Inhibition of the cGAS‐STING pathway ameliorates the premature senescence hallmarks of Ataxia‐Telangiectasia brain organoids

Ataxia‐telangiectasia (A‐T) is a genetic disorder caused by the lack of functional ATM kinase. A‐T is characterized by chronic inflammation, neurodegeneration and premature ageing features that are associated with increased genome instability, nuclear shape alterations, micronuclei accumulation, neuronal defects and premature entry into cellular senescence. The causal relationship between the detrimental inflammatory signature and the neurological deficiencies of A‐T remains elusive. Here, we utilize human pluripotent stem cell‐derived cortical brain organoids to study A‐T neuropathology. Mechanistically, we show that the cGAS‐STING pathway is required for the recognition of micronuclei and induction of a senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in A‐T olfactory neurosphere‐derived cells and brain organoids. We further demonstrate that cGAS and STING inhibition effectively suppresses self‐DNA‐triggered SASP expression in A‐T brain organoids, inhibits astrocyte senescence and neurodegeneration, and ameliorates A‐T brain organoid neuropathology. Our study thus reveals that increased cGAS and STING activity is an important contributor to chronic inflammation and premature senescence in the central nervous system of A‐T and constitutes a novel therapeutic target for treating neuropathology in A‐T patients.     

Dissecting cellular responses to irradiation via targeted disruptions of the ATM-CHK1-PP2A circuit

Exposure of proliferating cells to genotoxic stresses activates a cascade of signaling events termed the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR preserves genetic stability by detecting DNA lesions, activating cell cycle checkpoints and promoting DNA damage repair. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs) ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), ATM and Rad 3-related kinase (ATR) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) are crucial for sensing lesions and signal transduction. The checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is a traditional ATR target involved in DDR and normal cell cycle progression and represents a pharmacological target for anticancer regimens. This study employed cell lines stably depleted for CHK1, ATM or both for dissecting cross-talk and compensatory effects on G?/M checkpoint in response to ionizing radiation (IR). We show that a 90% depletion of CHK1 renders cells radiosensitive without abrogating their IR-mediated G?/M checkpoint arrest. ATM phosphorylation is enhanced in CHK1-deficient cells compared with their wild-type counterparts. This correlates with lower nuclear abundance of the PP2A catalytic subunit in CHK1-depleted cells. Stable depletion of CHK1 in an ATM-deficient background showed only a 50% reduction from wild-type CHK1 protein expression levels and resulted in an additive attenuation of the G?/M checkpoint response compared with the individual knockdowns. ATM inhibition and 90% CHK1 depletion abrogated the early G?/M checkpoint and precluded the cells from mounting an efficient compensatory response to IR at later time points. Our data indicates that dual targeting of ATM and CHK1 functionalities disrupts the compensatory response to DNA damage and could be exploited for developing efficient anti-neoplastic treatments.     

The RNA surveillance protein SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double-strand breaks but not exogenously oxidized mRNA

DNA damage, stalled replication forks, errors in mRNA splicing and availability of nutrients activate specific phosphatidylinositiol-3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) that in turn phosphorylate downstream targets such as p53 on serine 15. While the PIKK proteins ATM and ATR respond to specific DNA lesions, SMG1 responds to errors in mRNA splicing and when cells are exposed to genotoxic stress. Yet, whether genotoxic stress activates SMG1 through specific types of DNA lesions or RNA damage remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that siRNA oligonucleotides targeting the mRNA surveillance proteins SMG1, Upf1, Upf2 or the PIKK protein ATM attenuated p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in cells damaged by high oxygen (hyperoxia), a model of persistent oxidative stress that damages nucleotides. In contrast, loss of SMG1 or ATM, but not Upf1 or Upf2 reduced p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks produced by expression of the endonuclease I-PpoI. To determine whether SMG1-dependent activation of p53 was in response to oxidative mRNA damage, mRNA encoding green fluorescence protein (GFP) transcribed in vitro was oxidized by Fenton chemistry and transfected into cells. Although oxidation of GFP mRNA resulted in dose-dependent fragmentation of the mRNA and reduced expression of GFP, it did not stimulate p53 or the p53-target gene p21. These findings establish SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double strand breaks independent of the RNA surveillance proteins Upf1 or Upf2; however, these proteins can stimulate p53 in response to oxidative stress but not necessarily oxidized RNA.Key words: DNA double strand breaks, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), oxidative stress, phosphatidylinositiol-3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs), RNA damage     

BRCA2 promotes DNA‐RNA hybrid resolution by DDX5 helicase at DNA breaks to facilitate their repair

The BRCA2 tumor suppressor is a DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair factor essential for maintaining genome integrity. BRCA2‐deficient cells spontaneously accumulate DNA‐RNA hybrids, a known source of genome instability. However, the specific role of BRCA2 on these structures remains poorly understood. Here we identified the DEAD‐box RNA helicase DDX5 as a BRCA2‐interacting protein. DDX5 associates with DNA‐RNA hybrids that form in the vicinity of DSBs, and this association is enhanced by BRCA2. Notably, BRCA2 stimulates the DNA‐RNA hybrid‐unwinding activity of DDX5 helicase. An impaired BRCA2‐DDX5 interaction, as observed in cells expressing the breast cancer variant BRCA2‐T207A, reduces the association of DDX5 with DNA‐RNA hybrids, decreases the number of RPA foci, and alters the kinetics of appearance of RAD51 foci upon irradiation. Our findings are consistent with DNA‐RNA hybrids constituting an impediment for the repair of DSBs by homologous recombination and reveal BRCA2 and DDX5 as active players in their removal.     

DNA Damage Sensing by the ATM and ATR Kinases

In eukaryotic cells, maintenance of genomic stability relies on the coordinated action of a network of cellular processes, including DNA replication, DNA repair, cell-cycle progression, and others. The DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathway orchestrated by the ATM and ATR kinases is the central regulator of this network in response to DNA damage. Both ATM and ATR are activated by DNA damage and DNA replication stress, but their DNA-damage specificities are distinct and their functions are not redundant. Furthermore, ATM and ATR often work together to signal DNA damage and regulate downstream processes. Here, we will discuss the recent findings and current models of how ATM and ATR sense DNA damage, how they are activated by DNA damage, and how they function in concert to regulate the DDR.During their lifespan, cells are inevitably challenged by extrinsic and intrinsic stresses that threaten the integrity of their genomes. To survive these adverse conditions and pass on intact genetic information to subsequent generations, cells have evolved a highly organized and coordinated effort to ameliorate genotoxic stress called the DNA damage response (DDR). This response underlies the organismal ability to sense and signal problems in its DNA, to arrest cell-cycle progression (cell-cycle checkpoints) and activate appropriate DNA repair mechanisms, or to eliminate cells with unrepairable genomes. The importance of the DDR network for the development and well being of humans is illustrated by the large variety of diseases and cancer-predisposition syndromes that have been linked to mutations of DDR genes (Ciccia and Elledge 2010).In eukaryotic cells, the cellular response to DNA damage is regulated and coordinated by the DDR signaling pathway. Like classic signal transduction pathways, the DDR uses signal sensors, transducers, and effectors (Fig. 1) (Zhou and Elledge 2000). In contrast to the signal transduction pathways that are activated by ligands of receptor kinases, the DDR signaling pathway is activated by aberrant DNA structures induced by DNA damage or DNA replication stress. The sensors of this pathway are the proteins that directly recognize these aberrant DNA structures and activate the most upstream DDR kinases. The DDR signaling pathway consists of a protein kinase cascade as well as mediator proteins that facilitate the phosphorylation events within the DDR network. The effectors of the DDR signaling pathway are substrates of the DDR kinases that participate in a wide spectrum of cellular processes important for genomic stability, such as DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell-cycle control. Although unique in the way through which it is activated, the DDR is a bona fide signal transduction pathway that is primarily driven by protein phosphorylation.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The framework of the DDR signaling pathway. Like other signal transduction pathways, the DDR signaling pathway consists of signal sensors, transducers, and effectors. The sensors of this pathway are proteins that recognize DNA structures induced by DNA damage and DNA replication stress. The transducers of this pathway are kinases, including ATM, ATR, and their downstream kinases. The effectors of this pathway are substrates of ATM, ATR, and their downstream kinases. These effectors of ATM and ATR are involved in a broad spectrum of cellular processes that are important for maintenance of genomic stability of organisms.In mammalian cells, the ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated), ATR (ATM- and Rad3-Related), and DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase) kinases are the most upstream DDR kinases. These large serine/threonine kinases are members of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-like kinase family (PIKKs) (Lempiainen and Halazonetis 2009; Lovejoy and Cortez 2009). In response to DNA damage, hundreds of proteins are phosphorylated at Ser/Thr-Glu motifs and additional sites in an ATM- or ATR-dependent manner, whereas DNA-PKcs appears to regulate a smaller number of targets and play a role primarily in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (Matsuoka et al. 2007; Smolka et al. 2007; Stokes et al. 2007; Bensimon et al. 2010; Beli et al. 2012). ATM and ATR also activate a second wave of phosphorylation through their activation of Chk1, Chk2, and MK2 protein kinases (Matsuoka et al. 1998; Liu et al. 2000; Reinhardt et al. 2007). Although the functional significance of many of these phosphorylation events remains to be understood, the potential ATM/ATR-regulated substrates are involved in a wide variety of cellular processes that may contribute to the DDR. In the picture emerging from these genome-scale studies, ATM and ATR are the master transducers of DNA signals, and they orchestrate a large network of cellular processes to maintain genomic integrity. In vivo and in vitro studies also suggest that the DNA-damage specificities and functions of ATM and ATR are distinct. Whereas ATM is primarily activated by double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), ATR responds to a broad spectrum of DNA damage, including DSBs and a variety of DNA lesions that interfere with replication. In this review, we will discuss how ATM and ATR are activated by DNA damage, how they are distinct from each other, and how they function in concert to regulate the DDR.     

A proteomic analysis of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) substrates identifies the ubiquitin-proteasome system as a regulator for DNA damage checkpoints

ATM (ataxia telangiectasia-mutated) and ATR (ATM-Rad3-related) are proximal checkpoint kinases that regulate DNA damage response (DDR). Identification and characterization of ATM/ATR substrates hold the keys for the understanding of DDR. Few techniques are available to identify protein kinase substrates. Here, we screened for potential ATM/ATR substrates using phospho-specific antibodies against known ATM/ATR substrates. We identified proteins cross-reacting to phospho-specific antibodies in response to DNA damage by mass spectrometry. We validated a subset of the candidate substrates to be phosphorylated in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner in vivo. Combining with a functional checkpoint screen, we identified proteins that belong to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) to be required in mammalian DNA damage checkpoint control, particularly the G(1) cell cycle checkpoint, thus revealing protein ubiquitylation as an important regulatory mechanism downstream of ATM/ATR activation for checkpoint control.     

Proteasome inhibition suppresses DNA-dependent protein kinase activation caused by camptothecin

The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway plays an important role in DNA damage signaling and repair by facilitating the recruitment and activation of DNA repair factors and signaling proteins at sites of damaged chromatin. Proteasome activity is generally not thought to be required for activation of apical signaling kinases including the PI3K-related kinases (PIKKs) ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK that orchestrate downstream signaling cascades in response to diverse genotoxic stimuli. In a previous work, we showed that inhibition of the proteasome by MG-132 suppressed 53BP1 (p53 binding protein1) phosphorylation as well as RPA2 (replication protein A2) phosphorylation in response to the topoisomerase I (TopI) poison camptothecin (CPT). To address the mechanism of proteasome-dependent RPA2 phosphorylation, we investigated the effects of proteasome inhibitors on the upstream PIKKs. MG-132 sharply suppressed CPT-induced DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation, a marker of the activation, whereas the phosphorylation of ATM and ATR substrates was only slightly suppressed by MG-132, suggesting that DNA-PK among the PIKKs is specifically regulated by the proteasome in response to CPT. On the other hand, MG-132 did not suppress DNA-PK activation in response to UV or IR. MG-132 blocked the interaction between DNA-PKcs and Ku heterodimer enhanced by CPT, and hydroxyurea pre-treatment completely abolished CPT-induced DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation, indicating a requirement for ongoing DNA replication. CPT-induced TopI degradation occurred independent of DNA-PK activation, suggesting that DNA-PK activation does not require degradation of trapped TopI complexes. The combined results suggest that CPT-dependent replication fork collapse activates DNA-PK signaling through a proteasome dependent, TopI degradation-independent pathway. The implications of DNA-PK activation in the context of TopI poison-based therapies are discussed.     

Maf1 regulates intracellular lipid homeostasis in response to DNA damage response activation

Surveillance of DNA damage and maintenance of lipid metabolism are critical factors for general cellular homeostasis. We discovered that in response to DNA damage–inducing UV light exposure, intact Caenorhabditis elegans accumulate intracellular lipids in a dose-dependent manner. The increase in intracellular lipids in response to exposure to UV light utilizes mafr-1, a negative regulator of RNA polymerase III and the apical kinases atm-1 and atl-1 of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. In the absence of exposure to UV light, the genetic ablation of mafr-1 results in the activation of the DDR, including increased intracellular lipid accumulation, phosphorylation of ATM/ATR target proteins, and expression of the Bcl-2 homology region genes, egl-1 and ced-13. Taken together, our results reveal mafr-1 as a component the DDR pathway response to regulating lipid homeostasis following exposure to UV genotoxic stress.     

DNA Double-Strand Break Formation upon UV-Induced Replication Stress Activates ATM and DNA-PKcs Kinases

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like protein kinases, including ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated), ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related), and DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit), are the main kinases activated following various assaults on DNA. Although ATM and DNA-PKcs kinases are activated upon DNA double-strand breaks, evidence suggests that these kinases are rapidly phosphorylated by ATR kinase upon UV irradiation; thus, these kinases may also participate in the response to replication stress. Using UV-induced replication stress, we further characterize whether ATM and DNA-PKcs kinase activities are also involved in the cellular response. Contrary to the rapid activation of the ATR-dependent pathway, ATM-dependent Chk2 and KAP-1 phosphorylations, as well as DNA-PKcs Ser2056 autophosphorylation, reach their peak level at 4 to 8 h after UV irradiation. The delayed kinetics of ATM- and DNA-PKcs-dependent phosphorylations also correlated with a surge in H2AX phosphorylation, suggesting that double-strand break formation resulting from collapse of replication forks is responsible for the activation of ATM and DNA-PKcs kinases. In addition, we observed that some phosphorylation events initiated by ATR kinase in the response to UV were mediated by ATM at a later phase of the response. Furthermore, the S-phase checkpoint after UV irradiation was defective in ATM-deficient cells. These results suggest that the late increase of ATM activity is needed to complement the decreasing ATR activity for maintaining a vigilant checkpoint regulation upon replication stress.     

Activation of ATR and related PIKKs

The DNA damage response kinase ATR is an essential regulator of genome integrity. TopBP1 functions as a general activator of ATR. We have recently shown that TopBP1 activates ATR through its regulatory subunit ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain (PRD) located adjacent to its kinase domain. This mechanism of ATR activation is conserved in the S. cerevisiae ortholog Mec1. ATR is a member of the PIKK family of protein kinases that includes ATM, DNA-PKcs, mTOR, and SMG1. The PRD regulates the kinase activity of other PIKKs and may serve as a site of interaction between these kinase and their respective activators. Activation of ATR by TopBP1 is maximal at low substrate concentrations and declines exponentially as substrate concentration increases. These data are consistent with a model in which TopBP1 acts to alter the conformation of ATR-ATRIP to increase the ability of ATR to bind substrates. A further understanding of the mechanism of ATR activation will likely provide insights into the regulation of related PIK kinases.     

The roles of p27Kip1 and DNA damage signalling in the chemotherapy‐induced delayed cell cycle checkpoint

DNA lesions trigger the DNA damage response (DDR) machinery, which protects genomic integrity and sustains cellular survival. Increasing data underline the significance of the integrity of the DDR pathway in chemotherapy response. According to a recent work, persistent exposure of A549 lung carcinoma cells to doxorubicin induces an initial DDR‐dependent checkpoint response, followed by a later DDR‐independent, but p27^Kip1‐dependent one. Prompted by the above report and to better understand the involvement of the DDR signaling after chemotherapeutic stress, we examined the potential role of the canonical DDR pathway in A549 cells treated with doxorubicin. Exposure of A549 cells, prior to doxorubicin treatment, to ATM, ATR and DNA‐PKcs inhibitors either alone or in various combinations, revealed that the earlier documented two‐step response was DDR‐dependent in both steps. Notably, inhibition of both ATM and ATR or selective inhibition of ATM or DNA‐PKcs resulted in cell‐cycle re‐entry despite the increased levels of p27^Kip1 at all time points analyzed. We further investigated the regulation of p27^Kip1 protein levels in the particular setting. Our results showed that the protein status of p27^Kip1 is mainly determined by p38‐MAPK, whereas the role of SKP2 is less significant in the doxoroubicin‐treated A549 cells. Cumulatively, we provide evidence that the DNA damage signaling is responsible for the prolonged cell cycle arrest observed after persistent chemotherapy‐induced genotoxic stress. In conclusion, precise identification of the molecular mechanisms that are activated during the chemotherapeutic cycles could potentially increase the sensitization to the therapy applied.     

丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶与DNA损伤应答

DNA损伤应答(DNA damage response,DDR)是维持基因组稳定性的核心机制,对DDR的研究不仅有助于阐明癌症发生发展的机理,同时也为癌症治疗和抗癌新药开发提供生物学基础。蛋白质翻译后修饰,尤其是蛋白激酶介导的磷酸化修饰和蛋白磷酸酶介导的去磷酸化修饰,参与调控绝大多数的生命活动过程,包括DDR。对蛋白激酶ATM/ATR/CHK2/CHK1介导的DDR的研究已经比较透彻,但是对蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能研究还有待加强和深入。比较全面地综述丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能并探讨在抗癌新药开发中的前景。     

Roles of ATM and ATR-Mediated DNA Damage Responses during Lytic BK Polyomavirus Infection

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an emerging pathogen whose reactivation causes severe disease in transplant patients. Unfortunately, there is no specific anti-BKPyV treatment available, and host cell components that affect the infection outcome are not well characterized. In this report, we examined the relationship between BKPyV productive infection and the activation of the cellular DNA damage response (DDR) in natural host cells. Our results showed that both the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)- and ATM and Rad-3-related (ATR)-mediated DDR were activated during BKPyV infection, accompanied by the accumulation of polyploid cells. We assessed the involvement of ATM and ATR during infection using small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdowns. ATM knockdown did not significantly affect viral gene expression, but reduced BKPyV DNA replication and infectious progeny production. ATR knockdown had a slightly more dramatic effect on viral T antigen (TAg) and its modified forms, DNA replication, and progeny production. ATM and ATR double knockdown had an additive effect on DNA replication and resulted in a severe reduction in viral titer. While ATM mainly led to the activation of pChk2 and ATR was primarily responsible for the activation of pChk1, knockdown of all three major phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like kinases (ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs) did not abolish the activation of γH2AX during BKPyV infection. Finally, in the absence of ATM or ATR, BKPyV infection caused severe DNA damage and aberrant TAg staining patterns. These results indicate that induction of the DDR by BKPyV is critical for productive infection, and that one of the functions of the DDR is to minimize the DNA damage which is generated during BKPyV infection.     

The RNA surveillance protein SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double-strand breaks but not exogenously oxidized mRNA

DNA damage, stalled replication forks, errors in mRNA splicing, and availability of nutrients activate specific phosphatidylinositiol-3 kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) that in turn phosphorylate downstream targets such as p53 on serine 15. While the PIKK proteins ATM and ATR respond to specific DNA lesions, SMG1 responds to errors in mRNA splicing and when cells are exposed to genotoxic stress. Yet, whether genotoxic stress activates SMG1 through specific types of DNA lesions or RNA damage remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that siRNA oligonucleotides targeting the mRNA surveillance proteins SMG1, Upf1, Upf2, or the PIKK protein ATM attenuated p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in cells damaged by high oxygen (hyperoxia), a model of persistent oxidative stress that damages nucleotides. In contrast, loss of SMG1 or ATM, but not Upf1 or Upf2 reduced p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks produced by expression of the endonuclease I-PpoI. To determine whether SMG1-dependent activation of p53 was in response to oxidative mRNA damage, mRNA encoding green fluorescence protein (GFP) transcribed in vitro was oxidized by Fenton chemistry and transfected into cells. Although oxidation of GFP mRNA resulted in dose-dependent fragmentation of the mRNA and reduced expression of GFP, it did not stimulate p53 or the p53-target gene p21. These findings establish SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double-strand breaks independent of the RNA surveillance proteins Upf1 or Upf2; however, these proteins can stimulate p53 in response to oxidative stress but not necessarily oxidized RNA.     

ATM activation accompanies histone H2AX phosphorylation in A549 cells upon exposure to tobacco smoke

Background  

In response to DNA damage or structural alterations of chromatin, histone H2AX may be phosphorylated on Ser139 by phosphoinositide 3-kinase related protein kinases (PIKKs) such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM-and Rad-3 related (ATR) kinase, or by DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). When DNA damage primarily involves formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), H2AX is preferentially phosphorylated by ATM rather than by the other PIKKs. We have recently reported that brief exposure of human pulmonary adenocarcinoma A549 cells or normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) to cigarette smoke (CS) induced phosphorylation of H2AX.     

ATM/ATR‐mediated phosphorylation of PALB2 promotes RAD51 function

DNA damage activates the ATM and ATR kinases that coordinate checkpoint and DNA repair pathways. An essential step in homology‐directed repair (HDR) of DNA breaks is the formation of RAD51 nucleofilaments mediated by PALB2–BRCA2; however, roles of ATM and ATR in this critical step of HDR are poorly understood. Here, we show that PALB2 is markedly phosphorylated in response to genotoxic stresses such as ionizing radiation and hydroxyurea. This response is mediated by the ATM and ATR kinases through three N‐terminal S/Q‐sites in PALB2, the consensus target sites for ATM and ATR. Importantly, a phospho‐deficient PALB2 mutant is unable to support proper RAD51 foci formation, a key PALB2 regulated repair event, whereas a phospho‐mimicking PALB2 version supports RAD51 foci formation. Moreover, phospho‐deficient PALB2 is less potent in HDR than wild‐type PALB2. Further, this mutation reveals a separation in PALB2 function, as the PALB2‐dependent checkpoint response is normal in cells expressing the phospho‐deficient PALB2 mutant. Collectively, our findings highlight a critical importance of PALB2 phosphorylation as a novel regulatory step in genome maintenance after genotoxic stress.     

DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation,fork restart,homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe

Genotoxins and other factors cause replication stress that activate the DNA damage response (DDR), comprising checkpoint and repair systems. The DDR suppresses cancer by promoting genome stability, and it regulates tumor resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Three members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase (PIKK) family, ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK, are important DDR proteins. A key PIKK target is replication protein A (RPA), which binds single-stranded DNA and functions in DNA replication, DNA repair, and checkpoint signaling. An early response to replication stress is ATR activation, which occurs when RPA accumulates on ssDNA. Activated ATR phosphorylates many targets, including the RPA32 subunit of RPA, leading to Chk1 activation and replication arrest. DNA-PK also phosphorylates RPA32 in response to replication stress, and we demonstrate that cells with DNA-PK defects, or lacking RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 targeted by DNA-PK, confer similar phenotypes, including defective replication checkpoint arrest, hyper-recombination, premature replication fork restart, failure to block late origin firing, and increased mitotic catastrophe. We present evidence that hyper-recombination in these mutants is ATM-dependent, but the other defects are ATM-independent. These results indicate that DNA-PK and ATR signaling through RPA32 plays a critical role in promoting genome stability and cell survival in response to replication stress.