DNA looping and translocation provide an optimal cleavage mechanism for the type III restriction enzymes

EcoP15I is a type III restriction enzyme that requires two recognition sites in a defined orientation separated by up to 3.5 kbp to efficiently cleave DNA. The mechanism through which site-bound EcoP15I enzymes communicate between the two sites is unclear. Here, we use atomic force microscopy to study EcoP15I-DNA pre-cleavage complexes. From the number and size distribution of loops formed, we conclude that the loops observed do not result from translocation, but are instead formed by a contact between site-bound EcoP15I and a nonspecific region of DNA. This conclusion is confirmed by a theoretical polymer model. It is further shown that translocation must play some role, because when translocation is blocked by a Lac repressor protein, DNA cleavage is similarly blocked. On the basis of these results, we present a model for restriction by type III restriction enzymes and highlight the similarities between this and other classes of restriction enzymes.     

A comparison of DNA cleavage by the restriction enzymes SalPI and PstI.

Methods for obtaining highly active, exonuclease-free, stable preparations of the Streptomyces albus P restriction enzyme SalPI are described. SalPI and its isoschizomer PstI (from the taxonomically distant Providencia stuartii 164) both cleave their recognition sequence (5'-CTGCAG-3') to generate fragments terminating in tetranucleotide 3' extensions whose sequence is 5'-TGCA-3'. Bacteriophage R4G2 DNA, protected against SalPI cleavage by pregrowth on S. albus P, is also protected against PstI cleavage; and total DNA of both S. albus P and P. stuartii 164 is resistant to cleavage by both enzymes.     

S-adenosyl methionine prevents promiscuous DNA cleavage by the EcoP1I type III restriction enzyme

DNA cleavage by the type III restriction endonuclease EcoP1I was analysed on circular and catenane DNA in a variety of buffers with different salts. In the presence of the cofactor S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet), and irrespective of buffer, only substrates with two EcoP1I sites in inverted repeat were susceptible to cleavage. Maximal activity was achieved at a Res2Mod2 to site ratio of approximately 1:1 yet resulted in cleavage at only one of the two sites. In contrast, the outcome of reactions in the absence of AdoMet was dependent upon the identity of the monovalent buffer components, in particular the identity of the cation. With Na+, cleavage was observed only on substrates with two sites in inverted repeat at elevated enzyme to site ratios (>15:1). However, with K+ every substrate tested was susceptible to cleavage above an enzyme to site ratio of approximately 3:1, including a DNA molecule with two directly repeated sites and even a DNA molecule with a single site. Above an enzyme to site ratio of 2:1, substrates with two sites in inverted repeat were cleaved at both cognate sites. The rates of cleavage suggested two separate events: a fast primary reaction for the first cleavage of a pair of inverted sites; and an order-of-magnitude slower secondary reaction for the second cleavage of the pair or for the first cleavage of all other site combinations. EcoP1I enzymes mutated in either the ATPase or nuclease motifs did not produce the secondary cleavage reactions. Thus, AdoMet appears to play a dual role in type III endonuclease reactions: Firstly, as an allosteric activator, promoting DNA association; and secondly, as a "specificity factor", ensuring that cleavage occurs only when two endonucleases bind two recognition sites in a designated orientation. However, given the right conditions, AdoMet is not strictly required for DNA cleavage by a type III enzyme.     

Effect of unusual polyamines on cleavage of DNA by restriction enzymes

The effect of unusual polyamines, such as thermine, caldopentamine, caldohexamine, tris(3-aminopropyl)amine, or tetrakis(3-aminopropyl)ammonium, on the activities of various restriction endonucleases was investigated by using an Escherichia coli plasmid as a substrate, which contains a high GC content fragment from an extreme thermophile. Restriction enzymes used were SmaI, BanII, NaeI, RsaI, and TaqI. Most of the polyamines tested were inhibitory to the enzyme activities. The larger and more branched a polyamine was, the more the activities of nucleases were inhibited. The inhibition was positively correlated with the polyamine concentration. The sites protected by a polyamine were identical to those protected by other polyamines, and also identical to those which were less sensitive to the restriction enzyme in the absence of polyamines. No sequence specificity was seen among these sites.     

DNA translocation blockage, a general mechanism of cleavage site selection by type I restriction enzymes

Type I restriction enzymes bind to a specific DNA sequence and subsequently translocate DNA past the complex to reach a non-specific cleavage site. We have examined several potential blocks to DNA translocation, such as positive supercoiling or a Holliday junction, for their ability to trigger DNA cleavage by type I restriction enzymes. Introduction of positive supercoiling into plasmid DNA did not have a significant effect on the rate of DNA cleavage by EcoAI endonuclease nor on the enzyme's ability to select cleavage sites randomly throughout the DNA molecule. Thus, positive supercoiling does not prevent DNA translocation. EcoR124II endonuclease cleaved DNA at Holliday junctions present on both linear and negatively supercoiled substrates. The latter substrate was cleaved by a single enzyme molecule at two sites, one on either side of the junction, consistent with a bi-directional translocation model. Linear DNA molecules with two recognition sites for endonucleases from different type I families were cut between the sites when both enzymes were added simultaneously but not when a single enzyme was added. We propose that type I restriction enzymes can track along a DNA substrate irrespective of its topology and cleave DNA at any barrier that is able to halt the translocation process.     

DNA cleavage reactions by type II restriction enzymes that require two copies of their recognition sites

Several type II restriction endonucleases interact with two copies of their target sequence before they cleave DNA. Three such enzymes, NgoMIV, Cfr10I and NaeI, were tested on plasmids with one or two copies of their recognition sites, and on catenanes containing two interlinked rings of DNA with one site in each ring. The enzymes showed distinct patterns of behaviour. NgoMIV and NaeI cleaved the plasmid with two sites faster than that with one site and the catenanes at an intermediate rate, while Cfr10I gave similar steady-state rates on all three substrates. Both Cfr10I and NgoMIV converted the majority of the substrates with two sites directly to the products cut at both sites, while NaeI cleaved just one site at a time. All three enzymes thus synapse two DNA sites through three-dimensional space before cleaving DNA. With Cfr10I and NgoMIV, both sites are cleaved in one turnover, in a manner consistent with their tetrameric structures, while the cleavage of a single site by NaeI indicates that the second site acts not as a substrate but as an activator, as reported previously. The complexes spanning two sites have longer lifetimes on catenanes with one site in each ring than on circular DNA with two sites, which indicates that the catenanes have more freedom for site juxtaposition than plasmids with sites in cis.     

Cleavage of DNA.RNA hybrids by type II restriction enzymes.

The action of a number of restriction enzymes on DNA.RNA hybrids has been examined using hybrids synthesised with RNAs of cucumber mosaic virus as templates. The enzymes EcoRI, HindII, SalI, MspI, HhaI, AluI, TaqI and HaeIII cleaved the DNA strand of the hybrids (and possible also the RNA strand) into specific fragments. For four of these enzymes, HhaI, AluI, TaqI and HaeIII, comparison of the restriction fragments produced with the known sequences of the viral RNAs confirmed that they were recognising and cleaving the DNA strand of the hybrids at their correct recognition sequences. It is likely that the ability to utilise DNA.RNA hybrids as substrates is a general property of Type II restriction enzymes.     

DNA cleavage site selection by Type III restriction enzymes provides evidence for head-on protein collisions following 1D bidirectional motion

DNA cleavage by the Type III Restriction-Modification enzymes requires communication in 1D between two distant indirectly-repeated recognitions sites, yet results in non-specific dsDNA cleavage close to only one of the two sites. To test a recently proposed ATP-triggered DNA sliding model, we addressed why one site is selected over another during cleavage. We examined the relative cleavage of a pair of identical sites on DNA substrates with different distances to a free or protein blocked end, and on a DNA substrate using different relative concentrations of protein. Under these conditions a bias can be induced in the cleavage of one site over the other. Monte-Carlo simulations based on the sliding model reproduce the experimentally observed behaviour. This suggests that cleavage site selection simply reflects the dynamics of the preceding stochastic enzyme events that are consistent with bidirectional motion in 1D and DNA cleavage following head-on protein collision.     

On the DNA cleavage mechanism of Type I restriction enzymes

Although the DNA cleavage mechanism of Type I restriction–modification enzymes has been extensively studied, the mode of cleavage remains elusive. In this work, DNA ends produced by EcoKI, EcoAI and EcoR124I, members of the Type IA, IB and IC families, respectively, have been characterized by cloning and sequencing restriction products from the reactions with a plasmid DNA substrate containing a single recognition site for each enzyme. Here, we show that all three enzymes cut this substrate randomly with no preference for a particular base composition surrounding the cleavage site, producing both 5′- and 3′-overhangs of varying lengths. EcoAI preferentially generated 3′-overhangs of 2–3 nt, whereas EcoKI and EcoR124I displayed some preference for the formation of 5′-overhangs of a length of ~6–7 and 3–5 nt, respectively. A mutant EcoAI endonuclease assembled from wild-type and nuclease-deficient restriction subunits generated a high proportion of nicked circular DNA, whereas the wild-type enzyme catalyzed efficient cleavage of both DNA strands. We conclude that Type I restriction enzymes require two restriction subunits to introduce DNA double-strand breaks, each providing one catalytic center for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis. Possible models for DNA cleavage are discussed.     

Subunit assembly for DNA cleavage by restriction endonuclease SgrAI

The SgrAI endonuclease usually cleaves DNA with two recognition sites more rapidly than DNA with one site, often converting the former directly to the products cut at both sites. In this respect, SgrAI acts like the tetrameric restriction enzymes that bind two copies of their target sites before cleaving both sites concertedly. However, by analytical ultracentrifugation, SgrAI is a dimer in solution though it aggregates to high molecular mass species when bound to its specific DNA sequence. Its reaction kinetics indicate that it uses different mechanisms to cleave DNA with one and with two SgrAI sites. It cleaves the one-site DNA in the style of a dimeric restriction enzyme acting at an individual site, mediating neither interactions in trans, as seen with the tetrameric enzymes, nor subunit associations, as seen with the monomeric enzymes. In contrast, its optimal reaction on DNA with two sites involves an association of protein subunits: two dimers bound to sites in cis may associate to form a tetramer that has enhanced activity, which then cleaves both sites concurrently. The mode of action of SgrAI differs from all restriction enzymes characterised previously, so this study extends the range of mechanisms known for restriction endonucleases.     

NucA is required for DNA cleavage during transformation of Bacillus subtilis

We have re-examined the roles of nucA and nin, in the transformation of Bacillus subtilis as conflicting accounts have been presented concerning the importance of these genes for transformation. The present report demonstrates that nucA deficiency lowers the rate of DNA transport and that NucA is needed for the double-strand cleavage of transforming DNA, probably acting directly as an endonuclease. A relative paucity of DNA termini, resulting from the absence of this endonuclease activity, most probably accounts for the decreased transport rate. NucA is a bitopic integral membrane protein, with its C-terminus external to the membrane where it is appropriately located to effect the cleavage of bound transforming DNA. We have also investigated the roles of the known competence genes in the DNA processing that accompanies transformation in B. subtilis. The genes that are required for DNA transport (comEA, comEC and comFA) are also required for the degradation of the non-transforming strand that accompanies internalization, but comEC and comFA are not needed for the double-strand cleavage that occurs external to the cell membrane.     

On the structure and operation of type I DNA restriction enzymes.

Type I DNA restriction enzymes are large, molecular machines possessing DNA methyltransferase, ATPase, DNA translocase and endonuclease activities. The ATPase, DNA translocase and endonuclease activities are specified by the restriction (R) subunit of the enzyme. We demonstrate that the R subunit of the Eco KI type I restriction enzyme comprises several different functional domains. An N-terminal domain contains an amino acid motif identical with that forming the catalytic site in simple restriction endonucleases, and changes within this motif lead to a loss of nuclease activity and abolish the restriction reaction. The central part of the R subunit contains amino acid sequences characteristic of DNA helicases. We demonstrate, using limited proteolysis of this subunit, that the helicase motifs are contained in two domains. Secondary structure prediction of these domains suggests a structure that is the same as the catalytic domains of DNA helicases of known structure. The C-terminal region of the R subunit can be removed by elastase treatment leaving a large fragment, stable in the presence of ATP, which can no longer bind to the other subunits of Eco KI suggesting that this domain is required for protein assembly. Considering these results and previous models of the methyltransferase part of these enzymes, a structural and operational model of a type I DNA restriction enzyme is presented.     

Hydrolysis of DNA by Ce(IV)/EDTA complexes--the mechanism of DNA cleavage and design of artificial restriction enzymes.

Homogeneous Ce(IV) complex of EDTA promptly hydrolyzes oligonucleotides under physiological conditions. Moreover, the activity of Ce(IV)/EDTA for DNA hydrolysis is promoted by the addition of amines. When [Ce(IV)/EDTA] = 5 mumol dm3 and [ethylenediamine] = 100 mmol dm3, the catalytic activity is about 50 times as large as that of Ce(IV)/EDTA. The combination of Ce(IV)/EDTA and amines is eminent tools for the future molecular biology and biotechnology.     

Site-dependent cleavage of pBR322 DNA by restriction endonuclease HinfI.

Cleavage of pBR322 DNA I by the restriction endonuclease HinfI is preferentially inhibited at specific HinfI cleavage sites. These sites in pBR322 DNA I have been identified and ordered with respect to the frequency with which they are cleaved. The HinfI site most resistant to cleavage in pBR322 DNA I is unique in that runs of G-C base pairs are immediately adjacent on both sites. Two differently permuted linear (DNA III) species were produced by cleavage with two different restriction endonucleases, PstI and AvaI. Only one of these linear molecules, that produced by PstI, exhibits the same preferential cleavage pattern as DNA I. The second linear species, that arising from AvaI digestion, shows pronounced relative inhibition of cleavage at the HinfI sites nearest the ends of the molecule (100 to 120 base pairs away, respectively). This result suggest that proximity to the termini of a linear DNA molecule might also influence preferential cleavage. The possibility of formation of stem-loop structures does not appear to influence preferential cleavage by HinfI.     

Sequence specific inhibition of DNA restriction enzyme cleavage by PNA.

Plasmids containing double-stranded 10-mer PNA (peptide nucleic acid chimera) targets proximally flanked by two restriction enzyme sites were challenged with the complementary PNA or PNAs having one or two mismatches, and the effect on the restriction enzyme cleavage of the flanking sites was assayed. The following PNAs were used: T10-LysNH2, T5CT4-LysNH2 and T2CT2CT4-LysNH2 and the corresponding targets cloned into pUC 19 were flanked by BamH1, Sal1 or Pstl sites, respectively. In all cases it was found that complete inhibition of restriction enzyme cleavage was obtained with the complementary PNA, a significantly reduced effect was seen with a PNA having one mismatch, and no effect was seen with a PNA having two mismatches. These results show that PNA can be used as sequence specific blockers of DNA recognizing proteins.     

DNA recognition and cleavage by the EcoP15 restriction endonuclease.

EcoP15 is a restriction-modification enzyme coded by the P15 plasmid of Escherichia coli. We have determined the sites recognized by this enzyme on pBR322 and simian virus 40 DNA. The enzyme recognizes the sequence:

In restriction, the enzyme cleaves the DNA 25 to 26 base-pairs 3′ to this sequence to leave single-stranded 5′ protrusions two bases long.