Review of endovascular brachytherapy physics for prevention of restenosis

Intraluminal irradiation of coronary and peripheral arteries has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia following balloon angioplasty, thereby inhibiting restenosis. Several irradiation techniques are being investigated, including temporary intravascular insertion of high activity gamma- or beta-emitting seeds and wires; inflation of dilatation balloon catheter with radioactive liquid or gas; insertion of miniature x-ray tubes via coronary catheters; permanent implantation of radioactive stents; and postangioplasty fractionated external beam irradiation. Unlike conventional brachytherapy, intravascular treatment of restenosis requires accurate knowledge of dose at distances of 0.5-5 mm from the radioactive source. This requirement presents special problems with regard to source calibration and dose specification, because dose gradients at such close distances from a radioactive source are extremely large. This makes it virtually impossible to define the characteristics of an ideal radiation source without some knowledge of the location and radiosensitivity of the target tissues, plus the radiotolerance of normal tissues. Hence, the current debate over whether beta or gamma sources are to be preferred. Imprecise knowledge of dose-volume effects for coronary arteries, plus uncertainties in the biological time sequencing of restenosis fuel a second debate on whether external beam treatments may be efficacious, and whether or not permanent radioactive stents may prove superior to high dose, single fraction brachytherapy. We review here the dosimetric properties of the various irradiation techniques and isotopes that have been proposed, including aspects of radiation safety, dose homogeneity, and practical aspects of source delivery.     

Clinical trials of vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis: update

Vascular brachytherapy has become the therapeutic strategy of choice for in-stent restenosis. Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety of this technology have enrolled nearly 4000 patients using both gamma and beta emitters. At present, ongoing controversies include optimal dosimetry, whether beta emitters are as effective as gamma and whether centering delivery systems perform better than non-centering systems. Complications of brachytherapy such as edge effect, late thrombosis and late restenosis have received increasing attention. This review provides an update of the current status of clinical trials utilizing vascular brachytherapy to prevent the recurrence of in-stent restenosis.     

Endovascular brachytherapy in coronary arteries: the Rotterdam experience

Purpose: The use of endovascular coronary brachytherapy to prevent restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) began in April 1997 at the Department of Interventional Cardiology of the Thoraxcenter at the University Hospital of Rotterdam. This article reviews the more than 250 patients that have been treated so far.Methods and Materials: The Beta-Cath System (Novoste), a manual, hydraulic afterloader with 12 90Sr seeds, was used in the Beta Energy Restenosis Trial (BERT-1.5, n=31), for compassionate use (n=25), in the Beta-Cath System trial (n=27) and in the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE, n=14). Since the Beta-Cath System has been commercialized in Europe, 57 patients have been treated and registered in RENO (Registry Novoste). In the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT), 37 patients were randomized using the Guidant-Nucletron remote control afterloader with a 32P source wire and a centering catheter. Radioactive 32P coated stents have been implanted in 102 patients. In the Isostent Restenosis Intervention Study 1 (IRIS 1), 26 patients received a stent with an activity of 0.75-1.5 μCi, and in the IRIS 2 (European 32P dose response trial), 40 patients were treated with an activity of 6-12 μCi. In two consecutive pilot trials, radioactive stents with non-radioactive ends (cold-end stents) and with ends containing higher levels of activity (hot-end stents) were implanted in 21 and 17 patients, respectively.Results: In the BERT-1.5 trial, the radiation dose, prescribed at 2 mm from the source train (non-centered), was 12 Gy (10 patients), 14 Gy (10 patients) and 16 Gy (11 patients). At 6-month follow-up, 8 out of 28 (29%) patients developed restenosis. The target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7 out of 30 (23%) at 6 months and 8 out of 30 (27%) at 1 year. Two patients presented with late thrombosis in the first year. For compassionate use patients, a restenosis rate (RR) of 53% was observed. In the PREVENT trial, 34 of 37 patients underwent an angiographic 6-month follow-up. The doses prescribed at 0.5 mm depth into the vessel wall were 0 Gy (8), 28 Gy (9), 35 Gy (11) and 42 Gy (8). TLR was 14% in the irradiated patients and 25% in the placebo group. One patient developed late thrombosis. In the IRIS 1 trial, 23 patients showed an RR of 17% (in-stent). In the IRIS 2 trial, in-stent restenosis was not seen in 36 patients at 6-month follow-up. However, a high RR (44%) was observed at the stent edges.Conclusions: The integration of vascular brachytherapy in the catheterization laboratory is feasible and the different treatment techniques that are used are safe. Problems, such as edge restenosis and late thrombotic occlusion, have been identified as limiting factors of this technique. Solutions have been suggested and will be tested in future trials.     

Endovascular brachytherapy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Purpose: To evaluate the technical feasibility and efficacy of endovascular brachytherapy with Iridium-192 in the prevention of restenosis caused by neointimal hyperplasia of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).Materials and Methods: The endovascular brachytherapy with high dose rate automatic afterloading system was performed in six patients with recurrent of stenosis of TIPS. We used a single dose fraction of 12 Gy delivered at 3 millimeter (mm) from the source axis to the stenotic vessel segment in five patients with spiral Z-stent, and 15 Gy at 5 mm in one patient with Wallstent.Results: Follow-up time ranged from 148 to 639 days. In one patient, restenosis occurred in the treated vessel segment, diagnosed 71 days after endovascular brachytherapy by doppler ultrasound. All other patients were, during the follow-up time, without restenosis in the irradiated vessel segment. Radiation-associated side effects were not observed.Conclusions: Endovascular brachytherapy of TIPS is technically feasible and may be done as a part of the percutaneous revision of the shunt. This pilot study may be the largest experience of treating TIPS restenosis in humans to date. For definitive conclusions, a lot of studies are needed.     

Intravascular brachytherapy to prevent restenosis: dosimetric considerations.

Acute myocardial infarction is often the result of occlusion of one or more coronary arteries. Occlusion and restenosis (re-closing of the vessel) are principal reasons that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may fail to provide long-term benefit. PTCA has been a popular treatment, which is less invasive than surgeries involving revascularization of the myocardium, promising a better quality of life for patients. Unfortunately, the rate of restenosis after balloon angioplasty is high (approximately 30-50% in the first year after treatment). Recent data suggest that intraluminal irradiation of coronary arteries in conjunction with balloon angioplasty and/or stent implantation reduces the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and neointima formation, thereby inhibiting restenosis. In order to study radiation dosimetry in the patient and for this therapy, dose distributions for electrons and photons, with discrete energies, were simulated for blood vessels of diameter 1.5, 3 and 4.5 mm irradiated with balloon and wire sources. Electron and photon transport was performed in a simple model representing the system used for irradiation using the MCNP 4B code (Monte Carlo N-Particles). Specific calculations for balloon and wire sources were also carried out for a few radionuclides. In this work, strengths and drawbacks conceming the use of each radionuclide simulated, as well as source geometries are discussed. The dosimetry performed in this study will improve understanding of the benefit-to-risk ratio in intracoronary brachytherapy.     

The role of intravascular ultrasound imaging in vascular brachytherapy

Intracoronary brachytherapy has recently emerged as a new therapy to prevent restenosis. Initial experimental work was achieved in animal models and the results were assessed by histomorphometry. Initial clinical trials used angiography to guide dosimetry and to assess efficacy. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) permits tomographic examination of the vessel wall, elucidating the true morphology of the lumen and transmural components, which cannot be investigated on the lumenogram obtained by angiography. This paper reviews the use of IVUS in the clinical studies of brachytherapy conducted to date. IVUS allows clinicians to make a thorough assessment of the remodeling of the vessel and appears to have a major role to play in facilitating understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action in this emerging field. The authors propose that state-of-the-art IVUS techniques should be employed to further knowledge of the mechanisms of action of brachytherapy in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries.