Multimodality treatment resulting in long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The early detection and complex therapy of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most seasonable questions of the gastroenterology-oncology, because of the increasing prevalence of the primary liver cancer. The course of the hepatocellular carcinoma is rapid, untreated patients rarely live over 5-6 months. Combination of different treatment modalities in HCC can offer the best chances for survival. If possible, a surgical resection should be the primary procedure, followed by adjuvant cytostatic treatment and chemoembolisation. The authors report three cases with HCC with extremely long survival. The long-term survival achieved by multimodality therapy, as presented in these cases, seems to justify aggressive therapeutical approaches in HCC. It has been concluded, that early detection and complex, aggressive multimodality treatment--even repeated liver resections and surgical elimination of duplex distant metastases--can result in long-term survival with a good quality of life.     

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series

BackgroundPatients with brain metastases (BM) live longer due to improved diagnosis and oncologic treatments. The association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with brain radiosurgery (SRS) allows complex dose distributions and faster treatment delivery to multiple lesions.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of SRS for brain metastasis using VMAT. The primary endpoints were local disease-free survival (LDFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were intracranial disease-free survival (IDFS) and meningeal disease-free survival (MDFS).ResultsThe average number of treated lesions was 5.79 (range: 2–20) per treatment in a total of 113 patients. The mean prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range: 12–24 Gy). The median LDFS was 46 months. The LDFS in 6, 12, and 24 months was for 86%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Moreover, brain progression occurred in 50 patients. The median overall survival was 47 months. The OS in 75%, 69%, and 61% patients was 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. IDFS was 6 and 24 months in 35% and 14% patients, respectively. The mean MDFS was 62 months; it was 6 and 24 months for 87% and 83% of patients. Acute severe toxicity was relatively rare. During follow-up, the rates of radionecrosis and neurocognitive impairment were low (10%).ConclusionThe use of VMAT–SRS for multiple BM was feasible, effective, and associated with low treatment-related toxicity rates. Thus, treatment with VMAT is a safe technique to plan to achieve local control without toxicity.     

Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network

Background

Accurate estimations of life expectancy are important in the management of patients with metastatic cancer affecting the extremities, and help set patient, family, and physician expectations. Clinically, the decision whether to operate on patients with skeletal metastases, as well as the choice of surgical procedure, are predicated on an individual patient''s estimated survival. Currently, there are no reliable methods for estimating survival in this patient population. Bayesian classification, which includes Bayesian belief network (BBN) modeling, is a statistical method that explores conditional, probabilistic relationships between variables to estimate the likelihood of an outcome using observed data. Thus, BBN models are being used with increasing frequency in a variety of diagnoses to codify complex clinical data into prognostic models. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of developing Bayesian classifiers to estimate survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastases of the axial and appendicular skeleton.

Methods

We searched an institution-owned patient management database for all patients who underwent surgery for skeletal metastases between 1999 and 2003. We then developed and trained a machine-learned BBN model to estimate survival in months using candidate features based on historical data. Ten-fold cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the BNN model''s accuracy and robustness.

Results

A total of 189 consecutive patients were included. First-degree predictors of survival differed between the 3-month and 12-month models. Following cross validation, the area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.93) for 3-month probability of survival and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90) for 12-month probability of survival.

Conclusions

A robust, accurate, probabilistic naïve BBN model was successfully developed using observed clinical data to estimate individualized survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases. This method warrants further development and must be externally validated in other patient populations.     

Current treatment of melanoma metastases of the brain

The appearance of brain metastases in patients with malignant melanoma predicts poor prognosis. During the last ten years important progress has been made in the treatment of brain metastases providing longer survival and better quality of life for these patients. In this review article the different treatment modalities, surgery, radiosurgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are described and the results published in the literature are briefly presented. Emphasis is made to show the effectiveness of a multimodality approach of this group of patients resulting in a better clinical outcome.     

A mathematical model of the treatment and survival of patients with high-grade brain tumours

More years of life per patient are lost as the result of primary brain tumours than any other form of cancer. The most aggressive of these is known as glioblastoma (GBM). The median survival time of patients with GBM is under 10 months and the outlook has hardly improved over the past 20 years. Generally, these tumours are remarkably resistant to radiotherapy and yet about 2-3% of all GBMs appear to be cured.The objectives of this study were to formulate a mathematical and phenomenological model of tumour growth in a population of patients with GBM to predict survival, and to use the model to extract biological information from clinical data.The model describes the growth of the tumour and the resulting damage to the normal brain using simple concepts borrowed from chemical reaction engineering. Death is assumed to result when the amount of surviving normal brain falls to a critical level. Radiotherapy is assumed to destroy tumour but not healthy brain. Simple rules are included to represent approximately the clinician's decisions about what type of treatment to offer each patient. A population of patients is constructed by assuming that key parameters can be sampled from statistical distributions. Following Monte Carlo simulation, the model can be fitted to data from clinical trials.The model reproduces clinical data extremely accurately. This suggests that the long-term survivors are not a separate sub-population but are the ‘lucky tail’ of a unimodal distribution. The estimated values of radiation sensitivity (represented as SF2, the survival fraction after 2 Gy) suggest the presence of severe hypoxia, which renders cells less sensitive to radiation. The model can predict the probable age distribution of tumours at presentation. The model shows the complicated effects of waiting times for treatment on the survival outcomes, and is used to predict the effects of escalation of radiotherapy dose.The model may aid the design of clinical trials using radiotherapy for patients with GBM, especially in helping to estimate the size of trial required. It is also designed in a generic form, and might be applicable to other tumour types.     

Incidence of bone metastases and survival after a diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer patients

Background: Bone is the most common metastatic site associated with breast cancer. Using a database of women with breast cancer treated at Guy's Hospital, London 1976–2006 and followed until end 2010, we determined incidence of and survival after bone metastases. Methods: We calculated cumulative incidence of bone metastases considering death without prior bone metastases as a competing risk. Risk of bone metastases was modelled through Cox-regression. Survival after bone metastases diagnosis was calculated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Results: Of the 7064 women, 589 (22%) developed bone metastases during 8.4 years (mean). Incidence of bone metastases was significantly higher in younger women, tumour size >5 cm, higher tumour grade, lobular carcinoma and ≥four positive nodes, but was not affected by hormone receptor status. Median survival after bone metastases diagnosis was 2.3 years in women with bone-only metastases compared with <1 year in women with visceral and bone metastases. There was a trend for decreased survival for patients who developed visceral metastases early, and proportionately fewer patients in this group. Interpretation: Incidence of bone metastases has decreased but bone metastases remain a highly relevant clinical problem due to the large number of patients being diagnosed with breast cancer.     

Motexafin gadolinium injection for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Despite recent advances in technology, targeting, and chemotherapy, brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant problem. The vast majority of patients with this diagnosis undergo whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, outcomes are still quite poor with median survivals measured in only months. In an effort to enhance outcomes from external beam radiation treatments, radiosensitizers have been investigated. Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) (Xcytrin, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is a novel radiation sensitizer with a unique mechanism of action that may increase the therapeutic index of WBRT for patients with brain metastases, particularly in those with NSCLC histologies. Here we review the rationale for the use of this drug as well as its current and future role as a radiation enhancer in the management of NSCLC brain metastasis.     

Osimertinib Improves overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases

ObjectiveOsimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that can effectively penetrate the blood brain-barrier (BBB). This study mainly explored the factors affecting the prognosis of EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM), and whether osimertinib could improve the survival benefit in these patients compared with those not treated with osimertinib.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who had been admitted with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM to the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2013 and December 2019. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary outcome of interest.ResultsA total of 71 patients with LM were included in this analysis, with a median OS (mOS) of 10.7 months (95% CI [7.6, 13.8]). Among them, 39 patients were treated with osimertinib after LM while 32 patients were untreated. Patients treated with osimertinib had a mOS of 11.3 months (95%CI [0, 23.9]) compared with the untreated patients who had a mOS of 8.1 months (95%CI [2.9, 13.3]), with a significant difference between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]): 0.43, 95%CI:0.22–0.66, p = 0.0009). Multivariate analysis revealed the use of osimertinib were correlated with superior OS with a HR of 0.43 (95%CI [0.25, 0.75]), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.003).ConclusionsOsimertinib can prolong the overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM and improve patient outcomes.     

Ovarian cancer: PCD and brain metastases

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD), the one of the most common paraneoplastic syndromes, refer to clinical disorders associated mostly with lung, ovarian and breast cancer, but not directly caused by the cancer or its metastases. Pathologic finding is an extensive loss of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. Immunohistochemically, the auto-antibodies on the Purkinje cells had been detected. Clinically, PCD is characterized by sub-acutely evolving pancerebellar symptoms. Neurological dysfunction may appear before the detection of the underlying cancer. Therefore, the surgical exploration is necessary for the final diagnosis. The patient undergoes specific therapy. Soon, neurological status of the patient gets irreparable worse. Death come usually 2-3 years after the first symptoms of the PCD occurs. Case of a 63-years old woman with PCD as the first evidence of her cancer is reported. The patient developed brain metastases and died almost 3 years after the first symptoms of PCD occur     

Long-term survival results after treatment for oligometastatic brain disease

AimThe aim of this study was to characterize the survival results of patients with up to four brain metastases after intense local therapy (primary surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy) if extracranial metastases were absent or limited to one site, e.g. the lungs.BackgroundOligometastatic disease has repeatedly been reported to convey a favorable prognosis.Material and methodsThis retrospective study included 198 German and Norwegian patients treated with individualized approaches, always including brain radiotherapy. Information about age, extracranial spread, number of brain metastases, performance status and other variables was collected. Uni- and multivariate tests were performed.ResultsMedian survival was 16.5 months (single brain metastasis) and 9.8 months (2–4, comparable survival for 2, 3 and 4), respectively (p = 0.001). After 5 years, 15 and 2% of the patients were still alive. In patients alive after 2 years, added median survival was 23 months and the probability of being alive 5 years after treatment was 26%. In multivariate analysis, extracranial metastases were not significantly associated with survival, while primary tumor control was.ConclusionLong-term survival beyond 5 years is possible in a minority of patients with oligometastatic brain disease, in particular those with a single brain metastasis. The presence of extracranial metastases to one site should not be regarded a barrier towards maximum brain-directed therapy.     

Retrospective analysis of treatment outcome in 315 patients with oligodendroglial brain tumors

Although chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine (PCV) is considered to be well tolerated, side effects frequently lead to dose reduction or even discontinuation of treatment of oligodendroglial brain tumors. The primary objective of the analysis was to retrospectively compare progression-free survival (PFS) after PCV vs. PC chemotherapy (without vincristine to avoid side effects). Patients were retrospectively identified from a database containing our patients between 1990 and 2003. For the selected cases, all histopathology reports were re-evaluated by a local neuropathologist. Based on the updated histology data, patients were included in the study if they had at least one histological diagnosis of an oligodendroglial tumor. PFS after start of PCV (n = 61) and PC (n = 84) chemotherapy identical (median 30 months). Multivariate analysis adjusting for prognostic imbalances favouring the PC group showed a minor, statistically non-significant benefit for PCV (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.53–1.25; p = 0.346). Younger age (< 50 y) was a statistically significant predictor of longer PFS. Significant advantages in terms of overall survival after first diagnosis of oligodendroglial tumor (OS, n = 315) were found for patients < 50 y (p < 0.001), oligodendrogliomas versus oligoastrocytomas (p = 0.002), and WHO°II vs. °III (p < 0.001). Three risk groups regarding OS were identified. Findings support the hypothesis that PC may be as effective as PCV chemotherapy, while avoiding the additonal risks of vincristine. Younger age, lower tumor grade and histology of an oligodendroglioma were identified to be favorable prognostic factors.     

Proteomic analysis of differential protein expression by brain metastases of gynecological malignancies

Brain metastases of gynecological malignancies are rare, but the incidence is increasing. Patients with brain metastases have a poor prognosis, therefore early detection and optimal management is necessary. In order to determine a new biomarker, we aimed to identify proteins that associated with brain metastases. We investigated proteins associated with brain metastases of gynecological malignancies in three patients who underwent surgical resection (stage IIb cervical cancer, stage Ib endometrial cancer, and stage IIIb ovarian cancer). Proteomic analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of the primary tumors and brain metastases, which were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Thereafter, candidate proteins were identified by the Scaffold system and Mascot search program, and were analyzed using western blotting and immunohistochemistry. As a result, a total of 129 proteins were identified. In endometrial and ovarian cancers, western blotting revealed that the expression of alpha-enolase (ENO1) and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI-1) was higher and the expression of Transgelin-2 (TAGLN2) was lower in metastatic tumors than in primary tumors. On the other hand, the expression of TPI-1 and TAGLN2 was lower in metastatic tumors than in primary tumors in cervical cancer. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that ENO1 expression was elevated in the metastatic tumors compared with the primary tumors. In conclusion, the present study showed that FFPE tissue-based proteomics analysis can be powerful tool, and these findings suggested that ENO1, TPI-1, and TAGLN2 may have a role in the development and progression of brain metastasis from gynecological malignancies.     

Brain irradiation-induced lymphocytosis predicts response in cancer patients with brain metastases

Lymphocytopenia is one of the main toxicities of radiotherapy and its severity is related to the irradiation dose. The occurrence of lymphocytopenia depends on the body site of radiotherapy; it is most pronounced with pelvic irradiation, whereas the effect of brain irradiation on the lymphocyte count is to be elucidated. This preliminary study was performed to evaluate changes in lymphocyte number occurring during brain irradiation in cancer patients with brain metastases. The study included 50 patients who received brain radiotherapy for single or multiple brain metastases at a total dose of 30 Gy. Overall, no significant changes in mean lymphocyte number occurred during brain radiotherapy. However, when lymphocyte variations were assessed in relation to the clinical response of brain metastases, a significant increase in the mean number of lymphocytes was found in patients who achieved objective regression of brain metastases on brain irradiation. The mean lymphocyte number decreased in nonresponding patients, albeit without a statistically significant difference with respect to the pretreatment values. The results of this study show that the efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases is associated with a significant increase in mean lymphocyte number. Therefore, evidence of brain irradiation-induced lymphocytosis may predict the efficacy of radiotherapy.     

Efficiency of balanced treatment allocation for survival analysis

We assess the efficiency of balanced treatment allocation methods in clinical trials for comparing treatments with respect to survival. We compare optimal designs for each of three standard survival analysis techniques (maximum partial likelihood estimation, log-rank test, exponential regression) with balanced designs, over a range of hypothetical trials. Although balanced designs are not optimal, we find them to be very efficient. In view of the high efficiency demonstrated in this and in a previous paper (Begg and Kalish, 1984, Biometrics 40, 409-420), and practical difficulties in implementing an optimal design, we recommend the use of balanced allocation methods in practice.     

Intentional iron overdose: an institutional review.

OBJECTIVE: To document the frequency of admissions and the outcome of patients with a diagnosis of intentional iron overdose to a large urban hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective review of hospital records. SETTING: Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, an 1100-bed primary and tertiary care centre serving a regional population of about 1.2 million. PATIENTS: All patients with a discharge diagnosis of iron overdose who were admitted from Jan. 1, 1979, to July 1, 1991. Of these 113 cases 66 (58%) represented an intentional iron overdose on the basis of information derived from the patient, family or friends. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of admissions, length of hospital stay and survival rate. RESULTS: Most (53 [80%]) of the 66 patients were females. The mean age was 19.8 (standard deviation [SD] 6.1) years (range 9 to 48 years). One third of the cases were associated with excess alcohol intake. The frequency of hospital admissions increased during the study period (1.4 cases per year in the first 5 years and 9.8 cases per year in the last 5; 5.3 cases per year overall). The mean length of hospital stay was 6.8 (SD 12.1) days, and the mortality rate was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital admissions because of intentional iron overdose are becoming more frequent in this centre and are associated with appreciable morbidity and mortality rates. Prospective studies are required to delineate clearly the signs, symptoms and abnormal laboratory findings associated with this problem.     

Contribution of case reports to brain metastases research: systematic review and analysis of pattern of citation

Research activity related to different aspects of prevention, prediction, diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases has increased during recent years. One of the major databases (Scopus) contains 942 scientific articles that were published during the 5-year time period 2006–2010. Of these, 195 (21%) reported on single patient cases and 12 (1%) were reports of 2 cases. Little is known about their influence on advancement of the field or scientific merits. Do brain metastases case reports attract attention and provide stimuli for further research or do they go largely unrecognized? Different measures of impact, visibility and quality of published research are available, each with its own pros and cons. For the present evaluation, article citation rate was chosen. The median number of citations overall and stratified by year of publication was 0, except for the year 2006 when it was 2. As compared to other articles, case reports remained more often without citation (p<0.05 except for 2006 data). All case reports with 10 or more citations (n = 6) reported on newly introduced anticancer drugs, which commonly are prescribed to treat extracranial metastases, and the responses observed in single patients with brain metastases. Average annual numbers of citations were also calculated. The articles with most citations per year were the same six case reports mentioned above (the only ones that obtained more than 2.0 citations per year). Citations appeared to gradually increase during the first two years after publication but remained on a generally low or modest level. It cannot be excluded that case reports without citation provide interesting information to some clinicians or researchers. Apparently, case reports describing unexpected therapeutic success gain more attention, at least in terms of citation, than others.