Genital human papillomavirus testing by in situ hybridization in liquid atypical cytologic materials and follow-up biopsies

OBJECTIVE: To describe cases of HPV testing by DNA in situ hybridization performed on atypical cervicovaginal samples collected by a liquidsed method that were negative for HPV DNA on cytology but revealed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on follow-up biopsies. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred ninety-five consecutive SurePath atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytologic samples from asymptomatic, reproductive-age women were tested for human papillomaviruses (HPVs) by the in situ hybridization (ISH) method (Ventana Inform HPV Test, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A). One hundred (25%) cases underwent follow-up colposcopic biopsy within 3 months of cytology. All the tests (cytology, ISH, histology) were independently evaluated without knowledge of the other tests. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two (33%) cytologic samples were positive for HPVs. Of a total of 100 (HPV positive and negative) follow-up biopsies, 55 were positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Fourteen cases of biopsy-proven CIN tested negative for all HPV types in the prior cytologic samples. Retesting of the 14 CIN tissues by ISH was negative in 10, positive for HPV in 2 and inconclusive in 2. CONCLUSION: There is a small but significant (14%) false negative rate with HPV testing by the Ventana ISH method. Clinically suspicious cases should be followed even if an HPV test is negative.     

Detection of HPV DNA in cervical specimens collected in cytologic solution by ligation-dependent PCR

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and sensitivity of detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) in specimens collected in Cytyc PreservCyt fluid (Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) using ligation-dependent polymerase chain reaction (LD-PCR) and to demonstrate the diagnostic value of HPV DNA testing as an adjunct to cytology in the detection of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), especially in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). STUDY DESIGN: LD-PCR is a recently invented DNA amplification technology that utilizes a capture probe for target isolation and 2 hemiprobes for target detection. The hemiprobes are designed in such a way that when they hybridize to their target, the 5' end of one probe and the 3' end of the other probe are brought together. Two hemiprobes can then be ligated into a full probe that can serve as a template for PCR amplification. A total of 94 cervical specimens were collected in cytologic fluid and tested with LD-PCR. The results were compared with those of the Digene Hybrid Capture II assay (HC II) (Beltville, Maryland, U.S.A.) and consensus PCR. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for detecting HPV was 41.5% (39/94) by LD-PCR, 50% (47/94) by consensus PCR and 37.2% (35/94) by HC II. The prevalence of HPV by HC II, consensus PCR and LD-PCR were 87.5%, 100% and 87.5% in the high grade SIL group; 100%, 90.9% and 90.9% in the low grade SIL group; 30%, 52.5% and 40% in the ASCUS group; and 14.2%, 22.8% and 17.1% in women with normal cytology. These results indicate that all 3 methods have similar sensitivity in patients with SIL. However, there is greater variation in detection rates in the ASCUS and normal cytology groups. CONCLUSION: LD-PCR is a useful method of detecting HPV in liquid-based gynecologic cytologic preservatives, and HPV testing as a method adjunct to the liquid-based Pap test could be useful in detecting SILs, especially for the management of patients with ASCUS.     

High-Grade Cervical Lesions Among Women Attending A Reference Clinic In Brazil: Associated Factors And Comparison Among Screening Methods

Background

Although screening for cervical cancer is recommended for women in most countries, the incidence of cervical cancer is greater in developing countries. Our goal was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with high-grade lesions/cervical cancer among women attending a reference clinic in Brazil and evaluate the correlation of histology with cytology, colposcopy and the high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) tests.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of women attending a colposcopy clinic was carried out. The patients were interviewed to collect demographic, epidemiological and clinical data. Specimens were collected for cervical cytology, Chlamydia trachomatis and HPV testing using the Hybrid Capture (HC) and PCR tests. Colposcopy was performed for all patients and biopsy for histology when cell abnormalities or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were present.

Results

A total of 291 women participated in the study. The median age was 38 years (DIQ: 30–48 years). The prevalence of histologically confirmed high-grade lesions/cervical cancer was 18.2% (95%, CI: 13.8%–22.6%), with 48 (16.5%) cases of CIN-2/CIN-3 and 5 (1.7%) cases of invasive carcinoma. In the final logistic regression model, for ages between 30 and 49 years old [OR = 4.4 (95%: 1.01–19.04), history of smoking [OR = 2.4 (95%, CI: 1.14–5.18)], practice of anal intercourse [OR = 2.4 (95%, CI: 1.10–5.03)] and having positive HC test for HR-HPV [OR = 11.23 (95%, CI: 4 0.79–26, 36)] remained independently associated with high-grade lesions/cervical cancer. A total of 64.7% of the cases CIN-3\Ca in situ were related to HPV-16. Non-oncogenic HPV were only found in CIN-1 biopsy results. Compared to histology, the sensitivity of cytology was 31.8%, the specificity 95.5%; the sensitivity of colposcopy for high-grade lesions/cervical cancer was 51.0%, specificity was 91.4% and the concordance with HPV testing was high.

Conclusions

The results confirm an association of HR-HPV with precursor lesions for cervical cancer. These data emphasize that cytological screening to detect precursor lesions is still important in some regions and that HR-HPV should be included for screening.     

Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively study the HPV DNA assay of residual samples from the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) PreserveCyt (Cytyc) vial as a quality improvement (QI) indicator for management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Six hundred eight residual sample vials of liquid-based Pap-Test specimens were selected for the study based on Pap-test results from October 1998 to March 2001. The specimen vials were forwarded to the reference laboratory (American Medical Laboratories, Chantilly, Virginia, U.S.A.) for HPV DNA assay using the Hybrid Capture System method (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.). At the time of HPV DNA assay, the residual samples were between 8 days to 10 months old, and each vial contained 4 mL. Of the 608 study cases, 76 were WNL, 115 contained BCC, 172 contained ASCUS, 179 were LSIL and 66 were HSIL. In this study, the 191 WNL and BCC cases were designated as the disease-free control group. The HPV DNA typing results were reported as low-risk, high/intermediate-risk or HPV DNA "not detected" HPV types. The HPV DNA testing results were compared to the Pap-Test diagnoses and statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: The following information reflects the percentage of HPV DNA-positive cases based on the Pap-Test diagnoses: 16.2% in WNL and BCC, 51.1% in ASCUS, 94.4% in LSIL and 98.4% in HSIL. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%), false negative value (4.4%), false positive value (16.2%) and predictive value of a positive (88.3%) and negative (93.5%) Pap-Test were calculated on the basis of HPV DNA testing results for 436 cases that were diagnosed as either SIL or negative (WNL and BCC). ASCUS (172) Pap-Test cases were considered borderline--disease positive and excluded from statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: The HPV DNA assay of residual samples from ThinPrep Pap-Test liquid-based specimens is an objective adjunct to the gynecologic cytology QI protocol and is the gold standard reference test for triaging women with equivocal cytologic diagnoses. The great value of HPV DNA testing is its high sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%) and negative predictive value (93.5%). HPV DNA testing results can be used as a tool to better determine the need for referrals for colposcopic biopsy, especially for patients with an ASCUS diagnosis. The residual Pap-Test specimens are stable and reproducible for HPV DNA typing. A working flow chart for our gynecologic cytology QI program was produced from the Pap-Test and HPV DNA assay results. This offer presents the added benefit of minimizing the problem of sample variation. The prevalence of HPV infection was 16.2% in this study.     

Can human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compare with physician-collected cervical samples and cytology for cervical cancer screening in developing countries?

Background: To determine human papillomavirus (HPV) types by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse line blot assay and examine the concordance between HPV by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and PCR on self-collected vaginal and physician-collected cervical samples and cytology. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 546 sexually active women aged ≥30 years with persistent vaginal discharge, intermenstrual or postcoital bleeding or an unhealthy cervix. Participants self-collected vaginal samples (HPV-S) and physicians collected cervical samples for conventional Pap smear and HPV DNA (HPV-P) testing and performed colposcopy, with directed biopsy, if indicated. HPV testing and genotyping was done by HC2 and PCR reverse line blot assay. Concordance between HC2 and PCR results of self- and physician-collected samples was determined using a Kappa statistic (κ) and Chi-square test. Results: Complete data were available for 512 sets with 98% of women providing a satisfactory self-sample. PCR detected oncogenic HPV in 12.3% of self- and 13.0% of physician-collected samples. Overall, there was 93.8% agreement between physician-collected and self-samples (κ = 76.31%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.97–82.29%, p = 0.04)—complete concordance in 473 cases (57 positive, 416 negative), partial concordance in seven pairs and discordance in 32 pairs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of self-sampling for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2+ disease were 82.5%, 93.6%, 52.4% and 98.4%, respectively; for physician-sampling they were 87.5%, 93.2%, 52.2% and 98.9%, respectively; and for cytology they were 77.5%, 87.3%, 34.1% and 97.9%, respectively. Concordance between HC2 and PCR was 90.9% for self-samples (κ = 63.7%, 95% CI: 55.2–72.2%) and 95.3% for physician-collected samples (κ = 80.4%, 95% CI: 71.8–89.0%). Conclusions: Self-HPV sampling compares favourably with physician-sampling and cytology. A rapid, affordable, HPV self-test kit can be used as the primary method of cervical cancer screening in low-resource situations.     

HPV Testing by cobas HPV Test in a Population from Catalonia

Background

HPV testing in cervical cancer screening has been proposed as an alternative or complementary to cytology in women older than 30 years. However, adequate clinical sensitivity and specificity are crucial for a new test to be implemented. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) has proved good clinical performance in selecting women at risk for high-grade intraepithelial lesions with a high sensitivity and specificity. cobas HPV Test has been recently launched and its performance in different clinical settings needs to be determined.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cobas HPV Test for the detection of cervical HPV infection in a population of women in Catalonia (Spain) using HC2 as a reference.

Materials and Methods

Cervical liquid cytology samples from 958 women have been studied. Sensitivity was analyzed in 60 samples from patients with a high-grade intraepithelial lesion (≥CIN2) on histology and specificity was determined in 898 samples from women with no ≥CIN2. All cases had HC2 and cobas HPV Test performed. Statistical analyses of sensitivity, specificity and comparison between HC2 and cobas HPV Test by a non-inferiority test were applied.

Results

Sensitivity of HC2 and cobas HPV Test for detecting ≥CIN2 proved identical (98.3%) while specificity was 85.3% and 86.2% respectively. The non-inferiority test demonstrated that cobas HPV Test surpassed 90% sensitivity and 98% specificity of HC2.

Conclusion

The cobas HPV Test results fulfilled sensitivity and specificity requirements for HPV based cervical cancer screening and for the triage of minor cytological abnormalities, allowing its introduction in clinical settings.     

P16/Ki-67细胞学双染在TCT诊断为非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASC-US)中的分流作用研究

目的:分析P16/Ki-67双染在TCT(Thinprep cytologic test)诊断为非典型鳞状细胞,意义不明确(Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance,ASC-US)的患者分流中的作用。方法:选取2016年9月-2018年9月在我院经宫颈液基细胞学检查诊断为ASC-US的434例女性患者为研究对象,采用P16/Ki-67双染、高危型HPV(High-Risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)检测,对比二者与宫颈组织学活检结果的相关性,并分析二者在ASC-US患者分流中的作用。结果:P16/Ki-67细胞学双染法的敏感性为78.2%,特异性为79.2%,HR-HPV法的敏感性为33.5%,特异性为62.3%。P16/Ki-67细胞学双染法在年轻组患者中检出高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)及以上病变的敏感性为94.5%,特异性为85.7%;在年长组患者中敏感性为44.4%,特异性为74.3%。结论:P16/Ki-67细胞学双染作为一种临床应用简单、患者易于接受、价格相对低廉的生物学标志物,为宫颈癌的早期筛查提供了新的选择。同时,对于年轻患者,P16/Ki-67双染用于ASC-US的分流比HR-HPV检测具有更高的临床应用价值。     

Cervical Cytology Specimen Stability in Surepath Preservative and Analytical Sensitivity for HPV Testing with the cobas and Hybrid Capture 2 Tests

None of the commercial HPV tests are U.S. FDA-approved for testing of cervical cytology specimens in SurePath preservative. Still, ~30% of HPV testing is performed on specimens in this formalin-containing preservative. Formalin-induced DNA fragmentation and cross-linking may interfere with HPV detection. We evaluated analytical sensitivity and specimen stability of the cobas 4800 HPV (Roche) and Hybrid Capture 2 HPV (HC2, Qiagen) tests with residual cervical cytology samples in SurePath preservative available within 1 week of collection. Cobas testing was performed with and without heating samples at 120°C for 20 min diluted 1:1 in an alkaline environment (pretreatment) to revert DNA crosslinking. Stability was tested after 2 weeks of storage at ambient temperature followed by ≤10 weeks at 4°C. Analytical sensitivity and positivity rates (HC2, 18%; cobas pretreated, 46%; cobas untreated, 47%) were greater for cobas than HC2 (n = 682). After 6 weeks of storage, mean HC2 ratios were lower (mean 0.9, SD 6.3) but high variability limited statistical power to detect trends. Cobas threshold cycles (Ct’s) increased in untreated (mean 2.1) but not pretreated samples (mean 0.3; n = 110; p≤0.0001). Overall, cobas had greater analytical sensitivity for samples in SurePath preservative. Although pretreatment introduced a manual sample transfer step and 30 min of incubation times, it improved stability without negatively affecting analytical sensitivity. While awaiting results of large trials to evaluate the clinical performance of cobas, the addition of the pretreatment step may improve the detection of HPV, especially after prolonged sample storage.     

Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer Based on High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 Genotyping,in Comparison to Cytology

Objectives

The objective of the present study is to assess the performance of a high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA test with individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping as a method for primary cervical cancer screening compared with liquid-based cytology (LBC) in a population of Greek women taking part in routine cervical cancer screening.

Methods

The study, conducted by the “HEllenic Real life Multicentric cErvical Screening” (HERMES) study group, involved the recruitment of 4,009 women, aged 25–55, who took part in routine cervical screening at nine Gynecology Departments in Greece. At first visit cervical specimens were collected for LBC and HPV testing using the Roche Cobas 4800 system. Women found positive for either cytology or HPV were referred for colposcopy, whereas women negative for both tests will be retested after three years. The study is ongoing and the results of the first screening round are reported herein.

Results

Valid results for cytology and HPV testing were obtained for 3,993 women. The overall prevalence of HR-HPV was 12.7%, of HPV-16 2.7% and of HPV-18 1.4%. Of those referred for colposcopy, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) was detected in 41 women (1.07%). At the threshold of CIN2+, cytology [atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse] and HPV testing showed a sensitivity of 53.7% and 100% respectively, without change between age groups. Cytology and HPV testing showed specificity of 96.8% and 90.3% respectively, which was increased in older women (≥30) in comparison to younger ones (25–29). Genotyping for HPV16/18 had similar accuracy to cytology for the detection of CIN2+ (sensitivity: 58.5%; specificity 97.5%) as well as for triage to colposcopy (sensitivity: 58.5% vs 53.7% for cytology).

Conclusion

HPV testing has much better sensitivity than cytology to identify high-grade cervical lesions with slightly lower specificity. HPV testing with individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping could represent a more accurate methodology for primary cervical cancer screening in comparison to liquid-based cytology, especially in older women.     

Hybrid capture II and polymerase chain reaction for identifying HPV infections in samples collected in a new collection medium: a comparison

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Hybrid Capture II (HCII) test (Digene, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.) in residual cells left in the collection vials of the DNACitoliq system (Digene Brasil, S?o Paulo, Brazil). STUDY DESIGN: A series of 263 cervical samples collected for liquid-based cytology with the DNACitoliq system was tested for oncogenic HPV types first with HCII and subsequently with PCR. After DNA purification with GFX Genomic Blood DNA Purification Kit (Amersham, Piscataway, New Jersey, U.S.A.), PCR was performed using AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). PGMY09/11 L1 consensus primers and GH20/PCO4 primers for human beta-globin target were coamplified. RESULTS: Altogether, 260 samples were positive for beta-globin, and 3 negative ones were excluded from the analysis. PCR and HCII yielded concordant results in 199 cases (76.5%) (102 positive and 97 negative), with Cohen's kappa of .577 (95% CI .477-.677) and weighted kappa of .733 (95% CI .659-.791). HPV prevalence in different categories of cytologic abnormalities was practically identical with HCII and PCR assays (P=.989). Among the 61 (23.5%) discrepant cases, 28 samples were HCII+/PCR- cases. Of these, 27 of 28 samples showed a low viral load, and 1 had an intermediate viral load. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that residual material from the DNACitoliq system adequately preserves HPV DNA for detection by HCII and PCR, with performance similar to that of specimen transport medium.     

Establishment of an efficient multiplex real‐time PCR assay for human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical cytology specimens: comparison with hybrid capture II

J.‐H. Lee, N.‐W. Lee, S.‐W. Hong, Y.‐S. Nam, J.‐W. Choi and Y.‐S. Kim Establishment of an efficient multiplex real‐time PCR assay for human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical cytology specimens: comparison with hybrid capture II Objective: To establish an efficient multiplex real‐time PCR assay for 15 human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, we designed multiplexing parameters and compared our PCR system with the hybrid capture (HC) II test using cervical cytology samples. Methods: For preventing cross‐reactive amplifications, variable HPV genes (E1, E2, E6, E7 and L1) were targeted. The melting temperatures of all primers and probes, and the size of the PCR product were optimized for the multiplex PCR. Our PCR system was compared with the HC II assays in the detection and genotyping of HPV infection using 173 cytology smears. Discordant cases between the two assays were verified by direct HPV DNA sequencing. Results: Of 173 women, 93 (53.8%) were HPV‐positive by the HC II assay and/or the multiplex real‐time PCR assay. The HPV genotypes were determined in 92 (98.9%) of 93 cases by the multiplex real‐time PCR and/or DNA sequencing. The agreement rate between multiplex PCR and HC II methods was 91.9% (kappa = 0.84). Although the sample size of this study needs to be increased to have epidemiological significance, multiple infections and HPV 16 were the predominant type. HPV 58, 52 and 18 accounted for 25% of HPV infections. HPV 52, 58 and 31 constituted 30% of CIN 2/3. Conclusion: The multiplex real‐time PCR system shows a good and reliable clinical performance. This in house PCR assay is fast and cost‐effective for HPV genotyping and the detection of HPV co‐infection in the post‐HPV vaccination era.     

The Role of Polymerase Chain Reaction of High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus in the Screening of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in the Anal Mucosa of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Males Having Sex with Males

Objectives

To evaluate the advantages of cytology and PCR of high-risk human papilloma virus (PCR HR-HPV) infection in biopsy-derived diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL = AIN2/AIN3) in HIV-positive men having sex with men (MSM).

Methods

This is a single-centered study conducted between May 2010 and May 2014 in patients (n = 201, mean age 37 years) recruited from our outpatient clinic. Samples of anal canal mucosa were taken into liquid medium for PCR HPV analysis and for cytology. Anoscopy was performed for histology evaluation.

Results

Anoscopy showed 33.8% were normal, 47.8% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 18.4% HSIL; 80.2% had HR-HPV. PCR of HR-HPV had greater sensitivity than did cytology (88.8% vs. 75.7%) in HSIL screening, with similar positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 20.3 vs. 22.9 and 89.7 vs. 88.1, respectively. Combining both tests increased the sensitivity and NPV of HSIL diagnosis to 100%. Correlation of cytology vs. histology was, generally, very low and PCR of HR-HPV vs. histology was non-existent (<0.2) or low (<0.4). Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve analysis of cytology and PCR HR-HPV for the diagnosis of HSIL was poor (<0.6). Multivariate regression analysis showed protective factors against HSIL were: viral suppression (OR: 0.312; 95%CI: 0.099-0.984), and/or syphilis infection (OR: 0.193; 95%CI: 0.045-0.827). HSIL risk was associated with HPV-68 genotype (OR: 20.1; 95%CI: 2.04-197.82).

Conclusions

When cytology and PCR HR-HPV findings are normal, the diagnosis of pre-malignant HSIL can be reliably ruled-out in HIV-positive patients. HPV suppression with treatment protects against the appearance of HSIL.     

Two L1-peptides are excellent tools for serological detection of HPV-associated cervical carcinoma lesions

A persistent high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection causes cervical intraepithelial lesions and cervical carcinoma. There is evidence that detecting anti-L1 antibodies could be successfully used for discriminating between cervical lesion patients and women having normal cytology. It was found that peptides 18283 (55PNNNKILVPKVSGLQYRVFR74) and 18294 (284LYIKGSGSTANLASSNYFPT300) from the L1-surface exposed regions were specifically recognised by antibodies from the cervical lesion patient sera. These peptides were tested against 165 womens' normal cytology sera and 148 cervical lesion or cervical cancer patients' sera. Less than 3.6% of women's normal cytology sera recognised peptides 18283 or 18294; on the contrary, 91% to 96% of the cervical lesion (CIN I to CIN III) or cervical cancer patient sera recognised peptides 18283 and 18294. These data show that anti-peptide 18283 and 18294 antibodies in the patients' sera are strongly associated with the presence of HR-HPV associated cervical lesions, showing 92-97% sensitivity and 89-95% specificity in recognising precancerous and cervical cancer patients. These two peptides could be excellent tools for use in large-scale serological screening of women populations at risk of developing cervical carcinoma.     

Good agreements between self and clinician-collected specimens for the detection of human papillomavirus in Brazilian patients

Women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) are at a higher risk of developing cervical lesions. In the current study, self and clinician-collected vaginal and cervical samples from women were processed to detect HPV DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with PGMY09/11 primers. HPV genotypes were determined using type-specific PCR. HPV DNA detection showed good concordance between self and clinician-collected samples (84.6%; kappa = 0.72). HPV infection was found in 30% women and genotyping was more concordant among high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) than low-risk HPV (HR-HPV). HPV16 was the most frequently detected among the HR-HPV types. LR-HPV was detected at a higher frequency in self-collected; however, HR-HPV types were more frequently identified in clinician-collected samples than in self-collected samples. HPV infections of multiple types were detected in 20.5% of clinician-collected samples and 15.5% of self-collected samples. In this study, we demonstrated that the HPV DNA detection rate in self-collected samples has good agreement with that of clinician-collected samples. Self-collected sampling, as a primary prevention strategy in countries with few resources, could be effective for identifying cases of HR-HPV, being more acceptable. The use of this method would enhance the coverage of screening programs for cervical cancer.     

Usefulness of HPV testing in the follow-up of untreated cervical low grade lesions

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the usefulness of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing for the follow-up of women with untreated low grade cervical squamous cell lesions (LSIL). For that, 412 women with a cytological diagnosis of LSIL at entry were monitored by cytology, HR-HPV testing with the Hybrid Capture II assay (HC-II) and colposcopy. Our primary endpoint was clinical progression defined by the presence of a high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 and CIN3) at the biopsy. At baseline, histological control revealed 10 CIN2 and 11 CIN3 only in the cohort of women HR-HPV+. In the follow-up, 4 CIN2 and 8 CIN3 were detected, always in the women initially HR-HPV+. Thus, the recurrence of a HR-HPV+ infection clearly selects a population at high-risk for CIN2-3. The semi-quantitative appreciation of the viral load with HC-II could not be used as a good prognostic factor for the follow-up of women with LSIL. HR-HPV testing reduces the number of cytology and colposcopy examinations in the follow-up of women aged >35 years when HPV testing is initially negative. Thus HR-HPV testing should be reserved for the follow-up of this population of women initially HR-HPV+ and proposed 6 to 12 months after the cytological diagnosis of LSIL.     

Morphologic, patient and interpreter profiles of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive vs.-negative cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

OBJECTIVE: To define the morphologic and patient profiles, if any, that distinguish high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) from HR-HPV-negative ASCUS and to compare individual and laboratory reporting rates with the national averages. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fifty liquid-based cervicovaginal preparations (ThinPrep, Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) with a diagnosis of ASCUS and a reflex HR-HPV test were assessed for the following features: background patient information, cell morphology, cell patterns and interpreter profiles. Fisher's Exact test (2-tailed) was used to calculate the exact probability of obtaining results by chance. RESULTS: The median age of the HR-HPV-positive patients was approximately 11 years younger than the HPV-negative group, and pregnant patients were also more apt to be HPV positive. Atypical cells in greater numbers and in groups as opposed to single cells correlated more often with HR-HPV-positive individuals. Koilocytelike changes and parakeratosis were more frequently associated with HR-HPV, but the presence of Trichomonas was usually a negative predictor. CONCLUSION: In cases diagnosed as ASCUS, there are certain cytologic features and patient types that are more likely to be associated with HR-HPV positivity. This could be used in everyday practice to further fine tune the diagnosis of ASCUS. Monitoring individual and laboratory ASCUS rates with HR-HPV positivity can be an important quality improvement indicator.     

Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening and screening–triage strategies among women living with HIV-1 in Burkina Faso and South Africa: A cohort study

BackgroundCervical cancer screening strategies using visual inspection or cytology may have suboptimal diagnostic accuracy for detection of precancer in women living with HIV (WLHIV). The optimal screen and screen–triage strategy, age to initiate, and frequency of screening for WLHIV remain unclear. This study evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of different cervical cancer strategies in WLHIV in Africa.Methods and findingsWLHIV aged 25–50 years attending HIV treatment centres in Burkina Faso (BF) and South Africa (SA) from 5 December 2011 to 30 October 2012 were enrolled in a prospective evaluation study of visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) or visual inspection using Lugol’s iodine (VILI), high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test (Hybrid Capture 2 [HC2] or careHPV), and cytology for histology-verified high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) at baseline and endline, a median 16 months later. Among 1,238 women (BF: 615; SA: 623), median age was 36 and 34 years (p < 0.001), 28.6% and 49.6% ever had prior cervical cancer screening (p < 0.001), and 69.9% and 64.2% were taking ART at enrolment (p = 0.045) in BF and SA, respectively. CIN2+ prevalence was 5.8% and 22.4% in BF and SA (p < 0.001), respectively. VIA had low sensitivity for CIN2+ (44.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 36.9%–52.7%) and CIN3+ (56.1%, 95% CI 43.3%–68.3%) in both countries, with specificity for ≤CIN1 of 78.7% (95% CI 76.0%–81.3%). HC2 had sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI 82.9%–93.2%) for CIN2+ and 86.4% (95% CI 75.7%–93.6%) for CIN3+. Specificity for ≤CIN1 was 55.4% (95% CI 52.2%–58.6%), and screen positivity was 51.3%. Specificity was higher with a restricted genotype (HPV16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58) approach (73.5%, 95% CI 70.6%–76.2%), with lower screen positivity (33.7%), although there was lower sensitivity for CIN3+ (77.3%, 95% CI 65.3%–86.7%). In BF, HC2 was more sensitive for CIN2+/CIN3+ compared to VIA/VILI (relative sensitivity for CIN2+ = 1.72, 95% CI 1.28–2.32; CIN3+: 1.18, 95% CI 0.94–1.49). Triage of HC2-positive women with VIA/VILI reduced the number of colposcopy referrals, but with loss in sensitivity for CIN2+ (58.1%) but not for CIN3+ (84.6%). In SA, cytology high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or greater (HSIL+) had best combination of sensitivity (CIN2+: 70.1%, 95% CI 61.3%–77.9%; CIN3+: 80.8%, 95% CI 67.5%–90.4%) and specificity (81.6%, 95% CI 77.6%–85.1%). HC2 had similar sensitivity for CIN3+ (83.0%, 95% CI 70.2%–91.9%) but lower specificity compared to HSIL+ (42.7%, 95% CI 38.4%–47.1%; relative specificity = 0.57, 95% CI 0.52–0.63), resulting in almost twice as many referrals. Compared to HC2, triage of HC2-positive women with HSIL+ resulted in a 40% reduction in colposcopy referrals but was associated with some loss in sensitivity. CIN2+ incidence over a median 16 months was highest among VIA baseline screen-negative women (2.2%, 95% CI 1.3%–3.7%) and women who were baseline double-negative with HC2 and VIA (2.1%, 95% CI 1.3%–3.5%) and lowest among HC2 baseline screen-negative women (0.5%, 95% CI 0.1%–1.8%). Limitations of our study are that WLHIV included in the study may not reflect a contemporary cohort of WLHIV initiating ART in the universal ART era and that we did not evaluate HPV tests available in study settings today.ConclusionsIn this cohort study among WLHIV in Africa, a human papillomavirus (HPV) test targeting 14 high-risk (HR) types had higher sensitivity to detect CIN2+ compared to visual inspection but had low specificity, although a restricted genotype approach targeting 8 HR types decreased the number of unnecessary colposcopy referrals. Cytology HSIL+ had optimal performance for CIN2+/CIN3+ detection in SA. Triage of HPV-positive women with HSIL+ maintained high specificity but with some loss in sensitivity compared to HC2 alone.

In this cohort study, Helen Kelly and colleagues explore cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV.     

High-risk HPV detection by Hybrid Capture and ploidy determination by a computer-assisted system in cervical biopsies

OBJECTIVE: To correlate high-risk HPV (hrHPV) detection by Hybrid Capture II (HC2) (Digene, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.) with DNA content (ploidy) of cervical biopsies analyzed by a computer-assisted system. STUDY DESIGN: Cervical biopsies from 54 women examined at Leonor Mendes de Barros Hospital, S?o Paulo, as part of the Latin American Screening study during 2002--2003, were tested for hrHPV with HC2. All patients had been referred for colposcopic examination due to an abnormal cervical cytology. The final diagnosis included 30 cervicitis, 14 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 5 CIN 2, 4 CIN 3 and 1 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Five-micrometer sections of each biopsy were stained with Feulgen-tionine and evaluated with the CAS 200 System (Becton Dickinson, U.S.A.), using the 3.0 software (version 8.1) of the DNA Quantitative Measurement Program (Becton Dickinson). Ploidy was evaluated from histograms obtained by analyzing atypical nuclei. RESULTS: Of the 30 cervicitis cases, 28 (93.3%) were diploid, and hrHPV was detected in 8 (28.5%) of the cases. Two tetraploid cervicitis lesions were observed, 1 positive and 1 negative for hrHPV. Among the CIN 1 lesions, 8 (57.1%) were diploid and 6 (42.8%) aneuploid. Of the latter, 4 (66.6%) were negative and 2 (33.3%) positive for hrHPV. Of the 5 CIN 2 lesions, 2 were diploid, 2 aneuploid and 1 tetraploid; all were positive for hrHPV. All CIN 3 lesions and the SCC proved to be aneuploid and positive for hrHPV. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the majority of cervicitis and CIN 1 lesions are diploid and negativef or hrHPV. This is in sharp contrast to high grade CIN 2-3 lesions, all of which were positive for hrHPV in this study and also aneuploid, consistent with their progressive potential.     

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

P16(INK4a) immunocytochemistry in liquid-based cytology samples in equivocal Pap smears: added value in management of women with equivocal Pap smear

OBJECTIVE: To test whether p1l6(INK4a) immunocytochemistry (ICC) in liquid-based cytology (LBC) is useful with colposcopy in abnormal Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: A series of 248 women with abnormal Pap smear were analyzed for oncogenic (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) types using the Hybrid Capture II assay and for p16(INK4a) expression using ICC on cervical samples in PreservCyt liquid media. Colposcopic and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) cone biopsy were the gold standard. RESULTS: p16(INK4a) ICC did best as predictor of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, with OR 12.18 (2.72-54.57) (p = 0.0001), showing 88.2% sensitivity (SE), 61.9% specificity (SP), 14.6% positive predictive value (PPV) and 98.6% negative predictive value (NPV). In sorting discrepant cases, p16(INK4a) ICC results in 100% SE and 100% NPV in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 lesions among Pap+/biopsy- women. In atypical squamous cells undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytology, adding p16(INK4a) ICC improves specificity of colposcopy from 27.3% to 81.8% and PPV from 42.8% to 71.4%. Best performance is obtained with p16(INK4a) ICC and colposcopy: 83.3% SE, 81.8% SP, 71.4% PPV and 90.0% NPV. CONCLUSION p16(INK4a) is useful in sorting clinically relevant discrepant cases, and p16(INK4a) ICC significantly improves SP and PPV of colposcopy in management of ASCUS cytology.