Heat shock 70 kDa protein 5/glucose-regulated protein 78 “AMP”ing up autophagy

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women, with more than 240,000 new cases reported in the United States in 2011. Classification of breast cancer based upon hormone and growth factor receptor profiling shows that approximately 70% of all breast cancers express estrogen receptor-α. Thus, drugs that either block estrogen biosynthesis (aromatase inhibitors like Letrozole), or compete with estrogen for estrogen receptor (ER) binding (selective ER modulators including tamoxifen; TAM) and/or cause ER degradation (selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant), are among the most prescribed targeted therapeutics for breast cancer. However, overall clinical benefit from the use of these drugs is often limited by resistance; ER⁺ breast cancers either fail to respond to endocrine therapies initially (de novo resistance), or they respond and then lose sensitivity over time (acquired resistance). While several preclinical studies postulate how antiestrogen resistance occurs, for the most part, the molecular mechanism(s) of resistance is unknown.     

Support Vector Machine Classifier for Estrogen Receptor Positive and Negative Early-Onset Breast Cancer

Two major breast cancer sub-types are defined by the expression of estrogen receptors on tumour cells. Cancers with large numbers of receptors are termed estrogen receptor positive and those with few are estrogen receptor negative. Using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism genotype data for a sample of early-onset breast cancer patients we developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier from 200 germline variants associated with estrogen receptor status (p<0.0005). Using a linear kernel Support Vector Machine, we achieved classification accuracy exceeding 93%. The model indicates that polygenic variation in more than 100 genes is likely to underlie the estrogen receptor phenotype in early-onset breast cancer. Functional classification of the genes involved identifies enrichment of functions linked to the immune system, which is consistent with the current understanding of the biological role of estrogen receptors in breast cancer.     

Apoptotic action of estrogen

Estrogen as a mitogen stimulates cell proliferation and prevents cell death in many cell types. In patients, estrogen is known to stimulate breast and uterus cancer development. Ironically, high doses of estrogen can induce regression of hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The comprehensive mechanism by which estrogen induces tumor recession in breast cancer is still unknown, but activation of the Fas/FasL pathways plays a key role in this process. Laboratory studies show that the apoptotic action of estrogen is the major factor leading to cell number decreases in several cell types. The effects of estrogen are estrogen-receptor dependent. In this mini review, we will focus on the latest findings regarding estrogen apoptotic effects in several cell models, including breast cancer cells, and summarize the possible mechanisms involved in these estrogen mediated processes. New potential implications for the pharmacological control of breast cancer with estrogen in post-menopausal women are also discussed.     

The selective estrogen enzyme modulator (SEEM) in breast cancer

Human breast cancer tissue contains all the enzymes (estrone sulfatase, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, aromatase) involved in the last steps of estradiol biosynthesis. This tissue also contains sulfotransferase for the formation of the biologically inactive estrogen sulfates. In the last years, it was demonstrated that various progestins (promegestone, nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone), as well as tibolone and its metabolites are potent inhibitors of sulfatase and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activities. It was also shown that medrogestone, nomegestrol acetate, promegestone or tibolone can stimulate the sulfotransferase activity for the local production of estrogen sulfates. All these data, in addition to numerous agents, which can block the aromatase action, lead to the new concept of selective estrogen enzyme modulators (SEEM), which can largely apply to breast cancer tissue. The exploration of various progestins and other active agents in trials with breast cancer patients, showing an inhibitory effect on sulfatase and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, or a stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase, will provide a new possibility in the treatment of this disease.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the estrogen receptor gene and breast cancer susceptibility

In order to evaluate the role of inherited variation in the estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene in human breast cancer, we determined intronic sequences flanking each ESRI exon; identified multiple SNPs and length polymorphisms in the ESR1 coding sequence, splice junctions and regulatory regions; and genotyped families at high risk of breast cancer and population-based breast cancer patients and controls. Of 10 polymorphic sites in ESR1, four are synonymous SNPs, two are nonsynonymous SNPs and four are length polymorphisms; five are novel. No ESR1 polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer, either in the high-risk families or the case-control study. We therefore conclude that inherited genetic variation is not a mechanism by which the estrogen receptor is commonly involved in breast cancer development.     

Acquired resistance to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in clinical practice (tamoxifen & raloxifene) by selection pressure in breast cancer cell populations

Tamoxifen, a pioneering selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has long been a therapeutic choice for all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The clinical application of long-term adjuvant antihormone therapy for the breast cancer has significantly improved breast cancer survival. However, acquired resistance to SERM remains a significant challenge in breast cancer treatment. The evolution of acquired resistance to SERMs treatment was primarily discovered using MCF-7 tumors transplanted in athymic mice to mimic years of adjuvant treatment in patients. Acquired resistance to tamoxifen is unique because the growth of resistant tumors is dependent on SERMs. It appears that acquired resistance to SERM is initially able to utilize either E₂ or a SERM as the growth stimulus in the SERM-resistant breast tumors. Mechanistic studies reveal that SERMs continuously suppress nuclear ER-target genes even during resistance, whereas they function as agonists to activate multiple membrane-associated molecules to promote cell growth. Laboratory observations in vivo further show that three phases of acquired SERM-resistance exists, depending on the length of SERMs exposure. Tumors with Phase I resistance are stimulated by both SERMs and estrogen. Tumors with Phase II resistance are stimulated by SERMs, but are inhibited by estrogen due to apoptosis. The laboratory models suggest a new treatment strategy, in which limited-duration, low-dose estrogen can be used to purge Phase II-resistant breast cancer cells. This discovery provides an invaluable insight into the evolution of drug resistance to SERMs, and this knowledge is now being used to justify clinical trials of estrogen therapy following long-term antihormone therapy. All of these results suggest that cell populations that have acquired resistance are in constant evolution depending upon selection pressure. The limited availability of growth stimuli in any new environment enhances population plasticity in the trial and error search for survival.     

Effects of Combination of Estradiol with Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs) on Human Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo

Use of estrogen or estrogen / progestin combination was an approved regimen for menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT). However, more recent patient-centered studies revealed an increase in the incidence of breast cancer in women receiving menopausal hormone therapy with estrogen plus progestin rather than estrogen alone. Tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) has been proposed to eliminate the progesterone component of MHT with supporting evidences. Based on our previous studies it is evident that SPRMs have a safer profile on endometrium in preventing unopposed estrogenicity. We hypothesized that a combination of estradiol (E2) with selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) to exert a safer profile on endometrium will also reduce mammary gland proliferation and could be used to prevent breast cancer when used in MHT. In order to test our hypothesis, we compared the estradiol alone or in combination with our novel SPRMs, EC312 and EC313. The compounds were effectively controlled E2 mediated cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in T47D breast cancer cells. The observed effects were found comparable that of BZD in vitro. The effects of SPRMs were confirmed by receptor binding studies as well as gene and protein expression studies. Proliferation markers were found downregulated with EC312/313 treatment in vitro and reduced E2 induced mammary gland proliferation, evidenced as reduced ductal branching and terminal end bud growth in vivo. These data supporting our hypothesis that E2+EC312/EC313 blocked the estrogen action may provide basic rationale to further test the clinical efficacy of SPRMs to prevent breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women undergoing MHT.     

Metabolism of estrogens in breast cancer.

This extensive literature compilation reviews major studies on estrogen metabolism in cancer, studies which have led to proposed possible etiological roles of estrogens in human breast cancer. Urinary and plasma estrogen excretion patterns and profiles in women with breast cancer are the topics of part 1. Studies of estrogen profiles in women who are at high-risk for breast cancer are critiqued. The estriol hypothesis is presented and criticised in a chapter. The effects of endocrine ablation on urinary estrogen profiles in breast cancer patients are compiled. Production and metabolism of estrogens in women with breast cancer are rendered, including in vivo biotransformation rates and in vitro transformation data. And the search for estrogen metabolites in women with breast cancer is reviewed. In conclusion it is obvious that the question of whether breast cancer patients have an abnormal metabolism of estrogen has not been answered, but further investigations of estrogen metabolism in breast cancer should be continued because: 1) the possibility that estrogens are carcinogenic has not been ruled out; 2) receptors have been discovered which do correlate with hormone dependency of tumors; 3) present evidence suggests that neoplasm may induce abnormal estrogen metabolism; 4) directional changes of estrogen metabolism that occur in pregnancy may also occur in women with target tissue neoplasia; 5) hepatic tissue's relationship to breast cancer has not received attention; and 6) the role of peripheral aromatization in the pathogenesis of mammary cancer is not yet understood.     

Progress in the prevention of breast cancer: concept to reality

In 1936, Professor Antoine Lacassagne suggested that breast cancer could be prevented by developing drugs to block estrogen action in the breast. Jensen discovered the physiologic target, the estrogen receptor, that regulates estrogen action in its target tissues and Lerner discovered the first nonsteroidal antiestrogen MER25. However, the success of tamoxifen as a treatment of breast cancer opened the door for the testing of the worth of tamoxifen to reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women. In 1998, Fisher showed that tamoxifen could reduce breast cancer incidence by 50%. Nevertheless, only half the women who develop breast cancer have risk factors other than age, so what can be done for women without risk factors? The recognition that nonsteroidal antiestrogens have the ability to modulate estrogen action selectively has advanced the design and development of new drug for multiple diseases. Tamoxifen and raloxifene maintain bone density and raloxifene is now used to prevent osteoporosis and is being tested as a preventive for coronary heart disease and breast cancer. The drug group is now known as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and the challenge is to design new agents for multiple applications. If the 20th century was the era of chemotherapy, the 21st century will be the era of chemoprevention.     

Recent insight on the control of enzymes involved in estrogen formation and transformation in human breast cancer

The great majority of breast cancers are in their early stage hormone-dependent and it is well accepted that estradiol (E₂) plays an important role in the genesis and evolution of this tumor. Human breast cancer tissues contain all the enzymes: estrone sulfatase, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, aromatase involved in the last steps of E₂ bioformation. Sulfotransferases which convert estrogens into the biologically inactive estrogen sulfates are also present in this tissue. Quantitative data show that the ‘sulfatase pathway’, which transforms estrogen sulfates into the bioactive unconjugated E₂, is 100–500 times higher than the ‘aromatase pathway’, which converts androgens into estrogens.

The treatment of breast cancer patients with anti-aromatases is largely developed with very positive results. However, the formation of E₂ via the ‘sulfatase pathway’ is very important in the breast cancer tissue. In recent years it was found that antiestrogens (e.g. tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen), various progestins (e.g. promegestone, nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, dydrogesterone, norelgestromin), tibolone and its metabolites, as well as other steroidal (e.g. sulfamates) and non-steroidal compounds, are potent sulfatase inhibitors. In another series of studies, it was found that E₂ itself has a strong anti-sulfatase action. This paradoxical effect of E₂ adds a new biological response of this hormone and could be related to estrogen replacement therapy in which it was observed to have either no effect or to decrease breast cancer mortality in postmenopausal women. Interesting information is that high expression of steroid sulfatase mRNA predicts a poor prognosis in patients with +ER. These progestins, as well as tibolone, can also block the conversion of estrone to estradiol by the inhibition of the 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I (17β-HSD-1). High expressison of 17β-HSD-1 can be an indicator of adverse prognosis in ER-positive patients.

It was shown that nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone or tibolone, could stimulate the sulfotransferase activity for the local production of estrogen sulfates. This is an important point in the physiopathology of this disease, as it is well known that estrogen sulfates are biologically inactive. A possible correlation between this stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity and breast cancer cell proliferation is presented. In agreement with all this information, we have proposed the concept of selective estrogen enzyme modulators (SEEM).

In conclusion, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity in combination with anti-aromatases can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.     

Synthesis and structure–activity relationships of novel hybrid ferrocenyl compounds based on a bicyclic core skeleton for breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women worldwide, and incidence is increasing year by year. Although current selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have clear advantages in the treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer, they are ineffective for ER(−). In this study, we describe the design and synthesis of a series of dual-acting estrogen receptor (ER) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors with incorporation of the ferrocenyl moiety, leading to novel hybrid ferrocenyl complexes (FcOBHS–HDACis) for breast cancer therapy. It is worth to note that these ferrocenyl conjugates could not only potently inhibit HDACs and the proliferation of ERα positive (ER(+)) breast cancer cells (MCF-7), but also show significant antiproliferative effect on ER(−) breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). Thus, the FcOBHS–HDACi conjugates represent a novel approach to the development of efficiently dual-acting agents for treatment of breast cancer.     

雌激素受体信号通路在乳腺癌发生和治疗中的作用

雌激素受体信号通路在调控乳腺细胞增殖和凋亡等生理机能中发挥重要功能,该通路出现调控异常时可导致乳腺癌发生。雌激素受体在乳腺癌发生中的作用机制包括核受体介导的基因组信号通路和膜受体介导的非基因组信号通路以及二者的相互作用。基于雌激素受体信号通路及其关键信号分子的靶向治疗是开展乳腺癌治疗的重要策略与有效途径。对雌激素受体结构以及雌激素受体信号通路在乳腺癌发生和治疗中的作用作一综述。     

Vascular effects of aromatase inhibitors: data from clinical trials

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are becoming the endocrine treatment of first choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are under investigation for use in breast cancer prevention. AIs reduce circulating estrogen to barely detectable concentrations. It is possible that such a low concentration will be deleterious to the vascular system since estrogen receptors are known to be in the cell walls of blood vessels and estrogen is thought to be important in maintaining blood vessel integrity. Because most women who present with primary breast cancer are cured by surgery and systemic therapy and the major cause of female death is vascular disease, it is particularly important to investigate the vascular side effects of AIs in current breast cancer adjuvant and prevention trials. In order to set the vascular toxicities of AIs reported in the current adjuvant trials into context, here we compare them with the toxicities seen during treatment with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Clinical trial evidence indicates that HRT increases risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) whereas SERMs and AIs (to date) appear to be neutral. Cerebrovascular disease and venous thromboembotic events are increased by HRT and SERMs but appear to be unaffected by treatment with AIs. Cognitive function is also considered here since it may also have a vascular component and is potentially a serious potential side effect/benefit of AIs. Recent studies indicate that HRT has a small detrimental effect on cognitive function and is associated with a doubling of the incidence of dementia. A comprehensive study of the SERM, raloxifene, on cognitive function showed no significant effect. There are no definitive reported studies investigating tamoxifen and none for AIs on cognitive function, although there is one in progress in the context of the IBIS II prevention trial which compares anastrozole to placebo in women at high risk. At present concerns about deleterious vascular side effects are confined to HRT and SERMs. However, we have few long-term data using AIs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.     

Antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients reduces the risk of subsequent lung cancer: A population-based study

BackgroundThere is accumulating epidemiological and preclinical evidence that estrogen might be a driver of lung cancer. Breast cancer survivors can offer a unique patient cohort to examine the effect of antiestrogen therapy on lung cancer carcinogenesis because many of these women would have received long-term selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and/or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant treatment. Our hypothesis is that estrogens play a role in lung cancer development, and that antiestrogen therapy would affect the incidence of subsequent lung cancer among breast cancer survivors.MethodsUsing the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database, the study included 40,900 survivors of non-metastatic breast cancer after primary surgery, and most antiestrogen users complied well with the medication regimen. We evaluate the effect of antiestrogen therapy on the incidence of subsequent lung cancers.ResultsThis population-based study revealed that antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent lung cancer in older patients (≥50 years) (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.54–0.99) when compared with breast cancer survivors who did not use antiestrogens.ConclusionThe study supports the hypothesis that antiestrogen therapy modifies lung cancer carcinogenesis in older women. Further well-designed clinical trials to explore the potential of antiestrogens in lung cancer prevention and treatment would be worthwhile.     

Aromatase and cyclooxygenases: enzymes in breast cancer

Aromatase (estrogen synthase) is the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex that converts C₁₉ androgens to C₁₈ estrogens. Aromatase activity has been demonstrated in breast tissue in vitro, and expression of aromatase is highest in or near breast tumor sites. Thus, local regulation of aromatase by both endogenous factors as well as exogenous medicinal agents will influence the levels of estrogen available for breast cancer growth. The prostaglandin PGE₂ increases intracellular cAMP levels and stimulates estrogen biosynthesis, and previous studies in our laboratories have shown a strong linear association between aromatase (CYP19) expression and expression of the cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) in breast cancer specimens. To further investigate the pathways regulating COX and CYP19 gene expression, studies were performed in normal breast stromal cells, in breast cancer cells from patients, and in breast cancer cell lines using selective pharmacological agents. Enhanced COX enzyme levels results in increased production of prostaglandins, such as PGE₂. This prostaglandin increased aromatase activity in breast stromal cells, and studies with selective agonists and antagonists showed that this regulation of signaling pathways occurs through the EP₁ and EP₂ receptor subtypes. COX-2 gene expression was enhanced in breast cancer cell lines by ligands for the various peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), and differential regulation was observed between hormone-dependent and -independent breast cancer cells. Thus, the regulation of both enzymes in breast cancer involves complex paracrine interactions, resulting in significant consequences on the pathogenesis of breast cancer.