enormous impact on the ability of fly geneticists to engineer many kinds of novel chromosomes (Golic and Golic 1996; Parks et al. 2004; Ryder et al. 2007). We will demonstrate how we have combined FLP-mediated recombination and other chromosome manipulation techniques to produce Y-linked duplications of large X segments. As we will show, appending X segments to Y chromosomes rather than autosomes has advantages both for the synthesis and experimental use of X duplications.To date, we have generated a minimum of 78% X coverage with duplication breakpoints spaced a median of nine genes apart. We anticipate completion of the project within the coming year. Using these duplications, mutations and genetic modifiers can be mapped first to large X intervals using a tiling set of the largest duplicated segments and then to small chromosome intervals using subsets of the duplications. These duplications will also facilitate deletion mapping. The creation of a set of stocks providing complete duplication coverage and extensive breakpoint subdivision of the X chromosome in a consistent genetic background will remove an impediment to investigating the functions of X-linked genes that has frustrated generations of Drosophila geneticists.     

Variation in Y Chromosome Segregation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Functional variation among Y chromosomes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster was assayed by a segregation study. A total of 36 Y chromosomes was extracted and ten generations of replacement backcrossing yielded stocks with Y chromosomes in two different genetic backgrounds. Eleven of the Y chromosomes were from diverse geographic origins, and the remaining 25 were from locally captured flies. Segregation of sexes in adult offspring was scored for the four possible crosses among the two backgrounds with each Y chromosome. Although the design confounds meiotic drive and effects on viability, statistical partitioning of these effects reveals significant variation among lines in Y chromosome segregation. Results are discussed in regards to models of Y-linked segregation and viability effects, which suggest that Y-linked adaptive polymorphism is unlikely.     

Drosophila melanogaster has different ribosomal RNA sequences on S and Y chromosomes.

The primary structures of ribosomal RNAs transcribed from the nucleolus organizers on X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster were compared by RNase T₁ fingerprints made with two different systems; i.e. homochromatography on DEAE-cellulose, and polyethyleneimine-cellulose thin-layer chromatography.Ribosomal RNA derived from the X-linked nucleolus organizer was obtained from a strain producing only female larvae and ribosomal RNA derived from the Y-linked nucleolus organizer was isolated from a mutant lacking the X-linked nucleolus organizer.No difference was detected between the fingerprints of 28 S RNA from these animals.In 18 S RNA, however, one oligonucleotide showed a remarkable difference in mobility. The structure of the X-linked organizer-specific oligonucleotide was 5′ U-C-U-U-U-U-U-U-C-C-U-A-U-G 3′, and that of the Y-linked organizer-specific oligonucleotide was 5′ U-C-U-C-U-U-U-U-C-C-U-A-U-G 3′, indicating one base substitution (U á3 C) between them.The absence of 5′-temninal phosphate in this oligonucleotide and available sequence data also suggest that these oligonucleotides did not come from either the 5′ or 3′ terminus of 18 S RNA.D. simulans, whose Y chromosome has no nucleolus organizer (Ritossa &; Atwood, 1966), showed an 18 S RNA fingerprint having only the X-linked organizer-specific oligonucleotide.We conclude from these results that in Drosophila the ribosomal RNA gene sequences are different for the two nucleolus organizers located on the X and Y chromosomes. The implications of those findings concerning the parallel evolution of these genes are discussed.     

Conformation change of cytochrome c. II. Ferricytochrome c refinement at 1.8 A and comparison with the ferrocytochrome structure

The X chromosomal nucleolus organizer of Drosophila hydei contains about 500 ribosomal RNA genes. The 28 S rRNA coding region of about 50% of these genes is interrupted by an intervening sequence of 6.0 × 10³ base-pairs. Restriction enzyme analysis revealed that more than 90% of the rRNA genes with intervening sequences are present as one or a few clusters within the X chromosomal nucleolus organizer. Furthermore, even though X chromosomal rRNA genes show several distinct size classes of non-transcribed spacers, the cluster of repeating units containing an intervening sequence has major spacer lengths of 4.4 × 10³ and 4.6 × 10³ base-pairs; spacers 5.1 × 10³ base-pairs in length are mainly linked with genes lacking the intervening sequence.     

The ribosomal DNA of Calliphora erythrocephala; an analysis of hybrid plasmids containing ribosomal DNA

We have analysed the ribosomal DNA of Calliphora erythrocephala, a Dipteran fly of the same sub-order as Drosophila melanogaster, through a series of rDNA² fragments cloned in a plasmid vector. We have mapped the sites for eight restriction enzymes within these plasmids, and positioned the regions coding for the 18 S and 28 S rRNAs within the maps of selected plasmids using the S₁ endonuclease mapping procedure of Berk & Sharp (1977). This analysis establishes that some rDNA cistrons of C. erythrocephala contain an “intron” (Gilbert, 1978) which interrupts the 28 S coding region at the same position as that of D. melanogaster rDNA. Two introns of 2.85 kilobases in length and part of a longer, sequence-related variant were isolated in these cloned fragments. Restriction enzyme site analysis and preliminary hybridization data indicate that the 2.85 kb intron of C. erythrocephala is largely unrelated in sequence to the two classes of D. melanogaster rDNA introns.     

Localization of the lampbrush loop pair Nooses on the Y chromosome of Drosophila hydei by fluorescence in situ hybridization

We have used fluorescence in situ hybridization to map the positions of the different repetitive DNA sequences from the region forming the lampbrush loop pair Nooses on the Y chromosome of Drosophila hydei. This region harbours a megabase cluster of tandemly organized repeats of the Y-specific ay1 family and a megabase cluster of tandem repeats of the related Y-specific YsI family. In addition, ay1 repeats also occur in short blocks that are interspersed by other repetitive DNA sequences that we call Y-associated, since they have additional copies on other chromosomes. Using specific probes for ay1, YsI and Y-associated DNA sequences, we show that there is one large proximal cluster of YsI repeats and one, more distally located, large cluster of ay1 repeats. The Y-chromosomal copies of the Y-associated sequences are located in the most distal part of the ay1 cluster. This is consistent with the juxtaposition of ay1 and Y-associated sequences in more than 300 kb of cloned genomic DNA. Since both ay1 and Y-associated sequences have been shown to be transcribed in the Nooses, the lampbrush loop is formed in a distal region of the short arm of the Y chromosome, adjacent to the terminally located nucleolus organizer region. The clusters of homogeneous ay1 and YsI repeats are of no functional significance for the formation of the lampbrush loop.     

Synaptonemal complex of the sex-autosome trivalent in a male Indian muntjac

Bright-field microscopy of silver-stained pachytene spermatocytes of a male Indian muntjac, Muntiacus muntjak revealed that (a) the synapsis between the autosomal homologs, including the long arm of the X and Y₂, was normal, (b) the nucleolus organizer regions were present in both the No. 1 bivalent and the long arm of the X and Y₂, (c) the accessory structures of the X chromosome short arm in the forms of light and dark thickenings and the hairpin-like bend were present despite the X-autosome translocation, (d) a short synaptonemal complex was present between the Y₁ (real Y) and the short arm of the X chromosome, and (e) the centromeric orientation of the Y₁ and Y₂ chromosomes was in Cis configuration as opposed to the X chromosome.     

Quantification of urinary S- and N-homocysteinylated protein and homocysteine-thiolactone in mice

Homocysteine (Hcy) and its metabolites Hcy-thiolactone, N-Hcy-protein, and S-Hcy-protein are implicated in vascular and neurological diseases. However, quantification of these metabolites remains challenging. Here I describe streamlined assays for these metabolites based on their conversion to Hcy-thiolactone. Free Hcy-thiolactone is extracted from the urine with chloroform/methanol. Total Hcy is converted to Hcy-thiolactone in the presence of 1 N HCl. Major urinary protein (MUP)-bound S-linked Hcy is liberated from the protein by reduction with dithiothreitol and converted to Hcy-thiolactone. Acid hydrolysis of MUP with 6 N HCl liberates N-linked Hcy as Hcy-thiolactone, which is then extracted with chloroform/methanol. Ferritin is used as an N-Hcy-protein standard and an authentic Hcy-thiolactone is used to monitor the efficiency of extraction. Hcy-thiolactone (free, derived from total Hcy, or from MUP-bound N-linked or S-linked Hcy) is separated by a cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography, post-column derivatized with o-phthaldialdehyde, and quantified by fluorescence. Using these assays with as little as 2–20 μL of urine I show that MUP carry N-linked and S-linked Hcy and that N-Hcy-MUP and S-Hcy-MUP and Hcy-thiolactone are severely elevated in cystathionine β-synthase-deficient mice. These assays will facilitate examination of the role of protein-related Hcy metabolites in health and disease.     

Effect of Terminal Aneuploidy on Epidermal Cell Viability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

In Drosophila melanogaster, individuals heterozygous for translocations between chromosomes Y and 3 can generate, by means of mitotic recombination, somatic cells bearing duplications and deletions. Using translocations with different breakpoints, I have studied the behavior of clones of cells with increasing degrees of aneuploidy in the abdominal cuticle. Both hyper- and hypoploid cells can survive being duplicated or deficient even for large chromosome 3 fragments. While hyperploidy does not severely affect cell viability, the recovery of hypoploid clones decreases linearly as a function of the size of the deleted fragment. In this report, the quantitative and qualitative aspects of this effect are discussed.     

Studies on the Ribosomal RNA Cistrons in Interspecific Drosophila Hybrids. II. Heterochromatic Regions Mediating Nucleolar Dominance

Interspecific hybrids of D. melanogaster and D. simulans normally exhibit a secondary constriction only at the D. melanogaster nucleolus organizer (NO). This phenomenon, termed nucleolar dominance, occurs only when the NO-bearing sex chromosomes of both species are present in conjunction. Experiments were initiated to localize regions on the sex chromosomes of D. melanogaster involved in mediating this suppression. Sex chromosome heterochromatic rearrangements and deficiencies were introduced into F₁ hybrids and their corresponding effect on simulans NO constriction formation was examined in hybrid mitotic neuroblast tissue. Sex chromosomes deficient for both the D. melanogaster NO and adjacent heterochromatin were unable to restrict the formation of a constriction at the D. simulans NO. The presence of a D. melanogaster NO, however, was not sufficient for the establishment of nucleolar dominance. Results from an array of NO-bearing X and Y chromosome rearrangements and deficiencies indicate that at least one heterochromatic region, proximal to the NO on the D. melanogaster X and distal to the NO on the D. melanogaster Y, affects the induction of this interchromosomal phenomenon.     

Cytological localization of ribosomal cistrons in polytene chromosomes of Phaseolus coccineus

Tritiated ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was prepared from hypocotyls of Phaseolus coccineus grown in liquid culture in the dark and in presence of 5-³H-uridine. A mixture of the 18S and 25S ³H-rRNA fractions was used for hybridization with DNA in the polytene chromosome cells of the embryo suspensor of P. coccineus. It was shown that the ribosomal cistrons (rDNA) are located in the nucleolus organizing system (satellite, nucleolar constriction and organizer) of the satellited chromosome pairs I (S₁) and V (S₂), in the proximal heterochromatic segment of the long arm of chromosomes S₁ and in the terminal heterochromatic segment of chromosome pair II. The micronucleoli which are produced by the satellite and nucleolus organizer of the chromosome pair S₁ contain rDNA; on the contrary, no rRNA-DNA hybridization is found in the DNA containing granules which are produced by the satellite and nucleolus organizer of chromosome pair S₂. The DNA which is amplified during production of DNA puffs at some chromosomal regions apparently does not code for ribosomal RNA (no detectable rRNA-DNA hybridization).Publication no. 62 from the Laboratorio di Mutagenesi e Differenziamento, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa. Part of the investigation was supported by Contract SC 001/076-69-1 BIAN between the European Atomic Energy Community and the University of Pisa, Institute of Genetics.     

Karyotypic conservatism in five species of Prochilodus (Characiformes,Prochilodontidae) disclosed by cytogenetic markers

The family Prochilodontidae is considered a group with well conserved chromosomes characterized by their number, morphology and banding patterns. Thence, our study aimed at accomplishing a cytogenetic analysis with conventional methods (Giemsa staining, silver staining of the nucleolus organizer regions-AgNOR, and C-banding) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S and 5S ribosomal DNA probes in five species of the Prochilodus genus (Prochilodus argenteus, Prochilodus brevis, Prochilodus costatus, Prochilodus lineatus and Prochilodus nigricans) collected from different Brazilian hydrographic basins. The results revealed conservatism in chromosome number, morphology, AgNORs 18S and 5S rDNAs location and constitutive heterochromatin distribution patterns. The minor differences observed in this work, such as an Ag-NOR on a P. argenteus chromosome and a distinct C-banding pattern in P. lineatus, are not sufficient to question the conservatism described for this group. Future work using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for FISH will be interesting to further test the cytogenetic conservatism in Prochilodus.     

The Location of the nucleolus organizer regions in Drosophila hydei

The positions of the nucleolus organizer regions in metaphase chromosomes of Drosophila hydei were detected by in situ hybridization experiments. In agreement with earlier conclusions the nucleolus of the X chromosome was found to originate in a terminal region of the heterochromatic arm. The Y chromosome contains two nucleolus organizers, one in a terminal position of the long arm, and the other in the short arm. The implications with respect to the evolution of the Y chromosome are discussed.