Genomic imprinting and conflict-induced decanalization

Genomic imprinting is the phenomenon in which the expression pattern of an allele depends on its parental origin. When maternally expressed and paternally expressed imprinted loci affect the same trait, the result is an arms race, with each locus under selection to increase its level of expression. This article develops a model of the deleterious consequences of this escalation, deriving from an increase in the variance in gene expression level, and resulting increase in phenotypic variance in the population. This phenomenon is referred to here as "conflict-induced decanalization." Modifiers that canalize gene expression are selectively favored, but these induce further escalation from both loci, resulting in a net increase in phenotypic variance and a reduction in population mean fitness. This results in a feedback loop, where increasing canalization of gene expression leads to increasing decanalization of the phenotype. This phenomenon may explain the surprisingly high frequency of certain diseases. Disorders to which this decanalization process might contribute include growth- and metabolism-related phenomena such as preterm birth, as well as certain major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and autism.     

Gene interactions in the evolution of genomic imprinting

Numerous evolutionary theories have been developed to explain the epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting. Here, we explore a subset of theories wherein non-additive genetic interactions can favour imprinting. In the simplest genic interaction—the case of underdominance—imprinting can be favoured to hide effectively low-fitness heterozygous genotypes; however, as there is no asymmetry between maternally and paternally inherited alleles in this model, other means of enforcing monoallelic expression may be more plausible evolutionary outcomes than genomic imprinting. By contrast, more successful interaction models of imprinting rely on an asymmetry between the maternally and paternally inherited alleles at a locus that favours the silencing of one allele as a means of coordinating the expression of high-fitness allelic combinations. For example, with interactions between autosomal loci, imprinting functionally preserves high-fitness genotypes that were favoured by selection in the previous generation. In this scenario, once a focal locus becomes imprinted, selection at interacting loci favours a matching imprint. Uniparental transmission generates similar asymmetries for sex chromosomes and cytoplasmic factors interacting with autosomal loci, with selection favouring the expression of either maternal or paternally derived autosomal alleles depending on the pattern of transmission of the uniparentally inherited factor. In a final class of models, asymmetries arise when genes expressed in offspring interact with genes expressed in one of its parents. Under such a scenario, a locus evolves to have imprinted expression in offspring to coordinate the interaction with its parent''s genome. We illustrate these models and explore key links and differences using a unified framework.     

Genomic imprinting in plants

Genomic imprinting attracted particular attention in the 1980’s following the discovery that the parental origin of genetic information is essential for normal development of eutherians,1,2 for review see.3 The term imprinting was first introduced in the 1960s to describe the elimination of the paternal chromosomes during spermatogenesis in the Sciarid fly.4?6Today the term genomic imprinting mainly refers to parent?of?origin specific effects distinguishing each parental genome which can be regarded as memories, or “imprints”.7,8 Breaking the rules of Mendel, genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon per se. Epigenetics is currently defined as the study of mitotically or meiotically heritable changes in gene expression without any change in DNA sequence9,10 and it is intimately linked to the study of inheritance of chromatin states.11 Gene imprinting currently refers to differential expression of autosomal genes according to their parent of origin.12The phenomenon of genomic imprinting explains several cases of parent?specific human disorders.13 To date over 80 imprinted genes have been described in mammals14 and their parent?of?origin specific expression can correlate with changes in DNA methylation patterns, antisense noncoding RNAs and chromatin folding.3 Epigenetic imprints can either activate or silence the “imprinted” allele, and hence imprinting can be associated with either an expressed or silenced allele.15 In mammals, the number of paternally expressed imprinted genes is almost equivalent to the number of maternally expressed genes and the imprinted status can differs according to tissue, developmental stage and species. It is then crucial for our understanding to clearly indicate the status of imprinting (i.e., paternally or maternally expressed) and the context (e.g., species, developmental stage, tissue).     

High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon leading to parent-of-origin specific differential expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles. In plants, genomic imprinting has mainly been observed in the endosperm, an ephemeral triploid tissue derived after fertilization of the diploid central cell with a haploid sperm cell. In an effort to identify novel imprinted genes in Arabidopsis thaliana, we generated deep sequencing RNA profiles of F1 hybrid seeds derived after reciprocal crosses of Arabidopsis Col-0 and Bur-0 accessions. Using polymorphic sites to quantify allele-specific expression levels, we could identify more than 60 genes with potential parent-of-origin specific expression. By analyzing the distribution of DNA methylation and epigenetic marks established by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins using publicly available datasets, we suggest that for maternally expressed genes (MEGs) repression of the paternally inherited alleles largely depends on DNA methylation or PcG-mediated repression, whereas repression of the maternal alleles of paternally expressed genes (PEGs) predominantly depends on PcG proteins. While maternal alleles of MEGs are also targeted by PcG proteins, such targeting does not cause complete repression. Candidate MEGs and PEGs are enriched for cis-proximal transposons, suggesting that transposons might be a driving force for the evolution of imprinted genes in Arabidopsis. In addition, we find that MEGs and PEGs are significantly faster evolving when compared to other genes in the genome. In contrast to the predominant location of mammalian imprinted genes in clusters, cluster formation was only detected for few MEGs and PEGs, suggesting that clustering is not a major requirement for imprinted gene regulation in Arabidopsis.     

H19 and Igf2--enhancing the confusion?

Genomic imprinting, whereby certain genes are expressed dependent on whether they are maternally or paternally inherited, is restricted to mammals and angiosperm plants. This unusual mode of gene regulation results from the complex interplay between cis-regulatory elements, leading to parent-of-origin-dependent epigenetic modifications and tissue-specific patterns of imprinted gene expression. Many studies of imprinting and imprinted genes have focused on epigenetic effects, such as DNA methylation and chromatin structure. However, it is equally important to explore the interconnected role of regulatory elements at imprinted domains by genetic experiments, including the use of transgenes and deletions.     

Evolutionary genetic models of the ovarian time bomb hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting

At a small number of loci in eutherian mammals, only one of the two copies of a gene is expressed; the other is silenced. Such loci are said to be "imprinted," with some having the maternally inherited allele inactivated and others showing paternal inactivation. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how such a genetic system could evolve in the face of the selective advantages of diploidy. In this study, we examine the "ovarian time bomb" hypothesis, which proposes that imprinting arose through selection for reduced risk of ovarian trophoblastic disease in females. We present three evolutionary genetic models that incorporate both this selection pressure and the effect of deleterious mutations to elucidate the conditions under which imprinting could evolve. Our findings suggest that the ovarian time bomb hypothesis can explain why some growth-enhancing genes active in early embryogenesis [e.g., mouse insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2)] have evolved to be maternally rather than paternally inactive and why the opposite imprinting status has evolved at some growth-inhibiting loci [e.g., mouse insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r)].     

Conservation of genomic imprinting at the NDN, MAGEL2 and MEST loci in pigs

Imprinted genes have important effects on the regulation of fetal growth, development, and postnatal behavior. However, the study of imprinted genes has been limited in mammalian species other than human and mouse. Therefore, the study of porcine imprinted genes is useful for defining the extent of conservation of genomic imprinting among different species. In this study, the imprinting status of porcine NDN, MAGEL2 and MEST genes was determined by direct sequencing of the cDNAs and detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in individuals from reciprocal crosses between Meishan and Large White pigs for allele discrimination. The analysis was carried out in 13 different tissues (skeletal muscle, fat, pituitary gland, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, stomach, small intestine, uterus, ovary and testis) from 12 two-month-old piglets. Imprinting analysis showed that NDN and MAGEL2 were paternally expressed in all tissues where the genes were expressed as in human and mouse. Interestingly, MEST showed tissue-specific imprinting, being paternally expressed in skeletal muscle, fat, pituitary gland, heart, kidney, lung, stomach and uterus, and maternally expressed in spleen and liver.     

Genome-wide analysis of genomic imprinting in the endosperm and allelic variation in flax

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that causes biased expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles. In flowering plants, genomic imprinting predominantly occurs in the triploid endosperm and plays a vital role in seed development. In this study, we identified 248 candidate imprinted genes including 114 maternally expressed imprinted genes (MEGs) and 134 paternally expressed imprinted genes (PEGs) in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) endosperm using deep RNA sequencing. These imprinted genes were neither clustered in specific chromosomal regions nor well conserved among flax and other plant species. MEGs tended to be expressed specifically in the endosperm, whereas the expression of PEGs was not tissue-specific. Imprinted single nucleotide polymorphisms differentiated 200 flax cultivars into the oil flax, oil-fiber dual purpose flax and fiber flax subgroups, suggesting that genomic imprinting contributed to intraspecific variation in flax. The nucleotide diversity of imprinted genes in the oil flax subgroup was significantly higher than that in the fiber flax subgroup, indicating that some imprinted genes underwent positive selection during flax domestication from oil flax to fiber flax. Moreover, imprinted genes that underwent positive selection were related to flax functions. Thirteen imprinted genes related to flax seed size and weight were identified using a candidate gene-based association study. Therefore, our study provides information for further exploration of the function and genomic variation of imprinted genes in the flax population.     

Parental influences on expression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, G6pd, in the mouse; a case of imprinting

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity was measured in blood from heterozygotes for the normal allele G6pda and the low activity allele G6pda-mlNeu. In adult mice lower activity was found in G6pda/G6pda-mlNeu than in the reciprocal heterozygote G6pda-mlNeu/G6pda (the maternal allele being listed first). Thus, either the paternally derived allele was over-expressed or the maternally derived allele was under-expressed. By contrast, in younger mice the difference in G6PD activity in reciprocal crosses was less marked. The findings are interpreted in terms of differential imprinting of maternally and paternally inherited information. The explanation offered for age related differences is that, as a consequence of imprinting, either the paternal X-chromosome is preferentially reactivated, or cells in which the paternally derived allele is active are at a selective advantage, and proliferate better than those in which the maternally inherited allele is active.     

A Maternal–Offspring Coadaptation Theory for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting

Imprinted genes are expressed either from the maternally or paternally inherited copy only, and they play a key role in regulating complex biological processes, including offspring development and mother–offspring interactions. There are several competing theories attempting to explain the evolutionary origin of this monoallelic pattern of gene expression, but a prevailing view has emerged that holds that genomic imprinting is a consequence of conflict between maternal and paternal gene copies over maternal investment. However, many imprinting patterns and the apparent overabundance of maternally expressed genes remain unexplained and may be incompatible with current theory. Here we demonstrate that sole expression of maternal gene copies is favored by natural selection because it increases the adaptive integration of offspring and maternal genomes, leading to higher offspring fitness. This novel coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting is consistent with results of recent studies on epigenetic effects, and it provides a testable hypothesis for the origin of previously unexplained major imprinting patterns across different taxa. In conjunction with existing hypotheses, our results suggest that imprinting may have evolved due to different selective pressures at different loci.     

A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting

Imprinted genes are expressed either from the maternally or paternally inherited copy only, and they play a key role in regulating complex biological processes, including offspring development and mother–offspring interactions. There are several competing theories attempting to explain the evolutionary origin of this monoallelic pattern of gene expression, but a prevailing view has emerged that holds that genomic imprinting is a consequence of conflict between maternal and paternal gene copies over maternal investment. However, many imprinting patterns and the apparent overabundance of maternally expressed genes remain unexplained and may be incompatible with current theory. Here we demonstrate that sole expression of maternal gene copies is favored by natural selection because it increases the adaptive integration of offspring and maternal genomes, leading to higher offspring fitness. This novel coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting is consistent with results of recent studies on epigenetic effects, and it provides a testable hypothesis for the origin of previously unexplained major imprinting patterns across different taxa. In conjunction with existing hypotheses, our results suggest that imprinting may have evolved due to different selective pressures at different loci.     

The Evolution of Genomic Imprinting

In some mammalian genes, the paternally and maternally derived alleles are expressed differently: this phenomenon is called genomic imprinting. Here we study the evolution of imprinting using multivariate quantitative genetic models to examine the feasibility of the genetic conflict hypothesis. This hypothesis explains the observed imprinting patterns as an evolutionary outcome of the conflict between the paternal and maternal alleles. We consider the expression of a zygotic gene, which codes for an embryonic growth factor affecting the amount of maternal resources obtained through the placenta. We assume that the gene produces the growth factor in two different amounts depending on its parental origin. We show that genomic imprinting evolves easily if females have some probability of multiple partners. This is in conflict with the observation that not all genes controlling placental development are imprinted and that imprinting in some genes is not conserved between mice and humans. We show however that deleterious mutations in the coding region of the gene create selection against imprinting.     

Reproductive barrier and genomic imprinting in the endosperm of flowering plants

In flowering plants, success or failure of seed development is determined by various genetic mechanisms. During sexual reproduction, double fertilization produces the embryo and endosperm, which both contain maternally and paternally derived genomes. In endosperm, a reproductive barrier is often observed in inter-specific crosses. Endosperm is a tissue that provides nourishment for the embryo within the seed, in a similar fashion to the placenta of mammals, and for the young seedling after germination. This review considers the relationship between the reproductive barrier in endosperm and genomic imprinting. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that results in mono-allelic gene expression that is parent-of-origin dependent. In Arabidopsis, recent studies of several imprinted gene loci have identified the epigenetic mechanisms that determine genomic imprinting. A crucial feature of genomic imprinting is that the maternally and paternally derived imprinted genes must carry some form of differential mark, usually DNA methylation and/or histone modification. Although the epigenetic marks should be complementary on maternally and paternally imprinted genes within a single species, it is possible that neither the patterns of epigenetic marks nor expression of imprinted genes are the same in different species. Moreover, in hybrid endosperm, the regulation of expression of imprinted genes can be affected by upstream regulatory mechanisms in the male and female gametophytes. Species-specific variations in epigenetic marks, the copy number of imprinted genes, and the epigenetic regulation of imprinted genes in hybrids might all play a role in the reproductive barriers observed in the endosperm of interspecific and interploidy crosses. These predicted molecular mechanisms might be related to earlier models such as the "endosperm balance number" (EBN) and "polar nuclei activation" (PNA) hypotheses.     

Parental-specific methylation of an imprinted transgene is established during gametogenesis and progressively changes during embryogenesis.

Genomic imprinting is a regulatory process that requires a cell to recognize the parental origin of alleles. To understand how these alleles are distinguished, we have assessed changes in the DNA methylation of an imprinted transgene as it switches from one inheritance pattern to another while moving through gametogenesis and embryogenesis. We find that both maternally and paternally inherited methylation patterns are erased in primordial germ cells and that distinctive patterns emerge during germ cell maturation. In the case of the maternal allele, the methylation pattern is fully acquired during oogenesis. In the case of the paternal allele, the methylation pattern found in sperm undergoes further modification during embryogenesis. Thus, the distinction between "erased" maternal and paternal alleles is first established during their residence in different germ cells and then may be maintained by the recognition of the distinctive patterns that each allele displays in the zygote.     

哺乳动物印记域DLK1-DIO3的研究进展

DLK1-DIO3印记域定位于人14号染色体、小鼠12号染色体及绵羊18号染色体远端, 在真哺乳亚纲动物中印记保守。该印记域包含3个编码蛋白的父系表达基因Dlk1、Rtl1和Dio3以及若干大小不同的母系表达印记非编码RNA, 如miRNAs、snoRNAs 和大型非编码RNA Gtl2等。人和小鼠该印记域内印记基因剂量的改变将导致严重的表型异常甚至胚胎致死, 暗示正常的发育需要域内印记基因的正常表达。文章重点论述了哺乳动物DLK1-DIO3印记域的印记调控机制和域内印记基因及其功能的研究进展。     

Sex specific X chromosome expression caused by genomic imprinting

The conflict theory of genomic imprinting predicts that imprinted genes are growth enhancing when paternally expressed and growth suppressing when maternally expressed. The expression pattern of autosomal imprinted genes generally fits these predictions. However, the conflict theory cannot easily account for the pattern of X-linked imprinting in humans and mice. This has led us to propose a novel hypothesis that X-linked imprinting has evolved to control sex specific gene expression in early embryos. The hypothesis links paternal X-imprinting (i.e. paternal copy silencing) to random X-inactivation and the retention of Y-linked copies, and links maternal X-imprinting to escape from random X-inactivation and the loss of Y-linked copies.The hypothesis offers a good explanation of the existing data on X-imprinted genes.