生长激素促释放剂受体配体的研究进展

生长激素促释放剂是一种合成的小分子化合物,它通过生长激素促释放剂受体而起作用,该受体是一种新的G蛋白偶联受体。以前曾认为生长激素促释放剂受体是一种孤儿受体,直到近年来从人和鼠的胃中鉴定到Ghrelin的存在,而改变了这种看法。Ghrelin是包含28个氨基酸残基的肽,在3号位的丝氨酸位点有辛酰化基团。该肽是在X／A样细胞分泌颗粒中发现的,Ghrelin的发现表明促垂体分泌生长激素可能不止受到来自下丘脑的生长激素释放激素的调节,同时还可能受到来自胃和下丘脑的Ghrelin的调节。     

Ghrelin与疼痛研究进展

Ghrelin为1999年从大鼠胃粘膜及下丘脑中发现的一种生长激素促分泌素受体(growth hor-mone secretagogue receptor,GHS-Rs)的天然配体,由28个氨基酸残基组成。Ghrelin广泛分布于机体的多个组织器官,如下丘脑、垂体、胃肠道、胰腺、心脏、性腺等。Ghrelin与其受体结合后,具有促进生长激素的释放、增加摄食、刺激胃蠕动和胃酸分泌,改善心血管等多种生物学作用。近年来有研究表明,Ghrelin在中枢神经系统具有广泛分布,并且具有镇痛作用,其主要通过调节与疼痛有关的系统和抑制促炎细胞因子的分泌进而缓解疼痛。现将Ghrelin在疼痛方面的研究做一综述。     

Ghrelin:一种新发现的生长激素释放肽

Ghrelin是一种新发现的含有28个氨基酸的生长激素释放肽,为生长激素促分泌素受体(growthhormonesecretagoguereceptor,GHSR)的内源性配体。当Ghrelin与其特异性受体(GHSR)结合后会产生一系列生物学效应。Ghrelin具有刺激垂体前叶释放生长激素、增加食欲、调节能量代谢平衡,以及促进胃酸分泌等生物学功能,其作用机制目前尚不清楚。     

唾液腺能够产生Ghrelin

Ghrelin是最初在胃内分泌细胞中发现的脑肠肽,是生长激素促分泌受体（GHS-R）的内源性配体。近年来的研究证明,除胃肠道外,两栖类动物的下丘脑、心脏、胰腺、肺、胎盘都能产生ghrelin。Ghrelin由28个氨基酸组成,其N端第3位n-辛酰化的丝氨酸是ghrelin与其受体结合并发挥生物学活性的关键部位。Ghrelin主要的生理功能是促进生长激素释放,促进摄食和调节能量代谢。Ghrelin可以作用于胃肠道,     

鱼类生长激素合成与分泌的内分泌调控网络:垂体生长激素分泌细胞中的信号整合

在硬骨鱼类,生长激素的合成是由从下丘脑分泌的神经内分泌因子和由垂体及其他外周器官分泌的调节因子来调控的.从细胞水平上阐明这些调控因子在脑垂体的生长激素分泌细胞中的信号分化和整合机制,对于更好地了解鱼类生长激素的合成与分泌的内分泌调控网络有重要意义.本文综述了GH调节因子作用机制研究的新进展,包括神经内分泌因子,垂体及外周水平的调控因子,主要侧重于它们的受体系统及受体后的信号转导通路.     

Ghrelin与生殖系统研究进展

Ghrelin是1999年发现的生长激素促分泌素受体(growth hormone secretagogue receptor,GHS-R)的天然配体,由28个氨基酸残基组成.除具有促进生长激素的释放、增加摄食、刺激胃蠕动和胃酸分泌,尚有其它许多功能.近年来发现Ghrelin及其受体在生殖系统也广泛分布,提示Ghrelin对生殖系统也具有重要的调节作用,进一步的研究发现Ghrelin具有调节生殖激素黄体生成素、催乳素、雌二醇和孕酮的分泌,促进颗粒细胞的增殖等作用.本文就Ghrelin在生殖系统的研究进展做如下综述.     

新近发现的一种调节肽——生长素

生长素（ghrelin）是一种新发现的含有28个氨基酸的多肽,1999年日本科学家Kojima最先在小鼠和人胃内分泌细胞中发现。最近又在人的下丘脑和脑干发现一种孤立的G蛋白偶联受体-促生长激素分泌受体（GHS-Rs),是其特异性受体,当生长素与其特异性受体结合后会产生一系列生物学效应,如刺激垂体前叶释放生长激素,增加食欲,调节能量平衡,促进胃酸分泌,抗生长素免疫球蛋白G可明显抑制食欲,神经肽Y（NPY）及刺鼠肽基因相关蛋白（AGRP）的抗体或拮抗剂可阻断生长素的增食欲作用,生长素可使NPY基因表达增高并阻断瘦素引起的降低食欲作用,禁食,低血糖和瘦素能使生长素在胃内表达上调,它可能是生长激素/胰岛素样生长因子-1轴和调节能量平衡的神经内分泌调节之间的一个新的联结纽带,与肥胖等密切相关。     

Ghrelin与内分泌代谢异常

Ghrelin是近年来新发现的一种小分子活性肽, 主要由胃底的X/A 样细胞分泌,是生长激素促分泌物受体(GHS-R)的内源性配体.Ghrelin及其受体也可表达于肠道、胰腺、肾脏、性腺、胎盘、甲状腺、肾上腺、下丘脑、垂体等多种内分泌组织或器官.研究表明,ghrelin与糖代谢、甲状腺疾病、肥胖、多囊卵巢综合征等多种内分泌代谢疾患有关.本文将就ghrelin与内分泌代谢异常的关系的研究进展作简要介绍.     

Ghrelin和脑功能

Ghrelin是首先从大鼠胃粘膜发现的一种新的脑-肠肽激素,具有促进生长激素释放的作用。它经辛酰化修饰具有生物学活性后可以通过血脑屏障发挥作用。研究发现,Ghrelin及其受体在脑组织(如下丘脑、大脑皮质、脑干、海马等)分布较广泛。近几年来,人们对Ghrelin和脑功能的研究也越来越多。本文就Ghrelin在学习和记忆、睡眠、焦虑、应激及神经保护等脑功能中所发挥的作用作一综述。     

生长激素分泌促进剂及构效关系研究进展

生长激素分泌促进剂是一类作用于垂体和下丘脑的具有专一性促生长激素释放作用的寡肽及其类似物.由于其分子质量小、活性高、可口服、作用专一而有可能成为新的生长激素治疗药物.目前已经发展了很多具有此类活性的多种结构的化合物,如肽、环肽、肽醇及非肽类似物等.尽管这类化合物的作用机制尚未完全明确,但已有证据表明存在新的调节生长激素分泌的途径和新的调节因子.     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor