A new technique of scarless expanded forehead flap for reconstructive surgery

The forehead flap is an ideal flap for reconstructive surgery, especially for that involving reconstruction of the face and neck. However, it is usually limited to use in nasal reconstruction, even when performed in conjunction with tissue expansion, because of the severe visible morbidity of the donor site. In this article, the author discusses his development of a new technique of forehead flap, performed in conjunction with tissue expansion, for reconstructive surgery without visible scarring at the donor site. The technique involved positioning a tissue expander in the forehead pocket under the occipitofrontal muscle and serially inflating the expander over a period of approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Thereafter, an expanded forehead flap was created from the frontal hairline area on the basis of the location of the superficial temporal vessels and transferred into 16 recipient sites in 13 patients as an island flap (n = 8), a free flap (n = 1), or a local random flap (n = 7). The donor site was closed directly into the frontal hairline, without any visible scar. With the author's experience in the use of the island flap for nasal, facial, and neck reconstruction and of the free flap for reconstruction in the extremities, the flap could be as large as 8 x 18 cm without inducing flap necrosis or problems with donor-site closure. All patients (n = 13) had acceptable donor-site aesthetic results, without visible scarring. The results indicate that the flap could be a safe, ample, and color-matched flap for reconstruction of the face and neck and could also diminish donor-site morbidity to a minimum, without an unsightly visible scar. Furthermore, the flap could be formed into a customized free flap, with the above-mentioned advantages, to be transferred to any part of the body.     

A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap

Because of its ideal color and texture, forehead skin is acknowledged as the best donor site with which to resurface the nose. However, all forehead flaps, regardless of their vascular pedicles, are thicker than normal nasal skin. Stiff and flat, they do not easily mold from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional shape. Traditionally, the forehead is transferred in two stages. At the first stage, frontalis muscle and subcutaneous tissue are excised distally and the partially thinned flap is inset into the recipient site. At a second stage, 3 weeks later, the pedicle is divided. However, such soft-tissue "thinning" is limited, incomplete, and piecemeal. Flap necrosis and contour irregularities are especially common in smokers and in major nasal reconstructions. To overcome these problems, the technique of forehead flap transfer was modified. An extra operation was added between transfer and division.At the first stage, a full-thickness forehead flap is elevated with all its layers and is transposed without thinning except for the columellar inset. Primary cartilage grafts are placed if vascularized intranasal lining is present or restored. Importantly, at the first stage, skin grafts or a folded forehead flap can be used effectively for lining. A full-thickness skin graft will reliably survive when placed on a highly vascular bed. A full-thickness forehead flap can be folded to replace missing cover skin, with a distal extension, in continuity, to supply lining. At the second stage, 3 weeks later during an intermediate operation, the full-thickness forehead flap, now healed to its recipient bed, is physiologically delayed. Forehead skin with 3 to 4 mm of subcutaneous fat (nasal skin thickness) is elevated in the unscarred subcutaneous plane over the entire nasal inset, except for the columella. Skin grafts or folded flaps integrate into adjacent normal lining and can be completely separated from the overlying cover from which they were initially vascularized. If used, a folded forehead flap is incised free along the rim, completely separating the proximal cover flap from the distal lining extension. The underlying subcutaneous tissue, frontalis muscle, and any previously positioned cartilage grafts are now widely exposed, and excess soft tissue can be excised to carve an ideal subunit, rigid subsurface architecture. Previous primary cartilage grafts can be repositioned, sculpted, or augmented, if required. Delayed primary cartilage grafts can be placed to support lining created from a skin graft or a folded flap. The forehead cover skin (thin, supple, and conforming) is then replaced on the underlying rigid, recontoured, three-dimensional recipient bed. The pedicle is not transected. At a third stage, 3 weeks later (6 weeks after the initial transfer), the pedicle is divided.Over 10 years in 90 nasal reconstructions for partial and full-thickness defects, the three-stage forehead flap technique with an intermediate operation was used with primary and delayed primary grafts, and with intranasal lining flaps (n = 15), skin grafts (n = 11), folded forehead flaps (n = 3), turnover flaps (n = 5), prefabricated flaps (n = 4), and free flaps for lining (n = 2). Necrosis of the forehead flap did not occur. Late revisions were not required or were minor in partial defects. In full-thickness defects, a major revision and more than two minor revisions were performed in less than 5 percent of patients. Overall, the aesthetic results approached normal.The planned three-stage forehead flap technique of nasal repair with an intermediate operation (1) transfers subtle, conforming forehead skin of ideal thinness for cover, with little risk of necrosis; (2) uses primary and delayed primary grafts and permits modification of initial cartilage grafts to correct failures of design, malposition, or scar contraction before flap division; (3) creates an ideal, rigid subsurface framework of hard and soft tissue that is reflected through overlying skin and blends well into adjacent recipient tissues; (4) expands the application of lining techniques to include the use of skin grafts for lining at the first stage, or as a "salvage procedure" during the second stage, and also permits the aesthetic use of folded forehead flaps for lining; (5) ensures maximal blood supply and vascular safety to all nasal layers; (6) provides the surgeon with options to salvage reconstructive catastrophes; (7) improves the aesthetic result while decreasing the number and difficulty of revision operations and overall time for repair; and (8) emphasizes the interdependence of anatomy (cover, lining, and support) and provides insight into the nature of wound injury and repair in nasal reconstruction.     

Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap in children younger than 10 years of age

Nasal reconstruction has been analyzed extensively in adults but not in children. The purpose of this article is to review the authors' experience with the forehead flap for nasal reconstruction in 10 children under the age of 10 during a 10-year period. Outcomes were assessed by an objective grading system for cosmetic surgical results. Subjective criteria were also applied by an assistant surgeon and by the patients' relatives. Appropriate results were obtained by the following principles: (1) A modified approach that considers three subunits consisting of the dorsum, tip, and ala was used; (2) a forehead flap is the best option for an entire subunit or a full-thickness defect repair; (3) the forehead flap design should be paramedian, oblique, and opposite to the major defect to avoid the hairline and allow better caudal advancement; (4) ear or costal cartilages are good options for structural support (the septum is a nasal growth center that should not be touched); (5) infundibular undermining of vestibular mucosa, turnover flaps, and skin grafts are good options for internal lining; (6) reconstruction is a three-stage procedure (an intermediate operation is added to thin the flap and perform secondary revisions for lining and support); (7) reconstruction should be completed before the child is school aged, to achieve good aesthetic results immediately and avoid psychosocial repercussions; and (8) the reconstructed nose, with skin, lining, and support, will grow with the child (no final surgery should be planned at the age of 18, other than revisions of late complications).     

Repair of wide coup de sabre without cutaneous excision by means of pericranial-galeal padding flap

A case of double linear scleroderma of the forehead (coup de sabre) is described. The histopathology of this rare lesion is now well known with a normal epidermis and a sclerotic dermis. The correction was done with an original two-stage procedure: the lesion with alopecia was first treated by excision-suture and a transfer of the involved subcutaneous tissue along the right inner canthus; 1 year later, by a hemicoronal incision, we transferred a galeal-pericranial flap beneath the wider forehead lesion. We think that the use of a filling flap to correct wide coup de sabre lesions without cutaneous excision can be a simple alternative to the classic treatment by complete excision and flap reconstruction. The subcutaneous fascial system of the scalp can provide a good donor site with minimal morbidity.     

Nasal reconstruction based on aesthetic subunits in Orientals

Reconstruction based on the aesthetic subunit principle has yielded good aesthetic outcomes in patients with moderate to severe nasal defects caused by trauma or tumor resection. However, the topographic subunits previously proposed are often unsuitable for Orientals. Compared with the nose in white patients, the nose in Orientals is low, lacks nasal muscle, and has a flat glabella; the structural features of the underlying cartilage and bone are not distinctly reflected in outward appearance. The authors devised aesthetic subunits suitable for Orientals, and they used these units to reconstruct various parts of the nose. The major difference between these units and those presented previously is the lack of soft triangles and the addition of the glabella as an independent unit. The authors divided the nose into the following five topographic units: the glabella, the nasal dorsum, the nasal tip, and the two alae. The border of the nasal dorsum unit was extended to above the maxillonasal suture. The basic reconstruction techniques use a V-Y advancement flap from the forehead to reconstruct the glabella, an island flap from the forehead to reconstruct the nasal dorsum and nasal tip, a nasolabial flap to reconstruct an ala, and a malar flap to reconstruct the cheek. A combination of flaps was used when the defect involved more than one unit. This concept was used for nasal reconstruction in 24 patients. In one patient undergoing reconstruction of the nasal dorsum and in one undergoing reconstruction of the nasal tip, the texture of the forearm flap did not match well, which resulted in a slightly unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome. In one patient in whom the glabella, nasal dorsum, and part of the cheek were reconstructed simultaneously, a web was formed at the medial ocular angle, and a secondary operation was subsequently performed using Z-plasty. In one patient undergoing reconstruction with a forehead flap, defatting was required to reduce the bulk of the subcutaneous flap pedicle at the glabella. However, suture lines were placed in the most inconspicuous sites in all patients, and the use of a trapdoor contraction emphasized the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. The use of these aesthetic subunits for reconstruction offers several advantages, particularly in Oriental patients. Because the nasal dorsum is reconstructed together with the side walls, tenting of the nasal dorsum is avoided, which prevents a flat appearance of the nose. A forehead flap is useful in the repair of complex defects. Defects of the alae should be separately reconstructed with a nasolabial flap to enhance the effect of the trapdoor contraction and to highlight the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. Candidates for reconstruction should be selected on the basis of nasal structure. The results suggest that these units can also be used in some white patients.     

The radial forearm flap: reconstructive applications and donor-site defects in 35 consecutive patients

Thirty-five consecutive patients treated with the radial forearm flap were reviewed. This flap was used in head and neck reconstruction in 25 patients, soft-tissue cover of an extremity in 9 patients, and as a new technique for penile reconstruction in 1 patient. Osteocutaneous flaps were used for mandibular reconstruction in 13 patients. In 6 patients innervated flaps were used to provide sensation on the dorsum of the hand or on the weight-bearing surface of the foot. There was only one total flap failure and no partial failures. Recipient-site complications were few, with prompt healing and very acceptable appearance. Donor-site complications included partial loss of the skin graft with tendon exposure in 10 patients (33 percent), an unsatisfactory appearance in 5 patients (17 percent), and one case of radial fracture (8 percent). On functional testing, there was no significant loss of strength or joint mobility in the donor extremity in 19/20 patients. The authors recommend measures to reduce donor-site morbidity and conclude that, with an acceptable donor site, this flap is valuable in a variety of reconstructive applications.     

Reverse anterior tibial artery flap for reconstruction of foot donor site

The foot offers numerous useful options for hand reconstruction. Hallux transfer, dorsalis pedis flap, second toe transfers, and toe joint transfers offer good functional results in reconstructed hands. However, when the donor site is repaired with skin grafts, delayed wound healing, scarring, and contractures often result. Poor cosmesis of the donor site and altered gait are the main drawbacks of the procedures. The authors propose a new concept of primary reconstruction of the donor foot using a reverse-flow anterior tibial flap from the same leg. Two flaps are raised from the same anterior tibial vessel system in continuity as a distal free flap for hand reconstruction and as a proximal reverse-flow pedicled flap to resurface the donor defect. This technique allows good flap reconstruction of the foot donor site, reducing morbidity and limiting the operation to the same limb. The authors report their experience of 33 cases. There were no failures. Primary wound healing was achieved in the foot donor site, with acceptable cosmesis and satisfactory function.     

Frontalis musculocutaneous island flap for coverage of forehead defect

The use of the frontalis musculocutaneous flap as a pedicle island flap offers some advantages in frontal reconstruction. It can be used for immediate reconstruction following the ablation of a small or moderate area, even after harvesting of the frontal flap for nasal reconstruction. Because of its intact lateral bundle, it has the potential to carry some sensory innervation, albeit minimal, to the reconstructed area. We have found the frontalis musculocutaneous flap, when used as a pedicle island flap, to be an adaptable and dependable alternative flap for repairs after small or moderate resections in the frontal region. This flap could be performed immediately and in one stage, have a low morbidity rate, and allow a rapid aesthetic restoration; and, it is easy to perform. In two cases, we have observed some degree of venous congestion in the island during the early postoperative period but with success in final healing. The experience demonstrates that this flap should be considered as another valuable tool in reconstructive efforts directed at the forehead. We propose a novel method for the forehead reconstruction using the frontalis musculocutaneous island flap. A case is presented that demonstrates the use of this flap for repair in a depressed frontal defect.     

Case report: Reconstruction of the mid-face in an adult, after gangrenous destruction in infancy.

We report a case of an adult mid-face reconstruction for a deformity occurring in infancy, using a Le Fort III advancement first to restore the contour of the skeleton. This was followed by a scalping forehead flap for the nasal reconstruction, and a fleur-de-lis Abbe flap for reconstruction of the lip and nasal vestibule.     

Eyelids and eye socket reconstruction using the expanded forehead flap and scapha composite grafting.

After trauma or excision of malignant tumor, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory results when reconstructing deformed eyelids and the socket for an ocular prosthesis. The authors demonstrate examples of successful reconstruction for a prosthetic eye that provided adequate and aesthetic soft-tissue support achieved by applying a three-step surgical procedure of reconstruction of the eye socket, the eyelids, and the tarsus and eyelid margin. Because it is highly vascularized and its distal end can be divided into two or three portions for easy three-dimensional reconstruction, the expanded forehead flap alone, with a galea flap, or with a free rectus abdominis muscle perforator flap was used. The expanded forehead flap also provides excellent thin upper lid contour and good color-matching with a recipient site. For the eye socket, sufficient volume of tissue was provided from the expanded forehead flap with or without a galea or a free rectus abdominis muscle perforator flap, and a deep and convex fornix was formed. This resulted in a good fit and in stability of the ocular prosthesis. The surface and the inner lining of the eyelids were reconstructed using portions of the expanded forehead flap. For the tarsus and eyelid margin, conventional reconstruction techniques use cartilage of the concha, which has limitations of length and which does not fit the shape of the tarsal margin. The authors used the scapha composite graft, and a natural shape and good elasticity resulted.     

Nasal reconstruction--beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases

A retrospective analysis was performed on 1334 patients who underwent nasal reconstruction between 1986 and 2001. The senior author performed all reconstructions in this series after Mohs' histographic excisions. Only secondary reconstructions were performed without a preceding Mohs' excision. Methods of reconstruction, number of operations per patient, locations of defects, and complications were recorded. Using preoperative and postoperative photographs, aesthetic results were reviewed. Basal cell carcinoma was the most common lesion, followed by squamous cancer and melanoma. The average age of the patients was 51 years. Cancers most commonly arose on the dorsum, ala, and tip. Of 1334 cases, a 1.9 percent recurrence rate was documented. The average time between surgery and clinical recognition of recurrence was 39 months. All recurrent lesions were reexcised by the Mohs' technique. Eighty-one percent of reconstructions were completed in three or fewer stages. Seventy-five percent of reconstructions were completed in two stages. Primary dermabrasion or primary laserbrasion using carbon dioxide or erbium lasers was used in nearly every case. Early secondary dermabrasion or laserbrasion was used in a few cases where indicated. A 1.2 percent revision rate was noted (16 patients). Thirteen partial flap necroses required revision. Three patients experienced dehiscence at the donor site of paramedian forehead flaps. A preferred philosophy toward nasal reconstruction is described. The goal is to achieve optimal cosmetic and functional results while minimizing stages and resection of healthy tissue. Six core principles are advocated that guide efficient and successful nasal reconstruction: (1) maximal conservation of native tissue is advised; (2) reconstruction of the defect, not the subunit, is advised; (3) complementary ablative procedures, such as primary dermabrasion, enhance the final result and decrease the number of revisionary procedures; (4) primary defatting also decreases the number of revisionary procedures; (5) when possible, the use of axial pattern flaps is preferred; and (6) good contour is the aesthetic endpoint.     

A new twist to the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of lateral alar defects

The nasolabial flap remains the favored technique for alar and lateral nasal reconstruction. Results with currently popular techniques tend to be inartistic and aesthetically disappointing. Improved results can be achieved, however, by a technique using a medially based nasolabial turnover flap for lining with a distal extension providing the cover. Reconstruction of the ala begins by designing a nasolabial flap with its base as close as possible to the site of the proposed ala. The flap is incised to the required margins, carrying 2 to 3 mm of underlying fat; then, hinged on its base, the flap is flipped over medially like the page of a book. As the proximal flap is sutured to the lining side of the defect, the distal flap gracefully twists 90 degrees and is then folded on itself to form the external surface of the ala. The donor site is closed primarily. With this procedure, a natural-appearing and appropriately positioned ala may be reconstructed in one step, although a second procedure may be helpful to sculpture the margin or precisely position the alar base.     

Reappraisal of island modifications of lateral calcaneal artery skin flap

Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the calcaneal region and the heel is very demanding and necessitates, as a rule, a sensate and thin flap. The ideal characteristics of a sensate and thin layer of flap should be combined with a reliable blood supply and minimal morbidity at the donor site. The authors report an updated review of their experience with the use of island modifications of the lateral calcaneal artery skin flap-the lateral calcaneal island flap, the lateral calcaneal V-Y advancement flap, and the bilobed-shaped lateral calcaneal island advancement flap-for the reconstruction of small and medium-sized tissue defects over the exposed calcaneal tendons and calcaneal bones of 18 patients. All of the procedures were performed under spinal or epidural anesthesia. There were no problems associated with flap viability, but the authors have seen necrosis of undermined skin between the lateral malleolus and calcaneal tendon in two cases and a partial loss of skin graft in one case. In this article, the authors discuss some advantages and disadvantages of the use of a lateral calcaneal island flap and its modifications.     

Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity

The radial forearm flap is commonly used for reconstruction of tongue defects following tumor extirpation. This flap is easy to harvest and offers thin tissue with large-caliber vessels. However, its use leaves behind a conspicuous aesthetic deformity in the forearm and requires the sacrifice of a major artery of that limb, the radial artery. The anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap has found clinical applications in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects requiring thin tissue. More recently, in a thinned form, the anterolateral thigh flap has been used for reconstructing defects of the tongue with functional results equivalent to that of the radial forearm flap. For the reconstruction of tongue defects, these two flaps could provide similar soft-tissue coverage, but they seem to result in different donor-site appearances. The donor site is closed primarily, leaving only a linear scar that is inconspicuous with normal clothing, and no functional deficit is left behind in the thigh. Thus, for the supply of flaps for tongue defects, a comparison between the radial forearm flap and the anterolateral thigh flap donor sites is provided in this study. Between December of 2000 and August of 2002, 41 patients who underwent reconstruction of defects of the tongue using either a radial forearm flap or an anterolateral thigh flap were evaluated. The focus was on the evaluation of the functional and aesthetic outcome of the donor site after harvesting these flaps for the purpose of reconstructing either total or partial tongue defects. Finally, a comparison was performed between the donor sites of the two flaps. The disadvantages of the radial forearm flap include the conspicuous unattractive scar in the forearm region, pain, numbness, and the sacrifice of a major artery of the limb. In some patients, the donor-site scar of the forearm acted as a social stigma, preventing these patients from leading a normal life. In contrast, the anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap, after thinning, achieved the same results in reconstructing defects of the tongue without the associated donor-site morbidity. Most importantly, the donor site in the thigh could be closed primarily in almost all patients without any functional deficit. The thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap is a viable substitute for the radial forearm flap when reconstructing defects of the tongue. The results achieved are similar to those of the radial forearm flap, and the donor-site morbidity is significantly decreased.     

The gluteal-fold flap for vulvar and buttock reconstruction: anatomic study and adjustment of flap volume.

The ideal skin-flap reconstruction provides functional preservation and a good cosmetic outcome in both the reconstructed site and the donor site. Although various flaps are used for reconstruction of the vulvar and buttock region, there are disadvantages associated with each. In 1996, Yii and Niranjan reported the gluteal-fold flap for vulvar reconstruction. As presently used, this flap is bulky, particularly in obese patients or when used for hemilateral reconstruction. Thinning the flap has been considered impossible because of the obscurity of the blood supply. In the study presented here, the pedicle vessels of this flap were studied in eight cadavers; the authors found that the flap is nourished by a direct cutaneous system of the internal pudendal artery and vein. Accordingly, adjustment of the flap volume was believed to be possible, with the exception of the adipose tissue containing the pedicle vessels. The authors have since used 14 thinned flaps for seven vulvar, one vaginal, and two buttock defects in 10 patients. All flaps survived completely. Good functional and cosmetic results were achieved with hemilateral or bilateral flaps in vulvar or buttock reconstruction. In the buttock in particular, the usefulness of this flap for anal and pelvic-floor reconstruction was demonstrated. The scar at the donor site, concealed in the gluteal fold, was acceptable. The gluteal-fold flap is very useful for various vulvar and buttock reconstructions because it can be adjusted to the required volume.     

Reconstruction of proximal nasal defects with island composite nasal flaps

There are few local nasal flap options for repair of proximal nasal defects. Absence of suitable donor sites and the large dimensions of the defects limit the use of local nasal flaps in this region. Regional paranasal flaps may not be suitable in these cases because of color, texture, and donor-site scars. The composite procerus muscle and nasal skin flap, which is vascularized by the dorsal nasal branch of the angular artery, can be a useful treatment modality for proximal nasal reconstruction. Seven patients were successfully treated using the composite nasal flaps. The maximal size of the defects was 2.4 cm. In one case, the composite nasal flap was readvanced to close a new defect resulting from reexcision. The composite nasal flap has several advantages in reconstruction of proximal nasal defects. Reconstruction is performed with the same tissue and the donor defect is closed primarily. The composite nasal flap can be moved in multiple directions and has great mobility to reach every point of the proximal part of the nose with axial blood supply. Furthermore, it can be easily readvanced without additional morbidity in case of reexcision.     

Prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap combined with a submental flap in noma surgery

The authors report their experience with a new procedure: the combination of a prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap and a submental flap performed in an African hospital on five patients with cheek deformities caused by noma. The prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap makes the inner lining of the cheek, which is anchored on the peripheral scar tissue. The submental flap is released during the second operation and makes the outer lining. The main advantages are the excellent aesthetic color of this last flap and the short distance between the donor site and the recipient site. Moreover, the submental flap is positioned in a single operation (when the outer-lining reconstruction is performed with a deltopectoralis flap, a third operation is necessary to cut the pedicle). None of the flaps failed, and the functional results were good. The prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap and submental flap are versatile and reliable flaps, with reasonably long vascular pedicles, that can be used successfully, even under suboptimal conditions in weak patients with huge defects of the face.     

The extended V-Y flap.

The extended V-Y flap is a modification of the V-Y advancement flap, which is very useful in closing defects following excision of facial lesions. The modification involves the addition of an extension limb onto the advancing edge of the standard flap. This limb is located adjacent to the area requiring reconstruction and is hinged down as a transposition flap on the end of the V-Y advancement flap to close the most distal portion of the defect. The extended V-Y flap has been found to be very effective in closing large defects in areas that typically have inadequate subcutaneous tissue to allow extensive mobilization of the standard V-Y advancement flap. It has been used effectively with excellent cosmetic results in the temporal, scalp, forehead, and nasal areas, providing a well-contoured and aesthetically pleasing reconstruction.     

Vaginal and pelvic reconstruction with distally based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps

This report introduces a new method of vaginal reconstruction using a single rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap based distally. Applications of this flap in reconstruction of major abdominal wall and pelvic defects, such as hemipelvectomies, are also described. The flap is designed to carry a paddle of upper abdominal skin on a distally based muscle and vascular pedicle. Advantages of this flap design are (1) the technique is straightforward and rapid, (2) flap viability is reliable, (3) the epigastric skin-fascial donor defect preserves the anterior rectus fascia distal to the linea semicircularis, which prevents hernia, (4) a large arc of rotation is provided, and (5) the epigastric donor site does not interfere with colostomy and urinary conduit stomas in the pelvic exenteration patient. We have done 11 vaginal reconstructions and 9 major pelvic defect reconstructions with this flap during the last 3 1/2 years. In these 20 patients, the only complications were two partial flap losses. No major flap losses or ventral hernias occurred.     

The dorsalis pedis free flap: technique of elevation, foot closure, and flap application

The dorsalis pedis free flap is an excellent reconstructive tool for thin remote mucosal defects, for heel and hand defects where innervation is critical, and as an osteocutaneous flap with unique application to mandibular and floor of mouth reconstruction. The major criticism with this flap is related to its uncertain vascularity and the donor defect. We have found in our series of 45 cases that the vascular anatomy is exceedingly reliable. Problems with the donor defects are all related to technique. With care in flap elevation and foot closure, which we describe in detail, an acceptable donor site with minimal complications can be achieved. The clinical applications of this flap are illustrated by three case reports. Our experience with the donor site has not been problem-free. However, we do believe that with meticulous technique primary healing will occur without functional disability and with minimal cosmetic deformity.