Aromatase in endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata

Endometrial tissue from uterine disease-free women does not exhibit aromatase activity. In contrast, aromatase enzyme activity and mRNA levels are readily detectable in endometriosis. PGE₂ stimulates both aromatase expression and activity in endometriotic stromal cells via promoter II region of the aromatase gene. This results in local production of estradiol, which induces PGE₂ formation and establishes a positive feedback cycle. This mechanism seems to contribute to continuous production of estradiol and PGE₂. Aromatase mRNA levels and enzyme activity are also present in uterine leiomyomata that are estrogen-dependent benign tumors of the myometrium. Successful treatment of endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata using aromatase inhibitors by recent pilot trials underscores the clinical significance of these molecular studies.     

Aromatase inhibitors in gynecologic cancers

The female genital tract is hormonally responsive, and consequently some tumors, which arise within in it, may be treated at least in part, with hormonal manipulation. The range of responses in clinical trials and case reports will be reviewed. Many of these diseases are too rare for clinical trial testing, and in some cases evidence is anecdotal at best. Recurrences of ovarian cancer have been treated with tamoxifen and megesterol acetate with variable response rates from 0 to 56%. The favorable toxicity profile of aromatase inhibitors led to trials of these agents for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. These agents have proved tolerable with minor response rates but a significant disease stabilization rate, which may be prolonged in a minority of cases. It is unclear if these responses may be predicted by estrogen receptor expression or aromatase expression. Anastrazole has also been tried in combination with an EGFR receptor-inhibitor, again showing minor responses but possibly an increase in TTT in some patients. Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary are rare, hormonally sensitive tumors, with reported responses to a variety of hormonal manipulations, including aromatase inhibition. In addition, combined endocrine blockade, including aromatase inhibition, has been tried with reports of success. Endometrial cancers, particularly type I lesions, are often treated with hormonal manipulation, most commonly with progestins, but also with antiestrogens such as tamoxifen. A trial of aromatase inhibition in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer showed minimal responses. Endometrial stromal sarcoma, an uncommon uterine malignancy, has shown response to hormonal treatments, with multiple case reports of efficacy of aromatase inhibition. Despite the rarity of some of these tumor types, rare tumor study groups, such as within the Gynecologic Oncology Group, should make an effort to prospectively define the utility of these treatments.     

Aromatase inhibitors in ovarian stimulation

The selective estrogen receptor modulator, clomiphene citrate (CC), has been the principal drug used for induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). CC is associated with adverse side effects and low pregnancy rates attributed to long-lasting estrogen receptor depletion. Anastrozole and letrozole are potent, non-steroidal, reversible aromatase inhibitors, developed for postmenopausal breast cancer therapy. We hypothesized that aromatase inhibitors could mimic the action of CC in reducing estrogen negative feedback on follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion, without depleting estrogen receptors. In a series of preliminary studies, we reported the success of aromatase inhibition in inducing ovulation in anovulatory women with PCOS. Moreover, we showed that concomitant use of aromatase inhibitors resulted in a significant reduction of the FSH dose needed for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. We suggest that aromatase inhibitors act through an increase in endogenous gonadotropin secretion as well as through increased intraovarian androgen levels that may increase ovarian FSH receptors. Recently, we demonstrated the safety of aromatase inhibitors in pregnancy outcome studies examining spontaneous pregnancy loss, multiple pregnancy rates and congenital anomalies compared to a control group of infertility patients treated with CC.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors

Inhibitors of aromatase (estrogen synthetase) have been developed as treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Both steroidal substrate analogs, type I inhibitors, which inactivate the enzyme and non-steroidal competitive reversible, type II inhibitors, are now available. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first selective aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce serum estrogen concentrations and cause complete and partial responses in approximately 25% of patients with hormone responsive disease who have relapsed from previous endocrine treatment. Letrozole (CGS 20, 269) and anastrozole (ZN 1033) have been recently approved for treatment. Both suppress serum estrogen levels to the limit of assay detection. Letrozole has been shown to be significantly superior to megace in overall response rates and time to treatment failure, whereas anastrozole was found to improve survival in comparison to megace. Both were better tolerated than the latter. The potential of aromatase within the breast as a significant source of estrogen mediating tumor proliferation and which might determine the outcome of inhibitor treatment was explored. Using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, aromatase and mRNA_arom was detected mainly in the epithelial cells of the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) of the normal breast and also in breast tumor epithelial cells as well as some stromal cells. Increase in proliferation, measured by increased thymidine incorporation into DNA and by PCNA immunostaining in response to testosterone was observed in histocultures of breast cancer samples. This effect could be inhibited by 4-OHA and implies that intratumoral aromatase has functional significance. An intratumoral aromatase model in the ovariectomized nude mouse was developed which simulated the hormone responsive postmenopausal breast cancer patient. This model also allows evaluation of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens in tumors of estrogen receptor positive, human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the human aromatase gene. Thus, the cells synthesized estrogen which stimulated tumor formation. Both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens were effective in suppressing tumor growth in this model. However, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen. When the aromatase inhibitors were combined with tamoxifen, tumor growth was suppressed to about the same extent as with the aromatase inhibitors alone. Thus, there was no additive or synergistic effects of combining tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors. This suggests that sequential treatment with these agents is likely to be more beneficial to the patient in terms of longer response to treatment.     

Aromatase inhibitors and arthralgia

In several large adjuvant clinical trials it has been demonstrated that substitution (eventually addition) of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) provides an improved outcome of endocrine-sensitive breast cancer over tamoxifen alone. Nevertheless, arthralgia induced by the AIs is one of the most frequent side effects in hormonal therapy. It is characterized by tenosynovial changes and is more frequent in patients in clinical practice than previously appreciated in adjuvant clinical trials. AI-related arthralgia may be related to estrogen deprivation, but estrogen replacement is not an option for these women. Therefore standard painkillers, NSAIDs (COX2 inhibitors), week opioids and other interventions (vitamin D, calcium, bisphosphonates, exercise, acupuncture, complementary and alternative approaches, eventually switch to another endocrine drug) are used for managing this treatment-related side effect, and improve adherence and quality of life among breast cancer survivors.     

Aromatase inhibitors and bone

The decrease in estrogen levels with the use of aromatase inhibitors results in an increase in the rate of bone remodelling. This result in an acceleration of bone loss, and probably to an increase in the risk of fractures. The risk of fracture is particularly high in the older woman and in the woman with a low bone mineral density. We have a number of proven treatments for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and it is likely that some of these, particularly bisphosphonates, could be effective at preventing bone loss with aromatase inhibitors.     

Aromatase inhibitors and hormone-dependent cancers

Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) occurs in a variety of tissues. Using immunocytochemistry, we have recently located this enzyme in cellular compartments of several types of human tissue. Furthermore, we found the mRNA was located in the same structures where tested. As both gonadal and peripherally formed estrogen contribute to growth of hormone sensitive cancers, we have developed aromatase inhibitors to block synthesis of this hormone. We have determined that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively inhibits aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. 4-OHA was also found to inhibit gonadotropin levels and reduce estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in treated animals. The mechanism of these effects appear to be associated with the weak androgenic activity of the compound. These effects together with aromatase inhibition may result in a synergistic response reducing estrogen production and action. In postmenopausal women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA at doses that did not affect their gonadotropin levels, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. These results indicate that 4-OHA is of benefit in postmenopausal patients with advanced disease who have relapsed from prior hormonal therapies, and that steroidal inhibitors may be of value in premenopausal patients.     

Aromatase inhibitors: future directions

Estrogen and its cognate estrogen receptor are key players in the etiology and progression of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors, suppressing tumor and plasma estrogen levels by blocking testosterone conversion to estrogen, have been proven to provide the most effective endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Aromatase inhibitors are now the first choice endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting for postmenopausal women. These endocrine agents also seem likely to soon become the standard adjuvant therapy, either alone or in sequence with tamoxifen, though their long-term toxicity and the optimum duration of therapy still remain to be defined. Advanced experimental studies and some clinical observations reveal the importance of blocking both the genomic and non-genomic activities of the estrogen receptor, as well as its crosstalk with growth factor and other cellular signaling, for greatest effectiveness of endocrine therapy. Consequently, these studies provide a mechanistic explanation for the superb performance of aromatase inhibitors, and also suggest how inhibiting selected growth factor receptors might delay or prevent the onset of resistance to aromatase inhibitors and other endocrine therapies.     

Aromatase inhibitors and xenograft studies

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have become the front-line choice for treatment of ER+ breast cancer. Nevertheless, although patients are responsive initially, they may acquire resistance and become unresponsive to further treatment. In addition, approximately 25% of breast cancers do not express the estrogen receptor (ERα) and consequently, are innately resistant to endocrine therapy. We have investigated the mechanisms associated with this lack of treatment response using xenograft models. We found that in cells and tumors that acquired resistance to the AI letrozole therapy, expression of the ER was reduced whereas growth factor signally was enhanced, including a marked increase in HER2 expression. Treatment with trastuzumab (HER2 antibody) resulted in a significant down-regulation of HER2 and p-MAPK as well as restoration of ERα expression. Thus, when trastuzumab was added to letrozole treatment at the time of tumor progression, there was significantly prolonged tumor suppression compared to trastuzumab or letrozole alone. This suggests that inhibition of both HER2 and ERα signaling pathways are required for overcoming resistance and restoring treatment sensitivity. ER negative tumors are innately resistant to endocrine therapy. Repression of the ERα has been found to be due to epigenetic modifications such as increased methylation and histone deacetylation. We found that entinostat (ENT), a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), activated not only expression of ERα but also aromatase in MDA-MB-231 ER-negative breast cancer cells, resulting in their ability to respond to estrogen and letrozole. Treatment with ENT in combination with letrozole significantly reduced tumor growth rate in xenografts compared to control tumors (p < 0.001). ENT plus letrozole treatment also prevented the colonization and growth of MDA-MB-231 cells in the lung with a significant reduction (p < 0.03) in both visible and microscopic foci. These results provide a strong indication for possible use of AIs in combination with HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of ER-negative breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

A number of inhibitors of estrogen synthesis are now becoming available which could be of value in the treatment of breast cancer. 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first of these compounds to enter the clinic has been found to be effective in postmenopausal patients who have relapsed from tamoxifen. Thus, in studies of 240 patients, 26% patients experienced partial or complete response to treatment. An additional 25% patients had disease stabilization. 4-OHA is a potent selective, steroidal inhibitor which causes inactivation of aromatase in vitro. It is effective in reducing concentrations of ovarian estrogens in rats and of ovarian and peripheral estrogens in non-human primate species. The compound has been shown to lower serum estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, not all of these patients experienced disease remission, suggesting that their tumors were hormone insensitive rather than that the dose of 4-OHA was suboptimal. In trials of patients who had not received prior tamoxifen treatment, 4-OHA (250 mg i.m. every 2 weeks) was found to induce complete or partial tumor regression in 33% of patients. The response of patients was not significantly different from that observed in patients treated with tamoxifen (30 mg o.d) of 37%. No significant difference between treatments was observed for disease stabilization, the duration of response or median survival. Several other steroidal aromatase inhibitors have been studied, such as 7-substituted androstenedione derivatives. MDL 18962 [10-(2-propynyl)estr-4-ene-3,17-dione] and FCE 24304 (6-methylen-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) are currently in clinical trials. Non-steroidal inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 enzymes, such as imidazole and triazole derivatives have been developed which are highly selective for aromatase. Three triazoles which are very potent and selective inhibitors are vorazole (6-[(4-chlorophenyl)(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-methyl]1-methyl-1H-benzotriazole R 76713, arimidex 2,2′[5-( -1,2,4-triazol-1-yl methyl)-1,3-phenylene]bis(2-methylpropiononitrile) (ZD1033) and letrozole 4-[1-(cyanophenyl)-1-(1,2,4-triazolyl)methyl]benzonitril (CGS 20267). These compounds reduce serum estradiol concentration to undetectable levels in breast cancer patients. These highly potent inhibitors provide the opportunity to determine whether a further degree of estrogen suppression will be important in producing greater clinical response. With the recent approval of 4-OHA in several countries and the introduction of the potent new compounds, aromatase inhibitors either alone or in combination with the antiestrogen are likely to improve the treatment of breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibitors: cellular and molecular effects

Marked cellular and molecular changes may occur in breast cancers following treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitors. Neoadjuvant protocols, in which treatment is given with the primary tumour still within the breast, are particularly illuminating. In Edinburgh, we have shown that 3 months treatment with either anastrozole, exemestane or letrozole produces pathological responses in the majority of oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich tumours (39/59) as manifested by reduced cellularity/increased fibrosis. Changes in histological grading may also take place, most notably a reduction in mitotic figures. This probably reflects an influence on proliferation as most tumours (82%) show a marked decrease in the proliferation marker, Ki67. These effects are generally more dramatic than seen with tamoxifen given in the same setting. Differences between aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen are also apparent in changes in steroid hormone expression. Thus, immuno-staining for progesterone receptor (PgR) is reduced in almost all cases by aromatase inhibitors, becoming undetectable in many. This contrasts with effects of tamoxifen in which the most common change on PgR is to increase expression. Changes in proliferation occur rapidly following the onset of exposure to aromatase inhibitors. Thus, neoadjuvant studies with letrozole in which tumour was sampled before and after 14 days and 3 months treatment show that decreased expression of Ki67 occur at 14 days and, in many cases, the effect is greater at 14 days than 3 months. These early changes precede evidence of clinical response but do not predict for it. However, this study design has allowed RNA analysis of sequential biopsies taken during the neoadjuvant therapy. Based on clustering techniques, it has been possible to subdivide tumours into groups showing distinct patterns of molecular changes. These changes in tumour gene expression may allow definition of tumour cohorts with differing sensitivity to aromatase inhibitors and permit early recognition of response and resistance.     

Aromatase inhibitors continue their ATAC on tamoxifen

The breast cancer drug tamoxifen, the best-known and most widely prescribed anticancer drug in the world, is facing a stiff challenge from an exciting group of compounds called aromatase inhibitors. ‘Tamoxifen is under threat,’ says Anthony Howell, Professor of Medical Oncology at Manchester's Christie Hospital, and Principal Investigator of the largest breast cancer trial ever undertaken. The initial results of this trial suggest that for postmenopausal women, the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (Arimidex®) is more successful than tamoxifen as an adjuvant (i.e. treatment given to patients after surgery to prevent their cancer returning). ‘If this result holds up, which I think it will undoubtedly, tamoxifen will be ousted from its first-line setting for postmenopausal women,’ he says.     

Aromatase inhibitors: basic and clinical studies

Application of aromatase inhibitors to the treatment of conditions in which estrogen plays, a role is discussed. Studies in vitro demonstrate that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) is a potent inhibitor of aromatase. The compound reduces ovariant estrogen production and causes regression of carcinogen (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in the rat. In the rhesus monkey, 4-OHA was also shown to inhibit peripheral aromatization. To date 58 postmenopausal breast cancer patients with advanced metastatic disease have received 500 mg im weekly while 31 patients received 250 mg 4-OHA orally per day. Estradiol levels were significantly reduced in all patients from a mean of 7.2 + 0.8 pg/ml to 2.8 + 0.3 pg/ml. Of patients receiving 4-OHA im 27% had partial or complete responses and in 10% of patients the disease was stabilized. Similar responses occurred in the patients receiving 4-OHA orally. These results suggest that 4-OHA is effective and that this compound and other aromatase inhibitors could be valuable new additions to the treatment of breast cancer.     

Aromatase and other inhibitors in breast and prostatic cancer

Estrogens have an important role in the growth of breast and other hormone-sensitive cancers. We have shown that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. In postmenopausal men and women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either by daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. We recently studied the effects of 4-OHA and other aromatase inhibitors, 10-propargylestr-4-ene-3,17-dione (PED) and imidazo[1,5-]3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrin-6-yl-(4-benzonitrile) (CGS 16949A) as well as 5-reductase inhibitors, N,N-diethyl-4-methyl-3-oxo-4-aza-5-androstane-17β-carboxyamide (4-MA) and 17β-hydroxy-4-aza-4-methyl-19norandrost-5-en-3-one (L651190) in prostatic tissue from 11 patients with prostatic cancer and six patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and from normal men at autopsy. We attempted to measure aromatase activity in tissue incubation by quantitating ³H₂O released during aromatization of androstenedione or testosterone labeled at the C-1 position. The amount of ³H₂O released from all samples was at least twice that of the heat inactivated tissue samples. The ³H₂O release was significantly inhibited by 4-OHA and 4-MA, but not by the other aromatase inhibitors. However, when HPLC and TLC were used to isolate steroid products, no estrone or estradiol was detected in the incubates. Furthermore, no aromatase mRNA was detected following amplification by PCR. The 4-OHA was found to inhibit 5-reductase in both BPH and cancer tissue, although to a lesser extent than 4-MA. The other aromatase inhibitors were without effect. Although a mechanism involving intraprostatic aromatase is not likely, inhibitors may act to reduce peripherally-formed estrogens. In postmenopausal breast cancer, the results indicate that 4-OHA is of significant benefit.     

Aromatase inhibitors: their biochemistry and clinical potential

It has been proposed that one of the endocrinological factors in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia is estrogen stimulation of stromal growth. Current clinical experience with anti-estrogenic compounds indicates that, in the case of mammary carcinoma, aromatase inhibitors provide a viable alternative to estrogen receptor antagonists for treatment of the disease. It is proposed that inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis could likewise provide a non-invasive therapy for benign prostate disease. Some aspects of the activity of known aromatase inhibitors as substrates for enzymes of steroid metabolism and their potential relevance to the pharmacology of the compounds are discussed.     

Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer

In postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, numerous phase III trials have been performed comparing the third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NS-AIs) anastrozole and letrozole and the steroidal AI (S-AI) exemestane in the “first-line” setting against tamoxifen and in the “second-line” setting against megestrol acetate. In both settings, the AIs were at least as efficacious or superior in some endpoints with a preferable toxicity profile including a lower incidence of thrombotic events. Relatively small differences in potency between the three AIs have been identified and it has not been demonstrated that these differences have clinical implications. The recent establishment of the value of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women will impact on their utilization in advanced disease. In premenopausal women the third-generation AIs have not been studied as monotherapy and there is a paucity of data in combination with ovarian function suppression in the advanced disease setting. The main area of future investigations for the AIs in premenopausal women will be in the adjuvant therapy setting in combination with suppression of ovarian function.     

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer

There is increasing evidence that endocrine therapy has an important role in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Several large meta-analyses have reinforced the value of both ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in improving survival. Over the past decade, aromatase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer, and the third generation inhibitors have now an established reputation for good patient tolerability. Early studies indicated that aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone could benefit postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer, and in 2001, the ATAC study showed that the third generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, seemed superior to tamoxifen in that anastrozole-treated patients had a longer disease-free survival. Other studies will report on the relative merits of the steroidal inhibitor exemestane as well as non-steroidal letrozole. The exact duration and sequencing of treatment, together with the long-term effects on bone are at present, unknown.